Berkeley City Council Meeting - April 21, 2026: Vacancy Report, Consent Calendar, and Public Comments
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Okay, hello everyone.
Good evening.
I am going to call to order the Berkeley City Council meeting.
Today is Tuesday, April 21st, 2026, and it is 608 p.m.
Thank you very much for your patience, everyone.
Can we please start off with the roll?
Certainly.
And Mayor, before we get started with the role, Councilmember O'Keefe will be participating remotely under the Just Cause Provision of the Brown Act.
So we're going to run through that script real quick.
Councilmember O'Keefe is intending to participate in the meeting remotely pursuant to the Brown Act under the Just Cause justification.
A quorum of the councils participating in person at a single physical location that is identified on the agenda, open to the public within the boundaries of the agency and meets accessibility requirements.
This satisfies the requirements of the Brown Act.
Councilmember O'Keefe has notified us of her need to participate remotely.
Councilmember O'Keefe, if you would please provide a general description of the circumstances relating to your need to appear remotely, and you're reminded that you need not disclose any medical diagnosis, disability, or other confidential medical information.
Yeah, thanks.
I have a sick kid.
Thank you.
Councilmember O'Keefe, please disclose whether any other individuals 18 years of age or older are present in the room at your remote location and the general nature of your relationship with such individuals.
Just a cat.
He's under 18.
Thank you.
And council member O'Keith, you're reminded that you must participate through both audio and visual technology.
Okay.
I might turn off my camera briefly if I have to go check on my kid, but I'll be I'll be here.
Thank you.
All right.
Um and we can go ahead and proceed with the roll.
Councilmember Kessarwani.
Here.
Councilmember Taplin is absent.
Councilmember Bartlett is absent.
Councilmember Tracub.
Thank you.
O'Keefe.
Here.
Blackabee.
Here.
Moonapara.
Here.
Humbert.
Present.
And Mayor Ishi.
Here.
Thank you.
Thank you so much, Rose.
All right.
So we have a quite lengthy report out from closed session.
So please bear with me.
It's a lot of letters and numbers.
Item number one, the city council met in closed session on August 20th, 2026, pursuant to government government code section 54956.9 subsection D, and provided directions to outside council and approved a settlement by compromise and release as to a workers' compensation matter assigned claim number BER 220002 and WCAB case number ADJ 15513397.
Item number two, the city council met in closed session on April 20, 2026, pursuant to government code section 54956.9 subsection D, and provided direction to outside council and approved a settlement by compromise and release with a release of future medical care or in the alternative by stipulations with a request for award with open future medical care as to a workers' compensation matter assigned claim number BER 2000 151 and WCAB case number ADJ 17521808.
Item number three, the city council met in closed session on April 20, 2026, pursuant to government code section 54956.9 subsection D, and provided directions to outside council and approved a settlement by stipulations and request for award with open future medical care as to a workers' compensation matter, assigned claim number BER2400105.
Two more items left.
Item number five, the mayor and city council met in closed session and voted to authorize the city attorney's office to file appeals in the matter of Berkeley Homeless Union et al.
v.
City of Berkeley et al.
Four colon 25-C V-01414-EMC and Proto et al.
V City of Berkeley case number three, colon 23-CV-04537-EMC.
Uh in the Northern District California.
Item number six, the mayor and city council met in closed session to discuss the matter of INRE DHCS audit of City of Berkeley Reed GEMT cost reports.
OAAHA appeal numbers, GE24-040621-963-TS.
GE26-0622-731L-VT.
DHCS Matters Matter Numbers 24-026104 and 24-026106.
The council voted to authorize the city attorney's office to engage in settlement negotiations with the agency and commence litigation if necessary.
Thank you all for your patience.
So we have no ceremonial items this evening, so we'll move straight on to the city manager comments.
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
I don't have any comments tonight.
Thank you.
Is there any public comment on non-addenda matters?
Oh, did you submit a okay good?
Great.
Thank you.
All right, thank you, Mayor.
We do have a couple of cards here for individuals in the room.
So we'll take those first.
Okay.
And our in-room speakers in no particular order are Rachel Barry and Rolf Bell.
So please go ahead and come on up to the podium.
And each speaker will have one minute to speak.
Hi, good evening, Council members.
My name is Rachel Barry.
I work with Root and Bloom Institute, a nonprofit renovating a vacant building on 6 and Bancroft Way in Berkeley.
We're excited to open later this year for a holistic mental health therapy and vocational training.
I'm here tonight because after we began renovating this building, a new traffic light was installed on our corner, and with it came Red Kermin Kerbing 150 feet in all directions, taking away nearly 50 parking spaces, including ADA parking from our corner.
When we spoke to our neighbors, no one seemed to know this traffic light would include the inclusion of four left turn lanes, which is significant because those are what eliminated most of our parking spaces.
While many of us appreciate the traffic light, bike lanes, and crosswalk, most of the left-turn lanes at this intersection are unnecessary at Bakroftway, which to the east is a designated traffic suppression street, and to the west, dead ends after four blocks.
In January of last year, several of us in the neighborhood began reaching out to city officials and staff to share the impact and request some dialogue.
After 16 months of emails with mayor's office, city council members, and city staff, we have gained no traction on this issue, and we ask for your support in finding a real solution.
Thank you.
Thank you.
We have online speakers as well.
You are correct, yes, but we do have more than five.
So we have more than five?
We do.
Thank you very much.
Just checking.
Do I need to press the button or you press the button?
Yeah, we can hear you.
I'm Rolf Bell, a 26-year resident of Berkeley and a business owner.
In the last two months of 2024, at the corner of Bancroft Way and 6th Street, all four corners were torn up, and a total of 16 signal lights were installed and the entire intersection reconfigured.
There are 30 small businesses and 16 residences directly impacted.
None received a notice.
The traffic light makes pedestrian safe uh pedestrian crossing safer, but three of the four left turn lanes make cycling more dangerous and rob 30 businesses and 16 residences of essential parking.
We find it bizarre that our council member tapman and our mayor can't seem to find the time to meet with us and find a resolution that is better for cyclists, better for residents, and better for business.
Now we ask you to make time for us along with the traffic engineer to correct this over-design.
Thank you.
Thank you.
We'll now go to the online speakers.
Catherine, you should be able to speak.
Okay.
Can you hear me?
Yes, we can.
Okay, great.
Yeah, my name is Lily Howell.
I am the parent of three Berkeley community members, and I have a daughter who is 18 years old who had the blissful experience of going through the parks and recreations therapeutic recreation program.
Um she has autism and intellectual disability and was enabled to access community programs through the Parks and Recreations Department for enrichment and joy, just like any other kid and like her siblings through therapeutic recreation.
I saw on the mayor's budget not a reduction, but an elimination of this vital program for students with disabilities.
And in the birthplace of the disability rights movement, I'm pretty appalled at the city of Berkeley to eliminate accessibility inclusion and recreation for our children with disabilities in our community.
Frankly, shame on you.
It's very upsetting.
Catherine, thank you for your public comment.
Our next speaker is the caller.
Whoops, I'm sorry.
Our next speaker is Della.
Thank you.
I'm calling or telling you all about some thoughts I had.
I was reflecting on how many fires there were recently in Berkeley.
And I'm noticing that maybe it's with the new non-reporting clauses with the emergency, but we're not, as constituents, getting a report back on like what the cause of the fires were.
And it just makes me think that we all could be sitting on, you know, um a hazard that we're not aware of.
Maybe it was like an e-bike charging battery or a lithium battery or um countless uh potentialities I could think of that it could possibly be, but it would be nice to hear about what is causing the fires in Berkeley so that other constituents can be careful and more mindful and make sure we don't have the exact same hazard um in our units.
That's it.
Thank you.
Thank you, Della.
All right, thank you.
The next uh speaker is the caller ending in 211.
Caller, you should be able to speak.
Hi, uh good evening.
So our measure measure.
Documents, please read them and let's take some consideration.
Our business did over 200 million dollars for business since 1973.
Everyone need help.
I want you to walk down telegraph from Bancroft down to Ashby.
About half of the vacant.
It is a shame.
Shame on the city.
Why are this visit vacant when it can be thriving businesses to help a student to help business help everybody?
Need to call.
I need a closer mayor ashi.
As soon as possible.
And let's think Berkeley grid again.
Right now, Berkeley is bankrupt.
Have a good night.
Uh I'll call you again.
Thank you.
Thank you.
All right.
Our next speaker is Craig.
Craig, you should be able to speak.
Yes, hi.
My name's Craig Nagasowa.
I own a building at 1201 6th Street, which is Harrison and 6th.
And I'm sure you're all aware of what's going on down there.
I've been there for 25 years.
And the last five years have been completely living hell.
I'm on the front lines of all of the unhoused stuff that is going on.
Last week or 10 days ago, there was a fire, blistered the it was hot enough, it blistered the paint on the side of my building.
The next day the city came, made sure that the person who started the fire was okay and cleaned up and then allowed him to move back in.
There's no parameters whatsoever for people coming or going.
Anyone who wants to can set up another tent, another house, another, whatever they want.
There's trash and garbage.
There's disease.
I mean, you know all of the adjectives.
There's all of this stuff going on, dangerous safety issues.
I have been thank you, Craig.
Your time is up, but thank you for your comment.
All right.
Thank you, Mayor.
That was our last speaker for non-agenda public comment.
And um, I'd just like to take a moment and acknowledge that council member Bartlett has joined the meeting remotely.
And Councilmember Bartlett, if you are available, we can go through the just cause script.
I'm here.
I'm still working on getting set up my computer's acting up, but I'm here.
Super.
All right, wonderful.
We'll go through this script, which will allow you to participate in the remainder of the meeting.
Um, Councilmember Bartlett is intending to intending to participate in the meeting remotely pursuant to the Brown Act under the Just Cause justification.
A quorum of the council is participating in person at a single physical location that is identified on the agenda, open to the public within the boundaries of the agency and meets accessibility requirements.
This satisfies the requirements of the Brown Act.
Councilmember Bartlett has notified us of his need to participate remotely.
Councilmember Bartlett, at this time, would you please provide a general description of the circumstances relating to your need to appear remotely at this meeting?
And you are reminded that you need not disclose any medical diagnosis, disability, or other confidential medical information.
I'm recovering from a medical condition.
Thank you, Councilmember.
Please, at this time disclose before we take any action, whether there are any other individuals 18 years of age or older present in the room with you at your location, and if so, the general nature of your relationship with them.
No, however, my spouse may come in and out at will.
Thank you.
All right, Councilmember Bartlett, you are reminded to please participate through both audio and visual technology.
Thank you.
Be there soon.
Thank you.
But there was a program that they had mentioned in particular.
And I just want to make sure that that person knows.
I don't think they're listening anymore, but that we propose to keep it with the sales and use tax passing.
So they should just know that.
Okay.
Oops.
So many things.
All right, here we go.
I think that that was it then for our public comment on non-agenda matters.
Thank you all very much.
And uh we will now move on to the consent calendar.
So I would like to see if my council member colleagues have any comments.
Oh uh councilmember Treyco.
Uh thank you so much, Madam Mayor.
Um I would like to thank my colleagues for um supporting or I would like to thank my colleagues on the agenda uh and rules committee for moving items 14, 15, and 16 to the consent calendar.
Um item 14 uh is uh a support position on SB 1301 uh by Senator Allen reforming the insurance non-renewal process, um, which is uh obviously something that is um uh a situation that is um that is increasing um not just among homeowners in uh uh well in and around zone zero, but also now uh in the Barclay flats, including my district.
So the approach from a number of constituents um and this bill is an effort to reform the insurance non-renewal process.
I would like to thank council members Blackaby, Humbert, and O'Keefe, what they're called sponsorship.
Uh item 15 is a support position on SB 1257 by Senator Arrighine, which would be a report um around federal immigration uh enforcement, uh another way to keep the federal government accountable.
Um, and I would like to thank uh the mayor, councilmember Lunapara, and I would also like to add council member Kessarwani as uh co-sponsor to or as a co-sponsor to that item.
Uh and lastly, item 16, um, which is a support position on three uh environmental bills, uh SB 222, the heat pump access act by Senator Wiener, SB 868, also by Senator Beader, which is the plug and play, also known as the Balcony Faller Act and AB 2389 by Assembly Member Orwin, uh, which will uh extend a uh tax credit for um stop solar, which would otherwise expire at the end of this year.
And I would like to add council member Lunapara for co-sponsorship.
Um also I would like to thank Councilmember Blackaby for um uh adding me as a call sponsor to item 17, setting measurable golfs and metrics for key city priorities.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much.
And then um something else I want to make a comment on before we um before we move forward with comments from my colleagues is that I'd like to move item 11 from the Peace and Justice Commission on the flock safety on flock safety to May 7th, when we hear this item, the surveillance and flaw contract item, and also move item 12 from the peace and justice commission on the proposed use of controlled weapons and other policing tools to the meeting when these items will return from the public safety committee.
And mayor, may I recommend that item 12 be referred to the agenda and rules committee for scheduling at that time?
Thank you.
Yes, that would be good, Rose.
Do we need to take the action can be part of the action the council takes on the calendar?
Okay.
Thank you very much.
Okay, Councilmember Blackabee.
Thanks, Madam Mayor.
Um, just a few comments on the consent calendar um in an order.
First, I just want to thank uh Councilmember Bartlett on item two for his nomination to the police accountability board as we're working to kind of re uh reset and restock the board uh with a full compliment of board members.
Um my nominees coming at our next meeting, and I know a number of us have others coming, and so again, just following up on that and making sure that folks know we are trying to get the board fully staffed and back uh fully functional as quickly as possible.
So just want to thank Councilmember Martlett for his nomination and look forward to mine next week.
Um item four, I wanted to really appreciate our health housing and community services team uh for their work with the East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation uh to help secure nine million dollars in state funds to support um the affordable housing project at the North Berkeley BART station, which I know is a near and dear to many of our hearts, in particular councilmember Casarwani.
So thanks to uh city staff uh for again securing that important financing.
Um item 14.
Um thanks to council member um Tragub for adding these a co-sponsor.
Um this is Senator Ben Allen's bill to reform the insurance non-renewal process.
Uh as councilmember Traegum mentioned, this is a bigger and bigger issue for many families here in Berkeley.
We're seeing it in my district all the time.
Um the number of people who are losing insurance and then do not know why they've lost insurance, do not know how to sort of remedy the situation.
They're given sort of very vague um uh communications uh and have no sort of recourse.
And so I just want to appreciate uh the bill and also uh councilmember Trageb's work on this.
We also have a um a full kind of docket of other wildfire safety legislation that's being considered by the legislature.
Uh we're bringing a resolution on that at our next meeting that I hope my um my uh colleagues will will support.
Um there's a lot of good stuff happening in the legislature, and it's important for us to lend our voice um to those things that are addressing real problems that we're facing here in Berkeley.
Um and then on item 17.
You know, we've seen um we've kind of been seeing different pieces of this.
The city auditor came out with a report and some um suggestions.
Um this is the setting measurable goals and metrics for key city priorities.
Um the city manager and his team have been very helpful and supportive.
The Health Life Enrichment Equity and Community Policy Committee have reviewed it.
Um I'm excited that again with um adoption on the consent calendar tonight, we'll be able to move this forward to help bring even greater transparency and accountability around key performance goals.
I think that again, it's no no no no news to anyone that we're facing some real budget uh challenges here in in Berkeley.
So I think it's even more important to be able to communicate to the public what we are delivering with a reduced level of financial resource, um, what they can expect from us in terms of what the city is delivering.
And I think this is one measure that again is about setting those goals and holding ourselves accountable for for meeting those those marks.
So I just want to appreciate uh the support on that.
And that's it.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Councilmember Humbert.
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
Um my first comment um is on item 13, um, which is uh an item from the Peace and Justice Commission to reaffirm City of Berkeley commitment to international peace, opposing war on Iran, and standing in solidarity with the people of Iran.
And I want to say that council's already adopted an item on this topic that I believe is substantially similar, very similar to this one.
I don't think it's sensible for us to adopt a second item, especially without knowing whether and how it may conflict with the earlier item.
I don't know if it does or not.
And I don't believe it is worth the time of council or staff, especially in the context of a major budget crisis to try to reconcile largely duplicative items.
Um I'd suggest if the commission feels strongly that their item touches on subjects that are essential and which we missed as council, then I would encourage them to send a new item that's specific specifically calls out those areas of difference and explains why they necessitate further council action.
Um the federal immigration enforcement report.
I was gonna ask to be added, but now I think it's full, but thank you very much for the council members who are the author, um, councilmember Tregoub and uh the co-sponsors.
Um it was the insurance the insurance uh non-renewal process and thanks I want to thank council member uh tragoob for authoring that and for adding me as a co-sponsor it's a really critically important issue um thank you thank you um any other council members have comments I will just add um a thank you also to councilmember Bartlett um for putting forward his Pab nominee and I know that Councilmember Blackabies is coming up I believe in the next meeting um just so folks know we are moving those appointments forward um so we will hopefully have a full PAP very soon um thank you very much okay can I please take public comment on consent and information items only come on up I um I don't know if I get two minutes because there's oh good and I have uh Rolf Bells giving me his time as well if I need it uh George Lippman I'm representing the peace and justice commission tonight um and uh uh at the request of the chair Pastor Dwayne Phillips who couldn't be here tonight so he's asked me to represent um first I want to say with regard to item um 13 I appreciate the uh comment and and and agree we uh with count with the council member we um did pass this before the council acted and we also uh appreciate the similarities and also to appreciate uh uh the council members' comments at that time in very full throated uh support of the item so appreciate that and the whole council um I want to speak about item and and and I and I support the mayor's move on 11 and 12 to defer those those that's not a not an issue um I want to um read a little bit even though we're moving this item 11 um to another date uh I want to re take the opportunity to read a little bit of what we asked for um this the peace and justice commission recommends applying a social justice lens to to policy policing decisions that could have a significant impact on the lives of Berkeley's residents and visitors including disparate impact on marginalized low-income disabled elder and community members of color the proposal is or the recommendation is cancel flock safety contracts for public surveillance images and video footage and do not sign any new contacts contracts with flock for stationary cameras or for drones such as first responder by drone due to flock's repeated sharing of such data with immigration authorities and the inherent risk of exposure of cloud based storage to Trump administration access and I'll just make from my perspective a few key points what we've learned over time it can't first of all it can't be said too many times no matter what safeguards you have built into your contract with Flock a judicial warrant obtained by Homeland Security will override your contract and ICE will get our photos and video and videos of our vulnerable community members and if you are hit with a secret FISA warrant you won't even know your data was taken because it would be a felony for Flock to tell you this has to be taken seriously you check with your with your attorney if you want but all this work that you're going through to find exceptions isn't going to help you when they come with a subpoena secondly FLOC's biggest shareholder is Andreessen Horowitz that is owned by billionaire ICE supporter Mark Andreessen who is a leading supporter of Trump he flipped from being a liberal to being MAGA and he considers and this is the quote to remember DEI and immigration to be quote two forms of discrimination that's from Fortune magazine not a left wing paper thirdly Flock is engaged in politically corrupt business practices is reported that the company has hired hired the mayor of Moreno Valley California 3000 population to work as a community engagement manager to get local policies passed and contracts signed to benefit Flock.
It is reported that the company has hired hired the mayor of Moreno Valley, California, 300,000 population, to work as a community engagement manager to get local policies passed and contracts signed to benefit Flock.
This is corruption, and this is what they're doing.
This is what they want to do with every community in the state.
This is the company that we're in bed with.
Please be careful with your vote.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Good evening.
And uh I use the pronouns he and him.
I'm just here to uh thank uh council members uh Tregobedora for uh the item 16, the uh support of the two uh bills by Scott Wheeder on uh heat pumps and uh balcony solar, as well as the uh Irwins keeping uh solar affordable act.
Uh really appreciate all the support uh for the city on clean energy energy uh this uh weekend.
Thank you also for uh your support for the upcoming uh uh home electrification fair at the Brower Center from Citizen Climate Lobby.
Unfortunately, I won't be able to be there, but uh hope you all are able to come out and uh keep moving our progressively in this uh on on the climate while Washington continues to go backwards, but we're we're moving forward.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I guess I've missed you.
I had to come back, and I do have an extra minute.
I'm speaking to number two.
I really encourage the support that we're getting for the police accountability commission.
I am so impressed with their diligence, their brilliance, and their wanting to serve this community.
I'm really concerned on number four about the low income and actual quote affordability of so many of these projects.
The ratio is like a few to a hundred in most of these uh enterprises that I've been listening to, so I'm concerned about that, just as a general principle.
And then in terms of number 10 stairs, I've had personal interaction with them such that I have nothing good to say, given that they broadcast themselves as being ADA compliant, and definitely were not, and yet had been paid, I'm trying not to yell, I'm sorry, had been paid a bazillion dollars to do it with 90, over 90 code violations.
So they've also again been given more money to create this amended situation with structures that were left out in the rain all winter long.
Anyway, and now they're asking for more money.
I just want to alert you.
I have intimate firsthand and secondhand knowledge, and I am not pleased, especially when I know of programs that actually do what they say and come through and serve the community such that we aren't wasting money, getting pillaged and plundered, and back to then the um I'm gonna jump to number 17 because it this measuring things so that there can actually be transparent accountability, it's brilliant.
But again, the numbers in the wrong hands can be misused as we're seeing all over this country.
All right.
And then in terms of the Peace and Justice Commission, I go there, much to their chagrin and mine over and over and over again because peace is not just a noun, it's a verb.
It's a verb and justice.
It's not about fighting whose right.
It's about could there be some measure of equanimity, equality, care and concern for everyone in humanity.
It's like, oh my God, so the flock thing, safety, not really, weapons, no, thank you.
And what about committing to like the old happy that I am, make love not war?
I again it's a darn good idea.
I'm really trying to encourage you to remember that we could be living in peace and harmony where everyone could be okay.
So, all right.
I just thank you.
I'm so glad you're still willing to show up.
Hang up, Willie.
I am too.
So take care of you.
Thank you.
Thanks, Maria.
All right, we do have some raised hands on Zoom.
Um the first speaker, and this is comments on the consent calendar.
Our first speaker is the number ending in 211.
Speaker, you should be able to speak.
Okay, so now I like to speak in consent item two and consent item 13.
Two memory of our great birth chief Dash Butler who made Berkeley very man.
Also my family, one who had over a million dollar embeddment in our San Francisco store.
Once two burger policemen, I paid them six thousand dollars a month.
I had to save my family, my son, and everybody.
As far as the 13, Donald Trump actually would go into the rest of the bomb on your own.
But the manual nuclear football refused, walked out of the room.
This man is extremely dangerous.
He's extremely dangerous.
Every day when he's in power, all of our life, in life, everybody's life, is in danger.
Again, our move this bit of a million dollars in taxes at the city of Berkeley in license fees and sales tax.
Need help.
Berkeley people need help.
Everybody won't have East TV location in Berkeley where we can do a little business.
Help everybody.
And what I can the hill, City of Berkeley.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
All right, our next speaker is Wendy.
Wendy, you should be able to speak.
I'm sorry, it's number 35 included on the peace and justice commission included on the consent calendar now.
Uh yes, the items from Okay.
That's what I wanted to speak in support of the uh peace and justice commission recommendations with regard to the flux safety contracts, and strongly urged that no action be taken to engage in the contracts at this time.
I don't think we know enough to do so in a safe and prudent manner that would uh safeguard all of the interests of all of the people of Berkeley really appreciate the stand that's been taken by uh the mayor, council members drag up, uh Luna Parra, and uh our vice chair Bartlett, and I hope that the rest of you will reconsider.
Thank you.
Thank you.
And and just so folks know, we I'm allowing public comment for items 11 and 12 for the peace and justice commission, but we've also uh part of the action that we'll take on the consent calendar is to move those items to the meetings in which we'll discuss those issues.
So just to make sure everyone is on the same page.
Thank you.
Our next speaker um is the caller with the number ending 405.
You should be able to speak.
Hi, heart.
Uh uh sorry to be off topic here, but um severely anti-flock.
I just had to pop my two bit, and thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Our next speaker is Lisa.
Lisa, you should be able to speak.
Good evening, Mayor and Council.
Thank you for this opportunity to support the peace and justice commission's recommendations via the read the flock contract.
Um, I believe that they um are correct, and um that council should really take them to heart.
Thank you so much.
Thank you, Lisa.
Okay, I see that council member Bartlett has his hand raised.
Did you want to give comment?
Oh, yeah, just briefly, now that I'm all set up properly, and one to um thank everyone for for all everything.
Um my addition to the um PAB, uh Benjamin Nash is an excellent young man.
Uh he's gonna serve the body really well.
Hope you approve him.
He's going to uh you know really deliver a whole new vantage point, and he's really a conscious young man.
He's been active in the community, and uh happened to teach his class uh as a coincidence at the grad school at Pacal, and it was quite a wonderful day, and uh really impressed with him.
I think you will be too.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councilmember.
Um, yeah, Councilmember Humbert.
Public comment is over, is that right?
Okay, thank you, Madam Mayor.
Yeah, I wanted to in connection with um the motion on accepting the consent calendar because item 13 it followed up on my prior comments.
Because item 13 uh as salutary as it may be is duplicative of what we've already done, I'd like to to keep that on the cons move to can keep that on the consent calendar for the purpose of taking no action.
Sorry, just to clarify, um Rose, does that need like that would happen unless there are objections, or could you I'm sorry, please refresh my memory.
Um yeah, if that is the council's intention to take no action on that item, and that is accepted um by the body as the motion related to that item, then that can proceed as long as there's no objection, is that right?
Correct.
Okay.
So just wanted to make sure that there's no objection to that.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay, very good.
Thank you.
All right, is there a motion then?
I move adoption of the consent calendar as amended.
Second.
Okay, can we take the role on that, please?
Certainly.
Um the consent calendar, Councilmember Kessarwani.
Yes.
Taplin?
Yes.
Bartlett.
Yes.
Trigob.
I.
O.K.
Yes.
Blackaby.
Yes.
Munapara?
Yes.
Humbert.
In solidarity with Councilmember Trugoob, I'll say I.
And Mayor Ishi.
Yes.
Thank you.
Thank you.
All right, thank you all very much.
Um, okay, so we have completed our consent calendar, moving on to our action calendar, um, to item number 18, which is to conduct a public hearing in compliance with Assembly Bill 2561, government code section 3502.3 regarding vacancies, recruitment, and retention efforts.
And we have a presentation, so I will pass it over to staff.
Good evening, honorable mayor and members of the city council.
I'm Monica Walker, and tonight I on behalf of the human resources department, I will be presenting on the vacancies, recruitment, and retention efforts under AB 2561 and government code 3502.3.
Uh effective January 1st, 2025, AB 2561 and Government Code 3502.3 now requires public agencies to represent on the status of vacancies, recruitment, and retention at a public hearing once a year prior to the budget being adopted before the governing body.
Uh just to note the measurement period for the data that we will be presenting tonight is from calendar year 2025.
So it spans January 1st through December 31st of that year.
Uh the vacancy rate citywide during that time frame uh averaged about 15% uh at the end of each month, with the highest vacancy rate being 16.1% and 14.7%.
And although the staff report uh refers to uh the frozen positions that were held vacant, um those were added in um as part of the number.
When we look across the bargaining units, um most of the bargaining units were under 20 percent.
Uh two of them were over 20 percent, Berkeley Chief Fire Officers Association, BFCOA, and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, IBEW.
Um BFCOA's percentage resulted from two battalion chiefs who retired in December uh 2025.
And because a snapshot was taken as of December 31st, 2025, it captures those vacancies before they could be filled, and they were filled a few weeks later in January of 2026.
Uh for IBEW, uh the vacancies were two electricians, which um are have since been filled or are now in pre-employment, um, two lead electricians and one lead communications technician, which resulted from an internal promotion from within that bargaining unit.
And just to take a moment out to talk about percentages as it relates to smaller bargaining units.
The number of vacancies in a smaller bargaining unit represents a larger portion, each position does.
So although we had five vacancies in IBAW, it represented an over of 20% percentage.
But with those two positions that have since been filled, it reduced it to under 20%.
And the same with the battalion chiefs.
It was two positions, but the total number was seven, which resulted in a higher vacancy.
These are the general steps for a civil service recruitment, starting from when a position is vacant all the way to when an employee is onboarded.
These steps are part of a civil service framework to ensure that there's transparency and fairness and an equal opportunity for everyone to apply for a position.
And though we operate within this framework, we try to look continuously at ways to make things more efficient.
Our entire process is electronic.
We have brought a lot of things in-house, such as our fingerprinting, and we try to move things along while still embracing a civil service framework.
One of the things that we're also doing is reaching out to get qualified candidates, and we're not waiting for candidates to just hear about a job opportunity or to be looking for a job.
We reach out to find them.
This is our dedicated career website where they can find out about how wonderful it is to work for Berkeley.
These are examples of our continually increasing social media presence where we talk about and feature our existing employees and why they like to work at the City of Berkeley.
We also have information on how to apply for jobs, and we really try to outreach to candidates in that way.
For example, for the electrician positions, we went to professional websites such as this to try to find those who are already in the profession and see if they're interested in working for the city of Berkeley.
As a result of our efforts, we received close to 16,000 applications in 2025.
And 12,000 of those were unique applicants, unique persons.
And this is an overwhelming number for the position that we are trying to fill, and it resulted in the relatively low vacancy rate that was reported earlier.
Of the 229 vacancies created in 2025, you can see that over 40% of them resulted from internal promotions, internal transfers, or budgeted positions.
And the rest were due to natural attrition retirement, voluntary termination terminations, and a few involuntary terminations.
We also filled 248 vacancies in 2025 through new external or internal recruitments, internal only recruitments, and existing eligible lists.
In addition to strong compensation, we offer a defined benefit retirement plan through CalPERS, medical dental vision insurance, Claremont EAP support services throughout the employees' life cycle, and organizations such as Team Unity who plan events to try and unify the city.
We have a supervisor learning plan.
We had 3% through natural attrition, 4% through turnover, and overall a very, very strong retention rate throughout the city.
Without the members of our HR team, I would not be able to report the numbers that I am reporting today.
I would not be able to report the numbers that I am reporting today.
Our team supports our employees through every phase of their employee life cycle.
And like to give special recognition to our director, Janelle Rodriguez for her leadership and guidance.
And Anna Gouler, our HR analyst for compiling and tracking a lot of the data that you saw on this slide, as well as spearheading our outreach and digital outreach for our candidates.
Thank you very much.
Thank you, Monica.
Thank you for the presentation.
Okay, so I'd like to start with any council questions.
Questions from my council colleagues.
Okay, Councilmember Blackby.
Just had one quick one.
Thanks for the presentation.
When you talk about the 15% kind of average vacancy, how does that stack up against other municipal governments locally?
Just how is this benchmark?
So other agencies that we've seen average from between 14 and 20 percent.
Um so we're about average, and it really depends on the composition of their workforce too, right?
Um our vacancies might be different than their vacancies in terms of the classifications and the bargain units.
Uh that's great.
And then similarly on the um on numbers around um the turnover and attrition and retention.
I think you said 3%.
Um retention.
Um, and how does that kind of look if you were to benchmark that?
Um, I can look more into that.
Um, I don't have that number offhand, but I can look more and get back and follow up with you.
Okay, thank you very much.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Other questions?
You saw my questions.
Good questions.
Okay, very good.
Um can we please have any public comment on item number 18?
Which is the public hearing and compliance with Assembly Bill 2561, government code section 3502.3 regarding vacancies, recruitment, and retention efforts.
Public comment?
Yes.
And for the unions, um, just so you know, I've given you five minutes, you know, so you have a little more time than public comment.
So I don't know if oh, you're you're just here to take a video.
Okay.
All right, very good.
Okay, go ahead.
Hello, Mayor and Council.
I appreciate this opportunity to speak.
Uh, my name is Thomas Gregory.
I'm the president of SEIU 1021 CSU PTRLA, and I'm commenting on behalf of my chapter.
As you know, uh the city management is planning to eliminate many vacant positions when the new fiscal year starts in a couple of months.
As of December 31st, 2025, um there were 270 vacant positions citywide, and 77 of those 270 vacancies are within my chapter.
Um, if council passes the budget balancing plan as is this June, the city will eliminate 42 of my chapter's 77 vacant positions.
And the city will eliminate at least 114 of the 270 vacancies that currently exist citywide.
And this 114 figure only accounts for the non-sworn vacant positions to be eliminated in fiscal year 27.
On top of this 114 figure, there are sworn positions that could also be eliminated in fiscal year 27.
Of course, elimination of positions, including vacant positions, is bad for our members, uh, but bad for members of my chapter and other chapters.
The elimination of positions results in less collective power for bargaining units, fewer opportunities for promotions and lateral moves, and fewer opportunities to retreat during times of proposed layoffs, such as right now.
That said tonight, I wanted to stress the negative impact that the elimination of so many positions will have on the community at large as opposed to the city's various labor chapters.
Eliminating vacant positions makes permanent a downward adjustment in the city's capacity to serve its constituents.
Vacancies obviously don't provide value to constituents, but at least vacancies have the potential to benefit the community in the future when funding and/or qualified candidates are more abundant.
Planning department vacancies that get eliminated will deprive homeowners and businesses of the potential for quicker turnaround times for permit approvals in the future.
Um behavioral health vacancies that get eliminated will deprive at-risk and unstable residents the potential for prompt delivery of mental health care.
A permanently understaffed accounts receivable team will perpetually struggle to add a leak adequately collect revenue.
Every eliminated position translates into a permanent deficit in capacity, and this deficit will have tangible impacts on the constituents who avail themselves of city services in the future.
It's true that an eliminated position could theoretically be established in reestablished in the future.
However, given the city's HR department's failure over the course of years to fill large numbers of vacancies, it would be a mistake to assume that HR and other leadership staff will be nimble enough to adequately create needed positions in the future when funding allows.
Thank you.
Any other public comment on this item?
I don't see anyone online.
I don't see any hands raised.
Okay.
Are there any comments on this item?
Councilmember Caserwani.
Um thank you very much, uh Madam Mayor.
I I just wanted to thank you very much for the presentation.
Um it's it's very helpful to get this information about vacancy rates.
I think you had it by position, right?
Um I thought you may have.
Um, but but in any case, um, and and then you also have I oh yes, you do you on one of the slides, the vacancy rate by position.
And um, so I just wanted to um to note that and um and then the other thing I wanted to note was the um the the retention rate and the um the vacancies created um and I I know this was this is technically a question I didn't ask it during the question time, but I just wanted to clarify when you have this 93% annual staff retention rate.
Are we um can you just explain how you're calculating that?
Are you just looking at well?
I'll just let you answer.
Um, sure.
So the first two uh numbers retirement and voluntary separations, um, that's that number added together divided by the number of budgeted positions.
Can you just speak into the microphone a little bit more?
Okay.
So it's um the 38 retirement, the 15 and voluntary separations added together, and then divided by the total number of budgeted positions.
Oh, okay.
Okay, that's helpful.
I was just a little oh, okay.
I misread uh 2025 colon is 227.
Okay, thank you so much.
That's very helpful.
Thank you again for the presentation.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Councilmember Humbert.
Yeah, I just wanted to quickly say thank you for the presentation and all the work that went into it.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Other comments?
Okay, yeah, I also want to just add my thanks.
Um, I I really do see the work that HR is doing, not only to receive a lot of applications and do outreach into the community to get more applications and strong applicants, um, but also in the retention work.
I think it's something that folks in the public don't get a chance to see very often.
Um, and I do really see you all trying to create a culture that helps people feel supported.
So I just want to thank you all for that.
And um, yeah, and thank you for the presentation as well.
Okay.
Um I don't think we need to actually vote to accept this report.
I think it's just is that right?
Could I get a motion to close the public hearing?
Or oh, I'm sorry, Monica.
We can, we should get to that.
Is there a motion to close the public hearing?
Uh the Berkeley Police Association would also like to present.
During the comment period, there was a we actually finished the comment period area.
Did you want to make a comment?
Yeah, oh yeah.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Yeah, so I was saying earlier that unions could have five minutes to speak during the comment period.
But do you want to you can just since we haven't closed the hearing, you should just go ahead and get your comment.
Thank you.
There's a presentation that uh monarch, are you able to put it up?
Thank you.
I'll go through this as quick as possible.
Uh thank you for the time, Madam Mayor and Council for uh hearing us out regarding our vacancies.
Uh looking at our current authorized versus actual vacancies, this is up to date current, not for 2025.
We're currently looking at 44 vacant sworn officer positions, two uh sworn sergeant positions for a total of 46 vacancies, uh much higher than the uh numbers from last year due to uh many factors.
That's based on our current authorized staffing.
Uh if you look at with uh we do have numerous trainees and people that have been hired and are in the academy currently or in the process.
Uh so that does boost us up to 15 uh sworn positions that are filled for officer.
Uh and so definitely that is in the works.
But as you can see, out of our 179 authorized positions, seven are currently vacant due to uh vacant frozen positions, and we currently have a total of 15 on both modified and workers comp.
Uh so basically working with a total of 66% of our actual authorized current staffing positions.
On the next slide, you'd be looking at what the uh proposed budget would do to our staffing based on the two uh possible scenarios, which would be a reduction of 32 positions for the worst case scenario, you'd be looking at a total of only 133 sworn positions, basically putting us almost at full staffing right now, which is our lowest staffing in my entire 15 years here.
Uh even with our um trainees and whatnot, we'd be pretty much approaching that.
The if the uh sales tax measure passes, we'd be losing a total of 17 positions, which would still put us at a total of 162 sworn positions with still numerous vacancies.
Some of our current staffing challenges is that uh we in 2020 had 174 sworn positions to compare to our current numbers.
In the past couple months, we've had one sergeant and six officers leave the department to join.
Um most of those joined San Francisco Police Department and want another police department.
Uh we currently are anticipating a handful more in the next few months to go to the San Francisco Police Department as well.
We have 19 current uh officers eligible to retire as of right now, with a total of about 25 by the end of the year.
And some of our other staffing challenges have been a long long-term struggle to recruit lateral police officers, which are quicker to get uh trained and onto the streets.
And we're currently at about uh 50 for 55% of our department has 10 years or less of experience, which is uh pretty much a low up in my career right now.
Uh next slide.
Uh this is looking at our current patrol our updated patrol staffing that will be starting in a couple weeks compared to April of 2021.
So in April 2021, we had 16 beats, now we have 14 beats.
Uh you can see there's been a 25% decrease in our patrol officers from 73 to 55.
In 2024, the city hired an outside uh company to do a workload survey, and 73 was the number that they recommended that we have as our patrol staffing, along with creating numerous other proactive positions and and things like that.
Regarding our workload, the good news about that is that uh since 2020 our calls for service and our case reports have stayed pretty steady.
But the bad is looking at our uh staffing numbers, officers will be responding to approximately 302% more calls for service in cases on a on a basis.
Uh what that means is that your patrol officers will have uh you know longer response times to these calls for certain lower call priority calls for services.
Uh you're gonna have less time for follow-up with victims, you're gonna have less time to do investigations.
Uh and from for me, some of the most important things, a lot less time to interact with the community on just a one-on-one basis to have you know downtime to talk with them and to conduct traffic enforcement.
If you have officers that are just on calls all day, you have no time for them to do any kind of interactions with the community besides going from call to call to call.
Our current hiring situation is we currently have one conditional offer to an entry-level police officer, uh, one entry level and one lateral officer in the background uh process, and we have police recruit interviews being conducted and a physical agility test scheduled for this week.
It's approximately about a three-plus month uh process to get people hired.
And when the police officer recruit is hired, it takes about six months uh for an academy and then a four-month field training program.
So all those recruits that we have hired right now, we won't see them probably till end of this year, next year actually working on the street, and they'll most likely just be filling positions that are people retiring and leaving this year.
Uh we can go to the next slide.
Some of our biggest recruitment challenges we're facing.
The main two are lack of industry standard tools and lack of opportunity due to our understaffing.
Most of when trying to recruit people from other departments, they're used to working with tasers, canines, and drone is first responder nowadays.
Um our lack of uh, you know, our understaffing leads to a lack of career opportunities.
Our investigations division, our traffic unit are both understaffed.
We currently don't have any kind of narcotics or special investigation unit, uh, and we don't participate in any of the county task forces.
Uh it's very difficult to recruit officers away from other departments.
If I can get like two one more minute almost.
I'm sorry, just I offered to give the unions five minutes.
I apologize that we didn't have this conversation beforehand.
Thank you.
Thank you though.
I really appreciate you giving us this presentation and folks have the slides here so we can look through them as well.
Thank you.
Um close the public hearing?
So moved.
Second.
Okay, can we take the role on that, please, Rose?
All right, to close the public hearing, Councilmember Castrowani?
Yes.
Taplin?
Yes.
Bartlett?
Yes.
Traegab.
Aye.
Oh, Keith.
Yes.
And Clerk, would you email me those slides, please?
Uh yes, we will do that.
Okay.
Um, so yes, Ro keep Blackaby.
Yes.
Munapara?
Yes.
Humbert?
Yes.
Mayor Ishii?
Yes.
Thank you very much.
Is there any public comment on items not listed on the agenda?
I don't know.
I don't know if it's permissible for me to speak on 12 since I wasn't here.
No, I'm sorry, we've already thank you.
Okay.
Anyone online?
No, hands raised online.
Okay.
Is there a motion to adjourn?
So moved.
Second.
Can you take the role, please, Rose?
To adjourn, Councilmember Casarwani?
Yes.
Taplin?
Yes.
Bartlett?
Yes.
Aye.
Oh, Keith.
Yes.
Rackaby?
Yes.
Munapara?
Yes.
Humbert?
Yes.
Mayor Ishii?
Yes.
All right.
Meeting is adjourned.
Thank you.
Recording stopped.
Berkeley City Council Meeting - April 21, 2026
The Berkeley City Council met on Tuesday, April 21, 2026, at 6:08 PM. The meeting included a report from closed session, adoption of the consent calendar with several legislative support positions, a public hearing on city vacancies and recruitment under AB 2561, and extensive public comment on non-agenda matters and consent items. Council members participated both in-person and remotely.
Consent Calendar
- Item 14: Support for SB 1301 (insurance non-renewal reform) – sponsored by Councilmember Tracub with co-sponsors Blackaby, Humbert, O'Keefe.
- Item 15: Support for SB 1257 (federal immigration enforcement report) – sponsored by Councilmember Tracub with co-sponsors Mayor Ishi, Lunapara, and added Casarwani.
- Item 16: Support for three environmental bills (SB 222, SB 868, AB 2389) – sponsored by Councilmember Tracub with co-sponsor Lunapara.
- Item 17: Setting measurable goals and metrics for key city priorities – sponsored by Councilmember Blackaby with co-sponsor Tracub.
- Item 13: Peace and Justice Commission item reaffirming commitment to international peace – Councilmember Humbert noted it was duplicative of prior council action; council agreed to take no action.
- Items 11 and 12: Peace and Justice Commission recommendations on flock safety and controlled weapons were moved to future meetings (May 7 and when items return from public safety committee).
- Item 2: Councilmember Bartlett's nomination to Police Accountability Board (Benjamin Nash) – acknowledged and approved as part of consent.
- Item 4: $9 million in state funds secured for affordable housing at North Berkeley BART station – acknowledged.
- Consent calendar adopted unanimously with amendment to take no action on item 13.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Non-agenda public comment:
- Rachel Barry (Root and Bloom Institute): Expressed concern about loss of nearly 50 parking spaces (including ADA) after a new traffic light at 6th and Bancroft; noted 16 months of emails with no traction and requested council support.
- Rolf Bell (26-year resident and business owner): Described impact on 30 small businesses and 16 residences from intersection reconfiguration; criticized lack of notice and inability to meet with Mayor Ishi or Councilmember Taplin.
- Lily Howell (parent of three): Opposed proposed elimination of Parks and Recreation therapeutic recreation program for children with disabilities; called it shameful in the birthplace of the disability rights movement.
- Della: Requested public reporting on causes of recent fires in Berkeley to help residents avoid hazards.
- Craig Nagasowa (property owner at 1201 6th Street): Described dangerous conditions from unhoused encampment including a fire that blistered his building; criticized city for allowing the person to return.
- Additional speakers supported Peace and Justice Commission's recommendations on flock safety (George Lippman, Wendy, Lisa).
- Consent calendar public comment:
- George Lippman (Peace and Justice Commission): Strongly opposed Flock contracts, citing data sharing with ICE, political corruption, and influence of Trump-supporting investor; urged council to be careful.
- Public hearing on vacancies (Item 18):
- Thomas Gregory (SEIU 1021 president): Stressed that eliminating 114 vacant positions (42 in his chapter) would permanently reduce city capacity for constituent services (planning, behavioral health, revenue collection).
- Berkeley Police Association representative (Monarch): Presented current sworn vacancies (46 vacant positions, 66% of authorized staffing); noted recruitment challenges (lack of tools, competition from SFPD) and proposed budget cuts that would worsen staffing; 19 officers eligible to retire.
Discussion Items
- Item 18: Public Hearing on Vacancies, Recruitment, and Retention (AB 2561)
- Presenter Monica Walker (HR) reported a 15% average vacancy rate citywide in 2025, with highest in small bargaining units (BFCOA, IBEW). The city received ~16,000 applications (12,000 unique) and filled 248 vacancies. Retention rate was 93%. Benchmarking comparable to other municipalities (14-20% vacancy). Councilmember Blackaby asked for follow-up on benchmarking retention.
- Councilmember Casarwani asked for clarification on retention calculation (retirements + voluntary separations divided by budgeted positions).
- Councilmember Humbert thanked staff for the presentation.
- Public hearing closed unanimously.
Key Outcomes
- Consent calendar adopted unanimously as amended (no action on item 13).
- Items 11 and 12 deferred to future meetings (May 7 and as scheduled from public safety committee).
- Public hearing on vacancies (Item 18) was held and closed unanimously; no formal vote required.
- Councilmember Tracub added co-sponsors on several items (Casarwani, Lunapara).
- Councilmember Humbert raised concern about duplicative item 13; council agreed to take no action.
- Meeting adjourned unanimously.
Meeting Transcript
Okay, hello everyone. Good evening. I am going to call to order the Berkeley City Council meeting. Today is Tuesday, April 21st, 2026, and it is 608 p.m. Thank you very much for your patience, everyone. Can we please start off with the roll? Certainly. And Mayor, before we get started with the role, Councilmember O'Keefe will be participating remotely under the Just Cause Provision of the Brown Act. So we're going to run through that script real quick. Councilmember O'Keefe is intending to participate in the meeting remotely pursuant to the Brown Act under the Just Cause justification. A quorum of the councils participating in person at a single physical location that is identified on the agenda, open to the public within the boundaries of the agency and meets accessibility requirements. This satisfies the requirements of the Brown Act. Councilmember O'Keefe has notified us of her need to participate remotely. Councilmember O'Keefe, if you would please provide a general description of the circumstances relating to your need to appear remotely, and you're reminded that you need not disclose any medical diagnosis, disability, or other confidential medical information. Yeah, thanks. I have a sick kid. Thank you. Councilmember O'Keefe, please disclose whether any other individuals 18 years of age or older are present in the room at your remote location and the general nature of your relationship with such individuals. Just a cat. He's under 18. Thank you. And council member O'Keith, you're reminded that you must participate through both audio and visual technology. Okay. I might turn off my camera briefly if I have to go check on my kid, but I'll be I'll be here. Thank you. All right. Um and we can go ahead and proceed with the roll. Councilmember Kessarwani. Here. Councilmember Taplin is absent. Councilmember Bartlett is absent. Councilmember Tracub. Thank you. O'Keefe. Here. Blackabee. Here. Moonapara. Here. Humbert. Present. And Mayor Ishi. Here. Thank you. Thank you so much, Rose. All right. So we have a quite lengthy report out from closed session. So please bear with me. It's a lot of letters and numbers. Item number one, the city council met in closed session on August 20th, 2026, pursuant to government government code section 54956.9 subsection D, and provided directions to outside council and approved a settlement by compromise and release as to a workers' compensation matter assigned claim number BER 220002 and WCAB case number ADJ 15513397.
openpublica.com