STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
The Bloomington Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) convened on Thursday, July 24, 2026, at 6:28 PM local time to hear three expedited petitions, three regular petitions, and one continuance. The meeting covered conditional uses, variances for driveway width, impervious surface, sidewalk installation, build-to line, and sign standards. The board also addressed a public notification defect and received public testimony.
I'm gonna call to order this meeting of the Board of Zoning Appeals for Thursday, July 23rd, 2026. We're gonna take the roll. Please call the roll. Smith. Here. Burrell. Here. Cosinko. Here. Throckmorton. Here. Did we have minutes that were distributed? I did not see them. Yes, I believe there were. Was it just for the last meeting? Yes. From the June 25th meeting. June 25th. Is there a motion to approve the June 25th minutes? Motion to approve June 25th. Second. I have a second. Uh call the roll. Burrell. Yes. Could Senko? Yes. Smith. Abstain. Throckmorton. Yes. All right. So what we'll what we're gonna do here is go through the reports, resolutions, and communications and um from the staff. Do we have any at this moment? Um just one. Um and it is uh in regards to the um uh kind of technically the third petition that is on the agenda tonight, or I'm sorry, the fourth petition that is on the agenda. Uh I'm so sorry. Thirdly rephrase that. Uh we have two cases on the expedited agenda. Um, and then at the beginning of the regular agenda, there is a petition for 716 South High Street. Um, so we have a notice from an adjacent property owner um that the sign that is required to be placed on the property um was not visible um from high street uh at least 21 days prior to the hearing date. Um so in the uh section of the code UDO that talks about um defects in public notification requirements. Uh it does talk about that appearance at any hearing on a petition or proposal uh in person or by representative shall waive any defect and notice unless the alleged defect is raised at the beginning of the hearing. Um so the petition uh the adjacent property owner is simply notifying that at the beginning of the hearing uh that this defect did occur and did not does not therefore waive uh their rights. Um the petitioner uh did give us the affidavit stating that they did mail the public notice letters and did post a sign. Um so we are just simply um relaying to the board that uh an adjacent property owner did not observe the required sign at least 21 days. They uh an adjacent property owner didn't happen to observe it 21 days in advance. They they did not observe the sign being placed prior 21 days prior to um the hearing. And has that uh resident have they requested us to continue this because of that? Um they they have not.