Bloomington Common Council Special Fiscal Committee Meeting - August 22, 2025
Bloomington Common Council Special Fiscal Committee Meeting - August 22, 2025
This special fiscal committee meeting of the Bloomington Common Council focused on the 256 budget process, review of the Office of the Mayor and City Clerk budgets, public comment, and planning for a special work session. The committee reordered the agenda to discuss budget follow-up first due to a member's time constraint. Key discussions centered on the transition to outcomes-based budgeting, the granularity of program inventories, and the need for meaningful council input during austerity.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Chris Remgie, Greater Bloomington Chamber of Commerce: Expressed support for the direction of the budget process ("moving in the right direction") and emphasized not cutting deferred maintenance on city assets, calling it short-sighted and politically expedient.
Discussion Items
- Agenda Reorder: Councilmember Hobie Stasberg moved item 5 (plans to follow up on the 256 budget process) ahead of item 2 to accommodate Councilmember Isab Asari's early departure. The motion passed unanimously.
- Budget Process & Feedback: Councilmember Asari raised questions about meaningful council input, noting that current budget hearing formats do not allow sufficient debate. Deputy Mayor Gretchen Knapp explained the three-stage process (program inventory, outcomes, prioritization) and requested feedback on program granularity. She acknowledged that this year's software transition limited the ability to link programs to outcomes, but that the work is laying groundwork for future years. Councilmember Hopi Stasberg expressed comfort with the current level of detail but noted the challenge of knowing what questions to ask as a newer member. Councilmember Dave Rollo prioritized capital projects (e.g., a new fire station, road maintenance) and requested a ranking of discretionary capital and infrastructure priorities. The committee agreed that the Budget Task Force will continue long-term process work, while this committee focuses on immediate budget feedback.
- Office of the Mayor Budget Review: Deputy Mayor Nat presented the proposed 2026 budget line by line, explaining variances between actuals (2023-2024) and proposed amounts. Highlights included a reduction in consulting (civic brand project), an increase in advertising for a new website, and a productivity allowance for software subscriptions. The travel budget was set at $15,000, with a note that the mayor often pays for her own travel via Harvard grants. Questions arose about telephone line increases and motor repairs.
- City Clerk Budget Review: City Clerk Nicole Bolden presented her proposed 2026 budget, focusing on ordinance book costs (codified paper required by state code), legal services, and certifications for staff. A discrepancy was noted between budget book actuals and expense reports for book spending in 2023-2024. The clerk explained that books are only replaced as needed, and the budget anticipates worst-case scenario. Deputy Mayor Knapp confirmed no cuts were made to the clerk’s budget as it was already close to actuals.
- Elected Official Salary Ordinance: The committee tabled this item to the next meeting. Councilmember Rollo proposed a 2.7% cost-of-living increase (matching estimated 2026 CPI), but noted that if civilian city employees receive only 2%, the difference may be politically problematic. The committee will discuss further.
Key Outcomes
- The committee agreed to schedule a special work session during the week of August 25, 2025, to allow council to discuss budget questions and potential cuts before the September 12 advertising deadline and September 9 question response due date. A scheduling poll will be sent to members.
- The Budget Task Force will continue long-term work on outcomes-based budgeting; this committee will focus on immediate feedback for the current budget cycle.
- No formal votes were taken on the budgets; the review was educational. Clerk and Mayor budget line items will be further explored through written questions.
Meeting Transcript
So I'd like to call to order this meeting of the special fiscal committee of the Bloomington Common Council for Thursday, August 21st, 2025. While we have committee members, Hobie Stasberg, Isab Asari, and myself, this is about not Smith present. And then from the Office of the City Clerk, we have City Clerk. Nicole Bolden, Deputy Clerk, Safe McDowell. From the council office, we have Lisa Leonor, attorney. And then we have Deputy Mayor. Yeah. Matt. It's been a long way to. And we have control of Justin. So thank you all for being here. Thank you to any members of the public. Oh, and Councilmember Rollo is in the waiting room. So come in. We will have complete committee here. All right, I'd like to start by maybe moving things around a little bit on the agenda because I believe Councilmember Asari has to leave at 12. Is that still true? Yeah. Um so he is kind of our liaison between the uh fiscal committee and the budget task force. I wanted to move up item number five in the agenda. Um, which is plans to follow up on the 256 budget process. Um move that ahead of item number two, and then firstly down. Council member SRA. Yes. I will vote yes, Council Member Stasford. Yes. Okay. Thank you. Um because we were maybe getting ahead of ourselves on Monday at the first budget hearing, asking, well, how do what do we do now? How do we follow up? How do we get feedback process? Um, I wanted to kind of open that up. Um, and I know council member Asari has some ideas on that. So maybe I don't know if you want to go first, uh, Isok. And yeah, yeah. I mean, and and I think it's uh it may be more useful to hear from Gretchen and the controller. I mean, what is you know, I the question that that I think a lot of us have is like, what is what is useful and needful feedback at this time, um, you know, and and and what's the sort of um horizon of of impact there. Um that's in terms of I think the sort of process questions, right? And so so because in every single presentation, we've asked these questions about, you know, have we determined the outcomes correctly? Have we how do we present this, you know, those type of questions. Um, but then I think that there's also the question, and as we're doing it this year, what do we want to do between now and the time that we actually submit the um appropriation ordinance or whatever the ordinance is called, um uh in terms of discussions, because I mean, you know, the way that we've done the the budget hearings, we haven't given ourselves a lot of space really um to to sort of opine or to debate or discuss. Um, and so sort of I think those are those are the sort of two um uh question marks uh um for me. Um I said like I'm I'm very happy to write up like a white paper, for example, answer, you know, with with uh attempts of answering all of the questions that are laid out in the in the packet. Um yeah, so so first sort of what's what's helpful, what's needed, um and then thinking thinking ahead of this year specifically. Um well from my staff on Uncle first, and then you can go by thinking about our process. Sorry, there's somebody in the waiting room. I just want to make sure I get it in. Sorry, sorry, no problem. Um, you know, we don't need to answer each and every one of those questions in the budget board immediately because they're big long-term questions, but um, I think if we can all understand kind of the three stages of the process and the software, that will really help because if we do the first step right, the second step and the third step get much easier. Um, and so the first step that we have to get right is the program inventory.
openpublica.com