Bloomington Fiscal Special Committee Meeting - August 10, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Bloomington Fiscal Special Committee Meeting – August 10, 2026
The Fiscal Special Committee met on August 10, 2026, to receive an update from the City Controller on revenue and budget matters and to continue discussions on elected official compensation. The committee also heard public comment and planned future work.
Controller's Update
- City Controller Jeff McKim provided an update on the local income tax (LIT) and property tax situation.
- McKim noted that the city's ability to raise LIT is based on estimated adjusted gross income, which is uncertain due to lack of precise data from the state.
- The budget process timeline: informal budget presentations scheduled for August 17, 19, 24, and 26; official budget advertising by September 13; official budget hearing on September 23; final adoption on October 7.
- LIT countywide growth for 2027 is estimated at 5.38% compared to 2026. City-specific numbers not yet known; McKim used historical percentages with a 25% discount factor.
- Property tax: The net assessed value in Bloomington declined by $142 million from 2026 to 2027 due to new rental property exemptions under SEA 1. This disproportionately affects Bloomington as about 50% of assessed value is rental.
- Circuit breaker losses for 2027 are estimated to increase by 7% to $1.3 million, driven by the assessed value decrease.
- McKim noted that all these revenue numbers are preliminary and will be updated as more information becomes available.
Elected Official Compensation Discussion
- The committee reviewed updated guiding principles for setting elected official salaries, which were refined to three values: accessibility of public service, quality community service, and equitable pay, plus processes for informed decisions and transparency.
- Committee members voted unanimously to approve the new guiding principles.
- A comparison of council member salaries from other Indiana cities was discussed, including data for Bloomington, West Lafayette, Lafayette, Greenwood, etc.
- Councilmember Matt suggested using a ratio of mayor salary to council salary (e.g., 4:1) as a framework, arguing that other comparisons are not apples-to-apples. This idea received support.
- Councilmember Dave emphasized population as a relevant factor.
- It was noted that West Lafayette recently passed a salary ordinance for 2027 with an increase.
- The committee agreed to continue refining the comparison data and to consider the mayor-to-council ratio in future discussions.
Public Comment
- Kevin Keio provided detailed comments on the budget book and financial reporting. He pointed out discrepancies between the general fund comparison and the ACFR, noted that the budget book appendix does not include beginning/ending fund balances, and requested better disclosures and a fund flow chart. He urged the public to engage with the budget materials despite their complexity.
Key Outcomes
- The committee unanimously approved the updated guiding principles for elected official compensation.
- The controller will provide a one-page summary of the revenue updates and add it to the committee folder.
- The committee will meet next in September, with possible agendas including feedback on budget presentations and continued salary discussion, as well as a potential budget fair for public outreach.
- The idea of using an O'Neill graduate capstone class to develop an outcome-based budgeting framework was floated and will be explored.
Note: There is a discrepancy between the transcript date (August 7, 2026) and the provided meeting date (August 10, 2026). This summary uses the date provided in the instructions.
Meeting Transcript
I'll go ahead and call us to order then um fiscal special fiscal committee meeting on August 7th 2026. Mopy Stoffswork district free and chair. That is Bonnie Montsmith Tom. Jeff McKim, City Controller. Pauline Williamson, Deputy Clerk. Thank you. So perhaps this meeting can be relatively short today. I it's unfortunate that I think last time we talked about this. Council member Roth also wasn't here. Um, because I was looking forward to being able to have more sense of conversation on this, but anyway, our agenda uh is an update from the controller. Uh Jeff indicated that he had some things that he wanted to share with us this morning. Um, and then just looking at the elected official salary stuff in terms of comparison speech progress, but also this kind of larger question of where we go from here in light of budget stuff and in light of like not being able to decrease salaries once they're increased and and what everybody's thoughts are on this entire process right now this year. Um, Dave entered the lady in the case. Maybe he's here. Maybe this is the day that we don't let's really that's right, the real day Ralo as opposed to like a false day of Ralo or the AI avatar. That's right, the AI avatar gave us. Well, yeah, it's gonna be good videos too. So hi Dave, good morning. Hey folks. I'm so glad that you um so I was just going over the agenda review and approval. Um, we're gonna have an update from Jeff first. Uh he just wanted a few minutes, and then we're gonna talk about elected official salary stuff. And I think last time we talked about this, you weren't able to join us. So I'm really glad that you managed to log on today. Um, so as long as that looks fit to everybody. Great. Uh Jeff, why don't you go ahead and take it away with what it is that you want to share? Thank you very much. I have a couple of things, and the things keep keep getting added uh to the list of things I want to inform you about. The first thing I just wanted to do was really give uh councilmember Stasberg applause for an exceptionally well done and informative report on the lid issues that we're facing that you did a great job of distilling the all the stuff from AIM and Reedy in a way that was, I think, really useful to everybody. So thank you for that. Um I did there was one realized just today, this morning came to me. There was one comment I kind of wanted to add uh to the entire thing that I know Reedy mentioned, but um, it's just important to keep in mind as we move forward with all these numbers. The city's ability to raise list depend or the amount of money that the city uh can raise depends on basically a guess of the adjusted gross income of the city. Well, while for the full county, we know exactly what the AGI is. We know you know, basically to the dollar uh of what uh or very close of what accounting rate will bring in. The we really do not know what a city rate will bring in. And I think both AIME and REEDE are using different ways of getting the numbers, but ultimately it comes down to just estimating based on census data. So just kind of want to make make clear that there's a high uncertainty when we talk about the amount of money that specifically can be raised within the city. Just and and I think the really important thing to uh to mention about that is that just shows how broken the system is in that you all are being or possibly be asked to make these decisions with really very uh based on a new law, a new structure without the state having released any specific numbers that you can base your decisions. So I just kind of wanted to throw in that there is a big uncertainty factor there, bigger than uh for other uh layer related issues. Um the budget process. Uh just kind of wanted to put that in context a little as you know, the budget book and the raw data set have been released. Um, I encourage you to use the raw data set if if you if you're uh a fan of Excel and can do pivot tables, it's a really good way of doing um uh of kind of pouring through the uh the the budget proposal if you want uh additional information from the past added. I can do that. I mean it's it's it may take some effort, but you know, I want to make it useful. The budget presentations have been scheduled for August 17th, 19th, 24th, and 26th. And the reason why I mentioned that is that all of this the budget proposal, the budget book, the raw data set, and those budget proposal or budget presentations in August are all essentially informal or non-binding pre-work that we do with the budget. it's it's it may take some effort but you know I want to make it useful the budget presentations have been scheduled for August 17th 19th 24th and 26th and the reason why I mentioned that is that all of this the budget proposal the budget book the raw data set and those budget proposal or budget presentations in August are all essentially informal or non-binding pre-work that we do with the budget they're an opportunity for dialogue between the administration and the council on the budget and things really become official when the proposed budget is actually official officially advertised to the public uh it uh that will likely happen in early September it has to happen at least 10 days before the official budget hearing uh when the budget is advertised it becomes it becomes available on the state's gateway system and like I said that's kind of the the real first formal um action of the budget the official budget hearing for the budget is scheduled for Wednesday September 23rd at 630 p.m and again the budget has to be advertised at least 10 days before that so our advertisement will go out no later than September 13 um and then the final budget adoption is scheduled for Wednesday October 7th at 6 30 p.m so that's that's the budget process anybody having any kind of questions or anything you want to know about the sorry I just want my kind of fast so when you have to put the figure the proposal into gateway it would be 10 days but so September 13th is the latest okay it can be done earlier and it really 10 days before the official yes council Dave you have a your hand up yeah I do can you hear me? Yeah.
openpublica.com