OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Boca Raton CRA Regular Meeting – November 4, 2025: Public Comments on Downtown Projects, Brightline, and Camino Square

Boca Raton Public MeetingsTuesday, November 4, 2025
BodyBoca Raton, Florida
SessionBoca Raton Public Meetings
DateTuesday, November 4, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
19:36

Okay, let's call this meeting to order.

19:37

It is a Monday a Tuesday, November fourth, ten AM.

19:41

Welcome to the book Reton Community Redevelopment Agency.

20:06

Thank you all.

20:07

Ms.

20:08

Siddons, please call the roll.

20:10

Chair Wigter.

20:11

Here.

20:11

Vice Chair Thompson.

20:12

Thankful to be here.

20:13

Commissioner Drucker is absent.

20:15

Commissioner Knackless.

20:16

Here.

20:17

Commissioner Singer.

20:18

Here.

20:18

Chair Winkter, you have a quorum.

20:20

Very good, thank you.

20:21

Mr.

20:21

Sahini, are there any amendments to the agenda?

20:24

Mr.

20:24

Chair, there are no amendments.

20:26

Very well.

20:26

We have a very light agenda today.

20:29

There are no minutes to be considered since the meetings were just last week, nor are there any presentations today, nor are there any quasi judicial or related public hearings.

20:39

So we will open the floor to public requests of the CRA.

20:43

This is related to the downtown.

20:45

We have several cards.

20:46

Each person will be entitled to three minutes.

20:48

Please come to the microphone, state your name and address for the record.

20:52

And the first is Ms.

20:53

Pam Paschke.

21:03

I'm Pam Pashkey.

21:05

I live at 341 Southwest 2nd Street, just south of Palmetto Park Road.

21:10

I'm going to speak about the Camino Square project.

21:15

This is a major change to the development agreement that is proposed.

21:21

And I think it is unwise in my view.

21:24

But I'll let me just go through a few things.

21:26

So I'm not sure why the city staff blanketly just recommended this project.

21:32

It seems like city staff should be providing the city council with concerns about a project that might arise.

21:39

And I'm I'm not sure why they just seem to recommend everything.

21:43

That's the way it appears to me.

21:47

The eight-story buildings along the railroad tracks that are there right now, the Fitzgerald, were approved in 2018 with a promise to replace half of the parcel with low rise, three-story maximum buildings with retail and shops or whatever they were going to put in there.

22:06

Now they're proposing to put in eight-story buildings, and the property to the north are residential, multifamily, two-story buildings that this eight-story monstrosity would be in the backyard for.

22:20

And I ask all the people on the dais if you would like an eight-story building built right behind your house.

22:27

I don't think so.

22:30

At the meeting about three weeks ago, the attorney showed f pictures of a run-down shopping center.

22:37

Well, they have owned that parcel since 1984.

22:40

So why is it they're showing you pictures of what it looked like after they evicted everybody?

22:46

Yeah, it looked like hack, and it has it did for many years.

22:51

But they can't argue, oh, look what we're doing.

22:54

We're going to improve this so much because they're the ones who let it go to pot.

23:01

When the developer first applied to build these eight-story buildings along the the railroad that are now there, they said we will then build a shopping center, because that's what was there before for the area residents and other people to go to.

23:18

And now they're saying, oh, we can't find any tenants.

23:21

Well, I'm sure they could find tenants.

23:24

They just don't want to.

23:25

They argue, oh, it doesn't have good visibility from the road, but they didn't seem to think that was a problem back in 2018 when they applied for this project.

23:39

The other issue I wanted to address that that the lawyer brought up in her talk was about the $2 million that they spent on Camino Real.

23:49

And that was necessary for their project to be done, but they seem to think it's a contribution to the city.

23:55

Well, in reality, they didn't finish this project until after January 1, 2024.

24:02

So their taxes in 2024 were based on the low value of 12 and a half million dollars of the parcel.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Downtown Planning█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Transportation Safety███████████████████████24%
Public Engagement███████████████████20%
Procedural████4%
Economic Development████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Boca Raton Community Redevelopment Agency Regular Meeting – November 4, 2025

The Boca Raton Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) held a regular meeting on November 4, 2025, beginning at approximately 10:00 AM (agenda listed 9:30 AM) and adjourning at 10:43 AM. The meeting had a light agenda with no minutes, presentations, quasi-judicial hearings, or resolutions. The primary activity was public requests (comments) from residents, followed by a report from Chair Marc Wigder on CRA initiatives and downtown planning. Commissioner Yvette Drucker was absent.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Pam Paschke (341 SW 2nd Street) spoke against the proposed Camino Square development, arguing that an eight-story building would negatively impact neighboring two-story residential properties. She questioned why city staff recommended the project and disputed the developer’s claims about $2 million spent on Camino Real, noting property taxes increased after the project completion.
  • John Perlman (498 NE A Street) discussed a recent Atlantic article about Brightline's safety record, stating the train killed 41 people last year (none ruled suicides), compared to 6 deaths on the Long Island Railroad. He criticized the city's financial support for Brightline (e.g., $7 million for a platform, $8.5 million for a garage) given Brightline's financial struggles—$549 million loss last year, missed bond payments, and junk bond rating (BB- by S&P Global).
  • Richard Warner (1322 SW 9th Terrace) criticized the city's outreach to the Hamptons as embarrassing and questioned if development was based on Brightline station or growth promotion. He asked how $70,000 taxpayer dollars were spent without a council vote.
  • Mike Liebelson (398 NE 3rd Court) commented on Camino Square, calling for the attorney representing the developer to register as a lobbyist due to extensive ex parte communications. He also discussed the Save Boca petition election on January 13 and argued that the Terra Frisbee government campus deal should be tabled until new council members are seated.
  • Linda Free (871 NW 6th Drive) compared Fort Lauderdale's development issues and questioned why public land should be used for development when private land is available. She noted Terra Frisbee downsized the project but added a hotel back.
  • Steve Zumtobel (840 Leander) expressed sympathy for residents in Camino Gardens and Carriage Hill, citing gridlock and inability to ingress/egress. He criticized the proposed density on Palmetto and the planned government campus development.
  • Martha Parker (64 NW 7th Street) highlighted that Brightline has a right of first refusal on two parcels of land adjacent to the downtown library. She noted that the first communication with Brightline regarding these parcels was made only recently, questioning the timing and transparency.
  • Tim White (451 NW 14th Avenue), a recent retiree from Northern Virginia, expressed concern about overdevelopment, traffic congestion, and loss of green space. He urged caution in preserving fields for youth sports.
  • Barry Freeman (6300 NW 2nd Avenue) recalled Mayor Singer promising to rein in overexpansion during his 2004 campaign but now sees cranes and congestion everywhere, asking when it will stop.
  • Naomi Hassick (1180 S Ocean Blvd) said traffic is already severe, allowing 45 minutes to cross from the ocean to Military Trail, and warned against becoming like Miami or Fort Lauderdale.

Discussion Items

  • Chair Marc Wigder delivered an extensive report on the CRA’s work, focusing on downtown planning, mobility improvements, and the transit-oriented development (TOD) around the Brightline station. He acknowledged public concerns about traffic and density but explained that the CRA is exploring mixed-use development, parking hubs, and alternative transit (Boca Connect shuttle, autonomous vehicles). He proposed a pilot project to reduce Meisner Boulevard from four lanes to two lanes with a bike lane, noting traffic counts are half of original expectations. He emphasized the need for infrastructure upgrades (pipes, lift stations) regardless of whether the government campus project proceeds. He invited residents to engage in ongoing conversations and noted that the CRA is not just about one project.

Key Outcomes

  • No votes or formal decisions were taken during the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 10:43 AM to reconvene for a City Council workshop. Several follow-ups were suggested by the Chair: addressing Brightline’s right of first refusal concerns (asked for offline conversation), and reviewing traffic signal timing at Palmetto Park Road railroad crossing.

Note: There is a discrepancy between the agenda listed start time (9:30 AM) and the transcript’s opening (10:00 AM). The minutes were unavailable.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, let's call this meeting to order. It is a Monday a Tuesday, November fourth, ten AM. Welcome to the book Reton Community Redevelopment Agency. Thank you all. Ms. Siddons, please call the roll. Chair Wigter. Here. Vice Chair Thompson. Thankful to be here. Commissioner Drucker is absent. Commissioner Knackless. Here. Commissioner Singer. Here. Chair Winkter, you have a quorum. Very good, thank you. Mr. Sahini, are there any amendments to the agenda? Mr. Chair, there are no amendments. Very well. We have a very light agenda today. There are no minutes to be considered since the meetings were just last week, nor are there any presentations today, nor are there any quasi judicial or related public hearings. So we will open the floor to public requests of the CRA. This is related to the downtown. We have several cards. Each person will be entitled to three minutes. Please come to the microphone, state your name and address for the record. And the first is Ms. Pam Paschke. I'm Pam Pashkey. I live at 341 Southwest 2nd Street, just south of Palmetto Park Road. I'm going to speak about the Camino Square project. This is a major change to the development agreement that is proposed. And I think it is unwise in my view. But I'll let me just go through a few things. So I'm not sure why the city staff blanketly just recommended this project. It seems like city staff should be providing the city council with concerns about a project that might arise. And I'm I'm not sure why they just seem to recommend everything. That's the way it appears to me. The eight-story buildings along the railroad tracks that are there right now, the Fitzgerald, were approved in 2018 with a promise to replace half of the parcel with low rise, three-story maximum buildings with retail and shops or whatever they were going to put in there. Now they're proposing to put in eight-story buildings, and the property to the north are residential, multifamily, two-story buildings that this eight-story monstrosity would be in the backyard for. And I ask all the people on the dais if you would like an eight-story building built right behind your house. I don't think so. At the meeting about three weeks ago, the attorney showed f pictures of a run-down shopping center. Well, they have owned that parcel since 1984. So why is it they're showing you pictures of what it looked like after they evicted everybody? Yeah, it looked like hack, and it has it did for many years. But they can't argue, oh, look what we're doing.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com