Boca Raton City Council Special Workshop on FY 2026-27 Budget - June 18, 2026
Boca Raton City Council Special Workshop on FY 2026-27 Budget - June 18, 2026
The Boca Raton City Council held a special workshop on June 18, 2026, from 1:30 PM to 3:30 PM, to discuss the preliminary proposed budget for fiscal year 2026-27. No decisions were required; the workshop aimed to provide an early overview, discuss key assumptions, and gather council feedback ahead of public hearings in September. Staff emphasized the city's strong financial position and that the budget reflects policy priorities.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Andrea Levine O'Rourke (former council member, 100 SE 5th Ave): Urged that arts and culture be treated as essential assets, not optional amenities, noting their economic impact and role in community identity. Advocated for adding a Department of Cultural Affairs and maintaining nonprofit grants.
- Joanna Marie Kay (executive director, Festival of the Arts Boca, 6325 Las Flores Dr): Requested continued city support at the same level for the past five years, stating that the festival is an economic driver and that artist contracts are stalled pending city funding decisions.
- Brianna Hagquist (with gopher tortoise mascots): Asked for clarification on funding between the Greater Boca Raton Parks and Recreation District and the city, specifically regarding Sugarsand Park and wildlife habitat.
- Mike Liebelson (398 NE 3rd Ct): Stated that property tax collections have grown 49.4% ($46.8M) since FY2022 while population grew only 2% and inflation 9.4%, and general fund expenditures grew 26% ($51M). Argued for expenditure growth tied to population plus inflation and for using EPC contractors instead of separate engineering consultants.
- John Anderson (290 W Palmeadow): Questioned the applicability of the CRA to Boca Raton, called for more boat ramps, criticized privatization trends, and said the fire assessment fee shift means the city is not budgeting properly.
- Jonathan Ungie (6501 Congress Ave): Argued the city should focus on growing revenues through strategic development rather than only cutting budgets, and that development has been limited.
- Martin Bell (761 SW 3rd St): Questioned the timing of real estate purchases, suggested using excess city assets for a dog park, praised the Boca El Rio Trail, and criticized the $150M bond placeholder for Memorial Park as inaccurate. He also urged against subsidizing public companies and requested clarification on the budget deficit figure.
Discussion Items
- Millage Rate and Property Tax Revenue: Staff proposed keeping the operating millage rate unchanged at 3.6476 and decreasing the debt service millage by 0.001, resulting in a total decrease of 0.001. The rolled-back rate (to collect the same revenue as prior year) was calculated preliminarily at 3.5548, based on proposed SB4F legislation. Under the proposed rate, a home valued at $500,000 with a $50,000 exemption would pay $1,648.76 in city taxes. The increase in assessed valuation is approximately $2.48 billion, a 6.19% rise (1.43% from new construction). The difference between the proposed rate and the rollback rate would yield about $4 million in additional revenue. Total ad valorem tax increase from FY26 to FY27 is estimated at $8.2 million (including new construction).
- Fire Assessment Fee: Staff proposed increasing the residential fire assessment fee from $155 to $224 to fund full staffing of Fire Station 8 and additional EMS captains. The increase is partly due to rebalancing costs based on calls for service, resulting in lower fees for many commercial properties. The last fee increase was in 2022 when residential rates went from $145 to $155. Councilmember Grau noted that Boca Raton's fees are lower than comparable cities (e.g., Boynton Beach $365, Fort Lauderdale $365).
- New Positions: The general fund request includes 12 firefighters, 4 lieutenants, 4 EMS captains, and 1 vehicle technician for Fire Station 8 (about $3.8M), plus a budget analyst. Other funds request 4 police officers for the CRA (focus on unhoused population) and 3 positions in water/sewer. Staff noted that many other new position requests were not included to balance the budget.
- Memorial Park Enhancements: A $7.5 million allocation from land proceeds fund is proposed for FY27 to plan, design, and begin work on civic buildings (City Hall, community center), historic buildings, tennis center, and utilities. Councilmember Pearlman questioned the $7.5M figure, calling it outlandish given past spending on police station plans. Staff clarified that the amount includes actual work (e.g., ADA upgrades, climate control) and is a five-year budget placeholder; no spending authorization exists. Councilmember Drucker noted that the preliminary CIP book includes specifics like the Singing Pines assessment ($1.5M) and that the project is not a one-year effort.
- Capital Improvement Program (CIP): Staff highlighted 12 major projects for FY27, including $25.83M for wastewater upgrades, $14M for water treatment improvements, $12M for downtown railroad pedestrian crossing evaluation, $10M for railroad crossings (Jeffrey Street and 28th Street closure), $8M for city services building renovations, $7M for municipal fleet garage, $7M for meter reading technology, $5M for Spanish River underpass, $4M for roof replacements, and $3M for police services facility. Councilmember Pearlman expressed concern that the total capital outlay for FY26 (approved) and FY27 (proposed) is $575 million, with additional bond plans for police station ($120M) and Memorial Park ($150M), potentially nearing $1 billion. He argued that the focus on the general fund is misleading and that the depletion of fund balances ($295M over two years) is irresponsible given the pending property tax reform.
- Fund Balance and Reserves: Staff presented that the general fund budget shows a net increase of $180,900, maintaining a 10% fund balance plus a hurricane disaster reserve. However, across all city funds, the proposed capital plan would reduce total fund balances from $711.8M to $415.9M, a decline of $295M. Councilmember Pearlman emphasized that this is a depletion of rainy day funds while the state tax reform could significantly reduce future revenues.
- Internal Audit: Deputy Mayor Grau suggested establishing an independent internal auditor reporting to the council, noting that Delray Beach has such a position. City Manager Zervis explained that the current internal audit function is within the finance department and not independent. He offered to study the feasibility and cost of a dedicated internal auditor or outsourced firm.
- Other Items: Councilmember Grau asked about recreation cost recovery, beautification spending, economic development fund subsidy, office of emergency management consolidation, and AI use for efficiency. Staff responded that the beautification fund is being folded into public works, economic development fund has sufficient balance, and emergency management moved to fire rescue. Councilmember Sipple questioned the decrease in CDBG and SHIP funds (79.4% drop in housing assistance trust); staff will follow up.
Key Outcomes
- No formal votes were taken. The workshop is the first step in the budget process; staff will incorporate council feedback and return with a refined budget for public hearings in September.
- Staff will provide follow-up information on: recreation cost recovery, library branch costs, beautification spending breakdown, internal auditor feasibility, AI use policy, and CDBG/SHIP funding changes.
- The proposed fire assessment fee increase and new positions will be further discussed with stakeholders, including the fire union and business community, before formal adoption.
- Councilmembers expressed differing views on spending priorities: some emphasized maintaining services and low millage rates, while others called for significant cuts in the CIP and fund balance preservation in light of potential property tax reform.
- The meeting adjourned at 3:30 PM.
Meeting Transcript
I'd like to welcome everybody to a special workshop meeting of the Booker's own City Council related to our budget. The date is June 18th, 2026. The time is now 1.30 in the P.M. I'd ask everybody to please rise and stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. Pledge of allegiance. Thank you. Ms. Siddons, could you please do the roll? Mayor Thompson. I am here. Deputy Mayor Grow. Here. Councilmember Drucker. Here. Councilmember Perlman. Councilmember Sepple. Present, all present. Excellent. We're here today to discuss the fiscal year 2026-2027 budget. And I would ask the city manager if he could please introduce the staff person who will be making the presentation today. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, and uh good afternoon. Um before I turn it over to our Deputy City Manager and CFO, Mr. Zervis and the and the finance team, I'd like to take a few moments moments to discuss the purpose of today's workshop, where we are in the budget process. Uh first of all, no decisions are required today. This workshop is intended to provide council with an early overview of the proposal fiscal year 2627 budget, discuss key assumptions and priorities, and provide an opportunity for questions and discussion. We are intentionally bringing the workshop forward earlier than many local governments. By starting the conversation now, we've got additional time to review the budget together, receive council feedback, evaluate potential adjustments, and ensure there are no surprises as we move forward later in September to adoption. For our newer council members, today's workshop is also intended to provide an insight into the city's budget development process. The budget is developed over many months and reflects extensive work by our departments, their directors, financial staff, executive leadership. While budgets are often viewed as financial documents, they are really policy documents that reflect council priorities and determine how resources are allocated to deliver services to our residents. Today's workshop is intended to help council understand not only where the city finances stand today, but also the service demands, operational needs, and long-term investments that shape the budget. As you will see today, the city remains in a strong financial position. Staff continues to focus on maintaining high service levels, investing in critical infrastructure, and supporting public safety, and preserving the city's long-standing commitment to fiscal responsibility. Uh a lot of months in advance. That has to be done in July. So typically we would be coming forth in July to give an update on the budget in preparation for adoption in September. We backed it up a little bit this year and started earlier. Really anticipating having a new city council to work with, wanting to make sure that we were aligned in our focus on the budget development process with the desire of the city council. And so we wanted to make sure we had plenty of time to get any feedback that you may have in this process ahead of having to prepare those documents for the county in July and then be ready to come back in September with a thoughtful and complete budget package for your consideration. So that's that's setting the context a little bit just to let you know we are about a month ahead of schedule. It coincidentally kind of falls in line with property tax reform. That wasn't the intent when we set the budget date. That's just when the special session moved forward and and uh you know triggered the legislation that you know I did a report to your council on last week. So this is not in response to property tax reform. Property tax reform, if approved by the voters, uh won't impact the city's budget until the following fiscal year. So it doesn't impact this fiscal year. Uh that would be 0708 and then 0809. So just um just kind of letting you know, you know, the plan when we talk about uh how do we respond to if that legislation is passed by voters and is implemented, um, we do have time to consider uh policy direction on and how we address that. And I laid out several options for you at the last council meeting.
openpublica.com