Boston City Council Regular Meeting - June 10, 2026
Colleagues and those in attendance to please silence their cell phones and electronic devices.
Also pursuant to Rule 42, I remind all in this chamber that no demonstration of approval or disapproval from members of the public will be permitted, including but not limited to signs, placards, banners, cheering, clapping, booing, etc.
And if such demonstrations are made, the gallery or public seating area will be cleared.
This rule will be strictly enforced.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please call the role to ascertain the presence of a quorum?
Councillor Braden.
Here.
Councillor Colletta's a father.
Councilor Culpepper.
Councilor Durkin.
Councilor Fitzgerald.
Councillor Flynn.
Council Luigian.
Councilor Mejia, Councillor Murphy, Councilor Pepin.
Councilor St.
Anna.
Counselor Weber.
And Council World.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
I've been informed by the clerk that a quorum is present.
Mr.
Clerk, would you do us the honor of offering an invocation for us today?
And following that, we will cite uh the Pledge of Allegiance.
Thank you, Council.
Good morning, everyone.
Please stand.
Let us pray.
Somewhere at our innermost core, each of us wants to submerge self-interest so that we may do that which is right.
To promulgate justice tempered by mercy.
But this is not always an easy path for human, all too fallible men and women.
Knowing this, we ask today for patience that we may diligently weigh conflicting evidence and find the right therein.
We ask for tolerance, that we may truly hear and consider opinions unlike our own.
We ask for wisdom that we may recognize the face of truth when it appears before us.
All this we ask in the name of that eternal creative spirit, that supreme power that guides us all, whatever our traditions to act in ways that are loving, wise, and just so be it forever and ever days without end.
Amen.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, to the Republic for which is one nation under God, indivisible within the injustice.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Um we have two presentations today.
So first I will call up uh Councillor Santana.
Uh, if what for your presentation, you've got five minutes, and then follow that we have Councilor Mejia.
Good afternoon.
Happy pride, everyone.
Um I would like to be able to thank you, Madam President, for this opportunity.
I would like to call up some of the speakers that I'm uh I'll be having today.
Um Christian, Tina, and Ricardo, if they can come up.
Um, and we'll be hearing from them.
Um happy pride, everyone.
Um, as you all know, um uh today uh alongside with 35 organizations, um 35 plus organizations uh we're hosting a pride celebration um and this is not about me.
Um as I mentioned it to you all.
I already want to be able to hear directly from the speakers.
Um, so first we're gonna have um Christian uh we're gonna hear from Tina and then we'll close it out, um, with Ricardo, and then we're gonna invite all my council colleagues and everyone here um celebrating pride to come up for their picture.
Without further ado, um Christian.
Good morning, everyone, greetings, earthlings.
My name is Christian Gardet, also known as stage name Freckles, which stands for freedom, recognition, compassion, knowledge, love, support, music.
Um I'm grateful to be here today and have this opportunity to share with you some of my experiences.
Um to start, um, I was born in the city of Boston.
Um I was adopted um at the age of five.
I was moved to the Merrimack Valley uh region area and raised in that area.
Um upon my adolescence, I struggled very much with my identity.
I struggled with um connecting with my peers in many ways due to just a lot of things paired with the intersections of um not having contact with biological family and things like that.
Which led me to a lot of stuff and wound me up at 17 and incarcerated in MCI Framingham.
I did about four years incarcerated there.
And that's truly where I met my first transgender person, which shifted my in shape the way that I could start to see myself.
And as I integrated back into this community in Boston, family health was a huge resource to me.
And I struggled immensely because I am a former addict.
I was born addicted to substances.
I work with kids inpatient with McLean through Franciscan children's.
Every day that I'm seeing the things that I had experienced as a kid in my own youth and adolescence is trickling down into their lives as well through everything that's happening today.
And as a queer person of color, I first hand know how visibility and belonging are not always the same thing.
That there have been times when I've been welcomed into spaces because of one part of my identity, while other parts of me remained unseen.
For many BIPOC LGBT plus people, that is a reality we all know too well.
We often exist in an intersection of multiple forms of marginalization, carrying experiences that are unique communities in our cultures.
And my work as an artist here, a mental health specialist, a recovering addict, a formerly incarcerated individual, have been rooted in healing storytelling, creating space for people who don't feel seen.
Through my music and my art, it's not to entertain, it's to create space, it's to create a conversation.
And what I've learned is that being queer looks different depending on where you come from.
It's not about the color of your skin.
And the culture or your faith and your socioeconomic background.
We can't talk about our experiences as LGBT individuals if we're not including all of that in a whole in a whole spectrum.
Sorry, I'm neurospicy.
I lost my space here.
And this is why the representation matters, and that's why our community matters, and that's why collective consciousness matters.
And every day I see young people carrying unimaginable burdens that I did not have to carry as LGBT youth.
I didn't have to deal with an administration and the burdens of that in my youth.
Some are struggling with anxiety, depression, trauma, family rejection, housing instability, bullying, and simply the exhaustion of feeling like they have to hide who they are to be accepted.
I've sat with young people who have never heard someone tell them that their identity is not something that needs to be fixed.
I watch what happens to these kids every single day in and out.
And they are the reason that I drive to do what I do in this community is the reason that I want to connect with more people.
It is the reason that I need to talk to as many people as I need to to hear where there's lack of, where there's misinformation, where people are missing, missing, missing certain very significant points when it comes to identity.
These young teachers these young people teach me and how to refine and redefine belongingness, how to recreate that conversation because we're all changing every single day.
And the goal isn't just to be seen, it's to be supported.
It's not just to make statements about support, it's to put action behind that.
And the goal is to create communities where BIPOC, queer, disabled people, immigrants, all marginalized communities can have access to that safety, opportunity, mental health resources, leadership roles, spaces where they can thrive.
Pride became as a movement demanding dignity and humanity.
And today that work needs to continue.
It needs to continue to uplift.
My hope is that young people can feel different, and every person who has questioned whether they belong can look at the people in the rooms and know that there's a place for them.
Not because they earned it, not because they had to prove themselves, not because that they are not worthy, but because they do belong there.
Um I just want to say thank you for my time.
Hi, I'm Tina Jushi Caruso.
I am a MassArt alum, and I am a queer BIPOC person who's an immigrant who was adopted at 11 months from China, and I have I just was out, I've been out and proud for two years.
I went to Mass Art.
It was the first time I saw people like me, BIPOC and queer people.
It was the first time I found community.
Mass art was a pivotal moment for me.
You might have seen me on Love on the Spectrum.
I came out a little before that at MassArt.
Through that, I realized there's a community here in Boston that I belong to.
I have never felt belonging like the queer community in Boston.
I grew up in some of the outplaced by some of our school districts.
I was placed into schools that my mom called were equivalent to Arkansas's, Southern, um, Arkansas's like Southern schools, where I was racial racially, I could not be myself.
I was ta always targeted by teachers as well as fellow students.
I got bullied for being a transracial adoptee.
I could not be a BIPOC person.
Let alone I did not even know I was queer at the time.
All I knew by high school, I was an ally to this community.
I did not realize until two years ago, 2024, that I was part of this queer community, and I am so excited to be able to represent this community, and I hope to uplift your voices, and I want to say as a queer artist myself, that funding and budgeting is very important to this community because a lot of us are also artists and we want to do the best work, and when we don't have the resources, we can't do what we need to do best.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Can you hear me back there?
All right.
Uh thank you, Boston City Council, for making space for our community to be seen and celebrated in the city we call home.
Let me just start by saying that I love queer people.
I do.
I love us, I love our tenacity and our creativity.
I love the way that we find each other.
I love chosen family.
I love the way we build joy in spaces that were not built with us in mind.
I love who we are, and I love the license we give people to be a little bit more of themselves when we shine extra bright.
Pride, it means different things to different people.
For some, it means marching, for others, it means quiet reflection, a private accounting of how far we've come and how far we've yet to go.
Pride is visibility, it is action, it is care, it is chosen family and courage that surprises you when it shows up.
It doesn't have to be all of those things at once, and it should never come at the cost of who we are.
I want to be honest about what pride feels like in a moment like this.
We're living through a sustained and intentional attack on LGBTQ plus lives, on our health care, on our bodies, on our children's ability to learn and grow in safety, our trans people's uh very right to exist in public life, to be recognized, to be named, to move through the world as who they are.
The cruelty is not incidental, it is the point.
And what I want us to name something clearly is that it's not something we brought upon ourselves.
It is harm that has been forced upon us by others' obsession with our bodies, with who we love, or whether our families meet some unattainable standard.
We did not choose to fight, but you better trust and believe that we know how to do it.
I have always understood advocacy as personal.
I think of the people that I worked alongside in Arizona, in Texas, in Ohio, in Maine, in New York, and what I hear over and over is not a radical demand.
It's a yearning, a yearning for a fair shot at a good life.
The ability to marry if we choose, to build families, if that's part of our path, to have identity documents that reflect who we are and let us move through daily life without unnecessary barriers.
To live in cities and states with real non-discrimination protections, to have safe schools, places where young queer people have access to the same experiences as any other kid, to have childhoods that are not burdened by questions of safety, not spend calculating how much of themselves they need to hide to feel a sense of false belonging.
I think about the families who left Texas, who left Florida, who found what felt like safety in cities like Boston, and who are now asking whether they need to leave this country entirely.
I think about parents working deliberately, creatively to build pockets of joy for children, navigating a world that doesn't always feel that was made for them.
Even here, even in Boston, what some consider a beacon of LGBTQ safety, there are queer people who do not feel seen, who do not feel heard, who are honestly not up to the task of performing resilience.
Many of us are tired, tired of fighting every day, tired of two step forwards and one or two steps back, tired of being asked to show up to city council pride celebrations after being cut from a budget.
That exhaustion, that anger and frustration is real, and it belongs in this room, it deserves to take up space, so it doesn't live within us.
I'll say something else that is true for me personally.
I don't need everyone to accept me.
I accept myself, my mother who leads a prayer circle every week and prays for LGBTQ people, accepts me, and that is not nothing, that is everything.
And I have stopped letting the people who refuse to see me determine how I see myself.
That clarity, knowing who I am, knowing who you are, when others insist you are something else or something less, is not just survival, it's our superpower.
It is the thing that no executive order can take away from you.
And when I look around this room, that is what I see multiplied by hundredfold.
I look around and I see community leaders and so many others, I see organizations across the city that have shown up for LGBTQ people, for immigrants, for people living with disabilities, for young people, for elders, with consistency, love, and care.
Often on tiny budgets, always on behalf of people who deserve much more than they are given.
The richness of what is in this room is extraordinary.
You are the people who give me real confidence about the future that we are building together.
And this moment is asking all of us to show up differently, with uncommon courage, with conviction, with pride in who we are and valor in what we do.
It is asking our organizations to lead with authenticity, even when that is the harder path.
But it is asking something of our allies and institutions too.
It is asking you to meet us in the ring, to be clear-eyed about your values and the world you are helping us to create, to say the word trans, to not dodge questions about your support for our community, to be relentless in your pursuit of restoring funding to the office of LGBTQIA to US plus advancement, to the Office of Immigrant Advancement, to black male advancement, housing, to youth jobs, to double down on what you say you believe when the pressure is highest, not walk away from it, to fuel this necessary work with your time, your treasure, and your voice.
What I want, and what have what I've always wanted is for LGBTQ plus people and everyone in this city, regardless of who you are, regardless of where you come from, to have a real shot at a good life.
That is not a radical vision, that is the baseline.
But in the here and now, over the next 20 days of Pride Month, I want us to dance.
I want us to rejoice, I want our doors to open wide and to fully welcome the vibrancy and difference of our community.
I crave connection and joyful abandon.
I crave freedom and creativity, and yes, I crave being a nuisance to everyone who refuses to see us or pretend that we don't have a rightful place in this world.
Because we do.
We always have.
This Pride Month, choose to be whole, even in your grief for what we are experiencing right now.
And then shine.
Not despite everything, but because of it.
Because we will persist long after this administration.
We will deliver on the promise of this country for all of us.
For all who came after us.
We always will.
Happy Pride.
And please come over to the podium here.
Um we do it every single year.
We uh we'll pack the the chamber.
Um thank you so much for being here, but we'll now take a picture.
And um as folks are doing that, I'll just uh mention and I've said it multiple times today.
Um I know we have declared ourselves as a sanctuary city, um and we need to make sure that our policies um reflect that.
So I'm looking forward to working with my colleagues to push in policies.
Um, sanctuary city.
Thank you, everyone.
Do you have to stand on something?
Okay.
Should I go up front because I'm too short?
Sometimes I'll just go.
Are you ready to do that?
Yeah, yeah.
But we got ours today.
We have to be able to see if you got it, we can't go to that.
No, no.
I like it, thank you.
We're here, we're here.
Yeah, we are.
I think it's a very important one.
How are you?
Okay, very good.
Thank you.
I will now invite Counselor Mejia to come forward with her presentation.
You have the floor.
All right, y'all.
Good afternoon.
Okay.
So I would like to invite Napoleon Jones's uh Henderson's family here to the podium, please.
So make your way here.
Today I am proud to recognize June the 19th, 2026 as Napoleon Jones Henderson Day in the city of Boston.
That's right.
Occupy space, y'all, because this is what we do.
That's right.
Let them all know that we are here.
And this day is being declared as Napoleon Jones Henderson Day here in the city of Boston to honor a life that has left a lasting impact on generations of artists, students, and communities across our city.
That's right.
Member Council Braden said, no, shh, no, I don't want no problems up in here, okay?
Napoleon Jones Henderson was a mentor, a teacher, a builder of community who believed deeply in the power of art to uplift people and to tell our stories with dignity.
We are especially proud to recognize him on June the 19th, Juneteenth, because of the role he played in helping bring the celebration of the holiday to Boston through advocacy and deep commitment to black cultural expression.
Born in Chicago in 1943, he became an early member of the Afro Cobra, the groundbreaking collective rooted in black liberation and self-determination.
Boston became his home for more than fifty years after he moved here in 1974 to teach at Mass Art.
Through his work and mentorship, he helped shape Boston's art community into a space rooted in culture and connection.
And that is why this recognition matters so much right now.
They are an essential part to life and this city.
Napoleon Jones Henderson's legacy lives on through the countless people he inspired and uplifted throughout his life.
Today, alongside this resolution and legacy citation, we honor his extraordinary contributions to Boston.
At a time, at this time, I'd like to invite Akua Holmes to speak briefly on Napoleon's legacy and his contributions to bringing Juneteenth to the city of Boston.
Thank you.
Good morning, everyone.
My name is Aqua Holmes, and I'm I was one of those young people looking for spaces as an artist back in the 70s.
I was fortunate, like the person who presented earlier, to find my way to Mass Art.
And eventually that led me to Napoleon Jones Henderson, who came from Chicago to teach weaving.
He turned our world upside down because we had only heard about maybe two African American artists ever.
They weren't teaching it at our school, even though it was a Massachusetts College of Art and Design to represent all of the people, they weren't telling the whole story.
Napoleon came and started to fill in the pieces.
He taught us about an organization called the National Conference of Artists.
What does that mean?
It's the National Conference of Black Artists that met across the country annually to celebrate African American art, African art, writing, literature, culture.
We began to go to those conferences.
We met Romary Beardon.
We met Elizabeth Catlett, and those people became real to us.
They weren't just little postage size pictures in a book, they were real life people who were living as artists.
So when I stand here today, I know that I'm standing on the shoulders of people like Napoleon Jones Henderson.
To get back to Juneteenth, I never heard of Juneteenth when I was in my teens and twenties.
But Napoleon had a Juneteenth celebration at his home in Roxbury every year.
And his friends would come to Chicago and transform the place with music, with incense, with food, with art, and they would tell us about our own history that we did not know.
He was the first one to bring it here, and eventually the rest of us caught up with him.
And that's pretty much how it was with Napoleon.
He was 10 steps ahead, and we caught up with him all the time, even to the fact that he bought that mansion and envisioned it as a cultural museum for African Americans.
That was years ago, and it's it's happening.
After he left Mass Art in a couple of years, he could have gone on and done other things, gone to other institutions, left Boston.
But just as we had adopted him, he adopted us.
And he put down deep roots here.
And that same spirit of generosity that brought Juneteenth, that he brought Juneteenth here with, he continued to keep his doors open to artists of all ages and stages, not just young ones, but old ones too.
He would always be willing to teach you about weaving, about the ceramics that he did, and he always had something good on cooking in the kitchen.
Some people talk about the banana bread, some people talk about the beans and rice, and but even if you only got one shrimp, because it was kind of like, you know, Jesus and the loaves.
Maybe we started out with five people, but we end up with 15.
But we all left feeling fulfilled and nurtured and cared for.
When I drive up Cedar Street, even to this day, I look to my left, and I know that that's Napoleon's house.
And I was saying to someone today, he's still in our midst.
He's still influencing us, he's still caring about us.
Whatever the next realm is, I know he hasn't left us.
And we will celebrate Juneteenth in a much more bold way this year because he's left us physically, and we want to honor the fact that he was the first one to teach us about it.
Thank you so much.
Um, and I just want to also acknowledge that then former counselor Campbell, and myself, alongside uh Councillor then Kim Janey worked on having Juneteenth be a recognized holiday here in the city of Boston, so this even means more to me here today.
Um so I'd like to ask my colleagues to come and take a photo.
And I'll read the resolution while my colleagues make their way up here.
So this uh resolution uh is uh presented by me, Boston City Councilor at large, Lee Mihia via um the resolution that we're gonna be passing on the on the city council today is recognizing June the nineteenth, twenty twenty-six as Napoleon Jones Henderson Day here in the city of Boston, and every year I hope y'all are showing up in this chamber to honor his legacy.
Um and so without further ado, come and take a photo.
And can we clap it up one more time?
Everybody vote all the little shorties come up here.
Thank you, everyone.
Thank you, Councilor Mahia, Counselor Santana, for your presentations.
Mr.
Turk, could you please amend the attendance to recognize that Councilor Louis Jeanne, Councillor Culpeper, and Councillor Warrell have joined us?
Yes.
We're now on to the first order of business, which is the approval of the minutes from the meeting of June 3rd, 2026.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
The ayes have it, and the minutes of the June third meeting are approved.
We are now on to communications from our honor the mayor.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please read Docker 1181?
Document number one one eight one message in order authorizing the city of Boston to accept and expend the amount of one million dollars in the form of a grant.
Cummings Community Safety Grant awarded by Cummings Foundation Incorporated to be administered by the Office of Human Services.
The grant will fund and support the community safety initiative, Public Health initiative, community events initiative, and youth Engagement initiative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Councillor Murphy, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
I just rise to share some of the information of this million dollar grant, and I hope my colleagues will support in passing this today.
The FY27 Cummings Violence Reduction Gift Talking Points here.
So the city will be receiving from the Cummings Foundation for the following violence reduction and public safety initiatives to bolster Boston standing as the safest major city in the U.S.
The Boston Public Health Commission will receive funds across three main initiatives.
Domestic, sexual and gender-based violence, BPHC's data and evaluation systems, and life course unit, which is a violence reduction framework that integrates age group-based initiatives.
The BHA will receive some of these funds to scale Charlestown successful adult education center and re-entry model at the Mildred C.
Haley complex in Jamaica Plain.
Reducing transportation barriers from neighborhoods like Mattapan and responsive to the programs over subscribed wait list.
And then a smaller portion of the funds will support a mobile intervention unit that has served as a highly visible low barrier entry for clinical navigation, building on a model that has successfully placed hundreds from the Mass and Cass Region into recovery pathways.
So the acceptance of these installments moves the city away from isolated reactionary programming to sustain investments in root cause violence prevention, ensuring our neighborhoods and constituents remain safe, healthy, and supported all year.
So I'm asking my colleagues to suspend and pass today.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Um Councillor Murphy, the chair of the committee on human services, seeks suspension of the rules and passage of Docket 1181.
All those in favor say aye.
I doubt the vote.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 1181?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council of Braden, yes.
Councillor Color is a father.
Council Culpepper.
Councillor Culpepper, yes, Councillor Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Yes.
Council Fitzgerald, yes, Council Flynn.
Council Flynn, yes, Council.
Yes.
Council, yes, Council Mehia.
Council Mehia, yes, Council Murphy.
Yes.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council Pepin.
Council of Pen, yes, Council Santana.
Yes.
Counselor Santana, yes, Council Weber.
Council Weber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Counselor, yes.
Docker number one one eight one has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Could you please read Docker 1182?
Document number 1182, message in order authorizing the city of Boston, accepting expend the amount of three thousand two hundred and twenty dollars in a form of a grant.
The massability rehabilitation commission grant, awarded by Mass Higher Department of Career Services, to be administered by the Office of Workforce Development.
The grant will fund employment and training assistance, career counseling, and job search assistance for disabled individuals who are clients at Boston's Mass Higher Career Centers.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
The chair recognizes Council Rail, the Chair of the Committee of Lear on Labor and Economic Development.
Counselor, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President.
This is a very small dollar amount grant, valued at $3,220.
That would provide funding to operate the two mass higher one-stop US centers we have in Boston.
So just looking to pass the small dollar amount so we get much uh needed support over to the Mass Higher One Stop Career Center.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Uh the Council Warrell, the Chair of the Committee on Labor and Economic Development, seeks suspension of the rules and passage of Docket 1182.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Uh Mr.
Clerk, could you please uh take a roll call vote on Docket 1182?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council Brighton, yes.
Councillor Collar is a fire.
Council Culpepper.
Councilor Culpepper, yes, Councillor Durkin.
Counselor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Yes.
Council of Show, yes, Council Flynn, yes.
Counselor Flynn, yes, Council Louis Jean.
Yes.
Council, yes, Council Mehia.
Council Mehia, yes, Councilor Murphy.
Counselor Murphy, yes, Council Papen.
Council Papen, yes, Council Santana.
Yes.
Council Santana, yes, Council Weber.
Yes.
Council Weber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Yes.
Council, yes.
Docker number one one eight two has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Docker 1182 has passed.
We are now on to reports of public officers and others.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please read Docker's 1183 through 1185?
Docker number 1183.
No received from the city clerk in accordance with Chapter 6 of the ordinances of 1979 regarding action taken by the mayor and papers acted upon by the city council at its meeting of May 20th, 2026.
Docker number 1184.
Communication was received from Timothy Smith, Executive Officer of the Boston Retirement Board, regarding result of the election for a vacated for a vacant elected board seat.
Dennis Callahan was elected to serve as trustee of the Boston Retirement Board for a term ending January 15, 2027.
And document number 1185.
Communication was received from Council Flynn regarding protocol for the Boston Fire Department, Boston Police Department, and Boston Emergency Medical Services during the event of an elevator failure at Boston Housing Authority Developments.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Dockens 1183 through 1185 will be placed on file.
We're now on to reports of committees.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please read Docker 0796 through 1040?
Together, please.
To which was referred on April 15, 2026.
Docker number 0796.
Message in order for the confirmation of the reappointment of David Sampson as an alternate member of the Back Bay Architectural District Commission for a term expiring on December 31st, 2030.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Docker number 0797.
The Committee on Planning Development and Transportation was which was referred on April 15, 2026.
Docker number 0797.
Message in order for the confirmation of the reappointment of Robert Weintrabb as a member of the Back Bay Architectural District Commission for a term expiring on December 31st, 2029, submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Docker number 0798, the Committee on Planning, Development and Transportation, to which was referred on April 15, 2026.
Measures in order for the confirmation of the appointment of David Dixon as a member of the Boston Landmarks Commission for a term expiring June 30th, 2028.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Docker number 0799, the Committee on Planning Development Transportation, to which was referred on April 15, 2026.
Message in order for the confirmation of the reappointment of Kristen Hoffman as an alternative as an alternate member of the Boston Landmarks Commission for a term expiring June 30, 2026.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Docker number 0800, the Committee on Planning Development Transportation, to which was referred April 15, 2026.
Message and order for the confirmation of the appointment of Kristen Hoffman is a member of the four-point channel landmark district commission for a term expiring on June 30, 2026.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Docker number 1037.
The committee on planning, development, transportation, to which was referred on May 20th, 2026.
Message in order for the confirmation of the appointment of the Nick Gupta as an alternate member of the Boston Landmarks Commission for a term expiring June 30th, 2026.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Docker number 1038.
The Committee on Planning Development and Transportation, to which was referred on May 20th, 2026.
Message in order for the confirmation of the appointment of Susan Goghinian as a member of the Boston Landmarks Commission for a term expiring June 30th, 2026.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Docket number 1039.
The Committee on Planning Development and Transportation, to which was referred on May 20th, 2026.
Message in order for the confirmation of the appointment of Susan Gulgenian as a member of the Fort Point Channel Landmark District Commission for a term expiring June 30th, 2026.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
And Docker number 1040, the Committee on Planning, Development and Transportation, to which was referred on May 20th, 2026.
Message in order for the confirmation of the reappointment of Kathleen Connor as a member of the Back Bay Architectural District Commission for a term expiring December 31st, 2026.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
The Chair recognizes Councillor Durkin, the Chair of the Committee on Planning, Development and Transportation.
Councillor Durkin, you have the floor.
Thank you, Council President.
Last Friday, June 5th, the Committee on Planning Development and Transportation held a hearing on these eight dockets concerning appointments and reappointments to the Boston Landmarks Commission and several historic district commissions.
We were joined by Joe Cornish, Director of Design Review for the Boston Landmarks Commission, and Elizabeth Sherva from the Office of Historic Preservation.
Both endorsed the nominees and spoke to the expertise and thoughtful selection process behind these appointments.
We then heard from testimony from nominees regarding their experience, professional backgrounds, and interest in serving on these commissions.
For the appointment of the Back Bay Architectural Commission, we heard from Rob Weintraub and David Sampson.
For the appointments of the Boston Landmarks Commission, we heard from David Dixon and Benik Kupta.
We also heard from Kirsten Hoffman for the appointment of the to the Fort Point Channel District Landmark Commission and reappointment to the BLC.
Two nominees were unable to attend this hearing.
In their absence, we received information from the administration regarding Susan Goganian, who is being appointed to the Boston Landmarks Commission and formerly served on the commission, and the reappointment to the Fort Point Commission.
We also heard from Kathleen Kathleen Connor.
We heard from the administration on Kathleen Connor for the reappointment to the BBAC.
It was inspiring to hear from such accomplished professionals whose career spans public service, historic preservation, architecture, and urban planning.
The depth of knowledge and experience they bring to these roles will be invaluable, and it is clear that Boston is fortunate to have these high caliber individuals helping steward our historic resources.
One of my favorite responsibilities as chair of the planning development and transportation committee is bringing forward these nominations to commissions that support historic preservation.
This work is essential to protecting and preserving our history and our culture that define Boston's neighborhoods.
Accordingly, I recommend that these dockets be reported out of committee to the full council for consideration and for formal action.
My recommendation to the council is that these matters ought to pass.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Durkin.
Councillor Durkin, the chair of the committee on planning development and transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket number 0797.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Pardon, I'm jumping ahead.
We'll start with 0796.
All in favor, I'll start over again.
The chair of the committee on planning development and transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket zero seven nine six.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
He doubts the vote.
Uh councillor um Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docker 0796?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Counselor Braden, yes.
Councillor Coletta's a father.
Council Calpepper, Councillor Calpepper, yes, Councilor Durkin.
Counselor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fischer, yes, Council Flynn.
Yes.
Council Flynn, yes, Council Louis.
Council Lugen, yes, Council Mehia.
Council Mehia, yes, Councillor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council Papen.
Yes.
Councillor Penn, yes, Council Santana.
Council Santana, yes, Council Webber.
Yes.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Yes.
Councilor, yes.
Docker number 0796 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docker 0796 has passed and the appointment is confirmed.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 0797?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council Braden, yes, Council Colorado Zapata.
Councillor Culpepper.
Councilor Calpepper, yes, Council Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fitzgerald, yes, Councillor Flynn.
Council Flynn, yes, Council Lugen.
Council, yes, Council Mejia.
Council Mehia, yes, Councillor Murphy.
Counselor Murphy, yes, Council Papen.
Council Papen, yes, Council Santana.
Council Tina, yes, Council Webber.
Yes.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Yes.
Council Warrell, yes.
Docket number 0797 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted on Docket 0797 has passed and the appointment is confirmed.
Councillor, the Chair of the Committee on Planning Development and Transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0798.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 0798?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council of Braden, yes, Councillor Coletta Zapata.
Council Culpepper.
Councilor Calpepper, yes, Councilor Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fitzgerald, yes, Councillor Flynn.
Council Flynn, yes, Council Luigi.
Council, yes, Council Mejia.
Council Mehia, yes, Council Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council Papen.
Yes.
Council of Pen, yes, Council Santana.
Council Santana, yes, Council Weber.
Council Weber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Council Royale, yes.
Docket number 06 0798 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket 0798 has passed and the appointment is confirmed.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 7 0799?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council, yes.
Council Coletta is a part of Council Culpepper.
Council Calpepa, yes.
Council Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Yes.
Council Fischer, yes, Council Flynn.
Yes.
Council Flynn, yes, Council Luigi.
Yes.
Council Luizen, yes, Council Mejia.
Council Mihia, yes, Council Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council Papen.
Yes.
Council of Penn, yes, Council Santana.
Yes.
Council Santana, yes.
Council Webber.
Yes.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Yes.
Council, yes.
Docking number 0799 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket 0799 has passed and the appointment is confirmed.
The chair of the committee on planning development transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket zero eight zero zero.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket Zero eight zero zero?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council Braden, yes.
Council Colas Zapata.
Council Culpepper.
Council Culpepper, yes, Council Durkin.
Counselor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fitzgerald, yes, Council Flynn.
Councillor Flynn, yes, Councillor Luis Gen.
Yes.
Council, yes, Council Mejia.
Council Mehia, yes, Councilor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council Papen.
Council Perpen, yes, Council Santana.
Council Santana, yes, Council Webber.
Yes.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Council, yes.
Docking number 0800 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket 0800 has passed on the appointment is confirmed.
The chair of the committee on planning development and transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket 1037.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Mr.
Dirk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 1037?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Councillor Braden, yes.
Councilor Coletta Zapata.
Counselor Culpepper.
Council Calpepa, yes, Councilor Durkin.
Council Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fitzgerald, yes, Council Flynn.
Council Flynn, yes, Council Louis Gen.
Yes.
Council Lugen, yes, Council Mehia.
Councillor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council Peppen.
Yes.
Council of Penn, yes, Council Santana.
Council Santana, yes, Council Weber.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Yes.
Council Warrell, yes.
Docking number one zero three-seven has received eleven votes in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket one zero three seven has passed and the appointment is confirmed.
The Chair of the Committee on Planning Development and Transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 1038.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 1038?
Councilor Braden.
Yes.
Council Braden, yes, Council Coletta is a part of Council Culpepper.
Council Culpepper, yes, Counselor Durkin.
Council Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Yes.
Council Show, yes, Council Flynn.
Yes.
Council Flynn, yes, Council Luigi.
Yes.
Council, yes, Council Mejia.
Councillor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes.
Council Penn.
Yes.
Councillor Penn, yes, Council Santana.
Yes.
Council Santana, yes.
Council Weber.
Councilor Weber, yes.
And Councilor Warrell.
Yes.
Council, yes.
Docket number one zero three-eight has received eleven votes in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket 1038 has passed on the appointment is confirmed.
The Chair of the Committee on Planning Development and Transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket 1039.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 1039?
Councilor Braden.
Yes.
Council, yes, Council Calaza Pala.
Council Calpepper.
Councilor Calpepper, yes, Councilor Durkin.
Council Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Council of Show, yes, Council Flynn.
Council Flynn, yes, Council Louis Gen.
Yes.
Council Lugen, yes, Council Mejia.
Councilor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council Penn.
Yes.
Council of Penn, yes, Council Santana.
Council Santana, yes, Council Weber.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Yes.
Councilor Orell, yes.
Docker number 1039 has received 11 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket one zero three nine is passed on the appointment is confirmed.
The Chair of the Committee on Planning Development and Transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 1040.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 1040?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council Braden, yes.
Councillor Coletta's a part of Counselor Culpepper.
Counselor Calpepper, yes, Council Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, yes.
Council Fitzgerald.
Yes.
Council Fitzgerald, yes, Council Flynn.
Yes.
Council Flynn, yes, Council Louis Gen.
Yes.
Council, yes, Council Mejia.
Councilor Murphy.
Counselor Murphy, yes.
Council Pen.
Council Penn, yes.
Council Santana.
Yes.
Council Santana, yes.
Councilor Weber.
Yes.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Yes.
Councilor, yes.
Docker number one zero four zero has received eleven votes in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket one zero four zero has passed and the appointment is confirmed.
Mr.
Clerk, would you please read Dockets 0741 through 0754 together?
Give you a moment.
A lot of reading today.
Docker number 0741, the committee in Ways and Means, which was referred on April 8th, 2026.
Mr.
Genona approving an order authorizing a limit for the Boston Public Schools revolving fund for fiscal year 2027 to support the maintenance and repair of Boston public school facilities, including custodial and utility costs for extended building time.
Floor refinishing landscaping and building repairs.
Receipts from lease permit for use and parking fees for Boston Public School facilities will be deposited in the fund.
Boston Public School facilities will be the only unit authorized to expend from the fund, and such expenditures shall not exceed $2 million.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Docker number 0742, the Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred on April 8th, 2026.
Message an order approving an order authorizing a limit for the Boston Public Schools Revolving Fund for fiscal year 2027 for Boston Public Schools transportation costs, including bus and public transportation costs.
The revolving fund shall be credited with revenue received by the Boston Public Schools Department for the provision of transportation to groups and entities for field trips and activities other than transportation to and from school.
Receipts and resulting expenditures from this fund shall not exceed $150,000.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Docking number 0743.
The Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred on April 8, 2026.
Message Genotto approving an order authorizing a limit for the Boston Public Schools Revolving Fund for fiscal year 2027 to repair and purchase Boston Public Schools computer technology, including computers, mobile devices, and instructional software.
This revolving fund shall be credited with any and all receipts from equipment, sales, and repair fees for Boston Public Schools technology.
Receipts and resulting resulting expenditures from this fund shall not exceed $2 million.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
The Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred April 8, 2026.
Message authorized Message and Ota approving an order authorizing a limit for the environmental conservation commission involving fund for fiscal year 2027 for the purpose of securing outside consultants, including engineers, wetland scientists, wildlife biologists, and other experts in order to aid in the review of proposed projects to the commission for the city ordinance protecting local wetland and promoting climate change adaptation.
This revolving fund shall be funded by receipts from fees imposed by the commission for the purpose of securing outside consultants.
The environment department will be the only department authorized to expend from the fund.
Such expenditures shall be kept at $50,000.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
This revolving fund shall be credited with any non-receipts from the sale of renewable and alternative energy certificates and demand response program revenues produced by combined heat and powers unit located by Boston Public School sites and a solar renewable energy certificates produced by the city's photovoltaic arrays.
Receipts and resulting expenditures from this fund shall not exceed $150,000.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
The Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred April 8, 2026.
Massage Northern approving an order authorizing a limit for the equitable equitable emissions investment revolving fund outlined in Section 1G of Berto for fiscal year 2027, pursuant to Mass General Laws, Chapter 44, Section 53E and a half.
To incur liabilities against and spend monies for such fund consistent with the ordinance.
The revolving fund shall be funded by receipts from the alternative compliance payments.
ACPs are an approved emissions mitigation pathway that consists of payments equal to the average per cost per metric ton of CO2E to decarbonize buildings.
The environment department will be the only department authorized to expend from the fund.
And such expenditures shall be capped at one.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Docking number 0747.
The Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred on April 8th, 2026.
Message and order approving an order authorizing a limit for the Boston Center for Youth and Families.
Revolving fund for fiscal year 2027.
To pay salaries and benefits of employees and to purchase supplies and equipment necessary to operate the City Hall daycare.
Child care.
This revolving fund shall be credited with any and all receipts from tuition paid by parents or guardians of children enrolled at the center.
Receipts and resulting expenditures from this fund shall not exceed $1,100,000.
Submits a report recommending the order ought to pass.
Message in order approving an order authorizing a limit for the law department revolving fund for fiscal year 2027 to purchase goods and services to pay for repairs to city property.
This revolving fund shall be funded by receipts from recoveries for damages to city property caused by third parties.
The law department will be the only department authorized to expend from the fund, and such expenditures shall be capped at $300,000.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
The Committee on Ways and Means was which was referred April 8th, 2026.
Message and August approving an order authorizing a limit for the Boston Police Department Revolving Fund for Fiscal Year 2027 to pay salaries and benefits of employees and to purchase supplies and equipment necessary to operate the Boston Police Department Fitness Center.
Revenue for this fund is derived from monthly membership fees.
Receipts and resulting expenditures from this fund shall not exceed 100,000.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Docket number 0750.
The Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred April 8, 2026.
Message United approving an order authorizing a limit for the Boston Police Department Revolving Fund for fiscal year 2027 to support the K-9 unit's training programs for officers and police dogs from non-City of Boston Law Enforcement Agencies.
The Special Operations Division will charge tuition and other fees to outside law enforcement agencies for training with the K9 unit.
The tuition and other fees paid by outside agency will be used to purchase training equipment, certify instructors, update facilities, and provide funds for other training needs not otherwise budgeted.
The special operations division will be the only unit authorized to expend from the fund, and such expenditures shall be capped at $100,000.
Submits a report that the order ought to pass.
Document number 0751.
The Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred April 8, 2026.
Message and order approving an order authorizing a limit for the Mayor's Office of Arts and Culture, revolving fund for fiscal year 2027, to purchase goods and services to support public art to enhance the public realm throughout the city of Boston.
This revolving fund shall be funded by receipts from easements within the public way granted by the public improvement commission.
The mayor's office of arts and culture will be the only unit authorized to expend from the fund, and such expenditures shall be capped at $800,000.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
The Committee on Ways and Means, to which was referred on April 8th, 2026, Message Inord approving an order authorizing a limit for the Mayor's Office of Arts and Culture Revolving Fund for fiscal year 2027 to purchase goods and services to fund the operation of Strand Theater.
The revolving fund shall be funded by receipts from rental fees for the use of the Strand Theater.
The Mayor's Office of Arts and Culture will be the only unit authorized to expend from the fund, and such expendes shall be kept at $300,000.
Submits a report that the order ought to pass.
The Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred on April 8, 2026.
Message in order approving an order to authorizing a limit for the Mayor's Office of Tourism.
Revolving fund for fiscal year 2027 to purchase goods and services to support events and programming on and around City Hall Plaza to advance tourism and promote participation in public celebrations and civic and culture events.
This revolving fund shall be funded by receipts from payments for the use of City Hall Plaza to pursuant to uh city of Boston Code Chapter 11, Section 7-14.
The Mayor's Office of Tourism would be the only unit authorized to expend from the fund and such expenditures shall be kept at $150,000.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass and docket number 0754, the committee on ways and means ways and means to which was referred April 8, 2026.
Message and not approving an order authorizing a limit for the Transportation Department Revolving Fund for fiscal year 2027 to support the operation of the bike share program within the city of Boston.
This revolving fund shall be funded by system-generated user revenues, sponsorship revenues, and advertising revenues.
And such expenditures shall be kept at $1,400,000.
Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
This is a marathon session for you today.
Thank you very much.
Uh I'm going to take dockets 0741 to 0745 first.
These authorize annual spending limits for city revolving funds that allow departments to use revenue, they generate themselves.
These revolving funds include BPS revolving funds for facilities, custodial utility and transportation costs, computer repair and purchase costs for the sale of renewable and alternative energy certificates and funding for the environment conservation commission to secure outside consultants in order to aid in the review of proposed projects to the commission per the city's ordinance protecting local wetland and promoting climate change adaptation.
For these reasons, uh the committee recommends passage of these five dockets, and I respectfully ask for my colleagues' support on docket numbers 0741 to 0745, and then I'll address the rest.
0741 through 0745.
To vote, can we vote on them all together?
Councillor, we've read the chair, we've read them all into the record, so we'd probably like to go ahead and vote on them all.
Pardon me, hold on a second, Council.
He's still in discussion.
He's still in discussion of the dockets that were read into the record.
Councillor, Councillor Weber, you have the floor.
So that was docket number 0741 to 0745.
0746 creates a new revolving fund to support Boston's building emissions program, otherwise known as Birdo.
The fund would be paid for through collection of fees from building owners who choose to make compliance payments instead of reducing emissions.
The environment department would manage the fund with a cap of 1.5 million per year.
Docket numbers 0747 to 0753 authorize annual spending limits for city revolving funds, which allow the dock departments.
Which allow departments to use revenue they generate themselves.
These revolving funds support the equitable emission investment fund under Birdo, City Hall Childcare operations, the police canine training program, public art initiatives, operations at Strand Theater and Tourism and Cultural and Civic Programs at City Hall Plaza.
For these reasons, the committee recommends passage of these seven dockets 0747 to 0753 in respect to the ask for my colleagues' support.
Docket number 0754 creates a new revolving fund to support Boston's bike share program.
The fund would be paid by user fees, sponsorship, and advertising revenue generated by the program.
The transportation department who would manage the fund spending capped at 1.4 million dollars per year.
So I believe that's what we've read into the record.
And offering uh, you know, I'm recommending passage of those dockets.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor.
Um Councillor Weber.
Councillor Mejia, did you have a clarified?
Very good.
Thank you.
Councillor Durkin.
Oh, sorry, which are on.
Withdrawn?
Okay.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
That was a lot to read through.
We will now proceed to a vote on these dockets.
We'll start with Docket 0741.
The Chair of the Committee of Wes and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0741.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please read Docket 074?
Could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 0741?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council of Coletta Zapata.
Council Culpepper.
Council Calpepper, yes.
Councillor Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Counselor, yes, Councillor Flynn.
Councillor Flynn, yes, Council Wu Jen.
Yes.
Council, yes, Council Mejia.
Council Mejia, yes, Councilor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council of Pen.
Yes.
Councillor Penn, yes, Councillor Santana.
Council Santana, yes, Council Weber.
Yes.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Councillor Coletta Zapata.
Counselor Colet Zapata, yes.
Docking number 0741 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you.
Um the chair of the committee on ways and me.
Oh, sorry, that's uh thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket 0741 has passed.
And also, Mr.
Clerk, could you please record that Dr.
Councillor giving your promotion?
Dr.
Coletta Zapata?
Uh Councillor Coletta Zapata has joined us.
Thank you.
The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0742.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Mr.
Kirk, could you please read Docket 0742?
Council of Braden.
Yes.
Council Braden, yes, Councillor Calera Zapata.
Council Color Zapata, yes, Council Culpepper.
Councillor Flynn, yes, Council.
Yes.
Council, yes, Council Mejia.
Council Mejia, yes, Councillor Murphy.
Counselor Murphy, yes, Council for Pen.
Counselor Penn, yes, Council Santana.
Council Santana, yes, Councillor Weber.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Yes.
Council Warrell, yes.
Docking have a 0742 as we see the unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been adopted and docket 0742 accepted and docket 040742 has passed.
The chair of the committee on ways and means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket 0743.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket 0742 has passed.
Whoops.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please uh take a roll call vote on Docket 0743?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council Braden, yes, Councillor Coletta Zapata.
Council Cousin, yes.
Councillor Culpepper.
Council Culpepper, yes, Councillor Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, yes, Counselor Fischer.
Yes.
Council Fischer, yes, Council Flynn.
Council of Flynn, yes, Councillor.
Yes.
Council, yes.
Council Mejia.
Council Mejia, yes, Council Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council of Pen.
Council Penn, yes, Council Santana.
Councilor Santana, yes, Councillor Weber.
Yes.
Council Webber, yes, and Councillor Warrell.
Council Royale, yes.
Docket number 0743 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket 0743 has passed.
The chair of the committee on ways and means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket zero seven four four.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on zero seven four four?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council Brady, yes.
Councillor Calar Zapata.
Councillor Culpepper.
Councillor Culpepper, yes, Councillor Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fitzgerald, yes, Council Flynn.
Yes.
Counselor Flynn, yes, Council Lugen.
Yes.
Council Lugen, yes, Council Mejia.
Council Mehia, yes, Councillor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council Be Pen.
Council of Pen, yes, Council Santana.
Council Santana, yes, Council Weber.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Council worrell, yes.
Docking number zero seven four four has received twelve votes in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket zero seven four four has passed.
The chair of the committee on ways and means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket zero seven four five.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket Zero Seven Four Five?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council Braden, yes, Council Coletta's a part.
Council Calpepper.
Councilor Calpepper, yes, Councilor Durkin.
Council Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fitzgerald, yes, Council Flynn.
Council Flynn, yes, Council Luigi.
Yes.
Council Luigi, yes, Council Mehia.
Council of Mejia, yes, Council Murphy.
Council Murphy, yes, Council of Pen.
Council of Penn, yes, Council Santana.
Council Santana, yes, Council Weber.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Yes.
Council Royal, yes.
Docking number 0745 has received 12 votes in the affairment.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket zero seven four five is passed.
The chair of the committee on ways and means acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket zero seven four six.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 0746?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council Braden, yes, Council Coletta Zapata.
Council Coletta Zapata, yes, Council Culpepper.
Council Culpepper, yes, Council Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fischer, yes, Councillor Flynn.
Council Flynn, yes, Council Lugen.
Council Lugen, yes, Council Mehia.
Council Mehia, yes, Council Murphy.
Counselor Murphy, yes, Council Papen, Council McPen, yes, Council Santana.
Council of Santana, yes, Council Weber.
Yes.
Council Weber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Counselor, yes.
Docket number 0746 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket 0746 has passed.
The chair of the committee on ways and means acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket zero seven four seven.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket Zero Seven Four Seven?
Councilor Braden.
Yes.
Council Braden, yes, Council Colada Zapata.
Council Zapata, yes.
Council Culpepper, Council Culpepper, yes.
Councillor Durkin, Councilor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald, Council of Sherry, yes, Councillor Flynn.
Council Flynn, yes, Council Luigi.
Yes.
Council, yes, Council Mehia.
Council Mehia, yes, Council Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council Papen.
Council Pen, yes.
Council Santana.
Council Santana, yes, Councillor Weber.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Council Orell, yes.
Docker number 0747 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket zero seven four seven is passed.
The chair of the committee on ways and means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket zero seven four eight.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Thank you.
The committee report.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 0748?
Council of Braden, yes.
Council Braden, yes, Council Collada's a part.
Council, yes, Council Culpepper, Council Culpepper, yes.
Councillor Durkin, Councilor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fitzgerald, yes, Councillor Flynn.
Council of Jen.
Yes.
Council, yes, Council Mehia.
Council Mehia, yes, Councilor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council of Pen.
Council Pen, yes, Council Santiana.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Council, yes.
Docking number Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket zero seven four eight has passed.
The chair of the committee on ways and means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket zero seven four nine.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 0749?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council Braden, yes.
Councillor Calazapati.
Council Calazapati, yes, Councillor Calpepper.
Council Calpepper, yes, Council Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fischer, yes, Council Flynn.
Councillor Luigian.
Council, yes, Council Mehia.
Council Mehia, yes, Councilor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council of Penn.
Council of Penn, yes, Council St.
Anna.
Yes.
Councillor Santiana, yes, Council Weber.
Yes.
Council Weber, yes, Council Warrell.
Council Warrell, yes.
Councillor Flynn.
Yes.
Councillor Flynn, yes.
Docker number 0749 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket 0749 has passed.
The chair of the committee on ways and means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket zero seven five zero.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed, say nay.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket Zero Seven Five Zero?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council of Braden, yes, Council Coletta Zapata.
Council Coletta's apartheid, yes.
Councillor Culpepper.
Council Calpepper, yes, Councillor Durkin.
Council Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald.
Councilor Flynn, yes, Council Louis Gen.
Council, yes, Council Mejia, Council Mehia, yes, Councilor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Council of Penn.
Council of Pen, yes, Council Santana.
Council Santana, yes, Council Webber, Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Yes.
Council Warrell, yes.
Docket number 0750 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket zero seven five zero has passed.
The chair of the committee on ways and means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket zero seven five one.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket Zero Seven Five One?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Counselor Braden, yes.
Council Coletta Zapata.
Council Collector, yes.
Council Calpepper.
Councilor Calpepper, yes, Councillor Durkin.
Councillor Durkin, yes, Council Fitzgerald, Council of Shell, yes, Council Flynn.
Council Flynn, yes, Council Lugen.
Councillor Mehia.
Council Mehia, yes, Councilor Murphy.
Council Murphy, yes, Council of Penn.
Councilor Penn, yes, Council Santana.
Council Santana, yes, Council Weber.
Council Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Council Orrell, yes.
Docker number 0751 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket 0751 has passed.
The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0752.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 0752?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Council Braden, yes.
Council Colazapar.
Councillor Calazapati, yes.
Council Calpe.
Councilor Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, yes.
Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fitzgerald, yes, Councillor Flynn.
Yes.
Council Flynn, yes, Council.
Council Mehia.
Council Mehia, yes, Councilor Murphy.
Council Murphy, yes, Council of Pen.
Council of Penn, yes, Council Santiana.
Council Santana, yes, Councillor Weber.
Council Webber, yes, and Council War.
Council, yes.
Docker number 0752 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket 0752 has passed.
The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docker Zero Seven Five Three.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket Zero Seven Five Three?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Councillor Braden, yes.
Councillor Colorado's opponent.
Councillor Color is a party, yes.
Councillor Carl Pepper.
Councillor Calpepper, yes, Councilor Durkin.
Councillor Durkin, yes, Councillor Fitzgerald.
Councillor, yes, Councillor Flynn.
Councillor Flynn, yes, Councillor Louise.
Councillor Mejia.
Councilor Mehia, yes, Councillor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes, Councillor Penn.
Councillor Pepin, yes, Councillor Santana.
Councillor Santana, yes, Councillor Weber.
Councillor Webber, yes, and Council Warrell.
Councilor, yes.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call?
I've done it.
I need to check it off.
Thank you.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Thank you.
The committee report has been accepted and docket Zero Seven Five Four has passed.
We are now going to take a brief recess until 215.
Brief recess.
I don't know how much I'm going to go.
No, no, no, no.
No, no, no.
No, no, no.
No, no, no.
No, no, no.
And you can do it.
I wouldn't have to go back to the back.
Oh, yeah.
No, I don't know.
I'm going to go ahead and see.
Oh, yeah.
What's the point of order?
What what what role are you uh bringing up?
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Madam Chair, during this brief during this recess, I do understand and want to bring it to the attention that negotiations were taking place behind the scenes outside of this INLA chamber, which I believe potentially could be an open meeting law violation.
We can't negotiate outside of this area while the body's in session.
That's the rule.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn.
Counselor Flynn, we're moving on.
Pursuant to Rule 39, each counselor will have 10 minutes to discuss the main motion, which is the full docket as presented.
The assistant clerk will keep track with a stopwatch.
If counselors do not use all their time in the first round, they will be able to use any remaining time they have in a second round.
Pursuant to Rule 30, councillors will have a separate two minutes for each subsidiary motion meaning, and including amendments of the co for counselor will be limited to two minutes.
We will be reasonably enforcing time limits in accordance with the council rules, and to ensure each counselor is allotted an equal and fair amount of time.
Mr.
Clerk, would you please read document zero seven three three?
I'll give you the mic, thank you.
Submits a report recommending the order but to pass in an amended draft.
I'd like to move to substitute the committee report with a new committee report.
This reflects a few changes.
One uh in the package has been removed two hundred thousand dollars that was being pulled from Boston Public Libraries, and uh, you know, after after feedback from uh my colleagues and advocates and an increase in uh from a poll from the execution courts by one hundred thousand dollars.
Uh in addition, so the full package would be eight point one million dollars, and that uh uh it and it would fund uh two million dollars for city housing vouchers, which is still instead of two point one million, which is still over the uh a hundred percent of what it was last year.
In addition, the original committee report sought to ensure that funds for the Office of Blackmail Advancement, the Office of LGPTQ IA 2S Plus advancement, and the Office of Women's Advancement went directly to those offices instead of sending them to the equity Office.
When the funds uh while the funds for the Office of blackmail advancement were sent directly to that office in the original tax order, there was some confusion about where the funds for the Office of Women's Advancement and the Office of LGBTQ IA2S Plus would end up.
The substituted committee report alters the tax order to prevent any possible confusion by expressly routing directly to the mayor's office of women's advancement 100,000 and to the office of LGBTQ IA2S Plus Advancement $200,000.
That's in addition to the $555,000 being directly sent to the Office of Black Mail Advancement.
In the prior report, the funds were designated for these offices, but were routed through the equity office.
This change reflects what was screen chair and discussed during the last working session, and now the tax order is updated to ensure the funding goes directly to those two offices.
So I just I move to substitute the committee report for those reasons, and then we can discuss the merits of it.
Thank you.
Absolutely objection.
Councillor Weber's substitution is before the body.
Sorry.
I just walked in.
Just so that I'm clear, are we on docket uh 7033?
Yes.
And the motion on the table is just a substitution, right?
Correct.
Not his um uh request uh no, we we will discuss the the full package uh after.
This is just to substitute the committee report uh make and and honestly, most of it is just to make sure that funds that we've designated for the Office of Women's Advancement and the Office of LGBTQ uh plus uh advancement will be sent directly to those offices instead of to the equity office, which was in our presentation but not in the tax order.
Thank you.
No, and I appreciate that.
I think that it's really important for those who are following us on this.
Are you objection?
Are you objecting to no?
I just wanted to make sure that we all knew what was happening.
Thank you.
Okay, thank you.
Thank you very much.
Counselor um, um counselor uh, light on first.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Um thank you, madam president.
Um, I'm gonna move uh motion to amend the ways and means amendment package to restore 1.2 million dollars for the office of uh immigrant advancement grants.
We're not we're not we're not we're not there yet.
I haven't brought the package to the floor but it was substituted.
I believe I can make a motion to introduce that.
Thank you.
Um, but have we substituted?
Okay, I think there was a second.
Yeah.
Hold on a second.
Okay, counselor.
Counselor, are you have you uh counselor mehia?
Are you objecting?
No, I'm giving up to object.
Okay.
You have the floor.
No, because I feel like right now there's a little bit of confusion creating here, and I just want to make sure.
So I um, if it would be helpful for me to understand, you know, because counselor colletta's already ready to go to amendments.
I I believe he's still talking about substitution, so I just need to I need somebody to help me understand, yeah.
What is at play, yeah, and at what point I can speak in regards to objecting.
The um just this whole process.
Thank you, Councillor Mejia.
Um, because Council Mahia is objecting to the committee report, would be polling the committee.
Uh yes, vote means you agree with the chair's recommendation on reporting this out, and no means that this matter should return to committee.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a poll?
Wait one second.
So uh Council Brady, if you could like advance to me, I microphone.
Thank you, Councillor Braden, for recognizing me now officially, Madam President.
I object to the chair's committee report on Docket 0733.
To be clear, I am not objecting to the chair's offering a substitution.
I am objecting to the chair's reporting out on this docket so that we can move this item to the green sheets and then pull it from the green sheets to take a full vote on rejecting the budget.
Community members have been actively calling for this action, and it would be disrespectful to not allow councillors to vote on it and have those votes reflected in for the public record.
I ask respectfully that my colleagues who are members of the ways and means committee to vote no on agreeing on the chairs reporting out when they are polled so that we can let democracy play out.
The chair recognizes Councillor Weber.
Councillor Weber, you have the floor.
Yeah, we're just trying to uh substitute the committee report so we can then bring it to the floor and have a discussion about the amendments that we're doing.
People will have a full opportunity to vote for or against the amendment package, make amendments, and we'll uh have that discussion again.
So let's have the vote.
The vote is just to make make two minor changes to the committee report, primarily to make sure that funds in the amendment package for the Office of Women's Advancement and the Office of LGBTQ plus advancement will go directly to those offices instead of through the equity cabinet.
In addition, we did remove a cut from the Boston public libraries uh and uh you know, I took 100,000 dollars from execution courts in addition to what we'd originally proposed, and but it again you don't have to be voting for this or allowing this to go forward allows for a full hearing about the amendment package, and you can you can still vote down the amendment package, you can make amendments to the amendment package, it just brings it to the floor.
We're going to poll the committee, thank you.
Would I try and thank you?
Hang on, I need to just take its breath here.
We're going uh we would like to poll the committee, Mr.
Clerk.
I would receive my order.
I have a point.
So it's still in there.
Where is it?
This will all be open for discussion.
We just need to bring the amended report properly before the body right now.
I have a added amount.
I just want to be there.
Okay, I have second, I'm sorry, one at a time, please.
Yes.
This mic is in the remarks.
I think before you were in here.
The the committee report is originally filed, directed $555,000 directly to the Office of Black Mail Advancement.
It's just that the $300,000 for the Office of Women's Advancement and the LGBTQ plus advancement office were routed to them through the equity office.
All this does is provide them with the same assurance, those two offices that we've already provided for the Office of Black Mail Advancement.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor College Pepper for your question.
Councillor Tapano, I have a procedural point of um point of information, I guess, from the clerk.
So uh I'm my question is was the report properly substituted on the floor, and then because I made a motion first and it was seconded, isn't that motion in the uh sequential order should be taken first before any other motions?
It's still it's still allowed.
It's still still an outstanding motion.
It's still an outstanding motion that's that's on the floor.
Yes.
So moving forward, will that be taken first?
That motion.
That's my intention, yes.
Okay, thank you.
If councillors want to speak, I will allow my colleagues to speak, but I want to clarify that we are only addressing the question of polling the committee for the chair's report right now.
Comments and debate on the budget itself will be fully allowed later in the meeting at the appropriate time.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please poll the uh ways and means committee?
Members of the committee on ways and means, councillor Weber.
Yes, Councillor Fitzgerald.
Councillor Colletta's a part.
I'm sorry, we're guessing.
Yes, to bring it on the fold.
I'm gonna ask you.
No, I'm not interested.
No, please.
I'm calling for I want to get out of my colletta, Councillor Coletta's apparel.
I'm calling for MSS.
The President is on the Council Julia Mahe, you need to sit down.
No, I'm sorry.
No, you need to sit down.
We're trying to.
I know, but this there's some there's some weird stuff happening right now.
We're trying to actually follow an order here.
So please sit down.
We're polling the committee.
A yes vote means that you agree with the chair's recommendation on reporting this out.
A no vote means that this matter should remain in committee.
Hold on, I'm taking I'm taking a brief recess here because all of this is clear.
We are polling the Ways and Means Committee.
A yes vote means that we agree with the chair's recommendation.
And a no vote means that this matter should return to committee.
Mr.
Kirk, could you please re uh poll the ways and means committee?
Councillor Weber.
Yes.
Councillor Fitzgerald.
Yes.
Councillor Kaletta Zapata.
Yes.
Councillor Culpepper.
Council Louisiane.
Yes.
Councillor Penn.
Councillor Warrell.
Yes.
All right.
Thank you.
The chair's substituted committee report is before the body.
I would like to return to Councillor Weber, Councillor Weber, Chair of Ways and Means for your continued remarks.
Councillor Weber.
Thank you very much, Madam President.
This year's budget process was exceptionally challenging.
City costs, particularly for health care, are rising much faster than revenues, with property taxes rising at the slowest rate since 1998.
As a result, the overall budget from FY26 to FY27 grew by just 2.1%, marking the slowest growth since the great recession in fiscal year 2010.
As a result of those pressures, the mayor's proposed budget cut many of the grants and programs that support our most vulnerable communities in a city that must do everything it can to address gaps in wealth, health, and academic achievement that fall along racial and socio-economic lines.
We need budgets that provide real tangible support for housing, seniors, youth, small businesses, food access, and the arts.
City councillors have heard calls to restore the cuts over the last two months in over 150 hours of budget hearings, city hall listening sessions, neighborhood town halls, and working sessions.
Accordingly, my office received submissions from my colleagues and about what we should fund with the amendments to the proposed fiscal year 2027 budget, and that aligned with the advocacy of our constituents.
As a result of as the chair of the Ways and Means Committee of the Boston City Council, uh I submitted an amendment package last Wednesday and again today that restores nearly all the cuts that advocates have been fighting, approximately $3 million, that's proposed fiscal year 2027 budget.
The amendment package before us today totals 8.1 million dollars and will fund the following for the office of housing vouchers, $450,000 for access to council, $300,000 for down payment assistance, $125,000 for BH 18 mentoring, and $60,000 for rent stabilization, all at 100% or above of what they were last year.
For the age-strong commission, the amendment package restores 1.2 million dollars for senior programming and grants.
For the Office of Black Male Advancement, $555,000.
For the Office of LGBTQ, IA2S Plus Advancement, it's $200,000.
And for the Office of Women's Advancement, another $100,000.
For youth jobs, it adds $750,000.
When added to the private funding secured by Mayor Wu for 2,000 school year youth jobs, this will supply approximately $2,225 youth jobs, more than the $1,800 jobs last year.
For the returning citizens, for returning citizens and families, this package will provide $750,000 for arts and culture, $600,000.
For small businesses, $600,000, and for food access and support, $400,000.
This package moves more money than the council has in recent years on a more challenging budget and with a forecast for more trouble ahead.
We are under more pressure than ever to make smart decisions that are going to set up Boston for future success.
Our goal was to supply a budget amendment package that would fund vital programming like housing vouchers and youth jobs without negatively impacting the services our residents rely on or create the risk of layoffs of city workers.
Our process has helped us construct an amendment package that restores 100% of the cuts impacting housing vouchers, access to council, down payment assistance, rental stabilization, BH 18 mentoring, the Office of LGBTQ, IA2S Plus Advancement, and the Mayor's Office of Women's Advancement.
In addition, we have secured 89% of the grants for age strong, 67% of the funding for small businesses, 58% of the funding for returning citizens and their families, and 50% of the funding for arts and culture and grants to combat food security.
And by adding $750,000 onto the youth jobs pool, we'll be ensuring there will be city-based jobs for our youth.
And with the private funding secured by the mayor, there will be more than four or five hundred more school year jobs than were provided last year.
The council must take action today, Wednesday, June 10th, where the mayor's budget will automatically move forward unamended, which will I urge my colleagues to support this package and deliver the funds and grants our communities deserve.
I'd be remiss not to thank my staff and city council central office, our central office budget staff for all the hard work they've put in over this process, which has allowed us to arrive at a vote today on a package.
I'd also like to thank my colleagues who participated in this budget review process.
As the chair of the Ways and Means Committee, I am seeking acceptance of this committee report in an amended draft and passage of this docket before you today.
Thank you.
No, myself.
Thank you, Chair Weber.
Chair recognizes Consulate Canata Zapata, you have the floor.
Thank you, um, Council President.
So, Madam Chair, I move to amend the amendment package to restore the $1.2 million for the Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Grants.
This amendment would restore funding for immigrant legal services, ESOL programming, and community-based immigration support grants consistent with the funding levels previously discussed during the council's working sessions and introduced by the chair.
I ask that that amendment be distributed and considered.
Do you have a second?
Madam President, point of information or whatever we're calling.
I just just for the record, I'll be recusing myself from this discussion based on guidance I've received from the state ethics commission.
Okay, thank you.
Thank you.
Counselor Caleda, your motion is seconded.
You have the floor.
Thank you so much.
I rise today in support of this amendment restoring funding to the mayor's office of immigrant advancement.
This amendment restores funding that many of us discussed extensively throughout the budget process, and that was originally contemplated as part of the broader restoration conversations that occurred during the working session that we all agreed that we wanted to introduce.
Specifically, this amendment restores funding for immigrant legal services, ESOL programming, which is a huge need in my district.
Language access and community-based grants administered through the mayor's office of immigrant advancement.
So specifically, what this amendment to the amendment package introduces is ESOL grant support and to the tune of $275,000.
Legal access, which is a huge necessity during this federal administration and their horrific attacks on our immigrant brothers and sisters and folks with even with legal protected status.
And tuition equity for 172,000, and then as well as weaving well-being at 269,517 dollars.
Across Boston, immigrant families continue to navigate increasingly complex legal challenges, language barriers, and uncertainty about access to services.
The legal aid funded supported through Moya helps families access qualified, legal representation, and trusted community-based assistance.
The ESOL funding helps residents learn English, access employment opportunities, support their children's education, and fully participate in civic life.
In district one, these investments are especially important.
East Boston is one of the most diverse neighborhoods in the city of Boston and home to generation of immigrant families from around the world.
Every week, our office works with residents who rely on legal aid services, language access support, and ESOL programs to navigate everyday challenges.
We have seen firsthand how these investments improve economic mobility, educational outcomes, and community stability.
This amendment also reflects the work already done by this council.
This funding, uh the funding levels contained in this amendment mirror the restoration concepts previously discussed during our working session and are consistent with the priorities many colleagues expressed throughout this process.
To me, this is not a partisan amendment.
It is an amendment that recognizes that immigrant families are part of Boston's story, part of Boston's economy, and part of Boston's future.
For those reasons, I ask my colleagues to support this amendment and restore funding to the mayor's office of immigrant advancement.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please read Council Calada Zapata's?
I apologize for getting the cart before the horse here.
Could you please read um Councillor Kaleda Zapata's amendment into the record?
Amendment of Councillor Coletta Zapata, document number 0733, message in order for appropriate annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended, shall be amended as follows.
Decrease execution of court special appropriation.
Increase office for immigrant advancement contractual services, $960,000 for the mayor's office of immigrant advancement funding.
Decrease Department of Innovation Technology Contractual Services.
Increase Office for Immigrant Advancement Contractual Services, 40,000 for Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Funding.
Decrease Office of People Operations Contractual Services Increase Office for Immigrant Advancement Contract Contractual Services $50,000 for Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Funding.
Decrease Labor Relations Contractual Services Increase Office of Immigrant Advancement Contractual Services.
50,000 for Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Funding.
Decrease Office of Financial Contractual Services.
Increase Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Contractual Services.
100,000 for Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Fund.
Filed in the Council June 10th.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Does anyone wish to speak on this amendment?
Councillor Durkin, you have the floor.
Thank you so much.
I want to begin by recognizing the work of our ways and means chair, Chair Weber, the administration, all of my colleagues on this council, of course, central staff, especially specifically Kershma and Ryan.
Over the past several months, this process has been, we've been involved in many hours of hearings, working sessions, public testimony, and conversations with residents across the city.
There have been significant disagreements about the best path forward, many of which remain.
But I believe this amendment package before us with the included amendment reflects a thoughtful effort to address concerns while meeting the financial realities facing our city.
For that, I rise today in support of both uh the chair's amendment package and this addition.
The budget, as proposed by the mayor, was not written easy under easy circumstances.
It reflects the real financial constraint of the movement, driven by rising cross from employee health care and public overtime safety overtime to unanticipated snow removal costs and the continued inflationary pressures affecting both municipal budgets across the country and specifically Boston.
In times like these, the council is taught uh tasked with being doing what responsible government must do, make decisions.
Across the commonwealth, I read in the globe this week, cities, Summerville, Malden, and New Bedford are confronting layoffs and service reductions amid significant financial challenges.
Many are warning that without additional revenue measures, including against prop uh Prop two and half overrides, they will be forced to make additional cuts.
Against that backdrop, I'm proud that this package preserves the core services that residents rely on every day while protecting filled city positions.
It reflects a serious effort to live within our means while responding to priorities raised throughout the process.
Across this body, there has been consensus that some of the additional letters.
L'immersion, on a vu, and also, and all of a lot of them, and I'm not a little bit of a big.
Oh, and I think it's a little bit of a little bit of a lot.
Well, we're not eating it.
I don't know about that.
I mean, no, no, no, no.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
No, no, no.
No, no, no, no.
No, no, no, no, no.
No, no, no, no, no.
I don't know if you're not on the other one.
I don't know.
I think that's a good one.
Oh, that's a good one.
I think it's kind of a lot of people.
But I don't know what we think about.
It's not a lot of people.
I don't know if you can.
Oh, yeah.
I don't know what that is.
I don't think it's a little bit.
I think that's what I have to do.
It is not all.
If you don't want to go, you try to do this.
I think we have to look at the other one.
I don't know what it's not about.
You have a lot of multiple.
I think I'm going to be there.
But what is the time?
That's the scary one.
I think it's not a good one.
I'm going to go down.
I'm going to go to the back of the phone.
So we're going to put it on.
You can have a change in the world.
There's about two.
I think you take it out.
I don't want to go.
I don't know if that's what I think about.
I think we're all going to be able to do that.
I don't know what I'm going to do.
I don't know what I'm looking for.
So we're going to go for a lot of that.
So we're going to do it at all.
I think it would be like a call.
I don't want to be a little bit more than that.
I don't know how to find out.
I thought we'd done that.
You know, but you can do it's not a big thing.
You're really good.
So if I look at that, we're going to go on.
I don't know if I'm not going to go on.
That's what we're doing.
Oh my god, that's what I was doing.
I mean, we can do it.
Oh, I don't know if that's it.
I don't know what that's like, but I can't.
I don't think that's not a cat.
Oh, yeah.
I don't know what it was.
I wonder what I thought.
You can't even let it go.
I want to come out and make a rather great.
No, but why would we say?
Mm-hmm.
I think it's a good one.
If we can do a hard deadline.
So thank you.
We are back in session.
As a pursuant to rule 2042, no demonstration of approval or disapproval from members of the public will be permitted, including but not limited to signs, placards, banners, cheering, clapping, or booing, etc.
And if such demonstrations are made, the gallery or public seating area will be cleared.
This rule will be strictly enforced.
There will be no more warnings.
If we may if you make a disturbance or distraction, you will be escorted out.
As a reminder, we are currently on docket number zero seven three three.
Given the disruption, I don't remember who was next up to speak.
So in fairness to my colleagues, please refresh my memory and who is next, and we will go from there.
Um a motion from one of my colleagues.
And so in the spirit again of consensus collaboration collegiality, I'm going to withdraw my motion, and I do look forward to ultimately voting on this budget package presented by the chair, and then look forward to uh hearing from my colleagues if they have other ideas of things that they want to fund and talking through those amendments in a very cordial and respectful way.
Yes, thank you, Madam President.
Uh I'd like to thank Council Coletta Zapata for withdrawing that, knowing that uh in an amendment package that we had originally that we were going to originally propose, uh, we will now bifurcate that.
Uh and I would like to introduce uh an original uh amendment on the floor um to be voted on.
And then my intent is to after this uh this amendment package that we will then have a vote uh on the Moyer amendment package as well.
So I have a non-MOIA package and a Moya package for uh evident reasons.
Do you you are you have a motion to offer another amendment?
Do you have a seconder?
Thank you.
Um we have a seconder, uh, Mr.
Clerk.
I think you should read.
Could you read this uh amendment into the record for us?
I better give you some arms here.
Amendment of Council Fitzgerald, document number 0733, message in order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended shall be amended as follows.
Coordinated response team, decrease Boston Transportation Department Personnel Services, increase Office of Human Services Personnel Services, 75,000 to be directed toward three permanent full-time employees for the citywide coordinated response team.
Decrease Boston Public Health Commission special appropriation, increase office of human services personnel services 125,000 to be directed towards three permanent full-time employees for the citywide coordinated response team.
Age strong grants and programming, decrease Boston Transportation Department Personnel Services, increase age strong commission contractual services 150,000 to be directed toward community grants, office of food justice grants, decrease Boston Transportation Department Personnel Services, increase Office of Food Justice Contractual Services, $50,000 to be directed toward community grants.
EMS Health and Wellness Grants decrease Boston Transportation Department Personnel Services, increase Boston Public Health Commission special appropriations, $125,000 to be directed towards emergency medical services, health and wellness.
Legacy business awards.
Decrease Boston Transportation Department Personnel Services.
Increase Office of Economic Opportunity and Inclusion Contractual Services, $300,000 to be directed toward Legacy Business Awards.
MWBE Procurement Readiness Pilot.
Decrease Boston Transportation Department Personnel Services.
Increase Public Facilities Department Contractual Services, $200,000 to be directed toward MWBE Procurement Readiness Pilot.
At risk and transitional youth jobs and assistance.
Decrease Boston Transportation Department.
Personnel services increase youth employment and opportunity contractual services, $50,000 to be directed toward at-risk and transitional youth jobs and assistance.
Arts and culture grants.
Decrease Boston Transportation Department Personnel Services.
Increase Office of Arts and Culture Contractual Services, $225,000 to be directed toward arts and culture grants.
Decrease Boston Transportation Department personnel services.
Increase human rights commission personnel services, $200,000 to be directed toward human rights commission personnel services.
Veteran Services decrease Boston Transportation Department.
Fair housing testing program decrease Boston Public Library Personnel Services.
Increase Office of Fair Housing and Equity Contractual Services.
$100,000 to be directed toward fair housing testing program filed in the council June 10th.
Chair recognizes Council Fitzgerald.
Do you maybe continue?
Thank you, Madam President.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk, for reading all that.
First, I'd like to focus on where these polls are coming from so people understand they're coming from BTD.
We have 1.4 million coming from BTD personnel services.
The reason we chose to focus in on the BTD personnel services is that we looked at their five-year underspend, and the average was three and a half million.
By taking 1.4 million, we believe that the department can make the necessary changes within the department to decide what they want to do with this cut, just as when we cut from any other department.
They have to recalibrate internally, and we believe that they have the bandwidth to do that.
There are a couple of the ones at BPHC and Library.
Those are offset by other things that will be in the substituted budget from the chair.
And as you can see, originally we had some more money in this, but as things you have to work out, you know, not everyone, there's just sometimes not enough to go around this year, right?
To feed everybody, but some of the stories that does come out of this, I think should be good.
Uh the coordinated response team, uh, getting folks to help with the uh open congregate drug use, and that is a citywide team.
And again, all of the increases we have here are really for a citywide services.
No one is benefiting from their district specifically.
Uh this is in collegiality with everybody.
Um, and I I gotta say I have to give a personal shout out.
Council Santana has been fantastic in this process in working together and making sure we get to a good thing.
And I know I've really worked with all the colleagues, and this is a team effort to get here.
Um, there was a lot of things we had to do and and to stay by the rules and everything.
We really did it, and it took a lot, and this this process is designed to be chaotic.
And so I know at times it can seem that.
But I what I hope folks understand is that the folks on this body care about this city and we actually do care about one another.
Uh, and I think this budget, while it doesn't, isn't as strong, this amendment package.
Well, it isn't as strong as many of us would like.
Uh we do understand the constraints with which we are operating.
But CRT, we have age-strong dance to support our seniors.
The Office of Food Justice gets an increase, EMS, uh, health and wellness, which I think is so important because often they're often overlooked in our public safety.
Uh, legacy business grants.
We hope to even try and get more at some point in the future to make sure this year's legacy business grants winner are also uh made whole.
Um there's a procurement readiness pilot, and I'd like to thank Mr.
Culpepper for advocating for that.
We have uh additional at-risk and transitional youth jobs, and I know Julia Council Mahia has been a huge advocate along with Council Santana around that.
Um, the vets, I'd like to thank counselor Ed Flynn for advocating to get veterans' money in there.
Uh we have arts and culture, which I know all of our districts love and make what I make our each individual district beautiful, and so we wanted to make sure we restored more of their grants so that they can continue to do what they do.
Um, and then we have the uh the human uh rights commission restoration, uh, which I think will be a vital thing when we talk about especially where we're going in the future, and the fair housing testing program.
Um so these are the things that are increased that we were all able to build consensus around uh and agree that they should go forward, and we should increase each of these things.
Uh, and I gave you the reason of where the decrease comes from.
Um, and so with that, uh Madam President, uh I would like to conclude uh my the summary of my 1.4 million dollar amendment package that hopefully will gain the support of everybody here because they all had a hand in making this work.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Fitzgerald.
Um, let me see where we're out.
I should keep my list of lights here.
Um, she's writing everything now.
Uh the chair recognizes uh, Santana.
Council, you have the floor.
Oh, hang on.
Hold on, hold on a second.
Let me let me just check my list.
The next one.
Thank you.
Thank you, madam president.
And before I speak to this amendment proposal, I do just want to speak to the public, they're probably wondering why we haven't been here for a couple hours.
And I do want to thank Officer Z, Sergeant Mills, the Boston Police Office who were here, all our municipal offices and property management who worked so professionally and diligently, and got us to a place where we could come back into this chamber and continue this work.
Because if we don't work together and get to a vote by midnight tonight, this budget will just go into effect without our amendment process.
So I just wanted to make sure we thanked everyone who came in to support our work today.
So thank you, madam president.
I have serious concerns about the ethics questions surrounding this process.
I'm talking about the amendments, and I hope these concerns do not come back to harm this council or undermine the work we do today.
But I'm here today to vote.
I have shown up, attended the hearings and working sessions, reviewed the amendments, and advocated for the priorities I believe Boston residents deserve.
I am proud that this package fully restores important funding for age-strong grants.
Our seniors deserve behavioral health support and opportunities to remain connected and engaged in their communities.
This package gives them the dignity that they earned and deserved.
I also support the additional funding for veterans that I have strongly advocated for.
We're asking and we're getting 25,000, and some may ask why do we want to fight for 25,000?
But to me, it's a true placeholder in the veterans' budget.
Anytime something completely goes away, you often never get it back.
So I'm grateful to Brighton Marine for its generous support this year, but private donations cannot replace a dependable city commitment.
We should preserve this line item in the budget.
Once a line disappears, it becomes much harder to bring it back, and history shows it almost never comes back.
So keeping even a modest placeholder protects our ability to continue to advocate for more support next year, especially when the nonprofit partners may not be able to provide the same level of support year after year.
I also support the investments in youth jobs, including the Boston Student Advisory Council positions and all the others, as well as funding for arts and culture grants, housing vouchers, returning citizens, food justice, blackmail investment.
These are services residents see and fail in their neighborhoods.
They support young people, seniors, veterans, families, artists, tenants, community organizations across Boston.
So I hope this body can come together around this modest amendment package.
And I don't believe it's modest because we didn't have the ability to fight for more.
I believe it's modest because we weren't willing to use the power we have, but I'm here to support it, and I'm here to listen to what my colleagues also want to advocate for.
So thank you.
Thank you, Council Murphy.
The chair recognizes Councilor Santana.
Thank you, Madam President.
Um I rise today.
I first want to thank Councillor Fitzgerald for putting this amendment amendment package together.
I think as uh as Councillor Fitzgerald mentioned, um, I think I think we're all experiencing like this has been a very chaotic um experience, but I think in listening to each other um through working sessions here uh in the chamber, I think that this package actually directly um uh speaks to um what many of our council colleagues have been speaking about, right?
So um I I think we we really have an opportunity to be able to come together um today and be able to again make this budget better.
Um I don't think that anyone here say that this is a perfect budget or a great budget, um, but we have an amendment ours to make it better, and I think that this package does that, and I think as Councillor Fitzgerald mentioned, it's about building consensus.
I uh I support all of the um amendments being put here um specifically because um they're citywide initiatives, um, there are citywide initiatives that will impact all of our districts.
Um, and I think that's where uh we could we're gonna be able to build consensus.
So I appreciate your leadership, Councillor Fitzgerald, and I'm looking forward to um supporting this package when that time comes.
Thank you, Madam President.
Thank you.
The chair recognizes Council Flynn, Council, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Yes, you got it.
I also want to say thank you to Councillor Fitzgerald for his leadership.
During this challenging time, and um coming up with a plan that recommendation that um listened to everybody and respected everybody.
One of a couple of the amendments, a couple of the uh departments that I specifically advocated for in this package included the EMS health and wellness, ensuring that EMTs, paramedics, that do an exceptional job for the residents of Boston and visitors, but they also have the health and wellness programs available for them.
I think that I think that is critical.
They have a very difficult and stressful job, and we need to ensure that employee assistance programs, health and wellness programs are there for them.
Oftentimes EMS is overlooked, but I think this is a signal that we respect them and we respect the work they do and their families as well.
I also highlighted and advocated for the human rights commission with Reverend Cole Pepper.
I want to say thank you to Reverend Cole Pepper for working with me on this recommendation when the Human Rights Commission was first established.
It really was supporting gay and lesbians at that time that were victims of hate crime and racism.
Certainly it's expanded, but we need to do the work, the important work ahead to make sure the human rights commission is a place where residents feel heard and are respected.
And that's what I'm committed to doing, working with my colleagues.
The final the final point, veteran services, it's only 25,000.
It's the lowest number on this on this recommendation.
I'm supporting this proposal.
Um I'm disappointed in that figure, but I realize it's this is a compromise.
Um but I do I do want to point out that this figure of 25,000 dollars is very low, and veterans need to be treated with respect and dignity.
I don't I don't necessarily think they are receiving it.
Um it's a step in the right direction, and I'm willing to support that because it is a step in the right direction, but next year we can't, we have to take a strong look at that department and support it with the right resources and support that it needs and deserves.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn.
The chair recognizes Councilman here.
Counselor, you have the floor.
Uh thank you, madam president, and I want to thank uh the public for their persistence in asking us to go a little bit harder and to be a little bit bolder and to actually um fight a little bit harder for uh some of these amendments.
I know when it's my turn to speak on my amendments, I'll be presenting my own for consideration, but for now I am rising to uh thank uh the advocates uh for their um steadfast uh persistence and I will just note that the amendment package that is in front of us, I don't think meets the moment, and it's not going as hard as we need to, and I have heard that we have not been given much to work with, and we can't find any more money, and I believe that there is money out there.
We just are afraid to ask for it.
Um, and so I want to note for the record that we did receive a legal memo stating that we have the power to reject and continue with amendments, and we're not choosing to do that.
What we're choosing to do is water down a process even further.
Um, and while I believe compromise is important, this moment also is asking us to demonstrate that this body can actually push the administration um to tap into the parking media fund to find other dollars, but we are not uh there in this moment, and I am very disappointed in that process.
And I do want to thank Councillor Fitzgerald for his leadership and really trying to bring the body together.
I know it was not easy.
Councillor Fitzgerald, you were able to reach across the aisle and get some folks here.
Um so I I do appreciate you doing that.
And you know that I'm not happy with the um youth jobs line item, and I can't in good conscience uh support something that does not go a little bit harder.
Thank you, Council Mejia.
Chair recognizes Councillor Coleta Zapata.
Counselor, you have the floor.
Thank you so much, Madam Chair.
I do appreciate the move to introduce this amendment package.
I want to thank Council Fitzgerald.
I also want to thank Councillor Henry Santana, who my understanding was uh integral into these conversations and trying to ensure that there was a package that helped to um be representative of everybody's priorities.
So thank you as well to Councillor Santana in your work in getting that done.
And I want to thank Councillor Fitzgerald for separating out Moya from this package that we're talking about now.
Um so there's uh there's something said about these are necessary changes.
There's an opportunity to recalibrate internally, and that BTD uh particular has the bandwidth to do that.
Um, 1.4 million dollars from the Boston Transportation Department in particular is a really tough cut for my district.
Um we also just got a communication from the CFO that clearly states that this will result in layoffs of the transportation department, and I I know for a fact that um I have a lot of constituents that work in the streets cabinet, in particular in transportation.
They're up in the control room, they're parking enforcement officers, um, and so that's that's one reason.
But then in addition to that, um, the issues that BTD works on.
I had my team go back and check our constituent services logs.
Um, they provide vital city services that are important to my residents.
Overwhelmingly, besides public work issues, so trash and um or ISD issues, things related to our things that BTD works on or overseas is one of the top priorities of my constituents.
So, parking enforcement officers.
We have we hear a lot from folks that we need more parking enforcement officers on the streets of East Boston because people park uh in East E and then they go to the airport, they just kind of leave their cars there.
So that's just one example.
Um, but for for those reasons, I um I I cannot uh support this particular section or this um this particular amendment that has been put up by counselor Fitzgerald.
So I will be voting no, um, but mainly for the personnel that are in my district that work in the transportation department as well as the vital services that uh BTD provides my district in particular.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Chair recognizes Councillor Durkin.
Councillor, you have the floor.
Thank you.
We all acknowledge how important these areas of investment are, and that's why I can see some of my advocacy in this package.
But my issue with this package is that the polls from BTD will undoubtedly result in layoffs.
As the chair of planning, development and transportation who oversaw hearings regarding the lack of movement on important transportation initiatives.
I cannot fathom giving BTD less resources to make our streets safer.
If this amendment is added to the package, as a point of unity, I will support the full package, but it always feels like some departments for basic city services are on the chopping block.
I've heard from former employees of BTD that this will have an impact.
Um so I plan to vote no.
Um I acknowledge how important the areas of investment are.
I just wish we were taking it from somewhere else.
Thank you.
Um counselor Mejia.
Um, you've you've already spoken, so uh counselor Coleta Zapata, would you mind taking the chair for a few moments?
Councillor Braden, you now have the floor.
Thank you.
Um I want to thank Councillor Fitzgerald and Councillor Santana for in particular for uh leading this uh consensus building effort.
I think it's really important.
I've been supported supportive of the effort to build consensus throughout the amendment process and offered to ensure this process reflects many community voices that we've heard.
Uh I also want to thank uh counselor uh Weber for the uh the work that he has done over the last two months.
Uh the extensive outreach to in community and town hall meetings, etc.
Um the the the always the challenging last lap of a um of a budgeting process this last few weeks.
I appreciate the intent behind this amendment to broaden consensus, expand the reach of our restorations, and respond to many community voices we've heard throughout this rigorous process.
However, I cannot support this proposed cut to the Boston Transportation Department from my as I as a representative as a as a councillor for all its and Brighton.
This amendment would cut 1.4 million from personnel services at BTD.
It is the second largest cut the council would make in any to any city department.
This is a targeted cut that has the potential to potentially substantially impact our city's ability to improve safety of our community members on city streets and conduct much needed transportation planning.
While I support restoring essential services for our communities, including housing programs, aid-strong, youth jobs, and other critical services, we have to look carefully at where the money's coming from.
Transportation and street safety is one of the top issues that I hear from my constituents in District 9.
In Alson Brighton, families with children, young adults, seniors, cyclists, transit riders, and people with disabilities all want to move safely through our neighborhoods.
Parents should be able to walk their kids to school without worrying each time they across the road.
Last week a neighbor of ours, an 82-year-old, was crossing us on a crosswalk on uh Chesson Hill Ave and was struck by a truck.
She's lucky to be alive.
In April, the council held on hearings, held a hearing to on delays of vital transportation projects throughout the city.
And I remain deeply concerned about the city's current pattern of delay, and I'm focused on advancing a transportation agenda that makes Boston safer, more accessible, and better connected.
We cannot afford to cut the very department responsible for helping keeping our seats safe, streets safe and our city moving.
Boston needs near-term street safety improvements and long-term vision for a more equitable transportation planning.
If this production this reduction is this reduction is approved by the council, it will be up to the administration and BTD leadership to determine how to implement these cuts to this department.
I urge the administration to protect BTD's transportation planning capacity, it's transportation planning positions and ensure that street safety work is not undermined.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Braden.
Councillor Majia, do you not have the floor?
Yes, I have a quick point of clarification.
Yes, Councillor Majia, you have the floor.
Hang on a sec.
Yeah.
Got it.
Yeah, thank you, Madam President.
You know, there's a lot at stake here, and I want to make sure that we are all paying attention and we're getting this right.
It would be helpful through the chair for me to hear from Councillor Fitzgerald the dollar.
I may have missed the dollar amounts for some of his proposals, number one.
And number two, this is my point of clarification.
Because I also have amendments, and what I worry about, because for those folks, there's lots of negotiations already been happening in IGR and the administration has been very busy and really working hard at shipping away whatever votes we had.
So I just want to make sure that whatever we are voting on right now, if this is going to be our last ditch effort to at least get something for community before I make a vote on Fitzgerald's package, and then I also want to propose my amendments for consideration, and I want to know.
We're taking one amendment at a time.
So if you have a direct question for counselor Fitzgerald, like a particular ask, then please please ask him directly and then he'll.
So let me try this one more time in terms of what I'm trying to communicate.
So that way I'm clear.
What I want to make sure is that I don't kill Councillor Fitzgerald's last-ditch effort to try to salvage whatever little crumbs we can get for people.
Okay.
And so I need you to tell me, right?
Procedurally, we're going to first take a vote on Fitzgerald's amendments, and if those die, then it's a done deal for community, because I'm sure that what I'm trying to propose, there's no appetite here to uh take any of these cuts.
We take one amendment at a time.
So, councillor, we're dealing right now with Councillor Fitzgerald's amendment.
Uh we will take a vote on that, and then we'll move on to the next amendment.
And then can we do a reconsideration for Councillor Fitzgerald's package just in case at some point in this session, so that if my amendments die, then the community does not get left without nothing.
That's what I want to know.
I think I think the answer is uh if if counselor Fitzgerald's uh amendment stands, then we will move on and we'll it will be and it will be in included in the pack in the final package.
Also, if you have amendments that you want to offer and they pass, they will we will have to work to make those uh get them included in the final package.
But you know, we have to take one amendment at a time.
We can't muddle the water money in the water.
Could I then ask for consideration?
Um if it's possible, and maybe we might have to take a vote, and maybe maybe Megan could the legal team here can help me with this, but is it possible for us to lay Fitzgerald's amendment on the table, and then I can present my amendments?
No, that's not the way we you we have to take a we have to take a vote on this amendment.
I call to lay his amendment on the table.
I could do that, right?
Thank you.
See, this is why I ask these questions, because knowledge is power, and there's some people in this chamber who have a lot more than others, and you are always utilizing procedural tactics to prevent things from happening, and so therefore, for the record, if I can put a motion on the table to lay counselor Fitzgerald's amendments, so would you like to offer a supplemental amendment to his amendment?
Is that how you'd like to proceed?
So subsidy.
Hold on a second.
Can we take a resistance?
Yeah, brief, very brief.
Don't go anywhere.
We're back.
We're back.
I didn't gavel a recess, so we're right back.
Um, do we have counselor mehia has a motion to lay counselor Fitzgerald's amendment on the table?
Do you have a seconder, Councillor Mejia?
Do you have a seconder, Councilor Mejia?
I'm sorry, thank you.
Mr.
Clerk, you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Mejia's motion to lay Councillor Fitzgerald's uh amendment on the table.
Councillor Brady.
No.
Oh, sorry, beg your pardon.
Councillor Braden.
No.
Councilor Brayton, no.
Counselor Coletta is a part of it.
Counselor Color is a part of no.
Counselor Calpepper.
Councillor Calver, no, Councilor Durkin.
Yes.
Councillor Durkin, yes, Councillor Fitzgerald.
Counselor Fitzgerald, no.
Counselor Flynn.
Yes.
Councillor Flynn, yes, Councilor.
No.
Council, no.
Counselor Mejia.
Yes.
Councilor Majia, yes.
Councillor Murphy.
No.
Councillor Murphy, no.
Councilor Pitten.
No.
Councilor Penn, no.
Counselor Santana.
Councilor Santana, no.
Councilor Weber.
Counselor Weber, no.
And Councilor Warrell.
Yes.
Counselor Morrell, yes.
Motion to lay on the table.
Eight in the negative and four in the affirmative.
Councillor Mahee's motion to lay on the table has not passed.
Let's go.
Where else were we here?
Thank you, Council Mejia.
I think the next person who has not spoke yet, spoken yet, is Councillor Councilman Culpepper.
You have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President.
And uh I hadn't planned to speak.
But I heard Council Mahia talk about this amendment.
And uh all week long we've been working on amendments.
Council Worrell and Store and others, and I went home pretty excited because I thought we had a pretty good amendment package.
And I came back this morning and I looked and we still had a pretty good amendment package.
We had some pretty good numbers in here for the uh human rights commission, fair housing testing program, the Office of Food Justice, the MB MWBE procurement readiness program.
That's a program that I started to get young folks ready for the procurement process.
It felt pretty good until those young folks came in and took over.
And something happened when they took over.
Everybody left, and it was like smoke.
They came back in, then we ended up with this.
And I feel like I'm being told it take this or you don't get anything, because this is not the package that I went to sleep with last night.
Excited about, but something happened when everyone went out and we came back, and this is what we have.
Not only that, we got folks that said no, they don't even want us to get this.
I'm gonna vote for this.
Not because I want to, but because we fought for black male advancement.
That's in that other plan.
We fought for LGBTQ advancement.
That's in that other plan.
We fought for women's, that's in the other plan.
We fought for food justice, that's in the other plan.
We fought for a lot of stuff in the other plan, but we thought we were beefing it up.
And instead of beefing it up, it got beefed down.
But I'm gonna vote for it because if I don't, Councilman's point, we may not get anything.
We do have some good stuff in the other budget that we'll talk about later, but uh, for one who's only been here six months, I'm learning the process.
Thank you, Madam President.
Thank you.
Chair recognizes Council Murphy, and then we'll go back to Consular Fitzgerald.
Thank you.
Council Murphy, you have the floor.
Thank you through the chair to council Fitzgerald.
If I could ask a question about the polls from transportation, please.
If he wants, Councillor Fitzgerald, do you like to answer the question?
Um, I think what I heard is that you said there was three million in underspends from transportation.
Is that true?
And we're only asking for how much?
1.2 million.
Council Ficher, do you have the floor?
Five year historical average was 3.5 million underspend, and we are using 1.4 of that to still allow flexibility for the department.
So a very small portion of the end of spent.
Okay, so seems very reasonable, and there won't be actual people cut off, but just want to remind this body that eight of us voted and it passed.
We just fired laid off 400 employees in the school department last week.
No one seems to be talking about that.
But we're worried about a potential, and I wish we could always keep jobs open and the money there to fund them and advocacy to get people hired, but we know year after year that that's the whole point of the fighting about where to pull from, is that all of my colleagues and they make good points that historical data has shown that department after department underspends, so let's take it where it will hurt least.
But when it came to the BPS budget, we didn't care as a body.
We hit them where it matters most.
And just today in the Globe, another article came out about how BPS is changing the way they teach their special ed students, and it's not going to help.
And we already know we were doing a really bad job.
So I just want to remind everyone that we laid off 400 city employees.
So let's not confuse it.
Just because the school committee has the final vote on the school budget, they are city employees.
They are our colleagues and they are with our children, our students, our future every day.
So I think we need to rethink whether or not we want to support this small package that we should be fighting for more.
But if this is all we can get, I hope we have at least seven to support it.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Um Chair recognizes um.
Let's see where we are.
And Councillor Canada's a pattern.
And then go to Councillor Flynn.
Thank you so much, Madam President.
I think it does need to be addressed and said, I think it's a gross oversimplification to even compare BPS budget to the operating budget, as it's it's it's not, um, and I would like to respond to that directly.
Um, in the city's operating budget, the city council has the opportunity to identify resources and make targeted investments that help preserve uh positions and services.
Many of us have worked to restore these investments.
Um I think that uh we all want to reduce harm or do no harm where we can.
I think the BPS budget presents a different challenge.
The school committee, as mentioned, not the city council, has the uh the final vote over staffing decisions, and the district is confronting long-term enrollment challenges.
We lost 3,000 kids.
There's rising fixed costs, transportation expenses, and state and federal funding pressures that districts across Massachusetts are facing.
I had referenced this in my speech uh last week.
While workforce reductions are deeply concerning and should be scrutinized, the question for the council was whether to fund the overall school budget that continues to educate more than 45,000 students and invest in critical services such as special education, multilingual learning, literacy, and student support.
And so supporting the BPS budget is not endorsement obviously of every staffing decision, it is a recognition that withholding funding from the entire school system would not reverse those decisions and could create additional instability for students, families, and educators.
And so I felt like it needed to be addressed.
Again, I think it's an oversimplification to compare BPS budget uh to the operating budget, and I'm grateful for the opportunity to directly address that.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you, madam chair.
I voted against I voted against the BPS budget.
And the reason I voted against the BPS budget, I felt that the budget really hurt our teachers and especially our paraprofessionals, the hottest, our paraprofessionals, mostly women of color, almost the lowest paid employees in the city, they're working with the teacher as a teacher's assistant basically, trying to manage the classroom.
The paraprofessionals, I tried to stress this the other day.
They help them clean up, they wash their hands, then they come back to the classroom and they work with the other students.
As far as I'm concerned, but the city council voted to cut several hundred of those positions.
That was a moral vote.
It wasn't a political vote, it was a moral vote.
We have the ability to go to bath for people that don't have a voice in the city, and we chose not to go to bath for them.
We can't deny that.
We're going to have to eventually address that issue because it's not going away, and we heard a lot of low-income families in this city that supported special needs children.
And that's that's a major stain on the city of Boston as far as I'm concerned.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn.
Um, I think uh Councillor Culpepper, you're next, and we'll go to Fitzgerald and then back to Councillor Mejia.
Madam Chair, I hadn't planned to say anything about that school committee budget.
I thought I said what I needed to say last week, but when I heard my colleague mention that if we had not passed that budget, it would affect the stability of the Boston public school families.
I thought about what about the Boston public school employees that will lose their jobs and their stability, and what bothers me the most about all of this is that many of the young folks that are now working, they don't have that three years, they're gonna be laid off.
It reminds me of the last hired, first fired, because all these young folks that have been working the last couple of years trying to buy a house or take care of their families, they're now going to be out of a job.
And when you think about how we encourage young folks to go to school, go to college, finish, and when you look at who gets fired, I get upset because I haven't seen any of this statistics, but I know my district, district seven is going to be hit very hard with these layoffs, and what can we do about it?
The vote has been taken, folks are gonna be looking for a job September.
They won't have a job, and those are the families that are going to be destabilized because they won't be able to put food on their tables, they won't be able to pay their rent, they won't be able to get gas with the way gas is going up, and we've already voted down the package.
Today, the school department, BPS still doesn't know how many folks they're gonna lay off.
Even today, I talked to them this morning, they still don't know, and we've already passed the budget, and we're not even thinking about looking at the folks that get laid off.
How we're gonna help them keep a roof over their head, food on the table, and shoes on their feet.
Thank you, Councillor Culpepper.
The chair recognizes Councillor Fitzgerald, and then we'll go back to Counselor Mejia.
Uh I'd just like to make a make uh a motion to vote on the amendment package on the floor if folks had done.
Thank you.
Uh Mr.
Clerk, could you please uh take a roll call vote on counselor Fitzgerald's amendment?
Um, someone did you get second to move the question?
Councillor Durkin?
Councillor Braden.
No.
Council Braden, no.
Councillor Coletta's a part of it, Councillor Coletta's a part of no.
Counselor Culpepper, Councillor Culpepper, yes.
Councilor Durkin.
Counselor Durkin, no, Councillor Fitzgerald, yes, Councillor Show, yes, Councillor Flynn, yes, Councillor Flynn, yes, Councillor Louis Jeanne.
Yes, Councilor, yes, Council Mejia, yes, Council Mehia, yes, Councilor Murphy, Councilor Murphy, yes, Councilman, Councilman, yes, Councillor Santana, yes, Councillor Santana, yes, Councillor Weber, Councillor Weber, yes, and Councilor Warrell, yes, Councilor, yes.
The motion to move the question passes 10 in the affirmative, three in the negative.
Thank you.
Um to move the question.
Move to it.
You vote to put it on for and then we vote.
Yes, okay, yeah.
Counselor, I appreciate it.
Mr.
Chair, could you please take a roll?
Now that we've uh moved the question.
Could you please take a roll call vote to uh uh on Councillor Fitzgerald's um amendments?
Councillor Braden, no counselor braiden, no counselor collar is a part of the council, no counselor callpepper, counselor call pepper, yes, counselor Durkin.
Councillor Braden, no counselor Fitzgerald, yes, Council Fitzgerald, yes, Councillor Colletta's a part of it, Councillor Clara's part, yes, Councilor, Council, yes.
Council Mejia, Councilor Mejia, yes, Councilor Murphy, Councillor Murphy, yes, Council Papen.
Yes, Councillor Penn, yes, Councillor Santana, Council Santana, yes.
Councilor Weber, Councilor Weber, yes, and Councillor Warrell.
Yes, Councilor, yes.
Amendment of Councillor Fitzgerald passes 10 votes in the affirmative three in a negative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Um, does anyone else uh wish to offer an amendment?
Councillor Mejia.
Oh, Councillor Fitzgerald, hold on.
Council Fitzgerald.
Yes, I was just gonna offer another amendment package if you could uh procedural.
Go ahead.
Uh this would be uh the um yeah, I'd have to I'll take five seconds.
Yep, no, understood the well I'm gonna introduce a package around.
Hang on, just everybody sit down, everybody calm down.
Consular Fitzgerald, you have the floor.
I'd like to introduce uh a package around uh reinserting uh the Moya uh that was taken out previously in the original budget.
Yeah, based on the guidance I received from the state ethics commission, I'll recuse myself from this discussion.
Okay, we'll call you back when this is decided.
Continue, Consular Fitzgerald.
I have to read the.
Oh, okay.
Let's get it all in order.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please read uh the uh second amendment from Councillor Fitzgerald?
Second amendment from Council of Fitzgerald, document number 073, message in order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2020 as amended shall be amended as follows.
Moya ESOL grant, decrease Office of Labor Relations Contractual Services, increase mayor's office of immigrant advancement contractual services, $50,000 to be directed toward English for speakers of other languages for parents and caregiver grants.
Decrease office of people operations contractual services, increase mayor's office of immigrant advancement contractual services, $50,000 to be directed toward English for speakers of other languages for parents and caregiver grants, decrease Department of Innovation and Technology Contractual Services.
Increase Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Contractual Services, $40,000 to be directed towards English for speakers of other languages for parents and caregiver grants.
Moya miscellane miscellaneous grants.
Decrease the execution of court special appropriation.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
The Chair recognizes Councillor Fitzgerald.
You have the floor.
Oh, and just uh just to be clear.
Has everyone got a written copy of this amendment in front of them?
Very good.
Thank you.
Continue.
Thank you, Madam President.
As discussed yesterday, uh, to remain far above the expectations uh of uh any advice we have uh some of our colleagues have received uh the mayor's office of immigration and advancement was left out of the original budget.
Uh we had a working session yesterday where we all agreed I would put forth the Mayor's Office of uh immigrant advancement money back into that budget through an amendment process.
Uh this is it exactly as it was taken out with the same from the same increases and decreases, and so I look forward to a vote.
Thank you, Madam Chairman.
Thank you.
Uh Council, do you have a second?
Councillor Durkins, it's a second council um chair recognizes Councillor Mejia, you have the floor.
No, that was when I thought I was going to get called for my amendment.
Okay, thank you.
Would anyone else like to speak on this uh amendment?
Okay.
Um would anyone like to Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Fitzgerald's second amendment?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Councillor Braden, yes.
Councillor Colletta's a part of it.
Counselor Collar is a party, yes.
Councillor Culpepper, Councillor Culpepper, yes.
Councillor Durkin.
Councillor Durkin, yes.
Councillor Fitzgerald.
Yes.
Councillor, yes.
Councillor Flynn, yes.
Councillor Flynn, yes.
Councillor Louis Jen.
Yes.
Councilor Louis, yes, Councilor Mihia.
Councilor Mejia, yes, Councillor Murphy, Councillor Murphy, yes.
Councillor Pipin.
Yes.
Councillor Penn, yes, Councillor Santana.
Yes.
Councillor Santana, yes.
Councillor Weber.
Councillor Rurell.
Yes.
Councilor Warrell, yes.
Second amendment of Councillor Fitzgerald passes 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Could uh Ron, could you?
The messenger, could you uh ask Councillor Weber to rejoin us?
Um Chair Regg uh so Councillor Fitzgerald's second amendment has passed.
Does anyone else wish to offer an amendment?
Councillor Flynn, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Um, do you have a written written copies of your amendment?
Yes, I do.
Um, I believe Sydney's going to uh give them to Ron now.
I believe she's a excuse me, uh Carishma does have them.
Just bear with us for a few minutes, yeah.
Thank you.
So Ryan is just giving this bringing around everyone a copy of Councillor Flynn's amendment.
And then Council um Mr.
Clerk, would you mind reading Councillor Flynn's amendment into the record?
Amendment of Council Flynn, document number zero seven three three message in order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended shall be amended as follows.
Decrease neighborhood services personnel services, increase police department equipment.
$500, five hundred thousand dollars for equipment at the Boston Police Crime Lab.
Councillor Flynn, you have the floor.
Thank you.
Oh, um, Council Flynn, you need a second for your amendment.
Counselor Murphy's a second.
Councillor Flynn, please continue.
Thank you, madam chair.
Madam Chair, I've been working on crime lab related issues for six or seven years now, and I'm making this motion because it is it is my goal, it is my um it is my vision to have the best crime lab we possibly can in the country.
Boston police equipment to enable advanced DNA testing techniques, including Y screening.
This is the most advanced testing on basically testing sexual assault kits for this Y screening program.
These amendments for personnel and advanced testing were previously passed by the city council.
However, it is still unclear if this funding was ever actually reallocated.
In both 2024, 2025, I held a hearing with my colleagues here to discuss the challenges that the Boston Police Crime Lab have and had, including delays in testing of sexual assault kits that I mentioned.
The city of Boston was not meeting the state requirement of testing within 30 days, and at that period had not upgraded their DNA testing techniques to wide screening, which is what the Massachusetts State Police and New York City police have.
I believe we owe it to the victims of sexual assault, their families, and the public at large to both ensure that we are testing sexual assault kits within the state mandated 30-day requirement, which I believe we are, as well as utilizing the most advanced technology available.
And with this $500,000, it could go a long way to ensuring that the Boston Police Department continues to improve their crime lab.
And it's an issue I've focused on and will continue to focus on going forward.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn.
The chair recognizes Councillor Papin.
Counselor, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President.
I'm rising to say that I'm gonna vote no on this amendment.
Completely understand the reasoning for adding the money in the line item to equipment for the BPD, because I know they need it, but where we're pulling the money from is not a good place because the neighborhood services personnel and the work that they do, they're the ones that go to all the community meetings, they're the ones that attend um all the events to make sure that if there is a department that doesn't have a community engagement team, they're the ones stepping up filling those roles.
And I just don't think that this is a good poll.
I recommend that my colleagues also vote no on this amendment.
Thank you.
Thank you, Consul Pepin.
Would anyone else like to speak on this issue?
Chair recognizes Council Durkin.
Councillor, you have the floor.
Thank you, Chair.
Um, I think because this wasn't talked about during the working sessions.
I have no impact, I have no idea the impact on current jobs.
Um I imagine this would result in layoffs in the mayor's office.
Um, and not knowing who those people would be, I will be voting now.
Thank you.
Uh Chair recognizes Council Mejia, you have the floor.
Yes.
Uh thank you, Madam President.
And you know, I I want to note that the reason why we may not have all of the information that is required for us to make educated decisions is because we had one real working session on Monday, and it was four hours, it was five hours long, but not everyone stayed to go back and forth with the hard job of doing the amendments.
So it's going to be a really interesting journey here this evening.
Um, because in reality, the real work was supposed to happen during our working sessions, where we were supposed to build consensus and also build consensus around what decreases we were willing to pull from which departments, but we never got to do that in a real serious way.
So that's why we are here today.
So for those who are paying attention, understand that had we done our jobs the last uh few sessions that we've had, we probably would be having a different conversation today.
Thank you, Council Mahia.
The chair recognizes the chair of lesson means.
Counselor Weber, you have the floor, and then we'll go back to the uh sponsor the amendment.
Yeah, I just want to correct the record a little bit on that.
I believe at the working session we asked for amendment packages, and Councillor Flynn said he did not want to disclose what he wanted to amend and where the money would come from in the working session.
So we definitely had an opportunity to discuss this uh and we didn't um so just to fill in people.
I know uh there was lightly attendant at the end there.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Weber.
The chair recognizes Councillor Murphy.
Councillor Murphy, you have the floor.
I wasn't gonna rise, but it's kind of feels like it's turning into a tit for tat.
I was definitely at one of the working sessions where we weren't talking about specifically where the money would go.
But counselor Flynn gave a I thought very thorough reason why he was willing, and he even said, I know I will get flaked for this, I know people will not be happy, but here are the departments I am willing to pull for.
And if I remember correctly, which I think I am, it was minutes before the chair adjourned to the meeting because then another amendment package was brought up.
So counselor Flynn did list an ONS was definitely one of them, and he gave his reasons why.
One of them being that it has grown significantly in these past years under this new administration.
So just to set the record straight, thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Murphy.
Anyone else wait to speak who hasn't already spoken?
Councillor Flynn, you have the floor, thank you, madam chair.
Just to correct the record, I was very clear in the amendment process at the budget uh budget hearings where I was going to pull this from.
I listed several city departments, including Office of Neighborhood Services.
I didn't miss one budget meeting the entire time.
Um I was very clear, I've said it several times.
I was going to take it from Office of Neighborhood Services.
I understand people may not like that, but you can't say I didn't say it on the record.
Um I understand there's a lot of political support for the Office of Neighborhood Services.
That's fine, but there also has to be support for the crime lab as well.
We have to prioritize what is more important, Office of Neighborhood Services, Community Engagement, or Crime Lab.
That's a fair question.
That's a fair question.
If you think the Office of Neighborhood Services, then then that's fine.
But I I think the crime lab deserves equal attention than politics, and that's why I'm advocating for that because I believe we need to have a state-of-the-art crime lab in in Boston.
We don't have it.
We're currently hiring a executive director at the crime lab because the previous executive director was on leave for extended period of time.
We don't have the right management in the crime lab as well.
But while we're not focused on the crime lab, and it's kind of operating itself, I'm gonna do my due diligence to provide the best leadership I can for the crime lab for the crime lab.
But this is an important vote.
Do we put politics ahead of public safety?
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn.
Would anyone else wish to speak on this matter?
We'll move to a vote then.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Flynn's uh first amendment?
Councillor Braden.
Uh no.
Councillor Braden, no, Councilor Colletta's a part of.
Councillor Colorado's a part of no counselor callpepper.
Councilor Culpepper, no, Councillor Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, no, Councillor Fischer.
Counselor Fischeral, no.
Councilor Flynn.
Yes.
Councillor Flynn, yes.
Councilor Louis Jen.
No.
Councilor Louis Gen, no.
Councillor Mejia.
Councilor Mejia, no.
Councilor Murphy.
Counselor Murphy, yes.
Councillor Penn.
No.
Council, no.
Councilor Santana.
Councillor Santiana, no.
Councillor Weber.
No.
Councillor Weber, no, and Councillor Worrell.
No.
Councilor Orell, no.
Amendment of Councillor Flynn.
11 votes in the negative and two in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Uh, Councillor Flynn's first amendment has not passed.
Councilor Flynn, I understand you may have a second amendment.
Yeah, I um I have two more.
Um, Chair recognizes Council.
Uh have you got copies?
We need copies.
Okay.
Uh, some of the here they come.
Somebody's gonna run her.
Uh we'll just take them.
Counselor uh Mr.
Clerk, do you have a copy?
Yes.
Would you like to read uh Counselor Flynn's uh second amendment into the record, please?
Amendment of Councillor Flynn, document number 0733, message and order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended shall be amended as follows.
Decrease neighborhood services, personnel services increase Boston Police Department contractual services, $500,000 for health and wellness services for Boston Police Department.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Councillor Flynn, do you have a second?
Yes.
Counselor Murphy, your second.
Councillor Flynn, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Health and wellness for city employees is critical.
Boston police officers, in my opinion, have a very stressful job.
Many of them, or most of them, are working 16 hours a day.
I want to make sure that we have the necessary resources and support for officer wellness and health for police officers and their families.
When we send a police officer on a 16-hour-a-day shift for five days a week, we have a responsibility, in my opinion, we have a responsibility to ensure the mental health of the officer as well and the family.
We just can't expect that a police officer is going to work 16 straight hours, and then we're not going to have the necessary resources and support to support that police officer and his or her family.
I do think it's an important issue.
I do acknowledge that people will may not support it because it's the Boston police.
And they deserve a fair shake.
And a fair shake to me means ensuring that when we give an assignment for someone to work 16 hours a day consistently for years, eventually they need the mental health and wellness programs.
We don't have it right now.
This is our opportunity, I believe, to stand with our city employees, our neighbors, to ensure that we respect the job that they're doing, but we're also providing the critical support in mental health services that they need and deserve.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn.
Um Councillor Mejia, you have the floor.
Do you wish to speak to this issue?
Okay.
Um I'll switch this off then.
Would anyone else like to speak on this amendment?
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Flynn's second amendment?
Councillor Braden.
No.
Counselor Braden, no.
Councillor Coletta's apparel.
Councillor Zapata, no.
Councillor Culpepper.
Councillor Culpepper, no.
Councillor Durkin.
Counselor Durkin, no.
Councillor Fitzgerald.
Councillor F.
No.
Counselor Flynn.
Yes.
Counselor Flynn, yes.
Councillor.
No.
Councilor Lujan, no.
Counselor Mehia.
Councilor Mehia, no.
Counselor Murphy.
Councillor Murphy, yes.
Counselor Penn.
Council Penn, no.
Councillor Santana.
Counselor Santana, no.
Councillor Weber.
Councillor Webber, no.
And Councilor Warrell.
Second amendment of Councillor Flynn.
Two votes in the affirmative and uh nine votes in the negative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Counselor Flynn's second amendment has not passed.
Councillor Flynn, you have a third amendment.
I have a third one.
I don't expect my colleagues will support it, but I do have a third one.
And it's certainly your privilege.
I support their amendments, but they won't support my amendments.
Counselor.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please read Councillor Flynn's third amendment into the record?
Document number zero.
Amendment of Councillor Flynn, document number 0733, message and order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended shall be amended as follows.
Decrease neighborhood services permanent employees increase by a department contractual services.
$500,000 for mental health services, safety, health and wellness programs, and cancer screening for Boston Fire Department.
Councilman, you need a second.
Have you got a second?
Yes, I haven't.
Thank you, Councillor Murphy.
Counselor Flynn, you have the floor.
Madam Chair, many of us went to the wake in West Roxbury for firefighter killed off.
Many of us went to the funeral at the Cathedral of the Holy Cross Church in the South End.
We went there to pay our respects to this firefighter for the incredible service, the supreme sacrifice he made to our city.
At the same time, Madam Chair, is it is it fair?
Is it fair to this for this party to ask?
Can we ensure that firefighters and their families have access to cancer screening?
Health and wellness programs.
Do you know that the average when a firefighter retires at the mandatory age, the number of years on average they live is about five years?
I go to their banquet.
I think Council Murphy attends and Council Fitzgerald attends.
We go to the banquet and we we talk and say thank you to the retirees.
And at the same time, we know that they're going to collect their pension, and it's likely that they're gonna live five years with that pension.
But as city counselors, can't we do something more than that than show up to a retirement retirement banquet?
Can we put money in the budget so that they can get cancer screening?
Is that a lot to ask for?
That they can get health and wellness, employee assistance.
They're not asking for a lot.
I think they're asking for a little support here from our colleagues on the Boston City Council.
This shouldn't be a political issue.
This is about this is about supporting our neighbors that are firefighters in their families.
Health and wellness of firefighters is critical.
Cancer screening is critical.
If we help and identify cancer in one firefighter, then we've done our job.
We know men, young men and young women are diagnosed in firefighters have a high cancer rate.
Are we willing to maybe tell the mayor's administration that you know we might have to cut some services at Office of Neighborhood Services?
Why?
Because we think, as a body, we think health and wellness of firefighters and their families is important.
We know by voting yes, you might get into a little bit of trouble with the administration, but you're going to be doing the right thing.
You can hold your head up high and say, I went to bat for a family that needed employee assistance.
I went to a bat for a firefighter's family that needed various health and wellness programs.
I know because I served 24 years in the Navy.
Health and wellness programs are critical.
You don't just send someone into a dangerous job and then when they come home and say, Oh, by the way, you're on your own.
That's our job as city councillors, is to make sure that we support their families.
We support firefighters, we support our first responders.
That's what they asked for.
That's what they ask us for.
Um that's all I have to say on this.
Um, I do want to respectfully ask my colleagues to put politics aside and do the right thing.
Do the right thing on this one.
You'll you'll be proud of your vote.
I'll guarantee you that you'll be proud of your vote.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn.
The chair recognizes Councillor Murphy.
You have the floor, and then we'll go to Counselor Peppen and then Council Santana.
Thank you, Madam.
Thank you.
So I know we've spoke about this before.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn, for putting this through as an amendment.
I think it was in our original package that dwindled down between those hours when we needed to recess.
But just to be clear, when the fire department came before us to talk about their budget, they were concerned that this year they did not receive the 1.2 million dollar grant that they have been receiving in past years that supports 150,000 of that did support cancer screening, but it also supports mental health, health and wellness, the employee assistance program where they support recovery services.
So it was more than just cancer screenings.
I know that the mayor had a press conference and Dana Faba stepped up and they gave 150,000 to make sure that the cancer screening piece will be covered this year, which is great, but we still have 1,050,000 of support that is no longer going to our firefighters, and counselor Flynn made it clear, and I know I've said this many times on the floor, that our firefighters are at risk for so many things, like all of our first respondents are.
So I think it's important that we find it, and the mayor can always find a way to spend other money if needed.
But if we send a message that all of us want to make sure that the firefighters get this money back into the budget, and if she does not want to take it from ONS, she can find $500,000 somewhere else.
So if we send the message that we don't want it vetoed, we can do that.
So I'm hoping our colleagues join us.
Thank you, Councillor Murphy.
The chair recognizes Council Papin.
Counselor Pepin, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President.
I rise again to say that this is not about what the amendment actually stands for, but more of a concern about where we're pulling from.
I think we all in agreement with what Councillor Flynn is saying right now.
The firefighters do need support.
We were all at that funeral that day.
We all talked to the fire union.
We all talk to the commissioners and to the firefighters from our district.
And I know that the firefighters in the firefighter union were also at a press conference with Dana Farber to make sure that they were getting the support that they needed in order to serve their firefighters.
What I don't feel comfortable is taking away money from a department that residents in my district, day after day, I have a vacancy right now in one of my neighborhoods, and they keep saying, when is this going to be filled?
Because it is a very important decision where residents reach out for day-to-day services.
And what I don't want to see is the day that Matapen, Rosino High Park, or Southeast, South End, or Chinatown, don't have a liaison that they can go to because at the end of the day, the services that they provide.
This is why it's so difficult to compare departments because we could talk about the importance of one and not the other, but they do provide crucial services that our residents depend on, and they call on us to make sure that they also have the support.
So again, I just want to make sure that I emphasize that it's not about not standing with the fire departments, it's about having a legitimate concern of where we are pulling some money from.
That's why we voted no, and I recommend my colleagues do the same.
Thank you, Councillor Pepin.
Um, anyone else wish to speak on this amendment?
Counselor Flynn, you'd like to, since no one else wishes to speak, you have the floor.
Right.
Thank you, madam chair.
Just one minute at this stage.
We're on your second round.
Madam Chair, making this process is difficult to make when you when you advocate for something, you have to pull it from another department.
If someone wants to tell me where they want me to pull it from, I'll do that.
But that's the process we have.
I'm making I'm making a recommendation.
Based on my experience.
I think I think district city councillors can also do the job of ONS as well.
Thank you, Council Flynn.
Um, Madam Chair, I I do want to continue.
I do want to continue.
Um, but I I do feel like this body is more concerned with politics than they are with helping people, helping our first responders.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you.
Chair recognizes Councillor Durkin.
Counselor, you have the floor.
Thank you so much.
Um, our firefighters are deeply important to our city, and um the idea that um voting on this is political here.
I mean, if it's being made political, it's being made political by the folks that are bringing it because today we have a real opportunity here um to talk about the great partnership that Dana Farber is stepping forward.
Um I was proud um to call Dana Farber, uh great uh, an incredible um group of uh an incredible institution in my district who just permitted the first world class cancer hospital in the city.
I was proud to be a part of that.
Our Article 97 amendment that we passed through this council with my leadership just passed the Senate.
So uh fighting occupational cancer is is all of us have been part of that work, and so I want to thank my colleagues for their continued support to end occupational cancer.
I think what's missing from this conversation as well is EMS, and so while I'd be voting no today, my work and my um my charge and occupational cancer for city employees will not stop.
Thank you, Councillor.
Uh Durcan.
Would anyone else wish to speak who hasn't spoken?
Thank you.
Yeah, the just to correct the record straight to correct the record.
Um we are discussing EMS.
I was the one that put the money into EMS for health and wellness, so I'm not sure why why that comment came out that we're not focused on EMS and health and wellness.
I advocated strongly to ensure that that got into uh the amendment process led by Council Fitzgerald.
But that's not the that's not the point.
The point is there's a significant amount of money that was cut from the health and wellness of the Boston Fire Department.
Yes, Dana Fabra can contributed 200 to 300,000 dollars, but there's still a significant amount that was cut.
And can I can I finish my comments, please?
No, no, I'm not sure.
No, but I was being heckled.
Counselor Flynn, I've given you many times to come around, and I'm I really just I'd ask my colleagues not just no comments on other people's conversation um statement right now.
And Councillor Flynn, please um please continue.
Thank you, madam chair.
I I do I do believe we we can make a statement here that the life of firefighters and their families are significant, they are important.
We should not overlook that.
Um let's let's do the right thing, let's do the right moral thing today.
Let's support our firefighters.
They deserve it, they need it, their families need it.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you.
Um seeing no other um request to speak on this issue, Mr.
Clerk.
Could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Flynn's third amendment?
Councillor Braden.
No, Councillor Braden, no, Councillor Killeth is a part of it.
Councillor Cullerpepper, Councillor Culpepper, no, Counselor Durkin, Councillor Durkin, no, Councilor Fitzgerald, Council Fitzgerald, no, Councilor Flynn.
Yes, Councillor Flynn, yes, Council Lou Jen.
Council, no, Councilor Mejia, Councillor Mejia, no Councillor Murphy, Councilor Murphy, yes, Councilman.
Council of Penn, no, Councillor Santana, Council Santana, no, Councillor Weber, Councillor Weber, no, and Councilor Aurel.
Councilor, no.
10 votes in the negative and two votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Um Councillor Flynn's third amendment has not passed.
Councillor Flynn, I understand.
Do you have another amendment?
No.
Uh the chair recognizes Councillor Julia Mejia.
You have the floor.
Uh thank you, Madam President.
Do you um before we start?
Uh do we have our copies of your amendment on the toll that central staff has them?
Allegedly.
Yeah, they're coming.
I don't know.
We need to all right, you guys.
I'm making it come.
Can we have one for Mr.
Clerk first?
Um, did we not?
Yes, it's this.
Yeah, it's this one.
Did we not?
This one.
Good job.
I have a few.
I have a few.
That's fine.
We'll start.
I'm gonna let everybody know I got one, two, three little packages.
Three little packages.
So that means that three times the uh central staff will come out with a piece of paper.
Mr.
Clerk, would you mind reading Councillor Mejia's first amendment into the record?
Amendment of Council of Mejia, document number 0733 message in order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended shall be amended as follows.
Decrease Boston Police Department personnel services, increase Office of Food Justice Contractual Services, $50,000 for food justice grants.
Decrease Boston Police Department Personnel Services.
Increase Mayor's Office of Housing Contractual Services, 130,000 for Grow Boston.
Decrease Boston Police Department Personnel Services.
Increase arts and cultural arts and culture contractual services 475,000 for arts and culture grants.
Decrease Boston Police Department personnel services, increase Boston Veterans Engagement Transition and Services Contractual Services.
$200,000 for veterans grants.
Decrease Boston Police Department Personnel Services, increase youth employment and opportunity contractual services.
$2,225,000 for success links grants.
Thank you.
Thank you, Madam President.
And I rise to make a motion to amend Docket 0733 by adding additional amendments to make the funding for how the Office of Food Justice Grow Boston Arts and Culture whole, as well as adding 200,000 for veterans and 2.25 million for youth jobs in contractual services for a success link program.
I have three amendment packages that I will be putting on the floor today, one at a time.
So thank you, Madam President.
I'm proposing this package today because the proposed amendment package in front of us is claimed to be a restoration budget, but still leaves room for half of the nearly two 20 million in cuts still unresolved.
And I want to know again for the record.
We still, we had over 20 million in cuts, and lots of it is still unresolved.
This package will make the funding for the Office of Food Justice, Grow Boston and Arts and Culture whole, as well as adding 200,000 for veteran services and 2.5 um 2.2 for youth jobs in contractual services for success link.
We need to be bold and propose more than 9.4 million in amendments, and this package seeks to do just that by closing uh more of the gap that's still left.
I tried to bring this version uh of this amendment forward in our working session on Monday to engage in a consensus building uh exercise, but my colleagues um, you know, but some of them just they didn't not want to be fully engaged.
Therefore, I'm bringing it here, this package to the floor to have a transparent debate on this proposal.
This package is a win for community and this council.
It takes very little from pro from police salary savings and overtime to fully or partially restore six main priorities for this body and community.
This moment is calling us to invest in community.
And so therefore, I am going to ask my colleagues for consideration.
Thank you, Council.
Thank you, Council Mejia.
Would anyone like to speak on this amendment?
Okay.
Okay.
Mr.
Clerk, could you move the motion?
You seconded the motion.
Did you?
Okay.
Mr.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Council Mejia's first amendment?
Councillor Braden.
No.
Council of Braden, no.
Councillor Killeth is a part of.
Council Culpepper.
Councillor Culpepper, yes.
Counselor Durkin.
Council Durkin, no.
Councillor Fischer.
Council Fischer, no.
Counselor Flynn, no.
Council Finn, no.
Council Lou Jen.
No.
Council, no.
Council Mejia.
Council Mejia, yes.
Councilor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, no.
Council of Penn.
Council Papen, no.
Counselor Santana.
Council Santana, no.
Council Weber.
Council Webber, no, and Council Warrow.
Council, yes.
Nine votes in the negative and three votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Council Mejia's first amendment has not passed.
Council Mehia, you have your second amendment.
So I want to note for the record here, we only have a little over three million dollars that we're trying to tap into for the police over time and uh underspending in personnel vacancies, and we're not asking for a lot.
Uh before we start, uh I would like to start by asking um Mr.
Clerk to please read Council Mejia's second amendment into the record, please.
Second amendment of Councillor Mejia.
Docket number 0733, message in order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended shall be amended as follows.
Decrease youth employment and opportunity personnel services, increase youth employment opportunity contractual services, 250,000 for success link grants.
Mr.
Councillor Mejia, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President.
Oh, do you have a second?
Do you have a second?
Council Murphy, thank you.
Please continue, Council Mejia.
Yes, um, so thank you, Madam President, and I rise to make a motion to amend Docket 0733 by moving 250,000 for youth jobs funding not specified for BSAC or red shirts from personnel services, specifically emergency employees, from there to contractual services within the chair's proposed amendments.
This is so that the funding goes towards success link and so that the nonprofits receive these funded youth jobs instead of the city.
As typically, success link supports approximately 70% of school year youth jobs, and this is my amendment package uh too.
Uh, you should have copies, right?
And you do.
Great.
As the proposed amendment from the chair for the youth job stands, all 750,000 is going towards personnel services, which they are for city jobs.
Within the 750,000, it is separated out into three lines, which are general personnel services, BSAC, and red shirts.
I'm proposing to move the 250,000 for generic personnel services from there to contractual services.
This amendment puts this 250,000 into funding the Success Link program, which typically, like I said earlier, um hosts approximately 70% of school year uh youth jobs.
Seeing that none of the youth job funding in the chair's proposal was allocated for success link, this program.
I'm hosting the majority of the school year youth jobs.
I want to move the proposed youth funding uh that was not specified, at least put some in the city funding to the program success link, also support our nonprofits by providing them youth workers without having to fund those positions themselves.
Also, we cannot rely on promises of private corporations for the supposed 2,000 jobs.
We are still waiting for an MOU regarding the mayor's youth private funding announcement.
The least that we can do is shift at least 250,000 into Success Link from the City Jobs Youth, so that we can please give them a few pennies to our youth and our nonprofit organizations.
And so I just want to know for the record, right?
Like as we continue to say that we care about young people, that they are our future.
This is our opportunity to demonstrate that we want to invest in them accordingly.
So I'd like to see where we land with this one.
Thank you.
Would anyone else like to speak on this uh councilme here's amendment?
Okay, Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Council Mahia's second amendment?
Councillor Braden.
No.
Council of Braden, no.
Councilor Colletta's apartment, Councillor Killers Apartment, no, Council Culpepper.
Yes.
Councillor Culpepper, yes.
Councillor Durkin, Council Durkin, no, Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fitzgerald, no, Councillor Flynn.
No.
Council Flynn, no.
Council Lou Jen.
Council Louis, no.
Council Mejia.
Yes.
Council Mehia, yes.
Council Murphy.
Yes.
Councillor Murphy, yes.
Council Defense.
Council Penn, no.
Council Santana.
Councilor Santana, no.
Counselor Weber.
Councilor Weber, no.
Counselor Worrell.
Councilor, yes.
Second Amendment of Councillor Mejia.
Nine votes in the negative and four votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Counselor Mejia's second amendment has not passed.
Council Mejia, you have a third amendment.
Yes, I do.
Um Mr.
Clerk.
Would you mind uh reading Council Mejia's third amendment into the record?
Third Amendment of Council Mejia, document number 0733.
Message in order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended shall be amended as follows.
Decrease mayor's office of housing contractual services, increase youth employment and opportunity contractual services.
$250,000 for success link grants.
Yes.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Just to check, has everyone got a written copy of Council Mejia's Third Amendment in front of you?
Thank you.
Thank you.
You have the floor.
You know, this feels like the hunger games here.
We're all trying to stay alive.
Um I am very disheartened by the fact that we can't even have the political courage and or will to just fight a little bit harder and to uh to do a little bit more, especially for our young people.
So here we go.
Uh thank you, madam president, and I rise to make a motion to amend Docket 0733 by moving 250,000 from access to council.
That's the package that we're looking at right now, um, and uh move it to youth employment and opportunity contractual services within the chair's proposed amendments.
This will get us to at least a million dollars for youth jobs in the council's amendments.
This is my amendment package three, and you have it in front of you.
Um, they are nearly right now six million dollars in cuts to youth jobs in the proposed budget.
The chair's proposed amendment packages only fund $750,000 for youth jobs.
I'm just seeking to add only $250,000 to go towards the city funding for youth jobs so that we can at least get to a million.
Anything less is a spit in the face of community and our youth.
Many of my colleagues claim to support youth jobs and youth and our young people, and this is when we put our money where our mouth is.
And I'm putting this funding into contractual services so that it can go directly to Success Link.
And so as I explained before, these dollars can go directly to the nonprofits that are supporting our young people.
And before anybody uprises, I just want to know for the record that while I understand and appreciate access to counsel being important, I'm not taking all of it, I'm taking a portion because I know that the mayor is probably tomorrow going to announce a private partnership with some legal defense fund uh to step in the gap of certain things.
So since we're giving money away, might as well just you know take money from one place because we know we're probably gonna fill it up with something else somewhere else.
So, you know, at the very least, let's go see what happens.
Thank you, Councillor Mejia.
The chair recognizes Consular Pepin, and then we'll go to Consular Weber.
Counselor, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President.
Again, appreciative of the amendment.
However, as a chair of housing, I highly recommend my colleagues to not pull any money from the Department of Housing due to the fact that it is probably one of the top, if not the top, issue that we're facing right now, especially something like access to council, where it helps families.
My understanding is actually families with BPS kids from facing evictions.
Um, and I just had a meeting with housing leadership about a couple weeks ago now, where we are facing eminent threats of losing even more funding from our federal government that's supposed to go into the housing department.
So I just highly recommend us do not pull any money from our housing department, if it is contractual, if it is personnel, if it is for vouchers, et cetera, anything inside that department, it is crucial at the moment that we hold firm and keep that in there.
So that's why I'll be voting no on this specific amendment.
Thank you, Madam President.
Um Chair recognizes Council Weber, Councillor, you have the floor.
Yeah, thank you.
I'm just gonna stick up a little bit for the access to council program.
Over 100 families a year.
Uh have are prevented from facing eviction.
These are these are BPS families, so uh please do not cut the access to council program.
Thank you.
Chair recognizes counselor uh counselor Flynn, you have the floor.
Yeah, thank thank you, madam chair.
Um, I'm undecided on this um on this one here, but could I just ask the the maker?
Uh could she just give me a little bit more background on the access to council program?
Um so just so I have a good idea of um what what I'm voting, what I know what I'm voting for, but what I would be voting against.
Alright, so for those who are my turn, counselor, you have the floor.
Thank you.
So those who for those who are tuning in, I want to be really clear.
I am not cutting money from housing.
There are legal defense funds, there are lots of nonprofit organizations that provide legal support to folks who are dealing with eviction, and that is a fact.
Okay.
And because we are dealing with this budget crisis right now, all I'm asking for is a portion of the access to council line item to support youth jobs.
I am not gutting it completely.
All I'm trying to do is take a little bit from it to help us restore some dignity in this process to support youth jobs.
Because there is this narrative here, this fear mongering going on here, that everything that we're gonna do is either going to get people laid off, fired, you know, people are gonna end up in housing court without no support.
That's not true.
That's not true.
There's I'm not taking all of it, I'm taking a little bit from it.
So don't get it confused here.
Um, and so it is only 250,000.
And if you don't like that price, let's bring it down some.
Thank you, Councillor Mejia.
Um, um, Weber, I will actually uh Councillor Durkin had her light on.
I will come back to you or do you to clarifying point?
Okay, and then we'll go to Consular Durkin.
Thank you.
Okay, the count access to council programs is innovative, like for the nation pilot.
Uh, we funded it at 450,000, so taking 250,000 is much more, you know, I don't know, 60 percent, uh, you know, 70% of it.
Uh and so that would gut the program that is really helping people.
If you've ever been to housing court right across the street, there's tons of folks in there who have no representation, uh, despite the the fact that there's uh groups that are trying to help people.
There this is a very valuable program that keeps our BPS kids from being homeless, being put in shelters outside the city and having to be bust in at a great cost to uh to the city.
So this is a program that has shown to work for two years that we as a council put forward.
I hope we continue to support it.
Thank you, Counselor Weber.
The chair recognizes Consular Durkin.
Thank you so much, Chair.
Um I have been a huge proponent of the Access to Council program since we originally passed it.
Um to my chagrin and to many of our chagrin, this is something that came out of the city council that then when it sort of got piloted, um, we saw the mayor's team taking a lot of credit for its success.
Um, and I think I have been the first one to say like thank you to Councillor Weber for putting this in place.
Um I think that BPS families having access to council that are facing eviction is incredibly important, and so um so I think pitting uh youth jobs against um BPS families facing eviction is unnecessary in this process, and I stand uh with the chair.
I think that this I honestly wish we could put more money into access to council than we have this year.
Um, so thank you, Councillor Weber, for your leadership.
Um, and I'm I was surprised that it wasn't in this year's budget.
So I think this is something that the council has the ability to fully restore, which we have in the initial package, and I truly believe in it.
And I think that it actually will save the city council or save the city a lot of money because we are every um BPS family that ends up being in a homeless shelter outside of the city ends up being bust in at tremendous cost, like like the chair said.
So thank you, Chair.
Thank you.
Um the chair recognizes Councillor Flynn.
Uh, this um council Flynn, you have to.
Thank you, ma'am.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Um, I do want to go on record in support of um council Mejia's proposal.
I do want to at least support one of them.
Um, I do think it's a worthy worthy proposal.
I listen to the young people across the city at every at every budget hearing, and do want to stand up for them the best I can.
The other point I do want to make is for me, it seems like if you if you amendments weren't part of kind of like the official the official report, you know, if you have your own individual amendments that they're just going that they're just going to get voted down.
I don't know what what kind of process that is.
You know, it's not even like we're voting with an open mind, which is voting no consistently, even if we support the program.
Um so I'm kind of discouraged that we're automatically voting no just because it wasn't part of the um you know the the established the established docket here.
So just want to highlight that.
Thank you, madam chair.
Thank you, Consular Flynn.
Um, would you like a last word?
Uh, Counselor Mejia, you've got your light on.
Sorry, you're standing, so um either.
Do you wish to speak?
Hold on, there you go.
Consular Mejia, you have the floor.
Um, thank you, and I do appreciate my council colleagues uh as someone who uh dealt with housing insecurity growing up and as a BPS graduate, I know how important it is to have stable housing.
Um, and so by no means do I want to create any hardship to folks who are already experiencing further harm.
And so I think it's important for us to recognize that we are in harm reduction right now, and what I'm thinking about is the fact that so many young people are usually sometimes working to help support their family so that they can stay housed.
And so I'm looking at the bigger picture here, and this is a prevention and intervention amendment.
But I understand the tension that exists, pitting housing versus youth jobs, because both of those are equally important.
And to that, if you all are not interested in taking it from housing, then I think I'm going to ask for a reason because I don't think it's just that we like this whole entire amendment exercise that that one single dollar was approved to increase youth jobs.
And so I am going to take I'm going to request a recess to see where I can find another 250,000.
No, Councillor Mejia, we're going to continue.
Anyone else wish to speak in Council Mejia's amendment?
Um Mr.
Clark, could you please take a roll call vote on Council Mahia's third amendment?
Councillor Braden.
No.
Council Braden, no, Councillor Collette is a part.
Council Culler has a pilot, no.
Councillor Culpepper.
Counselor Calpepper, no.
Councillor Durkin.
Councilor Durkin, no.
Council Fitzgerald.
Council Fitzgerald, no, Councillor Flynn.
Yes.
Councilor Flynn, yes.
Council Luigi.
No.
Councilor Lu Jen, no.
Council Mejia.
You know, the state had eight million dollars left.
Um, Council Mejia, we're taking a vote.
And 10 million of that was spent for access to council.
So there is money out there.
It's going to go for the record.
Like we're just choosing not to see it.
But council Mirror.
Council, yeah.
Councilor Mihia, yes.
Counselor Murphy.
Yes.
Counselor Murphy, yes.
Councillor Penn.
Councilor Penn, no.
Councillor Santana.
No.
Counselor Santana, no.
Councillor Weber.
Council Weber, no, and Council Warrell.
Yes.
Counselor, yes.
Nine votes in a negative and four votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Council Mahia's third amendment has not passed.
Council Mejia, do you have any further amendments?
No, sir.
I don't think so.
I think my amendments have all died.
Thank you.
I'll be going to a funeral.
Thank you, Councillor Mejia.
The chair recognizes Council Culpepper.
Councillor, you have the floor.
Madam Chair, the amendment.
I move to amend Dr.
Dr.
733 for an order regarding the Boston Fire Department.
Thank you.
I think it's been passed and distributed.
We do some business.
We don't have it here.
This is Councillor Culpepper's first amendment.
Do you have a second?
No.
This is my first and last.
Council Murphy is your second.
Thank you.
Mr.
Clerk will read it into the record and then you can speak.
So okay.
Excellent.
Mr.
Clerk, have you got a copy of Council Culpepper?
Yes.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please read Council Culpepper's first amendment into the record?
Amendment of Council of Mignon Culpepper, document number 0733, message in order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended shall be amended as follows.
Decrease Boston Transportation Department Contractual Services increase Boston Fire Department supplies and materials.
$200,000 for the procurement of PFAS free turnout gear and protective equipment for firefighters.
Chair recognizes Councillor Culpepper.
You have the free turnout gear and protected equipment for Boston firefighters.
Well I appreciate that this investment currently appears in Chair Weber's amended budget as a recommendation, madam president, recommendation is not enough, especially when you're dealing with lives of the firefighters.
This council believes this is a priority that we should actually fund it and incorporate it into the budget itself rather than merely expressing support for it.
Boston firefighters put their lives on the line to protect our residents from immediate danger but increasingly we are learning that many firefighters also face long term dangers from the very equipment designed to keep them safe.
Studies have consistently shown that firefighters experience disproportionately high rates of occupational cancer and PFAS chemicals have been identified as a significant concern in turnout gear and protective uniforms.
Massachusetts has already taken important steps and departments across the country are being the transition to safer alternatives occupational safety experts and firefighter organizations have made clear that as PFAS free turnout gear becomes available department should move aggressively toward replacing legacy equipment containing harmful chemicals this amendment is about acting on the information we have today rather than waiting until years from now on to say we should have done more we ask fighter fighters to run toward danger every single day the least we can do is ensure that the equipment we provide them does not expose them to preventable risk long after the fire is out I respectfully ask my colleagues to support this amendment I'd also like to read something Madam President exposure to PFAS is linked to cancer including kidney and testular cancer thyroid disease and reproductive issues and I think that for us not to pass something to give them at least a pilot is in some ways irresponsible they wouldn't have to go to Dana Farber for the cancer test if we got them the PFAS equipment Quincy just bought many sets for their firefighters Madam President and my colleagues I ask you to support this amendment to provide PFAS free equipment as a pilot for all firefighters thank you Madam President Thank you Counselor Culpepper the chair recognizes Counselor Flynn and then we'll go to Councillor Murphy Council you have the floor thank you madam chair I I do want to say thank you to counselor Culpepper for bringing this forward I think this is the the most common sense amendment and important amendment tonight in my opinion in for for many reasons but it's it's easy it's easy for us to support this we should all be voting for it it's not he's not asking for a lot of money 2000 is not a lot of money it but the the money in the the grant the pilot will help so many firefighters and this is an easy one for us to support we should all get on board this one because it's critical as counselor Culpepper said that we provide firefighters with the critical resources support that they need to prevent to prevent um health related issues and I just want to again say thank you to councillor Culpepper for taking the important lead on this and I I do want to I do want to make one short short story my my uncle Dennis Flynn was a firefighter and he was a decorated Vietnam veteran as well serving the army he died at a young age for um heart related disease in a heart attack um at a young age but he was he was one of the closest people to me but I think about him I think about them every day and I wish these programs were available when when he was around and they were around what Councillor Culpepper is is asking for is a little bit of respect for firefighters and their families that's the least we can do as city councillors.
Thank you, Madam chair.
Thank you.
Chair recognizes Councillor Murphy.
You have the floor.
Thank you, Madam president.
Thank you.
Councillor Culpepper for putting this forward.
I just want to go back four years ago when any of my colleagues who were with us then, and we put forth our first amendment package where I think 90% of it got vetoed, and then those that got finally passed, we realized the very important difference between an inter and an intra-departmental amendment.
And so any recommendation, which is an intra within the department, and it says recommendation, so I appreciate the chair didn't leave that word out, but we're still waiting on the answer, which many of us know that even those amendments that aren't just recommendations that are inter, which are pitting, and it was said uh during the last amendment where someone was advocating for something that I don't want to pit one department against the other, all of this amendment process is always pitting one department against each other, not just some of our amendments every single time.
We have to pull from somewhere.
So an intradepartmental amendment is nothing.
Even more so than the amendments, which we know the amendments aren't really anything.
They're all basically recommendations, but to say that because we voted and passed this package that the chair put forth and we have turnout gear and we have money for ISD, and we put money back into the bridge the gap grants for Boston vets, like it's it's just saying you should do this, and we know they're not going to, because history in the data has shown that they have.
And so I am hoping, because it's a small amount, that if we vote, there's a better chance that it will be executed if we can get it into an actual amendment and not just an intradepartmental swap.
So thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Murphy.
Would anyone else like to speak on this issue?
This amendment.
Um Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Counselor Culpeper's first amendment?
Thank you.
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Councillor Braden, yes, Councillor Collette is a part of it.
Counselor Color is a part of no.
Counselor Culpepper.
Councillor Culpepper, yes.
Counselor Durkin.
Councillor Fitzgerald, Councillor Fischer, no, Councillor Flynn.
Yes.
Council Flynn, yes, Councillor Louise N.
Councilor Zen, no.
Counselor Mejia.
Councillor Murphy.
Yes.
Councilor Murphy, yes.
Councillor Peppin.
Councilman, no, Councillor Santana.
Council Santana, no, Counselor Weber.
Councilor Weber, no, and Councilor Warrell.
Counselor, yes.
Five votes in the affirmative.
No.
Councillor.
Durkin, no.
Seven votes in a negative and five votes in the affirmative.
Um thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Counselor Culpepper's first amendment has not uh passed.
Um anyone else have uh for an amendment.
Seeing no more amendments, we're going to take a brief recess to add the amendments to the docket, so each counselor will have it before them before we go to a final vote.
So I have no idea what time it is, because my seven o'clock um 15.
Uh we take a fifteen-minute recess because um and thank you.
Uh don't go too far.
We'd like to keep going and uh get through this process.
Thank you so much.
Brief recess for 15 minutes, and Thank you folks for back in session.
Uh Kurishma is passing out the final draw, the final docket uh of the final uh budget packet of with the amendments.
Oh, we have to do that.
Oh, here we go.
Okay.
Um, yes.
Um thank you.
Everyone should have the the final uh we're is everyone back?
Yes.
Yes.
We will now move on to the final vote on uh the docket zero seven three three.
Mr.
Clerk, will you please call the roll a roll call vote on docket zero seven three three?
Roll call.
Oops.
Yes.
Thank you.
Roll call vote on docket number zero seven three three.
Councillor Brady.
Yes.
Councillor Braden, yes, councillor Killers are part of.
Yes.
Councillor Killer is a part of.
The roll call vote is already started.
Um, I have a property.
Mr.
Clerk, can we rewind?
Councillor Mehio, you have the floor.
Um so we're already moving for a vote.
What has happened in the recess is we consolidated all the amendments that were passed.
Okay, so and they were merged with the original um uh docket that um the chair uh offered.
So the amendments have been added, and now we are at the stage of uh holding the final vote on the docket zero seven three three.
Passing the operating budget, time out because before we do that, we just received a big packet.
It's the same docket as you had this morning with the three the two amendments added.
Yeah, I hear you.
I hear you.
Um before we vote on the whole package, I am looking to make my final remarks.
Uh, Councillor Mahia, you can have two minutes of final remarks.
Okay, so as we take this vote today, I want to acknowledge that while some of the restorations and investments I fought for were included.
The total amended budget before us now does not come close to fully addressing the extent of approximately 20 million in cuts that communities have raised concerns about.
This body had an opportunity to send this budget back to the mayor and require a more collaborative process to make the changes necessary to pre to produce a budget that better reflects the needs of our residents.
Instead, we are frequently asked to accept a package that has already been negotiated without meaningful involvement from the full council.
There's always been a true working, there's never really been a true working session where all counselors collectively sat down and reviewed each amendment and each poll, as we've done in previous years, and determined together where reallocation should come from and where investments were to be made.
That is what a legislative budget process should look like.
Instead, decisions are often presented to us after the behind the scenes conversations, and then we are expected to simply accept them.
I want to be clear that these comments are not directed at any individual.
This is about the process itself.
I know that some of my colleagues may end up steamrolling community and passing this amendment budget, so I fought for amendments in the case that the budget is passed as amended so that we can attempt to restore more of the cuts.
My colleagues to and my colleagues to vote no in order to vote down the docket as amended so that we can then pull docket 0733 as originally submitted by the mayor from the green sheets so that we can put a rejection vote on the floor.
As that is what community has advocated for.
My council colleagues to join me in voting on this amended docket so that we can do the work of rejecting.
And so that is my hope that we can do that.
Thank you, Councilman.
Two minutes.
Anyone else wish to speak?
Mr.
Clerk.
Will you please to call a roll call vote?
Oh, make your pardon, Council Culpepe.
I did not see your light on.
Thank you, Madam President.
Well, here we are.
I want to thank all the members of this council who rolled up their sleeves, who collaborated, who refused to accept the first version of this budget as a final word.
Your commitment to this city and to the people who needed most made a difference.
This is what government looks like when we take our charge seriously.
Want to thank Councillor Fitzgerald for his work in bringing amendment forward.
And I want to thank all my colleagues.
Now I want to speak directly to the advocates who were in this room and for those that are still working.
Every person who has the standard Come on, man.
You've been resolved, so we're back in session.
I will return to our colleague, Counselor Culpepper.
You uh may finish your remarks, and I've been informed by the clerk that everyone who wishes to speak can speak for ten minutes.
You have the floor.
Your commitment to the city and to the people who need it most made a difference.
This is what government looks like when we take our charge seriously.
Now I want to speak directly to the advocates who are in this room, and for those who are still who still are, and to those who are listening.
You showed up, and it mattered.
Every person who was vulnerable to stand up and share their story, who trusted that the lived experience matter, that it would be heard, that it would move something.
You testified, you wrote emails, you called our offices, you protested, you got arrested, you showed up the hearings in town halls when it would have been easier to stay home.
There is something powerful about a young person who looks at the world as it is and refuses to accept the world as it must be.
Our partners in this work.
I've carried your testimonies with me in every room that came with me into every working session and to every answer I demanded from this administration onto this council floor when I fought to restore these cuts, and at every moment I refuse to let this budget move forward without accountability to the people it affects.
It's undeniable that this budget season has been a fight, but your voices change how it was fought.
And so I say to you, young folks, don't stop, don't grow wary.
The arc of progress does not bend on its own.
It bends because people like you get up every day and push.
What you have shown this city is that when the community speaks with one voice, this council must listen.
This is not just a victory for this budget.
This is a blueprint for every fight that comes after this one.
This process brought up something that I cannot leave unsaid.
This budget forced us into the deeply troubling position of choosing between communities that depend on the city the most, as if the needs of our seniors and the needs of our young people, the struggles of one neighborhood, and the struggles of another were somehow in competition.
That is not a choice any of us should ever have to make.
And while I acknowledge the very difficult, the very difficulty of a tight budget like this one, the answer to a fiscal challenge can never be to place that burden on the shoulders of those who are already carrying the most.
A city is well positioned and as progressive as Boston must be more creative, more innovative, more committed to finding right solutions that do not ask our most marginalized residents to fight each other for scraps.
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
Just because an issue does not touch your district or your community, or does not make it any less a threat to the health and the soul of this entire city.
We rise together, or we do not rise at all.
But today, today we are reminded that when people speak, change is possible, that when we stand together, this city can and must do better.
Your power is real, your voice matters, and now and we will not rest.
Thank you, Council Culpepper.
The chair recognizes.
I will recognize you, and then I'll go to Councillor Pepin and then Consular Flynn and then Consular and Cleta Zapata.
Council Mejia, you have.
Let's say what is it?
I have seven minutes.
Seven minutes.
Excellent.
Thank you.
And you know, I know it might look funny that I want to keep speaking, but I think it's important because I worked really hard to be here to be uh the microphone for the people that I serve.
So I'm gonna keep on.
So I want to just read um a few paragraphs from the legal memo that was submitted to us, which I know you all got via email from the uh the lawyer Murphy has to me and Leah.
And so it's uh regarding the analysis of the Boston City Charter Section 48, amended in 2021.
Because we received a memo from the mayor's team regarding what we could and could not do and what the ramifications of that would be, and that was what was used to scare us into um to behave.
And so that we just got this when we got it, but here is a few little experts that we should be mindful of.
Dear Mr.
Williams, you asked us for a legal opinion concerning the meaning of certain language in section 48 of the Boston City Charter as it was amended in 2021.
The language at issues relates to the interpretation of the process for approving the annual municipal budget and the budgetary responsibilities uh appropriated between the city council and the mayor.
As part of this analysis, you also offered a memor uh memorandum from the corporate council for our review and analysis.
In preparing a response to these questions, we have review, we have received the following information.
You know, they they received this uh the the Boston City Charter dated January 2025, a prior version of the city charter of as of July 20 uh 2007, copies of the earlier amendments to the municipal budget provisions of the Boston City Charter, request from Councillor Edwards to the clerk uh Maureen Feeney to submit a written ballot question for approval of the votes dated April 28, 2021, review of the meetings, um the meetings of the Boston City Council when it was voted and proposed amendments to Article 48 of the Boston City Charter on December the 9th, 2020.
Let me just skip because I got a little bit of time left.
The current Boston City Charter Language.
The Boston City Charter includes a provision entitled Creation and Approval of the Municipal Budget, Section 48 of the Charter.
This section was amended by the acts of the legislature 1909, 1974, 1982, and 1986.
So there was amendments throughout those years.
Most recently, the charter was amended by ballot votes of the voters of November in November 2021.
The Boston City Council voted proposed charter amendments on December the 9, 2020 and submitted them to the Attorney General for review.
You guys know the history.
Let me just go cut to this chase here.
The current version of section 48 of the charter states as follows, underline the provisions of the new language added after 2021.
The mayor and the city council of the city of Boston shall hold budgetary powers together with the power to modify in whole or in part an appropriation order or an item within an appropriation order amended, amend the budget for the Boston public schools consistent with the Acts of 1936.
There's some blah blah language there, I'm gonna skip because that's a lot of numbers there.
Um to further put uh so basically here the this charter clarify budgetary procedures and take such other actions as are necessary to amend, approve or disapprove the annual budget for the city, accepting the powers to originate an appropriation order which shall be reserved for the mayor for the mayor to further public engagement and democratic involvement, which there was none in city spending.
The city of Boston shall create by city ordinance an independent office of participatory budget, which we've never really fully funded, with an extend with an extended oversight board to create and oversee an equitable, an equitable and by of participatory budgeting with the external oversight board, and so that is still yet to fully manifest.
So the mayor, no later than the second Wednesday in April of each year, should submit the city council the annual budget for the current expenses of the city and county for a forthcoming fiscal year.
And the mayor may submit thereafter such supplementary appropriation orders as they deem necessary.
No later than the second Wednesday in June.
The city council shall take definite action on the annual budget by adopting amending or rejecting, provided that the amended version shall not be for a budget uh high for a higher total budget than originally proposed.
In the event their failure to act on a budget submitted by the mayor, the items and the appropriation orders of the budget as recommended by the mayor shall be in effect as formally adopted by this council and approved by the mayor.
The mayor should have seven days from the time of budgetary vote to the council to approve return said budget to the council, and the event of the failure, the mayor to act on the budget approved uh by the council, the budget shall be in effect as approved by the council.
The mayor may modify a budget approved by the council by returning it to said council with amendments to any line item provided that a vote of two-thirds of the council should be suffice, sufficient to override any budgetary amendments in whole or in part, or an overall budgetary veto of the mayor.
Now, the corporate council's analysis of the new charter is uh there's a bit of a conflict here because IGR, which is the intergovernmental relations here in the city of Boston, which set out an analysis of the applicable procedures regarding the budget process, the mayor is required to submit a budget to the council by the second Wednesday in April for fiscal year 2027.
That date is April the 8th.
The council is then required to take definite action, definite action by the second Wednesday in June, which uh for fiscal year 2027, which was today, June 10th.
The mayor may then resubmit a budget to the council within seven days.
Corporate council concluded that in the case where the count where the council rejected the budget, the process, the process had two endpoints.
First, if the council rejected the budget more than seven days prior to June 10th, there would have been time for the mayor to resubmit a budget, either the same or amended.
By the time the council, and in time for the council to act by approving amending or rejecting the budget prior to June 10th, corporate council also concluded that if the council rejected the budget less than seven days prior to June 10th, the mayor still had seven days to resubmit a budget, but that June 10th deadline still loomed, and the council is likely precluded from taking definite action, and the mayor budget passes.
Thank you.
One more paragraph.
In effect, corporate council concludes that any vote by the council to reject a budget must occur no later than June 3rd, or the council may waive its right to vote the mayor's budget because the council vote to approve or amend a budget resubmitted by the mayor.
However, corporate council made it clear that the council had the right to approve, amend, or reject a budget resubmitted by the mayor, and the rejection vote.
This is a long analysis.
I'm gonna print the whole thing because obviously I'm not gonna have all the entire time.
Basically, we were led to believe that we were not going to be able to continue even if we reject and even if we reject the budget today and send it back.
We still have June the 17th to continue deliberation.
So I don't know why we are losing hope at this moment.
Thank you, Council Mahia.
The chair recognizes Councillor Pepin.
You have the floor, and then we'll go to Councillor Collette and then Councillor Durkin.
You have the floor, Councillor.
Thank you, Madam President.
I would like to start by expressing my sincere gratitude to the chairbridge and means Councillor Weber for my colleagues on the council and the administration, the advocates, department leaders, between the organizations, the residents who participated throughout this process.
It has not been easy.
It's been a long process, but there's been moments where we've agreed, moments where we've disagreed, moments where we've challenged one another's assumptions and approaches.
But I ultimately believe that this is a perfect example of what a healthy democracy looks like.
Today I'll be voting in support of amendment package because I believe it holistically captures the needs and concerns of the residents I represent, the residents of Boston as a whole.
These amendments restore funding to programs and departments that provide life-changing services to our residents.
One example is the restoration of the H strong grants.
For many of our seniors, these programs are not simply activities on a calendar.
They are lifelines, they combat isolation, they create community, they provide opportunities for engagement, wellness, and dignity.
Just yesterday, I met with leadership at Ethos, and they expressed grave concerns about the potential loss of this funding.
They spoke about the difficult decisions they would have to be forced to make, and how reductions could limit the number of days they're able to provide services to seniors.
Listening to those concerns reinforced for me that these budget decisions are not abstract, they have real consequences for real people.
When we restore funding for programs like this, we're helping ensure that a senior has somewhere to go, somewhere to connect with, and something to look forward to each week.
These amendments also include funding for ESOL classes.
And I cannot help but think about the recent graduation ceremony at the Rosalind Library that I attended.
The room was packed with ABCD and casually housed celebrated adults who have successfully completed their English language courses.
For many of those graduates, learning English is not just about language, it is about opportunity.
It is about securing employment, supporting a family, participating more fully in civic engaged civic life, and building a future in the city they call home.
When we fund these programs, we are investing in people's potential.
The amendment package also includes something like funding for housing vouchers.
For some families, that assistance may represent the difference between remaining in Boston and being forced to leave.
It may be the last lifeline available before a family runs out of options.
Housing for me, as a chair of housing, remains one of the greatest challenges facing our city.
And while no single amendment solves that challenge, every resource we can provide matters.
Every family we can help matters.
That is why the work we are doing today is so important.
These investments are not theoretical, they are life-changing.
We have seen organizations such as Brighton Marine step forward to support programming for our veterans.
We have seen agencies and partners identify opportunities to provide school year-round employment and workforce opportunities for our young people.
That is a model that I strongly believe we need to continue to embrace.
Government cannot solve every challenge by itself.
We must continue bringing together nonprofits, businesses, educational institutions, philanthropic partners, community organizations to maximize every available resource.
We need an all-hands-of-deck approach that supports residents from the oldest among us to the youngest.
We all recognize that municipalities across this country face growing uncertainty.
We know there are serious concerns about the future of federal funding streams that many residents depend on.
Just recently, I met with leadership for a housing cabinet, and they share concerns about the potential loss of federal support for transitional housing programs.
These concerns are real, the threats are real, and if those resources disappear, local governments will be asked, like ourselves, to do even more with even less.
The challenges ahead of us are real.
I remain optimistic, however, because I have seen what can happen when people come together.
I have seen it during this budget process.
I have seen it in our neighborhoods, I see it every day in my district, and I've seen it in the advocates who testified in the organizations that stepped up, and the colleagues who did roll up their sleeves and worked towards solutions.
So today's vote for me is important, but our work doesn't end just with this vote here tonight.
Tomorrow, next week and next month, we will still be tasked with finding ways to improve public service, expand opportunities, addressing housing challenges, support seniors, invest in our youth, and ensure that every resident has a fair shot at success.
That responsibility does not stop with this budget, and neither will our commitment.
Our residents need us to work together.
They need us to continue bringing different perspectives to the table.
They need us to continue challenging one another, collaborating with one another, and ultimately delivering the results.
Because despite our differences in approach, I truly believe we all want the same thing.
And it's what I want.
A city where every resident has a better opportunity to succeed and better brighter tomorrow to look forward to.
So today that's why I'm proud to support this amendment package.
I'm proud to work with you all, and I'm ready to continue partnering with my colleagues, community organizations, advocates, and residents to meet the challenges that lie ahead.
Thank you, Madam President.
Thank you, Councillor Pepin.
Next up, Councillor Caleda Zapato, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President.
Before I begin, I do want to start with gratitude.
I first want to thank Councilor Weber for your leadership throughout this process.
I think you've done an incredible job with a really difficult year, and so I just want to give kudos to you.
Again, you found more money this year than than ever before, and we're working with less, so just congratulations on that.
I think you've operated in good faith and given grace to those who have not operated in good faith, quite frankly.
And I just want to give you your flower because I think that you deserve them.
I also want to thank Harishma and the entire central staff team, including Ryan.
I want to thank my staff who have showed up while I've been on maternity leave.
I want to thank community members who showed up to all of our community budget town halls.
Thank you, Councilor Weber, for coming to East Boston and listening to residents and advocates.
I also want to thank my incredible husband Sebastian and thank Joaquin for being such a good boy today while his mom was here and mom and dad were here.
I'm very grateful for the support that I have in my life and in my village so that I can do this job and try to represent my constituents the best to the best of my abilities.
This process is difficult because the fiscal circumstances before us are difficult.
The FY27 budget, as we all know, has only grown 2.1%, which is the smallest increase we have seen in decades.
At the same time, Boston is confronting lower property tax growth, declining development activity, reduced permit revenues, increased health care costs, collective bargaining obligations, and a broader economic uncertainty.
Earlier this month, the council unanimously approved the use of nearly 70 million dollars from reverse from reserves to close current fiscal year budget gaps.
Those realities are our facts and they require us to make hard choices.
And that is why I continue to believe that the responsible pathway forward has always been to amend and not to reject.
I'm happy that one of my colleagues had talked about the uh the charter amendment.
I was literally there when it was written in those rooms and in conversation with community when we brought it to the attorney general's office to see its constitutionality and get it on the ballot.
Um in 2021, Boston voters expanded this authority of the council because they wanted us to vote to do more than simply vote yes or no.
They gave us that authority to amend the budget, establish priorities, and make difficult decisions.
Today's amendment package demonstrates exactly how that authority was intended to work.
The amendment package before us restores fundings, as it's been mentioned to housing vouchers, youth jobs, access to council, aid strong, arts and culture grants, food justice grants, down payment assistance tenant stabilization, uh, blackmail advancement grants, and other critical initiatives that residents across Boston rely upon.
These are important investments that impact all of our districts and citywide.
I also have a responsibility to uh to listen carefully to the information we have received, both from central staff and the administration.
According to the CFO letter, further reductions would result in layoffs, reductions in constituent facing services, and we've talked about this at nausea, but I do think again the amendment package brought forth by the chair is responsible, and it is something that we should all be proud of.
And so that's why I support Council Weber's package because it reflects months of work, thoughtful compromise, and a serious effort to maximize the authority voters entrusted to us while make while maintaining our obligation to preserve core city services.
I was struck by a recent GLOBE editorial that made a simple point.
If counselors disagree with the mayor's priorities, then we should use our amendment authority to change the budget.
We should identify savings, reallocate resources, and take responsibility for the choices we make.
That is exactly what this package does.
It moves beyond symbolic disagreement and towards actual governing, not political posturing.
The strongest argument for amendment over rejection has always been that amendment requires prioritization.
Today we have an opportunity to improve this budget, restore critical investments, exercise the authority Boston Borders gave us, and move the city forward responsibly.
And for those reasons, I will be supporting this amendment package, and I respectfully urge my colleagues to do the same.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Coleda Zapata.
The chair recognizes Councillor Durcan.
You have the floor, and then we'll go to Councillor Warrell.
Thank you so much, Chair.
Um I just want to point to a comment from my colleague, Councillor Cole Pepper.
I truly believe that if we all care about Boston, we all care about all of Boston's neighborhoods.
And representing District 8 is the greatest honor of my life.
The West End, Beacon Hill, Back Bay, Fenway, and Mission Hill, are so unique in their own ways.
And so being able to vote on an amendment package that serves the entire city is of utmost importance because we really do all rise or fall together.
And like Councillor Claude Zapata said, this is the biggest amendment package ever under the 2021 Charter Amendment with even less resources.
This amendment process required partnership.
And I want to thank Councillor Weber for his leadership.
I know this has not been easy, but for those of us that attended, you know, the majority of the 40 plus, you know, ways and means hearings.
We saw your leadership and we saw what you brought to the table every single day.
I think the budget, and it's clear the budget is our core responsibility as city councillors.
So it's not a surprise that we're here late on a Wednesday to get this done.
We've seen the importance of partnerships in moments like these and private public collaborations to strengthen city services, particularly when federal and state funding becomes uncertain or reduced.
I'm proud to have worked with Dana Farber Cancer Institute to provide to help provide and fund cancer screenings for our firefighters following federal cuts.
In addition, the administration expanded youth employment opportunities and strengthened services for veterans who have served our country and deserve reliable support from our city.
I look forward to continuing this work together as the chair of pilot and asking our institutions to continue to step up.
I think through this budget, we're saying that arts and culture are not optional in our city, that small businesses are valued, that our aging population deserves support and programming, that our BPS families deserve access to counsel when they're being evicted, that black men in our city deserve investment.
Yes, this year is challenging, and next year is going to be even harder.
Costs will continue to rise, and slowing housing production and decreasing revenue, we are going to face similar choices.
Meanwhile, residents are leaving Boston because they can no longer afford to live here.
We must do everything we can to support housing growth in our city.
Truly, the reason why this budget is smaller than in previous years is because we haven't seen the same level of growth.
We must do everything we can to support and sustain our tax base over the long term.
And this remains one of my top priorities.
And by working together as a body, we can advance policies that would make a true impact.
Last year I introduced a zoning amendment that universally kept passed the council to make housing and allowed use in the bullfenge triangle.
Today there's a proposal at 2 to 2 Friend Street that was previously planned as lab that will now deliver over 200 new homes in the West End.
That's exactly what we should support, eliminating costly parking mandates to make housing less expensive to build, and ultimately right now, these are making uh rentals and and to buy more expensive in our city.
And if we're serious about addressing our housing crisis and ensuring Boston remains a city where everyone can afford, we actually have to remove barriers to housing.
The challenges we face during this budget cycle have only underscored how urgent this work is.
More growth equals a bigger budget.
So I think we need our money to be where our mouth is on these issues because the reality is we can't afford to live in a city that is unaffordable.
For every family that's struggling to stay and survive, we have a responsibility to them.
We're all sitting in these seats because we care deeply about our city and the people who call this beautiful city home.
But I and I believe this budget reflects our shared responsibility to be good stewards of our public resources.
We're protecting city of Boston jobs, and we're investing in what matters most to our residents.
And for that reason, I'll be voting in support.
But I can't look at all of you today and not see that every single decision we make, whether it's at licensing, at ZBA, at the BPDA board, they all impact our city budget.
And I think that we need to view those conflicts as things we have to address in order to get to a bigger budget next year.
Because we can't continue to ask, I mean, the idea of oh, we're asking for crumbs.
It's really important here that we realize that we have a role to play in the revenue streams that exist in the city.
And so I will continue to lead that charge as our housing advocate and as our growth advocate on the city council, and I hope that my colleagues will join me in that fight.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Dirk.
And the chair recognizes um Councillor Warrell.
You have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President.
Um, I just want to thank everyone who uh participated in this process.
Um, one uh quote or phrase that comes to my mind is difficult times do not relieve us of our responsibility.
They clarify our mission.
And one thing I just do want to correct the record for, I know I've heard this a couple of times is that the FY26 operating budget only grew by two percent, two percent, which is 96 million dollars, and the FY27 budget grew by 99 million dollars.
It's only a small difference, but the FY26 operating budget did grow by less.
Time and time again, we hear the same message.
There's no money, it is going to get worse.
Do not ask for more, do not expect more, and don't even imagine more.
But in one of the wealthiest cities in the country with a 4.9 billion dollar budget, nearly 2 billion in reserves, and a track record of collecting more than 200 million above projected revenue, I have to ask who says there's no money.
Who gets hurt when the public is told that less is the only option?
Who gets left behind when communities are trained to believe that asking for investment is asking for too much?
We should plan for uncertainty, we should protect the long-term fiscal health of the city, but we cannot confuse fiscal discipline with disinvestment.
Because if our caution always leads us to cuts in the same communities, then we are not just budgeting carefully.
We are choosing who has to wait.
I want to now take the time to thank all the residents who engage in this process.
When residents organize, provide remarks, and let us know what their priorities, that is not anger, that is democracy at work.
When advocates challenge us to do better, that is not theater, that is accountability.
When counselors use all the tools voters gave us in the charter, hearings, amendments, overrides, questions, debates, amending, and rejecting the budget, that is not obstruction, that is representation.
When a community is not the one losing programs, it can be easier to mistake urgency for anger.
When a neighborhood is not the one being disinvested, it can be easier to call patience a virtue.
I don't want to get into people's politics, however, the people of Boston are ready for this council to start doing more.
They want us to use every lever of government to make the city more fair, more affordable, and more inclusive.
If we're gonna make, if we're going to be a city for everyone, we have to be willing to push every lever to make it one.
It is 2026.
Our disparities are real because our unwillingness to change has also been real.
At some point, we have to stop measuring progress by what we call ourselves and start measuring it by what impact we have made.
So the work ahead is bigger than any single amendment package.
We have to change the process itself.
The council needs real power over how revenue gets set and how the budget gets built, and that's not just the ability to react to what lands on our desk.
That is the next fight, making sure this council is not just hearing residents' concerns, but has real power and all the information needed to act on them.
To the advocates and residents who made your priorities clear at every step, today is not the end of anything.
It's the beginning of the next phase, and we'll continue taking it on together.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Warrell.
The chair recognizes Counselor Flynn.
Counselor, you have the floor.
Thank you.
Then we'll go to Counselor Murphy.
Thank you, madam chair.
Um I was thinking most of the day about what residents of Boston are doing, watching this program on cable television, watching this debate take place.
But I was thinking especially about the paraprofessionals, and I was thinking about our Boston Public School teachers that will not be returning in August or September to their classes that they love, to the students that they love.
I'm thinking about them and wondering what are they thinking of what's happening today on the Boston City Council?
Do they think we've effectively advocating for them?
And I think the answer is no.
When the Boston City Council, the City of Boston, does not provide justice to teachers, to paraprofessionals, most women of color, low wage workers.
When we don't provide justice for them, we've lost our way.
And we can't tackle big issues when we treat people so disrespectfully, in my opinion.
I think we have to have a serious conversation going forward on this body about what we're going to do in terms of supporting the lowest wage city workers, which are our paraprofessionals and our teachers.
We talk about supporting our city employees.
We didn't support paraprofessionals.
We look them in the eye, and we say to them, we cut your $35,000 a year job because we didn't think you were important.
We didn't value you.
There were more important issues for us to deal with than supporting paraprofessionals.
Can you believe that argument that we made?
Yes, there are other issues, people will say.
Ed focus on other issues.
Well, I have.
I focused on public safety, I focused on human rights, I focused on quality of life issues, I focused on neighborhood services.
I constantly focus on fixing elevators in the BHA system.
But I still come back to this issue.
And the most progressive city in America, probably the most progressive body in America, the Boston City Council.
But what can we do now?
We all acknowledge now that we we screwed them, but what can we do now to make it up to them?
Can we help them find a job?
Can we help them with food access?
Can we help them with child care, with daycare?
Can we improve their life just a little bit?
Because they're struggling right now.
They're without a paycheck.
In the most wealthy city in America, we have people that are going without food.
We talk about food access.
Well, these paraprofessionals won't have food access because we just gave them a pink slip.
We gave them a city council resolution, we shook their hand, and after we shook their hand, we gave them a pink slip.
That's not the Boston I was raised in.
That's not the Boston I'm from.
The Boston I'm from was always about social and economic justice, social, economic, and racial justice.
We've lost our way.
What do we do to make it up?
What do we do to make it up to those families that lost their job and special needs children that rely on that incredible service?
Those teachers provided, those paraprofessionals provided.
Who's going to go into those classrooms and help manage the classroom?
And sure each child gets the right amount of time so that they can figure out how to fix a puzzle, make a puzzle, maybe do a little bit of reading, maybe escort the child when the child needs to do to go to the bathroom, help them wash their hands.
Who's going to do that work?
Are we going to ask the teacher to do that work to add more duties onto his or her assignment?
And what about the child?
The disabled student that has less support now in the classroom.
What do we say to the parent?
That we're cutting the programs and services your child desperately needed.
Is that what we're about in this city?
I think we're at this position now based on overspending for so many years.
We didn't practice fiscal discipline, fiscal responsibility, accountability, transparency.
We all know that this budget process wasn't fair.
We didn't really have a voice in the budget process.
Today, they were fighting for summer jobs and year-round jobs, but we all knew that there was little to be done for them.
But we went through the process anyway.
But I think when people come to the city council, they come here because it's the last resort.
This is the body that has always listened to people that didn't have a voice in government.
You could come to the city council and explain your case and tell why we need more services for youth, why we need more recovery recovery services for people in need.
But now the city council doesn't focus on those quality life issues anymore, neighborhood services anymore.
We're not attached to the people like we should be.
That's my opinion.
People might disagree with me.
But I don't think we conducted ourselves in a good manner for the residents of Boston.
We let a lot of people down by our actions, by our votes, by our unwillingness to listen, by our disregard for common sense and fighting and fighting for people in need.
But never giving up on residents, especially residents in need, residents in public housing, residents that are struggling.
I told you about my friend Steve that had a double amputee, a disabled veteran living at Ruth Barkley apartments.
He couldn't access his apartment.
He slept at South Station.
What do we say to Steve when we see him on the street?
Thank you for your service as a veteran.
But by the way, Steve, the elevator's been always busted.
You're just going to have to sleep on so on South Station tonight?
Is that about social and economic justice?
I think the city council has lost its way.
I'm still willing to work with everybody to address these quality life issues, these critical issues about social economic racial justice, but we have to acknowledge residents of Boston have lost faith in us as a body.
And we need to demonstrate a willingness to treat people with respect and dignity going forward.
Thank you, madam chair.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn.
The chair recognizes Counselor Murphy.
You have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President, and I did speak earlier on why I was supporting not just this amendment package, but if it passed the vote, so I don't have to get back into all of that.
But one of the things I did say was I'm proud that this package fully restores important funding for our age strong, our seniors deserve the behavioral health support, the expanded engagement grant that was cut from many centers across the city, and opportunities to remain connected and engaged in their communities, and that this reinstatement I believed restored the dignity that our seniors deserve and earned.
But I know we just got this printed out, and thank you to Ryan and Kurishma for working through that last break to get all the numbers done.
But when I was just reading through these pages, I do just have a question through the chair to the chair on age-strong expanding engagement grant.
This amendment seeks to restore $500,000 to the age-strong expanding engagement grant within the expanding engagement.
Funds are specifically intended to support continued senior programming in West Roxbury.
And as an at-large city councilor, of course, I care about all of my seniors in the parkway.
I've been to the Elks and was there when we were happy and supporting expanding to a third full day, or not full day, but of programming paying ethos.
But I also know that I heard directly, and we did from seniors at the Golden Age Center in Chinatown.
We know that in Mattapan in Grove Hall and in neighborhoods all across the city of Austin, that this expanding engagement grant was supporting so many of our seniors.
So I do have a question because I was not aware that that $500,000 was only going to go to support West Roxbury.
So if maybe that's not true, so if someone could just explain to me if that is true, thank you.
I believe the package I put forward was 1.2 million for age-strong.
There was a bunch of grants that were cut, that's one of the grants that was cut, and there are other cuts that are restored in that package.
Oh no, I see that.
And then there's a third one that says 250 to programming, but specifically to the expanding engagement grant, because I know more than one center was receiving that.
Is it true that our putting back these grants will only support the West Roxbury Center?
I know there are two others, but they're specific to, let me just read the other one, where it says this one will be specific to retaining multilingual clinicians across the city, including Spanish language clinicians in East Boston.
And then the third one was just a generic 250 dollars, and it says a previous city council amendment.
So specific to the expanded grant.
Because I spoke with Emily Shea, I spoke with Megan over at the Golden Age when they first received the letter.
So just to want to have clarification on that, please.
Yeah, the expanding engagement grant is fully restored, including Chinatown and the Golden Age grant in Chinatown, and the uh the the Spanish language services has been stationed in East Boston, because it's a has been.
No, I see that then we can so that was a there was a call from uh you know to have that restored also.
No, that's right just making sure because it does specifically say West Roxbury, so making sure that others are receiving it.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Murphy.
Would anyone else wish to speak?
We will now move to uh the final vote.
Mr.
Clerk, will you please call call a roll call vote on Docket 0733?
Councillor Braden, yes, Councillor Braden, yes.
Councillor Coletta's a part of Councillor Colorado's a party, yes, Councillor Culpepper.
Yes, Councillor Culpepper, yes, Councillor Durkin.
Yes.
Councillor Durkin, yes, Councillor Fitzgerald.
Yes.
Councillor Show, yes, Council Flynn.
Councillor Flynn, yes, Councillor Lujan.
Yes.
Councillor Lujan, yes, Councillor Mejia.
Councillor Mejia, no, Councillor Murphy, Councillor Murphy, yes, Councillor Penn.
Councillor Penn, yes, Councillor St.
Anna.
Councillor Saint Hannah, yes.
Councillor Weber.
Yes.
Councillor Weber, yes, and Councillor Warrell.
Yes.
Councillor Warrell, yes.
Docker number 0733 has received eleven, I mean, 12 votes in the affirmative and one negative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Docket 0733 has passed in an amended draft as further amended.
Thank you.
Guess what we have to do now?
We're on to our regular meeting.
We are now on to motions, orders, and resolutions.
Okay.
We're on to the thank you, Councillor.
Um it's given the lateness of the day.
I um Councillor Culpepper, you um, please uh you have the floor.
Madam President, I move the table and move to adjourn for tonight.
No, no, hold on a minute.
We have got some business that we need to attend to tonight.
We can't just adjourn and go home.
We have things to do that are we have late files that are personal personnel orders.
Um wait sorry, can I amend the yes?
Thank you, Councillor Culpepper.
I appreciate your concern.
It is very it is getting late, but we've been here longer than this.
Uh Councillor Durkin.
Um can we can I amend the motion to um to table 1186 through 1191 and then 1193 through 1196 and um and and I uh uh and add in I think that we should vote on the 17F matter um and then move to personnel and late files and green sheets.
Do we have a second?
No, madam chair.
Can you repeat what she said?
I can repeat it.
She admitted the motion.
Hold on, councillor.
It's it's very late.
It's not very late.
It's only quarter to nine.
We have been here to quarter to one, so it's early.
Um given the the the length of deliberation and the long day that we've had, there is a motion on the floor that we uh table some of these dockets uh that we will bring them back on another date.
Um there's a suggestion that we uh we vote um to pass the uh the 17F uh and then that we could move on to deal with the uh pressing issues of some of the the late files.
We have uh a bundle of late files.
Uh it's it's coming up to the end of the financial year, and we have to we have to pass late files at this moment.
So um uh so councillor mehia and no councillor sorry, beg your pardon, your name's councillor Durkin.
Um Councillor Durkin has a motion to uh it's Councillor Colpepper's motion.
Councillor Durkin's no Councillor Culpepper's motion and councillor Durkin seconds it point of order.
Amending your motion.
Uh hold on a minute.
Um counselor Murphy.
So just to clarify what Councillor Flynn was asking, he was well aware what happened, but um Councillor Durkin, you spoke too quick, at least for myself, and we just want to know exactly.
So if you could, because I'm trying to circle and see if I agree with all of them, and I may want to add one or two more, or so if you could start at the beginning, and we could see because we understood what was happening, but we're not just sure which number she was saying.
Thank you.
Uh thank you, Councillor Murphy, for that suggestion.
Um Councillor Durkin, would you mind repeating?
Uh your your uh counselor Culpepper has made a motion, and you are offering a friendly amendment, a friendly amendment to counselor Culpepper's motion motion.
So please continue.
So um under motion orders and resolutions, um, those are dockets 1186 through one.
Sorry, page nine of the agenda.
Page nine of the agenda.
So um, so dockets 1186 through 1196.
Um, which are all of the motions orders and resolutions, except for the 117F, which is 1192.
I think that we should vote on 1192 and the rest should be tabled.
All right, so if I want to so we'll the I I was I was just yeah, I was just saying motion orders and resolutions.
Councilor Mejia, you have the floor.
No, I understand that.
Thank you, madam president.
So we've been asked to do our jobs, and it's almost like nine o'clock, and we're already done for the day when we still have business to do.
Like, I can't believe that that's the call to action right now.
We've been asked to do our jobs, and now we're trying to end the meeting, so we won't do it.
I understand that we've been here all day.
I'm a single mom.
Like, it is not easy being away from my family all day either, but at the end of the day, we can't pick and choose when we want to show up for work.
So we walked in here knowing that it was going to be a long day, and if the narrative is is that we're not doing our jobs and that you know we're not showing up, and then would not thank you, Council Mahia.
Thank you.
Take your point taken.
So there is a motion on the floor and a friendly amendment.
Um let me see.
Um second, can we, Mr.
Clerk?
Can you guide me on this?
We do we take a vote to accept the um motion on the floor, and then we have a proper vote to pass it.
So the first movement is to uh take a vote to um accept councillor Cold Pepper's uh motion and counselor Durkin's friendly amendment.
Uh and a yes would be to say yes.
We will somebody's gonna give me the correct language here.
Oh, yes, we've we've accepted the friendly amendment, so we don't need to vote on it.
So we go straight to a vote on the motion, Mr.
Clerk.
Could you please um take a roll call vote on the motion to uh table uh the dockets one one eight six through one one nine six with the exception of one one nine one, which is uh no one one nine two which is the uh seventeen, is everyone clear?
So a yes is that we will um we will remove we'll table these dockets until the next meeting.
Councillor Braden, yes, Councillor Braden, yes, Councillor Cullow's appointment.
Councillor Culpepper, yes, Councilor Culpepper, yes, Councillor Durkin, yes, Councillor Durkin, yes, Councillor Fitzgerald, Council Fitzgerald, yes, Counselor Flynn, yes, Councillor Flynn, yes, Councillor Louis Gen.
Yes, Councilor, yes, Councillor Majia.
Councillor McHean, no, Councillor Murphy, Councillor Murphy, yes, Councillor Penn.
Yes, Council Penn, yes, Councillor Santana, Councillor Santana, yes, Councillor Weber, yes, Councillor Weber, yes, Councilor Warrell.
10 votes in the affirmative and one no.
Thank you.
Uh the motion to table dockets 1186 through one one nine six, with the exception of 1191 has passed.
119, sorry, I've marked the wrong one.
1192.
I've I've highlighted the wrong docket there, beg your pardon.
So uh we're now on to the uh councillor counselor Flynn.
Counselor, sorry, just to clarify a question.
Last week when I filed the motion to postpone the vote, and we also voted and approved that we added next week's meeting on the 17th.
I think given that we were um given that we were planning to um we will next week's meeting is solely for the purpose of accepting accepting back the mayorish measurement.
No, no, we can we can table these to the full meeting on the twenty-fourth.
Well, could you clarify what is happening if we just voted to bump it to the twenty-fourth or if we voted to bump it to the seventeenth?
Just give me a moment to clarify.
Thank you.
We're back in session.
Thank you, Councillor Murphy, for asking requesting that clarification.
I think the intent is to table these dockets to our next regular meeting, which is uh June 26th.
24th.
Sorry, this is what happens when I get down.
June 24th.
That's for the vote.
Then so we would you in in you would file any further new filings would go would be filed for for Wednesday the 24th.
And the next batch of personnel orders would be filed for June 24th.
And that's the last personnel filing uh opportunity uh for the for the uh financial year.
So um we're at a vote.
Uh yes.
Um the chair councillor Flynn, you you have a uh count Mr.
Clerk, could you please read uh docket 1192 into the record?
Docket number one one nine-two, council Flynn offer the following order requesting certain information under section 17F relative to the number of units and affordable units approved in the city of Boston over the last 10 years by neighborhood and city council districts.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Chair recognizes Councillor Flynn, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
General information I filed the 17F seeking data on housing units approved in Boston over the past 10 years.
Um I think it's important to evaluate the data and information.
I am seeking not only the number of total housing units in the and affordable housing units approved each year, but I also requested that these units that were approved be broken down annually by both the neighborhood in Boston and by the city council district of where the approved products are located.
This data is important and relevant to evaluate as part of our housing crisis.
Um I'm still waiting for outstanding um data for on a 17F as it relates to the Ruth Barkley uh BHA elevator situation that's been several months.
Um for some reason the BHA administer is not providing that information to me, and I need to do my due diligence to ensure my constituents living in public housing are treated with respect and dignity and they live in a safe environment.
And they're currently not living in a safe environment when the elevator system is broken down.
Uh Minister Bach is not providing that information.
And um, I want to ask if uh you can help me get that from Minister Bach because for some reason she is not providing it to us.
We'll certainly look into that, thank you.
So this is 17F Councillor Flynn seeks suspension of the rules and passage of docket one one nine two.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
Councillor uh Councilor Murphy.
Yes, thank you.
On the quick um just wanted just to just as a um this is the 17F, you it's usually just the leads for the the person who's a sponsor.
I just want to also advocate that we still have 11 outstanding 17 Fs that are passed due.
Thank you.
Julie noted.
Councillor Flynn seeks suspension of the rules and passage of docket 1192.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed to aye.
Mr.
Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 1192?
Councillor Braden.
Yes, Council Braden, yes, Councillor Coletta's a part of Councillor Culpeffer.
Councillor Calpefer, yes, Councillor Durkin.
Councillor Durkin, yes, Councillor Fitzgerald.
Yes, Council Fitzgerald, yes, Councillor Flynn.
Councilor Flynn, yes, Council Lou Jen.
Yes.
Councilor Jen, yes, Councillor Mejia, Councillor Murphy.
Councillor Murphy, yes, Councillor Papen.
Councilor Penn, yes, Councillor Santana.
Councillor Santana, yes, Councillor Weber.
Yes.
Councillor Webber, yes, and Councillor Warell.
Ten votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
Docket 1192 has passed.
We're now on to.
Does anyone wish to pull anything from the green sheets?
Okay.
We're now on to late files.
Mr.
Clerk, do we have personnel?
We have 10 personnel orders.
I've been informed by the clerk that there are 10 uh late files, which include 10 uh late files.
Absent objection, these late file matters will be added.
Mr.
Clerk, would you please read the late file matters into the record?
Firstly, file mill councillor Brain for Councillor Mejia.
Secondly, file matter, Councillor Braden for City Council staff.
Third late final matter, Councillor Braden for Councillor Orrell.
Fourth, late fire matter, Councillor Braden for Office Staff.
Fifth, late fire matter, Councillor Brain for Councillor Penn.
Sixth late fire matter, Counselor Brain from Councillor Culpeper.
Seventh, Lake Fire Matter, Councillor Brain for Councillor Santana.
Eighth, eighth file, late matter.
Councillor Braden for Councillor Culpepper.
Ninth, late fire matter, Councillor Brain for Councillor Durkin.
And tenth, late file matter, Councillor Braden for Councillor Lugen.
Thank you, Mr.
Clerk.
The chair moves for passage of this these late file matters.
All in favor say aye.
All opposed say nay.
The ayes have it.
Thank you.
These late file matters have passed.
We're now on to moving on to the consent agenda.
I've been informed by the clerk that there are no additions to the consent agenda.
The question now comes on approval of the various matters contained within the consent agenda.
All those in favor say aye.
Thank you.
Consent agenda has been approved.
We are now on to announcements.
Please remember that these are for upcoming dates and events.
Does anyone have any announcements?
Would you like on if you've got any announcements?
Um I uh want to wish we all want to wish happy birthday to Elsa Flores of Councillor Mejia's office, Tariq Myers of Councillor Culpepper's office, Sidney Scanlon of Councillor Flynn's office, Timothy Guimond, and Stephen Clark and Angelo Yard of Councillor Warrell's office.
Wow, everybody in that office is having a birthday.
Eddie Conley of Councillor Pepin's office, and our very own Michelle Gold Goldberg.
Your birthday.
Is it your birthday today?
Oh good.
Glad um any additionals?
Uh, the chair recognizes Councillor Durkin and then Councillor Colpin.
Her memorials.
Okay, thank you.
Let's just settle.
I'll get myself set centered here.
Now moving on to memorials.
Would anyone like to uplift a name?
Um chair recognizes Councillor Durkin.
You have the floor.
Thank you so much, Chair.
And I know it's been a long meeting, but um Mildred Millie Driscoll, who is the um the mom of um our beloved uh police captain, A1 Captain Driscoll, uh passed away last week, and so just wanted to read her name into the record.
She's a paraprofessional with the Boston Public Schools.
Um and uh it's it's really sad that she is gone, and I know that she means so much to her family and to our uh wonderful Captain Driscoll.
So thank you.
Chair recognizes Councillor Culpepper, you have for the council announcement this Sunday, 3 o'clock, 30 years celebrating.
Thank you.
For those that do want to come, let me know if you're gonna come so we can make sure that you have special seating.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Anyone else?
Um, something I have um councillor Flynn, you have the floor.
I just heard of a um recent death as a friend of mine.
Um his mother passed away, but my friend's name is Tim McDonough of Dorchester, and just want to, um, in the wake was the wake was tonight in Dorchester.
Tim was a pro Tim was is a probation officer.
His mother passed away, but I just want to say condolences to the McDonough family, to Mrs.
McDonough.
We're praying for you.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
I'd like to uplift the memory of William Billy Michael Sullivan Senior, who is the father of Jake Sullivan, who is at BU.
We send our condolences to his family.
Anyone else?
Not missed anyone.
On behalf of Councillor Fitzgerald, William Sullivan.
On behalf of Councillor Flynn, Helene L.
Betsy McDonough, on behalf of Councillor Louis Jeanne, Richard Sullivan, on behalf of Councillor Durkin, Mildred Millie Driscoll, on behalf of uh Liz Councillor Braden and the Council staff, uh William Billy William Sullivan Senior.
The chair moves that when the council adjourns today, it does so in memory of the aforementioned individuals.
A moment of silence, please.
The council is scheduled to meet again in the Ionella chamber on Wednesday, June 17th, 2026 at 10 a.m.
Thank you to my colleagues, central staff, the clerk, the clerk's office, and the council stenographer.
Um, and special shout out to uh Karishma and Ryan and the folks who helped with the budget.
All in favor of adjournment, please say aye.
This council meeting is adjourned.
Boston City Council Regular Meeting - June 10, 2026
The Boston City Council held a regular meeting on June 10, 2026, at 12:00 PM in the Christopher Iannella Chamber. The meeting included two presentations celebrating Pride Month and recognizing June 19, 2026, as Napoleon Jones-Henderson Day, followed by approval of several consent agenda items, committee reports, and a lengthy debate on the Fiscal Year 2027 budget. The council passed a $8.1 million amendment package to restore funding for housing vouchers, senior services, youth jobs, arts, and other programs, and approved the FY2027 budget as amended.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the June 3, 2026 meeting were approved unanimously.
- Consent Agenda Resolutions: The council approved a consent agenda containing 15 resolutions recognizing individuals and events, including Glenway Musicians, Dorchester Day Award winners, and several centenarians.
Presentations
- Pride Month Celebration: Councilor Santana led a presentation featuring speakers Christian Gardet (artist and mental health specialist), Tina Jushi Caruso (artist and advocate), and a third speaker who emphasized the need for sustained support for LGBTQ+ communities, including restoring funding to the Office of LGBTQIA+ Advancement.
- Napoleon Jones-Henderson Day: Councilor Mejia presented a resolution declaring June 19, 2026, as Napoleon Jones-Henderson Day, honoring the late artist and mentor who helped bring Juneteenth celebrations to Boston. Akua Holmes spoke about his legacy.
Communications from the Mayor
- Docket 1181: A $1,000,000 Cummings Community Safety Grant from the Cummings Foundation to support community safety, public health, community events, and youth engagement initiatives. Passed unanimously (12-0).
- Docket 1182: A $3,220 MassAbility/Rehabilitation Commission grant to fund employment and training assistance for disabled individuals at Boston's MassHire Career Centers. Passed unanimously (12-0).
Reports of Public Officers and Others
- Dockets 1183-1185: Placed on file, including a notice of Mayoral actions, election results for the Boston Retirement Board, and a communication from Councilor Flynn regarding elevator failure protocol at BHA developments.
Reports of Committees
- Appointments to Landmarks and Historic District Commissions (Dockets 0796-0800, 1037-1040): The council confirmed eight appointments and reappointments to the Boston Landmarks Commission, Back Bay Architectural District Commission, and Fort Point Channel Landmark District Commission, following a committee hearing on June 5, 2026. All passed with 11-0 or 12-0 votes.
- Revolving Fund Limits (Dockets 0741-0754): The council approved 14 revolving fund limits for FY2027, covering Boston Public Schools facilities, transportation, technology, environmental conservation, energy, BERDO, BCYF child care, Law Department property repairs, Police Department fitness center and K-9 training, Arts & Culture public art and Strand Theatre, Tourism, and the Transportation Department bikeshare program. All passed unanimously with roll call votes ranging from 11-0 to 12-0.
Discussion Items: FY2027 Budget (Docket 0733)
- The council debated the FY2027 operating budget, which grew by 2.1% (the slowest since the Great Recession). Councilor Weber, Chair of Ways and Means, introduced a substituted committee report totaling $8.1 million in amendments, restoring cuts to housing vouchers ($2 million), senior programming ($1.2 million), youth jobs ($750,000), Black Male Advancement ($555,000), LGBTQ+ Advancement ($200,000), Women's Advancement ($100,000), arts and culture ($600,000), small businesses ($600,000), food access ($400,000), returning citizens ($750,000), and other programs.
- Amendments Considered:
- Councilor Coletta Zapata moved to restore $1.2 million for the Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement but withdrew the motion after discussion.
- Councilor Fitzgerald offered a $1.4 million amendment (funded by cuts to Boston Transportation Department personnel) to support the coordinated response team, age-strong grants, food justice, EMS health and wellness, legacy business awards, MWBE procurement readiness, youth jobs, arts and culture, human rights commission, veterans, and fair housing testing. Passed 10-3.
- Councilor Fitzgerald offered a second amendment restoring $140,000 for MOIA ESOL and miscellaneous grants from various department cuts. Passed 12-0.
- Councilor Flynn offered three amendments (total $1.5 million) funded by cuts to Neighborhood Services for BPD crime lab equipment, BPD health and wellness, and firefighter cancer screening. All three were defeated (2-10 or 2-9).
- Councilor Mejia offered three amendments (total $3.08 million) funded by cuts to BPD personnel and housing services for food justice, housing, arts, veterans, and youth jobs. All three were defeated (3-9 or 4-9).
- Councilor Culpepper offered an amendment ($200,000) funded by BTD contractual services for PFAS-free turnout gear for firefighters. Defeated 5-7.
- After debate, the council passed the amended budget (Docket 0733) by a vote of 12-1, with Councilor Mejia voting no. The final budget includes the Fitzgerald amendments and the original chair's package.
Motions, Orders, and Resolutions
- Dockets 1186-1196 (except 1192): Tabled to the next regular meeting on June 24, 2026, by a 10-1 vote (Councilor Mejia opposed).
- Docket 1192 (17F Order): Councilor Flynn's order requesting data on housing units and affordable units approved over the last ten years by neighborhood and council district passed unanimously (10-0).
Late Files and Consent Agenda
- Late Files: Ten personnel orders were added and passed unanimously.
- Consent Agenda: The previously listed 15 resolutions were approved.
Adjournment
- The council adjourned in memory of several individuals: Mildred "Millie" Driscoll, William "Billy" Michael Sullivan Sr., Helene L. "Betsy" McDonough, and Richard Sullivan. The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, June 17, 2026, at 10:00 AM.
Key Outcomes
- Approved $1,003,220 in grants (Cummings Community Safety Grant and MassAbility grant).
- Confirmed eight appointments to historic and landmarks commissions.
- Approved 14 revolving fund limits for FY2027.
- Passed the FY2027 operating budget ($4.9 billion) with $8.1 million in amendments, restoring funding for housing, seniors, youth, arts, small businesses, and equity offices.
- Passed a 17F order for housing data.
- Adjourned in memory of four individuals.
Meeting Transcript
Colleagues and those in attendance to please silence their cell phones and electronic devices. Also pursuant to Rule 42, I remind all in this chamber that no demonstration of approval or disapproval from members of the public will be permitted, including but not limited to signs, placards, banners, cheering, clapping, booing, etc. And if such demonstrations are made, the gallery or public seating area will be cleared. This rule will be strictly enforced. Mr. Clerk, could you please call the role to ascertain the presence of a quorum? Councillor Braden. Here. Councillor Colletta's a father. Councilor Culpepper. Councilor Durkin. Councilor Fitzgerald. Councillor Flynn. Council Luigian. Councilor Mejia, Councillor Murphy, Councilor Pepin. Councilor St. Anna. Counselor Weber. And Council World. Thank you, Mr. Clerk. I've been informed by the clerk that a quorum is present. Mr. Clerk, would you do us the honor of offering an invocation for us today? And following that, we will cite uh the Pledge of Allegiance. Thank you, Council. Good morning, everyone. Please stand. Let us pray. Somewhere at our innermost core, each of us wants to submerge self-interest so that we may do that which is right. To promulgate justice tempered by mercy. But this is not always an easy path for human, all too fallible men and women. Knowing this, we ask today for patience that we may diligently weigh conflicting evidence and find the right therein. We ask for tolerance, that we may truly hear and consider opinions unlike our own. We ask for wisdom that we may recognize the face of truth when it appears before us. All this we ask in the name of that eternal creative spirit, that supreme power that guides us all, whatever our traditions to act in ways that are loving, wise, and just so be it forever and ever days without end. Amen. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, to the Republic for which is one nation under God, indivisible within the injustice. Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Um we have two presentations today. So first I will call up uh Councillor Santana. Uh, if what for your presentation, you've got five minutes, and then follow that we have Councilor Mejia. Good afternoon. Happy pride, everyone. Um I would like to be able to thank you, Madam President, for this opportunity. I would like to call up some of the speakers that I'm uh I'll be having today. Um Christian, Tina, and Ricardo, if they can come up. Um, and we'll be hearing from them. Um happy pride, everyone.
openpublica.com