My name is Priscilla Rojas and I am the chair of the BPA board.

Thank you for joining the June eighteenth, twenty twenty-six Economic Development and Industrial Corporation of Boston board meeting.

At this time, the Boston Planning and Development Agency is hosting public meetings in a hybrid setting for the health, safety, and accessibility of Boston residents.

Hybrid means that our board meetings are conducted in person at City Hall in our boardroom on the ninth floor and virtually via Zoom and Boston City TV.

For more information and updates, visit BostonPlans.gov slash cable.

Here, Mr.

Shepard.

Here, and I think I, the chair, am present.

Item number one, request authorization for the approval of the minutes of the May 14th, 2026 board meeting.

A motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor.

Aye.

The opposed.

The ayes have it.

Motion passes.

Item number two, request authorization to execute a memorandum of agreement with the City of Boston acting by and through its property management department to formalize the assignment of municipal protective services personnel on EDIC managed properties, including the Raymond Alflyn Marine Park and 43 Hawkins Street for a period of one year commencing July 1st, 2026 and ending on June 30th, 2027, with three one-year term renewal options and at a cost not to exceed $950,000 for fiscal year 27.

Rebecca.

Thank you, Madam Chair and members of the board.

The City of Boston's property management's municipal protective services has provided security services to the BPDA for many years.

These uniformed officers preserve order, respond to critical events, and enforce the laws of the Commonwealth and the ordinances of the City of Boston.

Their responsibilities on BPDA property include, but are not limited to provide uniformed officers for physical security, emergency response, and traffic control, provide real-time video surveillance, provide alarm monitoring and system maintenance, and provide lease and license enforcement.

By entering into the MOA with the City of Boston, acting through its property management department, the EDIC will ensure that 12 Channel, 43 Hawkins, and other EDIC properties maintain a consistent and visible presence throughout for visitors, employees, contractors, and tenants.

Further, the MOA will provide the necessary documentation to allow for reimbursement to the city of Boston for the provision of NPS services.

The term of the PROS and MOA is for one year beginning in July and ending June 30th, 2027, with three additional one-year option or one-year option terms.

The MOA will cover fiscal year 2027, and the total cost for MPS services for the EDIC properties is expected to be approximately 950,000.

Thank you, and I'm happy to answer any questions.

Okay, thank you.

Any questions or comments from the board?

Hearing and seeing none of motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor, aye.

Opposed.

The ayes have it.

Motion passes.

Item number three, request authorization to execute a memorandum of agreement with the city of Boston, acting by and through its public or its department of public works, authorizing the use of and payment for fuel fuel and services provided by the fleet maintenance unit for the period from July 1st, 2026 through June 30th, 2027, at a cost not to exceed 250,000.

Rebecca.

Thank you.

The City of Boston Department of Public Works owns and operates a fleet maintenance unit, which provides fuel and various vehicle services for city-owned vehicles.

To achieve efficiency and decrease costs and expenses, DPW has agreed to provide the BPDA with fleet maintenance unit services.

Services under the fleet maintenance unit will be provided to all entities under the BPDA, including BRA, EDIC, and OWD.

In total, the BPDA has a total of 21 vehicles in our fleet.

Service under the fleet maintenance units includes fuel fob services, emergency breakdown support, inspections, washing, and other services.

The applicable rates for these services will be specified in an MOA between public works and BPDA.

The MOA is proposed for fiscal year 27.

The total cost of services authorized for all BPDA entities under this MOA shall not exceed 250,000.

Historically, annual spending is typically less than $50,000, though.

Thank you, and I'm happy to answer any questions.

Thank you.

Any questions or comments from the board?

Hearing and saying none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor.

Aye.

Opposed.

The ayes have it.

Motion passes.

Thank you, Rebecca.

Item number four, request authorization to extend tenative designation status to and to, and continue lease negotiations with a joint venture between Lincoln Property Company and Quaker Lane Capital, or a related entity of such joint venture for the long-term lease and redevelopment of the EDIC owned parcel U site located at 7th Channel Street within the Raymond Elflyn Marine Park for six months until December 31st, 2026.

Ben.

Thank you, Madam Chair and members of the board.

Seven Channel Street, also known as Parcel U, is located in the Raymond Al Flynn Marine Park.

The approximately 45,000 square foot site includes a two-story building of approximately 27 square, 27,000 square foot feet, and it's been vacant for several years.

Lincoln Property Company and Quaker Lane Capital, the 2023 selected proponent, proposed an approximately two hundred and forty thousand square foot nine-floor building with office and lab space.

The proposed building will include a two-floor firehouse on the first and second floor.

Since the initial uh tenant designation award, Lincoln slash Quaker Lane have been in active negotiations with BPDA staff on the terms of the ground lease for the redevelopment of the site, and we are close to finalizing a term sheet with this team.

They have filed their letter of intent in April, and the next step is for them to start working on their PNF.

Staff acknowledge that the current market is challenging, but we are hopeful based on the progress of the term sheet and the submission of a letter of intent on the project moving forward.

Therefore, we recommend extending tenant of the designation for six months to allow this to move forward.

Um thank you.

I'm happy to answer any questions.

Thanks, Ben.

Any questions or comments from the board?

Okay, hearing and saying none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor, aye.

Opposed, the ayes have it.

Motion passes.

Item number five.

Request authorization to execute a contract with McKay Construction Services Incorporated for the construction of the Fid Kennedy Avenue Realignment with the Raymond Alflyn Marine Park and an amount of $3,758,680, and a 20% contingency for a total contract amount not to exceed $4,520,416.

Rebecca, thank you.

I'm before you today to request authorization to award and execute a construction contract with McKay Construction Services for the realignment of Fid Kennedy within the Raymond Del Flynn Marine Park.

This matter was last before you in December 2025 to request authorization to publicly advertise and issue an invitation for bid.

The Marine Park Master Plan Update identified Fid Kennedy Avenue as a preferred primary trekking route within the campus in order to improve circulation, support future development opportunities, and separate heavy truck traffic from multimodal transportation routes to improve overall site safety.

BPDA previously retained engineering services to evaluate conceptual roadway realignment alternatives, which resulted in four concepts being reviewed with the Marine Park industrial tenants.

One preferred option was selected for advancement into final design and construction.

The scope of work for this project includes construction of new paved roadway sections, sidewalks, curbing, landscaping, utility relocation work, and storm drainage infrastructure associated with the realignment of the road.

The project also includes relocation and installation of electrical, water, and storm drain utilities, relocation of the marine park sign, relocation of security equipment, and associated line striping improvements.

Two bids were received in response to the solicitation.

The lowest eligible and responsible bidder was McKay and the amount of $3,758,680.

BPDA staff reviewed the submitted bids and determined that McKay Construction was the lowest eligible and qualified bidder in accordance with mass general law chapter 3039M.

The total contract award is $4,520,416, which includes a recommended contingency of 20%.

Funding for this work is included in the agency's fiscal year 26 Capo Construction Budget with funding support from the City of Boston Capital Plan.

Therefore, we are requesting authorization for the director to award and execute this construction contract with McKay construction services.

Thank you, and I'm happy to answer any questions.

Okay, thank you.

Any questions or comments from the board?

All right, hearing and saying none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor.

Opposed.

The ayes have it.

Motion passes.

Thanks, Rebecca.

Item number six requests authorization to execute a contract with Northeastern Tree Services Incorporated for Arbor services at EDIC owned properties citywide for a period of three years with two one-year term renewal options and a total contract amount not to exceed 296,900.

Francis.

Good afternoon, members of the board and Director Shen.

I'm here to present the awarded bid for Arbor services for EDI owned EDIC owned properties within the Raymond L.

Flynn Marine Park.

The selected Arborist Company will be responsible for furnishing all supervision labor, materials, equipment, transportation, and related services necessary for tree trimming and pruning, removal of hazardous trees, stump cutting, and tree plantings.

All services shall be performed by a Massachusetts certified arborist.

In the response for the IFB issued on April 23rd, 20 26, the BPDA received and opened two responses on May 12th, 2026.

Of the two proposals submitted, Northeastern Tree Services Inc.

was selected as the responsive and responsive and eligible bidder with the lowest bid price of 178,140 for the initial three-year contract.

The result contract will be for the initial three-year term and up to 296,900 if both one year extension options are exercised.

The contract will be funded for the BPDA fiscal year 26 operating budget.

Happy to answer any questions.

Okay.

Any questions or comments from the board?

All right, hearing and saying none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor.

Aye opposed.

The ayes have it.

Motion passed.

Thanks, Francis.

Item number seven, request authorization to execute a contract with building pathways to prepare students with career readiness, occupational skills, and wraparound support in order to enter and be successful in the registered union apprenticeship in the building trades for a period of two years with one-year term.

Renewal option and a total contract amount of $388,000.

Jody.

Thank you.

Good afternoon.

I'm Jody Sugarman Rosan, a deputy chief in Boston's worker empowerment cabinet, and I'm here today to request authorization to enter into a contract with building pathways for a total contract amount of 388,000 over a two-year term with a one-year renewal option to be exercised at the sole discretion of the Office of Workforce Development.

On December 3rd, the Worker Empowerment Cabinet released a new report, the Boston Climate Ready Workforce Action Plan.

According to the report, between now and 2050, efforts to design, build, and operate a clean energy economy and to ensure Boston's climate resiliency will keep about 67,000 people per year employed.

About 10% of these jobs will be net new jobs that wouldn't exist otherwise.

Just over 50% of these jobs will be in the building trades.

Over the next 25 years, the city and property owners will need to invest between 12 and 21 billion in new coastal and nature-based investments to prevent flooding, controlled stormwater, and build coastal resilience.

About 8800 to 15,000 jobs will be supported by these investments per year, including workers to install and maintain resilience infrastructure.

At the January 15th board meeting, the Office of Workforce Development requested and received the board's authorization to issue a publicly advertised request for proposals for a contractor to provide a training program to support the Boston Climate Jobs Alliance to provide career readiness, occupational skills, and wraparound support in order to enter and be successful and a registered union apprenticeship in the building trades.

That RFP was issued on March 26th, and one firm submitted a proposal in response to the RFP.

After review of the technical and fee proposals received, OWD now seeks approval to select the recommended vendor.

OWD recommends building pathways as the contractor to prepare students with career readiness, occupational skills, and wraparound support in order to enter and be successful in registered union apprenticeship programs in the building trades to support the Boston Climate Jobs Alliance.

Building Pathways proposal described a clear and comprehensive plan that addresses and complies with all core elements of the required submissions stated in the RP and demonstrates a complete understanding of the key issues and objectives.

The proposal clearly summarizes the team's understanding of the project goals and deliverables and how its approach experience relate and relationships would successfully achieve these goals.

Thank you for the opportunity to present this request.

Okay, thank you.

Uh questions or comments from the board.

Just a quick comment.

Um it's great to see us invest in our secession plan as people are retiring and leaving the industry.

We definitely need to replenish the industry, so it's good to see, and I just hope these classes are filled and I hope we can get good advertisement out to make sure young men and women, men and women and the communities take advantage of the opportunity.

So thank you.

Thank you.

Yeah.

How do you, you know, what is the advertising kind of plan?

How do people become aware of you know your programming and things like that?

The Boston Climate Jobs Alliance actually has a partner specifically dedicated to outreach.

Um so we have a new website and we have um social media graphics that drive people to the training programs.

We also have a partner, the American Cities Coalition that is providing career exploration opportunities for people to come, hear more about what climate jobs are available and find the right pathway for them.

And we always share information that the building trades is a very big part of climate jobs.

Awesome.

Great.

All right.

Any other questions or comments?

Hearing and saying none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor, aye, opposed.

The ayes have it.

Motion passes.

Thanks, Jody.

Thank you so much.

Right.

Item number eight: request approval of the fiscal year 2027 operating budget of the Economic Development and Industrial Corporation, the EDIC, and the expense amount of $55,803,603 and approval for the fiscal year 2027 capital expenditures amount of $7,025,000 and approval of the transfer funds for givenness of interagency debt and leasing property and assets between the economic and industrial corporation of Boston and the Boston Redevelopment Authority, the Boston Local Development Corporation, and the Boston Industrial Development Finance Authority.

Approval to enter into any interagency sub-lease for space, sublease amendments or extensions, and authorization to take actions and execute documents and agreements related to the transfer in and expenditure or transfer of funds out of the Capital Reserve Fund and approval to execute any and all notices, correspondence, documents, or agreements to or with employees and other as the director determines to be in the best interest of the EDIC.

Michelle.

Thank you.

Good afternoon, Madam Chair, members of the board, Director Shen.

My name is Michelle Goldberg.

I am the director of finance, and I'm happy to present fiscal 2027's budget to you.

Before I jump in, I want to recognize the incredible work of the finance department and thank everyone across the organization that engaged in the budget development process.

Thank you for your hard work all year long to ensure we are strong fiscal stewards.

As a reminder, this board has already reviewed and approved a large portion of the agency's operations by approving the funding for the city planning department.

That approval ensures that staff have the resources they need to support this board while operating within the city structure.

Today's vote completes the BPDA's budget process by factoring in revenues generated by EDIC and BRA assets and expenses related to the operations and maintenance of the real estate within the BPDA portfolio.

The following presentation will cover the BRA and EDIC budget.

At the conclusion of my presentation, I will seek a vote for the EDIC portion, and later tonight I will return for the BRA portion.

We can move to the next slide.

Please, thank you.

The annual budget process begins with a mid-year review of current activities and anticipated needs.

We now work with the city very closely to ensure personnel and contractual expenses are considered concurrently.

BPDA staff collaborate internally to project revenue and assess our capital needs in an effort to bring a complete BPDA budget to you for a vote.

With that, we can take a look at the current year's performance and our end of year projections.

FY26 revenue came in very close to budget with a small favorable variance showing our showing in our grants for OWD.

We no longer need to prepare as many intercompany grants between BRA and EDIC as we did in the past because major expenditures like payroll and large contract payments are cash flowed by the financial transfer to the city.

Instead, this grant income category now carries funding from the city for capital, which I will get into more later.

For now, it's important to note that the BPDA is experiencing the same economic pressures felt throughout the economy.

We are very fortunate to have so many so much of our revenue locked into long-term lease agreements.

The expense side is where you will clearly see the impact of moving a major expense to the city under a contractual MOA agreement.

Personnel and benefits now reflect the remaining staff, and those costs will, of course, increase over time.

Given the small pool, we obtain uh benefits for the remaining staff through the city.

We can move to the next slide for the FY27 budget.

And sorry, one more slide there.

Uh yes, there you go.

Thank you.

As you can see, um, FY27 budgeted revenue is expected to increase modestly.

We do have scheduled increases across our lease portfolios.

Um, our parking revenue remains strong as our tenants continue to lease spacing in addition in addition to retail um parking.

Um equity participation is fairly stable as we see that the economy um is slowing a bit, um, and we are still receiving some other income from our investments.

As we go down the personnel line, you will see that uh costs to the city department and the core operations, they remain fairly stable as a result of following the city's budget guidance.

The remaining increase reflects the true increase cost for BPDA related to owning and operating our properties.

I want to point out that in that city planning department, the BPDA funds major core equity work.

The BPDA uh the FY27 budget reflects equity-focused investments in a more integrated operational model than ever before.

The agency's approach to advancing diversity and acquest and access, excuse me, has matured greatly since the establishment of the FY21 equity and inclusion fund.

The initial investment in senior level staff and programming are now fully integrated into the city planning department budget.

With this greater integration into the fabric of the operations, we can now simplify the financial oversight and the reporting practices that we had in place, are creating unnecessary administrative complexity.

So, in our financial activities by formal formally winding down the equity fund, we will be able to continue these programs with a more simple funding model.

Next slide, please.

Now we can look, oh sorry, pie charts.

Wouldn't want to forget the pie charts.

Um, this just gives you a sense of the breakout of our expenses and our revenue.

So as we look at our revenue, you can see we still rely very much on our rental and lease agreements.

And if you slip to the next slide, you can see, of course, our planning department, our core operations are the majority of our expenses.

And when you add in the remaining personnel and employee benefits, that's where you see the whole of BPDA's expenses.

Now we can go to the next slide and look at our capital budget.

The BRA continues to invest in our revenue generating assets at China Trade and the Charlestown Navy R for the EDIC.

Crucial investments will be made in 12 channel.

A key revenue generator is in need of repair, as well as Pier 10, where repairs will improve maritime activities across our property.

These investments are part of our larger program, managed by our capital construction team in the real estate department.

Thank you to that entire team for your leadership on this work.

With that, this concludes my presentation.

I will seek the EDIC vote with this agenda and be back later for the BRA.

Happy to answer any questions.

Thank you.

Okay, thank you.

Um any questions or comments from the board?

Yes, thank you, Michelle.

Um, I really appreciate that thorough and transparent uh approach to sharing.

Look forward to the complimentary one uh in the next part of the meeting.

Um random question, and I'm not even sure where we would go with this, but parking revenue is a not insignificant amount of our budget, about 15 million, I believe.

Who sets the price for parking?

Because as someone who tries to bike, tries to take public transit, still occasionally has to park downtown.

The continuum of parking garages in the city of Boston.

Fantastic question.

Wildly uh long.

So I'm curious what my part Rebecca in the real estate department will be able to speak to that at length.

Um, thank you.

Yeah, so we um have a parking management contract currently with Pilgrim and Pro Park.

They work with us very closely to do market analysis, so they understand both within our assets in the marine park and then also in some of our BRA properties, what the market is conducting.

Generally speaking, our um rates are set a little bit below market to be competitive, but they have really the eye on the market and can help us, and then certainly we were balancing a lot of these goals that us as a city have around trying to incentivize other modes of transportation, but this is also revenue generation, so we're trying to set the rates appropriately, but again, with um that market actor that is really helping us understand what is appropriate.

Good.

And have uh follow-up on that.

Have you what was if you don't know it offhand, it's fine, I don't want to put you on the spot, but I would imagine we've seen an increase in this fiscal year as opposed to last fiscal year, as we're a little bit further out from COVID.

More and more people are coming in, more events are back online.

Absolutely, yeah.

And I think one of the nuances of our our parking is that there is both monthly and transient parkers.

So we have seen a slight increase in the revenue that we're collecting on monthlies, um, the because of the rate that we increases that we're including.

I think in a post-COVID world, there's a lot more transient.

People are not buying a monthly pass because they're coming into the office two or three times, and so that's a calculus that we've had to do as well.

And um, I think in terms of the revenue more generally, we do have assets that we have disposed of or are planning to dispose of soon.

And so we want to ensure you know the bunker hill lots that are over in Charlestown, and then also there's another lot in Chinatown.

Those tend to be a little bit less revenue generating, but we are making that revenue trade-off in order to achieve affordable housing development.

Sounds like you are more than on top of it.

So I appreciate that education.

Thank you.

Okay.

Additional questions or comments.

Um, I had a couple.

Just wanted to confirm.

Um, just want to confirm my understanding of the um the changes to the equity, you know, focused programming.

Um, so can you just review that one more of like you know what is changing?

Yes, so in um establishing the equity fund, we weren't prepared from a financial perspective to track or demonstrate where our equity investments were.

So we essentially had to set something up outside of the system in an Excel spreadsheet.

And right, um, and so over time we worked to put the codes in.

So we have a program code, we have a department code, and we actually have the department now.

We've hired a director, all of that is embedded in the work, and so it's it's systemic in the department now, and so it's duplicative.

We can run a report in the system and pull the codes and see what we're putting, and then we also have the spreadsheet.

There could be variances between those.

We don't want to have multiple sources of truth, so we'd like to uh wind down the external fund coding so that we can just rely on the system.

Got it.

So it was just the when yeah, when we initially we just didn't know what the budget or just like what it was gonna be announced.

Exactly.

We weren't sure where we were gonna put the cycle.

Exactly.

We weren't sure if there was gonna be a whole department, if it was going to be spread out, we just we weren't even sure how we were gonna do that.

So over time, as the decisions got made and we built it in, we were able to start to pull and track, and so now it's kind of this extra thing that we're gonna do.

Yeah, so it's more of operational thing, yeah.

So it's not changing programming or investment, it's just the operations.

Right, it's just the accounting process.

The program is there and the funding is in place.

Yeah, um, okay.

Good, good.

Um, let's see what else.

Um, yeah, I just wanted to just to to call out and shout out always um the finance team.

Thank you so much for all your hard work.

Uh, you know, uh presentations are always very clear, the variance is very understandable.

Um, and uh, and also shout out to um the capital team.

Um I've seen that we've been doing that budgeting process come a really long way, and I just feel really great about where we are, like today, and and the decisions that we're making on um, you know uh the mini capital needs that we have, right?

But just um uh I just wanted to check that out.

All right, any other questions or comments?

Hearing and seeing none, a motion is in order.

So I'll move second, right?

All those in favor, aye, opposed, guys.

Have it, motion passes.

Thanks, Michelle.

And item number nine, Mike personnel.

Uh thank you, Madam Chair, members of the board and director Shen.

Uh, we have a number of items for your consideration on the EDIC agenda with the exact details included in the board memos.

Uh we have six contracts in the real estate division, Delaney Morris Landry.

In the administration division, Anthony Varani, Samantha Bidal, and Izzy Wagner, and the Director's Office, Natalie Noble, and uh and the uh Office of General Counsel, Lisa Richardson, and that's it.

Now answer any questions you may have.

Okay, thank you.

Any questions or comments from the board?

Hearing and saying none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor?

Opposed.

The ayes have it.

Motion passes.

Thanks, Mike.

And I now need a motion to adjourn the EDIC meeting.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor?

Okay.

The ayes have it.

Commission passes.

All right.

Let's move on to the next section.

Thank you for joining the June 18th, 2026, Boston Redevelopment Authority board meeting.

At this time, the Boston Planning and Development Agency is hosting public meetings in a hybrid setting for the health, safety, and accessibility of Boston residents.

Hybrid means that our board meetings are conducted in person at City Hall in our boardroom on the ninth floor and virtually via Zoom and Boston City TV at the same time.

For more information and updates, visit BostonPlans.org.

The open public meeting law requires that I notify the public that this meeting is being recorded.

Please be aware that an audio and visual recording of this meeting is being made and broadcast by Boston City TV, which is a part of the City of Boston, Office of Cable Communication at Xfinity Channel 26, RCN Channel 13, and Verizon BIOS Channel 962.

It's also being live streamed at Boston.govslash cable.

If there's anyone in the audience who's recording the meeting, this meeting, I please I ask that you please identify yourself.

Okay, saying none.

And also note that demonstrations of approval or disapproval from members of the public are also not permitted during the meeting.

So we'll start with a uh roll call.

Um, Ms.

Bennett.

Here, Mr.

Shepard.

Present.

Mr.

Malley here.

And the chair is present.

Yes, we have for counselor.

As a list testimony, absolutely.

Welcome, Counselor Flynn.

Floor is yours.

Thank you, Madam Chair, and thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak.

And thank you to the members of the board as well to Director Chen.

And I also want to recognize my longtime friend that recently retired as well, Ted Landsmark.

Um, Madam Chair, may I speak uh briefly on five and six at EDIC and then on 22?

Okay.

Yeah.

Thank you, madam chair.

Madam Chair, in regards to um items five and six on the economic development industrial cooperation agenda located within the Raymond Del Flynn Marine Park.

What item seeks a construction contract for Fit Kennedy realignment, which would make it easier for trucks to access the park.

The bid has been approved by the Marine Industrial Park Association.

The second agenda item would include an arboreist contract ward, which will maintain the urban tree canopy at the Raymond L.

Flynn Marine Industrial Park.

I also have filed or refile, I should say, a hearing audit to continue to call attention to the heat island effect in increasing urban tree canopy in South Boston and especially in Chinatown as well.

But I'm respectfully asking the board to consider uh supporting both of these, number five and six.

Um Madam Chair, may I go on to number 22?

Please.

Okay.

Madam Chair, this one is a I'm speaking on behalf of the um elected officials in my neighborhood, including Congressman Lynch, Senator Nick Collins, and representative um David Beale.

This is in support of 776 Summer Street, which is phase two.

As the elected representatives of South Boston at the federal state city level, we have writing to express our strong support for a phase two design plan and PDA amendment for planned development arena number one two eight Hull Street, station redevelopment at 776 Summer Street, as proposed by the HRP group in it in their partner, Redgate.

Located in South Boston, the 776 redevelopment represents one of the most transformative projects underway in our city.

The project will turn a long vacant form industrial site into a vibrant mixed-use neighborhood that advances Boston's goals for sustainability, economic inclusion, public access to the waterfront.

It prioritize creating significant new housing, including affordable and middle income housing while generating good paying union jobs under a project labor agreement.

The project has been shaped by years of community import and reflects a real commitment to thoughtful planning, resilience against climate change, and sea level rise in opportunities for all.

Approval of phase two design plan and PDA amendment delivers on that commitment.

And it is a critical step toward delivering meaningful housing economic opportunity public amenities for South Boston and for the city.

While no neighborhood concerns regarding on-site affordable housing and other related issues continue to be discussed and examined in future phases of the project.

We respectfully ask the board to vote in favor of the current of this current phase of the proposal at 776.

We thank this board for your continued commitment to advancing projects that strengthen the economic vitality of the city of Boston.

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Great.

Thank you so much, Councillor Flynn.

All right.

Where was I?

Item number one.

Okay.

Request authorization for the approval of the minutes of the May 14, 2026 board meeting.

A motion is in order.

So move.

Second.

All those in favor, I opposed.

The ayes have it.

Item number two, request authorization to enter into a license agreement with Richard and Tali doing business as TNTs for the use of a merchandise kiosk at Long Wharf for a period of nine months, commencing July 1st, 2026 and ending March 31st, 2027.

Samantha.

Good afternoon, Madam Chair, members of the board.

I'm here to request approval under a license with Richard Natalia doing business as TNTTs for approximately 64 square feet of land located on Old Atlantic Avenue in the downtown waterfront urban renewal area of the city of Boston to operate two souvenir merchandise kiosks.

The downtown waterfront area is the most popular tourism destinations in the city of Boston, making it a valuable location for souvenir merchandise vending.

The locations for the downtown waterfront kiosk program are on Boston planning and development agency owned land strategically placed between long and central wharves directly across from legal seafoods at 225 State Street.

The downtown waterfront merchandise vendor kiosk program is an opportunity to support tourism in the city of Boston and creates opportunities for local small business vendors to sell merchandise to the public.

Richard Natalia has operated two waterfront merchandise kiosks on Long Wharf for over 10 tourist seasons.

Staff recommend entering into a license agreement with Richard Nitalia for a nine-month license term, which will commence on July 1, 2026 and end on March 31st, 2027.

Thank you.

I'm happy to answer any questions.

Okay.

Any questions or comments from the board?

Can you just refresh my memory on um kind of how liability works when, you know, with the kiosk and what we're responsible for and what they're responsible for?

Uh yes.

So they're we're just they we just have they they just bring their kiosk and we I get an insurance certificate from them.

So yeah, we're not responsible for their merchandise out there.

Okay, yeah.

Um, all right.

Any other questions or comments?

Okay, hearing and seeing that.

A motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor.

I opposed.

The eyes have it.

Let's give people their t-shirts.

All right, item number three.

Request authorization to enter into a license agreement with ATT for the use of a portion of Sergeant's Wharf parking lot for the placement of portable cellular base station to support emergency management response during major citywide events, including but not unlimited to FIFA and sale 250 events for a period of two months, commencing July 1st, 2026, and ending August 30th, 2026.

Samantha.

Computer request approval to enter a license agreement with ATT for the use of a portion of Sergeant's Wharf parking lot to place one cell on wheels cow to bring additional cellular service to support emergency management response during major citywide events, including but unlimited to FIFA and sale 250 events.

ATT is the third largest wireless carrier in the United States, and they are requesting to use our property to temporarily place a cell on wheels starting July 1, 2026 to August 30th, 2026.

A cow is a portable cellular base station mounted on a trailer or truck that is rapidly deployed to temporarily boost network coverage and data capacity in high density areas areas.

Cows are required at major events to prevent network congestion, ensure public safety emergency response and fill infrastructure gaps.

Sale 250 is a major maritime celebration, marking the 250th anniversary of the United States.

The event will bring tall ships from Boston from July 11 to July 17th, and they will coincide with FIFA related events and draw millions of spectators to the city, putting a strain on existing network coverage and data capacity.

The proposed license will allow ATT to gain access to the license area exclusively for the placement of cell on wheels.

ATT must obtain all permits which may be required in order to in order for the licensee to use the license premise.

The proposed license will allow for a two-month license term, which will commence on July 1 and expire on July 30th.

The proposed license fee shall be 14,400 for the two-month term payable advance increase in monthly increments of 7,200.

VPA staff recommends that the director be authorized to enter into license agreement with ATT for the use and occupancy of a portion of the Sergeant Wharf parking lot for a two-month term.

I'm happy to answer any questions.

Okay, any questions or comments from the board?

I have a brief question, and you may not be able to answer this, but it's totally fine.

Obviously, this is smart supported.

Obviously, in FIFA, just the sheer crowds we've seen, warrants it.

Has there been to your knowledge any issues with sort of communication the last week or so as sort of uh fans of begun, the throngs of people have begun trickling in?

Not that I'm aware of.

Um, and actually, we did a short-term license with ATT to be on the property up until now, and then here for board approval to extend the last two.

Oh, so they have it's doing it, it's happening now.

Yes, it is happening now on a short-term license, and then here to extend it for the next two months to get us through all the events.

Okay, that's great.

Thank you, Samantha.

Yeah, it's interesting to learn a new acronym, cows.

Um, how many cows are we talking about?

Like, I just I just had a like curiosity.

Like, are there a lot of them floating around or like what does this look like?

On our property, there's just this one.

It's just one.

There's one.

I do know that there is some others being deployed in other parts of the city.

Okay, yes, but just this one on our property.

Okay, yeah, cool.

Um, all right.

Uh, any other questions or comments?

Hearing and seeing none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor, aye.

Opposed.

The ayes have it.

Mission passes.

Thanks, Samantha.

Item number four, request authorization to amend a license agreement with CHLN Incorporated for continued use of approximately 5,375 square feet of land adjacent to the Chart House restaurant on Long Wharf for seasonal outdoor restaurant seating commencing uh July 1st, 2026 and ending October 31st, 2026 with two one-year term renewal options.

Samantha.

I'm here to request approval to enter a license agreement with CHLN Incorporated to occupy approximately 5,375 square feet of land adjacent to the chart house restaurant on Long Wharf for seasonal outdoor restaurant seating.

The chart house is owned by CHLN Incorporated, but operated under the umbrella of Landry Restaurants, which is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Landry's owns and operates hundreds of eating establishments throughout the United States.

Since June of 1998, the Boston Planning and Development Agency has entered into license agreement with CHNL CHLN for two outdoor patio locations, compromised of 2002,475 square feet of land in the front and two thousand nine hundred square feet in the back and square feet of land in the rear of the restaurant to be used for a seasonal outdoor restaurant seating.

Since 2020, the City of Boston licensing board piloted an initiative to allow for expanded use of public and private spaces for outdoor dining.

The city of Boston charges a monthly fee of $399 per patio if alcohol is served.

Staff is recommending a continuance of this continuance of this mutually beneficial business arrangement and that monthly fee payable to the Boston Redevelopment Authority be consistent with the fees charged by the city of Boston for outdoor dining.

The license fee will commence on July 1, 2026 and expire on June 30th, 2027, a one-year license term with two additional one-year option terms at the discretion of the director, provided the fee charge remains consistent with or higher or higher than that of the city of Boston outdoor dining program.

The fee associated with the license uh and additional 100 1,500 security deposit per patio.

VPA staff recommends the director be authorized to enter into a license agreement with CHNLN to occupy land adjacent to the chart house restaurant and long war for seasonal outdoor restaurant seating.

Thank you.

I'm happy to answer your questions.

Thank you.

Uh questions or comments from the board.

Hearing and seeing that, a motion is in order.

So moved.

All those in favor?

Aye.

Opposed.

The ayes have it.

Mission passed.

Thanks, Samantha.

Okay.

Item number five.

Request authorization to establish a demonstration project under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 121B, Section 46F, and to adopt a demonstration project plan for the acquisition of an easement containing approximately 852 square feet for the construction of an interim deployable project.

An authorization for the director to acquire the easement and undertake the construction of an interim deployable project and execute any and all related agreements and documents in connection commencing June 19th, 2026 and ending November 30th, 2026.

Rebecca.

Thank you, Madam Chair and members of the board.

Climate Ready Boston has undertaken various initiatives to assess vulnerabilities and develop strategies for resilience since the release of its initial report in 2016.

The City of Boston's planning department, in collaboration with the Office of Climate Resilience, is addressing the immediate and near-term impacts of climate change related to coastal flooding.

The city has identified several low-lying locations that would benefit from interim flood protection measures.

These measures are intended to protect communities and assets that have already begun to or soon will start to experience flooding on a more frequent basis before long-term permanent protections are in place.

The mainstream interim deployable project addresses the flood pathway located along Main Street in Charlestown.

The proposed barrier in this alignment would be specifically engineered to withstand flood conditions corresponding to the projected 2030 1% flood elevation.

The barrier runs the length of the new bike lane within the sidewalk, beginning at the high point and continuing downhill, crossing the Shraff Center right of way, then the Massport tracks right away, and terminating at a high point in the neighboring Boston Fire Department.

The easement area is approximately 852 square feet located in the driveway of the Shiraff City Center building.

The easement agreement would allow for the construction of the deployable flood wall on property owned by the Flatley Company.

The easement will be in effect until November 30th, 2026.

The BRA must approve a demonstration project under Mass General Law for this project so that the BR BPDA may utilize its legislative authority to provide public improvements to the property and to prepare plans for the prevention of urban blake.

Thank you, and I'm happy to answer any questions.

Okay, any questions or comments from the board?

I just want to underscore uh the importance of this work, and it's not the type of thing that's going to necessarily generate news headlines, but um uh we think of the weather events caused by climate change and the uh susceptibility that we as a coastal city have.

We have been very, very lucky with the number of superstorms over the last decade.

Um, and so uh preparation is key and appreciate your work on this and um uh the impact that it will have on our city.

So thank you.

We're hoping to shine a little bit of a spotlight on the city's next deployable days here specifically, so hopefully a little bit of can you give some just color to um I'm trying to kind of put a picture in my head of what an interim deployable thing looks like.

Can you just uh yeah, just give me a little bit of a sense of what that is interim and then what is the permanent after, is that what we're studying?

Absolutely.

So in this location in particular, they certainly vary based on the infrastructure where we're in um implementing those.

Martins Park is another one that's actively under construction and to um uh terminate soon.

But in particular, so um the deployable component is there's basically two stanchions.

In this case, there's eight stanchions, but two, and then there's really slats that are placed within these stanchions, and that's the the part that is deployed.

And so, in partnership with the Office of Emergency Management, at a point in time in which flooding would be occurred, they would be deployed, they would deploy the slats there and have that protection.

And so the idea is that there can be vehicles in this case traversing when there's not a flood event happening.

Okay, um, so it would always be a deployable situation.

Sorry, so that in this location specifically, this is the short-term solution for relatively low dollar value.

There is, as part of the flatly redevelopment of 425 Medford, a broader um coastal uh permanent solution that is proposed, and so this that would essentially render this um temporary condition unnecessary, but that is also dependent on that project advancing as well.

So we wanted to do this now while there's some flooding that is anticipated in the next few years.

Okay.

No, thank you.

Um any other questions or comments?

Hearing and saying none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor?

Aye.

Opposed.

The eyes have it.

Motion passes.

Thanks, Rebecca.

Item number six, request authorization to enter into a lease agreement with St.

Francis House for the use of suites 109 and 110 located at 2 Boylston Street for a period of five years, commencing June 30th, 2026 and ending May 30th, 2031.

Dennis.

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Um, located at 39 Boylson Street, uh, directly across the street from the China Trade Center at two boilson.

St.

Francis House is the largest homeless services day shelter in Massachusetts.

Um its headquarters has been undergoing a much needed renovation, which is almost uh complete.

Um St.

Francis House contracted with Dimio Construction Company to perform the renovations, taking advantage of a mutually beneficial opportunity.

Dimio leased uh the then vacant 2,783 square foot space on the first floor of two boilson street in April of 2024.

They used it as their construction field office uh for the renovation.

Dimio and the planning department um allowed St.

Francis House to use a portion of that 2700 square foot space for supportive administrative staff while the renovations were ongoing at um uh 39 Bolson Street.

Dimio has decided not to exercise their remaining six-month option in the lease, and they uh vacated effective May 31st, 2026.

St.

Francis House has expressed an interest in entering into a lease for that same space uh directly with the Boston Development Authority.

Uh, the I think I speak for the whole planning department that we have an appreciation and respect and gratitude for the services uh provided by St.

Francis House.

Um those services are very much needed.

Um staff, including me personally, have had some very frank conversations with St.

Francis House that the space to Boston Street can only be used for administration and human resources, not for onboarding their guests or counseling or life coaching and the like.

Um simply stated it cannot become an extension of the shelter at 39 Bolson Street.

Um we've we have complete agreement with St.

Francis House that that will be the case.

Um so I have no concerns about that.

Um the economics of the proposed lease are also very defendable.

By leasing the space directly to St.

Francis House, we avoid paying a real estate commission and contributing financially to the build out of a new tenant.

The space will be offered in its as is condition.

Um we'll also uh avoid the loss of an uh we'll also avoid an extended loss of cash flow while we're waiting to locate a new tenant.

In light of these financial benefits and the use restrictions, we're proposing the following a five-year lease term with it with a single five-year option term.

Space is to be accepted in its as is condition, and uh no fixed rent payments will be owed until December 1st.

So basically we'll give them six months' free rent to spend their own money to tidy it up to the satisfaction.

Uh rent will start at $27 per square foot and will increase by a dollar square foot per year.

While the Class B office market is showing some early signs of rebound, uh I we believe that the proposed rate is reflective of the market for Class B space offered in its as is condition.

Um I believe that the economics net the planning department at least 50% more direct revenue than if we were to go to market looking for uh a stand arms length tenant.

Um, and I personally believe it's a very productive use of this publicly owned real estate, and I'm asking if you're uh your vote.

Okay, uh questions or comments from the board.

I just appreciate the department's um you know interest to sustain help sustain this organization.

Um it seems like a win-win.

I agree with you.

It is very much a one-win.

Yeah, did have ditto.

Uh all right.

There are no other questions or comments.

A motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor?

Aye.

Opposed.

The ayes have it.

Motion passes.

All right, thank you, Dennis.

Item number seven, request authorization to execute a memorandum of agreement with the city of Boston, acting by and through its property management department to formalize the assignment of municipal protective services personnel on BRA managed properties, including the China Trade Center for a period of one year commencing July 1st, 2026 and ending June 30th, 2027, at a cost not to exceed 468,864.

Rebecca.

Thank you.

This is a similar item that is presented on the EDAC agenda this time for BRA properties, which include the China Trade Center.

And as noted, um, the cost is not to exceed 468, 864 dollars.

I'm happy to answer any questions.

All right, any other questions or comments?

Hearing and seeing none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor?

Aye.

Aye.

Opposed.

The ayes have it.

Thanks, Rebecca.

Thank you.

Item number eight.

Request authorization to award final designation status to the Garrison Trotter Neighborhood Association Incorporated for the sale and redevelopment of parcel S-12C in the Washington Park Urban Renewal Area.

Project number Mass R-24, also known as 48 Townsend Street in the Roxbury neighborhood.

Ben.

Thank you, Madam Chair, members of the board.

We can go to the next slide.

We are excitedly requesting board approval to award final designation status to the Garrison Trotter Neighborhood Association for the redevelopment and sale of parcel S 12C in the Washington Park Urban Renewal Area in the Roxbury neighborhood.

This parcel is approximately 17,000 square feet abutted on all sides by privately owned housing sites with an unpaved driveway from Townsend Street.

After a community process, the BPDA issued an RFP for these parcels in May 2023 based on review and evaluation with the community.

The proposal from the Garrison Trotter Neighborhood Association was selected as the most highly advantageous, and their designation has been extended until May of next year, which you voted on last month.

Next slide.

On the uh property, the redeveloper envisions a transformation of the underutilized property into a vibrant community garden and neighborhood garden green space featuring uh communal raised uh garden beds, landscaped open areas, seating and accessible pathways.

I'll stop for a second.

Left is what is currently there, right?

Is the proposed FY.

The garden will serve local residents, families, seniors, and nearby students by providing opportunities to grow fresh produce, learn sustainable gardening practices, and participate in community programming.

In addition to supporting food access and environmental education, the space will function as a gathering place for neighborhood events, workshops, and information recreation, informal recreation.

Managed and maintained by the redeveloper, the project will create a welcoming community asset that promotes health, sustainability, and stronger neighborhood connections.

Since receiving its tenant designation, the Garrison Trotter Neighborhood Association has worked to finalize their design plan, operations, maintenance plan, provide evidence of necessary financing, find a suitable contractor, and review a draft deed and display disposition agreement.

Following this vote, the Garrison Trotter Neighborhood Association anticipates finalizing all of these things.

Their funding agreements, finalizing the plans and permits needed for work related to a retaining wall on the side of the property, uh signing an LD deed in LDA with the BPDA and then starting construction later this year.

Therefore, we are we are recommending you award final designation status to the Garrison Trotter and Neighborhood Association.

And thank you, and I'm happy to answer any questions.

Okay.

Questions or comments from the board.

Right.

Hearing and saying nine, motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor?

Aye.

Opposed.

The ayes have it.

Um motion passes.

Thanks, Ben.

Thank you.

Item number nine, request.

Request authorization to execute a contract with North Eastern Tree Services Incorporated for Arbor services at BRA owned properties citywide for a period of three years with two one-year term renewal options and for a total contract amount not to exceed 296,900.

Francis.

Afternoon, um, madam chairman, uh, members of the board, you'd like to share.

This is the same vote as we had previously for EIC, except we have a much larger tree canopy citywide than we do in the Raymond L.

Flynn Marine Park.

That's the same contract, the same amount of money, same vote.

Okay, sounds good.

Uh anybody have any additional questions?

All right.

Hearing and seeing none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor, aye.

Aye.

Opposed, the ayes have it.

Thanks, Francis.

Item number 10.

Request authorization to amend the contract with Weston and Sampson Engineers Incorporated LLC for historic envelope preservation and stabilization for the chain forge, also known as Building 105 in the Charlestown Navy Yard, to increase the contract amount by 387,345 and to approve a 20% contingency in the amount of $77,468.

For a total amended contract amount not to exceed $464,813 and a total aggregate contract amount not to exceed $778,230.

No, $253.

Rebecca.

Thank you.

I'm here to request authorization to amend the Engineering Design Services contract with Weston and Samson for the historic envelope preservation and stabilization project at Chain Forge Building 105 in the Charlestown Navy Yard.

This matter was lost before you in May 2025 when the board authorized the original design services contract in the amount of $313,440, including contingency.

Chainforge is considered a significant historic asset.

However, it remains vacant due to hazardous materials and deteriorating envelope conditions.

This project is intended to stabilize and preserve the building envelope while coordinating with the separate Brownfield's environmental remediation project currently underway.

The authorite original authorized contract with Weston and Samson to evaluate the building's roof, structural systems, interior interior deteriorator conditions, identify immediate public safety measures, and develop conceptual repair alternatives to prevent further damage and deterioration.

We are now requesting additional funds to advance the project into the next phases of design and construction support services.

This amendment will fund the schematic design development, preparation of construction documents, bidding assistance, and construction administration services.

The consultant will prepare 60% and 100% construction documents, coordinate with BPA urban design and historic preservation review requirements, assist during public bidding, and provide construction phase support, including RFIs, submittal review, site visits, and close-out documentation.

The original contract amount was $313,440.

We are requesting an increase of $387,345 plus a 20% contingency for a total amount not to exceed $464,813.

Upon approval of this amendment, the total contract value will increase to $778,253.

Funding for this amended contract is included in the fiscal year 26 capital construction budget.

Thank you, and I'm happy to answer any questions.

Okay, any questions or comments with the board?

I do have a question.

Um I'm sorry to try to read the sentence over again.

But the 60% of the construction documents, like who does the 40?

The extra 40 to make it 100.

Yeah, so um we are advancing it into the 60 and 100%.

We have already completed the 25% uh conceptual designs with Weston and Samson as well.

Oh, we're looking for an amendment to expand um beyond to those finalized documents.

Got it, got it.

Okay.

Um, any other questions or comments?

Hearing and seeing none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor, aye.

Aye opposed, the ayes have it.

Uh thanks, Rebecca.

Okay.

Item number 11, request authorization.

Did I just read that?

Or is there two?

It's a different, but it sounds looks similar.

Okay.

Request authorization to execute a contract with Weston and Sampson Engineers Incorporated for environmental engineering design services for Chain Forge Building 105 Brownfield's environmental remediation in the Charlestown Navy Yard in the amount of eight hundred and ninety-three thousand one hundred and twenty-two dollars and thirty cents, and to further execute a 15% contingency in the amount of $133,968.35 cents for a total aggregate contract amount not to exceed $1,027,090.65 cents.

Rebecca.

Thank you.

I'm here to request authorization to award and execute a contract, a new contract with both Weston and Samson for the environmental engineering design services for building 105 Brownfield's environmental remediation project.

Since acquisition by the BRA, environmental investigations have consistently identified hazardous materials that prevent occupancy in chainforge, including PCBs, heavy materials, petroleum compounds, and other contaminants.

While remediation efforts undertaken by the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers significantly reduce risks, additional cleanup work remains necessary.

In September of 2025, BPA successfully secured a four million EPA Brownfield's grant award for this project.

In addition to the federal funding, BPDA has committed half a million towards environmental remediation and two and a half million towards stabilization and preservation of the historic building envelope, representing a total public investment of approximately seven million.

In October of 2025, the board authorized staff to issue an RFP for a qualified environmental professional support implementation of the Brownfields cleanup effort.

The selected consultant will provide environmental and engineering services, EPA grant administration support, community outreach assistance, preparation of his construction documentation, construction oversight, and coordination with the concurrent historic envelope preservation and stabilization project.

The RFP was developed in close coordination with the EPA.

Two proposals were received and evaluated in accordance with VPA procurement requirements and EPA criteria.

Weston and Samson was ultimately selected based on its extensive Brownfield's grant expertise, strong understanding of the project, demonstrated capacity to perform the work and overall value to the authority.

While another proposal was received, Wesson and Samson achieved the highest overall ranking during the evaluation process.

We are requesting authorization to execute a contract with Weston and Samson in the amount of $893,122.30 cents and to approve a 15% contingency.

The total contract authorization being requested is $1,027,090.65 cents.

Funding for this project is available through the EPA Brandfield's grant and BPA fiscal year 26 capital budget.

This work is a critical step towards advancing environmental cleanup, preserving a nationally significant historic structure, and positioning Building 105 for future redevelopment opportunities through disposition.

Thank you, and I'm happy to answer any questions.

Thank you.

Questions or comments from the board.

So typically I hear we typically choose a lot of times the lowest and response, most responsible bidder, but in this instance, we uh it wasn't the lowest bid, right, that we received.

Can you just give me some context?

Absolutely.

So the bids were relatively similar.

I think through the evaluation process before we open up the bid documents themselves with the financials, we evaluate the proposals and Weston and Samson ranked highly across all of the categories, and the other proposal did not rank as highly.

And so in that case, we had already prioritized and um pref and preferenced as part of the evaluation, Weston and Samson.

And so when we opened the bids, that did certainly inform our evaluation, but I think given the closeness of the bids that we received back in Weston and Samson's ability to execute, we felt more strongly going with them.

Okay, great.

Uh additional questions or comments?

Hearing and seeing not a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor, aye.

Opposed, the ayes have it.

Motion passes.

Item number 12.

Request authorization to issue a request for proposals for construction management services for the Little Mystic Channel Harbor Walk Extension Project at the Little Mystic Channel in Charlestown.

Rebecca.

Thank you.

The Little Mystic Channel Harbor Walk Project proposes to construct a missing section of the Boston Harbor Walk to improve pedestrian connectivity in an area currently categorized by but busy truck routes and limited pedestrian infrastructure.

The proposed harborwalk extension is located on BRA owned property along the northeast corner of the Little Mystic Channel, adjacent to Terminal Street, the Auto Port, and the existing Harbor Rock Network.

The project also supports the broader open space division for the neighborhood and complements ongoing investments associated with Barrie Field, the Charlestown High School Athletic Fields, and the Little Mystic Boat Ramp.

In December of 2025, the board authorized the director to advertise and issue an invitation for bid for construction of the Harbor Walk Extension Project.

However, the original construction contract and design scope did not include construction management services.

Therefore, BPDA staff is seeking authorization to procure a qualified professional engineering consultant to provide construction management oversight for the project.

The scope of services will include part-time resident engineering services, weekly field reports, review of submittals, responses to requests for information and change orders, and project closeout services, including punch lists, coordination, and as bill documentation.

The request for proposals will be publicly advertised and procured in accordance with Massachusetts public bid law and all applicable city of Boston procurement requirements.

Funding for this work is included in the agency's fiscal year 26 capital construction budget.

Therefore, we are requesting to be authorized to advertise and issue an RFP for construction management services for the Little Mystic Channel Harbor Rock Extension Project.

Thank you.

No way to answer any questions.

All right.

Any questions or comments from the board?

Hearing and seeing none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor, I'm opposed.

The ayes have it.

Thanks, Rebecca.

Gosh, Rebecca, there's just a two more.

I flipped the page and I was like, whoops, Rebecca.

Okay.

Uh number 13.

Request authorization to execute a contract with Northern Contracting Corporation for the installation of building security systems at the Chinal Trade China Trade Center located at two Boylston Street in the amount of 1,014,000 14,100, with a 10% contingency in the amount of 101,410 for a total contract amount not to exceed 1,115,510.

Rebecca.

Thank you.

This matter was lost before you in January 2026 to request authorization to publicly advertise and issue an IFB for this work.

The project's scope includes the replacement and installation of modern security infrastructure throughout the building, including access control devices, cameras, card readers, perimeter surveillance equipment, and related electrical and masonry work required to support the new systems.

The design of the security systems and construction documents were prepared by CHA Consulting pursuant to the design contract previously authorized by the board in October of 2023.

The project was competitively bid and publicly advertised on April 6, 2026, in accordance with chapter 149 of Mass General Law.

Filed subbits for the electrical work received on May 5th, 2026, and general bids were opened on May 21st, 2026.

Two bids were received.

The lowest eligible and responsible bidder was Northern Contracting Corp and the amount of 1,014,100.

All documents required by Chapter 149 and the IFB were submitted by Northern Contracting Corp, and BPDA staff recommend awarding Northern as the lowest eligible and qualified bidder.

The total contract award is 1,150,510, which includes a recommended contingency of 10%.

Funding for this work is included in the agency's fiscal year 26 capital construction budget.

Therefore, we are requesting authorization for the director to award and execute a contract with Northern Contracting Corp.

Thank you, and I'm happy to answer any questions.

Okay.

Any questions or comments from the board?

Hearing and saying none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor, aye, opposed, the eyes have it.

Um item number 14.

Request authorization to approve the transfer of three separate parcels conveying parcel P-17B located at 1225 Washington Street in the South and Urban Renewal Project Area, project number Mass R-56, parcels RL-4 and RL-5, located along uh Lindborough Place in the South Cove Urban Renewal Area, project number Mass R-92, and two non-urban renewal parcels located at 103 and 105 Fisher Avenue in Mission Hill to the City of Boston Parks and Recreation Department.

Rebecca.

Thank you.

I'm here to request authorization to transfer five parcels across three distinct project areas from BPDA to the City of Boston Parks and Recreation Department.

All parcels directly abut existing city parks and are maintained by the Parks Department as part of their management of those parks.

This vote and transfer would formalize the existing function of these parcels while permanently protecting them as public open space.

The first parcel for transfer is parcel P17B, located at 1225 Washington Street in the south end.

This nearly 22,000 square foot parcel forms the southeasternmost edge of Peters Park, running parallel to Washington Street.

The larger adjacent parcel, P17A, forms a majority of Peters Park and was transferred from the BPDA to the Parks Department in 1991.

The next two parcels for transfer are parcels RL4 and RL5 located at 1 and 4 Linenborough Place and Bay Village in the South Cove urban renewal area.

These parcels are extremely small, each measuring less than 10 square feet and do not have direct street access.

The continuous contiguous properties are bounded by Elliott Norton Park on three sides and private residences on the fourth.

The final two parcels for transfer are non-urban renewal parcels located at 1053 and 105 Fisher Avenue in Mission Hill neighborhood.

Taken together, these two parcels total 8,000 square feet of densely wooded land contiguous to the adjacent McLaughlin Playground Park.

Following this request to transfer, these parcels will be brought before the parks commission for their formal vote to accept the properties into their inventory.

As a final step, staff would record their deeds for a nominal fee of a dollar each.

Thank you, and I'm happy to answer any questions.

Okay.

Questions or comments from the board?

Hearing and saying none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor?

Aye.

Opposed.

The ayes have it.

Thanks, Rebecca.

A glass of water.

All right.

Alright, item number 15.

Report on zoning board of appeals recommendation on trends in the recommendations written by BPDA planner to the zoning board of appeal between 10.1 2025 and 331 2026, and trends in as of right permitting between 5124 and 5126.

Thank you so much, Chair Rojas, members of the board, and Director Shen.

My name is Tarika Lakinwasum.

I'm a planning assistant on the zoning reform team, and I'll be presenting on the ZBA recommendations from the planning department during the six-month period between October 2025 to March 2026.

Later in the presentation, my colleague Jesus Mendoza and Gonzalez will discuss the impact of rezoning in East Boston.

Between 2023 to 2025, the Zoning Board of Appeal had an 8 to 10% decrease in volume of cases.

This decrease could be attributed due to a broader economic conditions as well as incremental progress of zoning reform.

Next slide, please.

Overall, from October 1st, 2025 to March 31st, 2026, there have been a total of 321, including deferrals from the CBA, sub-article 80 cases.

The planning department wrote 274 recommendations, excluding four deferral recommendations, while the ZBA issued 274 final decisions and 47 deferrals.

When looking at our last report from the period of April 1st, 2025 to September 31st, 2025, this time period, which only had which in this time period only had 268 decisions.

Next slide, please.

The previous table did not include the 39 Article 80 projects that came before the CBA.

The decisions of these projects were 24 approved, four approved with provisos, 10 deferred, and one withdrawn.

The table on the slide shows a 44% increase of Article 80 cases coming before the ZBA between 2023 to 2025.

Next slide, please.

During the six-month period, the planning department recommended approval for 250 cases, and of those 250 cases, 67% were approved and 33% were approved with proviso.

Furthermore, the planning department and the ZBA have the same recommendation and decision for 198 cases out of this 274 final decisions, which is the 72% agreement rate.

The breakdown of all 321 cases, similarities and differences between the CBA and the planning department can be found below.

Next slide, please.

Through this table and the with the rest of the 2025 cases, we'll be able to create benchmarks about the cases that only receive conditional use permits, cases that receive permits that include a variance permit, and the total number of cases without deferrals for each neighborhood.

The top five violations of all cases were one FAR excessive, two side yard insufficient, three year rear yard insufficient, four parking or loading insufficient, and five law area insufficient.

Next slide, please.

Further reports will continue to feature preliminary data for other rezoning and modernization efforts as we continue to track our progress towards reducing reliance on the zoning board of appeal.

For the next part of this presentation, I will be passing off to my colleague to discuss the impact of rezoning in East Boston.

Good afternoon, Cherojas, members of the board, and uh Director Shen.

My name is Jesus Mendoza Gonzalez, and I am a comprehensive planner with the comprehensive planning team.

This final section provides an early look at permitting activity in East Boston since the updated neighborhood zoning was adopted in 2024, April 2024, I should say.

The goal is to understand what kinds of projects are now able to move forward under Plan East Boston and what early permitting activity tells us about implementation.

Next slide, please.

So over the two-year period, uh 81 ass of right projects uh were filed.

Uh the important takeaway here is the range.

Uh these filings are not concentrated in one category.

They reflect different ways residents, property owners, property owners, and businesses are using the updated uh code.

In 26 cases, homeowners were able to add or expand residential properties.

Uh in 21, applicants move forward with new construction.

Another 21 filings involve commercial use or occupancy changes, while 13 supported exterior or accessibility improvements to existing buildings.

So the early picture is not just one of large development, it is also one of homeowners adding space, businesses adapting, and existing buildings being able to improve or be made more accessible.

Next slide, please.

Looking beyond the overall filings, the issued permits help us show which types of projects are already moving forward.

What we see is not again a single pattern.

Some issued permits are supporting commercial reuse and new neighborhood services, while others are supporting new residential construction, additions, ADUs, accessory dwelling units, I should say, alterations, and then of course occupancy-related changes.

So this gives us a useful next layer of detail where we can suggest that activity is not only broad on paper, but it is beginning to show up in actual permitted projects.

Next slide, please.

Commercial activity gives us some of the clearest examples of everyday neighborhood outcomes.

The issued commercial permits include two daycare facilities, three coffee shops, six personal care and grooming services, and one ground floor commercial or office space.

Examples include Little Steps Child Care Center, Cafe de los Sport Eastie, of Anti Hera Fashions, and commercial office space at 301 Border Street.

These are the kinds of uses residents interact with directly.

Childcare, coffee shops, salons, barbershops, small businesses, and active ground floor spaces.

And so in practical terms, the code update is allowing existing buildings and commercial spaces to adapt over time and better serve everyday neighborhood needs.

Next slide, please.

On the residential side, the issued permits also show projects moving forward at different scales.

Examples include five triple deckers, one double triple decker, one twelfth multifamily residential project, and one larger Article 80 mixed use project.

A good example is 355 Bennington Street, shown on the lower right.

That project represents a larger end of the activity capture here with 170 with a 170 mixed use development with ground floor commercial space.

At the same time, the triple deckers and smaller multifamily projects show incremental housing being added across individual sites.

So the point is that not all residential activity looks the same.

East Boston is both seeing smaller infill housing and larger residential growth moving forward through issued permits.

Next slide, please.

This final slide highlights another part of the story, which is growth through existing structures or existing buildings, permits for accessory dwelling units or ADUs, residential conversions, small scale rebuilds, and vertical additions show that new homes are also being created within East Boston's existing neighborhood fabric.

This is a quieter but important form of growth.

It allows the housing supply to increase while working with buildings and lots that are already part of the neighborhood.

And together with commercial activity and new construction permits, this points to a more balanced uh pattern of change, new housing, small business activity, and reinvestment in the existing buildings and neighborhoods.

Taken together, the first two years show that East Boston's updated zoning is beginning to function across several important sites.

It is allowing new businesses to open, helping families and property owners to improve their homes.

It is supporting housing production at multiple scales, and it is also creating more opportunities for existing buildings to adapt.

These are still early signs, but they are measurable signs that as of right activity is moving forward under the updated zoning.

Thank you for your time.

And my colleague Tarica and I would be glad to take any questions.

Okay, thanks so much.

And first let me apologize, Derek, for mispronouncing your name.

I'll get that right next time.

Questions or comments from the board.

Thank you, Therica, and thank you, Jesus.

I really enjoy these briefings because it's just so fascinating to see.

And again, I think it uh this department deserves credit for really um embracing a transparency as it relates.

So great.

So just what one question which I found interesting on an earlier slide.

Uh 2025 was the first of the last three years to reject or to deny one without prejudice, one flat denial, or what one with yeah, one without prejudice, one flat denial, Article 80 projects at the ZBA.

What were those projects?

I don't have those answers on me currently, but I am happy to send that over.

Yeah, so I just want out of curiosity because obviously it gets to that point.

These have been very, very well vetted.

So I was more curious.

And again, for those who are watching, denied with prejudice allows for a little more flexibility come back, straight out denied.

You ain't coming back, you know, for a year.

Yeah.

So that's that's um curious what caused those.

So yeah, I'd love to share that with a little forward.

But that's all.

Thank you both, and thank you to your teams.

Thank you.

Okay, just enough questions or comments.

Yeah, I guess it would be helpful to hear what you guys think this data is telling us and how it will be used or how it should be used.

Sorry.

Um we're using this data to mostly show how our zoning reform is working.

It's really important for not only us but our the city in general to see that the work that we are doing is showing incremental progress for our ZBAs and also that we're making the CBA process shorter and easier for our constituents to be building, and that our initiatives in the future are gonna be also helpful to this process as well.

Additional questions or comments.

Um, I do want to say this is um uh I love this informational update.

Look forward to it every quarter.

Can't believe we're here to the next quarter.

Um, but can you just refresh my um my memory from a timeline perspective?

Kind of what that variance is, right?

When something can go through as of right versus kind of a prior um typical timeline.

Right.

Um, so when you have a buy right project, it usually takes one to four months.

Um, I think Kathleen will answer the actual.

I think it does really depend on the project.

And it uh, as um board member Bennett was asking, right?

Part of why we're cutting this data so many different ways is because of the complexity.

Something might be as of right for zoning and going through complicated permitting at CONCOM or the landmarks commission or one of our sister regulating departments.

Um, that's part of why we've started breaking out the conditional uses versus the with the variance because those are right um ways we want to understand how the zoning is working.

Um, it's also part of why we're doing these deep dives into seeing what's actually changed and what's going through in places where we've done the zoning so we can see the sort of multifaceted way those are those impacts.

Um variances are um granted as legal rights for a period of one year.

They're renewable on an annual basis.

Uh, if you have not filed your building permit for up to another sort of year period, you have to demonstrate hardship of why you haven't been able to file your building permit that you're waiting for some other component of fire review, some other permitting activity, or you know, have run out of funds to be able to embark on the project.

So they do expire, right, as a sort of legal right that is granted, as it's entirely possible that some of the variances that are granted here that we're bringing you in these totals may expire.

They may also just be renewed on a basis.

That is also part of that difference of lagging is part of why we wanted to show you a little bit of the difference between what's filing as a right versus what's actually made it through the fire department, all other components of permitting to actually advancing their construction.

And that's because we take really seriously our role as part of the sort of overall permitting ecosystem in the city.

Um we can be a big part of helping speed up some of that appropriately at the small scale, but we also have to be really mindful of where all of our sister departments are in part of that process in the ways that impacts overall timelines.

Great.

Yeah, and I just again the I love the level of detail and the analysis that's going into this and to get these early um uh these early results.

So thank you for that.

Um, uh, you know, dream come true.

Been looking forward to seeing the results for these.

So um it's it's great to see.

So keep up the great work.

Um, yeah.

Any other questions or comments?

This is just informational, so really appreciate the information.

Thank you.

All right, that's a fun one.

Uh B16, okay.

Item number 16, request authorization to grant permission to sign the municipal planning board notification form on behalf of the board, signifying that the board has been notified of the intention of Sale Boston Incorporated to file a chapter 91 license application with the Department of Environmental Protection.

Ted.

Good evening, Madam Chair, members of the board and director Shen.

My name is Ted Schwartzburg, assistant deputy director for planning review.

Next month, Boston Harbor will host sale Boston from July 10th to through July 16th.

Many vessels will dock at existing piers and wharves.

However, because current facilities within Boston Harbor can't provide sufficient docking space.

Sale Boston has submitted a chapter 91 license application to the State Department of Environmental Protection to install temporary pile head pile-held floats in the watersheet at the Mokley Federal Courthouse, located at 12 Northern Avenue on the right side of this image, and in the watersheet off Wharf 8, located at 288 Northern Avenue on the left side of this image.

The temporary pile held floats will be used for docking commercial passenger vessels during the 2026 sale Boston event only.

There's no need for a vote following this evening.

Staff will inform the Department of Environmental Protection that our board has been notified of this chapter 91 application.

Thank you.

Okay.

So I don't take a vote.

Okay.

That's all.

All right.

Um, do we have any questions?

We're not voting, but it's still information.

Is anybody we okay?

Um, great.

Thanks said.

Okay.

Uh item number 17.

Request authorization to issue a certificate of completion for the successful completion of the Alston Lab Works Project located at 250 through 280 Western Avenue and 305 Western Avenue, pursuant to section C dot four of the cooperation agreement by and between the Boston Redevelopment Authority doing business as a boss of planning and development agency, and Austin Lab Works Developer LLC, dated August 4th, 2022.

Uh, this is just the certificate of completion, so uh there's no presentation.

Um, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor, aye.

Opposed, and the eyes have it.

Commission passes.

Item number 18.

Request authorization to issue a certification of approval pursuant to Article 80E small project review of the zoning code for the proposed construction of 20 residential rental units, including three IZ units, uh and 28 bicycle parking spaces located at 170 through 172 Western Avenue, and to execute a community benefit agreement, which take all related actions.

Dan.

Thank you, and good morning.

Good evening, Madam Chair, members of the board.

Director Shen, my name is Daniel Blanco.

I'm the project manager for the small project before you this evening, uh properly located at 170 172 Western Avenue in the Alston neighborhood.

On February 20th, 2026, the proponent 170 Western Ave Realty LLC filed an application for a small project review for the plan with the plan department for the development of a 4,979 square foot commercial site situated at 170 172 Western Avenue in Austin at the intersection of Western Avenue and Travis Street.

For the construction of a new eight-story mixed use building.

Plan department sponsored and held a virtual meeting on March 16th, 2026.

With the meeting posted at the Planning Department's webpage, and the notification was emailed to all subscribers at the Planning Department's Ulster's neighborhood update list.

Public comment period for this project ended on March 31st, 2026.

Next slide, please.

The proposed project looks to construct a new eight-story mixed use building utilized mass timber frame construction containing 20 residential rental units, two ground floor retail spaces, the dry cleaner and a beauty nail salon, and non and no off street parking spaces.

One three bedroom units and three uh three of residential rental units with low income restricted units.

And also, in addition to that, uh this project will also uh maintain the new the dry cleaner that that is currently there.

That's been there since 1960s.

Um, and that's one thing that the community has been asking about.

Uh and it will remain there as well as a new viewing nail salon on the ground floor.

Uh, in addition to that, um the project will also uh include a $5,005 uh $500 uh BTD contribution as well.

Um with that, I'll now turn over to my colleague Michelle Yi to speak on the zoning slides.

Thank you.

Thank you, Daniel.

Good evening.

My name is Michelle Yee, and I am the planner assigned to this project.

The proposed project at 170 to 172 Western Avenue is located within the Alston Brighton Neighborhood Zoning District within the Barries Corner Community Commercial or CC1 subdistrict.

This portion of Western Avenue is a key note of Barry's Corner, a formerly underutilized area turned into a pedestrian friendly destination within the area, highlighted with the Trader Joe's.

In regards to transportation, there are three blue bike stations within 0.2 miles of the project site.

Additionally, it is 0.9 miles to the Boston Lane Commuter Rail Station.

It has access to the MBTA 66, 70 and 86 bus routes.

Next slide, please.

The proposed project also falls within the study area of the Western Avenue corridor study and rezoning, also known as Wacker Z, which was adopted by the BPDA board in October 2022 and codified into zoning in November 2022.

Wacker Z established a guide for new development along Western Avenue that will provide necessary housing, support an optimized mix of land uses, and create new open spaces.

It also created new zoning for large-scale development through plan development areas or PDAs.

Although the proposed project does not qualify as a PDA, it is still consistent with the planning principles and goals behind Wacker Z through contributing to a vibrant berries corner with the creation of housing and commercial units while also increasing setbacks to help expand sidewalks along Western Avenue.

While the proposed project will need variances for dimensional regulations including height and FAR, zoning relief is appropriate given the proposed project's consistency with the local planning contact as well as the provisions of section 7-3 of the zoning code.

Thank you.

And now I'll turn it over to my colleague Andrew Zimmerman from the Urban Design Division to present the project in more detail.

Good evening.

My name is Andrew Zimmerman, and I am the urban designer assigned to this project.

This proposal sets the building back to align with Boston Complete Streets Guidelines, establishing a pedestrian oriented frontage along both Western Avenue and Travis Street.

The primary retail space opens directly onto this Western Avenue elevation, reinforcing an active public realm.

Streetscape enhancements include removing an obsolete curb cut on Travis Street and planting four new trees, one on Western Ave and three on Travis Street to enrich the pedestrian experience.

New curb ramps and a crosswalk will be installed at Travis Street while the project will accommodate improved bike infrastructure along Western AV.

Next slide, please.

The proponent proposes replacing their single-story building at 170 to 172 Western AV with a eight-story mixed-use structure.

The new building will feature ground floor retail base, rental apartments above, and a common roof deck.

The building massing is responsive to the planning context and anticipated improvements at the neighboring site 180 Western Avenue.

Designed with a mix of brick and metal cladding and large format punched openings.

The building places its residential entrance on Travis Street.

Additionally, the proponent is exploring reincorporating elements of the beloved Flint Cleaner's existing sign into the proposed project as a way to honor the site's history and character.

Thank you, and I will now turn it back to Daniel Blanco.

Thank you, Andrew.

Yeah, this concludes our presentation for the item.

We have development team here to answer any questions you may have.

Okay.

Thank you.

Questions or comments from the board?

Just curious.

Uh, what's the bedroom breakdown for the three IDP units?

Uh my name's Dan Chen, I'll architect, and um the IDP breakdown is two.

Um, two two bedrooms and one one bedroom.

Okay, thank you.

And it's just what the only the number of three bedroom units is just one, correct?

That is correct, and that's on the top floor.

Okay, thank you.

Quick question.

Uh, and for the mass timber, love to see mass timber on this building.

So I was like, hoping you're gonna ask that.

Uh any of the mass timber will it be exposed or shown through any openings.

So, because of the building height, uh, we're taking advantage of mass timber, which is a special sort of uh type four construction in the new building code.

Um, we our goal is to expose as much as we can within the context of fire protection and life safety, and so we're we're we're hoping to do that.

Does this build in exceed the 85 feet or it's at 85?

It's high 85 feet.

Okay, thank you.

Cool.

All right.

Any other questions or comments?

Um, all right, hearing and seeing nine.

A motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor, aye.

Opposed.

Guys have it.

Motion passes.

Congratulations.

Thank you.

Good luck.

Item number 19.

Request authorization to issue a certification of approval pursuant to Article 80E small project review of the zoning code for the proposed construction of 16 residential rental units, including two IDP units, 16 car parking spaces, and 16 high school parking spaces located at 24 Mount Everett Street, and to enter into an affordable rental housing agreement and restriction and enter into a community benefits agreement as take all related actions.

Jack.

Thank you and good evening, Madam Chair, members of the board and Director Shen.

My name is Jack Gilman, and I'm a project assistant with development review.

I'm here before you to present the small projects located at 24 Mount Everett Street in the Dorchester neighborhood.

On September 3rd, 2024, McGregor 1 LLC filed a small project review application for a proposal that redevelops the 14,400 and 429 square foot site and consists of a renovation in addition to the existing structure.

The BBDA hosted a virtual public meeting on October 1st, 2024.

The public meeting was noticed on the BPTA's events calendar and sent to the Dorchester neighborhood distribution list.

Comment period ended on October 11th, 2024.

Following a project update, a supplemental filing was submitted to the BPTA on April 23rd, 2026, which will uh initiated a second public comment period.

Uh a second public meeting was held on May 7th, 2026, and the comment period ended on May 26, 2026.

Next slide, please.

The proposed project looks to create an addition to the existing three story six-unit multifamily dwelling.

The addition will be to the rear of the existing structure, remaining at three stories in height.

The total gross floor area of the building will be up to 21,585 square feet.

The existing structure will undergo renovation, which includes moderate facade changes and construction to allow for uh basement bicycle parking.

The proposed projects will add 10 residential rental units to the existing six units to create an up to 16 unit residential rental building.

The proposed residential rental units include 10 one-bedroom units, five two-bedroom units in one studio unit, and two out of the 16 units will be affordable units.

The proposed project will also provide up to 16 off-street uh vehicular parking spaces as well.

Uh and with that, I will turn it over to my colleague Ford DeVecchio to present the planning context for the project.

Okay.

Thank you.

Good evening.

My name is Ford Del Vecchio, and I'm the planning reviewer assigned to this project.

The proposed project is situated on Mount Everett Street, in a primarily residential area, consisted of mainly three-story, three family homes.

This fully residential project is designed to integrate the surrounding neighborhood, the exist the surrounding neighborhood.

The existing structure will undergo renovation and construction to allow for a rear edition and basement bicycle parking.

The front facing facades will remain as currently constructed in order to maintain consistency with neighborhood context.

Located 0.7 miles from both the Ubbham's Corner Commuter Rail Station and the Four Cornerslash Geneva station.

The proposed project is well served by transit.

Next slide, please.

The proposed multifamily use is an existing condition found in the site with six units in the existing dwelling.

The proposed project's atypical parcelization, merit zoning relief due to its unusual size and shape.

While the subject parcel is roughly three times as large as the typical parcel found on this block, due to its mid-block location, subdivision would not be practical.

The large parcel size mitigates overall density and allows for design that preserves much of the usual existing contextual streetscape.

Thank you.

And I will now turn over to my colleague Seth Risen from the UD department to discuss the project in more detail.

Cool.

Thank you for it.

Seth Reisman Urban Design, and I'm actually here standing in for the uh urban design reviewers who could not be here tonight.

And I'm also learning how to use my new reading glasses while also looking long distance.

So I'm fully in the like this zone, so yeah.

If I get this a little wrong here, but um, the irregular T-shaped site allows for the preservation of several mature trees in the backyard, helping to maintain significant existing tree canopy.

Additionally, 25 new canopy and understory trees, which are significant for the size of this site, will provide long-term environmental benefits for the neighborhood.

The majority of the parking is placed beneath the addition and screened from the street.

A new act grade entrance provides accessibility while overall maintaining the existing structure's relationship to the street.

Next slide, please.

Will be preserved, helping to retain the consistency of scale along Mount Everett Street.

The rear addition allows for new residential units to be integrated into this community in a sensitive manner.

The parking will be mostly out of sight.

We believe this to be a strong example of creative adaptive reuse.

Allowing for additional housing while respecting the existing neighborhood context.

And I'll turn it back to Jack.

Thank you, and that concludes the presentation.

The proponent team is here to answer any questions you may have.

Okay.

Can you just go back to the slide before that just shows and it's showing the picture?

Um any questions or comments from the board?

Just a comment to uh again thank uh the teams involved on the adaptive reuse.

It's not only the right sustainability of play, but um the aesthetics matter, you know.

I think I think all of us drive around sometimes and see new projects that that seem boxy or lacked character, you know, particularly in this neighborhood to be able to preserve that facade, I think is really important.

It's gonna be a much much better project as a result, so I'm grateful for the work uh to do that, and I hope we continue to see more of that.

Yeah, I really appreciate this picture because I was trying to figure out figure out.

I was like, how do you add 10 more units?

But that is an interesting site.

Is that just kind of a one-off thing, or do we have like sites like this?

Other places where we could get an extra 10 units in there?

Um I think it this site is a little unique.

Um I know on the other slide it shows the parcel of the way it goes to the back and then has that extra section where the trees are.

Yeah.

Um, I'm sure there could be other projects in the future that could do the same thing, but this site was a little unique.

Yeah.

In terms of its shape, and I think the proponent team did a good job kind of keeping it at scale with the neighborhood.

Yeah, because they're like six, they're like regular sized units.

They're not like micro or anything, right?

Nope.

Okay.

Cool.

Um, all right.

Any other questions or comments?

Uh hearing and seeing not emotions order.

So move.

All those in favor?

Aye.

Opposed.

The eyes have it.

Uh motion passes.

Good job, Jack.

Right.

Item number two.

20.

Like, uh request authorization to issue a certification of approval.

Pursuant to Article 80E Small Project Review of the Zoning Code for the proposed construction of seven and 70 residential rental units, including 11 inclusionary zoning units and 70 bicycle parking spaces located at 11 Avenue de Lafayette, and to accept a quick claim deed for a certain temporary limited property interest in the project site and to enter into a pilot agreement for the proposed project and to take all related actions.

Dylan.

Good evening, Madam Chair, members of the board, and Director Shen.

My name is Dylan Norris.

I'm a project manager with the development review division of the planning department, and I'm here to present an applicant of Mayor Wu's downtown office to residential conversion program.

The proposed Article ADE small project located at 11 Avenue de Lafayette in the neighborhood in the downtown neighborhood of Boston, as well as the proposed 121B agreement needed to effectuate the downtown residential conversion incentive pilot program.

Next slide.

On March 12th, 2026, Tebow Property Development or the proponent applied to Mayor Wu and the BPDA's downtown residential conversion incentive pilot program, which was authorized by this board on October 12th, 2023.

Based on BP Day staff review under Article 80 and review under the pilot program, the proponent has been selected to receive a pilot agreement based on the program criteria.

The program will the proponent will, upon approval by this board, enter into a pilot agreement among the City of Boston and the BPDA.

In order to comply with the rules and regulations under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 121B Section 16, the BPDA must take a property interest in the site.

Furthermore, a small project review application was then filed with the planning department on May 5th, 2026, submission of which initiated the small project review process.

The planning department hosted a virtual public meeting on May 26, 2026, which was well attended and well received.

The public meeting was noticed on the planning department's event calendar as well as sent to the downtown neighborhood and Chinatown neighborhood distribution lists.

The common period ended on June 4th, 2026.

You can go to the next slide.

The project site is a 10,821 square foot site in downtown and features a contiguous five-story plus basement office and commercial building located at 11 Avenue de Lafayette.

The project site is then bounded by Chauncey Street to the west, Avenue de Lafayette to the north, and Essex Street to the south.

Just for some additional zoning context, the 11 Avenue de Lafayette project is regulated by the Sky Subdistrict of the Zoning Code and sits within the very edge of Plan Downtown.

We do want to note that a small portion of this project is also located within the Chinatown Commercial District.

For a further note, while the project is in the Sky District, the Sky District as a performance standard, does not allow ground floor dwelling units within the stated goals of Plan Downtown to diversify ground floor uses as well as maintaining an active street wall.

However, the plan also encourages converting underutilized office buildings into housing to enhance the downtown's overall mixed use character.

Given the three unique elevations between Chauncey Street, Essex Street, and Avenue de Lafayette, the proposed project may require a variance from the Board of Appeals pending an interpretation from the inspectional service department for their ground floor residential units.

Given the site context on Chauncey and Avenue de Lafayette, where these units are present, the preservation of existing retail on Essex Street and the three to four foot elevation change from the right of way to the first floor of this building, we feel a variance, if a variance is required, relief would be appropriate.

You can go to the next slide.

The proposal proposes to convert the existing floors of the building, floors one through five here, to a residential use, which will create approximately 70 residential units.

The conversion is contemplated as an interior renovation of the existing structure.

The building footprint height massing will remain unchanged and no enlargement of the extension of floor areas proposed.

Existing ground floor retail fronting esque street will be preserved and remain in operation in accordance with the Office to Residential Conversion Program requirements.

Thank you.

And that concludes my presentation.

Kimberly Powell from the proponent team is available virtually if we have any other questions.

Thank you.

Okay, thank you.

Questions or comments from the board.

So I I don't never presume to speak for my colleagues, but I think I'm safe to say how excited we all are to vote on these every meeting.

There's one or two new really exciting conversions.

So in the packet it talks about a third aspect of this is entering into a pilot agreement.

Do we do that with all these conversions to sort of offset some of the the taxes?

There have been a few uh projects within the office to residential conversion program that just based on the tax structure of how they have organized their property development.

It's not a benefit for them to receive a tax abatement from the city.

Um but the vast majority, I think we've only had two of our 26 not receive the pilot agreement or proceed with the pilot agreement.

And we negotiate that sort of bespoke based on the part of the program prior to them filing for Article 80 review is a financial review with our policy team where they kind of you know assess whether or not it is viable for them, but given even if they do not need a tax abatement, uh having a streamlined review process and a stream-line permitting process does benefit getting these units online faster.

No, I mean I I think we are writing a blueprint for other cities that are facing similar sort of changes in downtown how to do this.

So I think whatever we're doing is has been a great uh great initiative, and thank you to you and your team for um continuing to bring us these good news.

So excited to support it.

And it's a great location.

I it's very close to my work.

I you know it's gonna be some lucky people are gonna live there.

Yeah, yes, uh great location.

Um, definitely excited about the program.

Um, but I will echo counselor Durkin's message uh last um meeting when it comes to the construction of these projects.

We would love to see responsible contractors on these projects.

Uh recently I was at Madison Park High School with young students that are eventually will graduate and we'll be looking for opportunities to work on projects such as this in this beautiful neighborhood.

Um but with that said, I would also like to ask one thing you did mention is other cities that uh have partaken of this basically similar time we started.

Do we have like a, you know, not a race, you know, the Celtics lost, the Knicks won, whatever.

How are we doing compared to other major cities when it comes to um these conversions?

I'm gonna turn that over to the senior policy manager, John Lyle.

I saw you back there.

Good evening.

How are you?

Uh John Weil, uh head of office to residential conversions for the planning department.

Um Vice Chair Shepard, I think it's as with everything, um, I think that you have to look at this sort of on a scale basis, where often we're compared to New York City, they are in essence 10 times bigger than Boston is.

And so my understanding in speaking with my counterparts in New York is that they're doing about call two to three thousand uh units of housing per year.

And so that would put our number at sort of if we were at 10 to 1 at 2 to 300, but we're vastly exceeding that.

So we're doing something closer to about uh six to seven hundred units of housing through this program per year.

So it's one of these things where they started back in the 1990s when um a lot of Wall Street's activity shifted over to Jersey City with the with the uptake of internet trading.

We've been very fortunate in the city of Boston that office has remained highest and best used up to about uh 2020.

So that the conversions like this are more recent phenomenon here in Boston.

So I think that we're very proud of the progress that we've made, and we feel that we've made very meaningful impact, but we always have to do that little bit of mental math of we're a tenth the size of New York City.

So when you see articles sometimes sit just talking about the sheer volume of conversion, uh, we appear lower down on those rankings, but on a per capita basis, I think we are pretty much leading the pack.

Thank you.

That answers your question.

Definitely does, thank you.

Yeah, and how um what is the the unit mix again?

Like 70.

Um split between these micro or like there are um a couple of units that would fall under the micro range, none of the IZ units have been selected or fall into that AMI range.

Um, but the unit breakdown is there where two one bedroom units, uh, one two-bedroom units and nine studios, which is proportionate to the uh rest of the studio count.

Yeah, so the mainly studios, like 55 studios, yeah.

Uh the seven years.

Okay.

Cool.

All right.

Um, okay.

Any other questions or comments?

Hearing and seeing none.

A motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor?

Aye.

Opposed.

Guys have it.

Motion passes.

Thank you.

Thank you.

All right, item number 21.

Request authorization to issue a certification of approval pursuant to Article 80E Small Project Review of the Zoning Code for the proposed construction of 21 residential rental units, including four IZ units, uh, 15 car parking spaces, 32 bicycle parking spaces located at 662 through 666 East Broadway, and to enter into a community benefits agreement and to take all related actions.

Dylan.

Thank you, and good evening, Madam Chair, members of the board and director Shen.

Um, my name is Dylan Norris, and I'm a project manager with the Development Review Division of Boston.

Um, I'm here to present the Article 80E Small Project located at 662 to 666 East Broadway, located in South Boston.

The proposed project is a four-story mixed-use residential structure sited on East Broadway and K Street with ground floor retail fronting East Broadway.

You can go to the next slide.

The project site is approximately 10,000 uh square feet in size and is currently location of two single-story commercial buildings, one three-story residential building, and one two and a half story residential building.

The project proposes to demolish the existing structures and erect a new building, which will contain 21 residential rental units, including four income restricted units pursuant to Article 79.

Uh, one ground floor commercial unit of approximately 4800 square feet will be used by the proponent as an expanded space for his existing uh liquor store business, Dorganis package store.

The project will provide uh below grade parking for 15 motor vehicles accessed off of K Street.

And now I'm gonna turn it over to Ford Del Vecchio to give the planning context.

Thank you.

Thank you, Dylan.

Um perfect.

The proposed project is located within the South Boston Neighborhood Zoning District's multifamily residential slash local service subdistrict, governed by the zoning code Article 68.

The program and design are both consistent with the existing surrounding context of multifamily and mixed-use buildings along the East Broadway commercial corridor, featuring active commercial use on the ground floor and residential units above.

To clear the site for construction, the proponent tends to demolish four existing buildings currently under their ownership, two single-story commercial buildings, one three-story residential building, and one two and a half story residential building.

While accounting for the surrounding neighborhood context, staff actively help shape the project's design to ensure the building scale and massing are contextually appropriate for the East Broadway corridor.

Furthermore, proposed parking count and below grade parking design align with contemporary best practices and Boston Transportation Department policy for transit-rich neighborhoods.

Staff ultimately determined that the continu that continuing and active ground floor commercial use for the expanded local liquor store will successfully preserve and enhance neighborhood serving retail character of the East Broadway corridor.

Thank you.

I'll now turn it over to my UD colleague He Young Li to discuss the project in more detail.

Okay.

Thank you and good evening.

My name is Hiang Li.

I'm a senior landscape architect and primary site design rebureau for this project.

Um in the proposed condition on the right hand side, the active retail frontage along East Broadway is complemented by public land improvements, including new street trees, short-term bike parking, and permeable furnishing zones that help activate the building entrances while supporting the project stormwater management strategy.

On K Street, does site design contributed to the overall project through a combination of shared outdoor amended space, landscape improvements, and enhanced pedestrian circulation.

The proposed curb extensions at the intersection of East Broadway and K Street will also improve pedestrian visibility and help calm traffic.

Next slide, please.

The architectural design provides a strong sense of continuity along East Broadway through a cohesive material pallet and active ground floor retail frontage.

Over the course of the project review, the predominant facade material was revised to break, and the top floor was stepped back in line with the neighboring building to reduce its visual presence along East Broadway.

The project was also refined to increase the site yard on K Street and introduced the landscape entrance court to create uh create a more generous transition to the existing residential fabric.

The case tree facade is further articulated through uh modulation and projective bay windows to help break down the project massing and better relate to its surrounding neighborhood.

Um thank you, and I'll turn it back to the project manager.

Thank you, heyang.

And I just want to leave on a final note that this project has both been responsive to neighborhood and community concerns as well as planning staff feedback throughout the review process, resulting in revisions to the massing along East Broadway and K Street that you see, as well as revisions to the onsite parking count.

This will conclude our presentation for this item, and the development team is available to answer any questions you may have.

Thank you.

Questions or comments from the board?

Yes, I'm just curious.

Under jobs second bullet point, eight permanent jobs, those the jobs associated with the liquor store.

Uh good afternoon, uh Madam Chair, uh members, Director Shem, George Morris.

I represent the developer here, Sing Ming Chan.

Uh combination of both.

Uh, Mr.

Chan owns the current liquor store that is there.

There are a few employees there.

Uh he also owns and holds all of his rental properties, all the developments that he's done.

21 units is likely that this will have at least a couple people acting as property managers for Mr.

Chan.

So it's about eight eight people.

Okay.

Makes sense.

And then what's the um I may ask this because I noticed the number associated with some of the other projects prior to this.

What's the blue bike's contribution that wasn't listed on the screen?

I think it's about 6575.

Yeah, I'd say, yeah, around $6,000.

It's it's whatever the requirement is.

Uh yeah.

No, curious, good.

Okay, thank you.

All right.

Uh, any other questions or comments?

Okay, hearing and saying none.

A motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor.

All right.

Opposed.

The ayes have it.

Motion passes.

Thank you.

Um, all right.

So we're right at 5 30.

I'm sorry, before we go to the break.

Could we take two quick votes, please?

Oh, okay, yeah.

I'm sorry.

No, no, no.

That's totally fine.

We need to go back to B 16, please.

Where we previously said, we do not need a vote.

We stand corrected.

We do need a vote.

Okay.

If I could ask you to please reread the agenda item and then vote.

Thank you.

Okay.

Cool.

So let's go.

Uh item number 16.

Request authorization to grant permission to sign the municipal planning board notification form on behalf of the board.

Signifying that the board has been notified of the intention of Sale Boston Incorporated to file a chapter 91 license application with the Department of Environmental Protection.

Does anybody have any additional questions or comments?

Hearing and seeing that a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

All those in favor.

I host the ayes have it.

Motion passes.

And then was there another one?

And then the email.

And then, oh yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Let's do that so you can.

Skitty at all.

Okay, item number 23.

Request approval for or of the fiscal year 2027 operating budget of the Boston Redevelopment Authority and the expense amount of 26,545,000, and approval for the fiscal year 2027 capital budget expenditures and the amount of 5,800,000.

And approval of the transfer of funds and for investment interagency debt between the BRA and the Economic and Industrial Corporation of Boston, the Boston Local Development Corporation and the Boston Industrial Development Finance Authority.

And approval to enter into any interagency sub-lease for space, sublease amendments or extensions, and to take uh and to authorization to take actions and execute documents and agreements related to the transfer in and expenditure or transfer of funds out of the capital reserve fund.

Michelle.

Thank you, Madam Chair, members of the board, Director Shen, no presentation, just seeking authorization for the vote.

Thank you.

Okay, awesome questions or comments from the board.

Hearing and seeing that a motion is in order.

So move.

Second.

All those in favor?

All right.

And then we can make it a little bit more than that.

Okay, um, welcome back.

So we're now moving on to the public hearing portion of the agenda.

It is uh item number twenty-two.

Madam Chair, I will have to recuse myself from item number twenty-two.

Okay, thank you.

Right.

Um, good afternoon.

This is a public hearing before the Boston Redevelopment Authority doing business as the Boston Planning and Development Agency being held in conformance with articles eighty B-5 and 80 C-5 of the Boston Zoning Code to consider the proposed First Amendment to the master plan for Plan Development Area Number 128 L Street Station Redevelopment at 776 Summer Street in South Boston, and the development plan for Phase 2 within Plan Development Area number 128 L Street station redevelopment and phase two project as proposed by HRP 776 Summer Street Prop.

LLC care of HRP group in conjunction with the Redgate Capital Partners as a development impact project.

This hearing was duly advertised on May 27, 2026.

This is a BBC hearing on a proposed petition by the agency.

Staff members will first present their case and are subject to questioning by members of the agency.

Thereafter, anyone who wishes to testify about the proposed project will be afforded an opportunity.

So if you're planning to testify via Zoom, please take time now to verify that your computer microphone is active and click on the hand icon on your zoom control panel.

This will signal to the staff that you would like to speak, and when your hand is raised, it will be blue.

If you're calling into the meeting and would like to testify, please dial star nine to raise your hand.

And when I call for all testimony, staff will announce your name and allow you to talk.

You must unmute your microphone and your webcam will not be active.

If you're planning to testify in person at the boardroom, please line up behind the podium after the presentation is concluded, and we will call on you.

In an effort to accommodate all who would like to speak about this proposal, each person will give it a be given up to two minutes to comment.

BPA staff will indicate when 30 seconds remain.

And at that time, please conclude your remarks so that the hearing may continue and others may be heard.

Finally, the proponents are allowed a period of five to 10 minutes for rebuttal if they desire.

Open public meeting law requires that we ask if there's anyone in the audience who's recording this meeting.

So if you're recording this meeting, please identify yourself now.

Hearing and seeing none.

Also, please note that there are no demonstrations of approval or disapproval for members of the public during the meeting.

Zoe, please begin the presentation.

Thank you, and good evening, Chair Rojas, members of the board, and Director Shen.

My name is Zoe Duval, and I'm a project manager in the development review division of the planning department.

We are here before you this evening to discuss the proposed 776 Summer Street Phase 2 project and all related actions.

The project site is located within approved plan development area, number 128 L Street Station Redevelopment 776 Summer Street, which consists of a 15.2 acre site in the South Boston neighborhood of Boston.

The existing site consists of developed and formerly industrial land along the reserve channel containing the former Edison Power Plant structures.

It's bounded by the West on the west by Summer Street, on the south by East First Street and Medal of Honor Park, on the east by an MBTA parcel of land, and on the north by the Reserve Channel and Thomas Butler Freight Corridor.

The site areas encompassing the phase two project includes three buildings on the portion of the PDA site located along East First Street at the corner of East First Street and Summer Street, as well as a building on the north side of the site along the reserve channel and freight corridor.

A PDA master plan for the site was approved by this board on January 14th, 2021.

Subsequently, the PDA development plan and Article 80B Large Project for phase one was approved on January 19th, 2023.

The vote before you today is to consider an amendment to the PDA master plan as well as approval of the PDA Development Plan and Article 80B Large Project for Phase 2.

The phase two consists of approximately 6.8 acres and includes over 1 million square feet of residential, commercial, and hotel uses across four buildings with activated ground floors that includes a mix of retail, conference, cultural, and amenity spaces.

The commercial building block C includes one 330,000 square foot building.

Residential buildings on block A and B include one 193,500 square foot building and one 197,000 square foot building.

And the hotel building on block E includes one 305,000 square foot building connected to the existing 1898 turbine hall.

The PDA master plan amendment proposes to swap certain building uses, establish new maximum building heights and gross floor area, clarify affordable housing commitments, and clarify the timing and delivery of certain benefits consistent with the phase two project.

The proposed project has satisfied the necessary procedural and community process requirements of Article 80.

On September 27, 2024, the proponent filed a letter of intent and draft phase two PDA development plan with the planning department, initiating the first comment period that was extended to align with the phase two filing.

The members of the impact advisory group that had served during both the review of the Plan Development Area Development Plan and the Phase 1 project were given the opportunity to assist the planning department with the Article 80B large project and Article 80C amendment review of the phase two project.

A supplemental information document was filed for the project on January 17, 2025, which initiated a second comment period.

The comment period concluded the combined comment period concluded on February 20th, 2025.

The planning department hosted an IAG meeting on November 4th, 2024, and a public meeting on November 6, 2024 in connection with the PDA development plan and proposed amendment.

The planning department also hosted an IAG meeting on January 7, 2025, and a public meeting on February 3rd, 2025 in connection with the supplemental information document for the ADB portion of phase two.

Lastly, the planning department hosted a close-out IIG meeting on April 21st, 2026, and public meeting on May 5th, 2026.

These meetings were all held virtually on Zoom and were duly advertised, posted to the planning department's calendar, and email notification was sent to all subscribers of the planning department's South Boston neighborhood updates.

The project was introduced to the Boston Civic Design Commission on November 12, 2024, and considered again on February 4th, 2025, after the ADB filing, with design subcommittee meetings on February 18th, March 18th, April 22nd, May 20th, May 20th, 2025.

There was a final presentation to BCDC on June 3rd, 2025, and the BCDC approved the project at its July 1st, 2025 meeting.

Before I conclude, I want to note a couple of key project benefits that will be delivered with this phase of the project.

The development team has carried out substantial environmental remediation to restore the site to buildable conditions while preserving and adapting the historic Thomas Edison power plant structures.

They will provide a 400,000 payment to the transportation department in connection with phase two for the design and implementation of Vision Zero pedestrian improvements at four of the eight neighborhood intersections to be prioritized by the community.

The project will also include employment and apprenticeship opportunities by working with local organizations to promote jobs in the construction trades to local veterans as well as high school students.

The phase also includes the delivery of two acres of public open space, including waterfront activation along the reserve channel.

I would also like to clarify that this proposed project has approached the city to consider a payment in lieu of housing for a portion of the income restricted units at phase two.

At this time, however, no decisions have been made, and the housing component of the project before you remains consistent with the approved PDA master plan and compliant with the City of Boston's inclusionary development plan.

Any changes to this in the future would be subject to approval by the BPDA board and additional community process.

Lastly, I want to thank the members of the IAG who have been working on this project for the past five years.

We have held over a dozen meetings on the project and the PDA, and we sincerely appreciate their commitment.

I also want to thank the broader community for their participation in the review of the project and the South Boston delegation elected delegation and their staff for their continued review and advocacy.

A support letter from the South Boston elected delegation was received yesterday and shared with the board.

At this point, I would like to hand it off to my colleague Erin Stanley to present the planning context for the project, followed by a presentation from the development team.

Thank you.

Thank you, Zoe.

My name is Erin Stanley.

I'm a new planner on the comprehensive planning team, and I'll be presenting the planning and zoning context for this project.

As Zoe mentioned, some notable changes to this development plan proposal included a change in use or a change in location of the uses in the original master plan, swapping the residential and the commercial uses between block A and C.

The plan also proposes changes to building heights in order to better accommodate this swap of uses and adapt to the scale to surrounding developments, including the step adding stepbacks along East First Street.

The entire PDA master plan area of 776 Summer Street, outlined on the slide before you in black, is located in the South Boston Maritime Economy Reserve Subdistrict of the Harbor Park Zoning District.

Moving clockwise from the subject site, Conley Terminal and the MBTA's emergency power plant are situated to the east under the same zoning as the subject site.

To the southeast is the Meadow of Honor Park within an open space sub-district.

To the south, shown in yellow is developing and existing residential uses within the multifamily residential and multifamily residential local subdistrict, local services subdistrict.

To the west, is previously proposed office tech and lab uses within the local industrial subdistrict.

And finally to the northwest, shown in purple on the screen is the waterfront manufacturing subdistrict.

A small portion of the site, the northern portion of the site is also overlapped by seafraud and the FEMA flood hazard district or flood hazard area, and the entire site is in the restricted parking district or restricted parking overlay district.

Next slide.

So a variety of planning studies informed planning staff's review and support of the proposal before you today.

In 2011, East and West First Street Planning Study and Rezoning established First Street as a transition zone between residential and working waterfront uses and put in place the base zoning that we see today for the subject site and adjacent properties.

In 2017, the BPDA conducted a planning study known as the South Boston Edison Power Plant Planning Process Report.

This study outlined the street network for the subject site and how uses would connect to adjacent properties and uses.

Shown here in the top image, you can see the southwest corner of the site identified as a commercial row, and the southeast corner identified as a continuation of green space into the adjacent metal honor park.

In 2018, a South Boston coastal resilience planning study was conducted, which identified flooding potential in the northern part of the site, which is to be developed as waterfront open space and program open space and programming.

In 2023, the South Boston Strategic Seaport Strategic Transportation Plan was concluded, identifying Summer Street as a multimodal corridor with improvements needing needed at connecting streets to better serve this corridor.

And finally, the South Boston Transportation Action Plan is an ongoing plan that provides draft recommendations for First Street and Summer Street, including locations for additional transit connection points, cross-section designs, walkability studies, etc.

The proponent has coordinated their design improvements to First Street and Summer Street to meet recommendations in both these transportation plans, and is providing off-site mitigation that will improve unsafe intersections identified as priorities in this transportation action plan.

Thank you, and I will now hand off the presentation to the proponent to describe the proposal in more detail.

Thank you.

Thanks.

Good job.

Thank you, Erin.

Good evening, Chair Rojas, Vice Chair Shepard, Director Shen, and members of the board.

My name is Melissa Schrock.

I'm executive vice president of mixed use development at HRP Group.

I'm joined by several of my colleagues and our consultant team this evening.

On behalf of HRP and our partners at Redgate, we're very pleased to be with you this evening to present phase two of 776 summer.

Next slide, please.

Located in South Boston on the reserved channel, the site is adjacent to Conley Terminal and sits at the threshold between the rapidly redeveloping seaport and the thriving South Boston residential neighborhood.

Next slide, please.

The transformation of the site has been a long time coming.

Formerly a coal-fired power plant, once owned and operated by Thomas Edison himself.

The site has been cut off from the community for over 120 years.

The plant closed in 2006, but then sat dormant for a decade until we acquired it in 2016 and began permitting the master plan.

Between 2021 and 2024, we successfully abated and demolished the defunct plant while preserving four magnificent historic turbine halls that we look forward to opening to the public as the project is redeveloped.

As Zoe mentioned, we've held three IAG meetings, three public meetings, hosted public site tours, inviting our neighbors in to experience the unique history of the site during this phase two process.

We also held eight BCDC meetings and received unanimous approval from them last summer.

We're very grateful for all the excellent feedback we've received throughout the process from the community, city staff, local leaders, and elected officials, and it has helped to make our project a better project.

Next slide, please.

At full build, the project includes six new buildings and the four historic turbine halls, new roadways and open spaces, including a waterfront promenade and the Edison Plaza with a new section of the harbor walk, all connected to the existing park resources in the neighborhood.

Next slide, please.

The phase one, approved in 2023, contains two new commercial buildings, blocks D and F that you can see here in blue, and the adapted reuse of the three Edison turbine halls down the middle of the site.

Next slide.

The phase two before you today contains three residential buildings with up to 636 units, including 16% affordable and workforce units, a hotel involving the adaptive reuse of the 1898 turbine hall, and a commercial building at the summer at the corner of summer and east first streets.

This phase also includes two acres of open space, new streets inside the site, and extensive public realm improvements to both sides of the existing East First Street.

Next slide, please.

Now I'll just walk you briefly around the phase two components.

Here you can see block A, located at the corner of M and East First Streets across from Christopher Lee Playground.

It's planned as a seven-story residential building with up to 220 units.

It has a masonry base and design elements that reflect the surrounding urban context.

Next slide.

And on the opposite corner, block B is a 10-story building with approximately 250 units.

Its massing relates to both the adjacent Turbine Hall 3, you can see in the image, as well as to the existing residential buildings across the street with a setback on East First Street that pushes the bulk of the mass into the site and away from the neighborhood.

Next slide.

At the corner of summer in East First Street, block C is a commercial building, again, with a setback from the neighborhood on East First Street and an active ground plane to help guide pedestrians into turbine alley, a pedestrian-only path that leads from the neighborhood and down to the waterfront.

Next slide.

And finally, block E is a combined residential and hotel building designed with a warm colored facade elements facing the neighborhood and connected to the 1898 building.

Next, which will be preserved and adaptively reused as part of the hotel component, housing the hotel lobby, the lobby bar, and event spaces, such as a ballroom overlooking the waterfront on the north side of the building.

Next slide.

With phase two, we'll also deliver animating public realm components inside the site, such as this pocket park at the northeast corner of block B, which connects down to turbine halls that you can see in the image, as well as leads people across the street.

Next slide, please.

To the Edison Plaza, nestled between blocks E and F, providing a green connection from the neighborhood and guiding folks down to the waterfront.

Next slide, please.

And lastly, at the northern end of block E and the 1898 building, we'll deliver this dynamic waterfront overlook, emphasizing the beauty of these historic structures and providing an outdoor space for events.

Next slide, please.

From a sustainability perspective, the phase two project is designed to align with the city of Boston's carbon neutrality and climate-ready goals.

The residential buildings will be all electric, passive house certified, and will achieve at least LEED Silver.

The Block C commercial building will achieve LEED gold, and we're committed to achieving lead platinum on at least one of the buildings across the master plan site.

We've also committed to a hundred kilowatts of on-site renewable energy generation and are currently planning for that on a large PV array on block F, our largest building on site, which is part of phase one.

Next slide, please.

As we advance design, we're evaluating and incorporating a number of sustainable measures to reduce water and energy use, construction waste, and embodied carbon, and are considering health and environmental product declarations to ensure we select products that are healthy for the planet and the building users.

Next slide, please.

In terms of community impact, the project has so much to offer: a 74 million dollar investment in abatement, demolition, and remediation of the site, approximately 100 units of affordable and workforce housing, over 20 million dollars in housing and job linked payments, significant construction and permanent job creation, 20 million dollars in investment in the local community in the form of a scholarship fund, payments for improvements to adjacent City Point parks, internships, apprenticeships, job fairs, and free parking for South Boston residents.

Nearly six acres of open space, a new link in the harbor walk, substantial transportation and transit improvements both on site and in the surrounding neighborhood, and of course, the significant investment in the preservation of the turbine halls, which contains civic space for the community and a historic interpretive plan that celebrates the amazing history of this site.

Next slide, please.

If we're fortunate enough to receive the board's approval this evening, we look forward to beginning the transformation of this former industrial site into a mixed-use community integrated into the surrounding neighborhood, providing waterfront access, community amenities, and offering new economic opportunities.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Okay, so since this is a public hearing, we're going to take public testimony first.

So if you'd like to test by in person, please step up to the podium and announce your name, affiliation, and your position on the proposed project when you're called to speak.

If you're on Zoom and would like to testify, please raise your virtual hand.

And Madam Chair, members of the board, Director Shen.

My name is Tom Ward.

I'm the vice president of the Iron Workers Union.

I live in the city.

This is a very familiar sight to me and to many of us in this room.

We drive by and shake our heads at this project at a lack of development.

So I'd like to thank the developers, the team here today.

I don't know how long ago now, but I was with it for it then and I'm for it now.

Um it's time to build.

It's quite impressive that the community concern package that they've developed here.

And um I rise in favor.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Good afternoon, Madam Chair, members of the board, Director Shen.

My name is Daniel Daly.

I'm a lifelong Boston resident.

I'm also a business representative for local 103 with the electricians.

And uh just to echo what Tom said, this is a great project, ready to go.

It is is taking a blighted site and making it a destination in our city, and I'm in full support of this project.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Madam Chair, members of the board, Director Shed, my name's Mark Delasio.

I'm a business agent for the Captain's local 327 in Boston.

And uh like my colleagues before, uh we I represent a lot of hard working carpenters that live and work in the city of Boston, and the this project here will create much needed jobs for our members.

Uh I want to commend the development team for their commitment to responsible development, and uh we're in favor of this project.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Uh, anybody else in the room that like testify?

Yes, thank you, Madam Chair, uh Guy Rossman.

If you could please unmute yourself.

Hi, yes.

Uh, my name is Guy Rossman.

I'm uh a resident of the city of Boston with United Here Local 26th Hotel Workers, and just want to say and get on record that we are in strong support of this project.

Thank you.

Thank you, Mr.

Rossman.

Uh Brian Putney, would you please unmute yourself?

Hello.

Um I am Brian Putney.

I appreciate the members of the board, Madam Chair, for allowing us to speak today.

I am uh member of the South Boston community, have been with my family for the past decade, and just wanted to express my support of this project and everything it's doing to the surrounding area.

Thank you.

Thank you, Mr.

Putney.

Mary Fiske, would you please unmute yourself?

Yes, good evening.

Thank you so much for this opportunity to speak in support of this program, this development.

Um, I am a South Boston resident.

Uh actually I live on M Street very close.

So I'm speaking as a resident lifelong of South Boston, but also as a longtime member of the nonprofit community in South Boston.

Um, this development team has been extremely responsive to the community, to the needs of the community, especially the nonprofit providers.

And uh we are I'm speaking for myself, but also the South Boston Neighborhood House.

We are very much in favor, and I thank you for this opportunity to speak.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Stephen Lynch, would you please unmute yourself?

Yeah.

Hello there, can you hear me?

Yes, yes, Mr.

Lynch.

Okay, thank you.

We have Steve Lynch, I'm the United States Congressman for the eighth congressional districts.

Uh I live uh in South Boston.

I've been to many, many, many of the public uh meetings on this.

I think the city's done a great job in providing access to neighbors and giving them, you know, full voice in terms of what they'd like to see here.

I think the yen project represents uh the the wishes of the community.

I think the developers done a nice job in listening and trying to turn those ideas into reality.

Uh I'm old enough to remember uh, you know, this plant uh when it uh burned oil, uh, even before that it burned coal.

So this was a coal-fired power plant, probably with the last one in the city.

Um we've had a lot of uh lingering health effects under that, you know, in that iteration.

Uh, this is a refreshing change.

Uh there are 636 units of of uh housing here, including a hundred uh below market and affordable units.

Uh there's open space here, and there's something for everyone.

It's got a PLA on it.

So uh Project Labor Agreement, which allows uh our unions to be involved here 100%, creates uh apprenticeship opportunities for uh everyone in the city, men and women across the city.

So it's it's something we desperately need right now.

So I just I just want to say I'm in favor of this.

I also submitted a letter of support with uh Councillor Flynn with uh Senator Collins and Representative Beal that I think you got yesterday or maybe today.

Um, and uh that that articulates further my my support, but I think this is a great great project.

Uh it's like I say, it's a it's a big site, it'll be transformational for this whole area.

So I just respectfully urge you to vote favorably on their uh their petition.

Thank you.

Thank you, Congressman.

And just to confirm, we did receive um those those letters.

Thank you.

Thank you, Congressman Mary Brown.

Would you please unmute yourself?

Hi, yes, this is uh Mary Brown.

I'm a resident and homeowner here in South Boston.

I'm raising my family here as well.

Um we're active prisoners in the Gate of Heaven community as well, and we're very much uh in support of this project and looking forward to seeing it get off the ground, and it'll be transformative for the families in the area, and we're we're very much looking forward to it.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you.

Um is there anybody else who would like to offer testimony here in the room or online?

Would you please raise your hand?

Uh Eileen Smith, would you please unmute yourself?

Hi, um, good afternoon, everyone.

Uh my name is Eileen Smith, lifelong resident.

I live at 776 East Broadway.

I have been an active IAG member, uh, participating in every step of this project.

Yes, I believe that um it is time to go forward.

However, um there has been a lot of work that has gone into this project with the IAT members, and some concerns, of course, still exist, and I don't mean to um you know be the disappointing conversation, but you know, I I Melissa uh Shroff spoke earlier, and I just want to clarify we are going to have free parking for South Boston residents, hello.

However, those um are not full-time parking spaces.

So, you know, just to clarify for the purposes of the record that community benefit that would be helpful, and also um like uh Congressman Munch, I remember the days when we hung out on laundry, and our laundry came in with holes uh from hanging outside from the coal garning.

So, yes, it is going to be very beneficial, and it also is going to be very difficult for uh the massive amounts of construction and the other um uh issue.

You know, we have done a lot with the changing of the buildings, making them all in a residential area, which was a very big um suggestion, and and the IAG members seemed to be in agreement, and we do have of course down the road more uh opportunities to work with other buildings, but the residential units which is necessary for the project to proceed are also something that is uh leaving um issues uh for some of the IAG members with the uh the promise of affordability.

I have a stop.

Thank you, Ms.

Smith.

Uh is there anybody else in the audience?

Please raise your virtual hand.

Pilar Wingle, would you please unmute yourself?

Yes, hi, I'm Pilar Wingle.

I'm a resident in the South Boston committee.

Um, and I just wanted to say that I think now more than ever, especially with the World Cup, we're seeing Boston come together, and we're really seeing this community unify and rally around visitors and around new opportunities.

And I think this project specifically is very quintessentially Boston with its both modern features and honoring you know the historic neighborhood and and the historic features of the land.

And so I think it's important that this goes through.

And speaking as a younger South Boston resident, um, I I am in support.

Thank you very much, Ms.

Wingle.

Anybody else who would like to offer testimony?

Please raise your virtual hand, Madam Chair.

This concludes the testimony.

Okay, thank you.

Um, okay, we'll move to questions and comments from the board.

So any questions or comments from the board.

I just wanted to clarify.

Um the first slide that sort of delineated the affordable units.

Um I think it was a hundred out of the 636, and there was a reference to the possibility that the developer may want to swap some on site for a linkage payment.

Is that right?

No, no, okay.

So can just clarify what that what that was.

Hi, good evening.

Our development review team.

So yes, there is a reference to that on the site.

Um, and as stated in the board memo currently, the project intends to comply with IDP.

The component that you're referencing about the offsite sort of units is something that the city has been requested to consider by the proponent.

It was also shared with the IAP in a public meeting.

Um, but because we were not able to sort of make a decision and sort of get to consensus on that specific topic with colleagues in MOH and with others in the community, we've decided to sort of defer that specific decision to a future date.

And so for the moment, the project will remain compliant with IDP.

It's locked in at sort of 16% from the 2021 master plan, and that number is being carried forward as well as that sort of full commitment.

Um, and then in the future, if there is to be any decision about changing the strategy around that, it will be subject to additional process as well as a vote from the board.

Okay, great.

And so the the 8.9 housing linkage bullet.

Is that that's in addition to the 104 affordable units?

That's correct.

Okay, perfect.

Yeah, from the commercial stuff.

Okay, thank you.

I appreciate it.

I appreciate the um the treatment of the historical features.

I think it's um it looks really good and it's a great example of reuse of those structures.

Thank you.

Okay, just want to make a comment.

Um, would like to definitely thank your team for everything you've done from the planning board as well as development team.

Um, this is great to see um an area that was not utilized since 2006, as I saw.

Um, you know, it's great to be able to see potential tradespeople going to work, another crane in the sky in the city of Boston, and that's important.

So thank you very much for everyone and everything you've all done.

Okay.

Um yeah, and I don't I don't have any questions or anything, just a comment on um, I just want to, you know, recognize that you know we have received all of the the comments and you know, have noted the um, you know, the um still that that tension on the you know affordable housing and and where it's gonna be.

Um, but I do want to confirm that um that this vote does not change any of that, and that um again, as new poor said, uh, you know, if there is a change to that, that will go be subject to a board vote and be subject to more community process.

So um, I just want to make sure that people know that they've heard and that there's you know at the moment nothing that's that's changing.

So um with that, if you have any more questions or comments, okay.

Hearing and seeing none, a motion is in order.

So moved.

Second.

Uh all those in favor, aye, opposed.

Uh the ayes have it.

Uh motion passes.

Um good luck moving forward.

Thank you.

Okay.

Oh my gosh, hi.

Sorry.

I haven't seen you in like 10 years.

It's amazing.

Take care.

All right.

Are you there?

She's a good friend.

A while ago.

All right.

Okay, so item number 24.

We have the contractual payments.

I now need a motion to pay our bills.

I move that we pay our bills.

Second.

Okay.

Roll.

Oh, no, no roll call.

All those in favor.

Aye.

Oppose, the ayes have it.

Please pay bills.

And uh item number 25, director's remark.

Director Shen the deployers.

Good evening, members of the board.

Um I want to start my report and with a summary of the projects that was approved.

Um there were five new development projects amounting to a 1.5 million square foot that will deliver 763 new residential units, of which 104 of them will be all will be income restricted.

Um the total development cost and investment of these projects will be approximately 1 billion dollars when built.

A billion dollars.

Just to make sure I got the VP.

And these projects will put approximately 1,250 tradespeople to work and create 1,193 direct jobs and another 630 indirect jobs.

I want to highlight two of the approvals.

The uh starting with 776 uh summer street, which is the phase two of a multi-phase uh plant development area, that is the redevelopment of the former Edison Power Plant in the South Boston waterfront.

Um, this second phase that was approved will include four buildings, of which two of them will be uh completely residential, that will deliver 636 new residential units.

16%, as you heard, will be dedicated to income restricted units.

Um, and even though we have not finalized with the development team how they'll meet their IDP requirement, there is a commitment that they will return to the board when those that plan is clear.

Um, of course, there will be another new hotel, hotel and residential uh building, and then a commercial building that would be part of this approval.

Um the important part is that this approval will be an important step in um having developers be able to actually put their uh to put their um to continue their uh search for financing.

Um critical because there's been over 70 million dollars invested in just the remediation and cleanup of the site.

Um, not to mention that when built, that there will be as part of this phase uh two acres of open space uh as well as improved uh public realm sidewalks and roadways.

Uh, one of the most important community benefits, I think you heard tonight is that the project will provide job opportunities in the trades, specifically actually for local veterans and high school students.

Another project I want to uh emphasize is the last phase uh of the designation to the Garrison Trotter Neighborhood Association for the not the redevelopment but actually the greening of the 48 Townsend Street in Roxbury.

Uh currently the vacant land uh will be converted into a community garden uh that will provide opportunities to grow fresh food uh to address uh food insecurity in the in the community.

The garden will of course serve local residents, families, seniors, uh, and nearby students, and will host a variety of educational, cultural and recreational programs that reflect the diversity of that community.

Um they will also be hosting gardening workshop, healthy cooking demonstrations, cultural celebrations, and music performances and community gatherings.

This is a really good example of how the department is continuing to deploy public land for public good uh for the community.

Um we also had one certificate of completion at Alston Lab works uh along Western Avenue.

The benefits that deliver that were delivered by this project include 17,000 square foot of new open space and public realm improvements that will make it safer for bikers, pedestrians, including a protected bike lane.

There would also be a new MBTA bus station delivered as part of this project, and um 2,500 square foot of new civic space and the Nexus Learning Lab, which will host educational programs to teach local students and teachers about the life uh the life science industry as well as workforce seminars to make the community aware of these emerging job opportunities.

Um finally I want to end uh to share a um to talk a little bit about an event that happened here last night in this boardroom, which was the graduation ceremony for our first cohort of the planning academy.

Um there were over two dozens of um residents of the city that went through the program.

They spent eight weeks uh every Wednesday night uh from 6:30 to I think most of the time 10 o'clock uh working with our staff, really learning about um the basics of what um how to become participants, uh knowledgeable participants in our our planning and development processes.

Um this planning academy was part of the mayor's um intent and a critical component of how we we as uh as a city is changing the development and planning culture um in the city and and to actually expand the diversity of participants in the planning process.

Um critically, there in addition to sort of in expanding this pool of participants, it was also an opportunity for us to really raise the level of conversation by introducing the knowledge around the real estate industry, the imperative of our city uh that's so dependent on property tax values on why we have to manage growth and and you know why we're so dependent on growth.

Um but also um in this process, one of the interesting things we developed the staff developed a number of exercises for the for this for the participants to learn about the complexity of the planning process, and many of these exercises, the um students came up with very different answers, which actually is very endemic of the planning discussion because there's no right answer.

But along the way, the I think the most important part of the curriculum is to really have these participants understand that trade-offs are necessary and compromise is necessary if we're actually to accommodate growth.

Um, so we look forward.

I I told the uh graduates that uh now the easy part is over, the eight weeks is over, now they have committed themselves to a lifelong uh responsibility of participating in the planning processes, you know, in the in the real uh planning arena.

I want to thank the staff for all the staff that have worked very hard to put on this uh curriculum.

Um it's been a resounding success as far as we can tell.

And because we've had so many interested uh participants, I think we remember that uh for this first cohort we had over 400 applications.

We will be running another cohort starting in the fall.

So again, great achievement for the staff, and I hope that you get a chance to sort of um meet some of these new uh newly graduated uh citizens or active uh uh citizens that will participate in our planning process.

So I end my report and thank you again for all of your service.

Thank you, thank you, and welcome uh to the to the Planning club.

Yeah, uh, as uh as fellow lifelong like um uh commitment to the to the city.

Um, this is no, this is not an easy uh thing uh to to undertake and um so just uh really appreciate um all of those who participated, all those who will participate in the future.

Um I hope you'll find this as gratifying as um, you know, as we do uh in being just your neighbors participating as well.

So um yeah, with that, I need a motion to adjourn the meeting.

So moved.

Second.

Uh all those in favor.

Um opposed, the eyes have it.

Motion passes.

Um meeting adjourned.

Uh we'll see you next month.

Thank you.

Thank you.