Okay, uh excuse me, June, July 9th, uh 2026.

Uh Mr.

Lyman, can you please take the roll call?

Certainly.

Would the representative from the public works department please state their name for the record?

Property management department.

Please do the same.

Joseph Callahan.

Transportation Department.

40.

Water and Sewer Commission?

To me.

That one.

Commission for Persons with Disabilities.

Turn up.

I do not believe we have anybody from ISD, do we?

No, nobody from ISD, but we do have a quorum.

Okay.

We'll start with the hearing minutes.

Uh the request of the public improvement commission staff acceptance of the minutes of the public improvement commission hearing on June 25th, 2026.

We have a motion.

I'll make a motion to accept the minutes of June 25th, 2026.

Second.

And all in favor?

Aye.

Any opposed for abstained?

Hearing notes are moved.

Okay.

Moving to the public hearing.

Agenda item number one.

On a petition by Mahoney Development Group LLC for the making of specific repairs for the following public ways in Boston proper, consisting of curb sidewalk and pedestrian ramp reconstruction, as well as new and relocated storm drain infrastructure and groundwater recharge infrastructure.

Congress Street at address number 50, generally between exchange place and cause street.

Kilby, generally between exchange place and Hawes, and exchange place generally between Congress Street and Kilby as shown on a set of plans entitled City of Boston Public Works Department Engineering Division Specific Repair Plan, Exchange Place, Haw Street, Congress Street, Public Way, 50 Congress Street in Boston.

Four sheets dated May 4th, 2026.

We'll hand it over to the proponent.

Good morning.

I'm joined this morning by Sarah Kassanovich, also from Harvard St.

Hudson.

Todd or Ashley, would it be possible to give Sarah control to share her screen?

Yep, guard what's happening.

While the presentation is being pulled up, I can quickly give a quick recap of the project.

The project is located within the Crownwater overlay district.

And therefore, to comply with requirements of Article 32, the proponent is seeking to install a stonewater tank in the basement of the existing building, then out of which they will pump up and out and into injection wells within the uh public right away, which will be on the south side of the sidewalk on exchange place.

Uh Todd, I'm still not given the ability to share my screen.

Still nothing.

Okay, Todd, you're on mute.

I can try share if that helps, Todd.

Yeah, give it a yeah, see if you can give it a shot, James.

Sorry.

Yep.

Everyone's see that.

Oh, yep.

There we go.

Thank you.

Sorry, sir.

I don't know why it's not letting you know.

No, it's okay.

Yeah, it's just I can click share and then it won't do it, but that's fine.

Thank you, Jack.

Yeah, all good.

Uh so yeah.

So here's the location of the those two ejection wells.

The old lower flow into the uh Boston Works Sewer uh infrastructure.

Uh here's the ramp improvements at the corner of exchange and congress, and similarly over at uh Kilby um exchange place.

Uh so with that happy to answer any questions the commission public uh may have.

Great.

Thank you.

Any questions or comments uh Todd from your team?

No, I will take this opportunity to remind the public if you wish to ask questions or add testimony to any particular project.

Please use the raised hand function, which can be found at the reactions tab at the bottom of your screen.

Um case the staff does not have any comments at this time.

Um I believe we might have somebody in the hearing room 801 who may wish to speak.

Yeah, we're gonna do a quick mic check.

Can you hear the hearing room?

Yes, we can hear you loud and clear.

Right.

So if you want to introduce yourself, just make sure that's in a good place.

And you're also okay, Ann McKinnon.

Um I don't really have a comment on the proposed work.

My comment is procedural.

I was here a year ago, less than a year ago, asking about the uh legal notices.

They really need improvement.

First of all, I'm here because there's no indication that this could be done online.

I've taken time off work to come in to make this statement again.

The legal notices describe this project as doing specific repairs, and again I ask you how would you like it if you read in your in the newspaper that your street was going to be subject to specific repairs, which could be as in this case, new pedestrian ramps or repaving or repainting the pavement markings, or widening or removing parking.

Who knows what it means?

And I shouldn't have to come down here or participate in this meeting to find out that you're making an improvement to a pedestrian ramp.

So please, what would it take to improve the legal notices so that and I'm speaking for many others, so people know what the proposal is.

It was stated at the beginning of this hearing by Gove what this was.

That could be easily, in my opinion, could be easily added to the legal notice instead of specific repairs.

That means nothing to anybody.

So I request that you modify the legal notices to include a clue about what the project is about or what the uh what the action is.

Um apparently one can participate online.

There is no indication in the legal notices that that is a way to participate.

Um I guess I'm the only one who doesn't know that because I'm the only person here in the hearing room.

But if you're gonna bother, and I assume the proponent makes the pays for the ads.

If you're gonna bother with the ads, please tell people how they can participate.

During COVID, it was listed.

So I assume that you all went back to in-person gatherings.

It's a little stunning that even rep very few representatives from the city aren't even here.

So my request is simple.

I don't care about this project.

I would like to see the legal notices improved so they give more information for people like me in the public who want to know what's going on.

Thank you.

Great, thank you.

Appreciate the feedback.

Uh any other questions or comments from commissioners.

Yes, I just wanted to confirm what the project team that the um architectural access board variants has been submitted for the grant.

Uh, correct, it has been.

Yes, I believe I sent you an email, Sarah.

Um, and then the check was sent out early this week.

So also in their court.

Thank you.

Great.

Um, thank you.

Um I think um any um decision on this um application should be contingent upon um approval of that um variants.

Um, um uh record keeping.

Thank you.

Um I will just take this very brief opportunity to recognize uh Brian Ronin with ISD who has joined the hearing.

Um so he's representing IST here.

Thank you.

Any other questions or comments from commissioners?

Hearing none, do we have a motion?

Uh make a motion to approve a petition by Mahome Development Group LLC for the making of specific repairs within Congress Street, Kilby Street, exchange places right into the record by the chair.

Second.

All in favor.

Aye.

Any opposed troops stay?

Hearing none so moved.

Okay.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Agenda item number two on a joint petition by the City of Austin Public Works Department and the City of Austin Transportation Department.

For the making of specific repairs within the following public ways in Dorchester, consisting of curb realignment, roadway and sidewalk reconstruction, as well as new and relocated pedestrian ramps, street lighting infrastructure, storm water uh infrastructure driveway curb cuts and raised crosswalk.

Uh Mount Ida Road, uh generally Marie Street and Marie Street east of Mount Ida Road as shown on a set of plans of titled City of Boston Public Works Department Engineering Division Specific Repairs Plan.

Marie Street at Mount Ida Road at Dorchester eight sheets date of June 12th, 2026.

We'll hand it over to the proponent.

Good morning, Chair of the Commission.

My name is uh Thomas J.

with the Public Works Department.

Uh, here's this uh public hearing on the specific repairs at Marie Street and Ida Dorchester.

Um, also joined by our design call consultant, so sharing the screen for the plans from GPI.

Uh just as a quick background for everyone, this project is a subsection of our ramp repair program, specifically looking to address constituent requests for new crosswalks throughout Boston, uh, this specific location.

Um, we're looking to provide an accessible access point to the City of Boston Road and Park as requested by the public.

Uh and I'll let uh Dan take it away the plans if there's any specific questions.

Yep, just to reiterate what uh Thomas said, this was uh requested by the community to approve safety along this crosswalk, this crossing here to Roman Park.

Uh this is the same plan that was shown that new business about two weeks ago where we have not received any additional comments from communications with city with city departments or utilities.

Uh we're bumping out curves, we're approving drainage based on geometry design, and uh creating a race process uh pretty straightforward.

Uh I'll open it up to any questions.

Great, thank you.

Any questions from commissioners?

About PIC staff or members of the public.

Sorry, couldn't unmute myself.

Um Thomas, I believe last time we talked about um uh community meeting that was gonna be held.

Um would you mind just briefly discussing how that went?

Yep, correct.

Uh so we held a member or meeting with some of the members of the community, uh, specifically two members we were able to meet with.

Um they had some questions on general surrounding area.

We kind of uh tried to showcase how we were addressing their concerns, um, especially some safety issues.

Um we're looking to have a follow-up um organized with our uh the ONS uh reps in the area uh for a follow-up potentially on site uh just to kind of talk through the design, showcase how we're looking to address some of their concerns.

Um, but we don't expect any major impacts or changes to the design coming out of that.

Uh and that was uh that meeting.

Um, the next potential meeting would probably be in a couple weeks, but to be determined at as of yet when we got there to field with uh constituents.

Any other questions, John?

No, we're all set.

No, thank you.

Any other questions from commissions?

If not, do we have a motion?

I'll make a motion to approve a joint petition by the city of Boston Public Works Department and the City of Boston Transportation Department for the making of specific repairs in Maunida Road and Marie Street.

It's right into the writing by the chair.

Second.

All in favor?

Aye.

A.

Any opposed or obstacle?

Hearing none so moved.

Thank you.

All right, on to agenda item number three on a petition by 69 Kilmarnock Road Street properties LLC for the acceptance of the pedestrian easement adjacent to Kilmarnock Street public way, Boston proper located on southwesterly side.

Between 65 and 69, uh northwest of Queensbury Street, as shown on a set of plans entitled City of Boston Public Works Department of Engineering Division, pedestrian easement, plan 65 Kilmarnock Street, Public Road Fenway, one sheet dated October 17, 2025.

We'll hand it over to the proponent.

Good morning, Mr.

Chairman and uh Commission members.

Um, my name's Joe Capolino.

I'm the engineer and project manager from VHB.

I'm representing the proponent and the project team this morning.

Um, this is the easement plan for the project as described.

It's a residential project at the northwest corner of uh Queensbury Street and Kilmarnock Street.

Um this pedestrian easement is being uh provided on Kilmarnock Street to provide a wider um right of way for the uh pedestrians and um this geometry was coordinated coordinated directly with planning and uh and Todd.

Um uniquely to make sure that this curved corner um was provided to have a an easy passing um for pedestrians trying to travel uh westward on Queensbury.

Um so seeing there were no comments from new business, I'm I'm happy to answer questions, but um there have been no changes made to this plan since uh new business two weeks ago.

Great.

Thank you.

Any questions or comments from Commissioners?

Rob, how about the IC staff or members of the public?

Uh we're all set on the easement plan, and I don't see any raised hands.

Okay, we have a motion.

I'll make a motion to approve a district by 69 Kilmarnock Street properties LLC for the acceptance of pedestrian easement adjacent to Kilmardy Street.

It's right into our competitor.

Second.

All in favor?

Aye.

Aye.

Any opposed or abstained?

Hearing none so moved.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Okay, agenda item number five on petition by Monarch Development LLC for the making of specific repairs within East Broadway, public way in South Boston.

It's northerly side, addresses number 736 through 742, generally west of L Street, consisting of sidewalk reconstruction with structural soil as well as new and relocated street lighting infrastructure, street trees, and bike racks, as shown on a set of plants entitled City of Boston Public Works Department Engineering Division Specific Repair Plane, East Boston Public Way, 736 to 742 East Broadway and South Boston, one sheet dated May 27, 2020.

Mr.

Chair, I'm I'm sorry to interrupt.

Um I think we skipped agenda item number four, which is this specific repair for the same project.

Yep, apologies.

Uh all right, we'll jump back to number four.

Uh on a petition by 69 Kilmarnock Street uh property.

We'll see if the making of specific repairs within following public ways of Boston property consisting of crabberry alignment sidewalk Reconstruction with structural soil as well as relocated pedestrian ramps, street lighting infrastructure, street trees, landscaping, bike racks, driveway curb cuts, and wayfinding signs.

Uh Kilmarnock Street generally at addresses number sixty-five to sixty-nine northwest of Queensbury Street and Queensbury Street southwest of Kilmarnock Street as shown on a set of plans entitled City of Boston Public Works Department Engineering Division specific repair plan, 65 Kilmarnock Street, Kilmarnock Street and Queensbury Street, a public road in the Fenway.

Two sheets dated June 22nd, 2026.

Back to the proponent, apologies for the skipping of this.

Thanks for that.

So this specific repair plan we had made two minor changes based on comments we received either at new business hearing or from planning in between hearings.

So there are uh if you might recall or some of the documentation that's submitted, we did coordinate with planning to off-site seven um short-term bicycle racks, so 14 um spaces um to 125 Jersey Street or public way um in the vicinity of 125 Jersey Street, which is memorialized here on a schematic plan, but also um through a more in-depth planning document with field measurements and photos and orientations of racks and uh which has gone through planning and been approved.

Um the project is responsible for nine total short-term racks, so that would leave two on the site.

Um the plan that was presented last week had one rack um between the mailboxes um and this first street tree.

Um planning was really um adamant and prioritizing this um greenway for the furnish this green furnishing zone.

So we removed that bike rack, which you know would have had to be on a paved pad um for access requirements, um, and we moved that here to where there was already uh a bike rack plan.

So there are two racks um here.

Uh the first one is four feet from the um landscape area, which has an existing tree that we're maintaining.

And then this is uh again per the bike parking guidelines, eight feet away from the uh the first rack, and that's still four feet away from the apron.

And so we were able to fit those racks.

Um I uh submitted communications with the planning department um that memorialized this change and their acceptance of uh this plan.

Uh they did say they had no further comment in that um communication that I submitted.

Um, the second change was um based on this driveway apron as you uh pedestrian may be traveling um northward on Kilmarnock Street on the west side.

You would be um leaving our site, which now has uh a pedestrian easement and around a 10-foot uh clear walking zone to a more constricted um sidewalk based on the frontage uh and facade of 55 to 57 um Kilmarnock or the Fenway used condominiums.

Um, currently there's this um radial stone that's probably sloped um in the field to make this kind of flush, but also I would assume uh uh visually you can tell it would not meet ADA cross slope requirements.

Um so we kind of looked into how to um fix that.

Um and then as I was looking into that, there is uh there are some direct access units on the ground floor here, and there is a gate that swings inward um for the residents to use.

So the gate does not swing outward.

But um what we decided to do is really look at this, um, the topography here that we have in detail, um, and realize that this apron isn't um providing a six-inch delta from the street level to um the level sidewalk.

Uh it isn't now and it won't in future conditions.

Um so what we did was kind of limit the size of the apron um based on the design slope in the city details for a res um this is the residential um driveway detail for this um alleyway um to kind of limit that width to provide a four-foot flush um zone to get through to the sidewalk here, which is an improvement versus what is out there today.

And I think it's a base best case scenario as far as accessibility requirements and cross slopes and whatnot.

And so part of this stone will be flush with the sidewalk above, and the apron will be able to be limited to about two feet wide here instead of the three foot ten.

That's on the detail because just based on the vertical delta we're dealing with here.

So that that is a change that was made, and if there are any questions, I'm happy to answer them.

Any questions or comments from the commission?

Yeah, for that for that driveway, right?

Like appreciate the dimensions there, but uh if instead of having curved corners, we could just have slopestone so that we're not introducing granite into the right.

Like I understand that the intent here is to be flush, uh, but it's still right, and the different material there in that corner.

So if that four foot path could be continuous cement concrete, that would be desirable to have slowstones and not curb.

So when you mean slope zones, you mean like a transitional.

So what I discovered, I did look at that, Amy, and and sorry to sketch during a public hearing, but if this was to slope at all, um you would need a transitional panel, and then I felt that that wasn't appropriate for residents to walk out into, where in this scenario, everything behind the curb is level, so like you know, residents are using that direct access pad.

I mean, I'm happy to do that, but I I did not want to introduce like a uh an extreme cross slope on a on a um panel here that you know residents would step into, um, and it would really it would really eat into that width because there's no way to have anything sloping here that's not gonna cause this width of level area to be reduced, even if it's even if it's smaller, you know.

I mean, um, so I was more comfortable with this.

I'd be happy to change it for you.

Um, uh no, actually, I will defer to Sarah.

Um, yeah, no, I I see what you've done there.

Um, right, like with the entrance, I guess that's uh additional complicating factor.

Um, yeah, I think without the gate there, it that's probably would have been the better way to go.

And again, it's we Sarah I'm happy to take your comment, but I thought this was more appropriate for because of that um direct and those direct entry units here.

Yeah, it sounds like you're you have a lot of complicating uh factors, including um the entry in into the other building, which um we don't want to impact um as much as humanly possible.

Um so I think we're okay with the approach given um given as proposed, um, although recognizing a material change um could influence kind of the maintenance um ongoing, but I think um as proposed, um it makes sense just due to the door and the need for a level landing outside that gate.

Appreciate that, thank you.

Any other questions or comments from the commission?

Well, PIC staff or members of the public.

Uh we're all set with this.

Uh I know Chung is actively working with the project's attorney on the legal agreements for this.

Um, they're not finalized yet, but um they're working towards that, so uh those should be good relatively soon.

Any other questions from commissioners?

And if not, do we have a motion?

I'll make a motion to approve a condition by 69 kilometer street properties LC for the making of specific repairs in Kilmodic Street and Queen Street Street as reading to the record by the chair.

Second.

All in favor?

I think.

Any closed group state.

Hearing none so moved.

Thank you.

Thank you, everybody.

Okay.

Uh back to uh agenda item number five.

On a petition by Monarch Development LLC for the making of specific repairs within East Broadway Public Way in South Boston located on its northerly side.

Address is number 736 to 742, generally west of L Street, consisting of sidewalk reconstruction with structural soil as well as new and relocated lighting infrastructure.

Street trees and bike racks as shown on a set of plans at titled City of Boston Public Works Department Engineering Division, specific repair plan in East Boston Public Way 736 to 742 East Broadway in South Boston.

One sheet date of May 27th, 2026.

We'll hand it over to the proponent.

Thank you.

Good morning, Mr.

Chairman and members of the Commission.

Joe Connolly, project engineer with Howard Stein Hudson.

I am presenting today on behalf of the proponent Monarch Development, and I'm joined by Ryan Speaker with ownership.

The project is located at 736 to 742 East Broadway in South Boston.

It is founded by New Hill Place and a private parcel to the rear, private parcels to the east and west, and East Broadway to the south.

The project involves the demolition of an existing three-story mixed-use building to allow for the construction of a four-story mixed-use building providing approximately 10 additional residential units for a total of 12 proposed.

Ground floor commercial space and a six-base surface parking lot accessed from New Hill Place at the rear.

The proposed work within the East Broadway right of way.

So with that, I'm happy to answer any questions.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Any questions or comments from the commission?

Hello.

We sent over comments a couple days ago just to wrap a couple of things up on some ramp rating.

There's no ramps in our design.

Sorry, this is East Broadway.

I'm so sorry, I thought this was E Street.

Sorry, I thought this was 743 E.

So sorry.

Any other questions?

How about Todd BIC staff or members of the public?

Um I will just mention that Amy Cording with BTD had to step out.

So we are down one commission member, but we do still have a quorum.

Um my team and I do not have any comments or questions on this on this action, so we're all set for now.

Any other questions or comments?

From members of the commission.

Hearing none, is there a motion?

I move to approve a petition by Monarch Development LLC for the making of specific repairs within East Broadway Street as further read into the record by the chair.

I can all in favor.

Aye.

Aye.

Any opposed or abstained.

Hearing none, so moved.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Okay.

Uh agenda item number six.

Uh, on a petition by Monarch Development LLC for the granting of a projection license for the installation of a canopy over a portion of the sidewalk within East Broadway, a public way in South Boston, located on its northeast side at addresses number 736 to 742, generally west of L Street, as shown on a set of plans entitled City of Boston Public Works Department Engineering Division License Plan East Broadway Public Way 736 to 742 East Broadway in South Boston, one sheet dated May 27, 2026.

We'll hand it over to the proponent.

Thank you.

Good morning again.

My name is Joe Connolly, Project Engineer with Outstein Hudson.

Presenting today on behalf of the proponent, Monarch Development.

I am joined by Ryan Speaker of Ownership.

The project is located at 736 742 East Broadway in South Boston, founded by New Hill Place to the rear, private parcels to the east and west, and East Broadway to the south.

Project involves the demolition of an existing building to make way for a new four-story mixed use containing 12 residential units, ground floor commercial space, and six spaces of surface sparking accessed from New Wheel Place at the rear.

The proponent is seeking a projection license along East Broadway to allow for the installation of a canopy along the side of the building.

The canopy extends over the public way, distance of approximately three feet four inches to three feet two inches for a length of 50 feet 8 inches.

We have not received any comments on this plan from any city agencies, and all have reviewed the plan shown here at this time.

So with that, I will open it up to any questions again.

Any questions or comments from commission members?

How about PIC staff or members of the public?

All set on the canopy license.

Okay.

Is there a motion?

I move to approve a petition by Monarch Development LLC for the granting of a projection license.

Within East Broadway Street as further read into the record by the chair.

Second.

All in favor?

Aye.

Aye.

Aye.

Any opposed or abstain.

Hearing none, so moved.

Thank you.

On a petition by Northeastern University for the widening and relocation of the existing right-of-way lines in a public alley number 823, a public way in Roxbury, as well as for the acceptance of a highway easement located on its southwesterly side at the site of 238 to 262 St.

Boltoff Street, generally southeast of St.

Boltoff Street, as shown on a plan entitled City of Boston Public Works Department Engineering Division Widening and Relocation Public Alley number 823, a public way 238 to 262 St.

Boltoff Street in Roxbury, one sheet dated July 7th, 2026.

We'll hand it over to the proponent.

Good morning to the chair, PIC Commission members.

My name is Jeffrey Pelot, Samuel's consultants.

We are the civil engineer on the project.

I'm joined today by the design team at Northeastern University representatives.

We are respectively petitioning for the winding and relocation of the existing right-of-way lines for public alley 823 as shown on this plan.

We have received comments to update the title block for this plan, which you can see here.

Otherwise, there are no other comments and are available for any questions or comments from the public or commission.

Thank you.

Any questions from the commission?

Sorry, I was on mute there.

Any questions from the commission?

How about the IC or members of the public?

All set on this.

We have a motion.

I move to approve a petition by Northeastern University for the widening and relocation of the existing right of way lines of public alley number eight twenty-three as further read into the record by the chair.

Second.

All in favor?

Aye.

Aye.

Any opposed or abstained?

Hearing none so moved.

Okay, agenda item number eight.

On a joint petition by Northeastern University and the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority for the abandonment of any and all rights to travel the public way.

May have had within the entirety of private alley number eight sixteen a private way open to the public for travel in Roxbury from St.

Boltoff Street to its southeasterly terminus.

As shown on a plan titled City of Boston Public Works Department, Engineering Division Abandonment Plan, Private Alley number 816, 238 to 262 St.

Boltoff Street, Roxbury, one sheet dated June 11th, 2026.

We'll hand it over to the proponent.

Good morning again to the commission and chair this morning.

We are petitioning for abandonment of all any all rights of uh to travel the public may have had on the 10-foot public alley 816 along St.

Boltoff Boston proper between Gainesborough and Terminus uh approximately 60 feet northeasterly.

There have been no additional comments from new business.

Uh any questions or comments from the commission or public.

Thank you.

Questions from commissioners.

Staff or members of the public.

I'll sign on the abandonment.

We have a motion.

I move to approve a joint petition by Northeastern University in the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority for the abandonment of many and all rights to travel.

The public may have had within the entirety of private alley number 816.

As further edited to the record by the chair.

Second.

All in favor?

Aye.

Aye.

Opposed or abstained.

Hearing none so moved.

Okay.

Agenda item number nine on a petition by Northeastern University for the acceptance of three pedestrian easements adjacent to the following public ways in Roxbury.

St.

Boltoff Street on its southeasterly side at addresses number 238 to 262 between Gainesborough Street and Public Alley number 823.

Gainesborough Street on its northeasterly side, southeast of St.

Boltoff Street, public alley number 823 on its southwesterly side, southeast of St.

Boltoff Street.

As shown on a set of plans entitled City of Boston Public Works Department Engineering Division Pedestrian Eastern Plan, Gainesborough Street, St.

Boltoff Street, Public Way 238 to 262 St.

Boltoff Street, Roxbury, one sheet, dated June 11, 2026.

We'll hand it over to the proponent.

Good morning to the chair and commission again.

My name is Jeffrey Pelot, Sammy O's Consultants.

We're the civil engineer on the project.

We are looking for acceptance of the proposed easements for pedestrian access along Gainesborough Street, St.

Boltoff, Public Alley 823.

There have been no additional comments from new business meeting.

Any questions or comments from Commission members?

About PIC staff or members of the public.

Easements look good, we're all set.

We have a motion.

I move to approve a petition by Northeastern University for the acceptance of three pedestrian easements in the area of St.

Patal Street, Gainesborough Street, and Public Alley number 823.

As further read into the record by the chair.

Second.

All in favor.

Aye.

Aye.

All any opposed or abstained.

Hearing none, so moved.

Okay.

Last public hearing agenda item number 10.

On a petition by Northeastern University for the making of specific repairs within the following public ways in Roxbury, consisting of curb realignment, roadway and sidewalk reconstruction with structural soil, as well as new and relocated pedestrian ramps, specialty pavements, street lighting infrastructure, stormwater, stormwater infrastructure, street trees, landscaping, ballards, bike racks, utility covers, driveway curb cuts, and a bike share station.

St.

Boltoff Street, generally at addresses number 238 to 262 between Gainesborough Street and Public Alley number 823, Gainesborough Street, southeast of St.

Boltoff Street, and Public Alley number 823 823, southeast of St.

Boltoff Street, as shown on a set of plans entitled City of Austin Public Works Department Engineering Division, specific repairs plan, Northeast, Northeastern Masses Arena, 262 St.

Boltoff Street, Gainesboro Street, St.

Boltoff Street, Public Alley 823, and Roxbury 10 Sheets dated March 20th, 2026, as revised on June 11th, 2026.

We'll hand it over to the proponent.

Good morning to the chair and commission members again.

My name is Jeffrey Pelott, Sam Yous Consultants for the Civil Project Engineer.

We are looking for permission to make specific repairs, including replacement of 467 linear feet of concrete sidewalk, relocation of light poles, closing of existing curb along St.

Boltoff, replacement of approximately 196 linear feet of concrete sidewalk, closing of existing curb cuts, relocation of light poles, reconfiguration of approximately 208 linear feet of existing curve along Gainesboro, and reconfiguration of approximately 228 linear feet in new driveway curb along public alley twenty-three.

If there are any other questions or comments, please let me know.

Thank you.

Any questions or comments from the commission?

About the IC staff or members of the public.

We are all set on the specific repairs.

Okay, do we have a motion?

I move to approve a petition by Northeastern University for the making of specific repairs in the area of St.

Patal Street, Gainesborough Street, and Public Alley number 823.

That's further read into the record by the chair.

All in favor?

I.

Aye.

Aye.

Opposed or abstained?

Hearing none, so moved.

Thank you very much.

Thank you, Commissioners.

It's going to conclude our public hearing today.

Todd, I'm going to kick it over to you for our approach to new business this week.

Sure.

So because of a situation which is going to be demanding the immediate attention of multiple commission members, we are going to run through our four new business items very quickly.

So we're going to actually suspend presentations and conversations on each project until August 6th.

So what uh the chair is going to do is just read these projects into the record.

We'll have the project team just introduce themselves very, very briefly, and then we will declare the public hearing date, and then move on to the next one.

Apologize to everybody for having to go through this quickly, but like I said, it's a little bit of an unfortunate situation that we're going to be have to be having to deal with.

So go ahead, Nick.

Please take it away.

Thank you, Todd.

Todd, can you just confirm the date for these?

August 6th.

Okay.

Again, thank you for everybody's patience, given the circumstances here.

So new business item number one, Washington Street, Summer Street, Tremor Street, Winter Street, Boston Proper Specific Repairs on a petition by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.

New business item number two, one Harbor Street in South Boston, the pedestrian used in specific repairs on a set of joint petitions by Vertex Pharmaceuticals and the Economic Development and Industrial Corporation of Boston.

New business item number three, General Lawrence, J.

Logan Way, Colonel Michael J.

McDonough, Strandway, General William H.

Divineway, and South Boston Highway, discontinuance abandonment, widening relocation extensions, line and grade approval, pedestrian easements, specific repairs on a set of joint petitions by MEM Building C L L C in the Boston Housing Authority, and new business uh agenda item number four, nine Chelsea Street, Maverick Street, Bremen Street, East Boston, recision of approved specific repairs, projection license at the request of the public improvement commission staff, and upon consent by the owners, all said will be heard uh on August 6, 2026, as mentioned uh by Todd.

Any questions uh from the commission?

Uh, and if not, do we have a motion to adjourn?

I make the motion to adjourn.

Second.

All in favor.

I adjourn.

Thank you, everyone.

Thanks, folks.

Thank you.

Project teams, I will check in with you offline um to discuss any questions that you might have.

Great, thanks, Todd.

Records, I think, and I think that's a good one.