OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Bozeman Study Commission Meeting: Governance Structure & Survey Results - Jan 15, 2026

City CommissionThursday, January 15, 2026
BodyBozeman, Montana
SessionCity Commission
DateThursday, January 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:11:24

Transcript — Verbatim
1:42

One minute morning.

2:20

Can I show that on your test?

2:23

Are you there?

2:25

Hey, Barbara.

2:28

Just tested.

2:29

I I can hear Mike, but everybody else is really far away.

2:33

They haven't turned their microphone.

2:35

That's because we have our microphones on.

2:37

Okay.

2:38

Do you microphones are absolutely critical when you're on Zoom?

2:41

I now have understood.

2:43

Yes.

2:44

Yes.

2:45

Do you have a camera?

2:47

Because we can't see you if you think you can be seen.

2:50

Oh, hi.

2:52

Okay.

2:53

Mike, are you ready?

3:02

I'll call to order the study commission of Bozeman meeting of January fifteenth, twenty twenty six and ask all who were able to please stand for the pledge of allegiance and then a moment of silence.

3:17

You can be seated for the moment of silence.

4:43

Seeing none, is there any online?

4:45

Public comment.

5:01

Second.

5:03

Any public comment?

5:06

Since it's a consent agenda, we don't discuss it unless someone wants to pull something from that agenda.

5:13

May I ask a question?

5:15

Should we acknowledge the minutes or not a part of the record that normally goes into a consent agenda?

5:23

The minutes are not have not been prepared.

5:27

I know.

5:27

That's my my point.

5:29

Sure.

5:30

Thanks.

5:31

All right.

5:31

All those in favor of the motion?

5:35

So indicate by saying aye.

5:37

Aye.

5:38

I motion carries unanimously.

5:43

All right.

5:43

Next on the agenda is correspondence or study commission update.

5:48

Any reports from anyone on anything that's been going on for them.

5:55

Jad.

5:56

Becky, did you?

5:58

Did you have anything?

5:59

I don't think so.

6:00

Okay.

6:00

I'm thinking hard, but I don't think so.

6:02

I was just trying to model if we one by one.

6:06

Sorry, that's okay.

6:08

I just want to do a short outreach report on some of the areas Becky and I have been working on around communications and outreach.

6:17

That we had asked your permission last time to submit a proposal to the Pachaka Chaw program.

6:24

But as we discovered that the program, if we're proposal had been accepted in February, would have removed two of us to make the program for the Pachaka Chaos.

6:35

So Becky and I decided to move that proposal to either the next round in June or September of 2026.

6:43

So that's just an FYI.

6:51

Presentation to the League of Women Voters as requested on March 23rd at noon.

6:57

And that lastly, we're submitting a proposal to the business and professional women for either April or September, again, along the same lines as strategic outreach that I had proposed many times over and are now acting upon.

7:12

I think we should also consider continuing a few op-eds, particularly to launch this whole new stage two, if you will, of the study commission's work so that we reach some of the frankly the city influencers that read the op-ed and opinion page and happy to work with folks on that.

7:38

And last is just a really interesting program I saw this morning in at our university.

7:43

I'm going to pass this around, but I'll it's because I only made one copy, but you can take a photo if you're interested.

7:49

It's a four-part series by the University MSU, their College of Letters and Science called Public Things: Conditions for a Sustainable Democracy.

8:00

And they start out by looking at a city commission meeting in Boston that was filmed by the acclaimed documentarian Frederick Wiseman.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Charter Revision███████████████████████████████31%
Government Ethics██████████████████18%
Election Procedures█████████████13%
Public Engagement███████████11%
Board Operations███████████11%
Community Engagement████████8%
Procedural██████6%
Personnel Matters1%
Fiscal Sustainability1%
Summary of Proceedings

Bozeman Study Commission Meeting: Governance Structure & Survey Results - January 15, 2026

The Bozeman Study Commission met on January 15, 2026, from 4:00 PM to approximately 7:09 PM in the Commission Room at City Hall, 121 North Rouse. Chair Carson Taylor presided. The meeting included a learning session on governing body structure facilitated by Dan Clark, Executive Director of the Local Government Center at MSU Extension, and a presentation from Working Ventures on communication action plan survey results. Key decisions were made on drafting the final report and discussion of potential charter changes.

Consent Calendar

  • Claims Review and Approval (D.1): A motion to approve payment of claims (BCSC Invoice #4, December 2025) passed 5-0. (Motion by Becky Franks, seconded by Jan Strout.)

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Commission Deanna Campbell submitted a written statement for the record addressing uncertainties and ambiguities in the survey data, cautioning against acting prematurely.

Discussion Items

F.1 – Determine Who Will Draft the City Study Commission Report

  • The Commission discussed assigning two members to co-draft the initial report, due by May 18, 2026. Becky Franks and Barb Cestero volunteered, citing their writing experience with policy and bylaws. Deanna Campbell expressed willingness to contribute but noted the importance of balance in perspectives. A motion to assign Becky Franks and Barb Cestero as co-drafters carried 4-0 (with one abstention). (Motion by Jan Strout, seconded by Becky Franks.)

G.1 – Working Ventures: Communication Action Plan

  • Stan Odenthal of Working Ventures presented preliminary results from the city employee survey (174 responses, with 2 more added during the meeting, out of 524 total employees – 498 full-time, 26 part-time). Key findings include:
    • Employees showed strong support for the status quo: 72% favored the city manager retaining full executive authority (current form), compared to 18.9% for reduced powers and 5.5% for mayor as executive.
    • 72% of employees opposed electing additional officials (e.g., city clerk, treasurer, attorney), compared to a more even split in the community survey.
    • 53.4% of employees said the commission should not expand beyond five members (vs. 41.7% in the community survey).
    • Employees ranked accountability and efficient administration as top leadership qualities, while the community ranked accountable leadership first and democratic representation higher.
    • On geographic representation, employees were divided: 23 strongly disagreed, 20 disagreed, 45 neutral, 45 agreed, and 31 strongly agreed with prioritizing district-based representation.
  • The Commission reviewed draft surveys for current and past city commissioners (since 2015) and advisory board members (since 2021). Questions addressed hours per week, full-time status, stipend fairness, and role clarity. Commissioners suggested reducing “unsure” options and adding an “other volunteer service” choice for question 28. Surveys will be sent out for ~10-11 day windows.
  • Anna from Working Ventures outlined the Spring 2026 communication strategy (1/8-page ads in the Chronicle bi-weekly, social media campaigns, posters). Budget and saturation levels are pending approval.

G.2 – Learning Session on Governing Body: Size, Terms, Duties, Mayor System, and Other Elected Offices

  • Dan Clark facilitated a discussion using a comparison chart of 14 Montana municipalities. Key points include:
    • Commission size: Montana cities average 7.2 members (including mayor). Research suggests 5-7 is a “sweet spot,” but gains up to 12 are minimal. Bozeman has 5 commissioners plus a mayor—on the low end. Butte (12) is considering downsizing due to low engagement.
    • At-large vs. wards: Bozeman, Great Falls, and Helena are the only large cities with at-large elections. Most others use wards. Clark noted wards can lead to hyper-local focus and resource allocation conflicts. Historical note: Bozeman eliminated wards in 1929 after adopting the city manager form.
    • Mayor term and deputy mayor: Bozeman’s unique “2+2” deputy mayor system (first two years as deputy, last two as mayor) is widely criticized. Clark shared an anecdote that it was added as a political bargaining chip. Most cities have 4-year mayor terms. Clark advised that if changed, a transition plan is needed, and no elected official can lose office due to a charter change.
    • Duties of commissioners: Clark recommended keeping the charter broad (like a constitution) and letting policies define specifics. However, Commission members noted public dissatisfaction with lack of transparency and representation may warrant more specific charter language.
    • Full-time vs. part-time: Clark said Montana municipalities do not typically classify commissioners as full- or part-time. Stipends vary (Bozeman’s is the highest, ~$34-$40k/year). Clark noted that low pay can limit demographic diversity.
    • Vacancy: Most charters follow state law (30 days to appoint). Missoula mandates 120 days; Butte and Belgrade require 60 days. Appointed officials serve until the next election (max ~2 years). The cost of a special election is ~$105,000.
    • Term limits: Clark advised caution, as state law may prohibit them, and recommended legal counsel review.

Key Outcomes

  • Report drafting: Becky Franks and Barb Cestero appointed as co-drafters of the City Study Commission Report (motion carried 4-0).
  • Next Meeting (Jan 28, 2026): The Commission will discuss potential charter changes including: Deputy Mayor, number of commissioners, partisan/nonpartisan elections, other elected offices, vacancy timeline, and duties of commissioners. Commissioners agreed that wards/districts will be discussed later (Feb-March).
  • Requests for information:
    • Commissioner Jan Strout requested cost estimates for 5 full-time city commissioners.
    • Commissioner Strout requested average median income (AMI) for Gallatin County.
    • The Commission requested Dan Clark and Mike Maas investigate other commissions with full-time work and their job descriptions, as well as Gallatin County Commissioner salaries and job descriptions.
  • Future Meeting Date: The July 2 meeting may be moved to late June to avoid holiday conflicts; Mike Maas will check feasibility.
  • Legal Opinion: Dan Clark recommended the Commission seek a formal opinion from City Attorney Greg Sullivan on how many charter changes can be proposed on a single ballot (referencing MCA 7-3-150 and 7-3-151).

Meeting Transcript

One minute morning. Can I show that on your test? Are you there? Hey, Barbara. Just tested. I I can hear Mike, but everybody else is really far away. They haven't turned their microphone. That's because we have our microphones on. Okay. Do you microphones are absolutely critical when you're on Zoom? I now have understood. Yes. Yes. Do you have a camera? Because we can't see you if you think you can be seen. Oh, hi. Okay. Mike, are you ready? I'll call to order the study commission of Bozeman meeting of January fifteenth, twenty twenty six and ask all who were able to please stand for the pledge of allegiance and then a moment of silence. You can be seated for the moment of silence. Seeing none, is there any online? Public comment. Second. Any public comment? Since it's a consent agenda, we don't discuss it unless someone wants to pull something from that agenda. May I ask a question? Should we acknowledge the minutes or not a part of the record that normally goes into a consent agenda? The minutes are not have not been prepared. I know. That's my my point. Sure. Thanks. All right. All those in favor of the motion? So indicate by saying aye. Aye. I motion carries unanimously. All right. Next on the agenda is correspondence or study commission update. Any reports from anyone on anything that's been going on for them. Jad. Becky, did you? Did you have anything? I don't think so. Okay. I'm thinking hard, but I don't think so. I was just trying to model if we one by one. Sorry, that's okay. I just want to do a short outreach report on some of the areas Becky and I have been working on around communications and outreach. That we had asked your permission last time to submit a proposal to the Pachaka Chaw program.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com