OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Bozeman City Commission Meeting - May 12, 2026

City CommissionTuesday, May 12, 2026
BodyBozeman, Montana
SessionCity Commission
DateTuesday, May 12, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:05:31

Transcript — Verbatim
0:54

Good evening and welcome to the May twelfth twenty twenty six City of Bozeman City Commission meeting.

1:00

We're glad you're here with us this evening.

1:02

A few notes on how to participate as we're going about our business this evening.

1:07

Those of us that are in the room, of course, you're you're here, you're present, you're in the room.

1:12

Anyone streaming online, you have upline, you'll have op mine, you'll have op mine, you'll have op line, you'll have outline.

1:49

Okay, so we're we're taking a delayed start.

1:51

Is that what I'm hearing?

1:53

Great.

1:55

So sit tight, everyone.

4:45

Enter your participant ID followed by pound.

4:48

Otherwise, just press pound to continue.

4:58

You have entered the meeting as a panelist.

5:01

Attendees can now hear you speak.

5:20

Try it again.

5:27

Okay, we're gonna give it another try.

5:30

Welcome everyone to the May 12th, 2026 City of Bozeman City Commission meeting.

5:36

We'll get things started a second time, hopefully, no more infinite loops of my voice.

5:44

A few notes on how to participate with us this evening.

5:47

Those in the room, you'll have your opportunity to give public comment on each of our associate action items.

5:52

For those streaming online from our video conferencing page, you'll be able to as well using the raise your hand feature.

6:00

And of course, more passive ways to follow along is either dialing in on the phone number that is on any of our posted city city commission agendas or on cable TV channel one ninety.

6:14

As we're going through our items today, there will be several opportunities to provide public comment, each of our action items as well as our consent agenda, as well as on non-agenda items when we call for those.

6:36

Those comments were distributed to myself and the rest of the city commission and the associated staff.

6:42

And so that is more or less how our run of show is going to run this evening.

6:51

Um when we will have public comment as an opportunity so folks don't feel uh that they're gonna miss their chance.

6:57

Um so without further ado, we will kick off our meeting the way we always do with a with the pledge of allegiance and a moment of silence.

7:38

Thank you.

7:48

Okay, moving on to changes to the agenda.

7:51

City manager, do you have any changes this evening?

7:54

Yes, we do, Mayor.

7:55

There are two changes.

7:56

Uh we'd like to add a mail or proclamation right after public comment after G between G and H.

8:03

And then I would like to move uh item H7, which is the Midtown Urban Renewal District Financial Year 2026 annual report to item H3.

8:15

So that will be the first uh plan and budget after the downtown, the two downtown items.

8:23

Okay.

8:23

Thank you, Mayor.

8:24

Thank you, City Manager.

8:26

Um, moving on to FYI.

8:28

Is there any FYI from the commission this evening?

8:32

I would like to Commissioner Sweet.

8:36

Thank you.

8:37

So today, uh, members of the Historic Preservation Advisory Board did submit their letter of recommendation to this body to consider an interim zoning ordinance.

8:53

And I just wanted to read a few excerpts of that.

8:57

Um, and remind everyone that this board, the historic preservation advisory board, is made up to include architects, design professionals, and certified planners.

9:17

Part of their letter states, currently, there is a stated scope and schedule to the NCOD rewrite process that should fit within the one-year time frame of an interim zoning ordinance.

9:31

It is not undefined or arbitrary.

9:35

An interim zoning ordinance seeks to regulate or prohibit, meaning there is room to define how it gets implemented and what the parameters of its influence are.

9:48

It's not an all or nothing approach, but can be defined, it can be fine-tuned for specific scenarios.

9:56

Implementing an interim zoning ordinance in this instance aligns with the city's stated priority of historic preservation, as there is currently a potential threat to public welfare in the rush of projects being submitted prior to the implementation of any changes to the NCOD design guidelines.

10:20

It is urgent that these concerns are addressed before we have an actual emergency.

10:36

While the UDC rewrite addressed the creation of Bozeman's future, the NCOD design guideline rewrite addresses the stewardship of Bozeman's past, a finite and threatened commodity.

10:51

While the loss of its historic preservation with the loss of its historic preservation officer, Bozeman currently lacks credentialed staff member to preside over the COA process, potentially weakening the evaluation of appropriateness for projects within the NCOD.

11:13

Other staff members have limited resources for filling that gap in a meaningful and enforceable way, and IZO would relieve staff of having to make potentially charged decisions during this transition period.

11:30

While form use and regulation have all been debated and canonized into the city's unified development code, the pending changes to the NCOD design guidelines and certificate of appropriateness have not.

11:48

From the perspective of historic preservation, one year is negligible compared to the city's 162 years of history and its next 100 years in the future.

12:05

Saying that, you know, addressing this during FYI feels inappropriate.

12:14

It is not a conversation.

12:16

We are not allowed to respond to each other, and we don't involve the public.

12:24

I can understand how there's a feeling of predictability because the zoning matches our neighborhoods.

12:32

The most change we are likely to see is an ADU on the block somewhere.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Economic Development█████████████████████████████████████████████47%
Miscellaneous█████████████████████████26%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████8%
Community Engagement█████5%
Transportation Safety████4%
Technology and Innovation████4%
Affordable Housing███3%
Procedural██2%
Historic Preservation1%
Summary of Proceedings

Bozeman City Commission Meeting - May 12, 2026

The Bozeman City Commission held a regular meeting on May 12, 2026, starting at approximately 12:45 PM. The meeting covered a mayoral proclamation, multiple urban renewal district annual reports and work plans for fiscal years 2027 and 2028, public comments on various topics, and consent agenda items. Key discussions included support for the Equal Rights Amendment, urban renewal district budgets, an action plan for Midtown, and concerns about tenants at the MSU Innovation Campus.

Consent Calendar

  • The commission approved consent items F1 through F13 in a 5-0 vote. Items included a grant for a fully electric bucket truck and a fully voltaic system at the library, as highlighted by Commissioner Bodie, and a contract extension for a third traffic circle on West Olive and South Sixth Street, noted by the city manager.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Courtney Johnson, a former city planner, homeowner, and business owner, requested that the commission direct staff to place the Gallatin High Residential Parking District request on a commission agenda. She stated the process has stalled for nearly two years without formal response. The city manager committed to investigating and providing an answer.
  • Dan Cardi, a Bozeman resident, urged the commission to immediately adopt an interim zoning ordinance (IZO) for the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCOD) to pause major exterior construction and demolition until the NCOD update is complete.
  • Nathan Stein, Executive Director of Headwaters Community Housing Trust, expressed strong support for the Midtown URD budget and the proposed $2.5 million land acquisition loan fund for affordable housing.
  • Emily Talego, a Bozeman resident, advocated for a North Seventh traffic modality summit, a business improvement district for Midtown, and renewed focus on multimodal infrastructure. She also commented on the Pole Yard quiet zone, warning of long-term liability for the city.
  • Julian Staggs, an MSU student and member of Students Against Genocide, opposed funding for the MSU Innovation Campus, citing tenants Reveal Technology and others that sell AI-powered military tech to the Israeli military. He asked the commission to withhold funding until a strong ethics policy is developed.
  • Taylor Pynan, an MSU student and Bozeman resident, echoed these concerns, urging the commission to break or renegotiate the contract with the Innovation Campus.
  • Skylar (MSU alum), Alana Selinger, Jackson Staggs, and William McLean also spoke against the Innovation Campus funding, describing the tenants' ties to genocide and urging the commission to vote no.
  • Emily Talego also commented on the Pole Yard quiet zone, noting that railroads oppose quiet zones and that liability shifts to the city once compliant, and suggested the increment could be placed in the general fund.

Discussion Items

  • Mayoral Proclamation: Mayor Morrison proclaimed support for the Equal Rights Amendment, citing ratification by 37 states and urging Congress to modify the deadline. The proclamation was shared with the community.
  • Downtown Business Improvement District (BID): Emily Cope presented the FY27 work plan and budget ($295,000 assessment). The BID board unanimously approved. Commissioners praised the program for flowers, holiday spiders, and graffiti removal. Approved 5-0.
  • Downtown Urban Renewal District (URD): Ellie Staley presented the FY27 and FY28 work plan and budget. Key projects include improvements to Seroptimus Park (including lead paint mural), parking garage maintenance, and preparation for the 2032 sunset. Commissioner Sweeney asked about police presence funding; Staley noted it may not be an allowable URD expense. Approved 5-0.
  • Midtown Urban Renewal District: David Fine presented the FY27 and FY28 work plan and budget. The TIFF advisory board voted 6-0 to recommend, with an amendment to keep the "other" line item flexible. Discussion centered on a proposed $2.5 million loan fund for nonprofit housing land acquisition, an action plan update, and public comments calling for a new action plan. Commissioner Magic moved to approve with two amendments: (1) reduce parking garage design funding by $100,000 to fund an action plan ($50,000-$100,000 goal), and (2) adopt clarifying language for the "other" bucket prioritizing infrastructure, neighborhood planning, and a pilot loan program for affordable housing. Both amendments passed 5-0. The main motion passed 5-0.
  • South Bozeman Technology District: David Fine presented the budget, which includes up to $3.6 million in bond reimbursement for the MSU Innovation Campus infrastructure. Public comment focused on tenants with ties to the Israeli military. Commissioners expressed sympathy but noted the city is contractually obligated to reimburse. They committed to exploring ethics policies and further meetings with students. Approved 5-0.
  • North Park Urban Renewal District: David Fine described the district as a placeholder for future industrial development; no active projects. Approved 5-0.
  • Pole Yard Urban Renewal District: David Fine presented the budget, primarily for a quiet zone project at Rouse Avenue crossing to allow trains to refrain from sounding horns. Commissioner Sweeney raised liability concerns and questioned whether the increment should go to the general fund. The public comment warned of long-term liability and insurance rate increases if compliance requirements change. Approved 5-0.
  • Northeast Urban Renewal District: David Fine presented the budget, which includes Wallace crossing quiet zone improvements, a tree planting program, and Church Street right-of-way improvements for Bozeman Creek access. The Northeast Neighborhood Association was engaged. Commissioners noted the neighborhood's fingerprints on the plan. Approved 5-0.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved consent agenda (F1-F13) 5-0.
  • Approved Downtown BID FY27 work plan and budget 5-0.
  • Approved Downtown URD FY27 and FY28 work plan and budget 5-0.
  • Approved Midtown URD FY27 and FY28 work plan and budget with two amendments (action plan funding and language clarification) 5-0.
  • Approved South Bozeman Technology District FY27 and FY28 work plan and budget 5-0.
  • Approved North Park URD FY27 and FY28 work plan and budget 5-0.
  • Approved Pole Yard URD FY27 and FY28 work plan and budget 5-0.
  • Approved Northeast URD FY27 and FY28 work plan and budget 5-0.
  • The city manager agreed to investigate the status of the Gallatin High Residential Parking District request.
  • The commission committed to further discussions with students and the community regarding an ethics policy for the MSU Innovation Campus.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening and welcome to the May twelfth twenty twenty six City of Bozeman City Commission meeting. We're glad you're here with us this evening. A few notes on how to participate as we're going about our business this evening. Those of us that are in the room, of course, you're you're here, you're present, you're in the room. Anyone streaming online, you have upline, you'll have op mine, you'll have op mine, you'll have op line, you'll have outline. Okay, so we're we're taking a delayed start. Is that what I'm hearing? Great. So sit tight, everyone. Enter your participant ID followed by pound. Otherwise, just press pound to continue. You have entered the meeting as a panelist. Attendees can now hear you speak. Try it again. Okay, we're gonna give it another try. Welcome everyone to the May 12th, 2026 City of Bozeman City Commission meeting. We'll get things started a second time, hopefully, no more infinite loops of my voice. A few notes on how to participate with us this evening. Those in the room, you'll have your opportunity to give public comment on each of our associate action items. For those streaming online from our video conferencing page, you'll be able to as well using the raise your hand feature. And of course, more passive ways to follow along is either dialing in on the phone number that is on any of our posted city city commission agendas or on cable TV channel one ninety. As we're going through our items today, there will be several opportunities to provide public comment, each of our action items as well as our consent agenda, as well as on non-agenda items when we call for those. Those comments were distributed to myself and the rest of the city commission and the associated staff. And so that is more or less how our run of show is going to run this evening. Um when we will have public comment as an opportunity so folks don't feel uh that they're gonna miss their chance. Um so without further ado, we will kick off our meeting the way we always do with a with the pledge of allegiance and a moment of silence. Thank you. Okay, moving on to changes to the agenda. City manager, do you have any changes this evening? Yes, we do, Mayor. There are two changes. Uh we'd like to add a mail or proclamation right after public comment after G between G and H. And then I would like to move uh item H7, which is the Midtown Urban Renewal District Financial Year 2026 annual report to item H3. So that will be the first uh plan and budget after the downtown, the two downtown items. Okay. Thank you, Mayor. Thank you, City Manager. Um, moving on to FYI. Is there any FYI from the commission this evening? I would like to Commissioner Sweet. Thank you. So today, uh, members of the Historic Preservation Advisory Board did submit their letter of recommendation to this body to consider an interim zoning ordinance. And I just wanted to read a few excerpts of that. Um, and remind everyone that this board, the historic preservation advisory board, is made up to include architects, design professionals, and certified planners. Part of their letter states, currently, there is a stated scope and schedule to the NCOD rewrite process that should fit within the one-year time frame of an interim zoning ordinance. It is not undefined or arbitrary. An interim zoning ordinance seeks to regulate or prohibit, meaning there is room to define how it gets implemented and what the parameters of its influence are. It's not an all or nothing approach, but can be defined, it can be fine-tuned for specific scenarios. Implementing an interim zoning ordinance in this instance aligns with the city's stated priority of historic preservation, as there is currently a potential threat to public welfare in the rush of projects being submitted prior to the implementation of any changes to the NCOD design guidelines. It is urgent that these concerns are addressed before we have an actual emergency.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com