The Bozeman City Commission held a regular meeting on May 12, 2026, starting at approximately 12:45 PM. The meeting covered a mayoral proclamation, multiple urban renewal district annual reports and work plans for fiscal years 2027 and 2028, public comments on various topics, and consent agenda items. Key discussions included support for the Equal Rights Amendment, urban renewal district budgets, an action plan for Midtown, and concerns about tenants at the MSU Innovation Campus.
Good evening and welcome to the May twelfth twenty twenty six City of Bozeman City Commission meeting. We're glad you're here with us this evening. A few notes on how to participate as we're going about our business this evening. Those of us that are in the room, of course, you're you're here, you're present, you're in the room. Anyone streaming online, you have upline, you'll have op mine, you'll have op mine, you'll have op line, you'll have outline. Okay, so we're we're taking a delayed start. Is that what I'm hearing? Great. So sit tight, everyone. Enter your participant ID followed by pound. Otherwise, just press pound to continue. You have entered the meeting as a panelist. Attendees can now hear you speak. Try it again. Okay, we're gonna give it another try. Welcome everyone to the May 12th, 2026 City of Bozeman City Commission meeting. We'll get things started a second time, hopefully, no more infinite loops of my voice. A few notes on how to participate with us this evening. Those in the room, you'll have your opportunity to give public comment on each of our associate action items. For those streaming online from our video conferencing page, you'll be able to as well using the raise your hand feature. And of course, more passive ways to follow along is either dialing in on the phone number that is on any of our posted city city commission agendas or on cable TV channel one ninety. As we're going through our items today, there will be several opportunities to provide public comment, each of our action items as well as our consent agenda, as well as on non-agenda items when we call for those. Those comments were distributed to myself and the rest of the city commission and the associated staff. And so that is more or less how our run of show is going to run this evening. Um when we will have public comment as an opportunity so folks don't feel uh that they're gonna miss their chance. Um so without further ado, we will kick off our meeting the way we always do with a with the pledge of allegiance and a moment of silence. Thank you. Okay, moving on to changes to the agenda. City manager, do you have any changes this evening? Yes, we do, Mayor. There are two changes. Uh we'd like to add a mail or proclamation right after public comment after G between G and H. And then I would like to move uh item H7, which is the Midtown Urban Renewal District Financial Year 2026 annual report to item H3. So that will be the first uh plan and budget after the downtown, the two downtown items. Okay. Thank you, Mayor. Thank you, City Manager. Um, moving on to FYI. Is there any FYI from the commission this evening? I would like to Commissioner Sweet. Thank you. So today, uh, members of the Historic Preservation Advisory Board did submit their letter of recommendation to this body to consider an interim zoning ordinance. And I just wanted to read a few excerpts of that. Um, and remind everyone that this board, the historic preservation advisory board, is made up to include architects, design professionals, and certified planners. Part of their letter states, currently, there is a stated scope and schedule to the NCOD rewrite process that should fit within the one-year time frame of an interim zoning ordinance. It is not undefined or arbitrary. An interim zoning ordinance seeks to regulate or prohibit, meaning there is room to define how it gets implemented and what the parameters of its influence are. It's not an all or nothing approach, but can be defined, it can be fine-tuned for specific scenarios. Implementing an interim zoning ordinance in this instance aligns with the city's stated priority of historic preservation, as there is currently a potential threat to public welfare in the rush of projects being submitted prior to the implementation of any changes to the NCOD design guidelines. It is urgent that these concerns are addressed before we have an actual emergency.