Bozeman City Study Commission Meeting - May 20, 2026
Bozeman City Study Commission Meeting Summary - May 20, 2026
The Bozeman City Study Commission met on May 20, 2026, at 10:00 AM with a hard stop at 6:00 PM. The meeting focused on ballot language for a ward system, commissioner compensation, the number of commissioners, and review of the draft charter. The commission took several votes and continued the meeting to May 27, 2026.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Brian Close (former study commissioner, 1140 Cherry Drive) urged reinstating the phrase "principal residence" in the elector definition (Section 2.02) to prevent landlords voting from rental addresses, and supported expanding the city commission from five to seven members.
- Mark Camp (Bogert Park Neighborhood Association president, speaking for himself) opposed striking neighborhood associations and the Inter-Neighborhood Council from the charter, and suggested Section 8.02 was superfluous.
- Billy Warford (online comment) opposed the ward system, stating it would increase division.
- Beth Boyson (1140 Cherry Drive) urged the commission to pick one ballot option before taking public comment.
- Natsuki Nakamura (Bozeman resident, not representing the Economic Vitality Board or Better Bozeman Coalition) preferred a single clear ballot question (alternative two) and supported district-only voting if wards are adopted.
- Tim Marsenko (1216 South Third Avenue) asked about the number of wards (equal to non-mayoral commissioners) and later urged keeping four commissioners if wards are adopted.
- Mary Bateson (Bozeman resident) favored no change in commissioner number but supported a ballot question; cautioned that more commissioners does not reduce workload.
- Jane Jelinski (North Tracy) emphasized adequate commissioner compensation and warned that increasing to six commissioners would be expensive and likely voted down.
- Ann Vince-Aguera (Valley West/Lakes Neighborhood Association) supported strong language for neighborhood associations and the Inter-Neighborhood Council.
- Dan Cardi (Bozeman resident) thanked the commission for keeping public engagement in the draft charter and criticized the deputy mayor’s request to strike it.
- Angie Katoak (620 North Tracy Avenue, INC rep for Northeast Neighborhood Association, speaking for herself) noted many written public comments opposing the removal of neighborhood association language.
Discussion Items
- Ward Ballot Language: The commission debated multiple options for ballot sub-options regarding a ward system.
- First Motion (Deanna): Option A – at-large system; Option B – ward system with commissioners living in a ward and elected only by voters in that ward. Failed (1-4 vote).
- Second Motion (Barb): Alternative three – Option A at-large; Option B wards with commissioners elected at-large. Failed (1-4 vote).
- Third Motion (unmoved? Actually motion by Deanna? The final motion was for alternative one, moved and seconded): Two sub-options: Sub-option 1 – choose at-large or ward system; Sub-option 2 – if ward system approved, choose election by ward voters only or at-large. Passed (5-0).
- Commissioner Pay and Number of Commissioners:
- Motion (Jan and Carson): Establish a Compensation Board (two commissioners, city CFO, four residents) to set salaries for mayor and commissioners based on a percentage of Gallatin County area median income (AMI) and expected hours. Passed (4 yes, 1 abstention – Deanna). The motion was amended to allow word-smithing.
- Motion (unmoved?): Add a third sub-option for voters to choose between 4 or 6 commissioners (not including the mayor). Passed (voice vote, no opposition noted).
- Draft Charter Review: Began review of the draft charter. A motion to amend the preamble to add "human rights" after "democratic representation" was moved and seconded but not voted on due to time constraints.
- Mayor Election: Discussion confirmed the mayor will remain elected at-large regardless of commissioner numbers.
Key Outcomes
- Adopted ballot language for two sub-options on wards (as described above).
- Adopted a third sub-option for voters to choose between 4 or 6 commissioners.
- Approved a Compensation Board model for commissioner and mayor salaries, pending final language.
- The meeting was continued to Wednesday, May 27, 2026, at 4:00 PM to complete the draft charter review and address remaining motions (including the preamble amendment and other proposed changes).
- The motion to continue passed 4-0.
Meeting Transcript
I'll call to order the Bozeman City Study Commission meeting of May 20th, 2026, and ask all who are capable to please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. It will be followed by a moment of silence, for which you may be seated if you would like. Pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. To the public for which it stands, one nation. Indivisible. Liberty and justice for all. Thank you. Next item on the agenda is changes to the agenda. Are there any changes? I didn't think any. Next item is public comment on anything within the jurisdiction of the study commission. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less. Please state your name and address at the beginning of your comments. There will be time before each item on unfinished business and new business. If you want to save your comments to make them more close in time to when we might be discussing them, but if you want to make comments now, you can do it. You just can't have two bites of the apple. Okay. I see someone is ready to give public comment. The floor is yours, sir. Yes, hi. Um my name is Brian Close. I'm a former study commissioner and my principal residence, and this is what this is about. My principal residence is at 1140 Cherry Drive. Um back when we drafted this charter, there was a problem with landlords voting from their rental addresses, even though they did not live in town. And um it was uh getting to be a problem. So when we were looking at the word for defining an elector under section 2.02 for who's an elector for voting for the city commission, we put in the phrase principal residence, which is more exclusive exclusive than the constitutional definition that has currently been substituted for that. I've litigated this issue in the sense I had a I had a couple cases before the commissioner of political practices, and the problem with Montana law, and this included a case that wasn't mine from people who are voting both in Wyoming and Park County. Um Park County, Montana, is that there really isn't a good definition of residency. So I would encourage you to go back to the original charter language of principal residents. If it's unconstitutional, we still have the constitution to fall back on, and it may discourage some fairly bad conduct. Uh finally, just want to mention as a citizen and as a as a study commissioner, I supported seven study commissioners back in 2006. That's why you have that hokey vote language that you were deleting from the charter to increase the commission. I encourage you to increase the commission. There's just too much discount's too big for five people to represent it. Uh to increase the commission to seven. Uh and I can stay a little bit if you have questions, but I do have uh other duties. Um so those are those are my concerns and recommendations. Thank you. Thank you, Brian. Are there any questions of Brian in case? Okay. Fair enough. Is there any other public comment at this time? I saw three people wave, but I assume they didn't want to give public comment. They were waving goodbye to Brian. Is there any other public comment at this time? Thank you. Hi there, uh Mark Camp and I am a Bogar Park uh resident. I'm also the president in grep for Bogert Park Neighborhood Association. I speak for myself though.
openpublica.com