The City of Brookings held a regular meeting on November 18, 2025, to address agenda items including routine approvals, ongoing community projects, a new police facility site search, budget adoption, and public hearings on licenses and zoning. Mayor Nemeyer was absent for the evening. The council approved the consent agenda, adopted the 2026 appropriation ordinance, and entered an executive session for vulnerability assessments without taking action.
I call this meeting to order. Please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. Will the city clerk please take attendance? Mayor Nemeyer is absent this evening. All other council members are present, Deputy Mayor. Thank you. Item number three is the approval of the agenda. I'd like to entertain a motion to approve the agenda. So move. Second. Okay, we have a motion and a second. Are there any comments on the agenda from the public? Any comments on the agenda from a member of the council? All right, hearing none, will the city clerk please call the roll? Hager. Aye. Specker? Aye. Tilton Burden. Aye. Wendell? Aye. Avery? Doran. Aye. Motion passes. Okay, item number four is an open forum, which is an opportunity for a member of the public to address the council on an item that is not otherwise listed on our agenda. Would any member of the public like to come forward and speak in the open forum? Okay. Two Mondays ago, we had an opportunity to host uh a couple of open houses about a potential uh building project. Uh as many folks in the community know, we are considering whether or not to build a new police department facility and where we should build such a facility. During the open house, we had an opportunity to discuss a piece of land that is on the corner of Fifth and Medairy, adjacent to our high school in Maderi Elementary, and have good public comment around the use of that particular piece of land. Uh city staff had worked with the council to identify more than 20 potential properties throughout the community that might be appropriate settings for a new police department facility. That one sort of bubbled to the top for a variety of reasons, but we knew that there were a number of stakeholders that would have interest in that particular property. And so before we invested a lot more time and resources and planning around that property, we thought it would be valuable to host some open forums so members of the public and stakeholders, folks from the neighborhood, uh folks from the school board and the school district could be a part of a community conversation related to the pros and cons of that particular property. And so we got a lot of great feedback and that elicited lots of feedback online, and I know as counselors we've heard from lots of members of the public about that particular property and its suitability for a future home for the Brookings Police Department. After we received that feedback and had that conversation, we turned back to staff and have asked them to continue considering properties throughout the community that could be suitable locations for a police department facility in the future. And so that property is not entirely off the table, but it's now part of a continuing conversation about potential locations. And I think by mid-January, staff will come back to us with a list of potential property in the community that could be home to a future police department. And we'll have lots of considerations that will be part of what would be the best place for that uh future facility. Uh obviously, cost as a driver, if it's connected to a main artery or thoroughfare in the community. Uh is it connected to other risk factors and other areas in the community? There's lots of criteria that we would use to determine the most suitable future location for the Brookings Police Department. But that really kicked off an initial phase of the community conversation, and we wanted to circle back with you all to let you know that the conversation is ongoing, and by mid-January, we'll get a full report from staff uh around other potential locations for a future police department facility. Okay, I think that closes item number four. Item number five is the consent agenda. Are there any items to be removed from the consent agenda? Or any questions related to items on the consent agenda? Councilmember Specker? Yeah, and I think this uh question is for Bonnie.