OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Butte Silver Bow, Montana/Council of Commissioners & Committees
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Butte Public Works Committee Meeting – October 29, 2026: Stormwater Project & Intersection Safety

Council of Commissioners & Committees — Thursday, October 29, 2026
BodyButte Silver Bow, Montana
SessionCouncil of Commissioners & Committees
DateThursday, October 29, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
Meeting Thumbnail
⇩ GET FROM SOURCE

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Original source
Transcript — Verbatim

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

2:46

I will call the public works committee meeting October twenty eighth, twenty twenty-six, six thirty PM courthouse council chambers.

2:53

In attendance today is Josh O'Neill, Dan Callahan, Russell Larry, Trudy Healy, Commissioner Boyle is absent and excused, and myself, Eric Mankins is the chair.

3:16

So there's two on it.

3:17

So first up is communication number twenty twenty-six-five one zero.

3:22

Mark Phillips But Montana requests Council of Commissioners to present information on a failed stormwater project in his neighborhood located at the corner of a Western and Bretana to the public works committee.

3:34

In presence tonight, we do have Mark Phillips and we do have a presentations of about twenty nine slides.

Speaker 2

4:30

Respect and appreciation for the public works counties for all county employees.

4:36

I'm only here because this is such a standout egregious construction project that I feel has clearly failed, and lessons need to be learned from

Unassigned speaker

4:48

it.

Speaker 2

4:48

I'm going to skip ahead to slide 15 to start.

4:55

And in slide 15, we're going to see two different flow paths.

5:01

Oops.

5:03

Here's slide 15.

5:05

The blue line is what I believe is an adequate representation of the likely path of flow of uncontrolled stormwater prior to 2026, as it flowed from the corner down to the south, where there is a stormwater collection ditch at the bottom there.

5:26

The county in 2026 constructed a stormwater channel, which is shown by the solid red line.

5:35

What I want to point out here is that water is preferring to flow more to the south, where the channel constructed by the county is flowing more to the east.

5:45

That means that that channel is working against the direction that water is going to prefer to flow, and as we see as the direction that it will flow.

5:57

What originally caught my eye was walking through the neighborhood.

6:01

This was the completed project.

6:03

There's a drain, but there's no curb.

6:13

So when a storm event happens, the water is able to flow past the drain

Unassigned speaker

6:19

if

Speaker 2

6:19

it's a strong enough storm event, and right beyond the top of the stormwater channel.

6:25

Here's a cross section of what the construction looks like.

6:28

There's the drain entrance at the street corner.

6:31

There's a drain pipe that delivers water to approximately the middle of the armored channel.

6:39

I was present during a rain event on July 30th.

6:44

I filmed this rain event.

6:45

You're going to see screenshots from this event.

6:48

But there were two noticeable failure points evident in that I saw.

6:54

This is failure point number one, as expected at the top.

6:58

Water is flowing, it's overwhelming the drain.

7:02

It's moving beyond the drain and right past the top of the channel.

7:07

It's flowing then out more towards the south where we knew it wanted to flow before.

7:14

Further down, about halfway down, we have kind of outlined there in red the end of the drain pipe.

7:20

The water that did enter the drain is now being discharged into the channel.

7:25

It overwhelmed the channel, and it again broke out here at failure point number two, where it broke out and moved to the south.

7:36

At the same time, I'm looking here up the channel.

7:40

That entire upper portion of the channel does not seem to serve any purpose.

7:45

All that rock is wasted.

7:47

There's no stormwater coming down through

Unassigned speaker

7:50

that.

Speaker 2

7:51

So some of my comments have been addressed.

7:56

This is a photo from Friday when we had that lovely rain.

8:00

You can see that the county has now added the curb wall there along to direct water into the drain.

8:09

In a letter provided by Director Neary, he stated that the curb wall uh forces the water on its quote intended path.

8:20

If the drain is the intended path, why was the upper half of that rock-armored channel even created?

8:28

Rock has now been extended behind the wall, but I seriously doubt that that will ever catch stormwater, that it will ever direct stormwater down through the upper

Speaker 3

8:38

channel.

8:40

This

Speaker 2

8:40

is on the same day.

8:41

This is the water that's coming out of the drain during that rainfall event.

8:46

You can see where it has it has wet up the southern side wall of the channel, and you can see the ponding.

8:54

The water is seeping through that sidewall, similar to what it did before.

8:59

Failure point number two has not been addressed by maintenance.

9:04

I'm now going to show you two photos to show a comparison of what the maintenance has done.

9:10

This is from July.

9:12

I'm looking down the channel to the east.

9:16

The red arrows highlight points of reference in both photos.

9:20

On the left is a rock that has like a little gash in it, and then further down are survey flags.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████████████████████52%
Public Engagement█████████████████20%
Transportation Safety█████████████████20%
Procedural███████8%
Summary of Proceedings

Butte Public Works Committee Meeting – October 29, 2026

The Public Works Committee of Butte-Silver Bow met on October 29, 2026, to consider two communications: a presentation by Mark Phillips regarding a failed stormwater project on Western and Bretana, and a request from Susan Schultz for traffic safety measures at the intersection of Amherst and Sheridan. The committee held both items for further review and action.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Mark Phillips – Presented a detailed slideshow alleging that a stormwater channel constructed by the county in 2026 at the corner of Western and Bretana failed during rain events. He identified two failure points: water overwhelming the drain and bypassing the channel, and water exiting the drain pipe and seeping through the channel sidewall. He argued the channel’s path did not align with natural water flow and that subsequent maintenance had removed ground along the south side, creating a new failure risk. He requested the committee investigate the project’s design and construction to prevent future failures.
  • Susan Schultz – Asked the committee to approve installation of a traffic light or other awareness measures at the intersection of Amherst and Sheridan due to frequent accidents. She described a recent crash where a 15-year-old unlicensed driver pulled out of Sheridan into oncoming traffic, sending four people to the hospital. She noted that had been the fifth accident at that intersection in five years and that her steel fence saved her house from being hit. She expressed openness to speed bumps or rumble strips as alternatives.

Discussion Items

  • Communication 2026-510 – Stormwater Project at Western and Bretana
    • Public Works Director Mark Neary responded that the channel predated county involvement (installed by the subdivision) and that the county had upgraded the catch basin, added a curb to direct water, and lowered the rock channel. He stated the upper channel was intended for overflow during large storms.
    • Neary disputed that county maintenance crews had excavated alongside the channel; he said a homeowner to the west had done that work.
    • Phillips countered with cadastral maps suggesting the land was school district property, not the homeowner’s.
    • Committee members questioned whether engineers should be hired and discussed liability. Commissioner Callahan noted the design appeared flawed from the start.
    • The committee decided to hold the item for two weeks to allow members to inspect the site and for staff to address remaining issues.
  • Communication 2026-513 – Intersection Safety at Amherst and Sheridan
    • Neary reported that road superintendent planned to deploy temporary speed signs on Amherst, though he acknowledged their limited effectiveness.
    • Discussion included possible four-way stop, flashing stop signs, rumble strips, and increased sheriff patrols. Neary noted a traffic study would be required for a traffic light and that monthly meetings with Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) could be used to request a study.
    • Commissioner O’Leary suggested a four-way stop as a simpler alternative. Commissioner Healy asked about flashing stop signs, but Neary mentioned noise complaints from nearby residents.
    • The committee moved to hold the communication to consult with MDT and explore options.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion to hold Communication 2026-510 – Passed without objection. The item will be revisited in two weeks after committee members view the site and staff possibly implement further mitigation.
  • Motion to hold Communication 2026-513 – Passed without objection. The committee will consult with MDT and consider additional safety measures, including a four-way stop or patrols, before the next meeting.

Meeting Transcript

I will call the public works committee meeting October twenty eighth, twenty twenty-six, six thirty PM courthouse council chambers. In attendance today is Josh O'Neill, Dan Callahan, Russell Larry, Trudy Healy, Commissioner Boyle is absent and excused, and myself, Eric Mankins is the chair. So there's two on it. So first up is communication number twenty twenty-six-five one zero. Mark Phillips But Montana requests Council of Commissioners to present information on a failed stormwater project in his neighborhood located at the corner of a Western and Bretana to the public works committee. In presence tonight, we do have Mark Phillips and we do have a presentations of about twenty nine slides. Respect and appreciation for the public works counties for all county employees. I'm only here because this is such a standout egregious construction project that I feel has clearly failed, and lessons need to be learned from it. I'm going to skip ahead to slide 15 to start. And in slide 15, we're going to see two different flow paths. Oops. Here's slide 15. The blue line is what I believe is an adequate representation of the likely path of flow of uncontrolled stormwater prior to 2026, as it flowed from the corner down to the south, where there is a stormwater collection ditch at the bottom there. The county in 2026 constructed a stormwater channel, which is shown by the solid red line. What I want to point out here is that water is preferring to flow more to the south, where the channel constructed by the county is flowing more to the east. That means that that channel is working against the direction that water is going to prefer to flow, and as we see as the direction that it will flow. What originally caught my eye was walking through the neighborhood. This was the completed project. There's a drain, but there's no curb. So when a storm event happens, the water is able to flow past the drain if it's a strong enough storm event, and right beyond the top of the stormwater channel. Here's a cross section of what the construction looks like. There's the drain entrance at the street corner. There's a drain pipe that delivers water to approximately the middle of the armored channel. I was present during a rain event on July 30th. I filmed this rain event. You're going to see screenshots from this event. But there were two noticeable failure points evident in that I saw. This is failure point number one, as expected at the top. Water is flowing, it's overwhelming the drain. It's moving beyond the drain and right past the top of the channel. It's flowing then out more towards the south where we knew it wanted to flow before. Further down, about halfway down, we have kind of outlined there in red the end of the drain pipe. The water that did enter the drain is now being discharged into the channel. It overwhelmed the channel, and it again broke out here at failure point number two, where it broke out and moved to the south. At the same time, I'm looking here up the channel. That entire upper portion of the channel does not seem to serve any purpose. All that rock is wasted. There's no stormwater coming down through that. So some of my comments have been addressed. This is a photo from Friday when we had that lovely rain. You can see that the county has now added the curb wall there along to direct water into the drain. In a letter provided by Director Neary, he stated that the curb wall uh forces the water on its quote intended path. If the drain is the intended path, why was the upper half of that rock-armored channel even created? Rock has now been extended behind the wall, but I seriously doubt that that will ever catch stormwater, that it will ever direct stormwater down through the upper channel. This

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com