Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The Carrollton City Council convened for a Worksession at 5:45 PM and a Regular Meeting at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, September 24, 2024, at City Hall. The agenda included presentations on Information Technology projects (including a new mobile app, chatbot, and voicebot demonstrations), a discussion on the Community Funding Policy, a proclamation recognizing Live United Month, approval of a substantial Consent Agenda, public hearings on a short-term rental and an amusement arcade, and a Public Forum. The meeting recessed into Executive Session for legal and personnel matters.
Items 9 through 25 were approved unanimously as a block with two stipulations. Key items included:
Stipulations:
Okay. Council, we are the time. It is five forty-six. We will begin our meeting. Um, as we always do, we'll start with our consent agenda items. So the minutes on item number nine for the September tenth meetings. Any comments on our minutes? Uh we had one edit on finance. Um other than that. It was consistent with our meeting though. So any other comments? Seeing none, we'll move on to uh number ten. Consider approval of bid number two four zero six three for water meters from Zen R USA and Neptune Technology Group and amount not to exceed a hundred and sixty thousand dollars annually for a total four-year contract amount not to exceed six hundred and forty thousand. My first question was whether this was AMI and it's not. This is our current current ones. So any other questions for staff. Okay, moving on to uh number eleven. Consider authorizing the city manager to approve a construction contract with three D paving and contracting for the Web Chapel Road reconstruction project and amount not to exceed three million nine hundred and forty-five dollars, eight hundred and three million nine hundred and forty-five, eight hundred and forty-five dollars even. It does have a four percent contingency in it. Yes. So I had a question just regarding how the comment in here about it being a part of the bond potential project for the bond. But yet we're not using bond money for this. I'm not clear on what happens there. So uh I think um partially bonded. No, it's partially bonded. Yeah. So it is partially bond funded. And then the utility side will be not bond funded. But okay, but I I thought I asked a question in the email and I was told that it was pego money that we were using. I think it's partial paygo, partial bond. Yes. Yeah, that's right. So it should be should it stay both bond dollars and the bond was coming from the utility fund. But bonds not from utility fund. Bond will be streets. And then the paygo will be utilities.