Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.

If you would please silence your cell phones and other devices.

I call this meeting to order at 6 30 p.m.

Uh, May 4th meeting of the planning and zoning commission of which seven of nine commissioners are present tonight, with Commissioner Kramer and Commissioner Taylor being absent.

The commission has final authority on certain items and an advisory role on others.

In the case of advisory items, the commission's recommendation for denial will be considered by the city council if the applicant makes a written request in accordance with city ordinance.

The commission conducts its business in accordance with the posted agenda, copies of which are in the lobby outside these chambers.

In accordance with the state open meetings act, the planning and zoning commission is restricted from discussing or taking action on items not listed on the agenda.

Approval of a subdivision plat or a replat is required by state law if the plat meets all applicable provisions of state law and the city of Carrollton's ordinances.

A plat is deemed approved by operation of law if no action to approve or deny a plat by the planning commission is taken within 30 days after a plat meeting.

All requirements is filed.

The public may comment on all items listed on the agenda for planning and zoning commission consideration.

If you wish to comment on any agenda item, please complete an appearance card located on the table at the entrance of the city council chambers.

The items on the agenda under the heading public hearing will be considered individually, beginning with a case presentation.

After any questions from the commission of staff and the applicant, the commission will provide an opportunity for individuals to speak on the case.

When it is your time to speak, please come forward to the podium, give your name and address for the record, and make your comments to the commission.

When everyone has had the opportunity to speak, the applicant will be given an opportunity to make a brief closing comment.

At that time, there will be no further opportunities for public testimony on that item.

The public hearing portions of the cases considered tonight are intended to

be

an opportunity for the public to be heard by the commission.

It is not an opportunity for the commission to respond to public testimony or answer questions from the public.

After the case presentations and public testimony period is completed, the commission will conduct any discussion action as appropriate.

Thank

you.

Agenda item number one is the minutes.

Agenda item number two is to take final action on a replat.

Is there anybody in the audience with comments for the consent agenda?

There being no public comments.

Are there any commissioners that have any comments about the consent agenda or would like to have an item pulled for individual consideration or wish to make a motion?

Yes,

Commissioner Doyle.

I uh move that we accept the consent agreement as written and published.

And

that's it.

Thank

you, Commissioner Doyle.

Do I have a second?

Yes,

Commissioner Powell.

I second the motion.

So the motion was made by Commissioner Doyle and seconded by Commissioner Powell to approve the consent agenda for items one and two.

Is there any discussion on the motion at this

time?

If not, then we'll move to a vote.

There you

go.

Okay, the motion is passed unanimous unanimously with two commissioners meeting.

So seven voted for to pass this.

Thank you very much.

Okay,

now moving on.

We'll proceed to the public hearing portion of the agenda, starting with item number three, which is to hold a public hearing to consider an ordinance amending the zoning to repeal plan development number 159 ordinance 2665 for an approximate 0.63 acre track located at 2775 East Trinity Mills Road and at the northwest corner of Marsh Lane and East Trinity Mills Road, amending the official official zoning map accordingly.

Yes,

Mr.

McCauley.

Thank you, Mr.

Chairman.

Members of the Commission, Mike McCauley Planning Department.

You mentioned this is a request to repeal PD 159 for this approximately two-thirds of an acre site with the retail zoning district on it.