OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Carson City, Nevada/Board of Supervisors
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Carson City Planning Commission Meeting — November 2, 2026

Board of Supervisors — Monday, November 2, 2026
BodyCarson City, Nevada
SessionBoard of Supervisors
DateMonday, November 2, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 12:42

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

1:59

It's November 2nd.

2:00

It's two PM, and this is the meeting of the Planning Commission of Carson City that I'd like to call to order.

2:07

Please call the roll, please.

2:10

Chair Borders.

2:11

Present.

Speaker 2

2:12

Vice Chair Cron.

2:13

Here.

2:14

Commissioner Brooks.

2:15

Commissioner DeChristopher.

Speaker 3

2:17

Here.

Speaker 2

2:17

Commissioner Peterson.

Speaker 3

2:18

Here.

Speaker 2

2:19

Commissioner Preston.

Unassigned speaker

2:20

And

Speaker 2

2:20

Commissioner Pizell.

2:22

Here.

2:22

We have a quorum.

Speaker 1

2:24

Thank you.

2:24

Commissioner Pizel, since you were not here the other day, you get to do the pledge, okay?

2:33

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands.

2:41

One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for

Unassigned speaker

2:46

all.

Speaker 4

2:48

Okay.

Speaker 1

2:53

The public is invited at this time to provide comments on any topic that is related to the matter over which this public body has supervision controlled jurisdiction or advisory power, including any such matter that is not specifically included on the agenda as an action item.

3:11

No action may be taken on any matter raised during this period for public comment.

3:20

Hearing none, we move to item five, possible action for minutes.

3:25

We don't have minutes.

4:02

Excuse me, APN zero one zero seven four one zero six.

Speaker 5

5:04

The portion of the easement um as shown here in red was never developed, and the new alignment of the right-of-way um as well as drainage and public utility easements have been dedicated on a new parcel map uh to accommodate future development.

5:22

The area being abandoned will revert back to the parcel where it is located.

Unassigned speaker

5:29

Um

Speaker 5

5:29

there are seven findings of fact the planning commission must make in order to recommend approval of the abandonment

Unassigned speaker

5:35

to

Speaker 5

5:35

the board of supervisors.

Unassigned speaker

5:37

Uh

Speaker 5

5:37

staff has made all seven findings and is recommending approval.

5:41

I'm available for questions, and the applicant's representative Ken Crater is also here.

Speaker 1

5:47

Are there questions for staff?

5:52

Commissioner Cron.

Speaker 4

5:53

Yeah, just uh kind of a real quick question for you.

5:56

At least I hope it's a quick question.

5:58

Um the did the other abandonment that we were talking about.

6:01

Uh, this is talking about a public utility easement as well as a um drainage easement.

6:08

Does this also include the road too, or how does that play into this?

Speaker 5

6:12

So the road right, the right-of-way abandonment was already

Speaker 4

6:16

approved.

6:17

Okay, so that's what we see in yellow and kind of orange.

Speaker 5

6:20

Uh the red is the location where the right-of-way abandonment was approved.

6:24

The um yellow and orange was that was another um abandonment that was done at the same time as

Unassigned speaker

6:31

well.

Speaker 4

6:32

Okay.

Speaker 5

6:32

Um, so um that that doesn't um play into this specifically.

6:39

Um, we're talking just about the red on this map.

Speaker 4

6:41

Okay, just wanted to be clear.

Speaker 5

6:43

Yep.

Speaker 1

6:45

There are any other questions for staff.

6:48

The applicant is

Unassigned speaker

6:50

here.

Unassigned speaker

6:52

Can

Speaker 1

6:52

you come forward, please,

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████52%
Land Use and Zoning██████████████████████████████████████████48%
Summary of Proceedings

Carson City Planning Commission Meeting — November 2, 2026

The Carson City Planning Commission met on November 2, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. with a quorum present; Chair Borders presided. The meeting included one substantive action item—a recommendation on abandonment of a drainage and public utility easement at 801 N Lompa Lane—and staff reports on the upcoming Master Plan matrix and department activities.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • The initial general public comment period drew no speakers.
  • Denny French of Carson City, Nevada, commented on AB-2026-0174. He said he had questions that Heather Paris helped answer, described the item as important cleanup and clarification, and raised a concern about the floodplain situation not being addressed in the item; he said he was told it was not an issue and that the developer would be responsible for mitigation.
  • During the final public comment period, Denny French encouraged the public to attend meetings in person if possible, saying eye contact and observing commissioners help communication; he also encouraged watching video of meetings when attendance is not possible.

Discussion Items

  • AB-2026-0174 — Easement abandonment, 801 N Lompa Lane (APN 010-741-06): Staff presented a request from CC Nevada, LLC to abandon a 78,359-square-foot drainage and public utility easement bisecting the parcel. Staff said the portion shown in red was never developed, new right-of-way and drainage/public utility easements were dedicated on a new parcel map to accommodate future development, and the abandoned area would revert to the parcel. Staff reported that all seven required findings had been made and recommended approval. Applicant representative Ken Crater, Crater Consulting Group, confirmed the four recommended conditions of approval were acceptable. Commissioner Cron asked whether the abandonment included the road; staff clarified that the road right-of-way abandonment had already been approved separately and this item concerned only the red drainage and public utility easement area.
  • Master Plan matrix and staff report: Hope Sullivan reported that the November meeting would include the Master Plan matrix as a work session and that she hoped to distribute it later that week, before formal Master Plan review in December. She described the matrix as the work program for implementing the Master Plan and encouraged commissioners to consider how they want to approach priorities, including possible listening sessions. Commissioner Pizell asked whether prior commissioner input had been incorporated; Sullivan said she would double-check and try to preserve prior input.
  • Department update: Sullivan reported that the Community Development team won a pumpkin-decorating contest judged by United Federal Credit Union, earning a free lunch for the department.

Key Outcomes

  • No minutes were available for approval under item 5.
  • The Commission moved to recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve the abandonment of the drainage and public utility easement based on the findings and subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report. The motion was seconded and carried with no stated opposition.
  • Sullivan was to provide the Master Plan matrix before the November work session and to check on prior commissioner input.
  • The meeting was adjourned following a motion and second, with no further discussion.

Meeting Transcript

It's November 2nd. It's two PM, and this is the meeting of the Planning Commission of Carson City that I'd like to call to order. Please call the roll, please. Chair Borders. Present. Vice Chair Cron. Here. Commissioner Brooks. Commissioner DeChristopher. Here. Commissioner Peterson. Here. Commissioner Preston. And Commissioner Pizell. Here. We have a quorum. Thank you. Commissioner Pizel, since you were not here the other day, you get to do the pledge, okay? I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Okay. The public is invited at this time to provide comments on any topic that is related to the matter over which this public body has supervision controlled jurisdiction or advisory power, including any such matter that is not specifically included on the agenda as an action item. No action may be taken on any matter raised during this period for public comment. Hearing none, we move to item five, possible action for minutes. We don't have minutes. Excuse me, APN zero one zero seven four one zero six. The portion of the easement um as shown here in red was never developed, and the new alignment of the right-of-way um as well as drainage and public utility easements have been dedicated on a new parcel map uh to accommodate future development. The area being abandoned will revert back to the parcel where it is located. Um there are seven findings of fact the planning commission must make in order to recommend approval of the abandonment to the board of supervisors. Uh staff has made all seven findings and is recommending approval. I'm available for questions, and the applicant's representative Ken Crater is also here. Are there questions for staff? Commissioner Cron. Yeah, just uh kind of a real quick question for you. At least I hope it's a quick question. Um the did the other abandonment that we were talking about. Uh, this is talking about a public utility easement as well as a um drainage easement. Does this also include the road too, or how does that play into this? So the road right, the right-of-way abandonment was already approved. Okay, so that's what we see in yellow and kind of orange. Uh the red is the location where the right-of-way abandonment was approved. The um yellow and orange was that was another um abandonment that was done at the same time as well.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com