OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Charlotte City Council Meeting – February 9, 2026

City CouncilMonday, February 9, 2026
BodyCharlotte, North Carolina
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, February 9, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:32:15

Transcript — Verbatim
2:27

Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the consent and action preview here with Charlotte City Council.

2:35

I'd like to thank everyone who are joining us here in person and those watching online.

2:40

Let's start with introductions going around the room, starting with our city clerk.

2:46

Ariel Smith, lead city clerk.

2:49

Terry Hagler Gray, Senior Assistant City Attorney.

2:52

Good evening.

2:53

I'm Victoria Wattlington, and I have the pleasure of serving you as a member at large.

2:57

Joy Mayo, representing District Three.

3:05

Kimberly Owens representing District Six.

3:11

Lawana Mayfield serving you, Council at Large.

3:14

JD and my sweater audio, probably representing East Side District Five.

3:17

JD must sweat on audience.

3:28

Yes, sir, and good evening, Mayor Pro Tim and Council.

3:31

I had a chance to speak with a few of you, and you'll see before you some questions and answers, additional information.

3:38

But before you vote, is there any other information that would be helpful to you this evening?

3:45

Council Member Mayfield.

3:47

Thank you, Mayor Pro S.

3:48

Marie, we were going over a couple of things earlier, and there was going to be some clarification that you want to check.

3:56

Is that in here in this updated one?

4:00

Yes, I remember Miss Mayfield.

4:02

So to not have you try to figure out through all my questions.

4:06

Number 26 regarding the Toby Creek Sanitary Sewer construction.

4:11

Yes, 26.

4:13

That ties to business item eleven, and the county will be um funding that.

5:00

I also had a question on number 36, which we have the public hearing on Somerville, Mountain Island Voluntary Annexation.

5:08

I wanted a little bit more clarification on one, Mayor Pro Tem and colleagues, the concern that I have is regarding the impact on the unincorporated area.

5:21

So this area by right can be built with 158 units plus I believe 14 single family.

5:28

Yet when you actually go to Mecklenburg County spatialists and you look at these properties and you look at the most adjacent property, I want to make sure that we're not causing the negative impact when we're looking at an annexation for a large swath of land because you have believe it's like four or five owners, but then those that are unincorporated that are still on that same line are not going to get access to some of the services that the city provide, whether it's sewer water, but also the impact of those residents during construction.

6:08

We've had we've all received emails from where the construction time, the construction site, where the construction workers part, the impact that it has in area.

6:20

So I wanted to the question that I sent to Maria as well as copied all my colleagues on is how exactly will the other neighbors be notified of because this is for us to set the public hearing meeting.

6:33

How would they be notified if we only go 300 feet?

6:36

And in theory, 300 feet are just the owners.

6:38

So how are the other residents going to know that this is going to be happening?

6:47

Yes, ma'am.

6:47

And to your point, other residents, this is a notice and it will be posted.

6:53

Um and I sorry I forget which uh venue will be posted in, but it'll be posted in print as well as online that it's upcoming.

7:01

I think it will be helpful if we take the additional step step of making sure that we mail to the residents that are outside of these particular parcel owners so that they are aware of this public hearing and have the opportunity to come down since it is an unincorporated area.

7:20

They not might not necessarily know all of the processes, and we want to make sure that their voices are heard.

7:25

And I think that's something on staff side that we should be able to accommodate.

7:30

Yes, I'm not sure about how many people we can mail out, but we are I forgot to mention we also have signage, but um, we have Holly here, and she can be more specific.

7:40

I'm sorry, I'm fumbling around, but she's the expert on how the process rolls now.

7:44

The notifications are.

7:45

Oh, you're not from me.

7:47

Come on up, Miss Holly.

7:48

Notifications are yeah, annexation petitions, Holly Kramer planning, annexation petitions a little bit different from rezoning where we do have that 300 foot boundary.

8:03

Annexation petitions don't have the same statute requirements that we do for noticing.

8:09

So we have to post the notice in the Mecklenburg Times 10 days before the public hearing, and that's what we do.

8:16

We also send out notice to our departments that might service the annexation, and we also notice any municipalities that we border about the potential annexation, but this is a voluntary annexation brought forward by the property owners themselves.

8:31

So in terms of our policy that we've had for a couple decades and statutes, we've never done noticing to adjacent property owners.

8:41

I can talk to the petitioner and ask what conversations they've had with their neighbors, though, and see what can be done ahead of the public hearing.

8:50

So, council members, I would like for us to recognize that we have the ability to look at not always doing what we've always done.

9:00

So, what we just heard is that based on our policy for many years that it has not been necessarily a different type of outreach because we have several individuals that want to annex, our concern should also be about those who aren't interested in being annexed into the city.

9:21

So we have the ability to direct the manager to make sure that notifications actually goes out because truth be told, how many of us on this table read Mecklenburg Times?

9:33

Does everybody even know what the Mecklenburg Times is?

9:36

So there's two of us that know what Mecklenburg Times is.

9:39

The question is if that is not a source that is readily and widely known, that's a great way to bury the lead to have the information out there to say, well, we presented the information, we posted it, but who is actually going to read it to see it?

10:00

There very well may be members that live in the unincorporated area that are familiar with the Mecklenburg Times, but I think if we're going to be setting a public hearing, we have the opportunity to ensure that everyone that may be impacted should be aware that this conversation is happening.

10:14

Should be aware that this conversation is happening.

10:17

So Holly and Stab to Councilmember Mayfield, can that be a takeaway for staff to bring back to us and to look how we can communicate with all the residents fashion annexation area?

10:30

Communicate.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use and Development██████████████████████████████30%
Public Safety██████████████████18%
Public Engagement██████████10%
Procedural████████8%
Environmental Protection████████8%
Affordable Housing██████6%
Community Engagement██████6%
Transportation Planning███3%
Economic Development███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Charlotte City Council Meeting – February 9, 2026

The Charlotte City Council convened on February 9, 2026, for a consent and action preview followed by the regular business meeting. The council addressed a wide range of items, including voluntary annexation notification procedures, tree canopy preservation land acquisitions, a transit-oriented development project in Five Points, the 2026 state and federal legislative agenda, and amendments to the health and sanitation ordinance. Several motions were passed, and key items were deferred to the February 23 business meeting.

Consent Calendar

  • Items 14–45 were approved with the following exceptions: Items 42 and 43 were deferred to February 23; Item 44 was settled; Items 32, 33, and 34 (land acquisition for tree canopy preservation) were pulled for separate vote and discussion.
  • The consent agenda motion passed unanimously after friendly amendments to exclude the deferred and pulled items.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Alvin Picard (Charlotte Coalition to Protect Our Urban Nature) spoke in favor of the proposed amendment to the health and sanitation ordinance, highlighting the ecological benefits of naturalistic landscapes and native plants for pollinators and wildlife.
  • Dr. Terrell Mackey (Alden) also supported the amendment, citing mental health and traffic safety benefits of green spaces, and urged the council to approve the codification of pollinator gardens.

Discussion Items

  • Voluntary Annexation (Somerville, Mountain Island – Item 36): Councilmember Mayfield raised concerns about inadequate notification to residents in the unincorporated area adjacent to the annexation. Staff explained that current noticing is limited to property owners and publication in the Mecklenburg Times. Council directed staff to explore additional outreach methods to ensure all potentially affected residents are informed before the public hearing.
  • Tree Canopy Preservation Land Acquisition (Items 32, 33, 34): Council debated the $601,000 purchase of three riverfront properties (1.6 acres total) using developer-paid fee-in-lieu funds. Councilmembers Mayfield and Johnson questioned the valuation, noting that the appraised market value (recent within six months) exceeded tax values and that the market has slowed. Staff clarified that the properties are buildable lots, the appraisals are current, and a deferral could risk losing the contract. A motion to defer to February 23 passed 6–2.
  • Five Points Transit-Oriented Development Land Acquisition: Staff presented a request for $4.13 million in short-term funding from the TOD fund and Housing Trust Fund to acquire a 1.25-acre site near Johnson C. Smith University for a mixed-use, mixed-income project (up to 145 units, including a grocery store). Council members expressed strong support, praising the community partnership and the model for preventing displacement. A final vote was scheduled for February 23.
  • State and Federal Legislative Agenda: Councilmember Ashmere presented the committee-approved agenda, emphasizing public safety priorities: mental health investments, law enforcement recruitment/retention, juvenile detention center re-establishment, and stronger penalties for assaults on transit operators. Discussion included red-light cameras (Councilmember Owens advocated for exploring options), inclusionary zoning, and support for Senate Bill 349 on aging in place. The agenda will return for adoption on February 23.
  • Health and Sanitation Ordinance Amendments (Policy Item 10): The council adopted amendments to codify pollinator gardens and naturalistic landscapes, allowing native plant growth above 12 inches with registration. Councilmember Johnson asked about HOA education; staff committed to a comprehensive outreach campaign using social media, videos, and direct mail.
  • Norland Road Shared Use Path (Item 13): The council approved a $1,250,258.35 contract for Phase 1 of the shared-use path, following a deferral from January 12. Councilmember JD asked about notification during construction and the possibility of upgrading an adjacent four-foot sidewalk to six feet using contingency funds. Staff will report back by end of March with cost scenarios.
  • Starwood Avenue Covenants (Item 12): The council approved an amendment extending the timeline for affordable for-sale townhomes to July 31, 2027. Councilmember JD asked about safeguards against indefinite delays; staff noted improved due diligence and a database of orphan roads.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Agenda: Approved with exceptions (items 32,33,34 deferred; 42,43 deferred; 44 settled).
  • Public Hearings: Closed for Mezzic Agency, Pacific Life Insurance, Scout Motors, and Sofire Technology business investment grants; all grants approved.
  • Policy Item: Health and sanitation ordinance amendments adopted unanimously.
  • Business Items:
    • Interlocal agreement for Mallard Creek Stream Restoration approved.
    • Starwood Avenue covenant extension approved.
    • Norland Road Shared Use Path contract approved.
    • Items 32, 33, 34 deferred to February 23 for further information.
  • Upcoming: Final votes on Five Points land acquisition and state/federal legislative agenda scheduled for February 23 business meeting.
  • Closed Session: Council entered closed session under NCGS 143-318.11(a)(4) to discuss economic development incentives.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the consent and action preview here with Charlotte City Council. I'd like to thank everyone who are joining us here in person and those watching online. Let's start with introductions going around the room, starting with our city clerk. Ariel Smith, lead city clerk. Terry Hagler Gray, Senior Assistant City Attorney. Good evening. I'm Victoria Wattlington, and I have the pleasure of serving you as a member at large. Joy Mayo, representing District Three. Kimberly Owens representing District Six. Lawana Mayfield serving you, Council at Large. JD and my sweater audio, probably representing East Side District Five. JD must sweat on audience. Yes, sir, and good evening, Mayor Pro Tim and Council. I had a chance to speak with a few of you, and you'll see before you some questions and answers, additional information. But before you vote, is there any other information that would be helpful to you this evening? Council Member Mayfield. Thank you, Mayor Pro S. Marie, we were going over a couple of things earlier, and there was going to be some clarification that you want to check. Is that in here in this updated one? Yes, I remember Miss Mayfield. So to not have you try to figure out through all my questions. Number 26 regarding the Toby Creek Sanitary Sewer construction. Yes, 26. That ties to business item eleven, and the county will be um funding that. I also had a question on number 36, which we have the public hearing on Somerville, Mountain Island Voluntary Annexation. I wanted a little bit more clarification on one, Mayor Pro Tem and colleagues, the concern that I have is regarding the impact on the unincorporated area. So this area by right can be built with 158 units plus I believe 14 single family. Yet when you actually go to Mecklenburg County spatialists and you look at these properties and you look at the most adjacent property, I want to make sure that we're not causing the negative impact when we're looking at an annexation for a large swath of land because you have believe it's like four or five owners, but then those that are unincorporated that are still on that same line are not going to get access to some of the services that the city provide, whether it's sewer water, but also the impact of those residents during construction. We've had we've all received emails from where the construction time, the construction site, where the construction workers part, the impact that it has in area. So I wanted to the question that I sent to Maria as well as copied all my colleagues on is how exactly will the other neighbors be notified of because this is for us to set the public hearing meeting. How would they be notified if we only go 300 feet? And in theory, 300 feet are just the owners. So how are the other residents going to know that this is going to be happening? Yes, ma'am. And to your point, other residents, this is a notice and it will be posted. Um and I sorry I forget which uh venue will be posted in, but it'll be posted in print as well as online that it's upcoming. I think it will be helpful if we take the additional step step of making sure that we mail to the residents that are outside of these particular parcel owners so that they are aware of this public hearing and have the opportunity to come down since it is an unincorporated area. They not might not necessarily know all of the processes, and we want to make sure that their voices are heard. And I think that's something on staff side that we should be able to accommodate. Yes, I'm not sure about how many people we can mail out, but we are I forgot to mention we also have signage, but um, we have Holly here, and she can be more specific. I'm sorry, I'm fumbling around, but she's the expert on how the process rolls now. The notifications are. Oh, you're not from me. Come on up, Miss Holly. Notifications are yeah, annexation petitions, Holly Kramer planning, annexation petitions a little bit different from rezoning where we do have that 300 foot boundary. Annexation petitions don't have the same statute requirements that we do for noticing. So we have to post the notice in the Mecklenburg Times 10 days before the public hearing, and that's what we do. We also send out notice to our departments that might service the annexation, and we also notice any municipalities that we border about the potential annexation, but this is a voluntary annexation brought forward by the property owners themselves. So in terms of our policy that we've had for a couple decades and statutes, we've never done noticing to adjacent property owners. I can talk to the petitioner and ask what conversations they've had with their neighbors, though, and see what can be done ahead of the public hearing.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com