Charlotte City Council Business Meeting - February 23, 2026
Charlotte City Council Business Meeting - February 23, 2026
The Charlotte City Council held a business meeting on February 23, 2026, beginning with a public forum where 12 speakers addressed the council. The primary topic was the I-77 South toll lane expansion project, with many residents, community leaders, and organizational representatives expressing opposition and calling for a pause. The council also discussed and voted on consent agenda items, a historic landmark designation, a lease agreement, an affordable housing development support, and an interlocal agreement for risk management services. The meeting concluded with a closed session.
Consent Calendar
- The council approved consent agenda items 13 through 38, with the exception of items 33, 34, 35, and 36 (which were deferred or settled). The vote was unanimous.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Philip Stanford (Charlotte Running community): Expressed concern over pedestrian safety and the need for better infrastructure and enforcement, citing the death of Lance Witello and five other pedestrian fatalities. Called for higher DOT budget allocations for non-drivers.
- Logan Creech (Secretary, Washington Heights neighborhood): Criticized the failed placemaking initiative at the Ritz of Washington Heights, asking council to pressure the Urban Design Department for better oversight and programming.
- Mike Phoenix (Charlotte Firefighters Association): Requested approval of budget requests including five additional modified duty positions and pay parity with CMPD to improve recruitment and retention.
- Jackie Adams (District 8 resident): Supported increasing the animal care and control budget, sharing her positive experience fostering dogs and highlighting the need for adequate staffing.
- Susanna Trotter (District 6 resident, volunteer at Charlotte Mecklenburg Animal Care and Control): Thanked council for past budget support, noted improvements in volunteer processes, and urged continued funding to close staffing gaps and achieve a 90%+ live release rate.
- Shannon Bins (Founder, Sustained Charlotte): Spoke in strong opposition to the I-77 South toll lane project, submitting a petition with nearly 1,300 signatures. Accused NCDOT of a "bait and switch" and lack of transparency, and called on council to use their influence to pause the project.
- Shauna Bell (Macquarie Heights resident): Opposed the I-77 expansion, citing concerns about cost, equity, environmental impact, and historical harm to Black neighborhoods. Asked council to call for a pause and meaningful community engagement.
- Vera Faulkner (Housing Justice Coalition): Demanded a stop to displacement from airport lease negotiations, calling for a 90-day public review period, a living wage for subcontracted workers, a displacement mitigation fund, and community grants.
- Sean Langley: Opposed the I-77 expansion, arguing the NCDOT survey was biased and that the project contradicts climate goals and economic mobility efforts. Urged council to pause and study alternatives.
- Ann Brooks (Charlotte Regional Business Alliance): Argued against stopping the project, stating that community concerns can be addressed while moving forward, and that a pause would waste planning already done.
- Damian Smith (District 3, Lakeview neighborhood): Opposed the I-77 toll lanes, noting they primarily benefit out-of-state commuters. Also supported firefighter pay raises.
- Evan Sultotis: Opposed the elevated toll lanes, citing personal accident experience and proposing low-cost alternatives. Warned that the project would increase costs for the Silver Line transit.
- Mark Wilson (Secretary, Charlotte Firefighters Association): Called on council to address a public safety crisis in the fire department, citing poor pay and benefits compared to comparable cities, hurting recruitment and retention.
- Dr. Janet Gardner Mullins (representing West Boulevard and Wilkinson Boulevard corridor residents): Highlighted displacement from highway expansion and airport growth, urging anti-displacement policies and urgent action.
- Sharif Hanan: Criticized the I-77 plan as a "segregated highway for the rich," questioned the public-private partnership, and called for reevaluating the council's CRTPO representative and exploring alternative funding.
Discussion Items
I-77 South Toll Lane Expansion
- Mayor Lyles acknowledged public frustration, clarified that the city cannot unilaterally stop the project (led by NCDOT), but committed to taking feedback to state leaders. Referred the item to the March 5 Transportation Planning and Development Committee with NCDOT invited.
- City Attorney Andrea Leslie Fight explained the legal framework: the project is a state-designated interstate project; CRTPO's 2014 vote and subsequent P3 authorization advanced the process; the city cannot single-handedly reverse the regional vote. She noted remaining steps: RFP (March 13), NEPA process, and community engagement.
- Councilmember Renee Johnson moved to add the I-77 item to the night's agenda for discussion and potential action. The motion failed (7-4, not unanimous). She then moved to place it on a future agenda, but later withdrew after consensus to discuss it at the council retreat on Monday, February 24.
- Councilmember Malcolm Graham supported a 60-day pause, citing misalignment among community, council, CRTPO, and NCDOT. He urged a special meeting or retreat discussion to direct the city's CRTPO representative to seek a delay.
- Councilmember JD Masuera Adias (District 5): Supported a pause, calling toll lanes "classist" and emphasizing the need for transparency, environmental justice, and alignment with equity goals.
- Councilmember Ed Driggs (District 7): Cautioned that a 60-day pause could jeopardize $600 million in state funds and $100 million in local road projects. Advocated using influence with NCDOT rather than trying to obstruct the process.
- Councilmember Kimberly Owens (District 6): Expressed frustration, questioned the project's benefits, and called for exploring alternatives to toll roads (e.g., managed routes, BRT, truck lanes). Stressed the need to avoid displacement and to show that benefits outweigh harms.
- Councilmember Dante Anderson (District 1): Thanked the community for engagement and urged them to also speak to state leaders.
- Councilmember Victoria Watlington: Supported the pause and noted that the council must work through CRTPO bylaws to get the item on the agenda.
- Councilmember Dimple Ajmira (At-Large): Emphasized that issuing an RFP is not destiny and that the council should explore options with NCDOT and the governor's office. She called for a pause to fully evaluate financial liability, equity impacts, and alternatives.
- The council reached consensus to place the I-77 discussion on the retreat agenda for Monday, February 24.
Other Business Items
- Item 13 (2025 Urban Area Security Initiative grant): Councilmember Masuera Adias clarified that the grant is for disaster preparedness, not immigration enforcement, and is federal funds.
- Item 28 (SCAP+ implementation consulting services): Confirmed that five of the vendors have a local presence and that funds will be used for green print projects in heat-burdened neighborhoods.
- Item 8 (Lease with Envision Charlotte): Council approved a lease agreement for a portion of city-owned property at 3300 Northerly Road for $1 annually. Discussion included questions about revenue ($19,500 total over five years), lack of an RFQ for renewal, and comparison to other nonprofit leases.
- Item 9 (Affordable housing development support for Five Points land acquisition): Approved unanimously. Council members praised the project for bringing mixed-use, transit-oriented development, a co-op grocery store, and affordable housing to the historic West End, led by community partners like Jatanya Adams and LISC.
- Item 10 (Interlocal agreement for risk management services with MPTA): Approved. Council discussed the scope of services, reimbursement, and the transition period through FY27.
Key Outcomes
- I-77 Project: The council agreed to discuss the I-77 project at the February 24 retreat, with many members supporting a 60-day pause. No formal vote was taken on the project itself.
- Consent Agenda: Approved (items 13-38 with exceptions).
- Public Hearing: Closed the public hearing and adopted an ordinance designating the R. Kent and Gertrude Blair House as a historic landmark (effective February 23, 2026).
- Legislative Agendas: Approved the 2026 federal and state legislative agendas, which include priorities on public safety, juvenile detention, and housing.
- Installment Financing Contract: Approved a resolution setting a public hearing for March 9, 2026, for an installment financing contract not to exceed $120 million for equipment and facilities, including public safety and animal care and control.
- Lease Agreement with Envision Charlotte: Approved.
- Affordable Housing Development Support: Approved for Five Points land acquisition.
- Interlocal Agreement with MPTA: Approved for risk management services.
- Closed Session: The council voted to enter closed session to discuss economic development incentives.
Meeting Transcript
We never made it a big thing of you need to conform to how corporate America says you need to look. You could still be who you are and still be very professional. I've had plenty of clients that have encountered it, or they would say, Hey La Monica, let's make sure I do a little bit more of a laid back professional look when I go into the interview, and then bam, I'm gonna surprise them with who I really am. You don't have to conform to what the uh to what society says you need to look like. Um, you can just be as beautiful as you are wearing your natural hair, and you can still have a CFO job if you want to have an eight-year-old, and I want her to understand that her natural hair is beautiful. She doesn't have to always wear weaves. If that's an option, you can, but just remember that your foundation of what God has made you be made you into is just is beautiful. And you can wear your natural hair as much as you like any way that you like, and I'm gonna go to the house. Everyone, good afternoon. Good afternoon. Good afternoon, everyone. Good afternoon. Good afternoon. Thank you for very much. I'd like to now call the run of our business meeting, the Charlotte City Council Business Meeting call to order. We are going to begin with introductions. Let's begin with introductions with our clerk, and we'll come around the dais. Good evening, Stephanie Kelly, City Clerk. Good evening, Andrea Leslie Fight, City Attorney. Good evening, Dimple Ajmira, at large member. Good evening. I'm Victoria Watlington, and I have the pleasure of serving you as a member at large. Joy Mayo, representing District 3. Dante Anderson, District 1. Marcus Jones, City Manager. By Lyles Mayor. Good evening, everyone. Jane Smith and Mayor Pro Tim. Kimberly Owens representing District 6. Malcolm Graham, District 2. Ed Driggs, District 7. JD Masuera Adias, probably representing the East Side, District 5. Okay. Good evening. I'm Renee Johnson and I have the honor of representing District 4. All right. Do we have everyone and everyone's had the opportunity to do this? We begin our meetings with an invocation, an expression or inspiration, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. This invocation is intended to solemnize our proceedings to make sure that we are working together. So including we celebrate religious diversity in our community, including those without a religious faith. Tonight we'll have Council Member Owens to deliver our invocation. Thank you, Mayor. Good evening, everyone. As we gather here today for the city council meeting, let us take a moment to reflect on our shared purpose and responsibility to this community we cherish. We stand at a pivotal moment in our city's history, one that challenges us to embody the values of integrity, service, and solidarity. The legacy of our past decisions still echoes within our neighborhoods, reminding us of the importance of careful thought and compassion in all that we do. Many of our communities have felt the impact of choices made for reasons that may not have prioritized their needs, and it's our duty to address those past harms. Let us strive to do what is right, even if no one is looking. Each one of us holds the capacity to effect positive change and to be a source of hope for our residents. As we deliberate today, let us commit to listening to the voices of those who have been marginalized and to ensuring that our decisions reflect our community's values.
openpublica.com