OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Charlotte, North Carolina/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Charlotte City Council Special Meeting: Airline Use and Lease Agreement Veto Override Fails (October 19, 2026)

City Council — Monday, October 19, 2026
BodyCharlotte, North Carolina
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, October 19, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 10:33

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

4:25

Now call this meeting to order.

4:28

Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us here in person and those watching online.

4:33

Let's start with introductions going around the room, starting with Council Member Masara Arias.

Speaker 2

4:40

Council Member J.D.

4:41

Masueta audio is probably representing East Charlotte District Five.

Speaker 3

4:44

Good afternoon.

Victoria Watlington · Speaker 4Inferred

4:57

Joy Mayo, representing District Three.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

Good afternoon.

Victoria Watlington · Speaker 4Inferred

5:00

I'm Victoria Watlington, and I have the pleasure of serving you as a member at large.

Speaker 1

5:04

Okay, the purpose of today's special

Speaker 3

5:07

Wow, yes

Victoria Watlington · Speaker 4Inferred

5:08

after

Speaker 3

5:08

them.

5:09

We have two more people.

Speaker 1

5:16

All right, now we'll try to do this better.

5:19

All right.

5:20

The purpose of today's four o'clock special meeting is for council to reconsider the motion made at the October 12th action preview meeting regarding the airline use and lease agreement.

5:32

That motion provided for a period of review and a council decision at the November 23rd council business meeting.

5:39

I vetoed that motion and I maintain my position on that veto.

5:43

However, the city charter requires council to reconsider any motion that has been vetoed by the mayor at its next meeting, which is where we are.

Unassigned speaker

5:52

Today's special meeting is limited to that this item and the city charter requires at least seven affirmative votes to override and readopt the override the veto and readopt the motion.

Speaker 1

6:04

Before council votes on this item, we will open the floor for public comments.

6:09

Are there any speakers that have been signed up to make public comment?

Victoria Watlington · Speaker 4Inferred

6:12

No, sir.

Speaker 1

6:13

Okay.

6:14

So we don't have any speakers that are signed up.

6:17

Uh therefore we will move to whether there is a motion to readopt the October 12th motion to have a period for review and a decision to be made by this council at the November 23rd business meeting regarding the airline use and lease agreement.

6:34

In essence, a motion to override the mayor's veto.

6:37

Is there such a motion?

6:44

All right.

6:45

I think the item fails for want of a motion.

6:48

Madam City Attorney, is there anything else we should consider?

Speaker 5

6:51

Nothing else, sir.

Speaker 1

6:52

Okay.

6:53

The uh item has been agended and considered by council at this special meeting of the city council.

Unassigned speaker

6:59

There is not a motion at this meeting to override the motion the uh veto and readopt the motion, and therefore it has been heard, duly considered, and the veto stands.

Speaker 1

7:12

Is that correct, madam city attorney?

7:14

Correct, sir.

7:14

And madam clerk.

7:16

Yes.

7:17

Okay.

7:17

All right.

7:18

Is there a if there is a motion, we'll have a motion.

Speaker 6

7:24

Is there is a motion in order at this point to schedule the vote, or would that be out of order at this meeting?

Speaker 5

7:29

No, the motion failed for lack of action at this point.

7:32

Sorry.

Speaker 6

7:32

So there can't be any other motions.

Speaker 5

7:34

No.

Speaker 6

7:34

Okay.

7:35

We're done, right?

Speaker 1

7:36

Okay, is there is there a motion to adjourn?

7:38

So are there any questions?

7:40

Councilmember Dr.

7:42

Wadlington.

Victoria Watlington · Speaker 4Inferred

7:42

Um I apologize for the delay on this one, but I wanted to make sure I was clear about the procedure.

7:49

Um, could you please read the motion specifically that because I wasn't clear whether or not we were voting on the very same motion and it be override, or if we were presenting a motion for another date in lieu of the original?

8:03

I wasn't clear.

Speaker 1

8:04

So let me let me try to let me take a stab at it and then I'll ask the clerk if necessary to read the motion that was that was vetoed.

8:12

Um, and then ask the city attorney if she has any questions.

8:15

And so there was a I vetoed the motion to set the hearing on or to set the decision on the airline lease.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████100%
Summary of Proceedings

Charlotte City Council Special Meeting – October 19, 2026

The Charlotte City Council held a special meeting at 4:00 p.m. on Monday, October 19, 2026, in the Council Chamber of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Government Center, solely to reconsider Mayor Robert Harrington’s veto of a Council motion made at the October 12, 2026 Action Preview regarding the Airline Use and Lease Agreement. The vetoed motion would have created a review period and set a Council decision for the November 23, 2026 business meeting. Under the City Charter, overriding the veto required at least seven affirmative votes. No Council member made a motion to readopt the measure, so the veto stood.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public speakers were signed up. The Mayor opened the floor for public comment, and no one came forward.

Discussion Items

  • Mayor Harrington stated he continued to maintain his position on the veto, but noted the City Charter required the Council to reconsider the vetoed motion at its next regular or special meeting. He had noticed the special meeting on October 16 because the next regular business meeting was not until October 26.
  • Agenda background noted that the original October 12 motion was made by Councilmember Ajmera, seconded by Councilmember Mazuera Arias, and passed 6–5 (Ajmera, Mazuera Arias, Johnson, Mayo, Owens, and Watlington in favor; Mitchell, Anderson, Driggs, Graham, and Mayfield opposed). Mayor Harrington then vetoed it.
  • Councilmember Victoria Watlington asked whether the Council was voting on the identical motion to override the veto or could consider a different date. Mayor Harrington clarified that the only action before the Council was a motion to readopt the November 23 motion, i.e., a motion to override the veto.
  • No Council member offered such a motion. The City Attorney confirmed that the item had been considered and that the veto stands; no other motions were in order after the item failed for lack of action.
  • Mayor Harrington added that if no motion was made, the veto would stand and he intended to set the decision on the lease for November 9, 2026, as previously announced.

Key Outcomes

  • The motion to readopt the October 12 motion did not receive a Council sponsor, so the veto of the November 23 decision timeline was sustained.
  • The Airline Use and Lease Agreement decision was not scheduled for the November 23 Council business meeting by this action.
  • Mayor Harrington stated his intent to place the lease decision on the November 9, 2026 agenda.
  • The Council adjourned after handling the single agenda item.

Meeting Transcript

Now call this meeting to order. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us here in person and those watching online. Let's start with introductions going around the room, starting with Council Member Masara Arias. Council Member J.D. Masueta audio is probably representing East Charlotte District Five. Good afternoon. Joy Mayo, representing District Three. Good afternoon. I'm Victoria Watlington, and I have the pleasure of serving you as a member at large. Okay, the purpose of today's special Wow, yes after them. We have two more people. All right, now we'll try to do this better. All right. The purpose of today's four o'clock special meeting is for council to reconsider the motion made at the October 12th action preview meeting regarding the airline use and lease agreement. That motion provided for a period of review and a council decision at the November 23rd council business meeting. I vetoed that motion and I maintain my position on that veto. However, the city charter requires council to reconsider any motion that has been vetoed by the mayor at its next meeting, which is where we are. Today's special meeting is limited to that this item and the city charter requires at least seven affirmative votes to override and readopt the override the veto and readopt the motion. Before council votes on this item, we will open the floor for public comments. Are there any speakers that have been signed up to make public comment? No, sir. Okay. So we don't have any speakers that are signed up. Uh therefore we will move to whether there is a motion to readopt the October 12th motion to have a period for review and a decision to be made by this council at the November 23rd business meeting regarding the airline use and lease agreement. In essence, a motion to override the mayor's veto. Is there such a motion? All right. I think the item fails for want of a motion. Madam City Attorney, is there anything else we should consider? Nothing else, sir. Okay. The uh item has been agended and considered by council at this special meeting of the city council. There is not a motion at this meeting to override the motion the uh veto and readopt the motion, and therefore it has been heard, duly considered, and the veto stands. Is that correct, madam city attorney? Correct, sir. And madam clerk. Yes. Okay. All right. Is there a if there is a motion, we'll have a motion. Is there is a motion in order at this point to schedule the vote, or would that be out of order at this meeting? No, the motion failed for lack of action at this point. Sorry. So there can't be any other motions. No. Okay. We're done, right?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com