Chattanooga City Council Meeting - March 17, 2026: Liquor Store Regulations, Council Rules, and HR Committee Discussion
Chattanooga City Council Meeting - March 17, 2026
The Chattanooga City Council met on March 17, 2026, to discuss a wide range of topics including strengthening special exceptions permits for liquor stores, council voting requirements, a potential HR committee, public comment procedures, a council policy position, and ethics complaint rules. Key decisions included moving forward with drafting an ordinance for liquor store regulations and tabling the HR committee.
Consent Calendar
- The council approved the minutes from the March 3, 2026 meeting without objection via a motion and second.
Discussion Items
- Liquor Store Special Exceptions & Spacing Requirements: City staff member Phil presented options for strengthening liquor store regulations. Discussion focused on spacing distances (currently 200 feet, with options to revert to 500 feet or increase to 1,000 feet), per capita caps (one per 3,000 people, currently 42 stores, cap at 60), and incorporating crime data within a half-mile radius. Council members debated including offense types and ensuring standards are objective to avoid legal challenges. Councilwoman Dotley emphasized using specific thresholds like average crime rates. Council agreed to send individual feedback to Phil by March 31, with a draft ordinance expected by mid-April. The council also expressed interest in later applying similar rules to vape and smoke shops.
- Five-Vote Requirement: Council discussed Phil's recommendation that five votes be required for any council action. Members considered scenarios of extended absences and potential emergency provisions. Councilman Elliott raised concerns about a quorum without five votes halting business. The council agreed to explore adding emergency language referencing the mayor's powers, but no final decision was made.
- HR Committee: Councilman Clark proposed resurrecting an HR committee to handle employee complaints. Councilman Harvey and others argued HR is an executive function and that existing appeal processes (administrative law judges) suffice. Councilwoman Dotley clarified that council only handles termination appeals. The council voted to table the idea for now.
- Public Comment Procedure: Councilwoman Burris suggested a voluntary sign-in sheet to acknowledge large groups. Vice Chairwoman Noah and Councilman Elliott recommended keeping it at the chair's discretion. Council agreed to improve communication by having the chair announce procedures at the start of meetings, but no rule changes were adopted.
- Council Policy Position (Councilman Elliott): Elliott announced he would compile final feedback on a proposed council policy position resolution, seeking responses by March 18, with a vote anticipated in two weeks.
- Council Rules / Code of Ethics: Councilwoman Dotley presented a draft process for ethics complaints against council members, based on the city charter. The process includes an initial review by the chief ethics officer, a public council vote on merit, and potential investigation. Councilman Harvey asked about penalties (public censure, possible ouster by courts). The council agreed to add the process to the council rules for transparency.
- America's 250th Celebration: Councilman Henderson announced a committee preparing liberty bills and requested displaying a replica on the council yard, which received no objections.
Key Outcomes
- Liquor Store Regulations: Council directed staff to draft an ordinance amending spacing and crime-related requirements, with feedback due March 31 and draft by mid-April. Vape shop regulations to follow separately.
- HR Committee: Tabled with no further action.
- Public Comment Procedure: No formal changes; chair will proactively communicate process to large groups.
- Council Policy Position: Councilman Elliott to produce a final resolution for a vote within two weeks.
- Ethics Complaint Rules: Councilwoman Dotley to refine the draft and add initial review committee details for inclusion in council rules.
- America's 250th: Display of liberty bill replica approved.
Meeting Transcript
Meeting for the China City Council March 17th, 2026. Can I get a motion on our minutes from the third of March, please? So move. Second. Okay. We are going to let the minutes stand without objection. Thanks, everybody. Okay, we have a lot of council business to work on today. So let's go ahead and start with Phil giving us some updates on special exceptions permits, what our options are here. Looks like you've got some things to pack out. I do. Karen has been very nice about making copies for everyone here. Thank you. What types of things she thought would be something for us to discuss here regarding the strategic planning aspect of liquor stores. And y'all last time around were saying that you might want to deal with some other items here that are not necessarily special exceptions, but things that you might want to consider that the planning agency would bring to you as opposed to just making a decision itself. So we were trying to make sure at least there is a requirement in a uh just a setting that we had for locations in the city for liquor stores to have uh some type of action by the council. But that's really the only reference that there was in the code. This uh handout that I've given you is what was looked at in connection with uh the one I guess uh case that you had before you last week here, and these are the types of items that were included on that list. And I guess the question becomes uh do you need to have uh any other uh items that you're gonna look for in an area regarding a liquor store and whether you think that that would be something that would be compliant with the I guess the uh public safety in an area here, what types of offenses would you like to look at in connection with those cases? So we got um drug offenses, uh theft offenses here included last time around, and some of those are and some of them are not related to liquor store operations. So that's that's the question about what would you like to have in the so council just a reminder as a council we have agreed that we do want to maintain the requirement of council approving certain types of uses through special exceptions permits. So our goal with this conversation and what what Phil has been researching is how might we strengthen this so that it is less susceptible to being challenged successfully in a court of law. We want this to be a stronger. So, Phil, if I'm hearing you correctly, what you're saying is here's a whole list of different things that we might add to our requirements for the review. Um, a lot of those that councilwoman Dotley had done research on for one that came in district seven. So is this kind of a talk through that and maybe check the boxes and do a check the box on which ones you think are important, which ones not in the operation of the liquor store. Uh the other things that we also discussed, we had a pretty lengthy discussion with the planning people and the police department folks yesterday here concerning this matter. And uh, do you want to keep your spacing the way that you've got it? Because we reduced the spacing requirements down to just 200 feet, and does that 200 feet uh work with what you're looking for on here? We have other different types of establishments here in the city that have uh higher distance restrictions than that, but if you want to have that, the distance restrictions did not apply in the urban areas right downtown to begin with under the form-based code. If it was under the form-based code, those uh uh 500-foot restrictions were not applicable. But if if you want to consider other areas, then that's possible uh that it makes it easier to get your numbers, at least that you're looking at about what is the crime like in the area. You have to be careful about going too large in size to the area as well, because if you do, you may be looking at other uh locations that may be completely away from uh the the area you're trying to protect. Okay, so those are those are some of the things we're looking at. And so as we um strengthen our requirements for these types of applications, we can then use that as a pattern for others that we consider related to vape shops and things like that, correct? Yes. Okay, all right, council councilman Elliott. When you're talking about spacing, are you talking about in between two of the same two of the same of the same type of businesses or certain businesses that you think may need to have protection from that? Uh the argument always comes out in the regard to schools, the churches, and uh playground type areas for kids on there. So uh what do you have? And um we uh need to be at least looking about what is your desire as a council in in uh protecting locations from uh areas here, and this is a little bit different than a bar or two. You need to be aware of that because normally unless somebody is uh cracking open that a half pint of whiskey when they go out of the liquor store, they're gonna be taking that a little bit further away. But the question becomes is that uh something in your community that might result in more crimes or more concerns for your your public councilman Henderson. Um well, two questions. One Phil, what's the distance between in I believe in our um the pawn shop? Yes, what is I think it's 500? I was thinking 500. You say a thousand? Is it a thousand? Um alternative financial circus of two thousand I know that uh adult-oriented establishments is five hundred feet.
openpublica.com