OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Chattanooga, Tennessee/City Council & City Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Chattanooga Council Economic Development Committee: TIF Policy Reform and Nippon Paint Clawback - Oct 27, 2026

City Council & City Boards — Tuesday, October 27, 2026
BodyChattanooga, Tennessee
SessionCity Council & City Boards
DateTuesday, October 27, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:21:03

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

8:47

Okay.

8:47

I'm going to call to order

Speaker 2

8:49

the economic development committee for the Chattanooga City Council.

8:52

Today is October 27, 2026.

8:55

Can I get a motion on the minutes from our last economic development meeting, please?

Speaker 3

9:01

I can give you a motion, but if we don't have a quorum, can we

Speaker 2

9:04

have a quorum?

9:04

There's five of us on the committee, and there's three of us here.

9:07

Which makes a quorum of our committee.

9:14

That's right.

9:15

Never mind.

9:15

We do not actually have a quorum, so we won't vote on the minutes.

9:25

Councilman Harvey, Councilman Burrs, and Councilman Elliott.

9:30

Okay, so Sharina has put together a presentation for us about the current status of our TIFF policies and some recommendations about changes that we would she would like for us to consider and the administration would like us to consider.

9:47

So we'll turn the floor over to her.

Speaker 4

10:00

I provided at our previous meeting an overview of the status of those TIFS.

10:05

Those TIFFs were approved under two different versions of TIFP policies, so slight modifications, and we're actually looking to make some recommendations this fall to modify our existing policies as well.

10:19

And so I'll do a quick overview.

10:25

And so table of contents.

10:27

I'm going to start first high-level overview of the policy provision that allows us to make changes to TIP policies at any time.

10:35

I then want to walk through our existing policies, the different sections of them.

10:39

I will go over an overview, a flow chart of the process by which TIFFs get approved, and then a quick highlight of new software that our economic development department has implemented to help with monitoring TIFS and pilots, and then look at some of the sample recommendations that are currently under view by county auditor.

10:59

We have two consulting teams and then city council.

11:03

I've had some recommendations from actually members that would like to see some changes to some of the policies.

11:08

So quickly, if when we get to section four, I will cover some of the procedural items, but basically from time to time and without notice, these policies may be amended away in whole or part by the board and city, and new policies may also be adopted by the board and the city.

11:24

So under this provision, we're able to bring forward as often as we need it, recommended recommendations and changes to the policies.

11:32

Overview of the most recent TIP policies.

Speaker 1

11:42

Thank you.

11:42

Appreciate it.

Speaker 4

11:43

And so basically, if we're to walk through these, it'll give you an overview of the various sections of the policy so that when we get to the flow chart, you'll see where those happen.

11:54

And then as we look to modify existing policies, I will refer to the exactual sections in which those policies fall.

12:01

So basically, the very highlight, the very first one is the introduction, the overview.

12:06

It's the purpose of the TIFFs, why we do the TIFFs.

12:09

It's mainly for public infrastructure, is how we use it.

12:12

There are other municipalities around the state that have TIFF policies that are used in other ways, but we use ours mainly for infrastructure that's for public benefit.

12:21

Next is the general policy section.

12:24

That will give you an overview along with sort of how we use it, why we use it, and our restrictions within

Unassigned speaker

12:32

it.

Speaker 4

12:34

There you go.

12:34

If you want to flip through your hard copy while I'm going through that.

12:38

Section two is going to be your statutory background.

12:41

That's the Tennessee state statutes that provide the provisions under which the TIFFs are operated under the Industrial Development Board.

Unassigned speaker

12:50

And

Speaker 4

12:50

so what we will see is with our policies, our policies involve the Industrial Development Board because they have to be involved by state statute.

12:58

I got one.

13:00

Thank you.

13:01

The Industrial Development Board, and then the City Council and then the county commission should the county decide to participate.

13:09

So all of that will fall under your statutory background.

13:13

It also outlines what is actually required in a TIFF.

13:17

And so again, it's there's a preparation submission of an economic impact plan that has that's required by state statute.

13:26

There has to be a public hearing on that, also required.

13:29

And then the administer uh administering of the incremental tax payments that's allocated to the board, that falls under the economic impact plan as well.

13:38

So as you look to make recommendations or modifications, those are the three things that can't be changed.

13:44

Those those have to stay in place.

13:45

So that's why they fall under statutory background.

13:49

Section three, page five.

13:51

That's where we're starting to look at the process.

13:53

Again, it's the application, it's a board consideration, it's submission to governmental authorities, it's the economic impact plan, which it's drafted by outside council, application review committee, the public hearing,

Unassigned speaker

14:10

the

Speaker 4

14:10

approval of the plan, and the closing of the tax increment.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Tax Increment Financing█████████████████████████████████████████████60%
Pending Litigation██████████13%
Economic Development██████8%
Public Engagement█████7%
Procedural██3%
Workforce Development██3%
Technology and Innovation██2%
Affordable Housing██2%
Community Engagement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Chattanooga City Council Economic Development Committee: TIF Policy Review and Nippon Paint Clawback - October 27, 2026

The Chattanooga City Council’s Economic Development Committee convened at approximately 1:21 PM ET on October 27, 2026, to discuss significant reforms to the city’s Tax Increment Financing (TIF) policies and debate a proposed clawback settlement with Nippon Paint. Administration staff presented a detailed review of the current TIF application process, policy recommendations from external audits, and a new software platform for managing incentives. The committee expressed strong opposition to the proposed Nippon Paint settlement, directing staff to renegotiate a more aggressive deal before a full council vote.

Consent Calendar

  • The committee voted to approve the minutes from its previous meeting without objection.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public testified directly, but council members extensively represented community interests during their discussions. Chairman Davis advocated for preserving public input mechanisms during the TIF process, citing the Northgate TIF as an example where early community engagement built trust. Councilwomen Clark and Hill emphasized the need for community benefits to address the unfulfilled economic promises from the Nippon Paint project.

Discussion Items

TIF Policy Review and Reform Proposals

Administration staff (Sharita) provided a comprehensive overview of current TIF policies, detailing the standard 12-step, 6-to-12-month approval process involving the Industrial Development Board (IDB), City Council, and County Commission. A key proposal was the elimination of the Application Review Committee (Step 6), which staff stated adds roughly five weeks to the timeline and duplicates review work now managed by a new $44,000 Civic Service software platform funded by the IDB. Additional recommendations from a county auditor audit and a site selector analysis (comparing Chattanooga to Knoxville, Greenville, Louisville, and Tulsa) were reviewed, including potential changes to the $8,000 application fee and the 15% cap on infrastructure reimbursement for projects.

  • Councilman Elliott supported streamlining the process and requested staff identify which specific recommendations from the competitive study the administration does not support. He expressed interest in exploring Municipal Utility Districts.
  • Councilman Henderson opposed reducing or waiving the $8,000 application fee and supported incorporating workforce development and job training requirements into TIF agreements. He acknowledged the inherent tension between transparency and efficiency in government.
  • Councilwoman Clark requested exploration of using TIFs for vertical infrastructure improvements (such as grocery stores or housing) rather than strictly public infrastructure, noting the current policy limits TIFs to infrastructure and that other cities successfully use TIFs for vertical purposes.
  • Councilwoman Hill asked for clarity on which external recommendations the administration opposes and urged thoughtful consideration of public engagement mechanisms if the Application Review Committee is removed.

Nippon Paint Clawback Negotiation

Staff reviewed the Nippon Paint land donation deal from 2018, where the city donated 29 acres of land (valued at $1.157 million) in exchange for a commitment to create 150 jobs with an average salary of $47,070 and $60 million in capital investment by 2027. The city fulfilled its obligations, including the land donation, a $900,000 road extension, and sewer relocation, totaling approximately $4 million in investment. Nippon Paint built one 270,000-square-foot facility, invested $52 million, and employed 30–35 people in testing and chemistry roles, but failed to construct two additional buildings or create the promised jobs, citing the downturn in the electric vehicle market. The proposed clawback settlement requires Nippon to repay the $1.157 million land value and return 10 acres of the donated land.

  • Vice Chair Elliott strongly criticized the settlement, declaring it a “very weak” deal and stating he would not support it. He argued the city should reclaim all 29 acres and lease the land, emphasizing the significant collateral damage to the community from lost jobs and economic impact.
  • Councilwoman Clark echoed Elliott’s concerns, stating the clawback must reflect the full economic damage, not just the initial land value. She requested the city attorney present a stronger argument to the full council.
  • Councilwoman Hill suggested exploring community benefits or contributions from Nippon for the East Chattanooga community to compensate for the unfulfilled job promises.
  • Staff argued the settlement was a balanced compromise that recoups costs, returns developable land, keeps a still-operating facility on the tax rolls (32 current employees), and demonstrates the city’s ability to enforce agreements without being overly punitive.
  • Council consensus: The committee rejected the proposed terms and directed staff and legal counsel to renegotiate a significantly stronger clawback agreement before the full City Council vote scheduled for the following week.

Key Outcomes

  • TIF Policy Changes: The committee advanced the proposal to eliminate the Application Review Committee to shorten approval timelines. Staff will provide a list of specific policy recommendations they oppose. Future meetings will explore TIFs for vertical infrastructure and the establishment of Municipal Utility Districts.
  • Nippon Paint Settlement: The committee formally rejected the proposed clawback terms (repayment of $1.157 million and return of 10 acres). Staff and the city attorney were directed to pursue a stronger settlement for the full council vote the following week.
  • Minutes: Approved.

Meeting Transcript

Okay. I'm going to call to order the economic development committee for the Chattanooga City Council. Today is October 27, 2026. Can I get a motion on the minutes from our last economic development meeting, please? I can give you a motion, but if we don't have a quorum, can we have a quorum? There's five of us on the committee, and there's three of us here. Which makes a quorum of our committee. That's right. Never mind. We do not actually have a quorum, so we won't vote on the minutes. Councilman Harvey, Councilman Burrs, and Councilman Elliott. Okay, so Sharina has put together a presentation for us about the current status of our TIFF policies and some recommendations about changes that we would she would like for us to consider and the administration would like us to consider. So we'll turn the floor over to her. I provided at our previous meeting an overview of the status of those TIFS. Those TIFFs were approved under two different versions of TIFP policies, so slight modifications, and we're actually looking to make some recommendations this fall to modify our existing policies as well. And so I'll do a quick overview. And so table of contents. I'm going to start first high-level overview of the policy provision that allows us to make changes to TIP policies at any time. I then want to walk through our existing policies, the different sections of them. I will go over an overview, a flow chart of the process by which TIFFs get approved, and then a quick highlight of new software that our economic development department has implemented to help with monitoring TIFS and pilots, and then look at some of the sample recommendations that are currently under view by county auditor. We have two consulting teams and then city council. I've had some recommendations from actually members that would like to see some changes to some of the policies. So quickly, if when we get to section four, I will cover some of the procedural items, but basically from time to time and without notice, these policies may be amended away in whole or part by the board and city, and new policies may also be adopted by the board and the city. So under this provision, we're able to bring forward as often as we need it, recommended recommendations and changes to the policies. Overview of the most recent TIP policies. Thank you. Appreciate it. And so basically, if we're to walk through these, it'll give you an overview of the various sections of the policy so that when we get to the flow chart, you'll see where those happen. And then as we look to modify existing policies, I will refer to the exactual sections in which those policies fall. So basically, the very highlight, the very first one is the introduction, the overview. It's the purpose of the TIFFs, why we do the TIFFs. It's mainly for public infrastructure, is how we use it. There are other municipalities around the state that have TIFF policies that are used in other ways, but we use ours mainly for infrastructure that's for public benefit. Next is the general policy section. That will give you an overview along with sort of how we use it, why we use it, and our restrictions within it. There you go. If you want to flip through your hard copy while I'm going through that. Section two is going to be your statutory background. That's the Tennessee state statutes that provide the provisions under which the TIFFs are operated under the Industrial Development Board. And so what we will see is with our policies, our policies involve the Industrial Development Board because they have to be involved by state statute. I got one. Thank you. The Industrial Development Board, and then the City Council and then the county commission should the county decide to participate. So all of that will fall under your statutory background. It also outlines what is actually required in a TIFF. And so again, it's there's a preparation submission of an economic impact plan that has that's required by state statute.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com