Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The committee met on November 3, 2026, at 18:56 UTC to discuss an update on a proposed long-term vacant commercial properties ordinance, hear council members' questions, approve minutes, and review scheduling and property matters.
Sure, we can just have some conversation. So Councilman Clark had actually requested uh an update on the long-term vacant commercial properties ordinance that's in the works, and so that's what I provided. So we can go over that real quickly, and then I'm happy to answer any questions that you all have. So just as a reminder, um the overall goal is to well, the purpose was to pr protect public safety, neighborhood quality, and future develop redevelopment opportunities by addressing long-term vacant commercial properties in designated heavily impacted corridors. Um what I've been doing over the last couple months. Was the case example was 5200 uh Brainerd Road, which is the old Wendy's. And one of the answers, thanks to, I don't know if anybody from economic development is here, but um, you know, the the storefront incentives, which I think will help with with regard to that. So that's that those are the preliminary findings. Um again to the second page, just uh the pros and cons of a vacancy tax or fee, encourages owners to lease sell, renovate the developed properties, discourages uh them holding and prolonging the vacancy, creates greater accountability, could generate rent revenue to support enforcement and neighborhood improvements. And I'm working on a cost analysis of what vacant properties actually are costing the city across the board with enforced code enforcement, uh fire and police attention, uh, our office of homelessness. I tried to do it on the Wendy's property, and I was like, oh, it's it's gonna show like millions of dollars. Um not really, but it was small in comparison to I think a lot of the attention that it's gotten. It's gotten a lot of citations, and there's been a little bit, but nothing notable when I asked police. So I'm asked, I'm going back and saying, okay, can we get kind of a citywide scope of what it's cost us? Um, and then of course, potential concerns, it may penalize owners who have legitimate reasons for why the paper the property is vacant. It does not guarantee a property will be redeveloped or occupied, could create additional administrative and enforcement costs. That that could be a con. My thought is if we were to go in the direction of a vacancy tax, that fee would go into cover, it would have to go into covering those costs. Um then requires evaluation of what our legal authority is under Tennessee law. So I am looking into that as well. So that's these are the resources. Um these are some other cities that have similar vacancy tax or fees, and those are links. So if you want to look into it more, you can actually link to these if you look at it on our website. I mean, on the Google document. And then thanks to Councilwoman Hill, these are some articles that pretty much are good basis for all of this stuff at well as well. So we did the research, but these articles say a lot of the same things, so it's these aren't new issues. I'd be happy to address any questions if anybody has anything. Yeah. Um, I guess this may be a Phil question. Phil, how are you? I'm doing well. How's it going? I'm good. I I guess yeah, come on up, have a seat. Okay. Um regarding the vacancy tax or fee. I'm gonna imagine it's probably more within our authority to do some sort of fee instead of levy a certain tax or something like that. Would that be correct? You're talking about properties that people are just not maintaining. Yeah, I think it would be better to try to assess the fee. To do a fee, yeah. Okay. Okay. Um, yeah, I'm curious uh as to what Jackson in Memphis do. Do you have an idea?