OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Chattanooga, Tennessee/City Council & City Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Chattanooga Council Committee Meeting: Vacant Commercial Properties Update, November 3, 2026

City Council & City Boards — Tuesday, November 3, 2026
BodyChattanooga, Tennessee
SessionCity Council & City Boards
DateTuesday, November 3, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 29:17

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

6:58

Sure, we can just have some conversation.

7:01

So Councilman Clark had actually requested uh an update on the long-term vacant commercial properties ordinance that's in the works, and so that's what I provided.

7:14

So we can go over that real quickly, and then I'm happy to answer any questions that you all have.

7:18

So just as a reminder, um the overall goal is to well, the purpose was to pr protect public safety, neighborhood quality, and future develop redevelopment opportunities by addressing long-term vacant commercial properties in designated heavily impacted corridors.

7:35

Um what I've been doing over the last couple months.

7:55

Was the case example was 5200 uh Brainerd Road, which is the old Wendy's.

10:04

And one of the answers, thanks to, I don't know if anybody from economic development is here, but um, you know, the the storefront incentives, which I think will help with with regard to that.

10:15

So that's that those are the preliminary findings.

10:19

Um again to the second page, just uh the pros and cons of a vacancy tax or fee, encourages owners to lease sell, renovate the developed properties, discourages uh them holding and prolonging the vacancy, creates greater accountability, could generate rent revenue to support enforcement and neighborhood improvements.

10:40

And I'm working on a cost analysis of what vacant properties actually are costing the city across the board with enforced code enforcement, uh fire and police attention,

Unassigned speaker

10:52

uh,

Speaker 1

10:53

our office of homelessness.

10:54

I tried to do it on the Wendy's property, and I was like, oh, it's it's gonna show like millions of dollars.

10:59

Um not really, but it was small in comparison to I think a lot of the attention that it's gotten.

11:05

It's gotten a lot of citations, and there's been a little bit, but nothing notable when I asked police.

11:12

So I'm asked, I'm going back and saying, okay, can we get kind of a citywide scope of what it's cost

Speaker 2

11:18

us?

Speaker 1

11:19

Um, and then of course, potential concerns, it may penalize owners who have legitimate reasons for why the paper the property is vacant.

11:29

It does not guarantee a property will be redeveloped or occupied, could create additional administrative and enforcement costs.

11:35

That that could be a con.

11:38

My thought is if we were to go in the direction of a vacancy tax, that fee would go into cover, it would have to go into covering those costs.

11:46

Um then requires evaluation of what our legal authority is under Tennessee law.

11:52

So I am looking into that as well.

11:54

So that's these are the resources.

11:57

Um these are some other cities that have similar vacancy tax or fees, and those are links.

12:03

So if you want to look into it more, you can actually link to these if you look at it on our website.

12:07

I mean, on the Google document.

12:09

And then thanks to Councilwoman Hill, these are some articles that pretty much are good basis for all of this stuff at well as well.

12:18

So we did the research, but these articles say a lot of the same things, so it's these aren't new issues.

12:24

I'd be happy

Unassigned speaker

12:26

to

Speaker 1

12:26

address any questions if anybody has anything.

Speaker 3

12:29

Yeah.

12:32

Um, I guess this may be a Phil question.

12:35

Phil, how are you?

Speaker 4

12:36

I'm doing well.

12:37

How's it going?

Speaker 3

12:37

I'm good.

12:38

I I guess yeah, come on up, have a seat.

Unassigned speaker

12:41

Okay.

Speaker 3

12:43

Um regarding the vacancy tax or fee.

12:47

I'm gonna imagine it's probably more within our authority to do some sort of fee instead of levy a certain tax or something like that.

12:54

Would that be correct?

Speaker 4

12:56

You're talking about properties that people are just not maintaining.

12:59

Yeah, I think it would be better to try to assess the fee.

Speaker 3

13:02

To do a fee, yeah.

13:03

Okay.

13:03

Okay.

13:04

Um, yeah, I'm curious uh as to what Jackson in Memphis do.

13:09

Do you have an idea?

Speaker 1

13:10

Yeah, so Jackson does have uh a vacancy fee, and it's a um what I'll give you a high level view of what it is.

13:20

Uh if it's a vacant property, they're required to register with the city as a vacant property.

13:25

And once they register with the city, then they establish are they vacant because they're renovating, they're actively looking for a lease, or they're actively looking to sell it.

Speaker 3

13:37

And

Speaker 1

13:37

then they have a period of time that it can remain in that state.

13:41

And if let's say six six months, I don't remember the the time frame offhand, if after six months they haven't nothing has changed on that property, then that fee could be reassessed, and it continues to increase until they do something with the property.

13:55

So it encourages movement on the property.

Speaker 3

13:59

Okay.

14:00

I wonder if I'm just thinking out loud of you know, if if they can't do anything with it, would an option be to

Unassigned speaker

14:08

you

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planning And Zoning█████████████████████████████████████████████55%
Procedural███████████████18%
Public Works█████████11%
Affordable Housing███████9%
Economic Development██████7%
Summary of Proceedings

Chattanooga City Council Committee Meeting – November 3, 2026

The committee met on November 3, 2026, at 18:56 UTC to discuss an update on a proposed long-term vacant commercial properties ordinance, hear council members' questions, approve minutes, and review scheduling and property matters.

Discussion Items

  • Staff provided the requested update on the ordinance, which is intended to protect public safety, neighborhood quality, and future redevelopment opportunities by addressing long-term vacant commercial properties in designated heavily impacted corridors. The case example was 5200 Brainerd Road, the former Wendy's, and staff said storefront incentives may help address that property.
  • Staff summarized potential pros and cons of a vacancy tax or fee. Pros identified: encouraging owners to lease, sell, or renovate; discouraging prolonged vacancy; creating greater accountability; and generating revenue to support enforcement and neighborhood improvements. Potential cons: penalizing owners with legitimate reasons for vacancy, no guarantee a property will be redeveloped or occupied, possible administrative/enforcement costs, and a need to evaluate legal authority under Tennessee law.
  • Staff is preparing a citywide cost analysis of vacant properties, including code enforcement, fire/police attention, and homelessness services, and has compiled resources from other cities and articles provided by Councilwoman Hill.
  • City Attorney Phil answered council questions, saying a fee is likely more feasible than a tax and would need to be reasonably related to the costs of maintaining the program and benefiting the area. He cited Jackson, Tennessee's model: owners register vacant properties, indicate whether they are renovating, seeking a lease, or seeking a sale, and face a reassessed/increasing fee if no change occurs within a set period.
  • One council member suggested allowing property owners to sell long-vacant buildings to the city for workforce or affordable housing, including downtown multifamily reuse. Staff said the fee approach is meant to be supportive, not punitive, and could connect owners with economic development resources and incentives.
  • Another council member said a fee is a lesser alternative to condemnation, while staff noted the fee would not remove maintenance obligations and could support getting properties into better shape. Staff cited three empty restaurants on Brainerd Road and noted the Wendy's building sat idle for about five years and is now slated for demolition.
  • A council member asked about a citywide vacant-property database; staff said the information can be accessed through Nicole Heyman and added to the committee folder.
  • Council members discussed using fee revenue for a program similar to River City's scenic storefronts, possibly targeted to specific districts or corridors rather than citywide. Rossville Boulevard was mentioned as an area being reinvested where the policy might need careful application, and the IDB or HUB might help with grants.
  • One council member asked about lots used as de facto junkyards with rotting cars and suggested folding that issue into the ordinance; another asked whether any administration program currently addresses vacant properties. Staff indicated support and referenced Nicole Heyman's work on a state strategy.
  • A council member proposed a pilot program along the Brainerd/Midtown corridor for 18 months with reassessment; staff expressed interest in a boundary-based pilot.
  • A council member noted that some vacancies stem from financing pro formas from low-interest-rate real estate deals and low carrying costs, and urged a robust program with meaningful grants and escalating fees. The member noted Jackson's fee starts around $400 for the first year and that New Mexico and California start higher.

Key Outcomes

  • No ordinance was adopted. Staff will continue legal review, cost analysis, data compilation, and ordinance development, with a future update expected at the next Land Use, Zoning and Housing Committee meeting.
  • Committee minutes were approved on a motion and stood as published.
  • The chair announced a lunch-and-learn at the wastewater treatment center the following week, with updates on a Class A power project. The November 17 strategic planning meeting will likely be canceled if no agenda items are submitted; December strategic planning will include a discussion on homeless housing and possibly council building safety improvements.
  • In response to a question about the old Sports Authority property, the city attorney said it was not yet fully wound down: the temporary use agreement with River City was extended, the structure is mostly demolished, a transfer could occur if River City pays the $200 purchase/repurchase price, and the annual temporary use agreement date would be provided. A council member noted that appointments are still needed for two open positions on the board associated with the matter, while the attorney advised leaving the current arrangement in place.
  • The committee was reminded of the attorney-client session after recess and adjourned to the 3:30 meeting.

Meeting Transcript

Sure, we can just have some conversation. So Councilman Clark had actually requested uh an update on the long-term vacant commercial properties ordinance that's in the works, and so that's what I provided. So we can go over that real quickly, and then I'm happy to answer any questions that you all have. So just as a reminder, um the overall goal is to well, the purpose was to pr protect public safety, neighborhood quality, and future develop redevelopment opportunities by addressing long-term vacant commercial properties in designated heavily impacted corridors. Um what I've been doing over the last couple months. Was the case example was 5200 uh Brainerd Road, which is the old Wendy's. And one of the answers, thanks to, I don't know if anybody from economic development is here, but um, you know, the the storefront incentives, which I think will help with with regard to that. So that's that those are the preliminary findings. Um again to the second page, just uh the pros and cons of a vacancy tax or fee, encourages owners to lease sell, renovate the developed properties, discourages uh them holding and prolonging the vacancy, creates greater accountability, could generate rent revenue to support enforcement and neighborhood improvements. And I'm working on a cost analysis of what vacant properties actually are costing the city across the board with enforced code enforcement, uh fire and police attention, uh, our office of homelessness. I tried to do it on the Wendy's property, and I was like, oh, it's it's gonna show like millions of dollars. Um not really, but it was small in comparison to I think a lot of the attention that it's gotten. It's gotten a lot of citations, and there's been a little bit, but nothing notable when I asked police. So I'm asked, I'm going back and saying, okay, can we get kind of a citywide scope of what it's cost us? Um, and then of course, potential concerns, it may penalize owners who have legitimate reasons for why the paper the property is vacant. It does not guarantee a property will be redeveloped or occupied, could create additional administrative and enforcement costs. That that could be a con. My thought is if we were to go in the direction of a vacancy tax, that fee would go into cover, it would have to go into covering those costs. Um then requires evaluation of what our legal authority is under Tennessee law. So I am looking into that as well. So that's these are the resources. Um these are some other cities that have similar vacancy tax or fees, and those are links. So if you want to look into it more, you can actually link to these if you look at it on our website. I mean, on the Google document. And then thanks to Councilwoman Hill, these are some articles that pretty much are good basis for all of this stuff at well as well. So we did the research, but these articles say a lot of the same things, so it's these aren't new issues. I'd be happy to address any questions if anybody has anything. Yeah. Um, I guess this may be a Phil question. Phil, how are you? I'm doing well. How's it going? I'm good. I I guess yeah, come on up, have a seat. Okay. Um regarding the vacancy tax or fee. I'm gonna imagine it's probably more within our authority to do some sort of fee instead of levy a certain tax or something like that. Would that be correct? You're talking about properties that people are just not maintaining. Yeah, I think it would be better to try to assess the fee. To do a fee, yeah. Okay. Okay. Um, yeah, I'm curious uh as to what Jackson in Memphis do. Do you have an idea?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com