The Chesapeake City Council held a work session at 4:00 p.m. followed by a regular meeting at 6:30 p.m. on March 26, 2024. The work session focused on proposed changes to City Council Rules and Procedures and the FY 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Operating Budget. The regular meeting included a public hearing on the Industrial Waterfront Study, approval of consent and regular agenda items, citizen comments on a ward-based voting system, appointments to boards and commissions, and three new business resolutions. All votes were 9-0 except for a substitute motion on a lobbying disclosure resolution, which passed 6-3.
Up to any council member who has any comments, questions, or opinions on any of the rules of order and procedures that are up for discussion. Anyone? I have one. Um number one. It's a little bit ambiguous, the wording in that if a council member should ask a question that takes 20 seconds to ask, and it takes seven minutes to answer, that might pose an issue if the the person has more than one question. So I don't know how to address that, whether it's excluding answers. We have usually have such a limited amount of time, but sometimes members of council has several questions and the answers aren't always short. So this is work session. Uh Dr. Ditchka. Thank you, Ms. Ritter. Uh I think that is important. By tradition, if a council member prefaces a uh if the recognized is recognized by the mayor, then prefaces uh prefaces their uh the comment with I have a question for clarification, if that's accepted by council without objection, then that should the answer to that, no matter what time should not be counted against the uh uh the council member. Does that need in any way to be memorialized, or you think this is supposed to be? I think sorry, I think it's sufficient. Okay, I'll leave it up to council. I just wanted to clarify that because sometimes the staff's answers need to be long and detailed. Um normally since you know a work session is not to stake a claim in a position, but it's to essentially be a fact-finding mission. Um I wouldn't want to limit it to not being able to flesh out important points. Thank you. So any other discussion about this item before we move to the next one? No, I'm gonna assume since we have um no other objections to this particular change, and we are agreeing as a council to move forward in making the change. Is that correct? Anybody nodding? So quick question. Um do we need to have a formal vote of acceptance of our rules of procedure once the council meeting starts? I'll leave that to the vice mayor. Traditionally we have, and I think that's appropriate. Yeah, okay, cool. Yep. So in a work session? Yeah, in a on an agenda item. So we would bring these changes back as a as a work item. We can we can get very good idea. Excellent. Right, yeah. Okay. Sounds good. Uh Mr. Ike, you had another? Number two. Okay. Um provide a specific chain of custody transfer and retention of all documents distributed to council members during closed session. Uh adding to the closed session item 2C would be when a closed session has been certified by a vote of council to have discussed matters legally exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, revealing any discussion during said session shall result in an automatic censure of the council member responsible for such disclosure. This censure shall be made publicly under the new business in the agenda. Um I kind of object to the word automatic, because in this country we have something called due process, and who's making the decision that somebody violated closed session, and I think that's a that's a pretty murky addition to it, and I object. Any other comments? Ritter? Well, I think we'll just vote on it.