Chesapeake City Council Meeting - June 16, 2026
Chesapeake City Council Meeting - June 16, 2026
The Chesapeake City Council convened on June 16, 2026, at 6:30 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chamber. The meeting began with a work session at 4:45 P.M. on the FY27 Budget Amendments and Street Treatments in the South Norfolk Historic District, followed by the regular council meeting. The council considered several public hearing items, including rezonings, conditional use permits, and a text amendment, and took action on multiple items.
Work Session
- FY27 Budget Amendments: The city's budget director presented final amendments and technical corrections to the recently adopted budget, driven by timing and new information such as grant awards and reappropriations. The state budget is pending, with potential impacts on city departments and schools.
- Street Treatments (Concrete vs. Asphalt) in South Norfolk Historic District: The public works director presented a proposal to change the 'like-for-like' policy for road surfaces, allowing concrete roads to be repaired or replaced with asphalt. The cost per block is $1.2 million for concrete vs. $300,000 for asphalt. Staff recommended the change, and council supported it without formal action.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of Proposed Agenda: Approved as presented (9-0).
- Recognition of Oscar Smith High School Chamber Orchestra: The orchestra performed at Carnegie Hall; recognized by council.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Viridian Reserve North (PLN-REZ-2025-009): Multiple residents spoke in opposition, citing concerns about school overcrowding (Southeastern Elementary at 120% capacity), flooding risks, traffic, and loss of forested land. The applicant argued the project provides needed roadway connections and water line redundancy. Council approved with proffers (7-2).
- Great Hope Baptist Church (PLN-REZ-2025-015): The church seeks to rezone to AC for parking expansion. Speakers supported the rezoning but opposed a 10-foot trail requirement. Council continued the item to August 18 (6-3) for further discussion.
- Bedford Contractor Storage Yard (PLN-USE-2025-034): Residents opposed, citing narrow roads (18-20 ft wide) and safety concerns for children. Council approved with stipulations (8-1).
- Greenbrier Costco (PLN-USE-2025-048): Speakers supported the development, citing economic benefits, though infrastructure concerns were raised. Council approved (9-0).
- Liberty Defense Armory (PLN-USE-2026-003): No public speakers; council approved with stipulations (8-1).
- External Building Lighting (PLN-TXT-2025-004): Two speakers requested additional restrictions on brightness and timing for wildlife. Council approved the version with amendment to turn off lights from 10 p.m. to dawn (7-2).
Discussion Items
- Edinburgh PUD Accelerated Proffer Modification (PLN-PUDM-APM-2026-001): Allowed swimming pools in secondary front yards on corner lots. Approved with development criteria (9-0).
- Appointee Compensation: Council approved a 3.5% COLA and car allowance for appointees except the manager (9-0).
Key Outcomes
- Viridian Reserve North: Approved with proffers including a 43-unit cap, school occupancy trigger, 10-foot buffer, and Edinburgh Parkway extension (7-2; King and Ritter voted no).
- Great Hope Baptist Church: Continued to August 18, 2026, for further negotiation on trail requirements (6-3).
- Bedford Contractor Storage Yard: Approved with stipulations including a 6-foot fence, no retail sales, and traffic direction (8-1; Ritter voted no).
- Greenbrier Costco: Approved for fuel station and tire center with conditions (9-0).
- Liberty Defense Armory: Approved for home-based firearm sales with customer limits (8-1; Ward voted no).
- External Building Lighting: Approved with amendment requiring lights off from 10 p.m. to dawn (7-2; King and Ward voted no).
- Edinburgh PUD Modification: Approved for corner lot pools (9-0).
- Closed Meeting: Scheduled for June 23, 2026 at 5 p.m. (9-0).
- Adjournment: 10:02 p.m.
Meeting Transcript
Test one two testing. Oh, I don't know. And we'll be on the Welcome everyone to our uh work session, June 16, 2026, Mr. Manager. Two items this evening, one on the budget and one on materials used uh for public works projects in South Dolphic, and I'll turn it right over to Jonathan Hobbs, our budget director. All right, thank you, Chris. Uh good evening, Mayor West, Vice Mayor Ritter, members of City Council. I'm here this afternoon to present the final amendments and technical corrections for the budget that was adopted by city council on May the twelfth. So, gonna go quickly through the agenda. We're gonna talk first about why do we even need uh to perform and request these uh post-adoption amendments. We call these final amendments, but this year there is a major caveat to the word final, so talk a little bit about that. Then we're gonna go through the final amendments for the operating budget and the capital improvement program, then we'll switch over to technical corrections for the operating budget and capital improvement program, and then we'll talk a little bit about the timeline, next steps, and uh any closing thoughts. So, why do we need to come to council and request and recommend final amendments and technical corrections to a budget that was recently adopted? This is really mostly driven by timing and also the pace of the process. So I want to get a little more in depth on the timing piece. So, this graphic here shows you basically the last five months of any given fiscal year. So there comes a point in the budget process when we're developing the city manager's proposed budget that we really have to have a hard stop in terms of making changes. Why do we have to have that hard stop? Well, the money has to stop moving, we have to be able to balance funds, uh, we have to be able to draft and prepare the documents so that we can ultimately bring them to city council. Uh, but life continues. Uh things continue to happen in the city. Uh, we continue to receive grant awards. Uh, the city manager continues to exercise his authority granted by city council in the budget ordinance. So, those are the types of things that we have to catch up. The other thing that we make every effort to do is from the time that the city manager proposes the budget until the time that city council adopts on May twelfth, we really believe that those changes should be council driven. And instead, this is where we're coming back, and these are staff requested and recommended changes as opposed to those council requested changes to the budget that you see uh when we come on May the twelfth and and amend the city manager's proposed budget, and it's ultimately adopted by city council. So, talk a little bit about what the difference is. We categorize them in two groups. So you may be asking what's the difference between a final amendment and a technical correction. For both of these, or excuse me, for this one in particular, these are items that would have been included in the city manager's proposed budget, but for the timing of the item. So for example, and you'll see several of these, we received new information on grant awards. So, had we known that at the time the manager's budget was proposed, we would have included that information in the manager's budget. Uh, we need to add additional appropriations to the project prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. So that's a type of item that would be in final amendments. Also revised estimates, legislative changes that occur, and then any requests that we do receive from city council subsequent to the adoption are included in final amendments. These amendments may increase the total budget and may also increase the position complement included in the budget. And if we did not bring these as part of this package, these items would need to be requested on a future city council agenda. So on the technical correction side, I mentioned this a moment ago. A lot of this is carrying forward some of those administrative approvals that were made after the budget was proposed. So the manager is granted authority by council to do things like reclassify positions, move positions from one program to another, to take a full-time position and break it down into part-time positions, or go the other direction and put together part-time positions and make those full-time positions. So those are the types of things that we are talking about when we're talking about those administrative changes. We also identify when we begin to load the budget into the financial system after the May 12th adoption. We also recognize that sometimes things aren't exactly how we had intended. So there may be an account that is incorrect, a program that is incorrect. So this is an opportunity for us to come back and make those corrections prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. Typically, these changes don't uh increase the total budget or the position complement. It's really swapping similar amounts or the same amount between, like I said, those programs or those accounts. But again, these items would need to be placed on a future council agenda if they were not brought as part of this package. I mentioned the caveat to the final, and this is kind of a big one. We don't have a state budget adopted yet, unless something happened in the last hour.
openpublica.com