Thank you, Mr.

Chairman.

Chairman Frazier.

Vice Chair Mohica.

Commissioner Stone.

Here.

Commissioner Kirk?

Here.

Commissioner Kalarski?

Here.

Commissioner Brady?

Here.

Commissioner Whiteman.

Thank you, Mr.

Chairman.

Uh before we uh move into the briefing notes for tonight's uh meeting, there are the items for holds requests or deletions for the following items.

Item 30, PA 26, 7004, item 31, ZC 26056, item 32, VS 260057, item 33, WS 260058, and item 34, TM 26, 5011, all of which are companion items, which the applicant's representative is requesting to hold until the April 21st, 2026 Planning Commission meeting.

Please be advised the corresponding Board of County Commissioners meeting date will change from April 22nd, 2026 to May 20th, 2026.

These are all the items that are requested for holds or deletions from tonight's planning commission agenda.

Moving down to the next section of the agenda is a routine action items four through seven, with the first one being item four ET 26404, UC 230862, which is a first extension of time for a rock crushing facility within the Whitney planning area.

The Whitney Town Advisory Board recommended denial with the town advisory board members expressing concerns about the possible outdated traffic study since the project was approved several years ago.

Two neighbors were present opposing the project with parking traffic concerns.

Uh please be advised that this is a first extension of time, which staff ordinarily recommends approval on.

Item five, TM265020 is uh tentative map consisting of one commercial lot on 2.12 acres in an H2 zoning district with the enterprise town advisory board recommending approval.

Item six UC 26007 is a use permit to allow vehicle maintenance and repair with design review for modifications to an existing commercial building on a 1.16 acre portion of a 17.99 acre site within an existing shopping center and IP zoning district within Sunrise Manor, Sunrise Manor, Town Advisory Board recommends approval, staff recommends approval and has received two cards in support.

Item 7 VS 260031 is a request to vacate in a portion of right away being Paradise Road between Flamingo Road and Harmon Avenue within Paradise.

Paradise Town Advisory Board and Staff recommend approval.

Staff received one card in protest.

This concludes the routine action items on tonight's planning commission agenda.

I'm happy to entertain any questions the members of the commission may have.

And one of the things they said on the uh recommendation sheet was because it was approved so long ago.

Has there been any significant changes in the area as far as land use goes?

Uh no, Commissioner Kalarski.

There have not been any significant changes in the area that would warrant staff making a recommendation of denial on the first extension of time request.

Okay.

I was just curious only because it didn't make any sense.

Thank you.

You're welcome.

Thank you, Commissioner Clarke.

Any other questions on the routine action items?

Okay, all right.

So we we can go on to non-routine.

Thank you.

Thank you, Mr.

Chairman.

Moving on to the non-routine action items on tonight's agenda consisting of items eight through 34 with items 30 through 34, a request for a hold from the applicant's representative.

Item 8 UC 26049, a use permit to allow outdoor storage with waivers of development standards for the following modified residential adjacency standards, reduced buffering and screening, and eliminate street landscaping and fence located east of Fremont Street, north of Oakie Boulevard within Sunrise Manor.

The corresponding design review is for outdoor storage as well.

Sunrise Manor Town Advisory Board recommended denial.

The members of the town advisory board stated the proposed development was incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood and expressed concern over the reduced buffering and screening, in addition to eliminating street landscaping.

One neighbor expressed concern over the location of the trash enclosure on the site, in addition to vagrancy within the immediate area.

Planning staff is concerned with the outdoor storage use in proximity to the residential use and any potential impact it may have on the adjacent manufactured home park.

Staff is also concerned with a request to eliminate street landscaping along the right of way, as several of the commercial and industrial properties within that area have installed street landscaping.

Item nine and item 10 are companion items on this agenda and can be heard together, consisting of ES 260066, which is a request to vacate and abandon easements of interest to Clark County and a portion of right of way being Durango Drive, along with the corresponding use permit, UC 260065 to establish a vehicle wash facility with waiver development standards for modified residential adjacency standards and the corresponding design review.

Project is generally located south of Blue Diamond Road, west of Durango within Enterprise.

Enterprise Town Advisor Board recommended denial.

Staff received three cards and one letter in support and 21 cards and two letters in protest.

Two neighbors spoke in opposition to these items, with both neighbors stating that they were already several vehicle washes in the immediate area and that this business would not be a benefit to the surrounding community.

The Enterprise Town Advisory Board members were concerned about the potential noise from the vacuum stations as well as the vehicle wash itself.

They also noted that while the site to the west is undeveloped, it is currently zoned and master plan for multifamily residential development, and that the vehicle wash may impact future residents.

Planning staff is concerned with the potential impact the proposed vehicle wash facility may have on the existing single family residential development to the south.

The vacation and abandonment of the patent easements and this and the right of way is necessary to facilitate the development of the site and to accommodate the required detached sidewalk.

Item 11, WS 260.

I beg your pardon.

I did not skip an item on the agenda.

I apologize for that.

Item 11, WS 260029.

Holdover waiver development standards to eliminate and reduce buffering and separation for accessory structures in conjunction with an existing single-family residence in an RS5.2 zoning district, generally located east of Toponga Street and south of Hermosa Street within Winchester.

Winchester Town Advisory Board recommended approval.

Staff received four cards in support and three cards in protest.

Code enforcement violation 241967 is an act of code enforcement violation related to building without a permit and outdoor storage.

The applicant has applied for a permit request.

However, the permit is not been issued for an attached patio cover and enclosed storage room.

Item 12, WS 260030, a holdover waiver development standards to reduce rear setback for an existing detached accessory living quarters in conjunction with an existing single-family residence in an RS5.2 zone, generally located north of Hacienda Avenue and West of San El Samo Street within Paradise.

Paradise Town Advisory Board recommended approval of staff receiving one card and three letters in support.

There's an active code enforcement violation for building without a permit at this location.

The property owner has submitted a permit request.

Permit has not been issued for an addition to an existing storage building constructed without permits to create an accessory dwelling unit.

Item 13, WS 260034, waiver development standards to reduce the front setback and to eliminate building separation for an existing carport in conjunction with an existing single family residence in an RS5.2 zone located within Winchester.

There's an ex staff has received eight cards in support, five cards in protest with the Winchester Town Advisory Board recommending approval.

Permit has not been issued to construct a detached patio cover.

Item 14 WS 2640 is waiver development standards for the following to reduce setbacks and reduce building separation for existing sheds in conjunction with an existing single family residence and an RS5.2 zone located within Spring Valley.

Staff received six cards in support and eight cards and one letter in protest.

There's an active code enforcement violation for building without permits on the subject property.

The neighbor immediately south of the site attended the town advisory board meeting and is opposed to the waiver development standards request.

The neighbor stated that the shed is too large and too tall.

One town advisory board stated that this is a self-imposed hardship and that there is sufficient space on the subject property to relocate the shed and meet the requirements of the development code.

No permit request has been submitted to the building department.

Item 15, WS 260064.

Waiver development standards for the following.

Eliminate setbacks and reduce building separation for accessory structures in conjunction with an existing single family residence, an RS-20 zone within Enterprise.

The Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommends approval.

Staff has received two cards and one letter in support and two cards and one letter in protest.

Item 16, 17, 18, and 19 are companion items on tonight's agenda and can be heard together, with the first item being PA 26701, a planned amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from mid-intensity suburban neighborhood to corridor mixed use on 0.85 acres within enterprise.

The Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommended denial.

Staff received one card in support, two cards in protest.

Staff received one card in support and two cards in protest with the Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommending denial.

Item 18 VS 260037 is a corresponding vacation and abandonment of easements of interest to Clark County and a portion of right of way being Decatur Boulevard.

Item 19 is the use permit 260039, consisting of outdoor dining, drinking, and cooking with waivers and development standards to reduce setbacks, reduce street landscaping, reduce buffering and screening, modify residential adjacency standards, and alternative driveway geometrics with the design review for a proposed commercial building.

Town advisory board also took issue with the waivers for street and buffer landscaping and side to with staff in the opinion that a smaller building could have prevented the waiver development standards associated with the use permit request.

Planning staff is concerned with the proposed design of the landscaping along Ford Avenue in conjunction with the reduced street setbacks for the trash enclosure.

Furthermore, public work staff is concerned with the reduced approach and departure distances in addition to the driveway throat depths, and that will potentially create conflicts and safety concerns for vehicles.

Item 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25 are companion items on tonight's agenda and can be heard together, with the first item being PA 26702 applying amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from neighborhood commercial to compact neighborhood on 3.92 acres.

The Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommended approval.

Staff received four cards in support and 13 cards and one letter in protest.

The corresponding zone change 26003 to reclassify 3.92 acres from an RS20 zone to an RM18 zone.

The Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommended approval with staff receiving one card in support and 20 cards and one letter in protest.

The corresponding vacation and abandonment vs 2600 four to vacate easements of interest to Clark County.

A portion of right of way being Cactus Avenue, located between Radcliffe Street and Maryland Parkway, and uh secondary portion of right of way being Maryland Parkway.

The Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommended approval with staff receiving three cards in support and 23 cards and one letter in protest.

The corresponding waiver development standards are to modify driveway geometrics and increase the number of dwelling units on a private stub street in conjunction with the proposed single family residential development, with item 24 being the proposed plan unit development 26006, consisting of a 46 lot single family attached residential development with modified development standards on a 3.92 acre site.

The town advisory board recognizes the plan unit development allows for greater flexibility in the design of the site.

However, the town advisory boards had concern about how dense the site would be, and that there was only one access point for the entire development.

The town advisory board members also expressed concern, the sentiment that the plan unit development was being used as a way to make the site too complex and that it would not be beneficial to the residents of the community.

Public works staff is concerned the requested waivers to modify driveway geometrics in addition to allowing 10 dwelling units on a private substreet where a maximum of six dwelling units are allowed per Title 30 would potentially create conflicts and safety concerns with vehicles.

Item 25 is a corresponding tentative map, TM 265010 for the 46 single family residential lots and common lots.

The next items on your agenda, items 26, 27, 28, and 29 are companion items on tonight's agenda and can be heard together, with the first item being PA 26703, a plan amendment to redesignate the land use category from business employment to neighborhood commercial on 9.55 acres within Spring Valley.

The associated zone change, ZC26052 to reclassify 9.55 acres from a commercial core zone to a commercial general zone.

With the plan amendment, Spring Valley Town Advisory Board recommended approval with staff receiving one card in support with the corresponding zone change.

Spring Valley Town Advisory Board also recommended approval with staff receiving one card in support.

The corresponding vacation and abandonment vs 260053 to vacate easements of interest, in addition to a portion of right of way being Tiogo Way.

Vacation and abandonment is necessary to facilitate the development of the site and accommodate the required detached sidewalk.

WS 260054 are the corresponding waivers and development standards to eliminate street landscaping.

Increase retaining wall height, allow attached sidewalk and alternative driveway geometrics with a design review for vehicle sales facility on 9.67 acres.

And the design review and denial of waiver development standards three.

Spring Valley Town Advisory Board members were concerned though with the retaining wall height.

Staff recommends approval of waiver development standards 1, 2, and 4 in the design review and denial of the waiver development standards number 3.

Staff has received three cards in protest.

Items 30 through 34 on tonight's agenda are request by the applicant to hold until the April 21st, 2026 Planning Commission meeting.

This concludes the non-routine portion items on tonight's agenda.

At this time, I'm happy to entertain any questions the members of the commission may have.

All right, seeing no more lights, then I will move on to the next item on our agenda.

Are there any new um upcoming ordinances?

Ms.

Masumi has indicated that there are no uh new or upcoming ordinances to discuss, Mr.

Chairman.

All right, thank you very much.

Um, and then are there any just um administrative items to discuss?

There are no additional administrative items to discuss, Mr.

Chairman.

All right, so with that, I um two things.

Um just want to note that um Commissioner Wrightman is here for the for the meeting.

And then second is um since we'll just make it to the last item of our of our briefing, which is um open it up for public comments.

Seeing no one coming down for public comments, we'll close that part of the meeting.

I'm sorry, go ahead.

I just wanted to introduce our principal planner uh Jose Mendoza.

He joined us from Texas.

So he is with current planning division.

So well, well, welcome, Jose.

Um it won't be as humid, but it will still be hot.

And we're and we're going into that part of the season right now.

So so welcome and we're we're I'm glad you're able to join us and be a part of the of the of the team.

All right, that's right.

So so we're so we're gonna close um close public comments and we're gonna close the meeting or close the briefing.

Um we're adjourned.