Clark County Board of County Commissioners Zoning Meeting – March 18, 2026
Clark County Board of County Commissioners Zoning Meeting – March 18, 2026
The Clark County Board of County Commissioners held a zoning meeting on March 18, 2026, at 9:00 AM in the Commission Chambers. The meeting addressed routine consent items, multiple public hearings for development proposals, an appeal, and ordinance introductions. Several items were held to future dates. The meeting included public comments from residents and community advocates.
Consent Calendar
- Items 4-14 were approved together in a single motion, including zoning, use permits, waivers, design reviews, plan amendments, and development agreements. Item 7 (WS-25-0872) was approved with an added public works condition: no fencing within the site visibility zone. Item 10 (ZC-25-0904) was withdrawn by the applicant.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Lauren DePrete (spelled D-I-P-R-E-T-E) spoke during the first public comment period, opposing waiver requests to eliminate street landscaping, reduce setbacks, and increase fill heights in the Rural Preservation (RNP) overlay. She argued that the proposed changes would compromise safety for equestrians, reduce climate resilience, and undermine the character of rural neighborhoods. She requested that new construction be limited to single-story to match existing homes.
- Al Rojas commented on a planned rally on March 28, expressing concern about potential vandalism, and noted that the county’s camping ordinance has led to some arrests but repeat offenders are released quickly. He urged coordination with the DA and judges.
- Margaret Coleman spoke during the second public comment period about personal financial matters, requesting assistance with a trust and career change. No board action was taken.
Discussion Items
- Item 16 (UC-26-0015 – Pettus Family): Holdover use permits for a vehicle paint/body shop and outdoor storage with multiple waivers. The applicant (Brett Flory of Cross Architects) described plans to update the existing site while retaining fencing and an attached sidewalk. Al Rojas spoke in support due to needed fencing to deter homeless encampments. Approved subject to updated plans.
- Items 18-20 (VS-26-0021, UC-26-0020, TM-26-500002 – Galkos, LLC): Related items for vacating right-of-way, outdoor storage/truck parking, and a tentative map. Applicant Lucy Stewart withdrew one use permit and one waiver, revised driveway location to meet public works requirements, and agreed to remove chains and bollards from an existing driveway. Approved as amended.
- Item 21 (WS-25-0895 – Reineck): Waivers for a light manufacturing facility. Ken Small (SSA Architecture) noted a support letter from an adjacent property owner. A landscape peninsula was added to address parking lot requirements. Approved.
- Item 22 (WS-26-0003 – TCB Enterprises): Waivers for increased parking and reduced departure distance for a Christian Brothers Automotive facility. Applicant agreed to designate east-side parking as employee-only and install no-parking signs on Ullom Drive. Approved with additional conditions.
- Item 25 (WS-26-0055 – Daniel Perla Associates): Waivers for a two-lot single-family residential development in RNP overlay. Applicant noted consistency with area development. Approved.
- Items 23-24 (WS-26-0033, TM-26-500005 – County of Clark/Aviation): A seven-lot single-family subdivision. Applicant Tony Sless (Pulte Homes) agreed to provide full off-site improvements along Arville Street, minimum 16,000 sq ft lots, single-story homes adjacent to existing single-story, and a 5-foot asphalt walking path along Mardon. Waivers were withdrawn except for a building setback allowed on no more than 50% of lots. Approved with conditions.
- Item 26 (WS-26-0060 – County of Clark/Aviation): A four-lot cul-de-sac subdivision. Similar conditions as items 23-24: full off-sites on Arville, rural standards on Eldorado, single-story adjacent, and 16,000 sq ft minimum lots. Approved.
- Items 27-28 (WS-26-0061, TM-26-500012 – County of Clark/Aviation): An eight-lot subdivision with waivers for fill height and retaining wall. Applicant agreed to full off-sites on Arville, rural standards on Mardon and Eldorado, and a 5-foot asphalt path. Retaining wall and fill waivers retained for utility and drainage reasons. Approved.
- Items 29-32 (PA-25-700057, ZC-25-0883, VS-25-0884, WS-25-0885 – Cactus Bermuda Investments): Plan amendment, zone change, vacation, and design review for a retail center (including an Auto Zone). The zone change was reduced from CG to CN (Neighborhood Commercial) as the proposed uses fit CN. Additional conditions: daytime hours (6 AM – 10 PM), structural engineer review to increase wall heights to 8 feet, and signage limited to monument and building signs. Approved.
- Items 33-37 (PA-25-700058, ZC-25-0887, VS-25-0886, WS-25-0888, TM-25-500216 – County of Clark/Aviation): Lennar’s 57-lot subdivision on 9.39 acres. Plan amendment from RN to MN, zone change to RS-3.3, and removal of RNP overlay. Neighbors Bob Glau, Dina Young, Michael Carr, and Brian Barron opposed, citing loss of rural character and insufficient buffer. Applicant agreed to rural standards on Mistral (no street lights, reduced right-of-way width), single-story lots along west and south, and disclosures about rural life. Approved with conditions.
- Items 46-47 (ZC-26-0035, WS-26-0036 – Gipsy, LLC): Zone change to CG and waivers for parking lot expansion at an existing restaurant in the “fruit loop.” Applicant noted the expansion will add 24 parking spaces (50 to 74). Commissioner Gibson commended the applicant’s work. Approved.
- Item 48 (AC-26-900085): Appeal of denial of reasonable zoning accommodation for 16 chickens (hens) at 5614 Stingaree Circle. Applicants Steven and Nadine Joyner cited therapeutic benefits and large backyard. Property owner Jorge Alarcon supported. Commissioner Segerblom requested a private meeting to learn more about the disability and accommodation. Item held to April 8, 2026. The owner was granted an extension on related code violations pending outcome.
- Item 49 (AG-26-900139): Discussion to initiate a master plan amendment for APN 162-36-601-004, where the zoning was permanently changed to residential but the master plan still shows commercial. Direction given to staff to initiate the amendment.
Key Outcomes
- Consent Items (4-14): Approved unanimously with one added condition for item 7.
- Item 16: Approved subject to updated plans.
- Items 18-20: Approved as amended (withdrawals and revised driveway).
- Item 21: Approved.
- Item 22: Approved with extra conditions (employee-only parking, no-parking signs).
- Item 25: Approved.
- Items 23-24: Approved with conditions (minimum lot size 16,000 sq ft, single-story adjacent, full off-sites, detached sidewalk requirements).
- Item 26: Approved with similar conditions.
- Items 27-28: Approved with conditions, including retaining wall and fill waivers.
- Items 29-32: Approved with zone change reduced to CN, daytime hours, wall height study, and signage limits.
- Items 33-37: Approved with conditions (rural standards on Mistral, no street lights, single-story buffer, disclosures).
- Items 46-47: Approved.
- Item 48: Held to April 8, 2026, for further discussion.
- Item 49: Direction given to initiate master plan amendment.
- Items 50-55: Ordinances introduced; public hearings set for April 8, 2026.
- The board also agreed to add a discussion item for the April 8 meeting on Title 30 updates and to consider requiring rural lifestyle signs in RNP areas to inform prospective buyers, as requested by Commissioner Kirkpatrick.
- Commissioner Kirkpatrick also requested a discussion on enhanced enforcement of truck parking regulations in residential neighborhoods.
Meeting Transcript
Meeting. This public comment is only for items that are listed on today's agenda. Comments during this time must relate to a specific agenda item. If you wish to speak about a particular agenda item, you may comment at the beginning of the meeting, or you may wait to see if that item is discussed later and includes an opportunity for public comment when the item is being considered. Some routine items may be approved together as part of what is called the consent agenda. If you do not agree with a staff recommendation for one of these items, you must request that that item be removed before the board takes action. If it is not removed, it may be approved early in the meeting as part of a single vote. Items that are not routine are considered one at a time and may include an opportunity for public comment before the board votes. When it's time to speak, please come forward. There are three microphones available, including a handheld microphone if you have documents you would like to show. If you wish to show a document, an overhead camera may be used at the direction of the board chair. Please do not display documents that contain personal or sensitive information. When speaking, please talk directly into the microphone, clearly and at a steady value. This helps ensure your comments are heard and recorded as part of the public record. Speakers are required to state their name, spell their last name, and state their address. At the end of the meeting, there is a second public comment period. This final public comment is for items not listed on the agenda. No action may be taken on those comments at that time. All public comments are limited to three minutes unless otherwise announced by the chair at the beginning of the meeting. During all public comment periods, board members may listen but are not allowed to respond. Thank you for being here and for taking the time to participate in your local government. Good morning. Welcome to the March 18th zoning meeting of the Clark County Commission. Anyone wishing to speak on any items that are on today's agenda can come forward at this time. You can speak for up to three minutes. And when you do so, please state your full name for the record. Good morning. Morning. Um my name is Lauren Depreet, D I P R E T E. I don't want to interrupt you, but those items are off the routine agenda, so you can speak to them now, but they will also have a separate public hearing. If you speak now, you can't also speak then. So it's your choice. Absolutely. Thank you for that. I'm I have to take time off work right now, so I'd rather knock it out now and then let you all do what you're gonna do. Thank you. Um I'm here to respectfully yet strongly oppose the waiver requests to eliminate street landscaping, reduce setbacks, and increase fill heights for these projects. Clark County's rural preservation zoning district was created with a very clear purpose to maintain rural character, low density development, open space, and an equestrian lifestyle. The development standards, including setbacks and landscaping, are not arbitrary. These are the very tools the county uses to implement the master plan and protect the integrity of these neighborhoods. In our community, horses are not symbolic. They're part of daily life. Residents ride directly from their properties just along the street to the Western Trails Equestrian Park, which is less than a mile away from these projects. That space functions as a safety buffer for riders, horses, pedestrians, and drivers. Reducing setbacks narrow that buffer and introduces avoidable risk. Horses can spook, vehicles can pass too closely. The existing standards were designed to prevent exactly those conflicts. Granting a waiver undermines the intent of the rural preservation district. In one, if one property is allowed to deviate from the standards, it sets precedents that weakens the protections every homeowner relied on when choosing to live here. The landscaping requirement is also important.
openpublica.com