Civil Service Board for Metropolitan Police Department Meeting - June 25, 2026
Civil Service Board for Metropolitan Police Department Meeting - June 25, 2026
The Civil Service Board for the Metropolitan Police Department convened on June 25, 2026, at 10:00 AM. The meeting covered roll call, approval of minutes, a consent agenda comprising six staffing lists, and an update to the Facilities Project Manager classification specification.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of Minutes: The board approved the minutes from the previous meeting with corrections (adding a trustee's name and noting Ms. Marcus Morris was not present). Motion by Ms. Bible, second by Mr. Smith. Unanimous vote.
- Consent Agenda: Six lists were presented for approval: four open competitive (police recruit, corrections recruit for May, 911 professional for May, cadet for May) and two promotional (corrections lieutenant, police dispatch professional). Motion by Mr. Daggett, second by Mrs. Smith. Unanimous vote.
Discussion Items
- Classification Update – Facilities Project Manager: Staff presented a proposal to update the classification specification to reflect current duties. Board member Ms. Bible noted an awkward phrasing in paragraph nine on page two regarding payment approval. The recommended adjustment was to change language to "schedule completion throughout phases of construction" or similar. Staff agreed to revise the wording.
Key Outcomes
- Approved Classification Update: The board approved the updated Facilities Project Manager classification specification, with a directive to correct the noted language issue. Motion by Ms. Bible, second by Mr. Daggett. Unanimous vote.
- No Public Comments: No additional public comments were made at the close of the meeting.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Let's call the order at a meeting for the Civil Service Board for the Metropolitan Police Department for June twenty-fifth, twenty twenty-six. Order of business will be to call the role. We have Mr. Scott Davis, Counsel, Charlotte Bible, trustee, myself, Elsin Simpson, Mr. Greg Smith, Greg Smith, and Mr. Cameron Daggett, Miss Talesa McMorris, and Captain Younger. Please identify yourself by voice. Scott Davis. Cameron Dagg. Cameron Dagger. Talesa Marcus Morris. Joshua Younger. Next order of business will be public comment. Anyone wishing to make a comment about any item on the agenda, please step forward and do so. Motions or comments. I can make a motion, but with a correction. Um my name was missing as a trustee on page one, and uh Miss Marcus Morris was not present. It was added. So with those couple changes on the first page, I move to approve. Second. Move by Miss Bible, second by Mr. Smith. Cast your vote, please. Motion carries. Next order of business will be the consent agenda. Thank you. So we do have a total of I'm sorry. I just pronouncing your name right. No worries. Uh a total of six lists today for the board's consideration uh consider consisting of four open competitive, uh, two promotional, so police recruit, uh, corrections recruit for May, nine one one professional for May, uh, cadet for May, corrections lieutenant, and then police dispatch professional. Uh, you have been provided the packets unless you have any further questions. I have nothing else. Any questions or comments? Motion. I provide a motion to pass it. Second. Moved by Mr. Daggett, second by Mrs. Smith. Cash your vote, please. Motion carries. Thank you. So this is part of our ongoing task to try to keep our class specs updated so that they currently reflect the duties of the position. And so this is just for the facilities project manager updating to reflect the current functions of the position. Any questions or comments I just have a comment or question I guess on page two paragraph nine there was a change that it doesn't make sense the way it reads it um starts approve or recommend for approval payments to contractors upon completed completion of throughout phases of construction. Either it I think it should be upon completion of scheduled phases of construction or scheduled completion of certain phases of construction. This is that the wording is awkward. Okay we will make that note scheduled completion of certain phases of construction or actually throughout I believe the language of certain they wanted to remove that so it's throughout so completion throughout phases of construction through that doesn't sound isn't completion or maybe completion throughout maybe it's just taking out the of okay it just there's just it's an awkward schedule completion throughout phases of construction. Okay.
openpublica.com