OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Clark County, Nevada/Meeting Portal
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Clark County Police Fatality Public Fact-Finding Review into Death of Quentin Baker (October 28, 2026)

Meeting Portal — Wednesday, October 28, 2026
BodyClark County, Nevada
SessionMeeting Portal
DateWednesday, October 28, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 49:39

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Ozzie Fumo · Speaker 1Inferred

0:01

Yes, ready.

0:02

Good morning.

0:03

Welcome to today's police fatality public fact finding review concerning the death of Quentin Baker on February 3rd, 2026.

0:11

My name is Ozzie Fumo, and I will be presiding over today's proceeding.

0:15

This review is being held because the Clark County District Attorney's Office made a preliminary determination that no criminal prosecution of the officers involved in the death of Quentin Baker is appropriate.

0:25

Clark County Ordinance Chapter 2.12 requires a public review following such a determination.

0:31

This is not a trial.

0:33

The purpose of today's proceeding is to present the public with the essential facts surrounding the death of Mr.

0:37

Baker.

0:38

Chief Deputy District Attorney Hillary Heap will present today's fact finding review on behalf of the district attorney's office.

0:44

She will determine the witnesses or witness to be called.

0:47

The ordinance does not provide subpoena power on my behalf and does not allow for any other party to call witnesses.

0:53

Mr.

0:54

Josh Tomchuk has been appointed to be the ombudsman.

0:56

He represents both the public and the Baker family.

0:59

He will have the opportunity to ask questions of the witness or witnesses.

1:03

The procedure of quite for questioning today's witnesses shall be informal with a view to providing the public with relevant information regarding the use of force.

1:11

The rules of evidence shall not be strictly enforced.

1:14

Members of the public observing this review may submit proposed written questions on forms located in the back of this room and present it to one of the officers.

1:22

I will ask the questions unless I determine whether it is a relevant, redundant, or an abuse of the review process.

Unassigned speaker

1:29

At

Ozzie Fumo · Speaker 1Inferred

1:29

the conclusion of this review, no formal determination regarding the manner or cause of death shall be rendered.

1:35

Do either of the parties have anything to

Unassigned speaker

1:37

add?

Speaker 2

1:39

No.

Ozzie Fumo · Speaker 1Inferred

1:40

I do not.

1:41

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

1:42

Ms.

Ozzie Fumo · Speaker 1Inferred

1:43

Pit, please feel free to call your first witness.

Speaker 2

1:45

Thank you.

1:46

I call Detective Brian Walter.

Unassigned speaker

1:48

Good

Speaker 2

1:49

morning, sir.

Speaker 3

1:50

Good morning.

Speaker 2

1:51

Where do you work?

Unassigned speaker

1:52

I

Speaker 3

1:52

am currently employed with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department on their force investigation team.

Speaker 2

1:57

And what is the force investigation team?

Speaker 3

1:59

We investigate officer involved shootings, uh, felony crimes, or crimes with substantial body harm against officers or anybody who is injured in a police operation or in custody deaths.

Unassigned speaker

2:10

Okay.

Speaker 2

2:11

And

Unassigned speaker

2:11

I

Speaker 2

2:12

want to direct your attention to February 3rd of this year.

2:14

Did you have an opportunity to respond to an officer involved shooting at the 8400 block of South Maryland Parkway here in Las Vegas, Clark County?

Speaker 3

2:22

Yes, ma'am.

Speaker 2

2:23

And in preparation for today's testimony, did you prepare a PowerPoint presentation?

Speaker 3

2:28

Yes.

Speaker 2

2:28

Okay.

2:29

I'd like to begin with the overview of the area.

2:31

Can you please give us a description of where this occurred?

Speaker 3

2:34

The OIS location is uh in the middle of the screen near the intersection of Maryland Parkway and East Wigwam Avenue.

Speaker 2

2:44

And is uh there a close-up map that we can look at as well?

2:47

Thank you.

Speaker 3

2:48

Yes, this is an overview of the apartment complex.

2:50

The uh suspect vehicle was located at the top of the uh screen.

2:53

The suspect's apartment, the assault with the daily weapon, that's the AWDW that occurred prior to police arrival, and then the officer involved shooting location.

Unassigned speaker

3:03

Okay,

Speaker 2

3:04

now can you please review the subject officers?

Speaker 3

3:07

First officer is Officer Damon O'Donnell.

3:10

He was hired in 2024.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████91%
Procedural███7%
Public Works█2%
Summary of Proceedings

Clark County Police Fatality Public Fact-Finding Review: Death of Quentin Baker (October 28, 2026)

This public fact-finding review was convened on October 28, 2026, by presiding officer Ozzie Fumo under Clark County Ordinance Chapter 2.12 after the Clark County District Attorney's Office made a preliminary determination that no criminal prosecution of the involved officers was appropriate. The proceeding was not a trial; its purpose was to present the essential facts surrounding the death of Quentin Baker, who was fatally shot on February 3, 2026, at the 8400 block of South Maryland Parkway in Las Vegas. Chief Deputy District Attorney Hillary Heap presented the review, Detective Brian Walter of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Force Investigation Team testified, and Josh Tomchuk served as ombudsman for the public and the Baker family.

Proceedings Overview

  • Presiding officer Ozzie Fumo explained that the review was required by Clark County Ordinance Chapter 2.12 after the District Attorney's Office declined to prosecute.
  • The ordinance did not provide subpoena power and did not allow other parties to call witnesses; the ombudsman was permitted to ask questions of the witness.
  • The rules of evidence were not strictly enforced, and no formal determination regarding the manner or cause of death was to be rendered.
  • Members of the public could submit written questions; none were offered.

Incident and Investigation Findings

  • The decedent, Quentin Baker, was 28 years old and a Las Vegas resident. The child victim, Kentray Baker, was 3 years old and was Quentin Baker's son.
  • If he had survived, Baker's applicable charges would have included murder with a deadly weapon, kidnapping with a deadly weapon, two counts of assault with a deadly weapon, domestic-violence-related assault with a deadly weapon, battery domestic violence, strangulation, child abuse, and battery with a deadly weapon against a first responder.
  • Autopsies conducted by Dr. Nathan Schaller on February 4, 2026, determined the cause of death for both Quentin Baker and Kentray Baker as multiple gunshot wounds; the manner of death was homicide. Quentin Baker's toxicology was positive for cannabis and ethanol.
  • Kentray Baker's gunshot wounds were described as an intermediate-range gunshot wound of the left buttocks with partial exit and a contact entrance gunshot wound of the head with exit.
  • Baker's firearm was a Glock 43X 9mm. Investigation revealed that seven rounds were fired from it, with one spent cartridge case jammed in the chamber and one live round remaining in the magazine.
  • Officer Damon O'Donnell, 26, hired in 2024, fired two rounds from a Springfield Prodigy 9mm. Officer Jonathan Lowe, 39, hired in 2019, fired three rounds from a Geissele MK4 .223 rifle. Lieutenant Peacock did not fire his weapon. All three had body-worn cameras activated.

Timeline of Events

  • At 0119:23, RP called 911 and reported that Baker had slapped TIJ and was trying to take their son Kentray. At 0127:08, dispatch updated that Baker had shot TIJ's tire and left with Kentray.
  • Officers located Baker's unoccupied, running vehicle at the apartment complex entrance at 0131:53. Officers met and spoke with TIJ and RP at 0136:49. A spent cartridge case was located in the parking lot at 0139:26.
  • At 0152:07, Baker exited the apartment holding Kentray and walked toward officers. At 0153:09, Officer O'Donnell fired the first shot, followed closely by Officer Lowe. Baker also fired his weapon as he fell.
  • Officers approached to take Baker into custody at 0153:35; canine officer Camacho moved Kentray away at 0153:37 and carried him to the front of the complex at 0155:32 as an ambulance arrived.
  • Officers began life-saving measures on Baker at 0201:54. Clark County Fire Department arrived at 0210:2 and ceased medical aid for Baker at 0214:5.
  • Kentray arrived at UMC at 0221:52 and was pronounced deceased by Dr. Lewis at 0231.

Victim Account and Threats

  • RP told investigators that she and Baker had been dating for seven years and had one child together. After Baker disclosed to TIJ that he was gay, an argument began.
  • According to RP, Baker slapped TIJ, pointed a gun at TIJ, punched RP in the head multiple times, and choked RP until she believed she was going to die.
  • Baker took Kentray, shot TIJ's vehicle tire, and later told RP that if police got involved he would kill Kentray and himself. He reportedly said, "If you don't tell them to call this shit off and if they try to come up these stairs I'm blowing Kentray's brains out and blowing mine out," and added that police would have to kill him.

Officer and Witness Statements

  • Lieutenant Peacock stated he treated the incident as a hostage barricade, was concerned for Kentray's safety, and told the officer with the rifle to take the shot if he had it. After the shooting, he moved Baker's gun away and had Baker handcuffed.
  • Officer O'Donnell stated he saw Baker holding a handgun pointed at Kentray, gave verbal commands, and fired his second shot because Baker was still standing and still pointing the gun at Kentray after the first shot. He said he did not hear Lieutenant Peacock's "take the shot" command due to auditory exclusion.
  • Officer Lowe stated he aimed at Baker's right torso to avoid hitting Kentray and fired three shots because he feared for the safety of Kentray and his fellow officers.
  • Sergeant Allen stated he believed Baker also fired his weapon four or five times and that Officer O'Donnell may have thought Lieutenant Peacock's command was directed at him.
  • Detective Walter expressed the view that Baker "dictated the series of events" and that officers had no choice once Baker exited the apartment holding his son with a gun pointed at the child. He also acknowledged that firing at Baker created a potential risk to the child.

Ombudsman Inquiry

  • Ombudsman Josh Tomchuk asked about the dynamic nature of the incident, dispatch codes, containment versus immediate action, why SWAT was not called, the air unit's recording, the source of the child's gunshot wounds, and whether officers' firing increased the risk to Kentray.
  • Detective Walter testified that body-worn camera evidence indicated Officer O'Donnell fired first, followed by Officer Lowe, and then Baker. He stated that Baker's repeated trigger pulls suggested voluntary discharges, though Baker could not be interviewed.
  • Detective Walter could not identify which weapon fired the bullets that struck Kentray, and the coroner did not attribute the child's wounds to a specific firearm.
  • Detective Walter confirmed that an air unit was overhead but that its recording did not capture the shooting because the camera was switching between normal and infrared modes at the time. No officer reported that helicopter noise impaired communication.
  • Detective Walter did not know why other armed witness officers present did not fire.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public spoke or submitted written questions during the review.

Key Outcomes

  • The review concluded without any formal determination regarding the manner or cause of death.
  • The Clark County District Attorney's Office's preliminary determination that no criminal prosecution of the officers was appropriate was the basis for the review; no contrary ruling was made.
  • The law enforcement investigation documents provided by the District Attorney's Office to the ombudsman and presiding officer were identified as public record.
  • A video recording of the entire proceeding was stated to be available on the Clark County website.

Meeting Transcript

Yes, ready. Good morning. Welcome to today's police fatality public fact finding review concerning the death of Quentin Baker on February 3rd, 2026. My name is Ozzie Fumo, and I will be presiding over today's proceeding. This review is being held because the Clark County District Attorney's Office made a preliminary determination that no criminal prosecution of the officers involved in the death of Quentin Baker is appropriate. Clark County Ordinance Chapter 2.12 requires a public review following such a determination. This is not a trial. The purpose of today's proceeding is to present the public with the essential facts surrounding the death of Mr. Baker. Chief Deputy District Attorney Hillary Heap will present today's fact finding review on behalf of the district attorney's office. She will determine the witnesses or witness to be called. The ordinance does not provide subpoena power on my behalf and does not allow for any other party to call witnesses. Mr. Josh Tomchuk has been appointed to be the ombudsman. He represents both the public and the Baker family. He will have the opportunity to ask questions of the witness or witnesses. The procedure of quite for questioning today's witnesses shall be informal with a view to providing the public with relevant information regarding the use of force. The rules of evidence shall not be strictly enforced. Members of the public observing this review may submit proposed written questions on forms located in the back of this room and present it to one of the officers. I will ask the questions unless I determine whether it is a relevant, redundant, or an abuse of the review process. At the conclusion of this review, no formal determination regarding the manner or cause of death shall be rendered. Do either of the parties have anything to add? No. I do not. Okay. Ms. Pit, please feel free to call your first witness. Thank you. I call Detective Brian Walter. Good morning, sir. Good morning. Where do you work? I am currently employed with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department on their force investigation team. And what is the force investigation team? We investigate officer involved shootings, uh, felony crimes, or crimes with substantial body harm against officers or anybody who is injured in a police operation or in custody deaths. Okay. And I want to direct your attention to February 3rd of this year. Did you have an opportunity to respond to an officer involved shooting at the 8400 block of South Maryland Parkway here in Las Vegas, Clark County? Yes, ma'am. And in preparation for today's testimony, did you prepare a PowerPoint presentation? Yes. Okay. I'd like to begin with the overview of the area. Can you please give us a description of where this occurred?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com