OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Clarksville, Indiana/Town Council & Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Clarksville Council Meeting — November 2, 2026: Water Adjustment and Opioid Funds

Town Council & Commissions — Monday, November 2, 2026
BodyClarksville, Indiana
SessionTown Council & Commissions
DateMonday, November 2, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 9:25

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Time every year, and then towards the end of the year, they go back down to minimal usage.

0:06

It's not always minimum bill, sometimes it is.

0:10

Something else I noted when researching this is each year, their 12 month average is doubling.

Unassigned speaker

0:18

So

Speaker 1

0:18

if you look at the very bottom line of the graph I have here,

Unassigned speaker

0:22

their

Speaker 1

0:22

12-month average in 2023 was 10,269 gallons.

0:27

24, it went to over 22,000 gallons.

0:31

25, 48, 952.

0:34

And 2026, it's 94,000.

0:38

I don't dispute they had a leak.

0:40

They absolutely did.

0:42

They do deserve an adjustment.

0:44

I don't feel like the 14,000 is a reasonable number.

0:48

I have put two potential scenarios on this paper.

0:52

Um the far right hand columns.

0:56

If we go strictly off their 2025 12 month average, I've gone through and in black are the months where they went over that average, and that's the number of gallons.

1:08

The last column is if we double it like they have historically, that's what those numbers would

Unassigned speaker

1:14

be.

Unassigned speaker

1:15

So

Speaker 1

1:16

if we go with their 25 average, their overage for the year is 746,935 gallons at a dollar 24 per 100 gallons, which is our current rate, that gives a total adjustment of 9,261 dollars and 99 cents.

1:36

Um taking from that the 1,01019 cent adjustment we've already given them to match Indiana American water.

Unassigned speaker

1:45

Uh

Speaker 1

1:46

that takes a total adjustment to 9,251 dollars and eighty cents.

1:52

And then if we wanted to include the late penalties we've charged them this year, that's that next total of 1,408 and six cents, which would be a total adjustment of $9,659 and 86 cents.

2:11

Um we started talking with Park early in the year when their usage spiked.

2:18

They came several times.

2:19

We had conversations.

2:20

They did um, I want to say it was April when they went to research it and they found the leak, and then it wasn't repaired until July.

2:31

Nine months is a long time to go without with a leak without it being repaired.

2:36

Did they have a leak absolutely?

2:38

I don't think $14,000 is a reasonable amount, considering their history.

2:48

Thank

Unassigned speaker

2:48

you,

Speaker 2

2:50

any other?

2:52

Uh, what I would like to do, yeah.

2:54

Go ahead.

Speaker 3

2:54

Sorry.

2:55

Okay, so I I don't I just I don't disagree with everything you

Unassigned speaker

3:00

said,

Speaker 3

3:00

but I do I we we were notified that we had a leak from the town of Clarksville, and we made the repair two days later.

3:09

So we we we didn't know if we had a leak or not.

3:11

We had a third party verified the next

Unassigned speaker

3:13

day.

Speaker 3

3:14

The issue that we found, and I have uh videos, I have pictures.

3:18

The issue we found was where the water service comes into the building.

3:21

There's a plastic, it's a it's a poly water line underground with a plastic connection, right?

3:28

Underground, and then a um copper pipe going underground into our building as our service is where the service comes

Unassigned speaker

3:36

in.

Speaker 3

3:36

I I I see understand that you have trends year to year that say that one of warmer months uh there is more usage.

3:45

We're a bank.

3:46

We have we know we don't have more customers in the uh warmer months.

3:50

We have two restrooms and two kitchenettes in

Unassigned speaker

3:53

that building.

Speaker 3

3:53

It's not like we're we're using a lot of

Unassigned speaker

3:55

water.

Speaker 3

3:56

The if warmer months show trends of higher usage, I would I would say that expanding and contrasting of that plastic fitting that was leaking is probably the reason for

Unassigned speaker

4:07

that.

Unassigned speaker

4:12

We

Speaker 3

4:12

now in 2025, I don't believe 2025 is a good baseline because we had a toilet replacement in 2025, which we did not ask for an adjustment for excess usage because the water actually did go into the storm

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Water And Wastewater Management█████████████████████████████████████████████80%
Public Health███████████20%
Summary of Proceedings

Clarksville Council Meeting — November 2, 2026

The meeting, beginning at 11:15 UTC on November 2, 2026, covered a requested water-bill adjustment for Park CU and a discussion of the town’s opioid settlement funds. No formal votes were recorded in the transcript; the water adjustment was deferred to the next council meeting, and the opioid fund item was discussion-only. No adjournment time was stated.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • A Park CU representative disputed the characterization that the leak went unrepaired for nine months. The representative said the bank was notified by the town of Clarksville of a leak and repaired it two days later, with third-party verification the next day. The representative described the leak at the underground water-service connection—an underground poly water line with a plastic connection leading to copper pipe—and said warmer-month usage could reflect expansion and contraction of that fitting. The representative also said 2025 was not a good baseline because a toilet replacement occurred that year, and explained that billing runs two months behind, which is why the request came late in the year.

Discussion Items

  • Water bill adjustment request: Staff presented usage analysis for Park CU, noting the account’s 12-month average has doubled annually: 10,269 gallons in 2023, over 22,000 gallons in 2024, 48,952 gallons in 2025, and 94,000 gallons in 2026. Staff did not dispute that a leak occurred and that an adjustment was deserved, but argued $14,000 was not reasonable. Using the 2025 12-month average, staff calculated 746,935 gallons of overage at $1.24 per 100 gallons, a $9,261.99 adjustment; after an already-provided adjustment, the total would be $9,251.80; including $1,408.06 in late penalties charged this year would make $9,659.86. Staff said discussions with Park began early in the year when usage spiked; the leak was researched in April and not repaired until July. Council members raised the town’s three-month adjustment policy and asked for a three-month calculation rather than a nine-month one; the presenter said it could be sent to Glenn tomorrow. Council members and staff discussed that the town has sometimes gone back longer than three months, but three months is the baseline.
  • Opioid settlement funds: The council president opened the item because end-of-year opioid funds are available and an additional amount had been received. A.D. explained that municipalities receive state opioid settlement money into two funds: unrestricted and restricted. Unrestricted funds can be used largely as the council deems fit, with the intent of investing in community efforts to prevent or address opioid addiction; restricted funds carry many limitations. A.D. said an official state opinion letter breaking down the rules had been emailed to council members the previous night.

Key Outcomes

  • The water adjustment request was taken under advisement and deferred to the next council meeting; staff was asked to provide a three-month adjustment scenario.
  • No decision or vote was recorded on the opioid fund discussion.

Meeting Transcript

Time every year, and then towards the end of the year, they go back down to minimal usage. It's not always minimum bill, sometimes it is. Something else I noted when researching this is each year, their 12 month average is doubling. So if you look at the very bottom line of the graph I have here, their 12-month average in 2023 was 10,269 gallons. 24, it went to over 22,000 gallons. 25, 48, 952. And 2026, it's 94,000. I don't dispute they had a leak. They absolutely did. They do deserve an adjustment. I don't feel like the 14,000 is a reasonable number. I have put two potential scenarios on this paper. Um the far right hand columns. If we go strictly off their 2025 12 month average, I've gone through and in black are the months where they went over that average, and that's the number of gallons. The last column is if we double it like they have historically, that's what those numbers would be. So if we go with their 25 average, their overage for the year is 746,935 gallons at a dollar 24 per 100 gallons, which is our current rate, that gives a total adjustment of 9,261 dollars and 99 cents. Um taking from that the 1,01019 cent adjustment we've already given them to match Indiana American water. Uh that takes a total adjustment to 9,251 dollars and eighty cents. And then if we wanted to include the late penalties we've charged them this year, that's that next total of 1,408 and six cents, which would be a total adjustment of $9,659 and 86 cents. Um we started talking with Park early in the year when their usage spiked. They came several times. We had conversations. They did um, I want to say it was April when they went to research it and they found the leak, and then it wasn't repaired until July. Nine months is a long time to go without with a leak without it being repaired. Did they have a leak absolutely? I don't think $14,000 is a reasonable amount, considering their history. Thank you, any other? Uh, what I would like to do, yeah. Go ahead. Sorry. Okay, so I I don't I just I don't disagree with everything you said, but I do I we we were notified that we had a leak from the town of Clarksville, and we made the repair two days later. So we we we didn't know if we had a leak or not. We had a third party verified the next day. The issue that we found, and I have uh videos, I have pictures. The issue we found was where the water service comes into the building. There's a plastic, it's a it's a poly water line underground with a plastic connection, right? Underground, and then a um copper pipe going underground into our building as our service is where the service comes in. I I I see understand that you have trends year to year that say that one of warmer months uh there is more usage.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com