OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Clayton County, Georgia/Board of Commissioners
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Clayton County Board of Commissioners Millage Rate Hearing – September 15, 2026

Board of Commissioners — Tuesday, September 15, 2026
BodyClayton County, Georgia
SessionBoard of Commissioners
DateTuesday, September 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:20:24

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:01

Let's stand for a moment of silence, please, following by followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.

0:27

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under the indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

0:49

Okay, I would like a motion to approve the agenda, adoption of the agenda rather.

0:54

So moved.

0:55

Our second.

0:57

We have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda.

1:00

Any questions?

1:03

All in favor, say aye.

1:05

Aye.

1:06

Opposers?

1:08

Motion passes.

1:10

Our agenda items number one is the millage rate presentation, which will be followed by the public hearing.

1:19

So we will have the presentation by our CFO Mr.

1:22

Jackson.

1:29

Good morning, Board of Commissioners.

1:32

Uh, and good morning to uh our audience and our online viewers.

1:37

Uh I want to encourage our online viewers to go to the uh county's website uh www.claytoncountyga.gov to obtain a copy of the uh notice for the current 2025 property tax digest and five-year history of levy form.

2:06

Board, uh a notice of property tax increase for uh MO, which stands for maintenance and operations was posted in the Clayton County's newspaper on September 2nd, 2026.

2:21

And so this notice of tax uh increase uh shows that our final MO rollback rate is 14.141.

2:32

The 2026 MO Millage rate is 15.052, and this would be uh a percentage tax increase of 6.44%.

2:45

Uh the PT 32.1 uh is a form that we use to compute uh to compute the millage rate uh and rollback as well as the percentage increase in property taxes.

3:04

The notice of property tax increase for fire also is here.

3:09

The final fire rollback rate is four point zero six eight.

3:15

The 2026 FIRE Millage rate uh here is four point five zero zero, and we show a percentage tax increase of ten point six two percent.

3:27

And again, we also used the PT 32.1 form to compute these rates.

3:39

And so here we have uh examples of uh tax bills, and these are only uh illustrations at this point.

3:47

And so these illustrations only show the homestead exemptions.

3:53

Um we are aware that they are there are several additional exemptions out there to include the senior exemptions, the HB uh 70 exemption, as well as um exemptions for veterans as well.

4:08

So looking at this uh homestead property tax bill uh for fiscal year 2026 versus fiscal year 2027.

4:18

We have a home that has a fair market value of 250,000.

4:24

Uh assessment factor for both is 40 percent.

4:27

The assessed value is a hundred thousand dollars, less the homestead exemption for ten thousand, so the net uh taxable value is ninety thousand.

4:40

So going into the the gross millage rates, uh we have uh seventeen point nine two six for fiscal year 2026 versus uh gross millage rate of 18.520 for fiscal year 2027.

4:56

Uh and you see the respective uh the gross millage rates taxes payable.

5:02

Um for fiscal year 2026, we have the fire protection rate at 4.146.

5:10

For fiscal year 2027, we have the fire protection rate at 4.50.

5:16

As you wait, as you make your way to the bottom uh of the of these um uh examples, we see the final uh M and O taxes payable is sixteen thousand six hundred eighty-two dollars and eighty cents for fiscal year 2026.

5:34

1600 versus versus the uh final millage um M and O uh taxes payable for fiscal year 2027, which is 1,759 and uh 68 cents.

5:48

And so the difference of the two is 76 and eighty-six cents, which uh on a monthly breakdown would be six dollars and forty-one cents as far as the the tax increase to your bill monthly.

6:06

Looking at uh the next slide, we have oh, I'm sorry.

6:11

We have the example of the uh non-homestead property exemption, and so again, we have uh an example of the tax bills for fiscal year 2026 and fiscal year 2027.

6:27

And so in this scenario, we have uh a property that has a fair market value of 425 uh thousand dollars.

6:36

Um the assessment factor is the same 40 percent.

6:40

As we make our way to the bottom, the final M and O taxes payable is $3,178.66 for fiscal year 2026 versus the final MO taxable um payable for fiscal year 2027, which is $3,323.84 cents.

7:02

The difference between the two is $145.18 cents.

7:07

A monthly cost breakdown would be $12.10.

7:17

And so based upon the fiscal year 2027 uh adopted budget uh which was adopted back in June of this year, um the board chose to adopt amendment number two.

7:30

And so what this simply means is that the county needed uh the $7.8 million dollars in order to finance parts of uh the general fund operation.

7:43

So uh those uh costs included salaries at $6.4 million, which included uh a one-time incentive pay to non-sworn personnel.

7:58

Um it also included a 10% increase in pay to swarm personnel, uh, as well as a 2% cost of living adjustment for all employees countywide.

8:12

Uh there was also costs uh related to uh elections and courts that were included, as well as costs related to county operations, bringing us to a total of $7.8 million that was needed in order to balance the budget for fiscal year 2027 and board that concludes my uh presentation.

8:40

Okay, thank you.

8:41

I noticed there were several people taking pictures of the slide information.

8:48

So uh Mr.

8:49

CFO, do we have copies for the audience?

8:52

Uh of this presentation no.

8:55

Um, but however, I can um make copies for the next meeting, or we can get some copies um generated right now.

9:01

Okay, can we get some copies generated now so they'll have the information and won't have to depend on whatever pictures they've taken.

9:08

We'll do that.

9:09

Okay.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Property Tax██████████████████████████████████████████42%
Economic Development██████████████14%
Community Engagement██████████████14%
Workforce Development███████7%
Public Safety██████6%
Public Engagement██████6%
Code Enforcement████4%
Data Center Regulation███3%
Budget Equity Analysis██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Clayton County Board of Commissioners Millage Rate Hearing – September 15, 2026

The Clayton County Board of Commissioners held a public hearing on September 15, 2026, to present and receive public comment on proposed increases to the maintenance and operations (M&O) and fire millage rates for fiscal year 2027. Chief Financial Officer Terry Jackson detailed the proposed rates, the rollback calculations, and the $7.8 million budget shortfall that the increases would address, primarily for public safety salaries and operational costs. Residents voiced both support and opposition, with several speakers raising concerns about the impact on fixed-income seniors and the need for economic development to offset residential taxes. No vote was taken; the board will hold two additional hearings before adopting the millage rate on September 24, 2026.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Dr. Henry Anderson (District constituent, Hampton) expressed full support for the millage increase, noting the $76.86 annual increase ($6.41/month) for a $250,000 home with homestead exemption was affordable and necessary for public safety salaries.
  • Botney Parkinson (Jonesboro) asked whether the county receives adequate tax revenue from Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, arguing Clayton County should receive a larger share since the airport is located within the county.
  • James Davis (Riverdale, senior citizen) opposed the increase, stating that seniors on fixed incomes already face rising car insurance and other costs, and called for a cap on property taxes for seniors. He also questioned the use of property taxes for school construction funded by a previous SPLOST.
  • Sheree Arnold (Riverdale) asked how the proposed increase would affect the senior exemption voters approved the previous year, and requested a detailed breakdown of the $962,000 budget line item.
  • Gloria McLean (Jonesboro) inquired whether data centers could contribute additional funds to lower residential property taxes. Commissioners noted a current moratorium on data centers but confirmed that existing data centers already pay property taxes based on improved land value, and discussions are underway for a community benefits agreement.
  • Tanja Bostick (Jonesboro, homeowner of 20 years) expressed concern that rapid development is driving up property values and taxes, and questioned whether economic development could be suspended to relieve homeowners. Commissioners explained that economic development is essential to broaden the tax base and reduce reliance on residential property taxes, and noted a housing moratorium is in place for new developments that were approved years prior.
  • Valencia Hargrove (District 3, Jonesboro) supported development but urged the county to negotiate for more revenue from the airport and to attract desirable businesses like Trader Joe's. She also asked how residents can help promote the county.
  • William Fuller (Unincorporated College Park) advocated for trade schools to train local youth for construction jobs, and suggested taxing out-of-state developers to offset property tax increases for residents.
  • Darren Porter (Jonesboro) questioned the $7.8 million deficit and why the county is adding new positions (paramedic sergeants, firefighter EMTs) that could be filled by non-residents. Commissioners responded that 90% of county employees live in Clayton County, and that a high school firefighter training program is in place.
  • Eugenia Bernard (unstated district) praised the county’s code enforcement and asked what can be done about a local business that does not hire minorities. Commissioners directed her to speak with her district commissioner after the meeting.
  • Commissioner Marvin Tolden (District 4) suggested a joint meeting with the Board of Education and tax commissioner to discuss how school taxes affect the millage rate.

Discussion Items

  • CFO Terry Jackson presented the 2026 millage rates: for M&O, the proposed rate is 15.052 mills (rollback 14.141, a 6.44% increase); for fire, the proposed rate is 4.500 mills (rollback 4.068, a 10.62% increase). He provided examples: for a $250,000 home with homestead exemption, the annual tax increase would be $76.86 ($6.41/month); for a $425,000 non-homestead property, the increase would be $145.18 ($12.10/month). The $7.8 million increase in the general fund supports $6.4 million in salaries (including a 10% pay increase for sworn personnel, 2% COLA for all employees, and one-time incentive pay for non-sworn staff), plus costs for elections, courts, and county operations.
  • Commissioner Questions & Clarifications: Commissioners requested copies of the presentation for the audience and confirmed it would be posted on the county website. They clarified the rollback concept and emphasized that the millage rate is capped at 20 mills.
  • Board Responses to Public: Commissioners addressed concerns about economic development, noting that commercial growth reduces the residential tax burden. They encouraged residents to use Click Clayton for code enforcement complaints, attend district community meetings, and serve on county boards. The tax commissioner will hold town halls in each district to explain property tax bills.

Key Outcomes

  • No vote was taken on the millage rate at this hearing.
  • The next hearing will be held today, September 15, 2026, at 5:30 PM in the same chamber.
  • The third and final hearing will be held September 24, 2026, at 6:00 PM, at which the board will adopt the millage rate.
  • Copies of the millage rate presentation and the adopted budget amendment are available at the back table and will be uploaded to the county website (claytoncountyga.gov).

Meeting Transcript

Let's stand for a moment of silence, please, following by followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under the indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Okay, I would like a motion to approve the agenda, adoption of the agenda rather. So moved. Our second. We have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda. Any questions? All in favor, say aye. Aye. Opposers? Motion passes. Our agenda items number one is the millage rate presentation, which will be followed by the public hearing. So we will have the presentation by our CFO Mr. Jackson. Good morning, Board of Commissioners. Uh, and good morning to uh our audience and our online viewers. Uh I want to encourage our online viewers to go to the uh county's website uh www.claytoncountyga.gov to obtain a copy of the uh notice for the current 2025 property tax digest and five-year history of levy form. Board, uh a notice of property tax increase for uh MO, which stands for maintenance and operations was posted in the Clayton County's newspaper on September 2nd, 2026. And so this notice of tax uh increase uh shows that our final MO rollback rate is 14.141. The 2026 MO Millage rate is 15.052, and this would be uh a percentage tax increase of 6.44%. Uh the PT 32.1 uh is a form that we use to compute uh to compute the millage rate uh and rollback as well as the percentage increase in property taxes. The notice of property tax increase for fire also is here. The final fire rollback rate is four point zero six eight. The 2026 FIRE Millage rate uh here is four point five zero zero, and we show a percentage tax increase of ten point six two percent. And again, we also used the PT 32.1 form to compute these rates. And so here we have uh examples of uh tax bills, and these are only uh illustrations at this point. And so these illustrations only show the homestead exemptions. Um we are aware that they are there are several additional exemptions out there to include the senior exemptions, the HB uh 70 exemption, as well as um exemptions for veterans as well. So looking at this uh homestead property tax bill uh for fiscal year 2026 versus fiscal year 2027. We have a home that has a fair market value of 250,000. Uh assessment factor for both is 40 percent. The assessed value is a hundred thousand dollars, less the homestead exemption for ten thousand, so the net uh taxable value is ninety thousand. So going into the the gross millage rates, uh we have uh seventeen point nine two six for fiscal year 2026 versus uh gross millage rate of 18.520 for fiscal year 2027. Uh and you see the respective uh the gross millage rates taxes payable. Um for fiscal year 2026, we have the fire protection rate at 4.146. For fiscal year 2027, we have the fire protection rate at 4.50. As you wait, as you make your way to the bottom uh of the of these um uh examples, we see the final uh M and O taxes payable is sixteen thousand six hundred eighty-two dollars and eighty cents for fiscal year 2026. 1600 versus versus the uh final millage um M and O uh taxes payable for fiscal year 2027, which is 1,759 and uh 68 cents. And so the difference of the two is 76 and eighty-six cents, which uh on a monthly breakdown would be six dollars and forty-one cents as far as the the tax increase to your bill monthly. Looking at uh the next slide, we have oh, I'm sorry. We have the example of the uh non-homestead property exemption, and so again, we have uh an example of the tax bills for fiscal year 2026 and fiscal year 2027. And so in this scenario, we have uh a property that has a fair market value of 425 uh thousand dollars. Um the assessment factor is the same 40 percent. As we make our way to the bottom, the final M and O taxes payable is $3,178.66 for fiscal year 2026 versus the final MO taxable um payable for fiscal year 2027, which is $3,323.84 cents. The difference between the two is $145.18 cents. A monthly cost breakdown would be $12.10. And so based upon the fiscal year 2027 uh adopted budget uh which was adopted back in June of this year, um the board chose to adopt amendment number two. And so what this simply means is that the county needed uh the $7.8 million dollars in order to finance parts of uh the general fund operation. So uh those uh costs included salaries at $6.4 million, which included uh a one-time incentive pay to non-sworn personnel. Um it also included a 10% increase in pay to swarm personnel, uh, as well as a 2% cost of living adjustment for all employees countywide.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com