Transportation Committee Meeting on Burke Airport Closure and Redevelopment Concepts - April 15, 2026
Transportation Committee Meeting on Burke Airport Closure and Redevelopment Concepts - April 15, 2026
The Transportation Committee held its fourth of four scheduled meetings on the proposed closure of Burke Lakefront Airport. The administration and North Coast Waterfront Development Corporation presented high-level redevelopment concepts emphasizing recreation, public access, and economic impact. No legislation or formal votes were taken; the session served as further informational exchange.
Presentation Overview
- Deputy Chief of Staff Jessica Trevasano introduced the presentation, stating that a recreation-focused concept at Burke would require minimal public funding, increase resident access to 450 acres of lakefront, and generate five times more direct tax revenue to the city than the airport currently does (approximately $2.5 million annually vs. $500,000).
- The administration showed two conceptual fit studies: one featuring a large public park, competitive youth sports facilities, a marina, RV camping, walking trails, and a vertiport; the other replacing the park with an 18-hole public golf course. Both are meant to inform decision-making, not as definitive master plans.
- Key constraints: the land is submerged land with a lease, limiting ownership possibilities; low-density development minimizes remediation costs; the site has received No Further Action letters for most environmental concerns.
Discussion Items & Questions
- Councilman Slife asked about absorption of current airline users and whether shifting Burke operations to Hopkins would foreclose other opportunities. The administration responded that nearly all operations can move to Hopkins and that the impact would be positive, with no loss of opportunity.
- Councilman Slife also requested case studies on how similar youth sports facilities are financed, noting that a clear understanding of public costs vs. benefits is needed.
- Councilman Jones questioned the community survey process, expressing that his ward had not been directly contacted. The administration acknowledged outreach to block clubs and CDCs and committed to better coordination with council offices.
- Councilman Palencik raised concerns about the lack of legislation before council, stating he would not delegate his authority. He also asked about lobbying costs for closure (Hallehan Strategies) and requested updated demolition cost estimates.
- Councilman Harsh questioned environmental impacts of the confined disposal facilities (CDFs) and whether public access could coexist with private investment. The administration noted that CDF 9 would remain for dredge recycling and that lease agreements could require public access.
- Councilwoman Gray asked about the vertiport and air show continuity. The administration stated the air show can continue with a remote viewing area and ticket sales on the site, even without the airport.
- Councilman Shaw advocated for centering affordable housing in the vision, criticizing the focus on tourism and destination amenities. The administration responded that housing on Burke is challenging due to land lease and market conditions, but the stadium site master plan will include affordability requirements.
- Councilman Casey warned against overreach, questioning whether the city can manage 450 acres of development given existing challenges.
Public Comments
- Tim Lewis from Akron proposed reconfiguring the shoreline and adding islands to protect against storms, relocating yacht clubs, and improving access roads.
- Dennis Turchak was not present.
- Mr. Houston criticized the planning process as disconnected from residents' needs, noting that existing lakefront parks lack amenities. He urged the city to engage the community directly and questioned the ethics of large investors.
Key Outcomes
- No votes or formal decisions were made. The committee will likely hold additional hearings over the summer, including with airport operators and possibly RTA.
- The administration committed to providing case studies on youth sports facility financing, updated demolition costs, and ward-specific survey data.
- Continued community engagement was emphasized, with the administration pledging to attend council-led ward meetings.
- The overall purpose remains to inform council and the public, with any closure decision requiring federal approval and eventual council legislation.
Meeting Transcript
Good morning, everybody. We will go ahead and call this meeting of the transportation role in the committee to order. Thank you. We have a forum. There's no legislation, so we don't need a forum on these no excused absences. For uh council members Bishop and Davis, and I believe Councilman Starr is gonna be coming late. He had a ribbon cutting, and I'm sure others will trickle in as well. Uh this is our fourth of four previously scheduled meetings uh pertaining to the proposed closure of Burke Airport. Uh up to date. We have uh discussed just general site conditions, we've talked about uh the financial aspects of Burke as as it operates currently. Uh, we discussed two weeks ago uh the procedures through which one would close an airport. And today, uh what was originally planned had been sort of an abstract maybe conversation about the Northeast Ohio real estate market and how it would align with this uh property. Since then, Mayor Bibbs administration has come forth with a concept of a fit. I want to be very clear that what we're gonna be talking about today is not a definitive plan. Again, there is no legislation before this body uh pertaining to the closure of the airport. However, since the administration has gone through the effort of demonstrating at a high level what the site could accommodate, what the economics of it would be, I think it would be more useful for us to talk about that rather than to talk about uh things more abstract uh than than that presentation. Uh so with that, I'll invite the administration and uh the North Coast Waterfront Authority forward as I turn it over to you. If there's anyone in the audience who is interested in public comment, uh to the left of the clerk, uh, there is a sign-up sheet at the end of the uh presentation and all of the questions from council. Uh, we'll be able to have public comment where you can come forward and have three minutes to address the body. And with that, um, if Deputy Chief Trevasano, good morning. If you could introduce your side, especially since there's a new introduction to be made. Of course. Uh Jessica Trevasano, Deputy Chief of Staff and Chief Strategy Officer. Um, I'll let my team who's at the table with me introduce themselves. Tom McNair, Chief of Integrated Development. Uh Scott Skinner, uh, executive director of the North Coast Waterfront Development Corporation. Uh my name's Jason Russell. I'm the VP of Real Estate and Development for the North Coast Waterfront Development Corporation. Focus on planning and development of our North Coast. Good welcome. And and with that, I will turn it over to you for uh what I'm sure is going to be an interesting presentation for all. Go ahead. Thank you. Um, so good morning, everybody. We are here to talk about uh redevelopment of Berkeley Front Airport. Uh we're gonna start with an overview, meeting purpose, uh, give you a brief update on the Lakefront Stadium site. Uh, we're here to talk about BERC, but they are proximate, and I know there's uh questions about how those two sites relate to one another. We're gonna talk about the redevelopment context about clay Cleveland's real estate market overall. We're gonna talk about principles and constraints related to redevelopment of Burke, concepts and uses. We're gonna talk a bit about the air show, economic input, community input, and then anticipated next steps. We've got uh a lengthy presentation for you, so thanks for giving us giving us the time. So overall, um, with as it relates to redeveloping Burke Lake Front Airport, a recreation focused concept at Berkeley Front Airport would require minimal public funding. It would increase resident access to four hundred and fifty acres of Lakefront considerably, and it would generate five times more direct tax revenue to the city every year than Burke Lake Front Airport currently generates. I'll pause just to maybe re-emphasize in previous meetings. Uh, we've really focused on the direct tax impact of the airport in that land. So this isn't talking about like heads and beds and you know, all of the ancillary tax benefits. This is truly just like income property, parking tax, you know, direct tax benefits from the site to the city. Uh the redevelopment concept that we'll show you today is relatively low-hanging fruit and would generate five times more direct economic impact, uh, direct tax revenue to the city. Uh, we'll talk about today how redeveloping BERC will not prevent an air show from operating in Cleveland. Uh, low density recreation focused development does not prevent higher density development from occurring in the future.
openpublica.com