OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Cleveland, Ohio/City Council Meetings
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Cleveland City Council Safety Committee Meeting - September 23, 2026

City Council Meetings — Wednesday, September 23, 2026
BodyCleveland, Ohio
SessionCity Council Meetings
DateWednesday, September 23, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:29:46

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:00

Back to the fifth to Okay.

0:02

Did you get any feedback or any thoughts why there was no referrals?

0:09

Through the chair to the committee, no.

0:13

Well, that's something I would hope the safe directors in the back of the room.

0:16

I hope he's listening to this.

0:18

And then I hope he can men he um um relates this to the chief as well.

0:23

If you have a program that's attempting to help young people before they do wind up behind bars, unfortunately, then I would like to think that we would promote this program and try to make everybody aware of it and make certainly the police officer that are working our streets, um, where we can hopefully get a young person on a different path and get a family member engaged in this process so they don't wind up with a criminal record.

0:54

Um I think that's very important uh to the in today's world.

0:58

So I'm gonna stop there.

0:59

Are the other questions?

1:01

Because I'm gonna open up for my colleagues, I'm gonna open up for questions.

1:03

Any other you have any?

1:05

To the chair and then committee, I also wanted to echo in addition to your comments.

1:09

Um, that the the uh key significant part of this pilot that we need to emphasize is we're trying to prevent young people from getting that record that prevents them from getting into a system that makes it hard for them to get jobs.

1:23

Yes.

1:24

Um a lot of these young people don't understand that once you go before the court system, it is very hard when running background checks for certain opportunities that these youth um violations that end up in the system carry on even once they get into an adult and can prevent them from some key opportunities of employment.

1:43

Right.

1:43

Okay.

1:44

I'm gonna open up for questions first the vice chair, and then I have Nikki Hudson after that.

1:49

Okay.

1:50

Councilwoman Hudson.

1:52

Thank you, Mr.

1:52

Chair.

1:53

Um follow up on um the the chair's line of questioning.

1:58

Um when an officer um detains a youth, isn't it through the chair, is it in his discret in their discretion already to um drive the youth home without um you know filing charges whoever can answer that I'm I don't know if they can, I'll ask the director to come to the table who worked the the fifth, the sixth district, then the fifth district, and then uh was chief um Jack of all trades.

2:34

Okay.

2:34

Good afternoon, Chair and uh committee members.

2:37

Uh the question uh uh Councilwoman Hudson relative to an officer encountering uh juvenile with say a call for service, or the case might be.

2:45

Just it's gonna depend on the the offense.

2:49

Um they have to call contact juvenile facility uh to determine whether or not the the juvenile will be accepted into the facility.

2:59

If they are, they'll transport the juvenile there, complete their reports, um, and then move on from there.

3:06

But there is a process that that the officers uh follow based on their policies and the law.

3:12

Council lady?

3:13

Um so just to just to be clear, is it within the officers' discretion to not charge the youth and simply drive them home without this program?

3:25

It is not within their preview whether or not to charge a child well arrest a child.

3:31

If a child is involved in a criminal activity, um whatever that case might be, it is not within the officer's preview just to let that particular child go.

3:41

If the child was involved in a robbery, uh they're gonna do their jobs.

3:44

If it's petty theft, they're gonna do their their job and um follow through with the process.

3:50

This program, the past program, give gives them the opportunity officers to obviously refer the the children a child to this program if they're eligible for the program.

4:00

Um if they're not always before the program, then the officers will follow the normal course of action.

4:05

Okay, thank you.

4:06

And uh through the chair, can you give some examples of the you know the low-level offenses that would qualify uh a child for this program?

4:14

Yes, whoever yes, I can get some examples.

4:19

So those could include um typically misdemeanor level offenses, potentially unruly offenses.

4:25

Um these would include maybe uh misdemeanor theft, um, a public disturbance where um a local business may have been impacted.

4:33

Um but like I said, it's all law enforcement driven, so it doesn't mean that every circumstance, every you know, misdemeanor assault will get referred to the past program.

4:43

Um they have the ability to take into account the full circumstances as they arrive on the scene to determine if a youth may or may not be eligible to participate.

4:52

Does that include uh through the chair curfew offenses?

5:00

It could also include curfew, so we have identified that you know, in situations if you see a youth that's consistently outside, you see them at 10 o'clock, you see them at 12 o'clock, you see them at 2 a.m.

5:06

You know, that's kind of identifying there may be some underlying needs in our household, something along those lines, so those youth can also be referred to the past program because that could definitely quickly snowball into them getting into something that could be more um uh higher level or go official.

5:23

Understand, thank you.

5:24

And through the chair, to the to the director.

5:27

So if it if a youth is picked up for curfew, is it in the officer's discretion to you know drive the youth home without you know filing charges or taking them, you know, and I'm assuming that they don't have a warrant, um, but to you know, drive them home and then just speak with the parents?

5:43

Through the chair, that's a great example through council person Hudson.

5:48

That's a great example.

5:49

Uh yes, in that particular case, depending on the circumstances, yes, the officer in that particular case, whether than citing the juvenile or the parent generally, when I did it um years ago, we normally would take the juvenile back to their guardian or parent and and make a decision which was discretionary at that particular time whether or not we were gonna cite the parent for the curfew violation.

6:12

So in that particular case, it was more discretionary.

6:14

Okay, thank you.

6:15

And then just following up also about why a family might not agree to participate in this program, um, and or you know, uh other barriers to participating in this program.

6:28

Um, you know, if if a child doesn't have the um familial support, the parental support at home, does that mean that they're not eligible for this program through the chair?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety██████████████████████████████30%
Illegal Dumping███████████████████████████27%
Public Health Awareness███████████████15%
Youth Programs██████████10%
Grant Management█████5%
Procedural████4%
Waste Management████4%
Technology and Innovation███3%
Environmental Protection██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Cleveland City Council Safety Committee Meeting - September 23, 2026

The Safety Committee of the Cleveland City Council met on September 23, 2026, to discuss and vote on several ordinances, including the P.A.S.T. juvenile diversion program, expansion of EMS clinical agreements, a federal grant for public safety radios, and a state grant for illegal dumping enforcement. The committee also debated policies on AEDs, illegal dumping penalties, and staffing levels. Multiple amendments were adopted, and directives were issued for further research and data collection.

Discussion Items

Ordinance 906-2026: P.A.S.T. Juvenile Diversion Program

  • The ordinance authorizes a pilot program to divert low-level juvenile offenders from formal charges. Council members expressed concern over low referral numbers, especially from the 5th District, and noted that only 10 referrals were made in the first month (as mentioned by the chair). The program requires parental consent, which some members noted as a barrier for at-risk youth without familial support. Director Drummond and staff explained that officers' discretion is limited; they must follow existing laws and policies. Examples of qualifying offenses include misdemeanor theft, public disturbance, and curfew violations. Councilwoman Hudson asked about alternatives for youth without parental consent, and the chair suggested exploring court-appointed guardians or state-level legislative changes. Councilman Starr offered an amendment to require quarterly reports from the Director of Community Relations to the Clerk of Council and all council members. The amendment was seconded by Councilman Slife and passed unanimously. The ordinance was approved as amended.

Ordinance 745-2026: EMS Clinical Agreements

  • This ordinance amends Section 135.47 to expand EMS clinical agreements beyond Cuyahoga Community College to include other educational institutions, nonprofit organizations, and vocational centers. Commissioner Wheeler explained that this will allow partnerships with Premier EMS Training Academy and others, increasing training opportunities. The committee discussed EMS staffing: currently 291 personnel with a class of 20 starting soon, nearing full staffing of 315 budgeted positions. The chair asked about brownouts (unit closures) and coverage; the director stated that dynamically stationed units cover affected areas. Councilwoman Hudson raised the topic of AEDs after a public comment at the previous council meeting. Discussion ensued about AED costs ($800 to $10,000), their placement in city facilities, and the feasibility of mandating them in senior facilities. Councilman Jones shared personal stories and pushed for legislation requiring AEDs in senior buildings. Councilwoman Hudson noted that staff is already working on the issue. The ordinance was approved as read.

Ordinance 907-2026: Radio Grant

  • The ordinance authorizes the Director of Public Safety to apply for and accept a $1,031,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance for the purchase of 151 mobile radios for police, fire, and EMS vehicles (about 19% of the 778 mobile radios needing replacement). The grant is part of congressionally directed spending through Representative Chantel Brown. No local match is required. The committee noted a missing dollar amount on the administrative report; the law department was asked about the omission. Councilman Slife offered an amendment requiring the director to provide written notice to the clerk of council for any cooperative purchases, which was approved. Councilman Jones praised grants coordinator Dawn Hartzog and urged the administration to develop succession plans for key staff. The ordinance was approved as amended.

Ordinance 910-2026: Dumpster Grant

  • The ordinance authorizes the Director of Public Safety to accept a $17,579 grant from the Ohio Attorney General's Office for the "Shine a Light on Dumping" program. The funds will purchase nine new cameras (seven trail cameras and one pole-mounted live-feed camera) to double the current inventory of eight working cameras for illegal dumping enforcement. No local match is required. Sergeant West of the Environmental Crimes Task Force described the cameras as state-of-the-art with motion activation and night vision. Council members discussed the frustration with illegal dumping, especially from suburban haulers. The chair asked for data on prosecution and conviction rates; the director provided statistics for 2021-present: 756 cases created, 138 felony charges referred, 16 misdemeanor charges referred, 8 citations, 206 total criminal charges/citations, but noted that final dispositions are tracked by the prosecutor's offices. Councilman Jones requested a meeting to discuss camera deployment and potential use of Neighborhood Equity Funds. The committee also discussed vehicle seizure for dumping offenses; the chair asked the law department for clarification on seizing vehicles with liens. Councilman Slife offered an amendment similar to the previous one (cooperative purchase reporting), which was adopted. The ordinance was approved as amended.

Key Outcomes

  • Ordinance 906-2026 (P.A.S.T. program) approved as amended (quarterly reporting requirement).
  • Ordinance 745-2026 (EMS clinical agreements) approved as read.
  • Ordinance 907-2026 (radio grant) approved as amended (cooperative purchase reporting).
  • Ordinance 910-2026 (dumpster grant) approved as amended (cooperative purchase reporting).
  • The director was directed to review existing illegal dumping laws and propose amendments regarding increased penalties and vehicle seizure. Staff was asked to provide data on prosecution and conviction rates for illegal dumping over the past three years.
  • The committee will continue discussions on mandatory AEDs in senior facilities and potential legislation.
  • The chair requested that the administration develop a succession plan for key grant-writing staff.

Meeting Transcript

Back to the fifth to Okay. Did you get any feedback or any thoughts why there was no referrals? Through the chair to the committee, no. Well, that's something I would hope the safe directors in the back of the room. I hope he's listening to this. And then I hope he can men he um um relates this to the chief as well. If you have a program that's attempting to help young people before they do wind up behind bars, unfortunately, then I would like to think that we would promote this program and try to make everybody aware of it and make certainly the police officer that are working our streets, um, where we can hopefully get a young person on a different path and get a family member engaged in this process so they don't wind up with a criminal record. Um I think that's very important uh to the in today's world. So I'm gonna stop there. Are the other questions? Because I'm gonna open up for my colleagues, I'm gonna open up for questions. Any other you have any? To the chair and then committee, I also wanted to echo in addition to your comments. Um, that the the uh key significant part of this pilot that we need to emphasize is we're trying to prevent young people from getting that record that prevents them from getting into a system that makes it hard for them to get jobs. Yes. Um a lot of these young people don't understand that once you go before the court system, it is very hard when running background checks for certain opportunities that these youth um violations that end up in the system carry on even once they get into an adult and can prevent them from some key opportunities of employment. Right. Okay. I'm gonna open up for questions first the vice chair, and then I have Nikki Hudson after that. Okay. Councilwoman Hudson. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um follow up on um the the chair's line of questioning. Um when an officer um detains a youth, isn't it through the chair, is it in his discret in their discretion already to um drive the youth home without um you know filing charges whoever can answer that I'm I don't know if they can, I'll ask the director to come to the table who worked the the fifth, the sixth district, then the fifth district, and then uh was chief um Jack of all trades. Okay. Good afternoon, Chair and uh committee members. Uh the question uh uh Councilwoman Hudson relative to an officer encountering uh juvenile with say a call for service, or the case might be. Just it's gonna depend on the the offense. Um they have to call contact juvenile facility uh to determine whether or not the the juvenile will be accepted into the facility. If they are, they'll transport the juvenile there, complete their reports, um, and then move on from there. But there is a process that that the officers uh follow based on their policies and the law. Council lady? Um so just to just to be clear, is it within the officers' discretion to not charge the youth and simply drive them home without this program? It is not within their preview whether or not to charge a child well arrest a child. If a child is involved in a criminal activity, um whatever that case might be, it is not within the officer's preview just to let that particular child go. If the child was involved in a robbery, uh they're gonna do their jobs. If it's petty theft, they're gonna do their their job and um follow through with the process. This program, the past program, give gives them the opportunity officers to obviously refer the the children a child to this program if they're eligible for the program. Um if they're not always before the program, then the officers will follow the normal course of action. Okay, thank you. And uh through the chair, can you give some examples of the you know the low-level offenses that would qualify uh a child for this program? Yes, whoever yes, I can get some examples. So those could include um typically misdemeanor level offenses, potentially unruly offenses. Um these would include maybe uh misdemeanor theft, um, a public disturbance where um a local business may have been impacted. Um but like I said, it's all law enforcement driven, so it doesn't mean that every circumstance, every you know, misdemeanor assault will get referred to the past program. Um they have the ability to take into account the full circumstances as they arrive on the scene to determine if a youth may or may not be eligible to participate. Does that include uh through the chair curfew offenses? It could also include curfew, so we have identified that you know, in situations if you see a youth that's consistently outside, you see them at 10 o'clock, you see them at 12 o'clock, you see them at 2 a.m. You know, that's kind of identifying there may be some underlying needs in our household, something along those lines, so those youth can also be referred to the past program because that could definitely quickly snowball into them getting into something that could be more um uh higher level or go official.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com