Clinton Town Council Budget Workshop – March 2, 2026
Clinton Town Council Budget Workshop – March 2, 2026
The Town Council held a budget workshop on March 2, 2026, to review the proposed Fiscal Year 2026-27 operating and capital budgets. Town Manager Christian presented a $3.4% overall budget increase, driven by contractual obligations, inflation, and capital needs, but current taxes would rise 7.5% due to a $1.6 million reduction in the use of undesignated fund balance. The discussion covered departmental requests, capital improvements, and the impact of the state-mandated reevaluation on property tax bills.
Discussion Items
- Budget Overview: The proposed budget reflects a 3.4% increase overall, but current taxes increase by 7.5% because the revenue mix changed. The use of fund balance decreased by over $1.6 million, requiring higher current taxes to cover ongoing expenses. The mill rate has been reduced by 8.37 mills due to reevaluation, but service levels and revenue needs drive the rate.
- Building Maintenance: Department increase of 5.1%, mainly due to overtime. The manager reduced the request by $5,000, expecting a new full-time custodian to reduce Saturday overtime.
- Police Department: Request includes a new position (lateral transfer to reduce overtime), updated body cameras via Axon (five-year lease at $67,000/year, covering equipment, cloud storage, and redaction), and a $2,000 allocation for Placemakers events. Overtime through December was $141,000; historical overtime is 10–14% of salary. The body camera contract is a state requirement. Vehicle maintenance expected to decrease with fleet turnover.
- Animal Control: Increase of $7,000 due to weekend coverage for a dog held in a hoarding case; previously covered by Madison's officer.
- Emergency Management: Increase for an additional Starlink dish for critical infrastructure.
- Fire Department: Increase mainly due to repairs and maintenance; manager reduced request by $15,000 based on prior spending.
- Communications: Flat budget.
- Engineering & Professional Services: The approved part-time engineer position ($75,000) was unfilled. The manager reallocated $20,000 to Public Works professional services for drainage, MS4, etc., and $5,000 to Planning & Zoning for grants and technical assistance. The remaining $50,000 was allocated for increased economic development hours and HR consulting, avoiding new employees.
- Public Works (DPW): Repairs and maintenance line item proposed at $393,000, based on historical averages. The town manager highlighted that many costs are front-loaded (e.g., line striping, basin cleaning).
- WPCC (Water Pollution Control Commission): Request reduced from $25,000 to $15,000, including $5,000 for legal services (20 hours at $250/hour). They received a $500,000 congressional grant (reimbursable) for downtown wastewater system design.
- Senior Center: Slight increase for hours, partly to prepare for the new senior center opening. Some ARPA-funded programs were removed because ARPA funds are expended; programs may be continued with fees.
- Parks and Recreation: Contractual increases; manager reduced maintenance by $2,000.
- Harbor Commission: Increase due to reallocation of $5,000 from DPW for marina equipment.
- Shellfish Commission: Decrease because they have a $28,000 account from permits for larger projects.
- Library: No significant increase; library absorbed the Henry on Maine lease cost, saving the town. Mary Beth available for questions.
- Capital Improvement Plan (CIP): The CIP year one totals $1,073,000 from the general fund (fund 60), affecting the mill rate. Bonding totals $2.7 million, within the $3 million debt service capacity. Other funds (grants, other) also used. Key projects: police vehicle lease ($195,000), library HVAC reserve ($100,000), transfer station repairs ($45,000), zero-turn mower ($22,000). The town manager reduced the Board of Education capital request by $200,000, noting the district has a non-lapsing fund balance. The library project includes $700,000 in bonds, $700,000 in grants, and $500,000 in other funds. The town manager noted flexibility to shift bonding if grants fall short. Road paving funded at $800,000 total, with only $210,000 from taxpayer money (the rest from state grants). The town manager stressed that without fund balance, capital would need to be cut or taxes raised.
- Tax Impact: The reevaluation shifted tax burden from commercial to residential, with some homeowners seeing 20–25% increases. The manager provided a handout showing an average taxpayer with a $350,000 home would see a $414 annual increase. The Board of Tax Appeals has 200 applications, which may reduce the grand list. The mill rate is tentative until the final grand list is certified.
Key Outcomes
- No formal votes were taken. The workshop was for discussion and review.
- The town manager will bring a corrected CIP document (correcting the Conservation/Planning & Zoning entry).
- The council will continue budget discussions, with additional meetings scheduled (e.g., Thursday for other governmental departments).
- The council acknowledged the need to educate residents about the multi-year tax relief prior to this increase.
- The town manager will explore scheduling a special workshop during the summer to refine the multi-year capital plan.
Meeting Transcript
Good evening, everyone. Okay, I just have a few opening comments before we dive in. Um, I want to thank everyone for coming to this evening. Um, tonight marks another important step in the budget process as we begin back as we began it back in uh early January. Since that time, department heads have worked diligently to build the pages that fill your workbooks tonight. These documents are not abstract numbers, they are crafted by people who know their departments best, who understand the operational realities, the equipment and staffing, and the day-to-day demands required to maintain services for our residents and our businesses. Each request reflects what is necessary to sustain the level of service our community has come to expect. And where costs do increase, you will find detailed explanations identifying exactly why specific line items require adjustment. Transparency and clarity have guided this process from the beginning. If we look specifically at fiscal years 2021 through 2026, the spreadsheet before you, so you have some handouts which you may refer to, um, tells an important story. Following the last state mandated reevaluation, which occurs every five years, the cost of operating the town steadily increased, driven by contractual obligations, inflate inflation pressures, capital needs, and essential services. However, during that same time period, the tax levy did not increase accordingly. In fact, the town did not see a tax increase until fiscal year 2024-25, and even then it was minimal. To bridge the gap between rising operational costs and flat revenues, the town relied on the undesignated fund balance. While that may have provided short-term relief, it was neither sustainable or realistic. Repeated use of the fund balance to offset operating deficiencies or deficits created a growing structural void in our revenue stream, and now that gap is catching up with us. The overall proposed budget before you reflects a 3.4% increase. However, you will see that the current taxes increased by 7.5%. If the revenue mix had remained proportionate the same as the same as prior years, current taxes would have increased approximately 3.4%, roughly mirroring the overall budget increase. That difference is that the revenue mark makeup did not stay the same. Specifically, the use of fund balance has decreased by 1.6 a little over 1.6 million. Because we no longer relying on that level of one-time revenue to support ongoing operated expenses. Current taxes had to increase to make up that difference, which is why you see a 7.5 increase in current taxes. Reevaluation does not create additional revenue. It simply redistributes the tax burden proportionately based on updated property values. And due to re-evaluation, the mill rate has been reduced by 8.37 mills. Again, property values are not driving the mill rate. Service level levels and revenues needs are. It reflects creative consolidation where possible, realistic timelines for the useful life of town assets, capital improvements that are necessary now, and thoughtful preparation for those we know are that are coming in the near future. In front of you this evening, you also have additional handouts, as I mentioned. Some are duplicates of information that are in the budget book, but they are provided separately because they are easier to reference during the discussion. There is also graphs that visually break down the data to help illustrate trends, allocations, and overall composition of the budget. These visuals are intended to make the numbers more accessible and transparent as we move through each section. Tonight, Bob and I will walk you through each department. We have a department here, um department heads here this evening to answer any specific questions you may have. We will move deliberately and clearly so each of you and the public watching can understand how departmental needs directly support the expectations of our community. So we look forward to the discussion this evening, and we're gonna get started with our first department, which is our public um our building maintenance departments. So if you want to go to that section first, they should be in order, your tabs. So overall, this department went up 5.1%. The main driver is overtime. Um what we came to find is that previous years were not properly budgeted. Um so this department request um was reduced by about 20,000 uh requested 20,000. I reduced it by five with the expectation that the new full-time hired custodian who will be starting on March 16th will work Saturdays as part of his regular schedule. Currently, when we have events and there's Saturday activities, that's a full day of overtime for our custodians. So that was one of the um benefits of of making that position in last year's budget, which was approved full time. No, I think that's the best. No, I think let's go as as we go, and then we have Todd here who um also is in charge of building maintenance and and the custodians, so he could help you with that. Okay. This is okay. Which one's next?
openpublica.com