Vice Chair Moore.

I'm not vice chair.

I'm not vice chair.

Yeah, you are Martin is.

No, Tom.

I knew that.

I said no.

Vice Chair for right now.

Okay.

Commissioner Moore.

Here.

Commissioner Soule?

Here.

Commissioner Garza?

Here.

Chairperson Klein?

Here.

Vice Chair Martin.

All right.

You I'll have the agenda in front of you.

Do I have a motion for approval?

So move.

Mr.

Chairman.

Can we yeah, I can we remove under new business the request for approval of the replat?

Uh that that's it's not necessary.

And I I mean I we can leave it on there and I can explain, uh, but we don't need to take any action on that.

So we have nothing to talk about.

Uh you certainly can approve the minutes from the last meeting.

That'd be fantastic.

Thank you.

Yeah, I uh I made a motion to approve the agenda.

Um motion is the agenda's been changed uh struck in for this meeting, so I got a motion by Commissioner Moore.

Yeah.

Uh with three with the understanding that we're removing item number four new business request for approval of replat.

Yeah.

Second by Commissioner Sol.

Uh all those in favor.

Aye.

Aye.

Opposed.

All right.

The minutes from last time, has everybody had a chance to look at them.

Motion for approval as presented.

So move.

I got a uh motion by uh Commissioner Garza and a second by Commissioner Moore.

Uh uh Mr.

Hole, would you like to explain what I think?

Yes, certainly.

Thank you, Mr.

Chairman, members of the uh plan and zoning commit committee.

Um so if you look and I'm not sure which packet page that you have, but if you look at the aerial photograph uh that shows the properties along Tennessee Street, uh you'll notice that on the east side of Tennessee Street looking at the Curry County GIS database, they just show that as two tracks, but the plat itself is already broken up into blocks and lots.

And so uh when Mr.

Perkins looked at the GIS, uh he thought that it was just one large track.

And in order for them to sell that southern half, they would obviously need to subdivide it.

However, it has already been subdivided and it's part of the curry edition, a subdivision that actually dates back to I want to say like 1909, uh that time period when it's uh uh subdivided itself.

And so in order for them to sell the property, all they simply need to do is sell lots eight, nine, ten, and the south half of lot eleven, uh, because it has been subdivided already.

They actually, if you look at the legal description uh within the Curry County GIS database, it references the lots themselves and the block itself, and so there is no need to to take any further action to subdivide this.

And so uh when they do sell the property or they have sold the property from a legal description standpoint, they'll just list the lots that are already in place and don't need to create those two tracks.

All right, does anybody have anything else to go over?