Comprehensive Plan Amendment Meeting - Jan 20, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Meeting - January 20, 2026
The Board of Commissioners convened on Tuesday, January 20, 2026, for the first regularly scheduled zoning meeting of the year to review voluntary annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map. Commissioner Allen was absent due to illness. The meeting addressed six zoning decisions (ZD1–ZD6) requiring alignment with the existing plan and three staff-identified commission proposals (CP3-1, CP3-2, CP3-3) for District 3. Staff noted that while these annual updates have been a long-standing practice, the comprehensive process will undergo a major 10-year update in October 2027, during which the continuity of annual amendments will be re-evaluated.
Consent Calendar
- Motion to approve zoning decisions ZD1, ZD2, ZD4, ZD5, and ZD6, and deny ZD3. The motion passed unanimously (4-0).
- Motion to approve commission proposals CP3-1, CP3-2, and CP3-3. The motion passed unanimously (4-0).
Public Comments & Testimony
- No members of the public appeared to offer testimony on any agenda item during the public comment periods for the zoning decisions or commission proposals.
Discussion Items
- Zoning Decision ZD2 (Bells Ferry Road): Commissioner Gambrel questioned why a broader area was not reviewed for a clean delineation rather than changing a single parcel. Staff explained that involving the community for a broader area review is better suited for the large-scale 2027 update due to the timing and effort required. Commissioner Burrell confirmed that while the broader area could be addressed under commission proposals, individual parcel changes are not typical best practices for land use designations.
- Zoning Decisions ZD3 and ZD4: Commissioner Gambrel confirmed staff support for the denial of ZD3 (Industrial Compatible), aligning with the Planning Commission's recommendation. Regarding ZD4, Chairwoman noted that Commissioner Allen (absent) and Commissioner Bloing had recommended denial due to concerns about residential proximity to Dobbins, but with Allen absent and the Planning Commission representative also absent, the board proceeded with the vote.
- Commission Proposals (CP3): Commissioners Burrell and others clarified the context for the proposals in District 3: CP3-1 involves changing a church site (Public Institutional) developing into senior living (Low Density Residential), while CP3-2 involves changing a site (Low Density Residential) to a church (Public Institutional). CP3-3 also involves a change from Public Institutional to Low Density Residential.
- Future of Annual Updates: Staff recommended that while the 2027 Comprehensive Plan is being updated, the annual amendment process currently used may not be consistent with state law or regional practices and proposed that these annual updates might be discontinued after the current update cycle.
Key Outcomes
- Zoning Decisions Vote: The Board approved five requests (ZD1, ZD2, ZD4, ZD5, ZD6) and denied one (ZD3) by a vote of 4-0. ZD3 remains classified as Industrial Compatible.
- Commission Proposals Vote: The Board approved three property changes in District 3 (CP3-1, CP3-2, CP3-3) by a vote of 4-0.
- Next Steps: Staff will begin the large-scale 10-year Comprehensive Plan update due by October 31, 2027. The Board and staff will determine during community meetings whether to continue or discontinue the annual amendment process in the future.
Meeting Transcript
All right, good morning, everyone. Thank you for tuning in this Tuesday, January 20th, 2026. I hope everyone had an enjoyable Martin Luther King Day just yesterday. Today, at the first regularly scheduled zoning meeting that we would have at the beginning of the year, we actually have a comp plan amendment hearing. And I'm going to call up Philip Westbrook of Community Development to talk through what is occurring today. Thank you, Chairwoman. And good morning, ladies and gentlemen of the board, or ladies of the board today. Today, yes, Commissioner Allen is not feeling well. He will not be with us. This is a process that we have been doing for a while on an annual basis, but uh a little bit of background. The uh Georgia Planning Act of 1989 established comprehensive planning activities for each jurisdiction in the state. As part of those activities, it uh required that these jurisdictions create and maintain a comprehensive plan. Um the county has a comprehensive plan. In fact, uh we get we update it every five years, and we're actually getting ready to uh do a large-scale update uh that is due October 31st of 2027, and we have begun uh initiating that process, and uh I'm sure you'll hear a lot more about that throughout the year. But uh this is our annual amendment process. It is not it is a strictly a voluntary process, it is not required by state, it's not required by the code, and it's something that the county just has typically done. Um we have documents that go all the way back to the mid-90s uh of CPAs uh through this process. I believe a lot of it had to do with maybe uh the rapid growth going on in the 90s and so forth. So um, but again, here we are, annual amendment process. Uh the future land, or I'm sure should say the comprehensive plan and future land use, how it differs between zoning, the comprehensive plan is strictly a long-range planning document that guides growth and development. It is not a development ordinance, it is not zoning regulation, it is simply a guide and a tool that you as elected officials staff can use it to help make decisions on land uses and other county uh uh businesses uh help make decisions for the future of the county. So that's where that's how we how it relates. So you can just think of the the comprehensive plan as a guide, the zoning is a regulation. The zoning is an implementable tool of the comprehensive plan. So with that uh a little bit of background. Um I want to we have two different types of proposals. We have zone decisions and commission proposals. The zoning decisions are based off of zoning cases that were approved uh to a zoning district that were that was incompatible with the future land use. Um there and that those those zone zone decisions occurred through October 12-month period between October 2024 and October of 2025. Um again, they were they were cases that uh are incompatible with the future land use. The commission proposals typically are proposals that come from the commissioners. Ultimately, a lot of times they come from the community. Uh but this year, uh, just so happens that uh they really could be called staff proposals. Uh staff had just through our daily work uh throughout last year. We come across uh changes that need to be made to our future land use, and we mark them down, we note them, and we bring them uh forward uh for for change and amendment. And this year we have three commission proposals that staff identified that we felt like needed to be uh at least proposed, and also the commission proposals uh that those cases um the property owners of those uh properties were uh sent mail or sent a letter via mail as well as signs were erected in the area to notify the community of the proposed changes. Um okay, so now that we got a little that that little background, I think we can get into the process of the actual meeting. And I believe uh the chairwoman, if you would mind, I would kind of go through how we want to go through this process. It's a little different than our zoning, and um so what we'll do is I'll read off start with the zoning decisions. I'll read off each zoning decision case. After I read that case, you the chairwoman will ask the audience if there's anyone like to speak for or against. If they raise their hand, we'll set that case off to the side. If they don't, we'll continue moving forward after we read off all the zoning discussions decision cases. Uh you the board can vote on all the cases that did not have speakers and then come back and revisit the cases that did have speakers and vote on those individually. Once we move through that process, we'll do the same thing with the commission proposals. Sounds good to me. Just one slight modification will not slide to the board. Is after you ask for the public feedback, I'll also ask for commissioner feedback since they have the ability to have the matter heard as well. Excellent. Thank you.
openpublica.com