OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

AboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Colorado Springs, Colorado/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

City Planning Commission Meeting – August 12, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, August 12, 2026
BodyColorado Springs, Colorado
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, August 12, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:45:26

Transcript — VerbatimClick a line to jump · ⧉ to share it
2:58

Good morning.

3:46

Good morning.

3:47

If you all are here to speak on an item, please make sure you sign in at the table and indicate, put your name and indicate uh your position, whether it's your support or opposed of an item.

4:00

If you were here just to observe, you do not need to sign in.

4:04

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to come ask myself on Melissa or Solange at the table over here.

5:00

I'm going to call the Colorado Springs City Planning Commission public hearing for August 12th, 2026 to order.

5:06

The planning commission is comprised of nine members appointed by city council to review various development applications and proposals.

5:12

Planning commissioners are community volunteers with expertise across a wide variety of areas.

5:17

Each commissioner acts independently and carefully assesses all the information and evidence presented to make their decision.

5:24

City planning staff facilitates the process for applications.

5:32

Some applications require the planning commission to be the final decision authority, and for others, the planning commission is a recommendation body to the city council.

5:41

Throughout the hearing, we will require that everyone conduct themselves respectfully.

5:45

Understand others may have views different from your own.

5:50

Speaking out of order when not recognized, and using and the use of profanity will not be tolerated.

5:55

For items presented on today's agenda, the city planning staff will give a presentation on the application, followed by the applicant, who will have 30 minutes to present the details of the application.

6:06

For any items that are being heard on appeal today, the appellant and applicant will be given equal time.

6:11

Public comment will be taken after the presentations, starting with public comments in support of the application, followed by comments in opposition of the application.

6:22

Each citizen will have three minutes to speak, and please keep your comments brief and focused on the issues at hand and respect other attendees' rights to both be to both listen and be heard.

6:33

Once public comment is complete, the applicant will have a rebuttal period of 10 minutes to respond to and to respond to and address any comments.

6:40

And at the conclusion of the applicant's rebuttal, the discussion will move to the dais for commissioner consideration.

6:46

Solange, could you do our uh roll call, please?

6:52

Chair Hansler here.

6:54

Commissioner Robbins.

6:56

Here.

6:56

Commissioner Clements.

6:58

Here.

6:58

Commissioner Didiano.

7:01

Commissioner Willoughby.

7:03

Here.

7:04

Commissioner Case.

7:05

Here.

7:06

Commissioner Engel.

7:07

Here.

7:08

Commissioner Cecil.

7:09

Here.

7:10

Commissioner Egbert.

7:12

Here.

7:13

Thank you.

7:13

We have eight members person.

7:16

Great.

7:16

Thank you so much.

7:19

Do we have any changes to our agenda or postponements?

7:24

And looking at city staff and our commission.

7:27

I think not.

7:28

Okay.

7:29

Um.

7:33

Oh.

7:34

Who might be speaking?

7:36

Can we mute those online?

7:37

Or oh, it's the security with their okay.

7:41

Well, hopefully, nothing serious is happening.

7:45

Um, all right, moving on to communications.

7:48

Um, just a couple things from me.

7:50

I wanted to welcome Aaron Eggbert, our newest voting member to the commission.

7:53

So welcome.

7:54

We're excited to have you.

7:56

Um, I also wanted to say happy back to school for those of you that may also be parents.

8:01

Um, and remind us all to be really safe and careful in those school zones.

8:05

Please go 20 miles per hour.

8:07

Uh I think those are the only things I wanted to say.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use and Zoning█████████████████████████████████████████████58%
Procedural████████████15%
Historic Preservation████████10%
Community Engagement██████8%
Parking Management██2%
Traffic Engineering██2%
Public Engagement█1%
Affordable Housing█1%
Environmental Protection█1%
Summary of Proceedings

City Planning Commission Meeting – August 12, 2026

The Colorado Springs City Planning Commission met on Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at 9:00 AM in Hearing Room at 2880 International Circle. Eight of nine commissioners were present (Commissioner Gigiano absent for morning items, later joined online). The meeting covered three quasi-judicial items: one consent calendar item, a development standards adjustment called off consent, an unfinished business parking variance, and a new business use variance. All items were approved, with two votes of 8-1 and one 8-0-1.

Consent Calendar

  • 5.A – Sugarbowl Grove Street Name Change (SUBD-26-0049): Approved unanimously as part of the consent calendar after item 5.B was pulled for separate hearing.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • 501 N Wahsatch Ave – Development Standards Adjustment: Four public comments were received via postcard (255 mailed per round). Concerns included preference for commercial return, short-term rental fears, property neglect, and parking. One supporter hoped for building activation. In person, Robert duPignac (neighborhood homeowner) opposed, citing parking strain, school-zone traffic, and historic character. Zachary Gates criticized planning and neglected appearance. Jillie Johnston (new resident) expressed support but asked about historic preservation and density math. Applicant rebutted that density figure (13.33 DU/acre) is a mathematical necessity for three existing units, no new units, and parking meets code.
  • La Kitchen Parking Variance (2001 W Colorado Ave): Two public comments, both opposed. Robert Bronte (adjacent property owner) feared employees and customers would overwhelm street parking and his private lot. He argued the location is poorly suited for commercial parking.
  • Woodmen Valley Chapel Coffee Shop Use Variance (16 E Platte Ave): No public comments received.

Discussion Items

  • 5.B – 501 N Wahsatch Ave Development Standards Adjustment: Applicant Bill Guman (William Guman & Associates) requested allowing 13.33 DU/acre where 8 is allowed to convert a former laundromat and two residential units into three single-family homes on a 9,800 sq ft lot (R-4 zone). Staff Ethan Shafer explained the commercial use lost legal nonconforming status; conversion triggers density calculation. Commissioners debated math (13.33 vs 13.34) and parking adequacy (6 spaces provided). Commissioner Cecil noted 13.33 yields ~2.93 units/acre but accepted 13.34. Chair Hensler clarified math is moot as no units are added. Commissioner Willoughby noted conversion reduces parking demand vs commercial. Commissioner Case inquired about short-term rental eligibility; staff confirmed the property likely would not qualify. The motion to approve passed 8-0-1.
  • 7.A – La Kitchen Parking Variance (NVAR-26-005): Applicants Ben Guzman and Angela Wood sought to convert a historic 1901 home into a café, requiring only 1 off-street parking space (ADA) where 7 are normally required for a restaurant. Staff Bill Gray noted the 3,600 sq ft lot is an exceptional physical condition. Public concerns from Robert Bronte about parking spillover. Applicants negotiated with Sacred Heart Church for employee parking; staff noted they could not post signs on others' property. Commissioners discussed outdoor seating limit (20% of indoor seating) and future development plan review. Motion by Commissioner Willoughby, seconded by Commissioner Clements, to approve with condition that outdoor seating not exceed 20% of indoor seating. Passed 8-1 (Commissioner Engel opposed).
  • 8.A – Woodmen Valley Chapel Coffee Shop Use Variance (UVAR-26-004): Ethan Shafer presented the request to allow a 1,600 sq ft coffee shop (Hold Fast Coffee) as a second principal use in an R-5 zone. The church cannot use accessory use because the public-facing storefront makes it a principal use. Applicant Mike Malin (CFO) and Grace Harrison (Hold Fast owner) described the ministry model and community benefit. No public comment. Commissioner Cecil expressed concern that the use variance criteria were not fully met (no exceptional hardship, other beneficial uses exist). Chair Hensler countered that a rezoning would create broader commercial entitlements. Motion to recommend approval to City Council passed 8-1 (Commissioner Cecil opposed).

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Calendar: Item 5.A (Sugarbowl Grove street name change) approved unanimously.
  • 501 N Wahsatch Ave Development Standards Adjustment (DVSA-25-003): Approved 8-0-1 (Commissioner Gigiano absent). Density increased from 8 to 13.34 DU/acre to allow three existing residential units. Condition: none.
  • La Kitchen Parking Variance (NVAR-26-005): Approved 8-1 (Commissioner Engel dissenting). Condition: outdoor seating ≤20% of indoor seating.
  • Woodmen Valley Chapel Coffee Shop Use Variance (UVAR-26-004): Recommended to City Council for approval by vote of 8-1 (Commissioner Cecil dissenting). No conditions. Appeal deadline: August 24, 2026.
  • Next Steps: Woodmen Valley Chapel item will go to City Council. All other decisions are final unless appealed within 10 days.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning. Good morning. If you all are here to speak on an item, please make sure you sign in at the table and indicate, put your name and indicate uh your position, whether it's your support or opposed of an item. If you were here just to observe, you do not need to sign in. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to come ask myself on Melissa or Solange at the table over here. I'm going to call the Colorado Springs City Planning Commission public hearing for August 12th, 2026 to order. The planning commission is comprised of nine members appointed by city council to review various development applications and proposals. Planning commissioners are community volunteers with expertise across a wide variety of areas. Each commissioner acts independently and carefully assesses all the information and evidence presented to make their decision. City planning staff facilitates the process for applications. Some applications require the planning commission to be the final decision authority, and for others, the planning commission is a recommendation body to the city council. Throughout the hearing, we will require that everyone conduct themselves respectfully. Understand others may have views different from your own. Speaking out of order when not recognized, and using and the use of profanity will not be tolerated. For items presented on today's agenda, the city planning staff will give a presentation on the application, followed by the applicant, who will have 30 minutes to present the details of the application. For any items that are being heard on appeal today, the appellant and applicant will be given equal time. Public comment will be taken after the presentations, starting with public comments in support of the application, followed by comments in opposition of the application. Each citizen will have three minutes to speak, and please keep your comments brief and focused on the issues at hand and respect other attendees' rights to both be to both listen and be heard. Once public comment is complete, the applicant will have a rebuttal period of 10 minutes to respond to and to respond to and address any comments. And at the conclusion of the applicant's rebuttal, the discussion will move to the dais for commissioner consideration. Solange, could you do our uh roll call, please? Chair Hansler here. Commissioner Robbins. Here. Commissioner Clements. Here. Commissioner Didiano. Commissioner Willoughby. Here. Commissioner Case. Here. Commissioner Engel. Here. Commissioner Cecil. Here. Commissioner Egbert. Here. Thank you. We have eight members person. Great. Thank you so much. Do we have any changes to our agenda or postponements? And looking at city staff and our commission. I think not. Okay. Um. Oh. Who might be speaking? Can we mute those online? Or oh, it's the security with their okay.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com