OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Columbia, Missouri/Video Archive
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Summary (Nov 6, 2025)

Video Archive — Thursday, November 6, 2025
BodyColumbia, Missouri
SessionVideo Archive
DateThursday, November 6, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:23:40

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:06

Good evening.

0:07

I will now call the November 6, 2025 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission to order.

0:15

Commissioner Brodsky, may we please have a roll call?

0:18

Commissioner Ortiz.

0:20

Here.

0:20

Commissioner Stanton.

0:22

Mayor.

0:23

Commissioner Stockton is absent.

0:25

Commissioner Walters.

0:27

Here.

0:27

Commissioner Wilson?

0:29

Here.

0:30

I am here.

0:31

Commissioner Darr.

0:32

Here.

0:33

Commissioner Goway Jones.

0:35

Here.

0:36

Commissioner Gray is absent.

0:37

We have a quorum of seven.

0:40

Thank you.

0:41

Are there any changes to our agenda this evening?

0:44

No, ma'am, there are not.

0:45

Thank you.

0:46

Are there any um motions to approve the agenda?

0:49

I'll move to approve the agenda.

0:51

Second.

0:51

Moved by Commissioner Stanton, seconded by Commissioner Ortiz thumbs-up approval of the agenda.

0:57

Unanimous.

0:58

Thank you.

0:59

We all received a copy of the October 23rd, 2025 regular meeting minutes.

1:04

Are there any changes or adjustments to the minutes?

1:07

Seeing none.

1:08

Is there a motion to approve?

1:09

I moved to approve the agenda.

1:11

Second.

1:13

Minutes.

1:14

I'm sorry.

1:14

Minutes.

1:15

Thank you, yes.

1:16

A second as amended.

1:18

Thank you.

1:19

Moved by Commissioner Stanton.

1:21

Seconded by Commissioner Ortiz.

1:25

Thumbs up approval of the minutes.

1:27

Unanimous with Commissioner Wilson abstaining because of her absence at our last meeting.

1:34

Wonderful.

1:35

First case for the evening, case number 331-2025.

1:39

A request by Kevin Frank agent on behalf of Tiger Game Day Escape LLC owner to allow 1906 Grant Lane to be used as a 210-night maximum seven guest short-term rental, STR, pursuant to Section 29-3.3 V V and Section 29-6.4M2 of the Unified Development Code.

1:56

The three-bedroom three-bath home has a two-car attached garage and driveway with sufficient capacity to support for UDC compliant on-site off-street parking spaces.

2:06

The point four five acre subject site is located on the east side of Grant Lane, approximately 165 feet south of Chapel Hill Road.

2:13

May we please have a staff report?

2:15

Yes, you may, Madam Chair.

2:16

Thank you for that introduction.

2:21

Followed by uh 24 public hearing letters to tenants and property owners on which is 24 of those on October 20th, and an ad rant in the Tribune on October 21st.

2:31

Here is a overview or over aerial photography of the subject site highlighted in red there.

2:38

This is south of the intersection of Chapel Hill Drive and Grant Lane.

2:42

Here is a street view of the subject property with the highlighted driveway with the two UDC compliant parking spaces highlighted there.

2:49

Um this property is zoned R1 and is not the primary residence of the applicant.

2:53

Uh as mentioned, it was a three-bedroom, three-bathroom home, which per the IPMC would be seven.

2:58

One of the bedrooms is a little bit larger than the other two, which is how they get the uh one extra guest in there.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Short Term Rental Regulation███████████████████████████████31%
Short Term Rentals████████████████████████████28%
Floodplain Management██████████10%
Public Engagement████████8%
Zoning████████8%
Community Engagement███████7%
Procedural███3%
Stormwater Management██2%
Public Safety█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting - November 6, 2025

The Planning and Zoning Commission convened on November 6, 2025, to address three rezoning requests and several short-term rental (STR) conditional use permits. While five STR applications were approved, one was denied due to a history of violations and communication failures. A major rezoning project to transition property to multifamily use was also approved following clarifications on floodplain regulations.

Consent Calendar

  • October 23, 2025 Minutes: Approved unanimously, with Commissioner Wilson abstaining due to her absence at the prior meeting.
  • November 6, 2025 Agenda: Approved unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

Case 331-2025 (1906 Grant Lane)

  • Applicant (Kevin Frank): Expressed full support for their business model as responsible neighbors, citing $35,000 in exterior improvements, a designated 24/7 agent, ring cameras, and a policy against one-night stays. They stated they reached out to neighbors and held a meet-and-greet.
  • Tammy Jones (Neighbor): Expressed strong opposition, arguing the property is inconsistent with the R1 neighborhood character and that review ratings cannot guarantee guest behavior. She stated the proposal fails specific criteria regarding neighborhood character and potential adverse impacts.
  • Janice Dawson Threat (Neighbor): Expressed fear and opposition due to past experiences with absentee landlords and unresponsive renters. She stated she feels she has no control over noise and property maintenance and fears her property value will decline.
  • Deborah Bernhardt (Neighbor): Expressed opposition regarding the removal of homes from the permanent housing market for corporate short-term rentals. She suggested the city should look at commercial lodging alternatives instead.

Case 332-2025 (3408 Eastham Drive)

  • Applicants (Mamara Tala & Hannah Shadea): Expressed remorse regarding past violations but stated they are committed to being good neighbors with a dedicated management team. They explained missed notices were due to mail handling errors and confirmed they have hired a professional manager and addressed all maintenance issues.
  • Pat Devine (Neighbor): Expressed strong opposition, citing ignored violation notices, an illegal operation history, and the proximity to another existing STR. He stated the applicants are not acting in good faith.
  • Joe Moscato (Neighbor): Expressed concern regarding the proximity to a synagogue playground and the potential for noisy parties affecting children.

Case 337-2025 (1603 Woodmore Court)

  • Applicant (Frank Lewis): Expressed full commitment to community integration, stating they visited every neighbor personally before purchasing and that the property is an extension of their family home. They stated they employ a local agent and have a plan to address any issues immediately.

Case 338-2025 (717 Campus View Drive)

  • Applicant (Stacey Mattingley): Expressed full support for their business practices, citing their full-time role as a property manager, use of decibel monitors (NoiseAware), and direct communication with neighbors. She stated she personally screened all guests and rejected party-seekers.

Case 04-2026 (302 North 9th Street)

  • Applicant (Devin Kelly): Expressed regret for delaying the application until receiving a violation notice, admitting it was a cash-flow tactic to fund necessary driveway construction. He stated he was transparent about the illegal operation, has a long-term rental license, and is actively working to install compliant parking.
  • Cara Kelly (Applicant/Spouse): Expressed support for the project as a creative outlet and affordable lodging option for visitors. She stated they take their role seriously and strive to improve the neighborhood.

Discussion Items

  • Case 331-2025 (Tiger Game Day Escape LLC): Staff supported approval, noting no prior violations on the property and sufficient parking. Commissioners debated the definition of "good neighbor" practices versus regulatory compliance.
  • Case 332-2025 (Mamaratala): Significant debate occurred regarding the applicants' history of three code violations (lawn care, parking, and illegal STR operation) and their response to violation letters. Commissioners noted that the applicants had failed to respond to previous notices, raising concerns about their management ecosystem. Commissioner Brodsky and Commissioner Darr specifically questioned the reliability of the applicants' communication channels.
  • Case 335-2025 (Broad Park LLC - Rezoning): Staff recommended rezoning 73.75 acres from Planned Development (PD) to RMF (Multifamily) to reduce administrative burdens. Commissioners and the applicant's engineer clarified floodplain distinctions, confirming that while the property contains floodways (no-build zones) and floodplains (buildable with permits and fill), the proposed development avoids fill in the floodway and complies with elevation requirements. Concerns about downstream flooding and traffic were addressed by engineers who assured no significant negative impact.

Key Outcomes

  • Case 331-2025: Approved (7-0). The request for a conditional use permit for 1906 Grant Lane was approved subject to a maximum occupancy of 7 guests, a 210-night annual limit, and availability of the two-car garage for parking.
  • Case 332-2025: Denied (4-3). The request for a conditional use permit for 3408 Eastham Drive was denied. The vote was split, with Commissioners Brodsky, Darr, Walters, and Wilson voting "No" due to the history of violations and lack of proactive compliance, while Commissioners Stanton, Ortiz, and Goway Jones voted "Yes" to give the applicants a second chance.
  • Case 335-2025: Approved (7-0). The request to rezone 73.75 acres from Planned Development to RMF was approved. The motion carries, subject to standard UDC compliance for any future development.
  • Case 337-2025: Approved (7-0). The request for a conditional use permit for 1603 Woodmore Court was approved subject to a maximum occupancy of 8 guests, a 210-night annual limit, and the use of the two-car garage for parking.
  • Case 338-2025: Approved (7-0). The request for a conditional use permit for 717 Campus View Drive was approved subject to a maximum occupancy of 7 guests, a 210-night annual limit, and the use of the two-car garage for parking.
  • Case 04-2026: Approved (7-0). The request for a conditional use permit for 302 North 9th Street was approved. The approval is contingent upon the applicant installing UDC-compliant parking spaces (supporting two vehicles) prior to the issuance of a certificate of compliance or business license.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. I will now call the November 6, 2025 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission to order. Commissioner Brodsky, may we please have a roll call? Commissioner Ortiz. Here. Commissioner Stanton. Mayor. Commissioner Stockton is absent. Commissioner Walters. Here. Commissioner Wilson? Here. I am here. Commissioner Darr. Here. Commissioner Goway Jones. Here. Commissioner Gray is absent. We have a quorum of seven. Thank you. Are there any changes to our agenda this evening? No, ma'am, there are not. Thank you. Are there any um motions to approve the agenda? I'll move to approve the agenda. Second. Moved by Commissioner Stanton, seconded by Commissioner Ortiz thumbs-up approval of the agenda. Unanimous. Thank you. We all received a copy of the October 23rd, 2025 regular meeting minutes. Are there any changes or adjustments to the minutes? Seeing none. Is there a motion to approve? I moved to approve the agenda. Second. Minutes. I'm sorry. Minutes. Thank you, yes. A second as amended. Thank you. Moved by Commissioner Stanton. Seconded by Commissioner Ortiz. Thumbs up approval of the minutes. Unanimous with Commissioner Wilson abstaining because of her absence at our last meeting. Wonderful. First case for the evening, case number 331-2025. A request by Kevin Frank agent on behalf of Tiger Game Day Escape LLC owner to allow 1906 Grant Lane to be used as a 210-night maximum seven guest short-term rental, STR, pursuant to Section 29-3.3 V V and Section 29-6.4M2 of the Unified Development Code. The three-bedroom three-bath home has a two-car attached garage and driveway with sufficient capacity to support for UDC compliant on-site off-street parking spaces. The point four five acre subject site is located on the east side of Grant Lane, approximately 165 feet south of Chapel Hill Road.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com