OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Columbia City Council Pre-Council Meeting Summary - Jan 20, 2026

Video ArchiveWednesday, January 21, 2026
BodyColumbia, Missouri
SessionVideo Archive
DateWednesday, January 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:32:34

Transcript — Verbatim
0:04

We're gonna go ahead and call our January 20th, 2026 Columbia City Council's pre-council to order.

0:12

We have a few things on tonight's agenda.

0:14

Up for up first is four presentations from our labor group presentations, and then we'll get into the community survey results.

0:21

I'll make note that often we um usually try to have time to go to closed session because of the timing this year.

0:27

Um most likely we do uh require any closed session for the labor group presentation, it'll be at the February 2nd uh pre-council, which that will happen.

0:35

So make sure when asking questions to my council or for council members to staff that we make sure not to violate any sort of personnel rules, and I'll look to you, Kathy, to tell us if we're going into that that space.

0:45

Um all right, so Kathy Baker, I'm gonna turn this over to you, and you will tell us who is presenting and when.

0:50

That's good.

0:51

Good evening, uh council and mayor.

0:53

We as you said we have four of our five labor groups that have asked yes in a microphone, or is it too hard?

0:58

No, it's not hard.

0:59

I think we have to all right.

1:05

As the mayor indicated, we have four of our five labor groups that have asked to present tonight.

1:10

Our first group is local 955, and they're gonna be um represented by Scotty Johnson.

1:21

I'm gonna keep it pretty short and sweet.

1:24

You can pick it up, Eric.

1:25

You can take it out of the stand, all the things.

1:27

Right.

1:28

You have to hold this really close to your mouth.

1:30

I'm keeping it pretty short and sweet today.

1:32

Um we don't have a slideshow.

1:35

Um I've got papers here.

1:37

Do you want to look at some down?

1:41

Thank you.

1:42

Um we're seeking pay grade adjustments for union eligible positions, including the two transit water distribution workers, implementing a $19 an hour minimum wage for representative positions.

1:55

Uh attendance policy revisions.

1:57

We found that in uh several different departments that they're vastly different attendance policies.

2:04

So we'd like to have some more uniform.

2:07

Uh cost living adjustments to the step scales, extension of the step scale to the maximum of the biggest.

2:13

Um adjustments to policies relating to DOT F and CSA compliance physicals and drug testings.

2:21

Uh cost living adjustments to holiday pay, stamina pay, all other ad phase and allowances.

2:27

And we'd like to get finding arbitration to discipline procedures and overall agreements procedure.

2:37

Anyone have any questions for Scotty?

2:39

Yeah, Nick, uh, use microphone, please.

2:42

Oh, thank you.

2:43

Uh hey Scotty, thanks.

2:45

Uh that's short and sweet.

2:46

Not a lot of specificity here, but I'm wondering if there's more specificity in your conversations with uh city admin.

2:54

We will, yeah, we will get into more specific uh details in pretty negotiations.

2:59

Um I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about the um attendance policies and what it looks like when it's different across divisions.

3:15

Yeah, so um what we found is that there are some divisions that you know they don't really need discipline.

3:24

They as far as attendance goes, they uh there's really no some we haven't found a policy in some divisions, but then other divisions like transit we found that they've got very strict policies and are getting discipline more often for attending visualizing whatnot.

3:42

So we like to make it more uniform so we all have a fair policy.

3:49

Other questions first.

3:51

Um I have to have one remind us this year.

3:54

Is it um is it wave adjustments and then any open-ended items?

3:59

What is in this year's?

4:02

Okay, all right.

4:03

And are these items currently on your or all within your open-ended items?

4:07

Uh yes.

4:10

Yeah.

4:12

All right, well, thanks, guys.

4:14

Thank you.

4:15

You can just hand that to cats if you want.

4:28

Okay, our next group is local 1055, and Zach Clivet is here to present.

4:34

I think that got you set up right.

4:36

All right.

4:38

I hate holding a microphone talk, uh, but I'll do my best.

4:42

Thank you.

4:42

Um I guess I should also warn you all that there's a camera too, because you don't want to put your butt towards it.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Personnel Matters█████████████████████████████29%
Community Engagement█████████████████████21%
Public Engagement███████████████████19%
Public Safety███████████11%
Procedural████████8%
Homelessness█████5%
Public Works███3%
Code Enforcement██2%
Transportation██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Columbia City Council Pre-Council Meeting - January 20, 2026

The Columbia City Council convened a pre-council meeting to receive presentations from four of the city's five labor negotiators regarding their bargaining priorities for the upcoming contract year, followed by a detailed review of the 2025 Community Survey results and staff responses. While the majority of meetings proceed to closed session for labor negotiations, the Mayor indicated that a closed session will likely be scheduled for the February 2nd pre-council to avoid personnel rule violations during the open presentations. The meeting concluded with discussions on tabling specific reports for the February 16th meeting and inquiries regarding transportation data in the survey.

Consent Calendar

  • No specific consent calendar items were debated or voted upon during this pre-council session; the agenda focused on presentations and discussion.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments were solicited or recorded during this specific pre-council segment; the session was dedicated to labor group presentations and staff analysis.

Discussion Items

  • Labor Group Presentations:

    • Local 955 (Scotty Johnson): Expressed a clear desire for pay grade adjustments for union-eligible positions (including transit and water distribution workers), a $19/hour minimum wage for representatives, uniform attendance policies across departments, cost-of-living adjustments to step scales and holiday pay, and revised arbitration/discipline procedures. The speaker noted that specific details are reserved for formal negotiations.
    • Local 1055 (Zach Clivet): Stated full satisfaction with recent pay plan adjustments but argued that current compensation has fallen behind inflation, with members earning less in real terms than six years ago. Expressed strong support for step adjustments tied to economic conditions, increased ad-hoc pay for specialized teams (Hazmat, water rescue), and an automatic inflation-tied adjustment for meal allowances. Speaker proposed a post-employment health insurance HSA-style savings program funded by sick leave buybacks and advocated for a net-zero approach to be surpassed by actual growth.
    • CPLA (Derek Morris): Highlighted three primary goals: addressing recruitment and retention by aligning compensation (noting sergeants often earn more than lieutenants due to overtime), removing vacation accrual limits for better leave flexibility, and securing retirement benefits including service credit purchase options and post-employment health care. Expressed support for standardized leadership training and clarified that current job descriptions are often outdated or undermined by higher command staff taking over responsibilities.
    • Columbia Police Officers Association (Don Neavers): Emphasized the critical need for retention, noting the loss of 14 officers (nearly 10% of the sworn workforce) in the last 90 days. Proposed a pay step plan rewarding tenure and CPI-based adjustments, restoration of the 20-year retirement option, and bargaining for binding arbitration of discipline decisions to ensure neutral reviews. Speaker argued that the current Citizen Police Review Board lacks sufficient rules to prevent bias and requested collaborative brainstorming to improve the investigation and appeal process.
    • Water and Waste Association: The only labor group not requesting to present; the group is not listed on the agenda for this session.
  • 2025 Community Survey Results (Robert Heacot, ETC Institute):

    • Presented data showing that 80 of 89 measured metrics remained the same or improved, with only 9 decreasing slightly. Expressed strong support among the data for the city's direction, noting a 14.3% improvement in police department quality satisfaction in just one year.
    • Clarified methodology: The survey utilized a random, address-based sample (804 responses, 95% confidence, ±3.4% margin of error). Approximately 20 responses from social media ads and 20 from outside city limits were excluded. Respondents indicating "do not know" were filtered out of satisfaction benchmarks but included in the raw data report.
    • Key findings: Residents ranked "quality of police and fire services" and "increased number of police" as top priorities. Dissatisfaction remains high regarding crime prevention efforts (51% dissatisfied), though this metric improved 12% from the previous year. Public works satisfaction is mixed, with low scores for street maintenance and sidewalk conditions. Residents identified "transparency and accountability" as the top factor for trusting local government.
    • Noted that 69% of respondents believe the city does not have enough police officers and firefighters.
  • Staff Presentation (Carol Rhodes and Department Heads):

    • Outlined ongoing efforts to address survey concerns, including expanded homeless warming/cooling sites, a new "Right Home" program, and increased homelessness outreach officers.
    • Reported recruitment of 39 police and 33 fire officers in 2025, with a 67% increase in traffic stops (from 3,000 to 18,000) and the implementation of license plate readers and Axon cameras. Stated plans to reinstate the downtown unit and enhance park safety.
    • Addressed street maintenance costs, noting MODOT's reduced maintenance role due to resource constraints, and clarified that sidewalk maintenance is primarily the responsibility of property owners, though a 50-50 cost-share program exists.
    • Confirmed that recommendations will directly influence the Fiscal Year 27 budget formulation, particularly regarding staffing for litter control and park maintenance.

Key Outcomes

  • Agenda Adjustment: Council agreed to table the "Communications for Capital Improvement Projects" and "Mayor's Task Force Feedback (2014)" reports to the February 16th meeting to ensure time availability.
  • Closed Session Planning: Council directed staff to add a closed session item regarding labor negotiations to the February 2nd agenda, with a request to potentially meet 30 minutes early (4:30 PM) to accommodate the discussion.
  • Data Follow-Up: Council requested a review of the raw survey data to confirm whether the excluded 40 respondents (social media/outside city) contributed to the open text comments section.
  • Transportation Inquiry: A council member requested ETC Institute be contacted to see if transportation comparisons to the Plains region (currently missing from the summary slides) can be included in future reports or the contract.
  • Methodology Verification: Council requested that the final report be corrected to fix a formatting error on page 11 where "tire" was printed instead of "fire." The surveyors confirmed this was an error in the draft and will issue a revised report.

Meeting Transcript

We're gonna go ahead and call our January 20th, 2026 Columbia City Council's pre-council to order. We have a few things on tonight's agenda. Up for up first is four presentations from our labor group presentations, and then we'll get into the community survey results. I'll make note that often we um usually try to have time to go to closed session because of the timing this year. Um most likely we do uh require any closed session for the labor group presentation, it'll be at the February 2nd uh pre-council, which that will happen. So make sure when asking questions to my council or for council members to staff that we make sure not to violate any sort of personnel rules, and I'll look to you, Kathy, to tell us if we're going into that that space. Um all right, so Kathy Baker, I'm gonna turn this over to you, and you will tell us who is presenting and when. That's good. Good evening, uh council and mayor. We as you said we have four of our five labor groups that have asked yes in a microphone, or is it too hard? No, it's not hard. I think we have to all right. As the mayor indicated, we have four of our five labor groups that have asked to present tonight. Our first group is local 955, and they're gonna be um represented by Scotty Johnson. I'm gonna keep it pretty short and sweet. You can pick it up, Eric. You can take it out of the stand, all the things. Right. You have to hold this really close to your mouth. I'm keeping it pretty short and sweet today. Um we don't have a slideshow. Um I've got papers here. Do you want to look at some down? Thank you. Um we're seeking pay grade adjustments for union eligible positions, including the two transit water distribution workers, implementing a $19 an hour minimum wage for representative positions. Uh attendance policy revisions. We found that in uh several different departments that they're vastly different attendance policies. So we'd like to have some more uniform. Uh cost living adjustments to the step scales, extension of the step scale to the maximum of the biggest. Um adjustments to policies relating to DOT F and CSA compliance physicals and drug testings. Uh cost living adjustments to holiday pay, stamina pay, all other ad phase and allowances. And we'd like to get finding arbitration to discipline procedures and overall agreements procedure. Anyone have any questions for Scotty? Yeah, Nick, uh, use microphone, please. Oh, thank you. Uh hey Scotty, thanks. Uh that's short and sweet. Not a lot of specificity here, but I'm wondering if there's more specificity in your conversations with uh city admin. We will, yeah, we will get into more specific uh details in pretty negotiations. Um I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about the um attendance policies and what it looks like when it's different across divisions. Yeah, so um what we found is that there are some divisions that you know they don't really need discipline. They as far as attendance goes, they uh there's really no some we haven't found a policy in some divisions, but then other divisions like transit we found that they've got very strict policies and are getting discipline more often for attending visualizing whatnot. So we like to make it more uniform so we all have a fair policy. Other questions first. Um I have to have one remind us this year. Is it um is it wave adjustments and then any open-ended items? What is in this year's? Okay, all right. And are these items currently on your or all within your open-ended items? Uh yes.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com