OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Cook County Domestic Violence Task Force Meeting - May 6, 2026

Board of CommissionersWednesday, May 6, 2026
BodyCook County, Illinois
SessionBoard of Commissioners
DateWednesday, May 6, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:57:47

Transcript — Verbatim
1:20

Yeah.

13:21

Thank you all for being here this morning.

13:23

Um, do we have any registered public speakers?

13:28

Yes.

13:30

Members of the public who wish to testify have until twenty-four hours before the schedule start at the meeting to register in order to do so.

13:37

Speakers will have three minutes to address the task force and will be alerted when they have one minute time remaining, one thirty seconds remain, and when the time has expired.

15:00

Tomorrow, I am bringing that legislation that you started to the city of County Met City.

15:06

Um domestic violence in the County Met City is rampant throughout the Southland.

15:13

The numbers are increasing.

15:15

Um legislation was started in Cook County and it was championed and partnered in City of Chicago.

15:24

We are hardest hit in the Southland, and sometimes it seems like we are overlooked.

15:30

Um and our courthouses out in the Southland are some of the worst throughout the county.

15:41

Um Marshall Courthouse does not have access or the funding that is needed to support domestic violence victims.

15:52

Um, oftentimes just trying to enter the building and maneuver and navigate the system, re-triggers and re-victimizes the victim.

16:02

Um, I wanted to thank you because in County Met City, we are going to tomorrow evening uh put forth similar legislation that you drafted to support the residents, employees, elected officials, and all those that walk through Calumet City, and we would like to partner more with City of Chicago and Cook County for domestic violence uh protection and support.

16:29

Thank you.

16:30

Thank you.

16:31

Thank you so much.

16:32

Next up is Sarah Brown.

16:48

Good morning.

16:49

Go ahead.

16:50

Good morning, everyone.

16:52

Uh, my name is Sarah Brown.

16:54

Uh I am a resident of the Southland region.

16:58

Uh I am here today to express my concerns regarding the ongoing challenges faced by family navigating the domestic relations court system.

17:09

I'm currently involved in a domestic relations case that has been pending for a little bit over nine and a half years.

17:16

Uh, this case was originally heard in the Bridgeview Courthouse, which was accessible to my community.

17:28

Um, I now find myself traveling over an hour uh to attend hearings, which places an enormous burden not only on me, but also my family who relies on me.

17:41

I would like to bring to your attention Illinois statutes related to appointment and compensation of GAL and child representatives according to 750 ILCS 5506 and 750 ILCS506.6.

18:00

This is our Illinois statute that the court has the authority to appoint GAL and child representatives to ensure the best interest of children that are upheld in domestic relations cases.

18:14

While I appreciate the need for such services, the implementation has become increasingly problematic.

18:21

Moreover, I like to remind you of the statute that determines the hourly rates that's set that's set by judges for these representatives.

18:30

The expectations for families to bear the cost of representation along with burdens of lengthy travel, adds unnecessary strain during an already challenging time.

18:42

It is vital that we prioritize accessibility within domestic relations system when families should not have to endure significant tribal hardships that could deter them from seeking the justice they deserve.

18:54

I urge all bodies to consider these issues seriously and it's for solutions that would make the processes more efficient and humane for all involved.

19:04

Thank you.

19:05

Thank you so much.

19:06

Next is Diane Brown.

19:23

Good morning, everyone.

19:24

Good morning.

19:34

And uh regarding domestic violence and the task force that was put together regarding domestic violence.

19:44

I'm a mother, I'm a grandmother, I'm a great-grandmother.

19:48

And uh going to court with my daughter Sarah when I retired January uh 2024.

20:00

It was an urgency uh because of a case that was uh in court for seven years, now it's nine.

20:07

And um to see the courtroom now when I was in the in the courtrooms in the 80s is totally different, but I still believe in democracy.

20:19

I believe in the court system, I believe in uh the city of Chicago, Cook County.

20:27

Uh those who are in office now, I voted for all of you all.

20:32

Domestic violence isn't going away, it's not and it affects and people that are meeting along this journey.

20:41

Um there should be accountability with GALs, believe it or not in the courtroom behind the judge, it has in God we trust.

20:53

My faith was shaken, pretending that I was a homeless person wearing the same thing the court with my daughter 2024, 2025 to see because each year she would tell me that she's gone through another judge and all of that.

21:13

I couldn't believe it because I trust in the circuit court, the county, city of Chicago, but there is a problem, it's a broken literally, and some people like myself at one time.

21:30

I I didn't believe that it was broken, it's broken, and we have to do something.

21:37

We have to produce the data.

21:40

We have to produce it.

21:41

We have to have evaluations for GALs.

21:45

There are complaints, and we should see those complaints.

21:50

There should be judicial training and oversight.

21:54

It has to.

21:54

We can't just leave it here.

21:57

We can't just leave it here because my grandson is traumatized, and other people also.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Legal Access████████████████████████████████████36%
Domestic Violence███████████████████████████████████35%
Procedural████████████████16%
Victim Services████4%
Fiscal Sustainability███3%
Criminal Justice██2%
Mental Health Awareness██2%
Public Health1%
Public Safety1%
Summary of Proceedings

Cook County Domestic Violence Task Force Meeting - May 6, 2026

The Cook County Domestic Violence Task Force met on May 6, 2026, at 9:45 AM. The meeting featured presentations on the role of guardians ad litem (GALs), child representatives, and attorneys for children in domestic relations cases, as well as an update from the Governor State University Legal Clinic. Public testimony highlighted ongoing challenges in the Southland region, including access to justice, financial burdens, and systemic coordination failures.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Calumet City representative: Thanked the task force for legislation addressing domestic violence, noting that the Southland is "hardest hit" and often overlooked. Mentioned that funding and access at the Marshall Courthouse are insufficient to support domestic violence victims.
  • Sarah Brown (Southland resident): Expressed concerns about the domestic relations court system, stating her case has been pending for over nine and a half years. She noted that the case was moved from Bridgeview, requiring over an hour of travel, and urged prioritization of accessibility and humane processes.
  • Diane Brown (mother/grandmother): Called for accountability for GALs, data production, evaluations, and judicial training and oversight. Stated that the system is "broken" and that her grandson is traumatized.
  • Joseph Jones (retired sheriff's superintendent): Disputed the presentation's claim that body attachments for non-payment of GAL fees are rare, stating that in his 30 years of service, both men and women have been held in custody on such orders. He raised concerns about fairness, unclear court orders, and lack of coordination among departments, noting that "the system is broken, and everybody in this room owns a piece of that."
  • Brittany Riley (Southland resident): Described victim needs including housing, financial assistance, counseling, medical support, transportation, and supervised visitation. She noted that the crisis center for South Suburbs has limited capacity, creating barriers for children and families.
  • Cassandra Taylor Bridges: Shared experiences from volunteering at a domestic violence shelter and emphasized that men also experience abuse. She criticized the public administrator for removing a case from court, which she said allowed violence to go unprosecuted.
  • George Blake Moore: Commented on racial assimilation, stating that domestic violence is now occurring in the Black community in ways it did not historically, and urged attention to this trend.

Discussion Items

1. Presentation on Guardians ad Litem, Child Representatives, and Attorneys for Children

Presenter: Hannah Cholinski, Senior Domestic Division Attorney, Office of the Chief Judge.

  • Overview: The domestic relations division operates under the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (IMDMA). GALs, child representatives, and attorneys for children are appointed to assist the court in determining the best interest of children, particularly in high-conflict cases. Only 5% of eligible cases (3,484 out of 62,224 filed from 2023 to 2025) have such appointments.
  • Roles: GALs are the court's own witnesses, investigate, and make recommendations; child representatives advocate for a position after investigation and have a confidential relationship with the child; attorneys for children provide full legal counsel steered by the child (rarely used).
  • Training and Qualifications: Attorneys must have at least five years of family law experience, complete a two-day training (including DV training), and attend ongoing CLEs. The mentorship program pairs new attorneys with experienced practitioners.
  • Fees: GAL fees are classified as child support under statute and cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. Pro bono appointments are required annually for court-approved attorneys. Fee waivers are available for litigants who qualify under the federal poverty level (e.g., $33,000 for a family of four).
  • Grievances: Litigants can file a motion to discharge the appointed attorney, appeal to the appellate court, or file a complaint with the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Committee (ARDC) for attorneys or the Judicial Inquiry Board (JIB) for judges.
  • Body Attachments: Cholinski stated that body attachments for non-payment are extremely rare, with only four judges reporting one instance each. She described a typical timeline where a purge order is set and continued for months before any attachment is issued.

Commissioner Questions and Discussion:

  • Commissioner Bridget Degnan questioned the financial burden on families, noting that a family of four earning just over $33,000 is ineligible for fee waivers but may face GAL costs of $7,500–$20,000. She urged the task force to engage state legislators to address this.
  • Commissioner Miller asked about the grievance process, clarifying that ARDC handles attorney misconduct and JIB handles judicial misconduct, and that complaints are confidential unless they lead to public discipline.
  • Commissioner Miller also asked about the process for waiving a written GAL report; litigants can jointly request a waiver, which the judge must confirm on the record.

2. Presentation from Governor State University Legal Clinic

Presenter: Dr. Phyllis West, Founding Director.

  • Clinic Overview: The clinic opened in June 2023, providing pro bono legal services in family law, housing, immigration, and expungement. It serves hundreds of community members, primarily from Cook County, with two part-time attorneys and three pro bono attorneys. Social work interns and faculty provide support, addressing mental health and psychosocial barriers.
  • Observed Gaps in Southland: Dr. West identified a lack of "radical hospitality" at the Markham Courthouse, where people feel unsafe and intimidated. She noted a shortage of court advocates and visitation centers (only one in the area). She emphasized the need for a public health lens, prioritizing suburbs, and establishing an alliance for coordinated services.
  • Recommendations: Use a public health lens to address root causes; fund education on healthy relationships; increase access to child visitation service centers; and create a Southland alliance to avoid service duplication and ensure warm handoffs.

Commissioner Questions:

  • Commissioner Miller asked about the biggest gap at the Markham Courthouse; Dr. West cited rude treatment and lack of safety, as well as insufficient court advocates.
  • Commissioner Miller inquired about visitation centers; Dr. West confirmed only one exists and that police stations are not appropriate for child exchanges.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes or directives were taken. The task force received the presentations and public testimony for consideration.
  • Commissioner Degnan suggested that the discussion on GAL fee structures and waivers should involve state legislative representatives to explore statutory changes.
  • The task force acknowledged the need for continued collaboration to address gaps in the Southland, including improving courthouse hospitality, expanding pro bono services, and increasing coordination among agencies.
  • The meeting was adjourned at approximately 11:30 AM.

Meeting Transcript

Yeah. Thank you all for being here this morning. Um, do we have any registered public speakers? Yes. Members of the public who wish to testify have until twenty-four hours before the schedule start at the meeting to register in order to do so. Speakers will have three minutes to address the task force and will be alerted when they have one minute time remaining, one thirty seconds remain, and when the time has expired. Tomorrow, I am bringing that legislation that you started to the city of County Met City. Um domestic violence in the County Met City is rampant throughout the Southland. The numbers are increasing. Um legislation was started in Cook County and it was championed and partnered in City of Chicago. We are hardest hit in the Southland, and sometimes it seems like we are overlooked. Um and our courthouses out in the Southland are some of the worst throughout the county. Um Marshall Courthouse does not have access or the funding that is needed to support domestic violence victims. Um, oftentimes just trying to enter the building and maneuver and navigate the system, re-triggers and re-victimizes the victim. Um, I wanted to thank you because in County Met City, we are going to tomorrow evening uh put forth similar legislation that you drafted to support the residents, employees, elected officials, and all those that walk through Calumet City, and we would like to partner more with City of Chicago and Cook County for domestic violence uh protection and support. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much. Next up is Sarah Brown. Good morning. Go ahead. Good morning, everyone. Uh, my name is Sarah Brown. Uh I am a resident of the Southland region. Uh I am here today to express my concerns regarding the ongoing challenges faced by family navigating the domestic relations court system. I'm currently involved in a domestic relations case that has been pending for a little bit over nine and a half years. Uh, this case was originally heard in the Bridgeview Courthouse, which was accessible to my community. Um, I now find myself traveling over an hour uh to attend hearings, which places an enormous burden not only on me, but also my family who relies on me. I would like to bring to your attention Illinois statutes related to appointment and compensation of GAL and child representatives according to 750 ILCS 5506 and 750 ILCS506.6. This is our Illinois statute that the court has the authority to appoint GAL and child representatives to ensure the best interest of children that are upheld in domestic relations cases. While I appreciate the need for such services, the implementation has become increasingly problematic. Moreover, I like to remind you of the statute that determines the hourly rates that's set that's set by judges for these representatives. The expectations for families to bear the cost of representation along with burdens of lengthy travel, adds unnecessary strain during an already challenging time. It is vital that we prioritize accessibility within domestic relations system when families should not have to endure significant tribal hardships that could deter them from seeking the justice they deserve. I urge all bodies to consider these issues seriously and it's for solutions that would make the processes more efficient and humane for all involved. Thank you. Thank you so much. Next is Diane Brown. Good morning, everyone. Good morning. And uh regarding domestic violence and the task force that was put together regarding domestic violence. I'm a mother, I'm a grandmother, I'm a great-grandmother. And uh going to court with my daughter Sarah when I retired January uh 2024. It was an urgency uh because of a case that was uh in court for seven years, now it's nine. And um to see the courtroom now when I was in the in the courtrooms in the 80s is totally different, but I still believe in democracy. I believe in the court system, I believe in uh the city of Chicago, Cook County. Uh those who are in office now, I voted for all of you all. Domestic violence isn't going away, it's not and it affects and people that are meeting along this journey. Um there should be accountability with GALs, believe it or not in the courtroom behind the judge, it has in God we trust. My faith was shaken, pretending that I was a homeless person wearing the same thing the court with my daughter 2024, 2025 to see because each year she would tell me that she's gone through another judge and all of that.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com