Technology.

With the time of one o'clock come in and been a long, long while back.

I would like to call the technology and innovation committee back to order.

Thank you, Chairman, at your recess meeting.

You had all members present except for excuse absence for Commissioner Sean Morrison.

Fantastic.

Uh, are there any registered public speakers for uh this meeting?

Yes, yes, you do.

I don't see them all in the room.

So as I call your name, please let us know that you are still present.

Jessica Jackson, Taiwan Sims, George Blake Moore, Christian Harris, and Zoe Lee.

I see two of them in that and three of them in that order.

Jessica Taiwan, George, you may begin.

My name is Jessica Jackson.

And I see that they send sheriffs in here when I'm in here.

Matter of fact, you got a white shirt right here.

I'm curious to know how is it that they send the sheriffs in here?

Matter of fact, it was five.

I took their pictures, right?

I'm trying to figure out how they send sheriffs in here to take me out if I say something that's in response to something that's a lie coming from that podium.

But for some reason, they can't seem to get the sheriffs and sheriff Dart to deal with this fraudulent lime cream sticker that was put on my basement door.

I don't understand it.

You got a whole fraudulent sticker here with a fraudulent case number on it to protect the public administrators who was doing a fraudulent eviction.

And you send sheriffs in here.

You got a white shirt in here right now.

Now it's on camera, it's on camera.

Well, I'm telling this white shirt.

Come on, white shirt that's up here looking for me.

I'm telling you, this is a fraudulent document that the sheriff department, Sheriff Rodriguez, in fact, put on my door.

And how do I how do I know it's fraudulent from the case number?

The case number on here says 2025 37940.

The case number that's actually on the eviction that I did is 2025 1709 328.

This fraudulent document, this fraudulent sticker, doesn't even have enough numbers on it.

And then you all are going to use sheriff personnel to come up in here with the intention of harassing me instead of dealing with their own corruption.

Their own corruption.

One minute.

So now, my retaliation charge just got filed, and you all should be getting the summons from pretty soon.

What I need to do, I'm going to amend it.

Or in fact, I'm going to do one that's completely against the sheriff department.

Y'all gonna stop harassing me.

You're gonna stop harassing me unless you're willing to deal with this with what y'all doing.

I'm sending I'm putting charges on all the sheriffs.

Yeah, that's how we doing that.

Next speaker, please.

Um good afternoon, committee.

This doesn't have anything to do with technology.

My apology.

Well, it does though, because okay.

Well, sorry about that.

Um good afternoon, Commission.

Um this does have to do with technologies.

Matter of fact, our clerk's office, where in 2023 I came in to file an order protection against uh Alberta Reed for destroying my property and for also a domestic abuse.

I was the petitioner in that case up until maybe up until August 25th, 2023.

Then I became the respondent.

However, I have a case summary here, which is 23 OP72315, which lists me as the petitioner.

And then I have also another case summary here.

However, in this case summary, up until 516, 2023, I'm the petitioner, petitioner, petitioner, and then 915, 2023.

I was it was switched over and I become the respondent.

That's when Alberta Reed was given a two-year plenary order default.

And it's either this either is procedural, intentional, or a clerk's error.