Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The City Council convened a special meeting on July 23, 2026, to conduct a removal hearing for Mayor Paulette Guajardo under Article II, Section 11 of the City Charter. The hearing focused on allegations of misconduct, malfeasance, and willful neglect stemming from a $2 million incentive for the Homewood Suites project, specifically concerning a PowerPoint slide where dates on a FEMA flood map screenshot were obscured. The meeting recessed without a vote, set to resume on August 6, 2026.
Okay, good morning, everyone. As Mayor Pertim, I will call this meeting to order. Miss City Secretary, will you please call the role for the required charter officers? Mayor Pro Tem Caelan Paxson. Present. Councilmember Sylvia Campos. Here. Eric Anthou. He said he will be running a little late. Okay. Gailard Nandes. Mark Scott. Carolyn Vaughn. Roland Baretta and Everett Roy have recused themselves. Assistant City Manager Ernesto de la Garza. Here. Assistant City Attorney Lisa Aguilar. Here. Okay, we do have a quorum president to of the council and the required charter officers present to conduct the meeting. Thank you. At this time, I will open public comment then, and to continue as we have the last two days of this, we will do one minute per commenter. I understand our first commenter, Susie Saldania is not present. Okay, next will be Mark Munster. Melinda de los Santos. Good morning, Melinda de Los Santos District Two. Nice things were said about the mayor, and that's wonderful. She does have good qualities, which is why it's important to hear evidence. Why try to delay hearings through a appeals which were denied to suppress evidence with numerous requests to exclude exhibits and depositions to deny this tribunal their jurisdiction in handling this manner. They don't use the same legal procedures. Rather, it's more informal and flexible with the ability to accept hearsay. This hearing is about whether the mayor is guilty of misconduct, malfeasance, or a willful neglect of her performance of official duties. There was some innuendo about several people, but that does not determine whether somebody has done wrong or guilt or anything else. This is not being handled properly in my opinion, and I would please request that y'all, you know, this isn't this is bad for Corpus Christi. It's been bad for Corpus Christie. If case you haven't been paying attention, thank you. Okay. Yes, Ms. Rebecca, would is that concluded? Yes, ma'am, that concludes the public comment period. Okay. So this morning, before we move in to continuing our testimony, um we've been advised to wait for all members of this panel to arrive. So if we if we okay, perfect. So then we will recess momentarily until he arrives. We'll give him okay. We will call this meeting back in order.