OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Corpus Christi, Texas/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Special City Council Hearing on Removal of Mayor Paulette Guajardo - July 23, 2026

City Council — Thursday, July 23, 2026
BodyCorpus Christi, Texas
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, July 23, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 5:21:56

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

2:02

Okay, good morning, everyone.

2:04

As Mayor Pertim, I will call this meeting to order.

2:07

Miss City Secretary, will you please call the role for the required charter officers?

Unassigned speaker

2:12

Mayor

Speaker 2

2:12

Pro Tem Caelan Paxson.

Speaker 1

2:14

Present.

Speaker 2

2:15

Councilmember Sylvia Campos.

Speaker 1

2:17

Here.

Speaker 2

2:17

Eric Anthou.

Speaker 1

2:19

He said he will be running a little late.

Speaker 2

2:21

Okay.

2:22

Gailard Nandes.

2:24

Mark Scott.

2:25

Carolyn Vaughn.

2:27

Roland Baretta and Everett Roy have recused themselves.

2:31

Assistant City Manager Ernesto de la Garza.

2:34

Here.

2:34

Assistant City Attorney Lisa Aguilar.

2:37

Here.

2:37

Okay, we do have a quorum president to of the council and the required charter officers present to conduct the meeting.

Speaker 1

2:43

Thank you.

2:44

At this time, I will open public comment then, and to continue as we have the last two days of this, we will do one minute per commenter.

2:54

I understand our first commenter, Susie Saldania is not present.

3:00

Okay, next will be Mark Munster.

3:05

Melinda de los Santos.

Unassigned speaker

3:13

Good

Speaker 3

3:14

morning, Melinda de Los Santos District Two.

3:16

Nice things were said about the mayor, and that's wonderful.

3:19

She does have good qualities, which is why it's important to hear evidence.

3:23

Why try to delay hearings through a appeals which were denied to suppress evidence with numerous requests to exclude exhibits and depositions to deny this tribunal their jurisdiction in handling this manner.

3:38

They don't use the same legal procedures.

3:40

Rather, it's more informal and flexible with the ability to accept hearsay.

3:45

This hearing is about whether the mayor is guilty of misconduct, malfeasance, or a willful neglect of her performance of official duties.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

There was some innuendo about several people, but that does not determine whether somebody has done wrong or guilt or anything else.

Speaker 4

5:08

This is not being handled properly in my opinion, and I would please request that y'all, you know, this isn't this is bad for Corpus Christi.

5:18

It's been bad for Corpus Christie.

5:20

If case you haven't been paying attention, thank

Unassigned speaker

5:23

you.

Speaker 1

5:37

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

5:38

Yes,

Speaker 1

5:38

Ms.

5:38

Rebecca, would is that concluded?

5:40

Yes,

Speaker 2

5:40

ma'am, that concludes the public comment period.

Speaker 1

5:42

Okay.

5:43

So this morning, before we move in to continuing our testimony, um we've been advised to wait for all members of this panel to arrive.

5:53

So if we if we okay, perfect.

5:58

So then we will recess momentarily until he arrives.

6:01

We'll give him okay.

6:11

We will call this meeting back in order.

6:13

Mr.

6:13

Allison, if you will proceed.

Speaker 5

6:16

May I level my objection that I need to level everything?

6:20

Thank you.

6:20

I apologize.

6:21

I was a little tardy, and I've got to make an objection.

Unassigned speaker

6:23

Uh

Speaker 5

6:24

objection respondent renews her continuing due process objection that members of this tribunal are material witnesses with personal knowledge of disputed adjudicative effects and therefore cannot simultaneously act as neutral fact finders.

6:36

Respondent further objects to the admission of the evidence on all previously asserted evidentiary grounds.

6:41

Thank

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Pending Litigation█████████████████████████████████████████████73%
Economic Development███████12%
Procedural████6%
Procurement Policy██4%
Public Engagement█2%
Public Information Management█2%
Infrastructure Projects█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Special City Council Hearing on Removal of Mayor Paulette Guajardo

The City Council convened a special meeting on July 23, 2026, to conduct a removal hearing for Mayor Paulette Guajardo under Article II, Section 11 of the City Charter. The hearing focused on allegations of misconduct, malfeasance, and willful neglect stemming from a $2 million incentive for the Homewood Suites project, specifically concerning a PowerPoint slide where dates on a FEMA flood map screenshot were obscured. The meeting recessed without a vote, set to resume on August 6, 2026.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Melinda de los Santos (District Two) urged the council to focus on the evidence of misconduct rather than the mayor's personal qualities. She stated the proceedings were not being handled properly and were harmful to the city.

Discussion Items

  • Deposition of Developer Philip Ramirez: Testimony from Philip Ramirez, the architect and project applicant, was presented. Ramirez stated the missing April 2022 dates on the FEMA slide were an accidental formatting error, denying any intent to deceive. He refused to answer questions about the Texas Penal Code's forgery statute on advice of counsel. He testified to explaining the error to multiple council members, including the Mayor, before the final vote.
  • Testimony of Mayor Paulette Guajardo: Mayor Guajardo testified in her defense. She agreed with police and investigator findings that the slide was altered and intentionally so. She maintained this did not constitute a crime or misconduct on her part, asserting she was not formally told the investigation had concluded the document was fraudulent at the time of her actions. She defended her vote, her text communication with the developer during a confidential meeting, and her numerous phone calls (over a dozen calls on February 25th and 26th prior to the second reading). She disputed City Manager Peter Zanoni’s testimony that he explicitly warned her the supporting document was an illegal forgery.
  • Evidence on the FEMA Narrative: The hearing covered evidence that the FEMA flood maps were preliminary in October 2020 and finalized in April 2022, contradicting the narrative in the altered slide that the requirements were "new" or "unexpected." The timeline showed that following a complaint from a competitor, the original ordinance was withdrawn on February 27, 2024, before a second reading could occur.

Key Outcomes

  • No final action on the removal resolution was taken during this session.
  • The hearing was adjourned until August 6, 2026, at 9:00 AM.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, good morning, everyone. As Mayor Pertim, I will call this meeting to order. Miss City Secretary, will you please call the role for the required charter officers? Mayor Pro Tem Caelan Paxson. Present. Councilmember Sylvia Campos. Here. Eric Anthou. He said he will be running a little late. Okay. Gailard Nandes. Mark Scott. Carolyn Vaughn. Roland Baretta and Everett Roy have recused themselves. Assistant City Manager Ernesto de la Garza. Here. Assistant City Attorney Lisa Aguilar. Here. Okay, we do have a quorum president to of the council and the required charter officers present to conduct the meeting. Thank you. At this time, I will open public comment then, and to continue as we have the last two days of this, we will do one minute per commenter. I understand our first commenter, Susie Saldania is not present. Okay, next will be Mark Munster. Melinda de los Santos. Good morning, Melinda de Los Santos District Two. Nice things were said about the mayor, and that's wonderful. She does have good qualities, which is why it's important to hear evidence. Why try to delay hearings through a appeals which were denied to suppress evidence with numerous requests to exclude exhibits and depositions to deny this tribunal their jurisdiction in handling this manner. They don't use the same legal procedures. Rather, it's more informal and flexible with the ability to accept hearsay. This hearing is about whether the mayor is guilty of misconduct, malfeasance, or a willful neglect of her performance of official duties. There was some innuendo about several people, but that does not determine whether somebody has done wrong or guilt or anything else. This is not being handled properly in my opinion, and I would please request that y'all, you know, this isn't this is bad for Corpus Christi. It's been bad for Corpus Christie. If case you haven't been paying attention, thank you. Okay. Yes, Ms. Rebecca, would is that concluded? Yes, ma'am, that concludes the public comment period. Okay. So this morning, before we move in to continuing our testimony, um we've been advised to wait for all members of this panel to arrive. So if we if we okay, perfect. So then we will recess momentarily until he arrives. We'll give him okay. We will call this meeting back in order.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com