OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Corpus Christi, Texas/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Special City Council Meeting: Mayor Guajardo Removal Hearing - August 7, 2026

City Council — Friday, August 7, 2026
BodyCorpus Christi, Texas
SessionCity Council
DateFriday, August 7, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:25:20

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

7:25

Good morning, everyone.

7:29

I, as Mayor Pro Tim, I call this meeting to order.

7:32

Um, Miss Rebecca, if you can take roll, please.

Speaker 2

7:35

Mayor Pro Tem Caelan Paxson

Speaker 1

7:37

present.

Speaker 2

7:38

Council Member Sylvia Campos, Eric Anthou, Gil Hernandez, Mark Scott, Carolyn Vaughn.

7:46

Assistant City Manager at Ernesto de la Garza.

Speaker 3

7:49

Here.

Speaker 2

7:50

Assistant City Attorney Lisa Aguilar.

7:52

Here.

7:53

Mayor Pro Tem and Council, a quorum of the Council, and the required charter officers are present to conduct the meeting.

Speaker 1

7:59

Thank you.

8:00

At this time, I would like to go to our next item, which is public comment.

8:05

Public comment will be limited to one minute per speaker this morning.

8:09

And first we have Samuel Andre Freyer.

Speaker 4

8:18

Um, Sami Andre Fryer.

8:20

Um, I just wanted to say I'm neither here to either support the mayor, nor am I here to support um the those who have filed the petition.

8:29

I'm actually here for one thing, and that's to um to encourage the tribunal to to be forthright, to be truthful and unbiased, and carry those procedures in a way that without any ulterior motives.

8:46

And that's so important because the good thing is we're doing this so that we can possibly get things on record.

8:53

That's a good thing.

8:54

So regardless of the outcome, that is a very good thing.

8:58

But I wanted to say one thing in the Bible in Proverbs eighteen seventeen, it says the first one to plead his cause, seems right until his neighbor comes and examines him.

9:09

So keep that in mind, and I pray that we will do the right thing when it comes to this.

9:13

Thank you.

Speaker 5

9:28

I was determined to keep an open mind about until I heard the evidence on both sides.

9:33

However, I didn't think I was going to hear much evidence yesterday.

9:36

No disrespect, Mr.

9:37

Flood, but you pulled a doctor Fauci on

Unassigned speaker

9:39

me.

Speaker 5

9:40

However, after hearing the evidence, uh, I was wondering, is there such a thing as a RICO ruling for malfeasance, misconduct, incompetence, and willful neglect?

9:51

From the beginning of this application all the way to the sound sign contract, this appears to be red flags everywhere.

Unassigned speaker

10:00

Just to name a few, you know, requesting for funds for new FEMA requirements, disappearance of dates from screenshots, significant disparities of money granted between agencies, FEMA requirements versus street level activation, contract signed before the second reading of city council, or if not the four turned into a one.

Speaker 5

10:21

And the and then the verbiage of the second reading differing from the first.

10:25

All I'm asking is for truth and transparency.

10:28

Thank

Unassigned speaker

10:29

you.

Speaker 1

10:30

Thank you.

10:30

Kathy Fulton.

Speaker 6

10:48

Hi, my name is Kathy Fulton.

10:50

I'm from Port Aranzas, Texas.

10:52

And I just want to say one thing.

11:00

And this matters to us too.

11:03

Okay, it really does.

11:05

Because your actions impact your surrounding communities.

11:10

And I just want to say that the poll that was online with Chris News says 70, I think it's 72 or 74 percent of the people aren't supporting this, don't want this.

11:23

Only 14 percent are supporting or say that this should finish happening.

Unassigned speaker

11:28

I

Speaker 6

11:28

want you to think about that.

11:30

Those are your voters.

11:32

You know, 74 percent of your voters are saying don't do this.

Unassigned speaker

11:37

And

Speaker 6

11:37

I think you need to be paying attention.

11:39

Thank

Unassigned speaker

11:39

you.

Speaker 1

11:40

Thank you.

11:41

Sean Merritt.

Speaker 7

11:48

Welcome back again, everyone.

11:50

Well, I'm a little sad.

11:51

I brought a gift for the hitman journalists, and so he needs it.

11:58

We'll leave that there for him.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Pending Litigation█████████████████████████████████████████████65%
Procedural██████████████████26%
Public Safety███4%
Public Engagement██3%
Parks and Recreation█1%
Community Engagement█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Special City Council Meeting: Mayor Guajardo Removal Hearing - August 7, 2026

The Corpus Christi City Council convened a special meeting on August 7, 2026, sitting as the tribunal for the removal hearing of Mayor Paulette Guajardo. The final day of the proceedings included public comment, a rebuttal witness, closing arguments, and executive session deliberation. Following the deliberation, the council returned to vote on the specific charges and penalties.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Samuel Andre Freyer urged the council to proceed forthrightly and without ulterior motives, emphasizing the importance of getting facts on the record regardless of the outcome.
  • An unnaned speaker cited “red flags” in the process—including altered screenshots, fund disparities, and procedural irregularities—and called for truth and transparency.
  • Kathy Fulton of Port Aransas cited an online KRIS News poll indicating that an estimated 72–74% of voters opposed the council’s actions and only 14% supported continuing the removal process, urging the council to listen to constituents.
  • Sean Merritt described the hearing as a cleansing of the “body politic,” urged the council to follow the city charter, and alleged a history of impropriety involving the mayor.

Discussion Items

  • The hearing addressed three articles of impeachment: (1) Aiding a fraud upon the taxpayers regarding an altered FEMA flood-map narrative for a hotel incentive; (2) Perjury during her August 6, 2025 deposition; (3) Breach of confidentiality regarding confidential information from the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corporation (CCREDC).
  • Respondent’s counsel (Mr. Flood) objected to calling Councilmembers Sylvia Campos and Gil Hernandez as witnesses because they served as judges in the proceeding. The tribunal sustained the objections. Flood made proffers that their testimony would have covered bias, outside communications, and private knowledge.
  • Petitioners’ counsel (Mr. Allison) called Dr. Brian Gully as a rebuttal witness, testifying remotely from St. Lucia. Dr. Gully stated that during a November 2023 CCREDC meeting, he informed the mayor that the cited FEMA rules were years old, not newly released, contradicting the project’s central narrative. The defense objected that the rebuttal was improper and cross-examined Dr. Gully extensively on his personal and professional relationship with petitioners’ counsel.
  • In closing, Mr. Allison argued the mayor was aware of the fraud, promoted the incentive despite warnings, committed perjury, and violated her confidentiality pledge. He urged removal, stating, “what we tolerate, we become.”
  • Mr. Flood argued the evidence was based on speculation and did not meet the preponderance standard, noting the mayor did not create the slide, the council was similarly misled, and perjury allegations misconstrued her deposition testimony. He urged the council to allow voters to decide.

Key Outcomes

  • The council returned from executive session and clarified the voting thresholds: removal requires five votes; other penalties require a simple majority.
  • Charge 1 (Aiding Fraud / Misconduct): Sustained (5–1). Motion for removal failed. Motion to suspend for 30 days passed (5–1).
  • Charge 2 (Perjury / Misconduct): Sustained (5–1). Motions for removal and suspension failed. Motion for a formal reprimand passed (5–1).
  • Charge 3 (Breach of Confidentiality / Misconduct): Sustained (4–2). Motions for removal, suspension, and reprimand all failed.
  • Result: Mayor Paulette Guajardo was suspended from office for 30 days and issued a formal reprimand by the City Council.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning, everyone. I, as Mayor Pro Tim, I call this meeting to order. Um, Miss Rebecca, if you can take roll, please. Mayor Pro Tem Caelan Paxson present. Council Member Sylvia Campos, Eric Anthou, Gil Hernandez, Mark Scott, Carolyn Vaughn. Assistant City Manager at Ernesto de la Garza. Here. Assistant City Attorney Lisa Aguilar. Here. Mayor Pro Tem and Council, a quorum of the Council, and the required charter officers are present to conduct the meeting. Thank you. At this time, I would like to go to our next item, which is public comment. Public comment will be limited to one minute per speaker this morning. And first we have Samuel Andre Freyer. Um, Sami Andre Fryer. Um, I just wanted to say I'm neither here to either support the mayor, nor am I here to support um the those who have filed the petition. I'm actually here for one thing, and that's to um to encourage the tribunal to to be forthright, to be truthful and unbiased, and carry those procedures in a way that without any ulterior motives. And that's so important because the good thing is we're doing this so that we can possibly get things on record. That's a good thing. So regardless of the outcome, that is a very good thing. But I wanted to say one thing in the Bible in Proverbs eighteen seventeen, it says the first one to plead his cause, seems right until his neighbor comes and examines him. So keep that in mind, and I pray that we will do the right thing when it comes to this. Thank you. I was determined to keep an open mind about until I heard the evidence on both sides. However, I didn't think I was going to hear much evidence yesterday. No disrespect, Mr. Flood, but you pulled a doctor Fauci on me. However, after hearing the evidence, uh, I was wondering, is there such a thing as a RICO ruling for malfeasance, misconduct, incompetence, and willful neglect? From the beginning of this application all the way to the sound sign contract, this appears to be red flags everywhere. Just to name a few, you know, requesting for funds for new FEMA requirements, disappearance of dates from screenshots, significant disparities of money granted between agencies, FEMA requirements versus street level activation, contract signed before the second reading of city council, or if not the four turned into a one. And the and then the verbiage of the second reading differing from the first. All I'm asking is for truth and transparency. Thank you. Thank you. Kathy Fulton. Hi, my name is Kathy Fulton. I'm from Port Aranzas, Texas. And I just want to say one thing. And this matters to us too. Okay, it really does. Because your actions impact your surrounding communities. And I just want to say that the poll that was online with Chris News says 70, I think it's 72 or 74 percent of the people aren't supporting this, don't want this. Only 14 percent are supporting or say that this should finish happening. I want you to think about that. Those are your voters. You know, 74 percent of your voters are saying don't do this.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com