Council Bluffs City Council Meeting - August 25, 2025: Bond Sale, Credit Rating, and East Manoa Housing RFP
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
City Council Meeting Summary - August 25, 2025
The Council Bluffs City Council met on August 25, 2025, to discuss the city's credit rating, approve bond sales, address a civil service hiring waiver, and advance the East Manoa phase one housing project. A presentation on a proposed OHV park was also given. The meeting included multiple public hearings and resolutions.
Consent Calendar
- Approved the consent agenda as presented.
Public Comments & Testimony
- No public comments were offered during the public hearings. All hearings were opened and closed with no testimony.
Discussion Items
- Moody's Credit Rating & Bond Sale: Financial advisor John presented the city's Moody's credit rating analysis. The city holds a double A2 rating, with a scorecard indicating double A1, suggesting upward pressure. The city's strong fund balances, low debt burden, and rapid debt repayment were highlighted. The bond sale for Series A (GO bonds, $5.205 million to Robert W. Baird at 3.0933% TIC) and Series B (GO bonds, $2.21 million to Piper Sandler at 4.1865% TIC) received nine bids each, with broad geographic interest.
- Civil Service Waiver (Resolution 25-215): Staff requested a one-year renewal of a waiver for civil service hiring procedures for the utility worker position. Council members expressed concern about watering down civil service but noted the waiver expedites hiring when lists are quickly exhausted. The waiver was approved with the understanding that it will be reevaluated.
- RFP Disqualification Language (Resolution 5G): Discussion centered on adding language to RFPs prohibiting communication with bidders outside the formal process. The city attorney clarified that this protects the integrity of the process and prevents improper influence. Council members discussed the need for transparency and the ability to receive public concerns. The language was adopted as part of the RFP.
- Background Screening Amendment: Councilmember Jill proposed an amendment to Resolution 25-219 requiring contractors to use an employment background screening service. The amendment failed for lack of a second. The original motion was then approved.
- OHV Park Proposal: A representative from River Valley Trail Riders, along with Butch, presented a plan to reopen the former OHV park on the wet side of the levee, with potential expansion onto city-owned land. The proposal is in three phases, with no cost to the city, and Pottawatomie County would manage the site. The council received the presentation and asked questions; a councilmember requested a follow-up meeting.
Key Outcomes
- Approved: Resolution 25-209 (alley sewer reconstruction), 25-210 (pump station generator), 25-211A (Series A bond sale to Robert W. Baird), 25-211B (Series B bond sale to Piper Sandler), 25-212 (East Manoa subdivision final plat), 25-213 (development agreement with OER LLC), 25-214 (water/sewer lien schedule), 25-215 (civil service waiver), 25-216 (Trolley Park playground improvements contract), 25-217 (PR1 planned residential development plan), 25-218 (reject all submissions for East Manoa phase one), 25-219 (minimum development requirements and RFP for East Manoa phase one), and 25-180 (deny reconsideration of Sedback Homes).
- Failed: Amendment to Resolution 25-219 requiring background screening (no second).
- Next Steps: The East Manoa phase one RFP will be issued with a public hearing set for October 6, 2025. The OHV park proposal will be further discussed with the county and state agencies.
Meeting Transcript
Yeah, you can go through the rating process if you wouldn't mind the So I think in your packet you should receive something. This is called the credit opinion from Moody's Investor Service. And we wanted to spend a few minutes just to kind of break down how does the rating agencies kind of figure out what your rating is. And if you go back to page five, there's a lot of information in here, but it really kind of boils down to page five. They call this your quantitative credit score. Everybody get to that page. And it's it now up the top says uh methodology and scorecard factors. So once everyone there, you can see here that uh they've broken this down into different categories. Uh one of the categories is the economy, how well is the city doing, and in your case, the metro area. Uh the second piece is the financial performance of the city. Uh, then they also look at the institutional framework. That would be like the state of Iowa and how you have to live within the rules of the state of Iowa. Leverage, and then some uh some notching factors or non-notching factors. So on the economy side, uh the first thing that they look at is the regiment residential income ratio, and they're trying to figure out what the median family income is based on census data. And you can see that you're 0.88 point eight eight point two percent. So you're less than the average of one one hundred percent. And that's pretty typical what we see in larger communities uh for that. But you can see that's 10% of your overall rating score, so they kind of tacked you in as an A category uh for that metric right there. And that's got 10% uh overall of the rating. Nothing you can really do about that. It's it's kind of is the what the community is. Uh just to give an example, the city Clive, for example, that are 160 percent. So they feel that there's more wealth there, they can borrow more, and so on and so forth, is their uh their view of that. I think from what they told me, what's if we went up to 100, that would help us. That would I and I honestly think uh this is one of those factors that's holding you back. It kind of is uh who you are. If this went to 100, I do believe that that would help you get to that next level. The other is the market value. Uh, this is your market value of the community divided by the number of people that you have in the 136,000, that's actually really, really good. Uh the data centers bringing a lot of valuation. Uh the population is a little bit smaller, so any time you've got that kind of uh uh 136,000, that you can see that's in the double A category. I don't see that very often. Most cities in Iowa are an A. So you're really gonna look at real well on that one. And then the economic growth factor, they're trying to do some math on your GDP of the of the metro area. Um and you can see uh you have your growth here at 0.4. I normally see negative growth, is what I see in all the communities. So you can see here uh that's a triple A category. So the metro area here is uh live and well and doing really good for you. And they've got you kind of categorized at a triple A. This is about 30 percent of your overall rating. Difficult for you to control. It's just the community and the nature and where you're at, those types of things. Now, this next category, financial performance. Uh, you can see this is another 30 percent. This is really the area that you can control quite a bit. Uh average fund balance ratio. So what they're doing there is they're trying to figure out of all of your uh operating cash that you have on hand relative to your operating revenues, uh how big how much financial flexibility do you have? The higher that is, the the better the the uh indicator is. In fact, uh this is your strong point here, which is a big component of your rating.
openpublica.com