Special Cranston City Council Meeting on Splash Pad Location – September 10, 2025
Special Cranston City Council Meeting on Splash Pad Location – September 10, 2025
The Cranston City Council held a special meeting on September 10, 2025, to solicit public and council input on the location of a new city splash pad. The administration, led by Director Maretti and Recreation Director Steven Piscopello, presented three potential sites: Doric Avenue, Cranston Stadium, and the Budlong Pool complex. The city has approximately $250,000 in federal OPA funds available for construction, plus already purchased water park features and electronics, with no direct taxpayer expense. The council does not hold a formal vote on the location.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Frankie and Jojo Martins (residents of Cranston, 64 Massachusetts Ave) expressed support for locating the splash pad near the Budlong Pool. They cited the benefit of having both a pool and splash pad for children of all ages, the presence of lifeguards for safety, and the ability for the whole city to enjoy the facility.
- Kimberly Bagosian (45 Mount View Drive, Cranston) opposed the splash pad entirely, stating, "Cranston does not need a splash pad. Please open up the Budlong Pool."
- Justin McCarthy (Chestnut Avenue, Cranston) supported the Budlong Pool location, leveraging his eight years of lifeguard experience. He noted that lifeguards at the pool have rescue, first aid, and CPR certifications and could respond to emergencies at the splash pad, while the other two sites lack such infrastructure, as well as existing changing rooms and plumbing.
Discussion Items
- Presentation by Director Steven Piscopello: He showed a rendering of the splash pad (designed for ages 3–13) and described the three administration-identified sites:
- Doric Avenue: Noted as a potential location but with limited details.
- Cranston Stadium: Offers vast land near tennis courts; would require building standalone changing rooms and new plumbing, increasing costs.
- Budlong Pool Complex: Existing amenities (pool, restrooms, changing rooms, parking, plumbing) and staff (lifeguards) make it cost-effective and family-friendly for multiple age groups.
- Councilmembers' positions: Nearly all members expressed strong support for the Budlong Pool location:
- Councilwoman Ryan (Ward 2) advocated for Budlong, noting positive community reception and the ability to serve all age groups.
- Councilman Ritz echoed support, citing Budlong as the best option due to existing facilities and lack of need for new building construction.
- Councilman Endor acknowledged Budlong’s cost-effectiveness but advocated for Cranston Stadium on behalf of his constituents; he suggested splitting the splash pad into two or converting an unused concession stand into bathrooms.
- Councilman Kepniano supported Budlong as a “crown jewel” complex, emphasizing the benefit of having a splash pad alongside the pool for families with children of different ages, and suggested adding splash pads in other wards in future years.
- Councilman Bonato agreed with colleagues, calling splash pads the recreation of the future—cost-effective and safer than pools. He shared personal experience of his children enjoying splash pads and highlighted the value of having both pool and splash pad in one complex.
- Council President Wall initially expressed his own support for Budlong and noted the council’s consensus with the administration.
- Director Maretti clarified that the council lacks a formal vote; the administration is seeking objective input. He also noted that if construction bids exceed the $250,000 allocation, excess OPA funds from other under-budget recreation projects may be available.
Key Outcomes
- No formal vote was taken, as the council does not have decision-making authority on the matter.
- Strong consensus among council members for the Budlong Pool complex as the preferred location, supported by the administration’s analysis and most public commenters.
- One speaker opposed the splash pad entirely, asking instead for the Budlong Pool to be opened.
- Councilman Endor placed a dissenting note advocating for Cranston Stadium as the primary location or consideration of a split installation.
- Next steps: The administration will consider all input (council feedback, public comments, and online submissions) before making a final decision. The project remains subject to construction bids and available funding.
Meeting Transcript
Okay, good evening. And welcome to this uh species special city council meeting regarding the splash pad location. It is September 10th, 2025. I'd like to call this meeting to order, and I asked the clerk to please call a roll. Councilman Papiano. President. Councilman. Here. Councilman Raziano. Councilman Heroyan. President Councilman. President. Councilman Rentz. Present. Councilman Traff Conti. Council President Wall. Here. Thank you. Okay, before we start, a little bit of a programming note. Um, I'm gonna open up the meeting by just explaining a couple of ground rules for those who are here this evening. This meeting is only concerning the splash pad and the uh various location options that people may come up with. That's what it was designed for. I believe it was at the request, if I recall in the meeting, uh the administration, Director Maretti mentioned that about a month ago during a council meeting. We thought it was a good idea. So before we even go to if you want to introduce it a little bit, Director, that would be fine, and then I'll take public comment. Sure. Uh uh thank you, Council President Raw. Thanks for calling the meeting on uh at the request of Mayor Hopkins um to be specific. And thank you for those who are attending and those people that may be online. Um as as uh indicated the uh the mayor uh is soliciting input from the city council uh and the public uh as to any input or suggestions as to where the next uh city splash pad should be located um you know before before the final decisions are made to do so. Um the city has uh uh approximately 250,000 dollars of approved opera funds available and uh uh designated uh for construction uh of a splash pad. Um this is on top of uh funds that have already been expended uh to purchase the water uh water park features and electronics um that were procured using opera funds. So there's uh I'll make the statement that there was uh no expense to the taxpayers. It's part of your federal dollars, I'm sure in some fashion paid for it throughout every resident, every taxpayer in the country, but it's probably a pretty good deal uh by using the OPA funds and not any direct uh funds from this uh directly from the city of Cranston. Um just want to make a note, um, as I mentioned, it's approximately 250,000. Uh judge you know, from the past, regardless of projects, whether the w whatever they are that there's construction project projects, when they go out to bid, they may not be exactly what we're the dollar amount where we're uh uh allowed or authorized. Um there could be a possibility that uh the administration could be coming back if the if the construction bids uh exceed that amount of money. Um but uh either way we believe that it probably wouldn't be or wouldn't be that much more. We wouldn't expect it to be all that much more. Um and uh we believe that there are uh some excess opera funds that could be available that were designated for other similar POCs and recreation facility projects uh where there are excess funds that that that came in uh under budget. So we have a perfect world. So I just want to put that little asterisk to this that there is that possibility. Can't be guaranteed, depending on what uh what the what the bids uh come in at. Um the we don't want to bias this discussion, certainly uh the administration is looking for objective input uh as to where uh uh uh uh the next splash pad should go. But in order to stir uh a bit of thought, the um the administration uh has met with uh the the director of Pox Rec, Steve Piscopello, who's here this evening, along with uh Director Correo uh from Public Works to basically search out or evaluate, you know, to give you a little uh thought process to other potential to various uh location potential locations throughout the city. So Mr. Piscopello will share with you some ideas, but please don't take it to the bank, but it's just met for discussion, and I can tell you what our thought process was, and certainly welcome any input. And again, we are soliciting uh objective uh suggestions um uh from both the the public here and online and most uh certainly uh with the city council. Um with that um uh director Piscapello uh can share, I believe, some an image of the splash pad, the final product once it's completed, and then he has uh um a slide, uh handouts that he could share to again the three sites, potential sites um that the administration has identified as potential. Um, but as I keep stressing, uh any other uh uh areas and justifications would be more than uh welcome.
openpublica.com