Cranston Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2026
Cranston Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2026
The Cranston Planning Commission met on May 5, 2026, at approximately 7:00 PM (transcript start time 22:21:36 UTC). The meeting opened with a moment of silence for Director Ashman's family and the swearing-in of new Commissioner John Carlosante. The commission addressed several items including a reinstatement request for a former prison site, a continuance, and a major discussion on a proposed 44-lot residential planned development (RPD) on Main Street (Vaughn Lane area). After extensive public testimony and expert review, the Vaughn Lane matter was continued to the June 2, 2026 meeting. The commission also issued zoning board recommendations on two other applications.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of Minutes: The minutes from April 7, 2026 were approved without edits (motion by Commissioner Coop, second by Commissioner Barberi, all in favor).
- Extension Request – Champlain Heights: Continued to June 2, 2026 at the applicant's request (motion by Commissioner Coop, second by Commissioner Exter, all in favor).
Public Comments & Testimony
- 20 Garter Drive (Reinstatement): No public comment in person or online; the applicant's attorney Robert Murray presented the request for reinstatement of the preliminary plan for a 201,000–232,000 sq ft industrial warehouse. The commission approved reinstatement.
- 1016 Park Avenue: Continuance granted to May 12, 2026 (motion by Commissioner Coop, second by Commissioner Lampier, all in favor).
- Vaughn Lane (RPD): Extensive public comment from abutters and residents:
- Jennifer Sutcliffe (171 Main St) raised concerns about boundary surveys, road alignment near her property, snow plow damage, and safety of driveway proximity.
- Robert Sansone (145 Main St) presented evidence of a drainage system not shown on plans, citing stormwater and downstream impacts.
- Sonia Meissenborg (30 Roberts Ave) discussed deforestation, habitat loss (black bear, birds), tree canopy goals, and impacts on wetlands and HOA maintenance.
- Dave Green (169 Main St) cited ledge issues and safety concerns with Road A's 47.6-ft right-of-way waiver.
- Jan (last name not given, Hope Rd) requested traffic study, noted Indian burial concerns (Nipmuck), and financial impact of 80+ students (estimated cost $1.596 million/year).
- Douglas (last name not given, abutter) emphasized fire and police coverage deficiencies, stating mutual aid is not reliable for daily service.
- Drake Patton (684 Natick Ave) questioned the need for Vaughn Lane connection, gate proposal, and lack of conservation easement for open space.
- Jessica Salter (6 Vaughn Lane) detailed concerns about traffic, ledge blasting, and phasing; requested a detailed phasing plan and fiscal impact analysis.
- City Councilman Richard Campbell Piano requested a fiscal impact statement.
- Abutter attorney Steven Slipole submitted prior memos and argued that the HOA structure must protect the city from infrastructure failure. He presented planning expert Brent Wiegand, who recommended a traffic study, geotechnical study, and phasing plan before master plan approval.
- 30 Ponemah Street (Zoning Recommendation): No public comment.
- Zero Fletcher Avenue (Zoning Recommendation): No public comment.
Discussion Items
- 20 Garter Drive Reinstatement: Staff presented five conditions consistent with the 2022 approval. The applicant confirmed a valid RIPDES permit extended to 2027. The commission approved reinstatement with conditions (motion by Commissioner Coop, second by Commissioner Mancini, all in favor).
- Vaughn Lane RPD (Master Plan): Applicant Tanessa Azar (Moses Ryan) and engineer Jenna Shea (DePrete Engineering) presented the 44-lot RPD on 91.6 acres, with 55.9 acres of open space (exceeding 21.4-acre requirement). Two waivers requested: 47.6-ft right-of-way (instead of 50 ft) on Road A, and waiver of sidewalks. Staff recommended approval with conditions including stormwater management, Vaughn Lane left unaltered, and a landscape plan. The applicant offered a gate on Vaughn Lane to limit traffic. Commissioner Lampier questioned the timing of waivers. After public comment and expert testimony, the commission decided to continue the matter to June 2, 2026, leaving public comment open, to allow time for review and to receive the applicant's written response to conditions proposed by the abutters' expert.
- Zoning Board Recommendations:
- 30 Ponemah Street (Mark Spirito): Proposal to build two new single-family homes on 3,200-sq-ft lots (6,000 required, median 4,500). Staff gave negative recommendation due to density (13.61 units/acre vs. FLUM 10.89) and incompatibility with neighborhood character. Commission voted unanimously for a negative recommendation (motion by Commissioner Lampier).
- Zero Fletcher Avenue (Gary Fletch): Request for use variance for motor vehicle storage on a lot across from M1 zone. Staff gave positive recommendation with conditions (stormwater and landscaping). Commission approved (motion by Commissioner Coop, second by Commissioner Barberi, 6-1 vote, Commissioner Lampier dissenting).
Key Outcomes
- 20 Garter Drive: Reinstated with conditions (carried over from original preliminary plan).
- Vaughn Lane RPD: Continued to June 2, 2026, meeting; public comment remains open. The applicant was asked to provide written acceptance or objections to conditions proposed by the abutters' expert.
- 30 Ponemah Street: Negative recommendation forwarded to Zoning Board.
- Zero Fletcher Avenue: Positive recommendation with conditions forwarded to Zoning Board.
- Special Meeting Scheduled: May 12, 2026, to handle the 1016 Park Avenue continuance and possibly comprehensive plan discussion (motion to schedule approved).
- Adjournment: Meeting adjourned at approximately 10:30 PM.
Meeting Transcript
Can everyone hear me? All right, I'm going to be calling this meeting to order. Um before we get to the first time on the agenda of approval of the minutes, I just want to say a couple of things quickly. Um, not on the agenda, but I don't think it's an open meeting issue. First, um I just uh as you may see, we do not have Director Ashman with us today. Uh there is a deaf and her family, and so I just want to wish her my condolences and uh first have a quick moment in silence and um because of that. Uh second, I'd like to welcome uh John Carlosante, who was appointed today as the newest member of the planning commission, Mr. Mr. Callasante is to my right for all of those of you watching on television and in the audience. Um Mr. Callisante is a small business owner. Uh he's currently I may leave a member of the historic district commission, and I'd like to welcome you to the uh he's replacing um Ms. Renzuli, who uh took a position with the administration earlier this year. So welcome aboard, Mr. Callisante, uh and and welcome to your first meeting. Thanks, Steve. Okay. First item, the agenda approval of the minutes. Is there any edits or changes to the approval of the minutes? I mean to the minutes that were submitted for April 7th. Okay, seeing none. Commissioner Coop makes a motion to approve the minutes. Is there a second? Second by Commissioner Barberi. All those in favor signify by saying aye. All those opposed to say nay. Ayes have it. Next is an extension request of Champlain Heights. Um Mr. Brogerman, my understanding is they have requested a continuance of the next meeting. Is that correct? Okay. Mr. Brookerman has indicated they requested a continuance. Can I have a motion to continue this to our next meeting in June, which is June 2nd? Moved by Commissioner Coop, seconded by Commissioner Exter. Any discussion? All those favor signify by saying aye. All those opposed say nay. Ayes have it. Next item on the agenda is the reinstatement request for 20 garter drive. I believe the attorney is here. Mr. Murray. Good evening, uh Robert Murray, 21 Garden City Drive and Cranston. I'm here tonight on behalf of uh guarded drive LLC, which is the new owner of the property at 20 Gard Drive, the former medium security uh prison facility that has since been uh raised since this process started. Um the new owners uh uh this commission approved about a 200,000 square foot uh industrial warehouse building for the site. Um I think it was two 210,000. Um the new owners have been um working with various uh builders and contractors, and the the size seems to fluctuate between 232,000 and 201,000, but they're they're closer to the 201,000 tonight. Um during this process, it became apparent uh that the uh preliminary plan uh was left to be uh expired without a request for an extension.
openpublica.com