The Cranston City Plan Commission met on September 1, 2026, from approximately 6:00 PM to 10:50 PM, including a five-minute break at 9:00 PM. The agenda included approvals of minutes, two subdivision applications, a stormwater ordinance recommendation, a pre-application informational session for a 12-unit affordable housing development on Hope Road, and several zoning board recommendations. Two items on state legislation changes were continued to the next meeting.
Um I talked to some of the people in the audiences gauge interest in the various items in the agenda. So the order will be call to order, approval of the minutes, 30 Ponham Street, 80 Phoenix Ave, the Stormwater Ordnance, then Hope Road, then the zoning board recommendations, and then finally this 2026 state legislation for both zoning ordinance and subdivision. If for some reason we cannot get done by eleven o'clock, I would assume we will not get to the state legislation for subdivision and ordinances, and that will be continued the next month. So if you're here for those, you may we may not be able to get to them. My apologies. So I'll start with call to order. I see a quorum present. First time the agenda's approval of anyone have any changes or amendments to the amendments. Seeing none, uh motion uh to approve would be in order. Commissioner Lampier makes a motion to approve. Second by Commissioner Mancini. Any discussion? All those in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed say nay. I have it. Next time the agenda will be going to 30 Palm Ham Street. Is the applicant here and wishes to be heard on the matter? Please come forward, state your name and address for the record. Mark Spiro 30 Palm Street, Consor and I want. Okay, Mr. Lima, is there someone raising their hand? Uh who's an attorney for the applicant on 30 Ponham Street. Uh no one is raising their hand if you want to instruct them. Oh no, it's it would be via uh zoom. I can do the okay. If you wish to proceed, we could also take you later. Yeah, no, I can do it. Okay, go ahead, sir. So it's a three lots. Sorry. It's uh three assessor lots at 3200 square feet each, and we are trying to um subdivide that into two 4800 square foot lots and create one house for the uh buildable and one to sit on the existing house. Pretty simple. And your let me just let me see. I believe you had an application earlier this year that was we did. We had one that uh was a little aggressive, and uh back here doing the right thing for the neighborhood, which I have my neighbor here. You'd like to speak and this survey is here also to talk if there's any questions for him. Okay, if I recall the application earlier this year, you're trying to build two more houses, so now you're just building one, right? Two houses, correct. Now it's just one house. And you would agree that um maybe the solicitor wants to, if I need to ask this, he would agree that he would only build one more house here. This would not be like he builds a house and then he comes back and asked for more relief and gets something else, right? We don't have to put some good condition about you could do that. You know, I I think uh first in this case, since it was denied um within a year. I think the first thing you need to do is um vote to see if it's a substantial change from the original application. Um if it is, then you can move forward on the merits of the application. Um you certainly can put the condition if agreed to by the applicant that there'll be no further subdivision. Okay. So I'm gonna go in reverse. Would you agree to a condition that there be no further subdivision to this property to add another house? I agree.