Good evening, everybody.

Good evening, good evening.

I'm calling the June 2nd, 2026 meeting to order at 7 p.m.

If everybody could please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance.

I'll ask our friend Sean to lead us, please.

I've clicked the Legends to the United States of America.

I'll ask Councilman Salvatore to lead us in prayer tonight.

Tonight we meet to serve our community to use our resources wisely and well to represent all members of our community fairly to make decisions that promote the common good.

We recognize our responsibility to the past and future and the rights and needs of both individuals and community.

As trusted servants, we seek blessings on our deliberations and in our efforts here today.

May we act wisely and well.

Amen.

Amen.

Thank you.

Madam Legislative Assistant, the roll, please.

Coalow.

Flanagan.

Present.

Holly.

Lepine.

Salvatore.

Usaid.

Gartner.

Faye.

Henry.

Wallace Smith.

Spain Reichel.

Yes.

Giordano.

Jabor.

Rotello.

Chinese.

Dwayne Perkins.

Britton.

McAllister.

Robinson.

Laughing House.

Dennis Perkins.

18 present, three absent.

Thank you.

We have a calendar of events that is posted, and I'll call your attention to some life events for the month.

For June 2026, we have anniversary of Councilman Ben Chianese, June 18th.

Congratulations, Councilman.

And we also have a birthday, Councilman Lou Giordano.

Happy birthday on June 20th.

Try to go through these quickly for you.

They are posted.

Every Wednesday through June 24th, we have the downtown Chowdown over in the little walkway between the Bardo Garage and Main Street, 11 30 to 1 30 p.m.

On June 4th, we have Jericho Partnership Power of Mentoring Luncheon, hosted by Jericho Partnership.

You can RSVP at JerichoPartnership.org slash events.

This is 11 15 at the Amber Room.

June 5th of Danbury Western Celebrity Breakfast hosted by Danbury Westerners.

You can RCP at Danbury Westerners.com 7 30 a.m.

Amber Room.

June 5th, Summer Concert Series, City Center Danbury.

Go to their website, CityCenter Danbury.com for more information.

This will happen on most Fridays, weather permitting, 7 p.m.

June 5th, we're going to do a flag raising here to celebrate and honor Pride Month, hosted by Danbury Pride and the Apex Community Center.

This is 11 a.m.

at Danbury City Hall Heritage Plaza.

June 6th, we have Connecticut Trails Day Cleanup.

Connecticut Forest and Parks Association and the Richter Park Authority in conjunction working over at 100 Anhack Road, 10 a.m.

to 1 p.m.

June 6th.

June 7th, the annual Portuguese Day Parade, hosted by the Portuguese Day Community.

Kicks off with the flag raising at 8.15 a.m.

at John at the John Perry Memorial, 9 a.m.

Holy Mass at the Immaculate Heart of Mary Church at 10.15 a.m.

The parade kicks off.

June 10th, we have the Lebanon American Club Scholarship Awards Center.

For more information, you can visit the Lebanon American Club at Danbury.com.

This is 6 30 p.m.

at the Amber Room.

June 11th, the Greater Danbury Chamber of Commerce holds their chamber awards.

You can go to Danbury Chamber.com for more information.

5 30 p.m.

at the Amber Room.

June 12th, the Filipino Independence Flag Raising.

This is hosted by the City of Danbury and Filipino American Association of Western Connecticut.

Flip the page here.

10 a.m.

City Hall.

June 13th, Flea Market and Crafts at the Danbury Recreation Department over at Hatters Park, 9 a.m.

to 4 p.m.

We're showing you guys a phenomenal job at this last year.

June 13th, the annual Danbury Street Fair, City Center Danbury.

This is Main Street.

June 19th, we have the Danbury Juneteenth celebration, hosted by the Juneteenth Coalition.

For more information, you can go to the WestCon website and get that information there.

This is 12 p.m.

to 5 p.m.

at the City Center Green.

June 22nd, honoring our veterans with Lieutenant Governor Susan Vicewitz.

The office of Lieutenant Governor and the City of Danbury will be honoring our Vietnam vets and Korean vets, I believe.

This is from 12 p.m.

to 5 p.m.

City Center Green.

I'm sorry, Rogers Park Middle School, 4 p.m.

Rogers Park Middle School, June 22nd.

June 27th, the annual Candle Lakes Firework.

This is hosted by the Danbury Volunteer Firefighters.

6 30 p.m.

Um obviously fireworks are at dusk.

Candlewood Town Park, as always.

June 28th, Lebanon American Day Ceremony, hosted by the City of Danbury and the Lebanon American Club, 12 p.m.

flag raising right outside at Heritage Plaza.

That is the calendar of events.

The first 30 minutes of the meeting are reserved for expressions and views, members of the public on items before the council today.

We ask that you speak at either one of those microphones that you're in the aisles.

State your name and address clearly for the record.

Are there any members of the public wishing to speak?

Any members of the public wishing to speak?

Any members of the public wishing to speak?

Mr.

Harold.

Sorry, at least I saw I'm pull up thing at first and then you.

So go ahead.

All right.

Y'all can flip a coin, but somebody's got to speak.

Okay, now I'm old.

Um Jeff Harold, Foster Street.

I'm here to speak on the appointment of two of the fire officers tonight.

Um I'd speak on all of them except a couple of them are so new to me, I don't even know who they are.

That's how long I've been gone.

So to keep that in mind, I'm sure they're fine and they're going to make great officers.

Um, but I'm speaking in on behalf of Chief Loungebury and uh Mr.

Ricard.

Um these gentlemen I worked with when I was in the department.

Um I I know them to be fine and upstanding and capable officers.

And I know too that the uh efforts that they have put forth show up in uh date what they do every day, and they will make our city better.

And I'm sure that the other officers that will be promoted tonight will do as well.

But for those two, I have a personal uh recommendation and I thank you for the time.

Thank you very much.

Thank you, Chief.

Lisa Lisa Scales.

Uh I live at Mountain Two Mountain View Terrace in Danbury.

Um good evening, and thank you for the opportunity to say a few words.

I am uh I rise to give some comments regarding the Connecticut Cultural District designation that's on the agenda tonight.

Um I serve as the executive director of the Cultural Alliance of Western Connecticut, a designated regional service organization through DECD and the Connecticut Office of the Arts.

I'm here in support of the proposed Danbury Cult uh Connecticut Cultural District District designation and as someone who um works closely with the arts and culture partners across Greater Danbury.

At its core, this designation is a recognize is about recognizing and strengthening what some strengthening something that already exists along the main street corridor.

We already have a meaningful concentration of arts, culture, history, and community activity.

The cultural district gives us a way to connect those assets together more intentionally, raise their visibility and build stronger sense of place in the heart of downtown.

This matters because art and culture are not separate from economic development and quality of life.

They are part of how people experience a city.

They help create energy, attract visitors, support local businesses, and make downtown feel active, welcoming, and worth investing in.

This designation also gives Danbury a framework for moving forward in a more coordinated way.

It provides a infrastructure, a container for planning, and it helps to align partners and support promotion and planning.

Build on a momentum that really is already underway through our related efforts in the city.

So I thank you.

Thank you, Ms.

Scales.

Any other members of the public wishing to speak?

Any other members of the public wishing to speak?

Any other members of the public wishing to speak?

CNN wheel club.

Sorry, I apologize, sir.

Uh Robert Aberhard at Six More Road.

I'm here to uh speak in favor of the reappointment of Pete Sizitsky to the Victor Park Authority.

I've been on a long time and Richter's at a crucial crossroads uh between the uh as for the golf course, the pump house and the irrigation system could go at any time, which would be major, major expense.

I know you're addressing that to the state.

Um Pete, I hate to say this because uh to offend any prior chairman, including myself.

Um Pete's been the best chairman in all my years.

Between his common sense, the way he conducts himself and the way he runs meetings, is beyond compare.

So I just ask you for this reappointment.

Thank you, sir.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Any other members of the public wishing to speak?

Any other members of the public wishing to speak?

Any other members of the public wishing to speak?

CNN, I will now close public speaking.

Uh I'll call on council or council president Peter Buzade for the minutes, please.

Thank you, Mr.

Mayor.

I move to receive the council minutes from the meeting on May 5th.

We have a reading of those minutes as all members of copies and copies are on file in the legislative assistance office and approved those minutes as they're presented.

Motion has been made, Secretary Councilman Dwayne Perkins.

Council, any remarks on the minutes?

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

See none, I'll charge your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

The vote is to order.

Councilman Salvatore, the consent calendar, please.

Consent calendar for June 2nd, 2026.

Item number six, I move to receive the communication and confirm the reappointment of Ryan Fucci as full member of the City Commission for Persons with Disabilities with a term expiration June 1st, 2029.

Item number seven, I move to receive the communication and confirm the reappointment of John Genteel Sr.

as a full member on the City of Commission for Persons with Disabilities with a term expiration of June 1st, 2029.

Item number eight, I move to receive the communication and confirm the reappointment of JP Shradinsky to the City of Danbury Aviation Commission for a term to expire June 1st, 2029.

Item number nine, I move to receive the communication and confirm the reappointment of John Cook II to the City of Danbury Cultural Commission for a term to expire June 1st, 2029.

Item number 10.

I move to receive the communication and confirm the reappointment of Peter Szyzinski to the City of Danbury, Stanley Lasker Richter Memorial Park Authority for a term that will expire on June 1st, 2029.

Item number 11, I move to receive the communication, accept the donation of $1,000 from Michael Scherer to support the program in relation to the DPDCU ice cream truck.

We ask that the legislative assistant send a note of thanks on behalf to the City Council.

Item number 15.

I move to receive the communication and approve the agreement with the Canadawood Lake Authority to store and/or repair its vessels in the airport maintenance hangar.

Item number 18, I move to receive the communication and approve the resolution as presented.

Item number 21, I move to receive the communication and approve the resolution as presented.

Item number 22, I move to receive the communication and approve the resolution as presented.

Item number 23, I move to receive the communication and approve the resolution as presented.

Council, are there any remarks?

Or any councilman Lepine?

Um we'd like to um take item number 10 off of consent.

Number nine, too, Frank.

Nine always.

Nine as well.

Okay, sir.

We'd like to remove number nine from consent.

Nine and ten will be removed from consent.

Nine and ten.

Thank you, Council.

No problem.

Item number one, please.

Communication appointment of fire chief.

Dear members of the City Council, I hereby submit for your confirmation the promotional appointment of acting fire chief William Lounesbury to the position of fire chief.

His appointment to this appointment is the culmination of an exceptional 35-year career with the City of Danbury Fire Department.

Beginning as a firefighter in October 1991, he steadily rose through every rank of the department.

Firefighter lieutenant in February 2003, captain in October 2012, Deputy Fire Chief in June 2018, and Assistant Fire Chief in August 2021.

He is currently serving as acting fire chief.

His tenured and successful career and service to this community are a testament to his integrity, ability, and lifelong commitment to the fire service.

In his role as assistant fire chief, acting chief Loudsbury managed a $21 million operating and capital budget, directed strategic planning and intricate coordination, and led a combined force of 130 career firefighters across five stations and 100 volunteer firefighters across seven stations.

Acting Chief Loungeberry is a graduate of the International Association of Fire Chiefs, Fire Service Executive Development Institute Cohort 10.

He holds NFPA certifications as a fire officer too and fire instructor too, along with Hazmat technician credentials, multiple technical rescue certifications, and a Connecticut EMT license.

He has shared his experience as a featured speaker at the UKG Telestaff Annual Conference and Fire Rescue International, and has served as a guest instructor in municipal workforce analytics and technology integration.

Acting Chief Loungebury's dedication has been recognized throughout his career.

He is the recipient of the American Red Cross Life Saving Award in 2012, the Firefighter of the Year Award in 2003, and 10 unit citations.

Outside of his demanding career, he is a passionate technologist and innovator.

He enjoys computer programming and operates his own 3D production laboratory, where he designs and prints custom parts.

He is an avid Zwift cyclist.

He rides in Danbury with his wife, Yasmeen, and he is the proud father of three adult children, two sons and a stepdaughter.

Acting Chief Loudsbury's personal and professional roots run deep in this city.

His unwavering commitment to excellence in public safety and his leadership, vision, and dedication to the Department of Residents of Danbury will serve this city well as he leads our department into its next chapter of excellence.

I'm proud and honored to submit this well-deserved promotion.

Sincerely, Roberto Alves, Mayor.

Thank you.

Council, what's your pleasure?

Councilman Salvatore.

I move to receive the communication and confirm the promotional appointment of acting fire chief William Loungebury to the position of fire chief for the City of Danbury.

Motion has been made, seconded by Councilman Dwayne Perkins.

Council, are there any remarks?

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

See none, I'll try your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

The vote is so ordered.

Congratulations.

Chief Loungebury.

A few words, Chief.

Thank you, Mr.

Mayor.

Thank you.

You gotta go with the microphones for the folks on video.

Come on.

Thank you, Mr.

Mayor.

Thank you to the council for approving me tonight.

Uh it's a real honor.

I have with me tonight my wife, Yasmin.

Uh we live in Danbury.

We've lived in Danbury a long time, so it's great to be finally to the level of chief.

Uh, I'd like to thank all my fellow firefighters or some other great officers being recognized for promotion tonight, so congratulations to them, and I look forward to leading this department in the future.

Thank you.

Thank you, Chief.

Congratulations.

I just want to point out as a volunteer that nominated you.

Item number two, please.

He's laughing.

Communication appointment of fire captain.

Dear members of the city council, I hereby submit for your confirmation the promotional appointment of fire lieutenant Sean Peltier to the position of fire captain.

He has served the Danbury Fire Department with distinction since February 2016, earning a promotion to lieutenant in March 2024.

Prior to joining the Danbury Fire Department, he served as a firefighter EMT with the Providence Fire Department.

Throughout his tenored career, he has served with a level of commitment, initiative, and reliability that has earned him respect within the department and among the fire service community.

He holds a Master of Public Administration degree from the University of New Haven and a Bachelor of Science degree in public safety administration with honors from Charter Oak State College.

His certifications are extensive and reflect a level of preparation and dedication that enriches the entire department.

These certifications include but are not limited to Firefighter 1 and 2, Pump and Aerial Driver Operator, Fire Officer 1, 2, and 3, Health and Safety Officer, Incident Safety Officer, Fire Service Instructor 1, 2, and 3, and Rescue Technician.

He has been recognized formally on multiple occasions.

He received the Danbury Fire Department Unit Citations in 2021 and 2025, Educational Achievement Awards in 2021 and 2024, and the Massachusetts Department of Fire Services Firefighter of the Year, Individual Meritorious Conduct Award in 2011.

Furthermore, he has achieved the rank of number one on the fire captain eligibility list.

In summary, his meaningful contributions, professionalism, and leadership present a level of expertise that combines field experience, academic achievement, technical certification, and structural leadership, and departmental recognition.

He will serve as an exemplary officer, and I am proud and honored to submit his confirmation for this well-deserved promotion to the position of fire captain.

Sincerely, Roberto Alves, Mayor.

Council, it's your pleasure.

Councilman McAllister.

Thank you, Your Honor.

I move to receive the communication and confirm the promotional appointment of Lieutenant Sean Peltier to the position of fire captain for the City of Danbury Fire Department.

Motion has been made, seconded by Councilman Salvatore.

Council with any remarks.

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

See not try your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

Congratulations.

There he is.

Come on up.

Come on.

Just a short 30 minutes.

No, I just want to say thank you to everyone.

Uh, obviously, thank you to the mayor and the council, to everyone that was involved in this process.

Uh, thank you especially to my wife, Colleen, uh, and congratulations to everyone else here tonight.

Thank you very much.

Dr.

All congratulations.

Item number three, please.

Communication appointment of fire captain.

Dear members of the City Council, I hereby submit for your confirmation the promotional appointment of fire lieutenant Dennis Ricard to the position of fire captain.

Since joining the Danbury Fire Department in September 2007, he has demonstrated an unwavering commitment to excellence in every aspect of his role.

Rising through the ranks, he was promoted to fire lieutenant in October 2020.

Prior to his career in the fire service, he spent 20 years working in the construction industry as an iron worker, a highly motivated leader and lifelong learner.

He has built a reputation for excellence in emergency operations, technical rescue, hazardous materials response, and the mentorship and development of fellow firefighters.

He holds a bachelor's degree in arson investigation, criminal justice from the University of New Haven.

A firm believer in the value of continuous education, he has pursued training opportunities throughout his career and holds an impressive array of certifications across multiple fire service disciplines, which include but are not limited to firefighter one and two, fire officer one, two, and three, CMC rope rescue operations one and two, heavy vehicle rescue, and trench rescue two.

Among his most notable achievements, he has received five unit citations for meritorious service during his tenure.

Furthermore, he has achieved the rank of number four on the fire captain eligibility list.

He is a committed, capable, and forward-thinking member of the department, and the city of the city and the department look forward to his continued contributions.

His promotion to the rank of fire captain represents the culmination of an extensive career defined by discipline service and discipline service and consistent pursuit of professional growth.

I am proud and honored to submit his confirmation of this well-deserved promotion to the position of fire captain.

Sincerely, Roberto Alves, Mayor.

Thank you.

Council, it's your pleasure.

Councilman Flanagan.

Thank you, Your Honor.

I move to receive the communication and confirm the promotional appointment of Lieutenant Dennis Rickard to the position of fire captain for the City of Danbury Fire Department.

Second.

Motion made, seconded by Councilwoman Faye.

Council with any remarks?

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

Yes.

I've known Dennis Rickard for many years now, personally and professionally, and I've always known him to be a upstanding citizen of the utmost regard.

And I know that he will always act in the city's best interest as a captain of our fire department.

Thank you.

Council, any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

Seeing none, I will try your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

Congratulations.

Well deserved.

Thank you, Mr.

Mayor.

Thank you, everybody.

Uh I find it a privilege to get to do my job and to work in the City of Danbury.

And um congratulations, Chief Lownsbury and my compatriots that are getting promoted today.

Uh thank you.

This is very humbling experience.

I'm usually not at a loss for words, as I'm sure the mayor could tell you from my interview that took like a half hour.

Uh thank you very much.

I appreciate it.

Congratulations, sir.

Item number four, please.

Communication appointment of fire lieutenant.

Dear members of the City Council, I hereby submit for your confirmation the promotional appointment of firefighter James Babcock to the position of fire lieutenant.

He began his career with the City of Danbury Fire Department in August 2018, bringing immediate dedication and strong worth work ethic to the department.

In the years since his appointment, he has consistently demonstrated a commitment to excellence in emergency response, fire suppression, and community protection.

He holds a bachelor's of science degree in fire protection engineering from the University of New Haven.

Additionally, he has pursued an impressive array of professional certifications, demonstrating a sustained commitment to skill development.

His certifications include, but are not limited to firefighter one and two, fire officer one and two, incident safety officer, fire service instructor one, and pump operator.

Furthermore, he is a proven leader who has stepped into significant roles beyond firefighting.

He is serving as political action driver for IAFF Local 801 since November 2024 and Strategic Communications Committee member for the Unified Professional Firefighters Association of Connecticut since February 2023.

He has achieved the rank of number one on the fire lieutenant eligibility list.

His promotion to fire lieutenant would be a natural and well-deserved progression and one that would undoubtedly benefit the City of Danbury and the Department.

He exemplifies the highest standards of professionalism, academic achievement, and civic commitment.

I am proud and honored to submit his confirmation for this promotion to the position of fire lieutenant.

Sincerely, Roberto Alves, Mayor.

Thank you, Council.

It's your pleasure.

Councilman Hawley.

Thank you, Ronor.

I move to receive the communication and confirm the promotional appointment of firefighter James Babcock to the position of fire lieutenant for the City of Danbury Fire Department.

Motion is made, seconded by Councilman Dwayne Perkins.

Council, are there any remarks?

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

See none, I'll try your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

The vote is so ordered.

Congratulations.

Vazy.

All right.

Thank you.

I want to thank Mayor Alves, Chief Lounsbury, City Council, for uh this opportunity.

I also want to thank uh my brothers and sisters from local 801 for their previous and continued support.

I also want to thank some other officials, Chief of Staff O'Brien, Representative Santos, Treasurer Jowdy, and uh thank you for this opportunity.

Congratulations.

Well deserved.

Item number five, please.

Communication appointment of fire lieutenant.

Dear members of the City Council, I hereby submit for your confirmation the promotional appointment of firefighter Mark de Grandis to the position of fire lieutenant.

He has proudly served the City of Danbury Fire Department since February 2018.

Over the course of his tenure, he has consistently proven himself to be a dedicated, disciplined, and highly capable member of his this department.

Prior to joining the fire service, he served as the director of financial reporting for Phoenix Insurance, where he developed a strong foundation and leadership and analytical thinking.

He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from University of Connecticut stores.

Additionally, he has invested significantly in his professional development within the fire service, with his many certifications, including but not limited to fire officer one and two, fire service instructor one, and firefighter one and two.

Beyond his operational duties, he actively contributes to the broader department community through multiple service roles, such as uniform committee member, awards committee member, and local 801 union board member.

Furthermore, he has achieved the rank of number one, number two on the fire lieutenant eligibility list.

In summary, he is a well-rounded proven professional who brings rigorous fire service training and an unwavering commitment to his colleagues and community.

His work ethic, professionalism, and passion for the fire service have earned the respect of his peers, officers, and the community.

He's he is very deserving of this promotion, and I am proud and honored to submit his confirmation to the position of fire lieutenant.

Sincerely, Roberto Alves, Mayor.

Thank you.

Council, it's your pleasure.

Councilwoman Lepine.

Thank you, Your Honor.

I move to receive the communication and confirm the promotional appointment of firefighter fighter Mark deGrandis to the position of fire lieutenant for the City of Dambury Fire Department.

Motion has been made, seconded by Councilman Salvatore.

Council, are there any remarks?

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

Seeing none, I'll try your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

The vote is so ordered.

Congratulations.

Your Honor, Mr.

Mayor, I'd like to thank you personally for this opportunity.

Uh Chief Lownsbury, I'd like to thank you as well.

Members of the council, I'd like to thank you for your consideration and confirmation for this promotion.

And I also want to thank uh my members here, my brothers and sisters of the fire department for their encouragement, their support along the way.

Without it, I undoubtedly wouldn't be here.

I'm super excited.

It's an honor to have this opportunity, and I'm looking forward to the next chapter of my career with the City of Danbury and the fire department.

So thank you very much.

Congratulations.

Before we move on to item uh number six on consent, I just want to rewind a little bit and have a vote to accept the consent calendar with the items removed.

Uh Councilman Salvatore, do you want to make a motion for that?

Make a motion and we accept the uh consent calendar with items nine and ten removed.

Motion is made, seconded by Councilman Tello.

Council, any remarks?

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

Seeing none, I'll try your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

Ayes have it.

The vote is so ordered.

Item number six, seven, and eight are on consent.

Item number nine, please.

Communication reappointment to the Cultural Commission.

Dear City Council members, I hereby submit for your confirmation the reappointment of the following individual to serve as a full member on the City of Danbury Cultural Commission, John Cook the second.

He should be reappointed to the Cultural Commission for his dedicated service, leadership, and longstanding commitment to arts and culture in Danbury.

Having served on the Commission for many years, including most recently as chairperson, John has worked diligently to preserve Danbury's rich history while expanding cultural opportunities throughout the community.

His passion for culture and the arts is self-evident, reflected in his thoughtful leadership and advocacy.

A retired school teacher, he devoted his professional life to educating and mentoring others, a commitment that continues through his service, civic service.

His experience, vision, and continued dedication make him exceptionally qualified to continue serving on the Cultural Commission.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, Roberto Alves, Mayor.

Council, it's your pleasure.

Councilman Salvatore.

I move to receive the communication and confirm the reappointment of John Cook the second to the City of Danbury Cultural Commission for a term to expire June 1st, 2029.

Motion is made, seconded by Councilman Chinese.

Council, any remarks?

Any Councilman McAllister.

Thank you, Your Honor.

Your Honor, I just wanted to take a minute to uh comment on the uh reappointment of John Cook to the uh commission.

Um my personal knowledge of Mr.

Cook you know just uh forces me to say something about what a great guy this is.

Um his commitment to the King Street neighborhood and all the organizations in King Street is is second to none.

His positive attitude about keeping the the North End of Danbury as well as the rest of the Danbury um under his continued care and outlook in a positive way is second to none.

We are very, very fortunate to have this individual reappointed tonight.

And I thank you, Your Honor, for the time to say that.

Thank you, Councilman.

Council, any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

Seeing none, I'll try your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

Votes so ordered.

Congratulations, Mr.

Cook.

Thank you for service at the city.

Just like to thank uh you, uh Mayor Alves for your support and uh all the members of the City Council for your support.

We're working very hard, and I couldn't do without all the other commissioners on the cultural commission.

Thank you.

Thank you, sir.

Item number 10, please.

Communication reappointment to the Richter Park Authority.

Dear City Council members, I hereby submit for your confirmation the reappointment of the following individual to serve as a full member on the City of Danbury Stanley Lasker Richter Memorial Park Authority.

Peter Szynski.

Mr.

Szyzinski would be reappointed to the stand should be reappointed to the Richard Park Authority for his exemplary service, leadership, and dedication to Danbury.

Having served on the authority most recently as chair, he has led with purpose and compassion while helping preserve and enhance one of Danbury's treasured public spaces spaces.

A former fire chief, he dedicated his adult life to public service and protecting Danbury residents with professionalism and integrity.

Even in retirement, he continues to give back to the community through civic involvement and leadership.

His experience, institutional knowledge, and continued commitment make him highly deserving of reappointment to the Richter Park Authority.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, Roberto Alves, Mayor.

Thank you, Council.

Council, it's your pleasure.

Councilman Salvatore.

I move to receive the communication and confirm the reappointment of Peter Szynski to the City of Danbury, Stanley Lasker Richter Memorial Park Authority for a term that will expire on June 1st, 2029.

Motions are made, seconded by I believe Councilman Chinese.

Council, there are any remarks?

Any remarks?

Any Councilman Giordano?

And thank you, Your Honor.

Um I just wanted to say uh um thank you to uh Peter for uh uh um uh appointing me to the uh board in uh January and um I've enjoyed uh working under your leadership there and I strongly support your uh reappointment uh as uh director thank you councilman councilman salvator can't say more than what was in the letter but I I've known Pete Szyzinski for a long time and if anybody can get this fat kid up a ladder during fire fire to one training uh that shows you the type of person that Pete Szyzinski is and he is great guy for the job and I'm glad he's being reappointed but he light a fire council any other remarks any other remarks any other remarks seeing none I'll try your minds all those in favor signify by saying aye any opposed the ayes have it the vote is to order congratulations please chief uh big night for Danbury Fire always humbled by the work that you all do and Frank your heart was as big as your body then so it was no problem at all thank you very much all of you thank you chief thank you sir items 11 and 12 uh 11 is on consent item number 12 please communication annual suspense lists pursuant to connected general statutes 12-165 I am submitting the annual suspense list for the city of Danbury please note that accounts transferring to the suspense lists are not abated and remain subject to collection the purpose of this transfer is to present a more accurate accounting of outstanding taxes for financial reporting and forecasting purposes the accounts recommended for transfer to the suspense list include those associated with taxpayers who are no longer in business are deceased or have relocated out of state I respectfully recommend the transfer of a total of 389,957 dollars and seventy one cents to the suspense list respectfully submitted Sean DeVaz tax collector thank you council with your pleasure councilwoman Gardner thank you your honor I move to receive the communication authorize the transfer of three hundred and eighty nine thousand nine hundred and fifty seven dollars seventy one cents to the suspense list motions made second by councilwoman LePine Council there any remarks any remarks any remarks seeing none I'll charge your minds all those in favor signify by saying aye any opposed have it the vote is so ordered item number 13 please communication appointment of audit firm honorable mayor and city council connecticut general statutes require the appointment of the independent auditor 30 days before the end of the fiscal year we issued a request for bid proposals for auditing services and only received one bid from RSM U.S.

LLP RSM has been the longstanding city's independent audit accounting services firm and their proposed fees are all in line with our last four audits as such I respectfully request that the city council approve the appointment of RSM as the city's independent auditors Dan Garrick Director of finance thank you council with your pleasure councilwoman LePine I move to receive the communication and approve the appointment of RSN US LP as the city's independent auditors motions made second seconded by councilman bench council any remarks any remarks any remarks seeing none I'll chal your minds all those in favor signify by saying aye any opposed the ayes have it the vote is so ordered item number 14 please communication application for water main extension at 15 Great Pasture Road Council with your pleasure council with your pleasure councilman salvator I move to receive the communication and refer this to the city engineer and planning commission for report back to the city council and further ask that this be sent to an ad hoc okay um we need a motion for the first part but not for the ad hoc correct yes all right so we'll do uh no but the the for the report yeah so I'll understand a motion for the report um all those in I'm sorry is there a second second second by councilman Chinese any remarks any remarks any remarks seeing none I'll try your minds on the report

I move to receive the communication and refer this to the city engineer and planning commission for report back to the city council and further ask that this be sent to an ad hoc.

Okay.

We need a motion for the first part, but not for the ad hoc, correct?

Yes.

All right.

So we'll do uh no, but the for the report.

Yeah.

So I'll understand a motion for the report.

Um all those in, I'm sorry.

Is there a second?

Second by Councilman Cheneys.

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

Seeing none, I'll try your minds and the report.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

That is so ordered.

The ad hoc will consist of Council President Peter Buzade in the chair, Councilwoman Claire Jabur, and Councilman Mike Henry.

Item number 15 is on consent.

Item number 16, please.

Resolution, Connecticut Cultural District Designation.

Honorable members of the City Council.

In partnership with the Cultural Alliance of Western Connecticut, I request your approval of the attached resolution that would allow Danbury to pursue official designation as a Connecticut cultural district.

This designation will formalize and elevate the vibrant arts, heritage, and cultural activity already present in Danbury while unlocking new opportunities for collaboration, investment, and visibility.

A cultural designation, district designation has the potential to strengthen Danbury's creative infrastructure, attract visitors to Danbury, foster community pride, and it will unlock access to state level resources, including grant opportunities and technical assistance.

Thank you for the your consideration.

Sincerely, Roberto Alves, Mayor.

Thank you.

Council, what's your pleasure?

Councilwoman Robinson.

Thank you, Mr.

Mayor.

I move to receive the communication and approve the resolution as presented.

What is made, seconded by Councilwoman Andrea Gardner.

Council, any remarks?

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

Councilman Rotello.

Thanks, Your Honor.

Just a quick question on procedure here.

It has nothing to do with the uh scope of the actual request.

But uh uh Attorney Castle Grandi, uh the last page, the last line actually of the uh resolution says execute all contracts, agreements, and other required documents and to take all necessary actions to effectuate the purposes of this application.

Um sure that this simply refers back to the process that's required to move this forward.

But yeah, I'm always hesitate.

I'm always in hesitation of of approving a contract that I haven't seen.

And in a situation like this, I'd normally send it to an ad hoc, but I'm not gonna do that tonight.

But I I I want your assurance that there's nothing untoward about these contracts, that nobody's gonna get into hot water that we're not committing the taxpayers in the community to something besides just moving this forward.

Is that generally the case?

And also, can we get a copy of the contract?

Thank you.

Well, if there are to the chair, uh there is my sorry yeah.

You just want to have the microphone, Paul's all.

There is no um contract that's before you.

This is simply as it reads, it's the authorization is to submit an application to become a state recognized cultural district and to execute all contracts, agreements, and other requirements that are and to take all necessary actions to effectuate the purpose of the application.

I would say any contract that comes before you would have to be approved by the council.

Okay.

So going forward, if they do any contracts, they would come back to us.

That's my understanding.

Okay, thank you.

No problem.

Councilman Perkins, you had a question?

I know.

Thank you, Ron.

Uh not necessarily a question, just a just a statement.

Um this has been a long time coming.

We we talked about this last night, and um many of us who are have been around for a while have been tech talking about this for actually decades.

So I'm glad to see this whole thing begin to come to uh some type of fruition.

You know, um it starts down nearby the Ives Center, which is right across from the Terry Wall Park.

Um, and I don't know if many of you know Charles I have spent a whole lot of time in that park.

You know, it goes on down Main Street past Marion Anderson.

I actually met Marion Anderson when I was a little boy in that store next door.

I can never remember the name of that store.

Uh down past the library, um the uh theater, um music center, turn the corner on White Street and up at the public library or um the museum for the train station.

So this isn't necessarily a direct line to financing, but what it is is an opportunity to make a case for why we are eligible for or could become eligible for grant opportunities and different types of um sourcing and and and planning and things like that.

So it also gets us on par with some of our neighboring uh communities, and this is a good thing.

So I'm glad to see this whole thing going forward.

Thanks, uh Director Scales, um uh representative uh Santos, mayor, mayor's chief of staff, all those who were involved in this, appreciate moving this whole thing forward.

Thank you.

Thank you, Councilman.

Councilman Hawley.

Thank you, Honor.

So I had I had the opportunity to actually assist with mapping and designing the uh this district.

And what became clear throughout that process was that Danbury already possesses a tremendous concentration of cultural, historical, and creative assets within that corridor we designed.

And uh this proposal was also informed through a public workshop where residents of the city of Danbury helped identify different cultural assets and they helped provide some input on the district's boundaries and characters.

So this uh resolution tonight is just one another part of the process, uh, but it's an important part of the larger uh project.

Um this approval would allow the city through the cultural commission to move forward with the application with the state of Connecticut for official cultural district designation, bringing visibility and opportunities for collaboration, promotion, and investment, and this effort will also closely align with our sustainable CT certification goals by certify uh by strengthening our uh social, cultural, and economic infrastructure that contributes to the vibrant and resilient community.

It also complements uh larger efforts that are going on to revitalize our downtown and supporting our economic development and uh strengthening Danbury's role as a regional arts and cultural hub.

So a lot of things are playing together here, and it's very uh encouraging to see.

And I just wanted to thank the Cultural Dimish uh Cultural Commission, my fellow members of the Cultural District Subcommittee, the Cultural Alliance of Western Connecticut City Staff and many residents who participated throughout the process.

We're almost there.

Thank you.

Thank you, Councilman.

Council, any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

See none, I'll charge your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

The vote is so ordered.

Item number 17, please.

Resolution, community development block grant program.

Honorable mayor and city council attached as a resolution that will allow the city of Danbury to approve and submit the city's community development block grant annual action plan for program year 52 and allow the city to apply for and accept funding totaling six hundred and two thousand two hundred and thirty-four dollars.

No local matches required.

Cara Prenti, Assistant Finance Director.

Thank you, Council.

What's your pleasure?

Councilman Britton.

Thank you, Your Honor.

I move to receive the communication and approve the resolution as presented.

Motion is made, seconded by Councilwoman Robinson.

Councilman, then any remarks?

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

Councilman Rutello.

Thanks, Your Honor.

On page 44 of this very um agenda item at the bottom, um, it says in addition to your jurisdiction, C D B G allocation for this year provides you with three million eleven.

Councilman Ritello, can I apologize?

Can you just angle the mic that makes it a little bit easier for all of us?

Thank you, sir.

Bottom of page 44.

Uh it it talks about um the availability of borrowing over three million dollars.

Section 108 permits you to borrow up to five times of your current CDBG allocation.

This loan allows jurisdictions to maximize access to low interest capital and provide long-term financing to invest in opportunity zones or further address gap financing for big projects that you envision for your community.

Now, three million is a lot of money.

That's actually more than than the city can borrow without having to go to the uh uh public uh in a bond.

So my query is who who is going to be in charge of this borrowing for anybody.

We're not borrowing.

We've never by the city, I don't think historically has never borrowed on this.

Um you're allowed to, we did once.

Okay, so now on their own.

Even though we're allowed to, there are no intention of borrowing.

That's good.

Yeah.

It's interesting though that they're they're giving us the opportunity to borrow that much.

It seems like a considerable amount.

It is.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Okay.

But you've this has come before the council every year.

Um it's been part of the CBG program.

I don't know if I will not say since its existence, because I was already just wrong once before.

Um, but I'm pretty sure it has been.

So every time the council is approved, uh, that has always been part of those approvals.

Yeah, but we're not we're not borrowing.

Yes, sir.

Council, any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

You know, I'll try your minds.

All those in favor signify by sign aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

The vote is so ordered.

18 is on consent.

Item number 19, please.

Resolution AIG FAA grant.

Honorable mayor and city council.

The City of Danbury's municipal airport has identified a funding opportunity through the Federal Aviation Administration Airport Infrastructure Grant.

The total the grant total shall not exceed $675,000.

The city share shall not exceed 33,750, and will come from the 2025-2026 bond issuance for this project.

Mike Zafrenik, Administrator Airport.

Thank you, Council.

It's your pleasure.

Councilman Flanagan.

Thank you, Your Honor.

I move to receive the communication and approve the resolution as it's presented.

Motion made, seconded by Councilwoman LePine.

Council, any remarks?

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

See none, I'll try your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

The vote is so ordered.

Item number 20, please.

Resolution AIP FAA grant.

Honorable mayor and city council.

The City of Danbury's municipal airport has identified a funding opportunity through the Federal Aviation Administration Airport Infrastructure Program.

The grant total shall not exceed 3,518,000.

The city share shall not exceed 135,900.

And will come from the 2005 2025-2026 bond issuance for this project.

Michael Stefrenick administrator airport.

Thank you.

Council, what's your pleasure?

Councilman Giordano?

Thank you, Mr.

Mayor.

I move to receive the communication and approve the resolution as presented.

Motion has been made, seconded by Councilman Chinese.

Council, are there any remarks?

Any remarks?

Councilman Rotello.

Thank you, Your Honor.

Is uh Director Sefranic here the case?

Yes, yes.

He was oh there you are.

Okay.

Mike, good to see you.

You know uh you're in the sixth ward with the airport.

Uh both Ben and I are big fans of the airport and had meetings with local people around the airport, some in favor, some are not, but we've always been big supporters and want the airport to succeed and to thrive.

I I noticed in this repaving issue that you're thinking about narrowing the width of the runway.

We went through this before with the um that runway was originally built 40 years ago and it was 100 feet wide, the current specs because it's considered a secondary runway at our designated airport as a general aviation, and the length of the runway does not have to be a hundred feet wide.

Now the FAA said to me, if you want to keep the other 25 feet, the city would have to pay for it.

I thought it was best to decrease it to 75 and not incur another $800,000 in paving costs and drainage and uh EPA and DEP and so forth costs for a runway we don't need to be that wide.

The city would have to pick up 100 percent of the extension.

They would have to pick up the difference in that 25 feet extra with all the extra costs that go with it.

Correct.

And you feel that this is gonna maintain safety on that wrong.

Very much so.

That extra 25 feet is negligible.

It's 12 feet either on either side because we're not decreasing it one side, it's 12 and a half feet on both.

And if you got the 75 feet, you should be okay.

And then finally, when do you think you'll all be done with this?

Uh we're looking to go in the bid in the next three, four weeks.

We're hoping to start the project breaking ground in September-ish.

We're gonna go 60 days, is what we're we're shooting for.

Um, I do want to note the FAA told us eight years ago this was never gonna happen.

They were never gonna get the money for it.

And after a lot of work, a lot of people had a lot of hands in this, they gave us 4.2 million.

And that's that's a big thing.

Okay.

We're not gonna fund that runway.

Let me take a moment to thank you for that and for the taxiway and for all the work that you are doing.

Um I'm well aware of the the occasional animosity between Boston and Danbury.

I get the appreciate it.

Thank you.

Thank you, Your Honor.

Yes, sir.

Council, any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

See none, I'll try your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

The vote is so ordered.

21223 are on consent.

Item number 24, please.

Uh call on yep, sorry, go ahead.

Resolution and report.

Ad hoc elected officials compensation.

Council President, you say it if you can read the minutes, please.

Mr.

Mayor, I move to waiver reading the ad hoc minutes as all members of copies and copies are on file in the legislative assistance office.

Motion is made, seconded by Councilman Rotello.

Council, just to remind you, this is on the minutes.

Are there any remarks?

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

See none, I will try your minds.

All those in favor signify on the minutes.

I do not have uh.

Any remarks on the minutes, Council McCallow?

Yes.

Yes, sir.

Just uh for the record, uh I asked for uh you know the salary data for the positions that are being proposed and then ad hoc, and I don't think I I know I haven't received them.

I don't know if anybody else in the council has.

Council, any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

Sorry.

On the minutes.

Yes, on the minutes, uh just because uh councilman Coello brought this up.

I will uh state I also noted that uh Councilman Coello asked for uh corporation council to provide confirmation that the restructuring didn't conflict with the city count uh charter.

And I don't believe that we ever received anything in that regard as well.

The resolution does impose the charges allows the council to fix the minutes of the uh town clerk.

Um the mayor uh and the treasurer, it's interesting because it's silent as to the treasurer, but it's been many years while uh the census council has fixed the compensation of the treasurer, so it's in my opinion it's a it's a common practice and and it's within your legislative discretion.

So there's express authority under the charter for the mayor and the town clerk, and I would say implied authority for the uh treasurer.

Thank you.

On the minutes, folks, any remarks on the minutes, on the minutes, on the minutes, you know, not trying your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

Council, what is your pleasure?

Councilman Joe Britton.

Thank you, Your Honor.

I move to receive the communication and accept the recommendation of the ad hoc to approve the resolution as presented, which will take effect after the next election.

Motion has been made and seconded by Councilman Rotello.

Council with any remarks.

Councilwoman Faye.

Thank you, Your Honor.

Um, I'd like to note that I believe the resolution is very poorly written.

And not only is it poorly written, but it's entirely vague and ambiguous on its face.

It states that all three positions, uh, the compensation should be adjusted annually to quote unquote reflect any changes.

It does not identify what those changes may be or what criteria any future administration should use and consider when making a salary change.

Are those changes in duties?

Are they changes in the economy or simply changes in a political climate?

Most importantly, I believe that the resolution as written violates both our state constitution and state statute.

Next, and more sensibly, it defies logic, and it's deeply offensive to the Danbury community.

Councilman Salvatore started this meeting in prayer, and he stated that we're all here to represent our community fairly.

Many residents are struggling to afford basic necessities.

Families consider continue to feel the impact of rising costs, and our students battle food insecurity, something that we hear about all the time.

Proposing such a significant increase sends the wrong message.

Public officials should lead by example.

When so many residents are making difficult financial sacrifices, awarding large salary increases to elected officials should not be a priority.

Public service should be guided by stewardship, responsibility, and the understanding of the challenges faced by the people we serve each day.

Advancing this proposal, despite the economic hardships, facing many residents demonstrates poor judgment and misplaced priorities.

The people of this city expect their leaders to put residents first.

This proposal does the opposite of that.

I would move that this resolution go back to the committee to be reconsidered and to be rewritten to comport with our state constitution and our state statutes.

Thank you.

Councilwoman Robinson.

Yeah, I mean, I I thank you for that, Councilwoman Faye.

I think this is no one on this council has any tone-deafness to what's going on in our economy right now.

I think it's really important to realize that this if if anybody gives themselves a raise, or if anybody allows this council to vote to give somebody a raise, it's going to be looked at as political.

This is not for this term, and this has not been done in many, many terms because everyone was afraid of it looking political.

I think the mayor, I I see people make 200, 300, 400,000 easily in this community, which I know is not for everybody, but there's a lot of people in this community that don't work half as many hours as the staff in this building does.

And I think it's unfortunate that somebody who that whoever the next mayor will be, who is the CEO of this city, and this is the seventh largest city in the state of Connecticut, and the current mayor's salaries and what the um not even the top 30 to 40 percent of what CEOs of each municipal of these municipalities make.

So I I just caution folks to think about take aside the political jargon for a second and think about what somebody's time is worth.

And we have a treasurer and a town clerk and a mayor who spend way more hours doing anything than a lot of folks that do their jobs in this community.

So this is still not comparable to other cities in our in our state.

And I think it's unfair to say that this large jump is a is astronomical based on the fact that prior administrations were afraid of raising their salaries specifically for this sort of optics.

So if you take a step back for a second and say if you want somebody good in this these positions who will do everything they can for this city, that we shouldn't have their salary be somewhat market rate.

Um, just keep that in mind when you think about the optics.

Thank you.

Council on either Councilman Rotello?

Yeah, I'm gonna have some remarks in a moment, but the first thing I want to get straightened out here is we have a motion on the floor.

Uh Councilwoman Fay made a motion to recommit this.

And I believe that was your motion, correct?

Second hand motion.

Okay, I'll second hand motion.

She moved.

She may move to recommit.

So we have a main motion that we're discussing, but now we have a secondary motion.

I just like to Is there a second?

Second the motion.

You'll second the motion.

Are there any remarks?

Any remarks?

Any remarks?

Seeing none, I'll chire minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

All right.

Any opposed?

Opposed.

The ayes have the nays have it.

Put us ordered back to the motion on the floor.

Okay, so that was the secondary motion.

Let's just be clear on the thing.

Now we're the main motion.

We've been through this on several occasions.

I I have voted in favor of raises for past mayors who happen to not be in my party, and I've been criticized by people in my party for voting for raises for mayors that weren't in their party.

I am now being criticized.

I was criticized today for supporting a raise for a mayor in my party by people in another party.

I'd like to make one thing clear.

This is not about the mayor.

This is about a procedure that we use in Danbury to run the city.

We're doing charter revision right now, and we could very easily recommend the Charter Revision Commission could very easily recommend converting the city of Danbury to a two-mayor system, which would be a sort of political figurehead for mayor and a city manager who would actually run the city.

And believe me, if we hired a city manager, it would cost a lot more money than what we're paying the mayor now.

And we'd still have to have a mayor.

He would be degreed.

He would have a square hat with a tassel on it.

He would have all of these things with a certificate out of the wizard of oz, and he would cost us a fortune, and he would not necessarily be any better than the current mayor that we had or the previous mayor or a mayor that we'll have in the future.

When you think about Danbury for just just a moment, we go into the community and we simply ask somebody, hey, do you want to be mayor?

And it may be somebody that we drink with, it may be somebody that we play baseball with.

It may be somebody that we hang out with, it may be somebody that works in a factory with us on the line.

And they run for mayor and they become mayor.

And in Danbury, they wind up being good mayors.

When you think about that, that's almost like going to a bar and saying, hey, listen, if you want to remove my cataract, raise your eye.

Raise your hand.

And a guy raises his hand because he buys you drinks all the time.

You'll say, okay, Joe, you get the job, and he turns out to be great at removing cataracts.

You would never consider that.

But that's what we do here in Danbury.

When Danbury was a smaller community, we had direct representation.

We would go out into a field and we would vote on stuff, but that's too complicated now.

There's too many people.

So what we have is an increasingly narrow pool of people who want to take this job.

People who are qualified enough to run this city, and we have been very lucky over the last hundred years that we've had very qualified people, and we have a very qualified person money the city now.

But people, believe me, people who are qualified to run this city are qualified to do a lot of other things that pay a lot more money.

And you get somebody who's speaking to a spouse and saying, hey, you know, I'm thinking about pivoting.

I want to get out of the corporate world and maybe give back to my community and do something a little bit more fulfilling spiritually.

I think it'd be a good lesson for the kids.

And I'm thinking about money for mayor of Danbury.

And the first thing they're going to say is, well, how are we going to put the kids through college?

How are we going to afford the mortgage?

Yeah, gee, honey, when you put it like that, I don't know, because it doesn't pay that well.

Maybe I'll just stick working for PepsiCo.

Not that there's anything wrong with PepsiCo, but I'm saying you got a guy who's really good at selling sugar water.

Turns out he's got skills to run departments, but he's not going to take the gig because it's not going to pay enough.

And that pool increasingly gets smaller and smaller.

You want your city to run well.

You want your groundless to increase.

You want your taxes to go down.

You don't want to pick up the newspaper or the social media every single day and read about mayors fighting with council people and town clerks suing treasurers and all the kinds of stuff that takes place in communities around Danbury that we see in other communities that don't need to be named, but we know all about them.

You want your city to be what I call drama-free Danbury.

And that does not come by accident.

That comes by a lot of skilled people pulling together and working.

And it starts at the top, it starts with the mayor.

Mayor's got a good team.

Mayor's got a great council.

Mayor's got some experienced council people, and mayor's got some new council people.

There's a lot of churn here.

But there always is this idea that we run Danbury soberly and robustly, and we do it for the benefit of the people of this city.

And we are painfully acutely aware of how much money it costs to run this city and the fact that we have this power of taxation.

We've talked about the suspense list.

We actually have the power to take a house or a car or a piece of office equipment, something that you depend on because you haven't paid your taxes because we made a decision on a mill rate that maybe you can't afford.

We know that.

It keeps me up at night.

And I want to make sure the city runs as efficiently as possible.

And one of the ways, not the only way, but one of the ways to ensure that is to make sure that our potential pool of mayoral candidates is large enough that the people of Danbury who have the ultimate decision on electing this person have a good enough and wide enough choice that they can pick out the best person, which will increase our odds of making sure that the city continues to run well.

So this is not, my vote is not about the current mayor.

It's not about the past mayor.

It's about the process.

And I I think we ought to be serious enough to realize that an increase in a mayor's salary, whether it's 2% or 20%, is money well spent, especially when you consider where he's coming from or she's coming from.

But also, and this is a critical point.

There's never done this before, to have a working living CPI built into this.

So that we don't five or ten or fifteen years ago wind up with inflation, and the stuff that's coming out of Washington is killing this economy.

I mean, you if you're if you're complaining about the economy, you have to look at what's happening in Washington.

Discussion for a different day.

But the fact of the matter is that if we don't put in some sort of automatic uh uh way of keeping parody with the raise that we're about to do, assuming that we do this, we're just gonna keep coming back and have these uh strained political discussions about we shouldn't do it, we should do it, whatever.

I say we bite the bullet, get it over with, try it out, see if it works.

I happen to know it's gonna work.

If it doesn't work, we can come back and make an adjustment.

But I think it's high time that we do this instead of every two, three, four, five, six years, say, well, it's been a really long time, let's give the guy a raise.

Let's just do this and make it just a little bit more professional and make it a little bit more apparent to people outside who might be considering taking this gig that there may be something in it as well as a spiritual component and an interesting component.

There may also be a way to get through life with the money that's coming in from the city, which right now at the moment is making it very difficult for somebody who's qualified as Mayor Elves or Mayor Bowton or uh Mayor uh Erequest.

Do something along those lines.

It's it will never match what these people can earn in the private sector.

This is this is nobody in the private sector is gonna leave their job at Coca-Cola and say I'm gonna become mayor of Denver because it pays so well.

It's never gonna happen.

It never happened.

But they might some of them might say, you know what?

I think I'm gonna take a shot in doing this.

We're it's gonna be tighten our belts.

We can still put the kids through school, we can still do this, and we can get those qualified people in a in a pool that gets bigger and bigger.

That's why I'm voting for this tonight.

It's not for me, and it's not for mayor, but it's for the people of Danbury.

Thank you.

Councilman Giordano?

Thank you.

Thank you, Mr.

Mayor.

Um this question is uh directed to corporation council uh through the chair.

Um could you please uh comment on uh um councilman fee's um uh statement that the uh um the resolution is uh not in uh compliance with the state laws and the city charter.

Chair.

I disagree.

I believe it's clearly your phone, corporation council, please.

I believe it's clearly in compliance with applicable uh state law.

And it's also within the home rule powers of Dan Burry as a charter town.

Thank you for that clarification.

Council, there any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

Councilman Faye, second time?

Uh yes, it's a question for corporation council, if I may.

Um You would agree that no public official public officer employee can um take a raise in that term, correct?

Correct.

That's what the statute says, yes.

Okay.

And the current term for mayor, town clerk, um, and uh treasurer, which are the three positions addressed here, are two-year terms, correct?

Correct.

And yet the resolution says that it should be adjusted annually.

That would violate state constitution and state statute if it were to occur annually, correct?

No, I uh I I don't I don't I don't believe so.

You're you're putting in place a mechanism uh whereby uh there's an automatic increase uh as a result of this action.

So I I I don't I don't have the statute in front of me, but I don't um I don't agree with your interpretation.

So under your reading of the state constitution and the state statutes, automatic increases for public officials are allowed.

This isn't this is not an automatic increase.

This is a legislative decision.

Right.

So what's I'm just asking for clarification.

So what's in front of us tonight as a resolution would be a legislative decision.

But if it were to be an automatic trigger that it was annually reviewed, not coming before this legislative body, it would violate stat state statute and our state Article 11 of our state statute, correct?

I don't I don't believe it would.

I can certainly uh uh talk to you offline.

Uh we can talk more about it.

But I I I believe the council has a discretion to adopt this resolution.

With an automatic mechanism to increase salaries for elected officials.

Yes.

Councilman Hawley.

Thank you, Your Honor.

So I support this resolution because it's actually creating a structure for an elected official's compensation.

Um this has not been handled in the past because it's an iffy issue when you're actually passing a motion to change elected officials' um salaries.

So if we create a resolution that actually creates a structure and a method behind this, one, it takes the politics a little bit out of it.

And then two, it's also creating a better planning mechanism for a municipality to use.

So that way we can be better stewards of our taxpayer monies if we know exactly what the salaries are.

We see this with our teachers.

We see this with our union employees, where there's built-in cost of living adjustments built into the budget every year.

This is a better way to manage our municipal uh finances.

And uh another point I would like to add to this discussion is uh myself and councilman Britton.

We actually went back to the record going only back to 1990.

I wanted to go back to 1965 with consolidation of all the mayor's salaries and when they were adjusted and kind of how the council did that, but only got to 1990.

And uh what you saw in those uh records was during electionears, the municipal uh CEO's salary was not adjusted.

The tax rate might have changed, uh, but the municipal CEO's uh salary did not change.

And then in years where it was not an election, the tax rate maybe didn't change, but the municipal CEO's salary changed.

It never went down.

Um it is just a weird way to be paying the people that serve our city and the people that are in positions of public trust if we're not giving them a structure for them to adequately do their job and plan for their own lives.

And uh last piece I would kind of add on here too.

Is that even if this does pass, the municipal CEO salary will not even be in our top ten of our salaries.

There are many other public servants that are dutily serving our city day in and day out that make more than this, and they earn them those funds.

But they work just as hard as anybody else in our municipality because we are a community of people that work together.

So, yeah, and last thing I'll throw on here, too.

I'm a little iffy about pegging it to the percentages uh the town clerk to the mayor, but this is a resolution.

If this does not work, this council maintains the control to adjust this as needed.

So I will be supporting this motion tonight.

Thank you, Councilman Holly.

Councilman Cuello.

Thank you, Your Honor.

Uh the question before us is not whether these positions are important, because I think we all know that they are.

Um my opinion, the question is whether now is the right time to substantially increase the compensation for these elected officials.

I don't believe the average taxpayer in damage receiving a 20 percent raise.

I don't believe the act the average retiree living on a fixed income is receiving a 20 percent raise.

I don't believe many small business owners that drive the economy in this city are seeing a 20 percent um increase in their income.

Um therefore I can't justify asking taxpayers to fund increases for elected officials that far exceed what many of them are receiving themselves.

Again, my vote is not a reflection on any individual.

It's a reflection of my belief that the elected officials should be held to the same financial realities as the taxpayers we represent.

At the time when many Danbury families are struggling with rising costs and are being asked to do more with less.

I believe approving a significant salary increase and automatic future increases for our elected officials sends them the wrong message.

And for those reasons, I'm voting no.

Thank you.

Thank you, Councilman Coolo.

Councilman Chinese.

Thank you, Your Honor.

I know it was said before, you know, because of being on the council for many years.

I did go back myself and look at this mayor's salary over the time.

And over the time we did get three percent arrays every two years, but there were some times when the mayor did not take a salary for whatever reason.

But if those salaries were kept all the years, I think the salary would be around the 165 that we're projecting now.

So I think the number that is there is correct.

But I did look up on state statute.

I think Section 7460 does say that the legislative body may fix the compensation of its elected officials.

So we are in compliance of state statute, because it is there in state statute that we can do so.

But I just want to point the fact that, you know, we've lost a very good town clerk many years ago.

And one of the reasons why we lost that person is because the salary wasn't comparable to her own staff.

I mean, she the person worked full-time, but her but the assistant town clerk is what I'm talking about, got paid more than the town clerk because the union union negotiations.

So over the years, the the person wound up leaving the city of Denver to go to the town of Wilton primarily because the salary did not meet her needs.

And we did lose her.

And she was a very good town clerk.

If we had an adequate salary in place, we never would have lost her.

So I think we really need to look at our salaries that they are compatible with with so with surrounding towns, because we are in competition.

You know, we we tonight we uh we promoted a very good um fire chief here.

And I can guarantee you his services is well needed for all the towns, we'll love to take them away from us.

So if our salaries weren't compatible, comparable.

We would lose not just a good fire chief, but we could lose a very good uh police chief, and we again we already lost a very good town clerk.

We got to maintain the people that we have.

And the only way we can really do that is by setting the salaries that are comparable to other municipalities.

Otherwise, we can wind up losing our own finance director as well.

I mean, we our salaries gotta be compatible with others.

And what we're doing here tonight is just making our elected officials, the mayor's office, this treasurer, and the town clerk compatible to our surrounding towns.

Councilman Rotel said it before.

If we had a town manager, it would be well over 200,000 a year.

And if you look in if you look at the numbers, which I have done, you get small towns.

I forgot what town it was, 20,000, 30,000 per population town, the town manager made over 200,000 a year.

And here we have a population of 90 plus thousand people, and our mayor is what making 143,000 a year.

It's not a compatible salary, and it really needs to be based on our population and the amount of work or our work that we expect from our mayor.

It's not a nine to five job.

It's a 24-7 job.

He I can get I can see it as every day.

He's he's always doing something.

And the town and even the treasurer, you know, he's they're always doing something.

I'm sure the finance director here can tell how hard our treasurer works.

And and yet just look at what's happening in the town of New Britain.

What's going on there?

Right.

So if and if we didn't have proper people, that can happen here.

So we have experienced people.

I think we have to maintain our experience, and the only way to keep that is by giving them a compatible salary that's going to want them to be part of the city of Danbury.

Thank you, Your Honor.

And I'll be supporting the resolution.

And also, by the way, it's also subject to budget approval.

So even though we're approving this tonight, it still has to be placed in the budget come next year to approve by this council again.

So even though we approve it, the mayor may say, hey, I don't want to put it in the budget.

He doesn't have to.

So there is still other bites at the apple.

This is only a resolution as a recommendation.

It could be changed.

So thank you, Your Honor.

Thank you.

Councilwoman LePine.

Thank you, Your Honor.

I'd like to bring up the fact that the Dantbury School Superintendent, Carrot Casabure, makes uh $25,000.

I'm pretty sure that's the right number plus the stipend and uh the current mayor's salary is $135,000.

Correct me if I'm wrong on those numbers.

Um the point is too that the mayor doesn't get that now.

When she gets a raise, you know, and she's a superintendent of school.

I think that the mayor's job is as big or bigger.

And uh I just like to point that out.

Thank you.

Thank you, Councilwoman Lepine.

Councilwoman uh Gardner first, please.

Uh thank you, Mr.

Mayor.

Um, I'm just gonna be brief and make the point that um I see this more as an effort as your administration and your team at City Hall continues to um look at the uh inconsistencies in our local government um with transparency and best practices.

Um this implementation of this resolution is 18 months away.

We don't know who it's going to benefit.

And if you if you think that that's um you know a far-fetched idea, keep in mind that 18 months ago was early December 2024.

And things are different.

We have no way to predict what our uh our circumstances will be 18 months from now.

So I see this in the light of um best practices, transparency, and making Danbury um competitive so that the best people can run the city.

Thank you.

Councilwoman Robinson.

Thank you.

Um just very quickly, because I think I think it's important to acknowledge that the statement that this violates um our state charter or uh state statutes in any way, shape, or form.

I think the two important things to think about are A, again, this is not happening in the middle of the term.

Um, and B, this is setting up a mechanism, not necessarily um an ongoing um change in salaries.

I pretty sure, and I don't quote me on this, but I'm pretty sure anyone on a fixed income that receives Social Security or other federal benefits gets a cost of living adjustment based on um the federal calculation of what COLA is that year.

Um I I don't think it's fair to really sit here and say building uh cost of living adjustments is is somehow violating um or our fix or not fixing salary going forward.

We're putting in place a mechanism that says a set salary and then had cost of living adjustments, which is pretty much the same as probably um 80 to 90 percent of of most workers out there in private and in in municipal practice.

Um so I just want to be very clear.

I think based on the state statute that we are setting a resolution for a fixed number and then an incremental increase, which is not raising somebody's salary in the middle of a term that is being refixed in any way, shape shape or form.

This is a mechanism, um, not a salary vote in the middle of somebody's term.

Um and then the other thing I just wanted to say again is that the amount of years that have gone by without a cost of living adjustment, I think it is relevant to say, you know, stop sitting here and looking at this as a 20 percent increase.

I know that this is gonna this is gonna be what what fodder is gonna be, but this is because we've been neglectful for so many years.

Um and it doesn't matter whose fault it is or why, but this is something that anybody who hasn't a job that works should be given a cost of living allowance based on on what's going on in the economy.

So I think that the recognition of everybody sitting up here is that we're not in our own um glass house here, not realizing what's going on out there, but we think everybody should have a fair wage, and I think that the mayor should have a fair wage.

Um and I don't think that he should be judged just because he's an elected role.

Um this is about a fair wage.

So thank you.

Council, do you have the remarks?

Any other remarks?

Any other remarks?

Councilman Henry.

Thank you, Honor.

Um looking at the considering it to be an automatic raise, all our departments in the City of Danbury teachers all have to negotiate their salaries.

And that's every three years.

There's nothing automatic about it.

Just a comment on a record for you.

Thank you.

Thank you, Councilman.

Councilman Peter Buzade, Council President to close this out.

Thank you, Mr.

Mayor.

Um when this uh proposal uh I apologize.

When this when this proposal was first presented at the ad hoc, I did take the time to look at um the applicable law.

And I believe the applicable law is actually found in the State Constitution in Article 11 as amended.

In particular, it's in Section 2.

And what it talks about there is setting compensation.

And once compensation has to be set prior to the beginning of a of an elected official's term, that's what we're doing.

We're setting the compensation uh for any mayor, treasurer, or town clerk who is going to be elected uh and take office in December 1st of 2027, whoever that may be.

Uh this clearly, in my opinion, uh comports with the requirements of Article 11, Section 2 as amended in 1982, because this is setting the compensation.

We're not going to reset it.

We can't reset compensation.

We couldn't sit here tonight and pass a resolution raising Mayor Alves's salary that effective any time during his term, but we can do it for the mayor who takes office on December 1st or the beginning of December 2027.

I I strongly believe this makes sense.

I strongly believe that it benefits the City of Danbury and all of its residents to have a mayor who is making adequate compensation.

It will broaden the pool, as was mentioned earlier, of potential people who are going to run and be able to perform their duties and a decent salary.

I support this.

Thank you.

Thank you, Council.

President Busade.

Council, I'll now try your minds.

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

Two three.

It's a voice vote, so I gotta give me a voice on that one, Mike.

The ayes have it, the vote is so ordered.

Item number 25, please.

Department reports.

Mr.

Mayor.

Mr.

Mayor, I'm I move to waive reading the reports has all members of copies and copies are on file with the legislative assistance office, as well as accept those reports as they are presented.

Motion is made and seconded by Councilman Dwayne Perkins.

Council, uh, are there any comments or questions, remarks for department heads?

Councilman Salvatore.

Good evening, everyone.

How are you doing?

I know there's been a lot of discussions on the detour on top field due to the uh Franklin Street bridge construction and the utility work over there.

I know how diligent you and the department are in the decisions you make.

My question to you is are there any other opportunities for other detour routes?

Uh having been up there recently, I didn't see any.

Um, public works and engineering, uh you know, make the recommendations for the uh detours, and um you know we go with that unless we do see another option, and right now I do not see another option.

Um I mean, once the work is done on Westville, we'll re-evaluate and uh see if there is another option.

And if there is, then uh we'll work together to uh to do to make any adjustments, but uh no promises at this point.

Thank you.

Thank you, Chief.

Councilman Tello, you had your hands up?

Uh thank you, uh, Your Honor.

Um a year ago we entered into a contract with a company called Bus Patrol.

Do you need the Chief uh councilman?

I don't wonder if Mr.

Vecch Lam say do you need Rittenhauer or somebody else?

Just I just want to confirm a figure.

Uh uh we have 477 citations were issued under departmental reports for the butt the bus thing.

Is that an accurate figure?

Yes.

Okay, thank you.

My next comment is through uh the chair to our corporation council.

So a year ago we did this.

We approved a contract with a company called Bus Patrol to install cameras at their expense, kind of our expense or expense.

And we had a three-year, I believe a three-year contract with a uh an opt-out at the end of the three-year period.

Um, in case we weren't happy with the contract, and in that time, you know, if I get any closer to this microphone, it's gonna be in my nose.

You guys really can't hear me?

There it is.

Yeah, only holy smokes.

Okay.

So we enter into the contract.

Um we have been I guess I uh I don't want to say we because I don't want to steal Director Sopranic's thunder, but Director Sopranic has been doing the heavy lifting.

This is one of those deals where, unlike what we are supposed to do in the Constitution, you know, you're innocent until proven guilty.

The people who come to us after they've gotten a ticket have to prove their innocence.

And Director Sopranic working under those very weird conditions has done an admirable job.

My concern a year ago was not with the program.

My concern was about an indirect knockoff that these cameras could be used to surveil our citizens.

And I was so concerned about that that I demanded and received assurances from corporation counsel that that could not be the case.

I actually got a letter from uh uh one of the uh staff attorneys for uh attorney Castle Grandi's firm who wrote to me right to me, he wrote also to the entire council, and he said either party can terminate the contract for cause.

These are his um uh highlights at any time.

I mentioned this is this is the uh this is the attorney, uh Joseph Mortonelli.

I mentioned this as I understand certain council members inquired about the contract's language regarding data protection.

That would be me.

Please be advised that under the contract, all video, images, audio, and other data generated by bus patrol's cameras will only be disseminated to authorized personnel within the city and will not be made available to any third party unless explicitly authorized by the city.

The extent permitted by law, bus patrol reserves the right to utilize captured imaging and other data from its cameras for educational and marketing purposes, provided that the identity of the city is not revealed and the identities of the city's school children are protected as required by law.

In bold, if this clause is breached, the city can terminate with cause immediately.

Immediately, if I was off mic on that one.

So that's our escape hatch.

Now a large media outfit called uh uh 404 Media has been investigating this, and they found out that Bus Patrol has put AI cameras in tens of thousands of school buses, and now they want to give cops access.

They have nothing against cops.

But Bus Patrol has already taken steps to share the collected data with law enforcement contracting giant acson.

Internally, Bus Patrol has acknowledged how controversial is plan to collect and share this data is pointing specifically to concerns about ice using license plate data, but emphasizes the likely success of selling this angle of protecting children.

That's their umbrella.

Keep the children safe.

I don't know about you, but it just from personal experience over the last couple of years.

I think families may have more risk of losing their kids to ice than they do to having them get hit by a bus.

So what we've got here, uh we've we've got a company that's turning our school buses.

Everybody smiles when they see a school bus.

I mean, there's TV shows about happy buses, and now we've got buses that are going to surveil every without warrant, every single car in Danbury, all the time.

Not when the stop signs up, but all the time.

And they're gonna sell this data to Axon, and this data is gonna be sold to ICE and the FBI.

The FBI has already expressed interest in this.

This is my primary fear, and the reason I almost didn't vote for this.

But I was convinced.

The city convinced me, tried to convince me that this could not happen, and if it did happen, we could get out of the contract.

So I've got these documents right here, some articles in the paper.

I'm gonna hand them to corporation counsel.

What I would like to have, and I don't know if this is true, just because it's in the newspaper and a media outlet doesn't make it so.

I would like to find out if it is so, and then I would like to find out an avenue to at least protect the people of Danbury or to get out of this contract.

And if we want to stay in the bus camera business, find another vendor that's gonna protect our people from unwarranted and as far as I'm concerned, illegal searches.

Thank you, Your Honor.

Thank you, Councilman Ellett.

Uh Mr.

Sefranik opine a bit on this.

I know you've worked very closely.

Thank you, Mr.

Mayor, and I will try to address your questions and your concerns.

Um I do understand where you're coming from.

So uh being the the administrator, the uh citation hearing officer, the way this system works is the video is only used when a violation occurs.

And then it goes to a police officer to review, and he only reviews that car in that specific situation, and the video gets archived.

It does not get used anywhere else.

Uh the individual who gets the citation can view only his or her own citation, where I myself have the access to um all the video because I'm the the judicial hearing officer in this sense.

But my experience has been 100 percent that that video is only used for that specific citation and nowhere else.

I can't even pull up a video randomly.

It has to be tied to a citation.

So let's say you know somebody had a citation like yourself or Mr.

Geneese had a citation.

I could only pull his video with that specific, and what makes it even more um uh foolproof in a sense, if you will, is it only shows a small snippet.

I don't get five minutes before the incident or five minutes after.

It's usually about maybe five seconds before the incident of the the vehicle passing through the school bus zone, and maybe four or five seconds afterwards.

As a matter of fact, the complaint from some people is well, you didn't see you know the whole 30 minutes.

And like, well, we don't have 30 minutes to look at just yours.

I got 40 people behind you to look at their 30 minutes also.

Um so that's my first hand interpretation of how the system is working.

And it it's that's all we have access to.

If I can respond?

Yes.

According to this, they're changing that.

Let me just read it.

According to who, sir.

I'm sorry.

According to the this investigation of bus patrol.

Okay, but is it of Danbury's bus patrol?

That was that's something I would ask.

All of them.

Okay.

I I can't comment on something I don't know.

Can I ask questions?

Let me just say this.

The plan changes would dramatically expand the system to scan the license plates of all vehicles the buses passed.

According to who, regardless of the media that's I I've never heard of 404 media.

If you have a question for our corporation counsel on this, right, can you respond to you?

Mike, Mike is Mike is saying that under the current system, and we know what the current system is.

Correct.

This article, their internal documents, which which the company has not disputed.

Their internal documents are saying that with a new investor they're going to increase revenue by selling this data to law enforcement.

But see, in the opinion, being the administrator of this, that would change the terms and conditions of the contract, and as soon as they do that, they haven't yet.

If they ever didn't, we'll let the attorneys opine out of the way.

I apologize.

I like to opine.

No, no, I appreciate that.

Thank you, sir.

That's my point.

That's my point.

That if this went into effect, it would change the term of the contract.

But not being an attorney, I'm handing this off to corporation counsel to find out A, if this is true, and B, if it is true, does it change the terms?

That's discussion.

That's all I have.

Thank you, Councilman.

Councilman Perkins?

Dennis Perkins.

Thank you, Anna.

Uh, please change what now.

How are you doing, Chief?

Now there is a question after this.

I'm fascinated by this.

You have three gangs in Jacksonville, Florida.

And one of these gang members has a following of tens of millions of uh of people.

He f he he puts on social media, come celebrate with me in Tampa, Florida, my birthday, my 26th birthday.

His enemies saw that post.

They traveled from Jacksonville, Florida all the way to Tampa.

They surveilled them, they followed them, they watched him, uh, to three different clubs.

He went to his hotel where he was turned away because the rooms was um was let go because he came too late.

The surveillance car came into the parking lot.

Three minutes later, the killers came into the park a lot.

Long story short, they assassinated him right in the parking lot.

The Tesla turned on, the camera turned on, and it videoed the killing right there in live action.

They they solved this case in three days because of cameras on the highway, cameras in Tampa.

They put everything together and they arrested those individuals from 18 or 18 years old to 20, highly coordinated hit.

They had them in custody in three days because of rain cameras, uh cameras on the highway, cameras in Tampa.

So my question to you is do our Great City of Danbury, do we have that that type of technology with cameras?

If we do, how many cameras do we have?

And are we solving crimes?

Because they would never solve they would not have ever solved that crime without those cameras.

So do we have that type of technology right here in Danbury?

Well, I'm not going to comment on all of the uh technology that we have available to us, but as you also mentioned, though, that there were ring cameras, there was others that so I mean a lot of our residents have cameras that if they allow us access, there's a uh a portal that they can do so.

Uh and we do have partnerships with our other uh state agencies to uh look at cameras along uh certain routes.

But uh, you know, for investigative techniques, I'm certainly not going to um you know reveal everything that we have, but we do have a lot of tools available to us, and uh our solvature rate is uh pretty good uh amongst our investigators.

Um and we're doing the best that we can again to uh keep our city safe.

So we do have cameras in Danbury that is silent crimes in Danby right now.

We have access to technology that we are solving crimes in Danbury.

Um as you as you see, uh a lot of arrests are made uh here, and we're doing the best we can to uh make sure that we don't have some of the issues that some of our other communities have.

Uh thank uh please chief.

Thank you.

Councilman Faye.

Good evening, good evening.

Um this is a follow-up to Councilman Salvatore's uh line of questioning regarding Topfield and Westville Avenue.

Um again, a lot of us have been following that issue in depth.

And my question is in the future, when there is a detour necessary due to a construction of planned event, would it be possible for Department of Public Works to coordinate with the police department to um post the detour that will be taking place?

Um similar similar to something like when there's a 5K.

We all have you know the flyers in our neighborhood five closed on Sunday, something like that, um, so that the neighborhood could adequately prepare and plan for that detour.

Sure.

I mean that's that's always possible.

I'm not sure that that wasn't done in this case.

Antonio, you already do that.

Thank you.

So perhaps you could tell us what was done in this instance.

Maybe it's not a question for the chief.

I apologize.

No, no, it's okay.

No problem, sir.

If you can come up to the microphone, we'll get the question asked again.

Maybe what is this question now?

So what my question was asking if we could do more neighborhood preparedness in notifying the neighbors of what the detour would be, what roads would be closed, so that um not just the people who travel to the neighborhood, but the people who live in the neighborhood would know how to plan for the days, weeks, perhaps months to come.

I think that you said that you did this in this that's correct.

We work with the mayor's office Jason had all the detours was posted.

Pretty much what we did in Frank with Kennedy Avenue that we just started.

On the Internet I I'm I'm assuming on social media.

So my question is specifically I think you did a call out to residents.

On the microphone if we uh just want to answer back my question is specifically could we just put up posters, little flyers, signs, something we put up signs.

We put verbal message signs up.

I don't know what else you can do you want to we can certainly see if there's other opportunities.

What I would just want to say is that you the detour signs don't just go up the roads close and then the detours come up.

The detour signs are up there how much how how previous to the road closure are the detour signs up.

The detour signs uh go up the day that we're actively closing the road but there were can we let me finish now let me finish I know you're trying to jump to the end here.

Just understand we had variable message signs for weeks prior to the detour telling everybody that the bridge is going to be closed down.

There's going to be detours.

I'm sure what kind of message these are the big digital variable message signs that are still up you can change the messaging on them.

I think you you've been in a neighborhood because I I heard you you've been there did you not see the signs there I see them now but the complete the neighborhood's destroyed right now right it's all under construction.

It's a mess.

But they were there before it is not about this neighborhood specifically it's in the future what could we do to avoid upset in the neighborhood?

And so I was asking if we could post signs or something of that nature to give the neighborhood and the passerbys everybody who lives there who utilize these roads on a regular basis some sort of heads up that this was coming.

I'm not asking this to be confrontational I'm asking this as a suggestion of something maybe we could do as a city proactively to avoid the upset that has happened in this instance.

Let me just say this I've been in the city for 20 years.

This is the first time we've had this much discussion over a detour.

We follow the same process we've been for the last 20 years we work intimately with the police department our traffic engineer evaluates the detours we work with every possible extent that we can to notify folks we work with the Board of Education.

We work with the bus company.

So you've taken an interest in this project I understand that that's that's that's good.

But just understand that we follow the same process and procedures that we've done throughout the 20 years I've been here and probably previous to May.

We do a lot of outreach unfortunately this bridge project doesn't have a lot of alternatives for uh detours but that's what we're dealing with.

So no I understand that I was just asking what not even what happened in this instance Mr.

Adarilla I'm asking is there more we could do that's it.

Is there more we could do so you do what else would you suggest we do?

This is your job.

I don't know it well.

But you're criticizing what I did so what else would you suggest we do I'm I'm he makes more than you I could take his job.

No comment again this is the first time I've ever had uh you got folks on the council here as long as I've been here we've never had this much discussion over a detour in the 20 years I've been here and we've had some significant road closures.

So I I appreciate your concerns and if you have any suggestions please I'll give you my cell phone number call me.

Thank you.

Thank you Mr.

Councilman Giordano I'm sorry did you have it on the I'd just like to make one uh quick it's hard to do that.

I'd like to make one quick comment about this um uh the information about the specific detour was posted on the city's website and it had uh um uh it had a lot of detail and it also had to be coordinated with a simultaneous project uh by Eversource which was happening nearby and the combination of those two projects um really uh just uh removed um a lot of the options and the um uh the the only thing left was uh really uh top field and um uh and you know it's unfortunate because uh uh top field really is not typically a through road or a conduit road from uh um downtown to uh the suburbs there and uh so um you know really uh the um a lot of the uh a lot of the confusion was um the increase in traffic on a uh uh residential road um one that it was not used as a through road now uh that being said um uh it's it it was it was just not possible to uh to um to do uh this detour on wet on Westville um

And so really a lot of the uh a lot of the confusion was the increase in traffic on a uh residential road.

Um one that it was not used as a through road.

Now uh that being said, um uh it's it it was it was just not possible to uh to uh um to do uh this detour on wet on Westville.

Um but uh again the information about this was uh up there months before the construction started.

So um uh you you you can't make people read the website.

It you all you can do is put the information out there and uh um and I think it was done uh very effectively.

Thank you, Chief and uh Antonio.

Thank you, Councilman.

Councilman Coello.

Yeah, thank you, Your Honor.

Uh question for Antonio, please.

If you could just give us an update on uh status of obviously the utility companies work more specifically to the bridge on track for schedule, project the completion days, et cetera.

That would help probably alleviate, I think sharing that information helps alleviate some of the pain for the owners when they can see the end in sight for all the people that are taking the detour, me included, because I get a number of phone calls because I have parents and friends that live up there.

So if you could share that with us, I'd appreciate it.

Sure.

Um so the uh bridge project is about two weeks ahead of schedule.

We had several unforeseen conditions that we were able to work through.

We caught up the schedule.

The box culverts have been installed.

All of the foundation work for the box culverts is now in.

Uh we're gonna be pouring uh the wing walls on the downstream side this coming week.

So um the to the best of my guess, we're about two weeks ahead of schedule.

Our goal is to open up the road at least to one-way traffic, probably in early August and quickly finish up before the end of the construction season.

Um we are also um, as um uh councilman Jordano mentioned, we are working day in and day out uh with the Eversource Project on uh Westville Avenue.

Uh this is a very complicated project that is approved by uh the public utility regulatory commission.

Um I can push them as much as I can, but in the end, if they come down and really kind of tell me that I'm hindering that project that could potentially be uh brought up in front of uh um a committee uh to determine why we're uh impacting that project.

So that's a very important project for them to be uh uh get into the ground.

Um we're hoping to get them off of Westville Avenue by the 19th.

Kids are out of school.

My understanding is somewhere between the 22nd and 23rd.

Um so with them being off of Westville, we hope that the volume will reduce, things will improve a little bit on um Topstone as we continue to push the bridge project.

Uh we've had uh the contractor working Saturdays, uh so we're pushing it as much as we can.

Um weather is an as um an unfortunate um impact.

If we do get some heavy rains, it does set us back.

Uh but we've we've worked through some of those challenges already.

Um with any bridge project, as you come out of the ground, the project starts going much quicker.

So I think we've probably dealt with the worst of uh the project and the unforeseen conditions.

So I'm hoping that we can start to accelerate uh that schedule that we had, which is the end of August.

Okay.

If I may just ask one follow-up question.

So with regard to the one-way traffic, is that going to be uh with traffic control or it's gonna be east-west, like what's what what do you see that visioning, say before school opens?

Is it going to be buses running one way or both ways or so my goal would be when we get close to that to meet with the chief, sit down, go through the logistics.

Uh we have our traffic engineer would review what's the best alternative option.

The approach coming in from um I don't know which way is east or west.

I think it's the north side is a terrible approach because it's a blind spot.

Um so we even thought of having we have alternating uh traffic lights, but it didn't provide enough stopping site distance.

It would actually created uh a pretty significant uh public hazard if we did that.

So we're gonna be working through those challenges with the police department and look at each option.

Um and and that's what we're trying to do to at least accommodate some of the folks that uh are slightly impacted or have been impacted uh more than others.

Um I do want to commend all of the residents on Westville.

I've had contractors working now Saturdays and Sundays.

The folks on Westville have been incredibly uh uh tolerant.

Uh they've also understand that uh this upgrade for electrical transmission lines is something that was uh really supposed to happen about five years ago, and the project is finally moving forward.

I also want to let you know that you're only seeing a small tip of that project.

This is a major, major undertaking that's gonna impact our downtown area and the outskirts of our city.

So it's it's a huge project that uh, you know, at some point maybe I give you guys a little information on it.

But it's significant.

It's a huge project, about five miles of very complex uh excavating and dealing with utilities.

Thanks for the update.

Appreciate it.

I I do want to mention and take this uh opportunity publicly let everybody know.

Kennedy Avenue Bridge is in construction.

We'd um we did a bunch of reach out.

There will be multiple closures there.

We're gonna actually relocate the bus stop, so I don't want anybody to be surprised by these activities.

All right, thank you.

Has that been positive?

Thank you, Antonio.

Council, uh Councilman McAllister, I apologize.

Specifically for Chief Riddenauer and uh Chief Sturtevin as well.

I just want to uh compliment you uh on a positive side here, Chief uh and your uh your management staff and certainly the uh the members who are out there on the street every day.

Looking at your uniform crime reports here are absolutely positive.

Uh you have reduced crime in some of these major categories by 50 percent.

That is an astounding number.

Um I just want you to uh bring back to your department uh the compliments.

I think not only myself but my colleagues here have for the incredible reduction in crime that you've been able to implement in this city.

Um as you know, my family has been very active in public safety for years, and uh I know it's not an easy job.

This is a difficult thing to do, and you've been uh very successful at it.

Keep up the good work.

Thank you.

I appreciate the comments and and certainly uh all the work that our officers do to keep this community safe.

But uh I have to say it's a partnership.

It's a partnership with this council, it's a partnership with the mayor's office and partnership with our community.

So building those relationships within our community allows them to feel comfortable talking to us so that we can uh solve crime and uh work together to make this the great community that it is.

All right.

Thank you, Chief.

Chief Riedenhauer.

One more thing.

Yes, sir.

Okay.

Uh Fire Chief.

Um in conjunction with what I just said to Chief Riddenauer and uh uh Chief Sturter and his staff.

I'd also like to say something similar to uh Chief Loungebury here.

Um a lot of people don't realize it, but um that the City of Danbury not only provides excellent service to his residents, but we rely on the City of Danbury Public Safety Division to also provide a lot of support for the region.

And one in particular that I'd like to say was this terrible accident in Brewster, um, you know, less than 24 hours ago when it came down to brass tax that they called the City of Danbury for help.

And um for those of you who did see it, I certainly uh was on the fringe of it.

Um the ability of the City of Danbury to provide um expert services for uh you know a severe entrapment um traffic situation that uh always when we have these bad accidents impacts the region for hours, if not days.

And the fact that we were able to go representing the city of Danbury to go over there and have a very, very positive impact on the outcome of that terrible accident.

Um take care of the people who are injured, get them to the proper facilities, provide that support, not only yesterday, but on a regular basis is outstanding.

And uh also what that does is uh we get the traffic flowing again, and that has a tremendous economic impact on the region.

So please bring that back to your staff.

Um I was impressed by the resources you were able to muster and get over there quickly yesterday.

Thank you.

Thank you, Councilman.

Uh we regularly help the uh surrounding communities.

Uh just last month we were in Richfield helping them with our ladder truck.

Uh as you know, we're we're in Bethel, Brookfield.

We we cover the whole area.

Um so it's uh it's a pleasure to be able to work with our surrounding communities.

We also rely on them.

You know, we've called, you have you well known firsthand, we call the surrounding communities for help as well when we need uh need assistance backfilling for larger fires in Danbury.

So it's it's a really uh large community network effort that expands beyond the boundaries of Thambare.

I also think the fire department deserves some applause as well.

Thank you.

Sorry.

Yes, thank you.

Thank you.

Um through the chair, I had a question for Chief Rittenhour, a follow-up.

Thank you.

So I'm good.

Uh I'll just echo what uh Councilman McAllister said.

Appreciate everything you guys do with your leadership and the men and women uh in the blue.

Uh just a follow-up question to uh uh I think something I brought up might have been last month and a follow-up to Councilman Perkin with regard to question uh cameras that went that I had asked about.

I know there were I remember you making a comment there were a certain number of say certain companies that you didn't want to work with for whatever reason.

Now the qu here's my question, it's not political.

Obviously, you and your you know you're great people uh on your force rely on those cameras to get assistance to help side crime help solve crimes, put the bad people away.

So if in fact these cameras were turned off because of perhaps maybe a company or an issue that maybe shared that information with federal agents that we don't want it to have, not about to get into that political dispute.

The question is have we replaced uh companies that just share the information with the Danbury Blue that so they get the information so we can you guys can help solve future crimes going forward?

Well, I'll just say that we we didn't turn anything off.

It was um a trial that we just never uh implemented.

So it's not like we had with uh that particular company, it's not like we had something going and then we turned it off.

We never executed the relationship with them.

But we do have other uh tech technology that we're still using that is helping uh save uh keep this community safe.

Okay.

So did if if we didn't execute that contract or that agreement, are there other companies that we're currently working with to get the information you guys need to help these crimes?

Yes, there's other companies that we're working with, and there's other um you know access that we have through private partners as well as other law enforcement agencies.

Thank you.

Council, there any other remarks or questions, any other remarks or questions, any other remarks or questions?

Seeing none, I will try your minds.

All those in favor of accepting departmental reports as presented, signify by saying aye.

Any opposed?

The ayes have it.

The vote is so ordered.

I hereby extend all committees and will entertain a motion to adjourn.

Is there a second?

Seconded by Councilman Salvatore.

Any remarks, any remarks, remarks?

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Ayes have it by acclamation.