Public Hearing on FY2027 Property Tax Levy - March 26, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Public Hearing on FY2027 Property Tax Levy Rate and Amounts - March 26, 2026
The Davenport City Council held a special meeting on March 26, 2026, to open a public hearing on the proposed FY2027 property tax levy rate and amounts, affecting all wards. Two residents spoke during the hearing, raising concerns about allocation priorities, transparency, and the accuracy of the city's tax projections.
Public Comments & Testimony
- John D. Blackman (1334 East Ninth Street) expressed support for a more even distribution of any tax increase to schools rather than to cities and the county.
- Emmerich Shoymus (Ward 6) criticized the proposed increase, citing Davenport's reputation for poor roads and fiscal irresponsibility. He questioned whether council members had reviewed the full 473-page budget and challenged the math on the proposal, alleging a discrepancy between stated property value increases (10%) and the displayed tax rate decrease. He called for improved transparency and accountability in city spending.
Key Outcomes
- The public hearing was opened and closed with no vote taken on the levy. The meeting adjourned, with the council scheduled to reconvene at 5:30 p.m. for its regular meeting.
Meeting Transcript
Brian, would you please call the world? Follow the way, present lean in. President Rick, here. Newton. Blum, here. T Dunn. Here. Joke? Here. And Burkeholder. Here. All right. We just have one agenda item this evening, and it's to open a public hearing on the FY2027 proposed proposed property tax levy rate. And amounts. It affects all wards. So I will open that at this time and ask if there's any public comment. Yep, come on up. Just state your name and ward or address. My name is John D. Blackman. I live at 1334 East Ninth Street. And I appreciate receiving this. If the proposed tax increase goes into effect, I would like to see allocations more evenly distributed to the schools rather than the cities and the county. That's just one citizen. Just my opinion. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Blackman. Is there anyone else from the public on this public hearing? Thank you for having the meeting. My name is Emmerich Shoymus. I'm in Ward 6. Um initially I was responding just to this letter on the property tax. And I noticed a couple things that troubled me. So I started doing some digging. There's a clause here. Okay, so that's the reason for the meeting. That completely disagrees with the real estate professionals who say in 2016 up till date, you're showing between a one point, 1.8 and 1.9% property tax increase. So I started to look a little deeper. Umderman Jobgen knows me for several years, knows that I'm not afraid of uh voicing a complaint. Davenport has a unique reputation in the state of Iowa as having the worst roads in the state, and as being fiscally not the most responsible. Case in point. Remember about three years ago we got the stop sign? If you go anywhere else in Davenport, if you have an illuminated stop sign because of children, it's lit with LEDs all the way around. We have a low wattage, single bulb on top. The most of the times you can't even see. So I'm sensitive to how the money is being spent. When I went into the budget or your budget proposal, I was flabbergasted, and I'd like to ask every one of you an honest question. Have you looked through all 473 pages? We're just listening now.
openpublica.com