Davenport City Council and Humane Society Discuss Contract Transition – March 27, 2026
Joint Meeting: Davenport City Council and Humane Society of Scott County – March 27, 2026
This joint meeting was called to clarify the contractual relationship for animal control and shelter services. The Humane Society stated there is zero chance of continuing the long-term contract, shifting the focus to a responsible transition plan. Council members expressed frustration over financial transparency and timeline, while both sides agreed on a short-term extension to allow the city to prepare its own services.
Discussion Items
- Contract History and Financials: The three-year contract signed in 2023 for $391,000 was canceled early by the Humane Society, leading to negotiations. Costs increased from $800,000 to a current asking price of $1.23 million per year. The Humane Society provided financial breakdowns based on animal intake percentages and call volumes, but council members (notably Alderman Grip) found the documentation insufficient and the math inconsistent. The Humane Society argued that actual service costs have exceeded $1.2 million since 2023 and that they have subsidized losses, while the city has only offered up to $840,000 plus $40,000 increments.
- Communication Breakdown: Multiple council members stated they were surprised by the Humane Society’s February 4, 2026 letter, which they interpreted as a notice to end services. The Humane Society clarified they were responding to city staff’s direction that transition was required. Councilwoman Newton noted that the city’s October 22, 2025 letter mentioned ending the contract only if no agreement could be reached, not as a unilateral city decision.
- Transition Planning: The Humane Society confirmed they will no longer seek a long-term contract. Council members requested a timeline and costs for an extension to allow the city to set up its own animal control and shelter operations. The Humane Society offered a six-month extension (July–December 2026) for $650,000 (the amount in their February 4 letter). Councilman Dunn proposed continuing on a month-to-month basis at $100,000 per month thereafter, with a 60-day cancellation notice. The Humane Society board must approve this.
- City’s Next Steps: Council acknowledged they need to decide whether to operate only animal control or also build a shelter. City Administrator Tim Gleason will develop options and bring proposals to council.
Key Outcomes
- The Humane Society’s board of directors will meet by April 10, 2026 to discuss the proposed transition terms, and will provide a final response by April 17, 2026.
- The city council agreed to a one-week turnaround for their response (by April 17) after receiving the Humane Society’s formal proposal.
- Both parties expressed intent to ensure uninterrupted animal welfare services during the transition.
Meeting Transcript
Well we could go ahead and get started. Um I think at least for my benefit, maybe a couple of other folks. Same for you. I think maybe some introductions would be good. Um so I'll start. Maybe we'll go this way. So I'll have Jason Gordon, I'm mayor. Ben Joven, six Ward Alderman. Uh Erica Gunn, the executive director of the Humane Society. I'm Kelly Eccles from the board of the Humane Society. And Tyson Danner from the board. Julie Gillespie from the board. Kyle Grip, Alderman at large. Tim Faney, we're on the board. Jasmine Newton, Alder Woman at large. Matt Lenin and Eighth Ward Alderman. Mark Holloway, seven to autumn. Tim Dunn, second. Well about third board alderman. Jade Bertholder, fourth board elder woman. All right. So I think I don't necessarily know how to proceed at this point. So it doesn't have a set agenda, but I think you know, broadly speaking, we're coming up. Um we're you know, trying to get our heads and arms around some of this these issues related to our contractual relationship. So I I'll let you maybe say a few words if you'd like to get us started. Yeah, I mean, I think it would be helpful for us kind of what questions to council have for us to help us know kind of where to go with the conversation because we've had a lot of conversation with staff, so just kind of wondering what questions are the same or different, and what can we answer for you guys about that, and then kind of what our path forward would be. Sure. I'm Randy Rockwell. I'm on the uh board with the inmates today. Thank you. So yeah, um I'll what's the current proposal? Yeah, we sent um the offer for what we would provide past June 30th. Um staff asked us to provide that because there was the talk of them transitioning those services within the into Davenport so that they are providing shelter and animal control services. So we provided what that would be of what we could do. That would be an additional six months past the current June 30th contract, and then um Mr. Gleason sent another proposal back on March 20th. So that was just Friday afternoon, so we don't have a response for that yet because it's only been about four business days, so we haven't gotten to review all of that together as a group. So was that a was that his counter um sort of beliefs on March 20th? Tim, was that what that was? It was and actually uh Mayor uh that that came um somewhat unexpectedly. Uh I had requested a meeting, just to introduce myself. Since I was now the permanent city administrator, I wanted to meet uh Erica, you know, regardless of uh you know where uh this relationship was gonna go. Uh we're gonna be working together, you know, whether it's in the short term or or longer term. And I think the uh vice chair of the board, uh Kelly, and I apologize for not knowing her last name or having a pulled up uh in that conversation uh probably two, three weeks ago, it came up uh that uh Humane Society was in fact expecting uh a possibility of uh a counter proposal of the letter that we received, I believe on February 4th, uh we definitely did not take it that way. And I said something in that meeting about it, and uh thought uh you know it would be prudent for us to actually put pen to paper and submit a proposal, a counter in this case, uh, and see if we can't find something that uh helps both of us uh given the uh very important mission uh that uh that we're trying to provide the community. So do you view that counter as a like a counter to remain in a contractual relationship for an extended period of time, or do you view that more as a we'll we'll buy some time as you guys separate and do your own thing. How are you viewing that counter maybe? Yeah, I mean I think after our discussion with Tim, which was great. Tim, thank you for reaching out and doing that. That was very nice.
openpublica.com